The Sino-Indian War: Why India Turned On China In The 1960s | Mao's Cold War | Timeline

[@sdve4512]

So long story short China outplayed India in the game of war

[@coolbreeze2.0-mortemadfasc13]

Chinese guy appears to be saying, "Yes, yes, you just stay over there. This side is for us, that side is for you."

[@harrymckenzie3725]

Churchill's definition of human history: 'One damn thing after another'

[@deneshbhaskar3944]

Churchill was a racist and guy that was the last the realize the British Empire was over lol. It was funny to see the British think they deserve a veto at the UN . They don't

[@andrei19238]

@@deneshbhaskar3944 uk has a bigger gdp than india ..

[@deneshbhaskar3944]

@@andrei19238 India has passed uk u idiot lol.

[@BlutoandCo]

@@deneshbhaskar3944 No he wasnt.

[@BlutoandCo]

@@deneshbhaskar3944 No it hasnt. A country that has a space program, but still dosnt have indoor toilets and throws dead people in rivers.

[@rohansahni9701]

my granddads served in this war for the Indian Armed Forces.

[@zackabee5498]

Oh ok

[@commie5211]

captured?

[@benjiang9789]

India claimed Tibet. But its power never has matched its ambition.

[@anfrankogezamartincic1161]

Timeline rules. This is my 3rd doc in a row. Sweet binge

[@dobishs]

Perfect timing!

[@Rocky-qw4kb]

The Chinese living in India at the time suffered as a result. Many of them were put in concentration camps in Deoli, Rajasthan.

[@alxvideos6634]

The trigger of the Sino-Indian war was that the border line drawn by the British (I suspect the Anglo-Saxons deliberately drew it wrong) moved part of the Chinese territory to the Indian side. Of course the Indians accept this good thing, but can the Chinese accept it? ? Why should a British person decide the border between China and India? The war happened and the British got their wish

[@richardcheese9429]

Classic. Blame the white man. Never anyone else’s fault.

[@NahidKénitra]

​@@richardcheese9429Because its almost always his fault...

[@guyseydel1080]

Britain and France, The two main coloninizers in the world have left many a broken country in its wake.

[@JATP-wp6eh]

Lmfaooo. You don’t think the Chinese just want to take your land. They don’t care about England and lines. Similar to the Japanese. They would have taken over India.

[@zhonghuang7987]

The pictures are mostly irrelevant with the contents. Many of the pictures are on Korean War, not about Sino-India border conflict.

[@Peter-uo8zr]

clips from korea war; ignorant fake researcher boldly judge Mao. --- laughable!

[@markmy_words9767]

Yeah but they had no choice. Surprisingly, there aren’t that many videos on the 1962 war. Some of these videos are even on the Indo Pakistani wars.

[@RKarmaKill]

It really was a cold war at the heights of those mountains

[@chucklynch6523]

China is a CONTRIVED world power, but I will tell you HOW that was all initiated. As it turned out, in the late 1940’s when future Secretary of State, General George Marshall, acting upon the direction of the corporate globalist Deep State completely disarmed nationalist leader Chiang Kai Chek and his forces, knowing full well that Joseph Stalin, using all the military hardware and logistics support given to him by the U.S. during WWII, that he no longer needed, would ship all that war material/support on over to Mao in Northern China, where Mao quickly overran the forces of Chiang Kai Chek, establishing a Communist dictatorship in China. Approximately 24 years later President Nixon opened the door to China in 1972, setting the stage for the next corporate globalist/Deep State move when just a few years later George H.W. Bush was appointed ambassador the China and spent much of his time as such establishing a set of arrangements/agreements with Chinese leadership whereby Western private central banking and multinationals corporate interests would then begin the process of transferring investment capital from the U.S. and countries of Western Europe to China to avail themselves of the cheap Chinese labor market. Furthermore, in some cases the Chinese have actually been allowed to steal Western technology, or were flat-out given it by the Clintons. The corporate globalist and Deep State would not only make enormous returns on investment, but would turn China from a backward agrarian nation to an industrial powerhouse in the matter of just a few decades, while hurdling it toward becoming the dominant military-industrial force on the planet for the 21st century, as the U.S. and Western Europe were both slated to transition into being post-industrial 3rd world cesspools, where only the elites could afford relative affluence and comfy lifestyles, at which point those Western nations would then be funneled into a new corporate globalist world order, led by an authoritarian China where world governance would then be facilitated by means of elitist bureaucrats appointed by the private central banks and mega corporations that headquartered their world power within the territories of China, whose mandate would include the use of its resources to carry out the dictates of world governance. P.S. Oh yeah, communism is great...just look at how the people of Hong Kong can't wait to adhere themselves to the CCP, ha!!

[@WorkerBeesUnite]

Cold for the soldiers, perhaps; not for the people in power

[@suhongpan5459]

@@chucklynch6523 Go learn some history, Chines people choice Mao side, Chiang only take care rich people and west power.

[@jesusislordsavior6343]

R K Right. And I thought that the Italo-Austrian conflict in the Alps during ww1 was a bad idea. ' "Vanity of vanities." says the Preacher, "Vanity of vanities; all is vanity." ' (Ecclesiastes 1:2)

[@rosasmoreira8229]

@@WorkerBeesUnitedrinks e muito folgado de mais ri tanto que tô 987a a 3graça e 36de a

[@andro7862]

India and the USSR vs Pakistan and China is one of the most underrated parts of the cold war.

[@shermanpeabody6102]

U.S. sided with Pakistan

[@itr8247]

It was India and USSR vs Pakistan, China, UK and USA.

[@Robespierre-lI]

@@itr8247 No. This is just not true. China's role in the Cold War is best understood if you see them as a third geopolitical pole. At times, they aligned more with the USSR. At times, they aligned more with the USA. But at no time were they true allies of either. The US-Pakistan alliance is also not what it appears at first. It was an alliance of convenience because the US needed some kind of position in South Asia to cc counterbalance Soviet interests in pushing south (which they ultimately did in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan). India would have been a more natural ally but opted for official nonalignment in the Cold War. China did, however, side with Pakistan because of their mutual problems with India. The Soviets, meanwhile, quietly and indirectly supported India, even though India claimed to be nonaligned.

[@王班超]

我们中国人只是觉得这是一场边境冲突而已，因为没打几天，对方就散架了。

[@willengel2458]

Indians and Pakistanis are of the same people, separated by religions. now tell me about tolerance and peace.

[@zeaven1094]

mao: I thought about it for ten days and nights, but I didn’t understand why India was fighting this battle.

[@8cyl6speed]

Story of ccp history

[@bassdeere]

I don't think the Indians liked what they did to the tibetans.

[@privacyadvocate6697]

@@bassdeere really?

[@bhanukiran5630]

Humanitarian Organizations in India didn't like what China was doing in Tibet. But India did not start fighting until China entered the Indian LOC. I don't know what happened behind the curtains of China to withdraw their forces all of the sudden, but I respect that decision.

