Titanic's Descent

  Рет қаралды 115,464

TornadoHarry

TornadoHarry

Күн бұрын

Music credits: • Final Crash Animation ...
Model: TornadoHarry and JealouseStatement
Animation: TornadoHarry
Sound effects: Royalty Free Sounds

Пікірлер: 240
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
If you're having a hard time viewing the video, I would turn up the resolution of the video. KZbin likes to compress the video quality unless it is as the maximum resolution. Thank you all for the support!
@colegensch787
@colegensch787 29 күн бұрын
If we had the technology back then to see this happening underwater I'm sure it would be pretty chaotic to see and scary at the same time watching a ship rip and tear itself apart as it falls to the bottom of the ocean with relentless force.
@DC10_AV
@DC10_AV 4 күн бұрын
Hey, I have a question, where do you get the metal strain sound effects from?
@colegensch787
@colegensch787 4 күн бұрын
@@DC10_AV i like to know that one myself.
@maggy154
@maggy154 Ай бұрын
badabing badaboom, that's what we're looking for
@Bbc418
@Bbc418 Ай бұрын
Someone here is watching too many documentaries 🙄
@Blu3_SK33
@Blu3_SK33 Ай бұрын
I thought it was I'm blue da ba dee da ba die I'm blue da ba dee da ba die
@Blu3_SK33
@Blu3_SK33 Ай бұрын
​@@Bbc418or not enough...
@lune78
@lune78 Ай бұрын
I always think of that documentary too lol
@SA1NT53
@SA1NT53 Ай бұрын
Anyone who gets this reference is a certified nerd
@soundwavesuperior7522
@soundwavesuperior7522 Ай бұрын
The visuals of such a massive ship being absolutely dwarfed by the seemingly bottomless descent is very unsettling
@Stem_Cie
@Stem_Cie 23 күн бұрын
It would make a cool lamp
@zmirecki
@zmirecki Ай бұрын
It's fascinating that, amidst all that pressure and destruction, there are still drinking glasses upright in the wreck that look as they were left on the surface.
@McLarenMercedes
@McLarenMercedes Ай бұрын
Why would drinking glasses be affected by pressure? I assume you mean the water pressure and it's only deadly when there's a huge difference between the inner pressure of say a contained space such as inside a submarine (often closer to 1 atmosphere) and the ever increasing outer pressure (striving to fill that void). If the inner pressure is the same as the outer pressure then saturation divers can enter a diving bell, close it, raise the pressure (gradually and slowly of course) to the level of the depth they will be diving/working at, lower the diving bell and open the bottom hatch and exit the diving bell. A glass however has no cavities and as it fills with water there's no pressure difference for there is no contained space with surface level pressure. This is obvious in regards to the different conditions of the bow and stern part of the wreck. Almost all of the bow section was already filled with water when it plunged below the surface and hence there were no air-pockets/contained space to give in to the outer pressure forces. The stern section however had a cargo hold which had been shut and this became a contained space with surface level pressure. As the stern sank ever deeper the pressure gradient on this space increased until it violently imploded leaving the stern a twisted mess. As for the destruction. Well, it wasn't spread evenly all over the superstructure of the ship once it hit the bottom. Some parts took the brunt of the forces. Others experienced minor forces. Hence why some of the glasses are intact. Air disaster investigators find several intact objects where planes have crashed at high speed with no survivors. I'm fairly certain that what is still somewhat intact is found in the bow section of the wreck.
@DavidWilliams-so2dy
@DavidWilliams-so2dy Ай бұрын
I wonder how long someone lucky enough (or unlucky) to have found an air pocket in the stern would survive before the implosion?
@Garsons-oq4lh
@Garsons-oq4lh Ай бұрын
​​​​​​​@@McLarenMercedesThe glass and carafe were found way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) on an upright wash stand on shelves that would've had guard rails. But no way the higher up heavier carafe would have stayed in place if the bow took such a steep angle at 0:12. Also, the stand faced forward toward the bow so no way.
