Tiny black holes are more powerful than supermassive ones.

[@kamrynsikes]

“Could swallow entire stars in seconds” I supose accretion disks are just there for the aesthetics.

[@damanybrown5036]

Lol 😂

[@mekile616_]

We need to figure out how to flip the black hole and get the energy from it.

[@LifesNotHereToSatisfyYou]

Throw a Nokia black hole will have trouble with it and spit it out resulting in it flipping inside out

[@sashasofman]

Could swallow entire stars? Jeez- Louise. My GF didn’t swallow for entire year.

[@Undyfundy99]

Get out

[@bethmcculligh1930]

You're my favorite...Beyond Evil KZbin channel voice ❤

[@JKDVIPER]

There's only one or two ways they release energy, 1. X RAYS they can escape. 2. THERMALS heat/energy/entropy is found in matter and all it's interactions. The accretion disk can express heat entropy to the empty space surrounding the hole core because it's displaced by the denser BOSON CONDENSATE inside. So that makes the inner core like a low point pipe, or drain, and the outside accretion disk could be considered NUCLEAR LAVA in the sense that it's not just fire, or heat, but sometimes SOLID TO THE TOUCH, picture melted plastic, thick, superheated. So it's dense heat. But the earth, which we require to live, it's moon, the sun and everything else in our solar system would need to escape Sagittarius a star in order to fly to a black hole like GAIAI let's say. You'd need to escape the galaxy then barrel ass 😂in at it. But once you get there you'd have no escape velocity. Because remember, objects in space mess with each other by chasing in elliptical patterns, but they're flying or floating too. It's a pickle no doubt. In order to use a black hole, we might/could try rocketing straight at SAG but that would take 25,000 light years. 😂❤

[@hatulmadan7945]

Why smaller cup gets cooler faster than the bigger one? Its mistake. Bigger one contains more energy. But it also has a bigger square to loose its energy. The right ansewer: they both will get cooles at the same speed.

[@Tar-Von]

It's not really a mistake. The smaller cup has a smaller surface area exposed to the surrounding air, allowing for quicker heat loss compared to the larger one.

[@hatulmadan7945]

@Tar-Von Hi, bro. Thanks for clarification. But can you describe the phisics of these process? As far as I know, the surface has constant coefficient of heat loss. And this coefficient doe not depends on square. The heat loss does depends on square - the more square, the more loss.

[@damanybrown5036]

Why did my phone not implode? I wonder 🤔

[@emmanuelmwakibolwa735]

Why then the stars are just running past it and not swallowed???

[@KarlKelly-x1v]

Erroneous. Black holes the size of a grain of sand are not as powerful as a supermassive black hole and they evaporate too quickly to be a power source for any length of time.

[@jacklgeiger3944]

It would also pull the Earth 🌎 into Itself. This causing a effect on humanity.Not a good time.

[@masklessninja]

Espresso 🤤

[@boo-zp4lh]

My precious...😂

[@abohmaid]

سبحان الخالق المبدع

[@Mehdi-ab12]

أوافقك اخوي ❤

[@kengbrissy3074]

Ew

[@Mehdi-ab12]

@@kengbrissy3074 peace be upon you buddy, Can you please clarify what you said ? , i didn't understand you and sorry for disturbing you !!

[@torhildsvendsen9424]

@ @

[@miguelmedina1991]

Like your mama

[@DemonKing-yt]

Bullshit😅

[@carcolhdev]

Only if we can use hawking radiation as energy but if that thing is anywhere near the solar system we're fucked

[@miguelmedina1991]

A black hole the size of a grain of sand is it going to still absorb the entire solar system that's the thing with black holes they are always growing because they are always adding to their Mass Photon particles AKA light is turn back into matter under the massive gravitational pressure of a black hole