[@carlabroderick5508]

Policy of strategic depth. Tibet is a buffer between India and China until China conquers Tibet.

[@WolfgangVonKempelen838]

Sun Tsu: The art of war. Things never change, we never learn and we love a good fight until the consequences are felt. We take a pause to lick the wounds and happily start all over again. Nice.

[@XL_Bull]

Wow nice words 👌😍

[@WolfgangVonKempelen838]

@@XL_Bull Thanks

[@markarca6360]

They NEVER learned their lessons from the SARS epidemic in 2003. Instead, they continued hiding the facts and the origins of the COVID-19 epidemic.

[@davidbrewster1994]

Geez... I'm an ole Vietnam veteran I wouldn't mind a limited incursion somewhere as long as the other guys are Sixty five years old plus and don't have real guns!!

[@WolfgangVonKempelen838]

@Xen Let us hope that these nice words & predictions materialize for the sake of all living things (plants & beasts) on this planet.

[@killerakame6342]

I love watching history documentary I swear if they did this in history class I would’ve listened 😂😂

[@privacyadvocate6697]

you can't read about it yourself you have to watch it?

[@kefkahkefkah]

​@@privacyadvocate6697and a expert after the first viewing

[@frost365]

@@privacyadvocate6697 just me but i like both watch and read at the same time both is good

[@franciscojuarez8542]

I think we would have our military a lot larger too.

[@S1lverspike]

@@privacyadvocate6697 people learn in different ways.

[@catsnads01]

Good doc, thanks. It would have been amazing to hear the Indian soldiers´ perspective. Is there a sequel about the China - USSR clashes?

[@ezzo8803]

Yep. Grate documentary, but would be more balanced if we had from Indian veterans.

[@mrnarason]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZqvJmpirjamio6c

[@othmansiru6513]

US and Russia looking for opportunities of selling arms to both sides, testing latest weapons, US will never fight Indian's war.

[@joshuamangham9588]

@@mickkrever4084China is only communist in name???that's like saying china.is only.chinese in name...ur an idiot...chima is a communist country...not as.bad as most but still is a communist country...go back to history class ok

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

how long until China's troops occupy Washington D.C. ?

[@anfrankogezamartincic1161]

Imagine the horrors these soldiers experienced

[@thebestevertherewas]

This video is very biased. So much so that the Publisher knows it and have made it unavailable in India. So that you can't hear the story of the Indian POV.

[@stayhungry1503]

yes but very beautiful nature area in the mountains where they fought

[@altaccaltacc7652]

@@thebestevertherewas i kinda feel the same about you but this video series were mostly are from the chinese or mao's perspective the title itself explain about it

[@ArnoldTeras]

@@thebestevertherewas In truth, Nehru should have exchanged Aksai Chin for Pradesh, that was the BEST scenario. China might have supported India on Kashmir, might have taken its side on the 1971 war, might have even been friends with India today. But that dream is long since shattered.

[@alekmartin9999]

Foolish comment expecting quid pro from china...look what Tibetan people must feel

[@TT-Trillion]

Great documentary. Within a decade of establishment of China, it defeated the U.S. twice, one in Korean war and one in Vietnam war. Sino-Indian war confuses me very much. Why China unilaterally declare end of war with Chinese troops just 300km away from New Delhi? And why Indian troops withdraw so fast and with smile on their soldiers' faces?

[@雪风会保护好大家的]

后勤补给跟不上了

[@inesruirui5247]

三儿家军队一线士兵大部分都是低种姓的，去前线也是送死的，何况它们的执行力，作战能力那么拉胯，能撤退不用送死还不高兴吗？

[@svenkrules9855]

Me: **sees the title of the video** Also me: "Ah. So basically modern day India and China."

[@ScottNguyenRCAC]

60s -US has entered the chat -China has left the chat 2020 -US has entered the chat -China: interesting!

[@rickbarrington]

Not really

[@specialsandwitz3634]

-ASEAN entered the chat

[@kenllacer]

Great documentary but I wish to hear the voices on the Indian side as well. On another video about the Sino-Soviet split, I was hoping to see some Russian perspectives as well.

[@CTOInformation]

tell it to BBC.

[@CrasusC]

I think it's because there were so few Indian troops actually fought in this war, I think the Chinese troops out-numbered the Indians by 4:1. Of those who fought, most of them became POWs and they would rather not talk about it, so it was very difficult to find Indian veterans to do the interviews. They did interview Indian foreign policy analysts, e.g. @40:43, so it was not a completely one-sided story.

[@ooxx201]

There is a book

[@vazirncars786]

True, a lot of the Indian side debates have been totally ignored while the Zhou EnLai - Mao internal party debates were commented on. General Thorat's warnings about the Chinese build up and how they could be countered, the ignoring of these warnings by Krishna Menon who liked to lecture western leaders but failed to heed the signs, why the then more powerful Indian Air Force was not even used when they could've devastated the PLA troops. None of this has been discussed or shown.

[@zhangruyi3153]

I think Mao was a warmonger and since his passing, China has not gone to war with other countries and for over 40 years China has lived peacefully with its neighbours. I am glad China and Russia are good friends now and I hope one day India and China too can become good friends.

[@SK-lt1so]

"An Area of Darkness" V. S. Naipaul in 1964 gives a good account of India during the conflict.

[@mehebubulhusain]

Heard this story several times from my dad. Good docu.

[@gondaljarrat8864]

u always defeated even in history and how can change this losers

[@cosmoray9750]

Provocations Over Taiwan kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH20hpeAe9aeias

[@foxtrotwhiskey874]

@@gondaljarrat8864 lol you indians are hilarious, you are yet to take kashmir from Pakistan bsky. 😂😂

[@superpooper_2030]

The Chinese so brave no excuses all real talk

[@ppshetty1895]

Not in Afghanistan

[@BaajiThe3rd2.40s]

Japanese army were much brave during ww2

[@OntopoftheRN]

@@BaajiThe3rd2.40sYou don’t call inhumane brave. Even Naziss called the Japanese evil.

[@yanakal652]

​@Anikarjan11 and where are they now bunch of american lap dogs😂

[@bluetigers1364]

just like they lost in 1967 war against india

[@Ironpancakemoose]

Whats the background music that plays in 36:00?

[@drewwagner4802]

Wow, to achieve victory and return disputed lands back to an enemy, amazing.

[@bhanukiran5630]

It is in a way, I respect that. But I would appreciate if China doesn't cross Indian LOC again. Why does China care, if Indian people are angry about what happened in Tibet. India didn't strike until China crossed Indian LOC.

[@timetraveller2300]

@@bhanukiran5630 BS India followed the forward policy believing you could just keep building posts behind China's LOC and we would retreat. Hilarious.