@ReynardIsTrying
@ReynardIsTrying Ай бұрын
@@DavidWilliams-so2dyI heard it imploded after 10-30 seconds underwater
@GazBeasley
@GazBeasley 17 күн бұрын
@@DavidWilliams-so2dyin reality i dont think there was an implosion. Implosion’s generally happen when a water and air tight container is no longer strong enough to hold out the pressure outside. Titanic’s stern wouldnt have been 100% air tight (even in air pockets). I’ve read (dont know for sure its true) that the extreme damage to the stern is all blown outward, not inward like an implosion. The inrush of water being forced into the wreck faster than the air could escape by the accelerated sinking would have blown out any windows and weak areas of the ship and because the stern wasnt stream lined anything that caused drag in the water got torn off. (Im not an expert so dont know for sure what im saying is 100% true or if im explaining it right but i did read something to that effect)
@mergimvllasa7577
@mergimvllasa7577 Ай бұрын
I can't believe you found the ost used for the 2012 sinking animation. I thought I was the only one who thought it was good.
@BucNasT
@BucNasT Ай бұрын
Imagine finding this fucking thing at the bottom of an abysmal ocean. So eerie and amazing.
@StuyJamaicaYonkers
@StuyJamaicaYonkers Ай бұрын
You wouldn’t, it’s like 1-2 miles under
@BucNasT
@BucNasT Ай бұрын
@@StuyJamaicaYonkers I didn't mean me personally. I was referencing the person that did find it.
@StuyJamaicaYonkers
@StuyJamaicaYonkers Ай бұрын
@@BucNasT don matter who I was jus sayin
@theminingassassin16
@theminingassassin16 Ай бұрын
Such a tragic ending for a ship that was built for greatness.
@jesslambert4819
@jesslambert4819 Ай бұрын
Built for greatness and destroyed by ego and stupidity.
@theminingassassin16
@theminingassassin16 Ай бұрын
@@jesslambert4819 If by "destroyed by ego and stupidity," you mean that Titanic was believed to be unsinkable and the crew was careless, I'm afraid to inform you that is incorrect. Titanic was never called unsinkable, but "practically unsinkable" (in other words, nearly unsinkable). Also, she wasn't the only ship referred to as such. Cunard Line's R.M.S Lusitania was also dubbed practically unsinkable, and she sank after being torpedoed during WWI. This was during a time when almost everyone was incredibly confident in maritime safety, and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster. As for Titanic's crew, they were some of the best at sea during the time. It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night, as he wasn't alive to defend himself at the inquiries. However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security.
@McLarenMercedes
@McLarenMercedes Ай бұрын
To OP. What "greatness" ? The Cunard Liners Mauretania and Lusitania were *faster* (and more profitable) and the Olympic class liners which White Star Line built lost the record of the world's largest ship in 1913 already to the German ocean liner SS Imperator and its slightly larger sister ship SS Vaterland. After them ever larger and faster ocean liners were launched. When it came to luxury the ocean liners improved upon that pretty much yearly as more modern and technically superior ships emerged. RMS Aquitania launched in 1913 had much emphasis on luxury in an effort by Cunard to beat White Star Line there too. She was much loved by her passengers who called her "the Ship Beautiful". And she served *both* in WWI and WWII. White Star Line struggled economically even before the Olympic Class liners were launched and once motorships (diesel-electric and steam-turbines) appeared in the 1930's the old coal-burned ocean liners which were manually fed with coal instantly became *outdated* . Hence why those who still were around were scrapped in the 1930's. Coal was no longer easily available (hence spiraling costs) not to mention that coal needs large and bulky coal bunkers. Fact is they were so huge they took up 1/6th of the total cargo of any coal-burning ship. Motorships don't need a huge labor force feeding coal manually either. No, heres the harsh reality: Titanic is remembered *because* she sank and a lot of people died on her maiden voyage. But had she never sunk and missed the iceberg? She would have gone down as a footnote in shipping history. On her own she wouldn't have stood out. The *sinking* made her immortal. I reiterate: The Cunard Liners held the Blue RIband and were faster and more profitable (and shipping lines are ultimate in it for the *business* ). Larger, more technically advanced and luxurious ships were constantly being designed and built. So unless Titanic would have served with distinction during WWI as a hospital or troop carrying ship I can't see any greatness being in her future. Certainly not in a way which sets her out from the other ocean liners. Assertions backed up by nothing valid or without historical scope is a myopic outlook on anything, never mind famous disasters.