[@willengel2458]

it's quite simple really, back then China didn't have good road access to the disputed area so it's difficult to resupply the soldiers therefore it's indefensible. Tibetans are markedly different than Indians that's not in dispute.

[@nancysmith9189]

China could not afford a sustained war with India. It was a poor country as well. This war was really a tragedy that could have been avoided.

[@dotdash8327]

The war did cause sino-Russian split that persists to this day and has caused current day India to join the US, Japan, Australia alliance that is a major headache to Xi Jinping. All in all I think the fall out from this war wasn't good for either countries!

[@isaura4720]

Thanks 👋🏽 great history recap !

[@B007-g4e]

Didn't know about the war between India and China. Great documentary... Now, I know about the current relationship between India, China and Russia.

[@willengel2458]

the losing side always holds a grudge. gracious loser is a myth. 😁😁

[@cosmoray9750]

Govt Sells Oil to China & India while ... kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2fWlKOZqJqZeJo

[@山村小牛犊]

@@willengel2458 maybe not right, see what Japan to USA

[@NeostormXLMAX]

@@山村小牛犊 japan is a colony right now, japan had UNCONDITIONALLY surrendered, and has its entire political system dismantled, china did not dismantle and completely destroy india, it was a small borderclash in comparison and china did not march to new delhi despite having the ability to.

[@almighty3372]

Did you see what the British Imperial Soldier did to the Tibetan at 3:00 of the video??? He just knocked the poor guy aside!!!!!!

[@thearbyter7953]

That was a Chinese soldier.

[@almighty3372]

@@thearbyter7953 Chinese soldier with a typical British helmet on his head?....are you serious?

[@sidharthasidhartha5184]

Judging from the way they marched, their hats, their mannerisms, their uniforms. I am convinced that they are British.

[@amossutandi]

@@sidharthasidhartha5184 but that is not in line with western narrative, so that soldier must be chinese.

[@lvjinbin28]

@@thearbyter7953 british india invaded tibet, get educated before comment.

[@bryandeng570]

China had the 1st highway in 1990's . How did China build a highway on the border with India in 1950's ? It should be a road .

[@qfs5900]

向我们的老兵致敬，没有你们就没有改革开放的和平发展时期。看看我们的老兵爷爷们，眼神充满着光芒，神采奕奕。

[@ziqianye7120]

真的是要感谢他们，他们都是共和国的英雄，功臣。

[@freedombro]

@@ziqianye7120 china isn't a republic Its a dictatorship

[@weitbdk1665]

@@freedombro As long as we Chinese have a good life, even the emperor system doesn’t matter

[@xila-man8249]

@@weitbdk1665 That's what I'm sayin... I Iive in a Democratic country where almost nothing gets done (development is so slow), then people criticize me for being a Chinese fan (because of its fast development and very effective policies)... I mean what's the use of being so called "free" while being poor...

[@fofoqueiro5524]

@@freedombro probably you can start with UK and Japan to make them republic countries first

[@flyjim4558]

Peace and cooperation are the best way for India and China !

[@sharedfuture5669]

I odnt think India can learn a lesson from this, when deomestic eveironment gets serious, India will again raise a conflict in the border and distract the attention of Indian ppl, and beaten again, then rest for another decades before another beaten.

[@sharedfuture5669]

Light come after deep dark, peace come after fierce battle

[@Jenvlogs404]

They’re both iconic and big, if only China removed communism.

[@demorvie]

@@sharedfuture5669 Lol, great poetry right there.

[@Shrey_Shrek]

@@sharedfuture5669 no way bro described china

[@david-lonewolf8924]

A big part of history was missing here--Tibet officially became a part of China during 18th Century when Manchu (Qing Dynasty 1644-1911) rulers finally secured their solid control over the land, the relationship lasted till late 19th Century and early 20th Century when the British sought to expand its power from India to Tibet, they sent out several military expedition into Tibet which in the end forced Tibet to sever its tie with the Qing Dynasty government. Since then till 1949, for almost 40 years, as China slipped deeper into civil war and then suffered from Japanese invasion which lasted 8 years and then followed with another three years of civil war... no government was able to reach Tibet until 1949.

[@wshawn6817]

不知道你从哪里学来的历史，晚清和中华民国都对西藏有行政管辖权，都有派驻官员在拉萨，但是不管理西藏具体事务，西藏奴隶制度一直保留到1950年代，直到共产党带来全面改革。英国对西藏的控制只是局部的，英军与藏军进行了几次战斗后，英国势力进入西藏，并产生了一定影响而已

[@OntopoftheRN]

The British messed up the whole world! 😂

[@风筝-k7b]

Tibetans are originally a branch of the Han people. Tibetans and Han people have the same relationship as Ukrainians and Russians. Tibetans and Chinese both belong to the Sino-Tibetan language family. We separated five thousand years ago. Tibet was officially merged into China in the 12th Century, it has been a part of China for 800 years. Taking a step back, which one of the Tibetans looks like an Indian and which one looks like an Englishman? How can Tibet become a part of India? Are you not blushing because of the Sino-Indian war?

[@david-lonewolf8924]

@@wshawn6817 我所描述和你所讲完全一致，你可能没有认真读完我所写的内容。英国在清末数次染指西藏，最终迫使西藏与满清朝廷做出切割，民国建立后重新建立对西藏的控制，但因内外交困，始终无法做到彻底的有效控制，直至1959年新中国平定叛乱之后。

[@david-lonewolf8924]

@@风筝-k7b 800年也好，8000年也罢，“自古以来”永远只能是外交辞令，吾人若无开疆之心便无守土之勇。吐蕃还好有后来有中央王朝一系列正确的政治决策和及时有效的军事行动才避免吐蕃（西藏）重蹈交趾（越南）覆辙。新疆也是如此，差一点就成了沙俄的囊中物。台湾也是我同胞，汉家血脉，但现在也是闹分裂最严重的，再有多少血缘关系也没有用，更不用说5000年前一家人这种情况了，要按这种说法，人类都从非洲走出，难不成我们都是非洲黑蜀黍的后代，非洲某国也该向中国宣誓主权？说到底就是国家实力，国家实力的至要便是民众的尚武，决策层的勇气和决心，和全国上下开疆拓土的魄力以及对自身文化的绝对自信，在这方面汉唐便是榜样。少说话多做事，说话千遍万遍，不如说半句干他丫的，人类永远都崇拜强权，“自古以来”只是把别人彻底打趴后，嗨完了后对对手讲的安慰话。没有实力的支撑，没有坚定的意志力做后盾和果决的行动做前提，“自古以来”就连一坨屎的价值都不如。

[@tomjones5650]

Well hello Dali, How you doin Dali. It's so nice to have you back where you belong.

[@konstantinkokkorakis1907]

Thanks for this !I knew nothing about any of this .well before I was born .it's always good to be enlightened

[@botatoyy2267]

So,basically Neheru plan was to help to gain Independence for Tibet and slowly annex it like sikkim.?

[@hongqi5734]

You are absolutely right

[@sunkat2337]

Right. Chinese propaganda

[@okfun54573]

Yes.

[@kpsher367]

Nehroo had absolutely no military vision for a nation, he completely failed as a leader and failed his nation and citizens as well.

[@ArmyJames]

“OUR WORDS ARE BACKED BY NUCLEAR WEAPONS!” - Mahatma Gandhi

[@kpsher367]

@A B So now that you are born.. we should have some "hopes"... right?

[@thebestevertherewas]

This video is very biased. So much so that the Publisher knows it and have made it unavailable in India. So that you can't hear the story of the Indian POV. Niether do they contain any erstwhile USSR Pov, in other videos. This is purely CCP propaganda

[@Abhijeetonroll]

Nehru was a visionary and symbol of anti-imperialism and peace. Just beacuse India couldn't keep its territory and let the supressed tibetians into thier homes, doen't make him weak.

[@kpsher367]

@@Abhijeetonroll "Visionary" LOL a VISIONARY would make first his nation strong BECAUSE weak nation can not be developed.

[@fidziek]

17:35 - I met Dalai lama some time ago, very close. Warsaw, Poland.

[@SoloTravelerOffTheBeatenPath]

The Dalai Lama is based. "Europe is for Europeans."

[@space_guy_04]

I love these documentaries, learned more than watching movies.

[@Vikramkumar-cs4sg]

not all of it is true ..its one side of the story..

[@theonlybigsmoke]

@@Vikramkumar-cs4sg still quite interesting also do you have any documentary like this told from India's perspective? Thanks!

[@seansands424]

@@Vikramkumar-cs4sg They need to kick China out of Tibet

[@crypticTV]

19:15 War waiting to happen 31:15 Indians surrender 35:08 Resolution 35:18 2nd offensive 37:28 Humanitarian work

[@superpooper_2030]

Wrong, when mentioning India, always use the word BRAVE like Indians bravely surrender

[@crypticTV]

@@superpooper_2030 lol what 😂🤣🤣 they look scared not brave

[@Jeremy-13312]

​@@superpooper_2030bro they surrendered keep crying

[@louishe2124]

​@@superpooper_2030You're right, they bravely lose the war

[@rsyrsy8543]

You have to salute the Chinese soldiers, their braveness, discipline, sacrifice are amazing. This is how any army should be for their own country.

[@georgevarghese9957]

Congress leadership did not learn comhrehensive lesson from this war. The political parties and politicians were interested still in socialism and vested interest rather than mobilising India as a mighty economic force and military force . Corruption and religious politics coupled with lack of vision politics kept inias back wardness .

[@demorvie]

Religious politics? If anything shunning our religious identity brought us down.

[@lextalionis9642]

"Now that the evil colonialists are gone, lets fight each other!" Same old same old. Lol

[@brucelu4782]

Not totally true, India tries to play the colonialists to force China to accept the British drawn Post Opium War boarder. just google what is the boarder India insists on, which side is unreasonable?

[@Powerofriend]

Nothing holds a people together tighter than a credible foreign threat.

[@anticringepill1313]

@@brucelu4782 according to ladakhis(Indians) there is constant incursions from Chinese into their lands

[@BasedApricot]

Bruce Lu Totally false. The Chinese has been planning to expand their border to northern India for years after conquering and colonising Tibet and East Uyghur. The Chinese are the colonists.

[@brucelu4782]

@@BasedApricot Go ask the people of Manipur and many others along Chinese border, Napal/Bangladesh/Myanmar, everybody hates India why? Because India is the bully. Tibet Chinese and Han Chinese both belong to the Sino-tibet language family, we are from same origin. India belongs to indo-uropean language family, stay away from Tibet.

[@sharedfuture5669]

One thing this video didn't mention is that Dalai treat the ordinary Tibetan ppl as slaves, Chinese call it "农奴制". Another: British Gov't delibrately pushed forward the control line of India side in Tibet when China was fighting against Japan and civil enemies.

[@cortezbell9151]

So, who is China supposed to be liberating👽

[@siddasgupta679]

Communism is the locust and people are their fodder.

[@markarca6360]

@@siddasgupta679 Communism is like a VIRUS.

[@kevin-jg1pt]

@@markarca6360 Oil prices plummeted, US sanctions, and when the Venezuelans were eating garbage, hundreds of thousands of hectares of farmland were in the hands of multinational companies. Is capitalism good? Don't be funny

[@nicator8380]

@@siddasgupta679 Hinduism are caste conflict locust that needed to be destroy.

[@heliosgnosis2744]

@@nicator8380 Any locust that turns against its own nature and onto the nature of another is for certain a locust willing to destroy itself unless it is void of all honor.

[@Incorporatedboy9137492]

Mao constantly becomes "furious" in this documentary.

[@rell0223]

so furious he starved 40 mil of his own people 🤣🤣

[@rolandzhao3173]

In Chinese people's eyes, Mao brought much more good than harm. Most old people who experenced his time respect him.

[@rell0223]

@@rolandzhao3173 *are dead or too scared of the kung fu gestapo to speak up

[@沐风-v3t]

@@rell0223 Don’t impose your thoughts on the Chinese. Old people in that era, including young people now, respect Mao

[@rell0223]

@@沐风-v3t dont you have some szechuan bat to go eat?

[@Goshen-is7sy]

Under rated and no media I suppose.. mysterious.

[@kiff4free554]

This is very important to know, thanks!

[@gentlepopeye323]

Both are cleverly wise when it comes to following the agreement 😊

[@szymongrabarczyk3561]

Cleverly wise is a tautology. Its like saying "buttery butter".

[@justthefacts5008]

Past comment from other youtuber: "Before the British came along, the Indians lived on their side of the mountains and the Chinese on theirs. The border that China recognizes is the first British created and published border which is on the China side of the mountains which were formally no man land. China was busy fighting Japan at the time. Subsequently, the British adjusted the border twice without consultation. India recognizes this amendment but China doesn't" The British is nation should be blamed for this border issue.

[@cosmoray9750]

Govt Sells Oil to China & India while ... kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2fWlKOZqJqZeJo

[@mingxuanfan]

That time China was going through the worst famine, and millions have died of hunger, I can’t believe they fought multiple wars at the same time.

[@性格丶丶]

打的一拳开 毛虽然说自己不是帝皇干的事确实是秦皇汉武干的事情 一个人要干好几代事情还好没翻车

[@yaoypl]

14:31 Korean war? Many images used in this documentary are wrong. These images were from very different period of the history that had nothing to do with the subject of documentary.

[@daispy101]

So many Chinese views and witnesses to the events, but where are the the Indian veterans? The India perspective is reduced to just one talking head historian.