@McLarenMercedes
@McLarenMercedes Ай бұрын
@@theminingassassin16 "It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night" Not quite true. Titanic had received several warnings from other ships about icebergs which had been spotted. During the inquiry following the disaster it emerged that Captain Smith had intended to go around the area with the ice which would have resulted in a minor detour. Captain Smith informed Bruce Ismay of this who realized that this would mean that Titanic would arrive in New York several hours late. In fact it would most likely arrive at port late in the evening. This didn't sit well with Ismay at all. How so? If Titanic arrived late in the evening it would be dark and nobody would witness the ship arriving except for the dock workers. Ismay wanted all the headlines and he wouldn't get those if everybody in New York had already gone to bed. Even worse was that all the passengers would be ready to go to sleep as well and therefore would be eager to get off the ship as soon as possible and hurry to their homes, hotels or in the case of the many immigrants the processing station at Ellis Island. *Nobody* likes to finish a travel late in the evening or at night. It's not so strange that late night flights are cheaper today. The press would most certainly not turn up either, hence no great headline in the newspapers. But if Titanic maintained its course it would arrive in New York during the day and people and the press would gather to see her. This of course meant going through an area they *all knew* had several icebergs. This decision was Captain Smith's but Bruce Ismay, the company president, exerted pressure on the captain to do so. Since the captain has the final say on his ship he was blamed and Bruce Ismay let off lightly. Most however knew *he* was the real reason this decision was taken in the first place. Another factor to consider is that Titanic was *already* delayed and late as her maiden voyage had been postponed due to the Olympic colliding with HMS Hawke and needed urgent repairs. The 1912 Coal strike also meant that there was a shortage of coal and White Star Line had to reroute the deliveries allocated to their other ships so that Titanic could have enough for her maiden voyage. This also meant that these White Star liners had to stay in harbor and their voyages were postponed. Some passengers however got rebooked on the Titanic... Another mishap which might have ended so much worse is when Titanic steamed out of Southampton. The ship City of New York snapped her moorings as Titanic passed and nearly collided with her. Fortunately a quick-thinking thug saw what was happening and prevented a minor disaster. So the maiden voyage delayed be almost a month, coal worker strike leading to cancelled journeys for other White Star ships and the near collision with the ship City of New York were already too many delays and bad news for Ismay. He felt that he could ill-afford another fiasco. The ship arriving delayed by half a day therefore wasn't an alternative Ismay was willing to accept. Yet another factors influencing Ismay's decision was that White Star Line had economical difficulties before they built the Olympic Class liners and gambled on them becoming huge successes. Titanic's maiden voyage had to be resounding success. This ship did also NOT go at full speed that night. Not all of the boilers were lit for starters. And what kind of a captain and crew would push a brand-new ship at top speed anyway? New ships have to be broken in first. Same a new cars or any new equipment. Full speed also burns a lot of coal and Titanic was short on it anyway following the strike. High speed is correct but Titanic wasn't going full speed ahead. "and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster" Really? You know White Star Line alone had lost 4 ships before the Titanic... Atlantic sank in 1873. 562 people died. Naronic was a cargo and livestock ship that disappeared in 1893 while sailing from Liverpool to New York. To this day it is uncertain what happened to Naronic. Suevic sank in 1907. Republic (II), sailing from New York to the Mediterranean, in heavy fog, was smashed into by another ship, causing Republic to slowly sink in 1909. On 24 January, Republic sank stern first; at 15,378 tons, she was the largest ship to have sunk until then. Shipping disasters werent unusual in the early 1900's... Examples (all a few years before Titanic) 1902 Camorta - The ship was caught in a cyclone and sank in the Irrawaddy Delta on 6 May with the loss of all 655 passengers and 82 crew. 1904 General Slocum - The paddle steamer caught fire and sank in New York City's East River on 15 June. 1,029 people were killed, making it New York City's greatest loss of life until the September 11 attacks. 