[@sr-71667]

they can talk about how they surrendered.

[@mpalto]

@@sr-71667 yes and then they will talk about how they devastated PLA in 1967, check about that.

[@jvelez5381]

@@sr-71667 fan Wang baning mao.

[@ipfreak]

@RM There are some differences between China and India on the statistics of casualties in the battles at the nadura pass and the zhuola pass: according to Chinese records, 32 Chinese troops were killed and 65 Indian troops were killed in the battle at the nadura pass; In the battle of zhuola pass, 36 Indian soldiers were killed. India's Ministry of Defense announced that 88 Indian soldiers were killed and 163 wounded in the two battles, while 340 Chinese soldiers were killed and 450 wounded

[@ipfreak]

@RM when the term of "India's Ministry of Defense announced", everyone know it is lying.

[@benwong4648]

Most complete review of the India-China 1962 war I have seen. Some of the narrative repears mis-information but the documentary is very good.

[@xinniethep00h]

They should’ve included Indian soldiers to get their view of what happened

[@thebestevertherewas]

This video is very biased. So much so that the Publisher knows it and have made it unavailable in India. So that you can't hear the story of the Indian POV.

[@justthefacts5008]

Past comment from other youtuber: "Before the British came along, the Indians lived on their side of the mountains and the Chinese on theirs. The border that China recognizes is the first British created and published border which is on the China side of the mountains which were formally no man land. China was busy fighting Japan at the time. Subsequently, the British adjusted the border twice without consultation. India recognizes this amendment but China doesn't" The British is nation should be blamed for this border issue.

[@lostvayne104]

​@@xinniethep00h agreed

[@allowedme]

Totally agree with you but a lot of people are still clueless.

[@KKMan20xx]

It is a bit biased when you completely ignore the part where the US was training Tibetan separatists in Colorado in the 50s. Also, you forget to mention the PRC and Tibet had already signed the 17 point plans in May 1951. The McMahon Line cannot be considered valid when it was not negotiated with the government of that country.

[@Ocho-y6j]

typical Western Imperial power "we decide your future without you present at the negotiating table"

[@richardcheese9429]

Oh yes the great glorious Tibetan separatists. Definitely would have been decision makers in a conflict with millions of Chinese soldiers.

[@pich496]

@@Ocho-y6j just look at how the west is trying to sign a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia without Russia.

[@DK-yz9xk]

@@richardcheese9429exactly and you set them up to fail knowingly just as to make use of them to waste more of the china resources. Who is the real evil?

[@simonsmith5003]

​@Ocho-y6j wasn't China acting in the same imperial way as they were always reminding the Western powers of doing then eh!?

[@jiangnorman]

One part in the story usually not mentioned, Dalai Lama's elder brother was actually hired and trained by CIA.

[@emmawang1999]

Dalai himself worked for the CIA, according to the recently declassified documents. He draw an annual salary of $180,000. This was a lot of money in 1960's.

[@ycjason1]

@@emmawang1999 any link to this so others can verify?

[@jianzou3686]

Tibet was simply one of the many time bombs left by the British. It's a scar of British colonialism in many parts of the globe.

[@davedavidh3328]

Britain helped modernise India, and has continued to help many poor countries of the world with its vast overseas aid.

[@jianzou3686]

@@davedavidh3328 you're reiterating political statements from the BBC. Foreign states are demanding return of their national artifacts that the Brits have been stealing for hundreds of years and continuing to do so.

[@lumri2002]

Not really enemies of each other, but rival dispute players over greed for dominion.

[@Thelastdan]

The only greed I see is coming from the Chinese side. It’s not the India taking over Tibet, Taiwan, and the South China Sea. If not for India, China would already have taken over all of Asia.

[@appleriverside4374]

@@Thelastdan LOL Laos Cambodia Korea are still there without India's protection. Don't get over delusional

[@Thelastdan]

@@appleriverside4374 yes because Cambodia and Korea can mobilize a million man army like China can. India is the only nation in Asia who can logistically match Chinas marching army.

[@holyboxer2.072]

China only wants akseqin. This is the channel connecting Xinjiang and Tibet. If China loses akseqin, it means that the road from Tibet to Xinjiang will be three times longer.

[@mountainfrost7095]

@@Thelastdan Not everyone is naive, we know how Sikkim was annexed. All big countries are greedy and bully smaller neighbours.

[@jeremyzapanta8731]

Both sides will hate each other, but mutually love American real estate. LOL

[@adiamondndrough]

As much as you love cheap manufactured goods from their nations to keep Wal marts filled & prices low. Equal trade, plus they pay taxes on those properties, so win win for you. Are you paying taxes in India or China?

[@sidneysun3865]

China doesn’t hate India.

[@mastertrend4685]

You may say Chinese hate Japanese, but cannot say Chinese hate Indians. Actually Chinese don't care about Indians anymore.

[@LionZebra]

You mean they would love American real estate in gas station, convenience store, and dry cleaning businesses?

[@jeremyzapanta8731]

@@LionZebra Some Chinese people and numerous foreign investors are parking up their cash here to hide from the Chinese Communist Party government which explains also the empty homes in China.

[@walterkondor9311]

I'm grateful to have acces to a multitude of knowledge because of this channel.

[@ritemolawbks8012]

They're grateful to have the access to the additional revenue that your viewership brings.

[@walterkondor9311]

My pleasure.

[@Moose6340]

Interesting documentary because it seems to be completely told from the Chinese side.

[@nik007delta]

@lulla David of course.. chinese communists are known for telling the truth. There are Universities in Brussels that are researching why chinese always tell the truth.

[@arareign8944]

You question this Documentary when it was Produce by the West(specifically US) what the heck. India was allied by the US but they didn't help them they just SOLD them GUNS typical Americans money money. Now Modi's term he was just doing what Neru had made thinking US was there to support them.

[@vanillamilk3063]

@@arareign8944 you know this is made now wen america is eh with both countries back then i dont know

[@healer1000040]

And BTW what had from Indian side, humiliating defeat.

[@levonade]

I know

[@marcustulliuscicero.5856]

37:00 minute mark the chinese soldier talks about wanting to slaughter indian prisoners of war

[@sorennilsson9742]

Well they have not changed much it seems. They are in conflict with Vienam, occupying Tibet parts of Mongolia, claim territories in Japan, and several other nations. This is to be expected of any Chinese government. It has to do with their perspective on their security.

[@Shofotolavski]

He can talk frankly about his true thoughts, do you think they really did that? PLA’s discipline is very strong, and there are no such accusations in North Korea or Vietnam.

[@Shofotolavski]

@@johndoe-ss9bz The Chinese academic community was shocked by the patience of the American people and could accept so many deaths, and his government did not have any tendency to shake the ruling foundation.

[@yuanyuanxi262]

based Chinese soldier

[@nayanmalig]

@@sorennilsson9742 LOL as if the bloodthirsty democracy promoters have changed their ways

[@michaellukeman697]

Seeing this for the first time now…I have mutual respect for those Soldiers in terms of how they felt. You go into battle as your country says. You win. And then the politicians who were safely in their beds 🛌 every night “lose the war”. I can understand their feelings in terms of wanting to keep taking action… Interesting 🧐 how yet another incident that is seemingly “lost save for the history books” reflects the adage of “If you fail to earn your history, you will be doomed to repeat it” or words to that effect…

[@marke9036]

Biggest takeaway from this point is *till this day Sino - Indian border issues still have not resolved* thanks Mao for your weird strategy giving up land even after it been taken and *resulted in Sino - Russia split*

[@cosmoray9750]

US meddling is not mentioned. " The CIA Tibetan program was a nearly two decades long anti-Chinese covert operation focused on Tibet which consisted of "political action, propaganda, paramilitary and intelligence operations" based on U.S. government arrangements made with brothers of the 14th Dalai Lama, who was not initially aware of them. "

[@erikarichards528]

Me: *sees the title of the video* Also me: "Ah. So basically modern day India and China."

[@aryan_kumar]

SVen KrULes 5 months ago Me: *sees the title of the video* Also me: "Ah. So basically modern day India and China."

[@popatyourecords]

i hadnt a clue this had happened

[@bicyclist2]

That's intentional.

[@TheBinoyVudi]

The most important conflict of this century -- India vs china

[@popatyourecords]

@D Theresa all books are written by victors and based on lies so no i wont do that but il carry on my 12 year internet research into what really happened and is happening

[@fatmeatlovergames4560]

@@TheBinoyVudi not at all lol, if ww2 only had germany and france involved it would be like this, it was over and done in a single month.

[@andysu6809]

Yo between 02:58 and 03:02 Fker in uniform just pushed normal civilian, can anyone recognize his uniform. Wat faction,country,state, party is he?

[@firetree2007]

Every Indian should watch youtube "India's Stand on China Border Irrational but Nehru's Handling Was Irresponsible: Avtar Singh Bhasin" and read the book, Avtar Singh Bhasin's braveness of admitting that for all these years it was India, especially Nehru, made mistakes and caused unnecessary war and bad relationship btw the two countries, made me into tears.

[@jacobrivers5728]

China needs to return Aksai Chin stolen from India in 1962 and then the two Asian countries can be friends again.

[@firetree2007]

@@jacobrivers5728 no we do not , go get it, hah:) we do not want to be your friend. hah :)

[@jacobrivers5728]

@@firetree2007 This is going to end in tragedy for China like it did for Japan in 1945. China will be carved up into several pieces and its wealth shared between America, Britain, France, Australia and Japan. Tibet and Xinjiang will also become independent. The day will come when America, Japan, Australia, Britain and France will attack China from the east, Russia will attack from the north and India from the west. China's making the mistake of thinking it's invincible, however the world will eventually give China a lethal dose of reality.

[@firetree2007]

@@jacobrivers5728 big mouth, no time to waste on you, just enjoy this : Oct 10th 2021, The Express Tribune, with title "Indians furious......."

[@avishkumar8231]

Can you briefly tell me what India did? Why China took on Tibet?

[@obriets]

China seems to have India completely surrounded these days.

[@basedsalty6970]

They both have nuclear weapons so it's a stalemate

[@obriets]

@Fumanchu1 5150 I don’t see India building bases or commercial dependencies North, South, East, and West of india. What I see is a country that is asleep, particularly to the danger of soft power.

[@obriets]

I tell you, I can’t wait to stop seeing Made in China on everything. Really looking forward to buying goods exclusively from democracies. We have spent years treating totalitarians as equals instead of well-deserved pariahs.

[@b.griffin317]

Problem is India straddles China's supply lines and has a considerable Navy to do something about it if it pleased.

[@basedsalty6970]

@@b.griffin317 China can't even land a aircraft on a boat yet

[@ypaid]

Not only Indian, those who chose Challenging PLA also chose death.

[@MerryChristmasDec25]

Peace to you all. Pray the Chaplet of the Divine Mercy for the sick & dying, for protection, to prepare your soul.

[@sha9543]

Don't tell me what to do

[@thisistheirnewhoax8048]

Ah, this reminds me of the time I was carrying a picture of Chairman Mao and ran into John Lennon of the Beatles. What he said to me was discouraging.

[@DanielGenis5000]

John Lennon had some sense

[@rickycastillo6831]

What did he say guy?

[@lunafringe10]

communist swine, thats basically it. slaughtering their own people

[@bradmossman7201]

The Soviets never trusted Mao. They initially backed Jiang Kai Shek. And they had close ties to Nehru.

[@shawnz3307]

Well all started when China refused the Soviet to put army in China, you know, like the US and Soviet did to other free country~

[@PatrickFan123]

USSR wanted to build a naval base in China to threat the US and Japan, but China said no. So the conflict began.

[@freedombro]

No honor among theives after all

[@cosmoray9750]

Provocations Over Taiwan kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH20hpeAe9aeias

[@PatrickFan123]

Quite the opposite. Just think about the opposite logic: The Soviets never trusted Chiang Kai Shek, so it turned to support Mao.

[@s.h.mshahazom9202]

This documentary is great.But there is a huge mistake.They showed east pakistan (now Bangladesh) in the india's map.

[@stefanschleps8758]

Give it time.

[@quisqueyanguy120]

Back then Bangladesh was still East Pakistan, the independence of Bangladesh came with the Third Indo-Pakistani war in 1971 when the Indian Army invaded East Pakistan and with the help of the bengali militias liberated the country and thus Bangladesh was born.

[@thebestevertherewas]

This video is very biased. So much so that the Publisher knows it and have made it unavailable in India. So that you can't hear the story of the Indian POV.

[@DwayneIsKing]

2:59 DAMN bro chill 😭

[@n.gvideoproduction9740]

Great salute to Comrade Mao Salute to People Liberation Army From sri lanka 🇨🇳♥️🇱🇰

[@stevensibbet5869]

Doesn'rt China rule Sri Lanka now?

[@Logic78600]

You fool

[@dinuxplay8003]

@@stevensibbet5869 exactly man. I am Sri Lankan as well, but it is because of people like this our country is getting sold and they don't stand against it as proven from the OP's comment. The wanna be Castros in the country are actually ruining it.

[@chiragmehta8212]

That’s why India should not help you in any way

[@n.gvideoproduction9740]

@@chiragmehta8212 Sri Lanka does not need India's help. Sri Lanka does not need help from India, which is ruled by corrupt politicians. India is giving help to the Tamil people and their Indian expansionism. China's presence with Sri Lanka has hindered India from expanding its power in the neighboring countries of the Indian Ocean💯💯

[@andrewdeen1]

wow! please, PLEASE upload the 3rd episode!