1904 Norge - On 28 June the ship ran aground on Helen's Reef near Rockall. 635 people were killed; 160 survivors spent as much as eight days in open boats before rescue. 1906 Sirio - On 4 August the cargo steamship sank after running aground and suffered a boiler explosion on the Punta Hormigas, a reef off Hormigas Island, two and a half miles east of Cape Palos, Cartagena, Spain. 293, including Italian and Spanish emigrants bound for Argentina, of the 645 aboard were lost. Other sources put the death toll at over 500. 1909 Waratah - About 27 July, the steamship, en route from Australia to London, was lost without trace off Durban on the east coast of South Africa. All 211 aboard were lost. Naming but a few... "and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster" Given the light of the other disasters I find that statement hard to believe. "However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security." 1. He knew there were icebergs in the area. 2. He listened to Ismay's advice of arriving in New York on time to avoid more bad headlines or lack of headlines at all. 3. Captain Smith was a veteran from an era in which disaster were common. What false sense of security could he possibly have had with his experience? He gambled and rolled the dice believing any iceberg wuld be spotted in time... Please verify all the sunken ships I bring up here.
@theminingassassin16
@theminingassassin16 Ай бұрын
To person with Mercedes in their name: Think what you want , but this is how I see it. Olympic and Titanic were considered groundbreaking when they were put into service, and their luxury was well received by passengers. Also, they weren’t made to be faster than Cunard’s Greyhound class. In fact, no ship would beat Mauretania’s speed record until around 20 years after she got the Blue Riband from Lusitania. White Star Line knew they couldn’t beat the speed record, so they focused on everything else, and I feel like they did it very well. Also, the German ships were built to be larger than the Olympic class because that was the name of the game when it came to building ships during the time. One company would do something, and then everyone else would try to top it. I would also like to point out that if Britannic was completed and put into service as she was intended, she would have likely been able to rival other ships of that generation in luxury. People also remember Olympic for being one of the greatest ships of her time, and I feel like Titanic would have been the same if she didn’t sink. Maybe she wouldn’t have reached the same level of fame, but I think she would have been close. Also, I don’t see how WSL’s financial situation has anything to do with Titanic’s demise. Finally, Olympic, along with many other ships like Vaterland (renamed Leviathan when she was taken by the Americans after the war) was refitted with new boilers that burned oil instead of coal after WWI, so I think you may have been mistaken on that point.
@rbsk999
@rbsk999 Ай бұрын
RIP to all the poor souls lost that night. 🙏
@00Kuja00
@00Kuja00 Ай бұрын
Imagen being a fish swimming having a good time and suddenly this big thing comes crashing down through the darkness.^^*
@AmmyWulf
@AmmyWulf Ай бұрын
It's quite haunting to know that in hundreds of years, people will only ever recognize wreck by it's propellers and be left wondering how it was once attached to a giant Ocean Liner.
@ianloeb1672
@ianloeb1672 12 күн бұрын
Honestly they should save the propellers I feel they are worth salvaging
@Alfiegould7822
@Alfiegould7822 8 күн бұрын
@@ianloeb1672they most defiantly will be I can only assume their waiting for them to naturally detach from the ship because they would be incredibly difficult To remove
@AnimePrayer
@AnimePrayer Ай бұрын
For a school presentation my son chose the Titanc. As a model kit maker he pleased me to made the ship in different scale. I made one in 1:1200 in one piece, only the chimneys around at the bottom of the ocean. The kids told me that i am wrong, cause it broke in two. I said "Yes, but this was the way people thought she looked like until Sep. 1, 1985!
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A REAL TIME.