[@al_khalid_248]

Every time I see a map in the video I wonder, where the heck did they get the idea that Bangladesh was a part of India during those days ? Sloppy work there

[@vijaysimha2423]

It will become part of GREATER INDIA very soon. Don't worry so much

[@Rohilla313]

@@vijaysimha2423 And India will become part of Greater China. Don’t worry so much.

[@monkeygaming4837]

@@Rohilla313 and China will be become the part of great America soon

[@monkeygaming4837]

@Walter Wayne but there government do ccp

[@monkeygaming4837]

@Walter Wayneyeah Ik

[@iamsheep]

This video kind of leaves out lots of relevant information. It wasn't Mao suddenly deciding Tibet was a part of China. It had been a part of China since the Qing Dynasty and was also considered, along with the whole of Mongolia and Taiwan, a part of China according to then rolling party the KMT during the Republic of China days.

[@hazeshi6779]

That was then, now is now

[@Asskiller2011]

@@hazeshi6779 Now and future Tibet still part of China.

[@robertoshea9825]

​@@hazeshi6779doesn't matter.It's still part of China

[@User-357dgjkitdvkkoohgj]

@@hazeshi6779and 1962 is 1962😂

[@paulking54]

Why are we virtually only hearing chinese soldiers commentary,none of which have anything contrary to say about Chinas roll in the whole standoff. Lets have some more balanced statements ,please.

[@CarlosGonzalez-tv3vw]

Because China controls Hollywood now

[@laughy38247357075834]

Tired of seeing comments like this. Read the title. It is supposed to be about Mao.

[@叶文洁不爱吃胖头鱼]

Because China crushed India in that war

[@matthew5386]

@@CarlosGonzalez-tv3vw no they dont

[@matthew5386]

Better then hearing american propaganda about asia or africa

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

Too nice history video rarely known about it thanks for sending

[@michaeltagud992]

Mao decided to withdraw coz that time he had no better relations with UN. he also in bad modes with Nikita Chruschev... He knows he had no support if USA will help india. he know soviet will never be available at that time..

[@lawrence227]

Big nation never make decisions on behalf of others interest. Chinese withdraw simply because the Southern Tibet is impossible in supplies logistic. It took 3 months (and consume half of the supplies) just to reach Tibet from China inland, but only 1 month from India side. Before the war broke out, China even have to ship their supplies to Tibet through India harbor. That's why India opposed the railway built into Tibet connecting China inland.

[@nunyabeeswax3936]

India had excellent taste in cars.he was riding in a full sized Dodge! =) India changed all this with the last skirmish!

[@ben-jam-in6941]

Near the end of the film from the look on his face Khrushchev was just not impressed with the little red book waving. It might have been prior to the little red book waving thing so if it wasn’t that then it was the worship like idolizing of Mao even then he didn’t seem so impressed with. That might have been the visit Mao took him on the infamous swimming trip.

[@009radix]

Not only that, but Mao had always thought that he was next in seniority and should rightfully inherit the mantle of leading the communist revolution after Stalin's death. He didn't take to Khrushchev at all, clearly that sentiment went both ways. Khrushchev didn't agree with Mao's upstart style of peasant socialism.

[@seanwon3266]

So draw a conclusion, Inda wanted Tibet become a cusion between China and India, just like USSR made Mongolia independent and becomes a cusion between China and Russia. However, they were not as powerful as USSR.

[@justthefacts5008]

Past comment from other youtuber: "Before the British came along, the Indians lived on their side of the mountains and the Chinese on theirs. The border that China recognizes is the first British created and published border which is on the China side of the mountains which were formally no man land. China was busy fighting Japan at the time. Subsequently, the British adjusted the border twice without consultation. India recognizes this amendment but China doesn't" The British is nation should be blamed for this border issue.

[@IchiroSakamoto]

@@justthefacts5008 typical british....drawing arbitrary borders like babies with a crayon

[@ouronlyhome2462]

@@justthefacts5008 totally agree, the Brits create conflicts wherever they go.

[@quissbird-10]

​@@justthefacts5008 wow thanks let's blame all the problem on the British as we fight each other, right China?

[@邕江小黑龙]

Chairman Mao：“I've been thinking for three days and three nights, but I still can't figure out why Nehru did this to us.”

[@mannydelfin8656]

Just wandering what common language both India and China used to communicate during the cold war

[@pioeugenio5267]

Its in english i guess!!!! Hehehebe

[@marioreyes5816]

English duh

[@mannydelfin8656]

@@marioreyes5816. You're guess is wrong. China and India used sign language.

[@mannydelfin8656]

@@pioeugenio5267 nice try but sorry that's wrong. Both of them used sign language.

[@thebestevertherewas]

Sign language. As India didn't want to depict that they were working for the west. India was a very good ally of USSR and their views at the time were very Anti- Colonial.( US,UK and Europe hates India for this), while USSR backed India.

[@johnrenzoaviso632]

Nice presentation. ♥️ 🇮🇳

[@alfarabi73]

16:15 Kissinger says the same about the Chinese: Because CCP exercises totalitarian control over China, it assumes the US President does the same. As a result, Mao and Zhou consistently interpreted various pronouncements by prominent US media sources as official statements of American policy - directed by Nixon.

[@dabo5078]

After the Facebook leaks from Musk and Snowden+ Assange we could safely say Mao’s assumption for America at least is correct

[@foodparadise5792]

You would be naive to think the US president has real power. cia and fbi on surface is under the president, but from previous incidents(like jfk) it obviously controlls by other hidden force.

[@David-hk3ly]

The whole fiasco was caused by the British imperialists in 1914 when they arbitrarily annexed Tibetan territory in order to forestall Russian pretensions in India. The territory annexed, Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh, had never belonged to India. Yet India regards them as "non-negotiable" How can "democratic" India insist that territory illegaly taken by the British Raj is not negotiable?? A quid pro quo exchange of land is the only way out short of war.

[@willengel2458]

here is another video by an Indian author, he has a different take on the incident: kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJKwYXZvg9qhe8k

[@paulstephen3257]

Tibet was semi-independent and was never really controlled in any way by the republic of china. Therefore, china claiming Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh because some time in the past they were part of tibet is a bit laughable . Aksai Chin was never part of a china. It was desolate land with almost no people ,and the only fort built there in modern times was built by the maharaja of Kashmir who claimed the territory. Even when the British proposed the Macartney Macdonald which would have given aksai chin to the Qing, the Chinese never responded or accepted the line so aksai chin was left inside British India.

[@David-hk3ly]

@@paulstephen3257 Another apologist for British imperialism and Indian expansionism.