@keneniahwilliams4374
@keneniahwilliams4374 Ай бұрын
You should do a real time
@thomazadm
@thomazadm Ай бұрын
@@keneniahwilliams4374yeah
@levyan4718
@levyan4718 Ай бұрын
WAS THIS COMMENT NECESSARY
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@levyan4718 yes
@pimuce
@pimuce Ай бұрын
@@keneniahwilliams4374the descent was the famous film with grottes and monsters 👿
@maxloef3568
@maxloef3568 Ай бұрын
Man casually using the same OST as the documentary, what a boss
@Jackr85
@Jackr85 Ай бұрын
The ost sounds like temple music and I like ig
@indismart998
@indismart998 18 күн бұрын
​@@Jackr85 it's the ost of inception
@crearnie7491
@crearnie7491 Ай бұрын
I wouldn’t necessarily say ‘like a stone’ she went down (her bow at least) very elegantly like you very beautifully portrayed.
@timonsolus
@timonsolus 26 күн бұрын
Yes, the bow didn’t fall vertically straight downward, but glided slightly forward as well as down. The stern did fall straight down, but whirled around like a sycamore seed as it did so.
@D0ng1
@D0ng1 7 күн бұрын
I think it was more the idea she “sank like a stone” because she was a heavy bitch and did just drop, nothing to slow nor stop her descent til she reached the ocean floor.
@eXtremeFX2010
@eXtremeFX2010 6 күн бұрын
Only clothes and shoes at that depth. Human flesh would be crushed into oblivion on the way down.... RIP 🙏 Ocean Gate incident taught us that.
@antuanderothschild
@antuanderothschild Ай бұрын
I, personally, have always thought about this part of the event. So it's cool that someone is focusing on it. Good job. 😉
@timothymaher5328
@timothymaher5328 Ай бұрын
Honestly, this soundtrack is perfect. Usually it's something tragic, or there's no music and it's just groaning and crashing metal echoing through the deep. This is kind of upbeat, and it staves off the thalassophobia.
@angelynduman-ag6444
@angelynduman-ag6444 Ай бұрын
here before it goes viral
@RakibKhan-yk6ki
@RakibKhan-yk6ki Ай бұрын
I love you
@humpadumpathump5918
@humpadumpathump5918 6 күн бұрын
Imagine being a sea creature with a home on the sea floor when this bad boy comes hurtling above to change your life forever
@alexbisnauth1036
@alexbisnauth1036 Ай бұрын
God bless to the people that suffered RIP
@serchdietrich
@serchdietrich Ай бұрын
With all the Titanic mania always present, I'm surprised that nobody has done this in real time.
@there56
@there56 Ай бұрын
I love the titanic it was the best and you made the sinking of titanic thx it a cool video.
@turgid_member8717
@turgid_member8717 17 күн бұрын
The stern was not "full of air" and certainly didn't "implode," air getting forced out and replaced with water is what caused it to sink, it's not like the stern was air tight. True there were no doubt pockets of air that could have caused mini implosion, but nothing to cause the severe damage of the stern section. Hydrodynamic forces wrenched apart the stern as it cascaded to the bottom. It wasn't arrow-shaped like the bow, it didn't cut through the water on the way down.
@adrianghandtchi1562
@adrianghandtchi1562 10 күн бұрын
I understand that as much as well, a great example of air being rushed out of a ship even through open port holes near the surface was the sinking of the Oceanos.
@Garsons-oq4lh
@Garsons-oq4lh Ай бұрын
In 2001 Cameron discovered in the wreck way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) an upright wash stand (that faced foward towards the bow) with a carafe and glass still in place on shelves. So if the bow took such a steep angle 0:12 going to the bottom, how then did these objects not tumble off their shelves? The shelves had guard rails to keep the objects in place however they were of insufficient height particularly for the higher up carafe.
@joshmesser1898
@joshmesser1898 Ай бұрын
Not a scientist, but possibly since the bow filled slowly and was full of water at the time of the sinking, the water pressure kept everything stable on the way down.
@Woody615
@Woody615 Ай бұрын
@@joshmesser1898 Yes, but I think @Garsons-oq4lh is referring to the impact. Based on most models, the impact would have jarred everything loose and knocked everything over. I don't know the answer, just trying to hopefully clarify. If I got it wrong, I apologize.
@Garsons-oq4lh
@Garsons-oq4lh Ай бұрын
​​​​​@@joshmesser1898The bow is at such a steep angle here 0:12 that there is no way those objects would've stayed in place.