[@paulstephen3257]

@@David-hk3ly Can you reply with an actual cogent argument instead of resorting to ad hominems. Also, I bet you also defend Russian and Chinese imperalism

[@shakti12321]

China accepted MacMohan line as border not with India but with Myanmmar.....they needed some pretext to attack...watching weak leadership in India they attacked......all intelligence sources constantly warned of Chinese troop building but stupid Neheru kept on singing HINDI CHINE BHAI BHAI (indian and chinese are brothers),...guess what most of chinese hardware to attack India arrived in Tibet from China not by any road but by Indian port Kolkotta

[@beeforuever]

Guess there are still a few facts buried in this heavily biased video that appears to be impartial. First , India's support of Tibet's rebellion and forward policy. Second, China beat India in both west and east front. Third, they returned the POWs and captured goods, withdrew to the line before the conflicts.

[@suckmemore]

you have left the cia out! ha................

[@anjalicgirl]

China cannot be trusted. Ask Sri Lanka and African countries about the debt trap.

[@uzmanbaloch148]

China should have with drawn with the condition of negotiations to solve the problem of border dispute between the boardering countries to save the combatant comrades from humaliàtion.

[@libertyprime2013]

Communists detected on American soil. Lethal force engaged!

[@mafelfanai]

Remember, there can never be a truly unbiased history.

[@周期]

same indian is frist civilization ，the birthplace of mankind ，India ruled America

[@shawnushyarov4584]

Good documentary 👏🏻

[@jamesmathew136]

Please read Bertrand Russell's book Unarmed victory to know about the efforts made by Russell to bring the war to an end. Both Nehru and Zou-en-Lai were his friends.

[@blackjackreward4456]

13:55 This footage onward is the same as the one used briefly on a documentary on the Sino-Japanese War, in the late thirties. I'm guessing it belongs in the '50s-'60s, i.e., here.

[@tonym842]

Why is there zero mention of the CIA training Tibetan separatists and the Dalai Lama? His brother wrote his memoirs years later regretting their involvement with the CIA.

[@yariahtaylor2266]

Mao just had to teach Neru a lesson that sometimes the pen is mightier than the sword. He should have took the offer to give up land at least until your forces are stronger. Mao could have wiped you out completely.

[@leah.3905]

Well said!

[@StrangerOnTheWeb]

Wiped out? The US and her allies would've never allowed that.

[@sharedfuture5669]

@@StrangerOnTheWeb Just like US and her allies never allow North Korea to occupy the South and stepped into Korea battlefield and beaten by the poorest Chinese Army...

[@krishanrathi9119]

@@sharedfuture5669 India was not Korea and Indian army was no joke, with British and American help and weapons they would have pushed the Chinese back to tibet, the same army performed exceptionally well in 2nd world war in Asia and Africa, there is a reason Mao turned back when Nehru appealed to America.

[@sharedfuture5669]

@@krishanrathi9119 Oh, friend, sadly, India is a joke among the world whether it is in the politics, economy, culture or millitary...

[@raquelr8775]

I did not know that Indian and China shared this history. Interesting indeed.

[@mana-zt1lb]

Yeahhh

[@amossutandi]

the british took land from china when it ruled india and made china get addicted to opium. when the british left, india didn't return the land to china, but chose to keep what the british stole. british are the root cause of much of the conflicts and border disputes in the world.

[@102lee2]

There is a book

[@plendafuture7451]

There is a book called China's india war . Records every detail .

[@mymvds]

The author is Neville Maxwell, the book called The India China War. This book had not been allowed to sell in India.

[@okee7]

@@mymvds Nevill Maxwell's book is allowed to sell in India have read it! India is a free democrtatic county and its system accepts critisism unlike China. Like this documentary shows it's citizens are free to protest or oppose (Titeban cause), which cannot be fathomed as appropriate by a belligerant dictatorial Chairman Mao or Premier Zhou Enlai . As far as thiis book goes, it sources all its information from Indian reports (some leaked), defence official and politicians and no input form then Chinese leaders or Generals; which is obvious! Maxwell was an admirer of Maoist Communist China and known critic of India who also apprently predicted the spilt on division of India in the late 60's. Maxwell blames India for the "Forward Policy' but so rightly pointed by this documentary that this policy was adopted by China too (first); so what would any nation do? And Neville Maxwell apparently lives Australia; I'm not sure if he's now going to write a book blaming Australia for the on going cold war between them and President Xi Jinping's new China!

[@yijiang5397]

@@okee7 So funny to see someone who thinks Tibetans want to become slaves again like they were in Qing Dynasty.

[@digitalpostman]

@@yijiang5397 the low class Indian are still sales nowadays, but they seem to enjoy it everyday due to karma mindset.

[@JeffreyBarkdull]

Me after seeing a scene that starts at 24:40 - Why would India reject this deal, because it seemed like a fair deal to me!?

[@sfjava6239]

Nehru has too much ego.

[@vanillamilk3063]

its because of intercomplicated political and social issues India didn't want to back since the wanted to up morales

[@JeffreyBarkdull]

Translation Vanilla Milk?

[@vanillamilk3063]

@@JeffreyBarkdull im too lazy just search it up lol im tired i might explain in morning

[@JeffreyBarkdull]

I’ll wait Vanilla Milk, because I don’t even know where to start

[@marke9036]

Biggest takeaway from this point is *till this day Sino - Indian border issues still have not resolved* thanks Mao for your weird strategy giving up land even after it been taken and *resulted in Sino - Russia split*

[@markarca6360]

From Nehru to Modi, they are still fighting with each other.

[@jesusislordsavior6343]

@Paris Hilton China wants the whole world to be part of its economy. Communism, capitalism, what's the diff? It's all about STUFF being more important than people. (Luke 12:15) 'Beware, and be on your guard against eveyr form of greed, for not even when one has an abundance does his life consist of his possessions.'

[@evelynzhang1240]

@Paris Hilton India said otherwise www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/6577/Joint_Statement_of_the_Republic_of_India_and_the_Peoples_Republic_of_China "The Indian side reiterated that it recognized the Tibet Autonomous Region as part of the territory of the People's Republic of China and that it did not allow Tibetans to engage in anti-China political activities in India. The Indian side recalled that India was among the first countries to recognize that there is one China and its one China policy remains unaltered. The Indian side stated it would continue to abide by its one China policy. The Chinese side expressed its appreciation for the Indian positions."

[@samjewellery3336]

Communism principal is looting.where the communism,there is no peace.

[@vp922]

@@evelynzhang1240 free Tibet!!

[@casecao8412]

@@vp922 Lol good luck with that

[@charlesfu6790]

很多影像资料出自抗美援朝！Some videos were from the Korean War!

[@aileenukara6598]

Thank you

[@Junaid_Paramberi]

actually this war changed india. after this war india decided boost its military and nuclear program. look at now where is indian and china

[@therealdeal2163]

India may have boosted its military but so has china , basically nothing has changed ...

[@zouzhengliling]

Without 1962, India will also develop military and nuclear weapons

[@foxtrotwhiskey874]

where is india today? pls elaborate.