@subadanus6310
@subadanus6310 Ай бұрын
so generally seagoing ships have things to prevent stuff from tumbling around in rough waters. the particular glass you're talking about used to have a wooden trim around to to hold it in place, but it has rotted away between then and when it was discovered. the same trim is visible on pictures of olympic's fixtures.
@Garsons-oq4lh
@Garsons-oq4lh Ай бұрын
​​​@@subadanus6310Yes there were trims but there was also a carafe on the higher shelf (the glass below it). They were both perfectly in place so no way the bow took the angle it did at 0:12 .
@TLO129
@TLO129 Ай бұрын
Titanic's bow certainly didn't swing down. There's no force acting on it that would cause it to do so, and its center of gravity is aft of its midpoint. All physical model tests show the bow flutters down like a lead in the wind. The boilers are still in their seats and most furnishings inside are still upright. It's clear the bow fell at a shallow angle and fluttered down. It didn't do the James Cameron dive bomb maneuver.
@brettcannon74
@brettcannon74 Ай бұрын
I truly hope in my lifetime they have the technology to raise one of the props, or dig out the center 3 bladed one
@davidhaxell4161
@davidhaxell4161 4 күн бұрын
The stern didn't implode, it wasn't airtight.
@MizzShortai
@MizzShortai 5 күн бұрын
Apparently they heard titanic when it hit the bottom of the ocean.
@anunordinarycellist
@anunordinarycellist 7 күн бұрын
The fact this was on Roblox is crazy
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry 7 күн бұрын
@@anunordinarycellist this isn't Roblox this is blender
@The_Big_Blue_Bug_of_Justice
@The_Big_Blue_Bug_of_Justice Ай бұрын
Nice alternative to the usual videos of this kind 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@joeblogs-vx4ep
@joeblogs-vx4ep Ай бұрын
Excellent video 👍 Just one small point its DR Robert Ballard the emphasis on DR 👍 he's not a huge ego cowboy like james Cameron
@mrheadcrab1233
@mrheadcrab1233 7 сағат бұрын
And to think something so massive and huge, strong and fresh off the drydock, could be broken up and blown apart in such a way. It fails to register for me
@albertyabar9249
@albertyabar9249 Ай бұрын
Y pensar que aún había gente atrapada dentro del barco , sus cuerpos habrán implosionado.
@albertyabar9249
@albertyabar9249 Ай бұрын
@@sabrinashelton1997 Por supuesto que sí !! ..Los hombres que trabajaban en la sala de máquinas haciendo que el Titanic siga con las luces encendidas,las personas de 3 clase que se perdieron en los laberintos del barco!! Todos ellos se hundieron hasta el fondo .
@ricemmanuelledimaapi5980
@ricemmanuelledimaapi5980 Ай бұрын
Actualy at that time nobody would have been in the engine room they probably was outside helping with the lifeboats and the 3rd class wasnt locked up like in the movie they just took a long time to get up on deck since they dont open the gates unless its an emergency and they didnt think it was an emergency untill it was atleast 40+ mins after the collision
@albertyabar9249
@albertyabar9249 Ай бұрын
@@ricemmanuelledimaapi5980 Deberías leer un poco más de historia,el oficial Murdoch ordenó cerrar las compuertas al momento de la colisión para evitar que los compartimentos estancos se llenen de agua ,aún quedaban muchos trabajadores dentro de la sala de máquinas para despresurizar las calderas si no el Titanic podía explosionar debido al vapor acumulado,además los ingenieros eléctricos se quedaron en las entrañas del barco para que aún haya electricidad!!!
@gregorycastillo1456
@gregorycastillo1456 Ай бұрын
Excellent video!! . Congratulations!
@johnfoster7626
@johnfoster7626 Ай бұрын
The bronze propellers and the telemotor from the wheelhouse could potentially lasts hundreds of years if not longer. Only a few metals can withstand the corrosive forces of the sea. Bronze is 1, gold is another.
@kevinvicedomini8745
@kevinvicedomini8745 5 күн бұрын
It's heartbreaking
@Horizon344
@Horizon344 Ай бұрын
Excellent film, thx
@050572robert
@050572robert Ай бұрын
Bridge was already gone before the bow went under completely. It was smashed by the forward stack, and so was the leading edge of the bridge wing and it was bent out forward.
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@050572robert smashed by the mast snapping back. The forward funnel fell to the side not forward
@Craigy2818
@Craigy2818 4 күн бұрын
Makes me wonder if there were any air pockets left and people still alive, during the descent.
@sopa4472
@sopa4472 Ай бұрын
this is very good i ever seen A deck is pancaked true. in the stern section
@jenniferrucker2266
@jenniferrucker2266 Ай бұрын
I wonder how she would’ve looked if she were found in 1955 rather than 1985 ?
@timonsolus
@timonsolus 26 күн бұрын
Closer to how she looked in 1985 than to how she would have looked in 1915. Less rusticles than in 1985, but not no rusticles.
@PRR5406
@PRR5406 Ай бұрын
I thought this very realistic and well done. Nice job!😊
@StuyJamaicaYonkers
@StuyJamaicaYonkers Ай бұрын
It was and the music fit too, watchin it go down with the music like damn, 5⭐️
@JACCO20082012
@JACCO20082012 Ай бұрын
Thank you for not including that asinine down draft of water.
@video198712
@video198712 Ай бұрын
when I read that the Titanic split in half when she went under and that people didn't believe it until it waas found, I thought to myself, no way could any huge ship like that could NOT split in 2 (or more)would be impossible for it not to have split into two on the way down. Question did any other ship that sank, go down in one piece?
@maximiliane.norden8607
@maximiliane.norden8607 Ай бұрын
Yeah the Britannic for example, the sister ship, went down in one piece in 1916.
@emeraldosiris5112
@emeraldosiris5112 20 сағат бұрын
I never knew the wreck sank to music.
@Dark_Matter2
@Dark_Matter2 Ай бұрын
More accurate than James Cameron version, great job
@jamesfracasse8178
@jamesfracasse8178 Ай бұрын
More accurate than your name,stop hating on Cameron version 1:37
@j88productions
@j88productions Ай бұрын
@@jamesfracasse8178yo shut up, bro was making a complement
@a-guy1912
@a-guy1912 Ай бұрын
James, it literally is.
@Dark_Matter2
@Dark_Matter2 Ай бұрын
@@jamesfracasse8178 I love James Cameron but truth is truth, now we know more information about brakeup and decent to the bottom
@ChrissonatorOFL
@ChrissonatorOFL Ай бұрын
I don't think the stern stood straight up in the air like this one still shows.
@a-guy1912
@a-guy1912 Ай бұрын
A fun fact that is stated in the video: this is half time
@ChairmanPaulieD
@ChairmanPaulieD Ай бұрын
"Pretty Cool Huh" 😆😅😂🤣
@jsldj
@jsldj Ай бұрын
Rainer Dry!
@smokejaguar986
@smokejaguar986 7 күн бұрын
Is it possible for anyone to have survived in a pocket of air as the ship sank to the bottom? I think it wouldn't be possible.
@GemmaLB
@GemmaLB 4 күн бұрын
No because the bow was fully flooded and any air pockets would have been pushed out of the stern as it sank. The stern wasn't a pressure vessel it had plenty of holes for air to escape from portholes to massive ventilation systems. Check out Oceanliner Designs' video "What Happened To TItanic's Stern" if you want to know more.
@TheNutter44
@TheNutter44 Ай бұрын
a bit of info: the bow went down smoothly no implosions but the stern imploded 2-3 time before coming to rest on the bottom ( but I could be mistaken on that because I don't know much about when happened on that day cause I was born 72 years later so I might be wrong?)
@adrianghandtchi1562
@adrianghandtchi1562 10 күн бұрын
Are you sure it was an implosion? And not the hydrodynamic forces that stripped the gaping section away. I figured all of the air was already pushed out at the surface. especially since there are massive areas in the ship where the division of spaces was wood not metal
@101Osprey101
@101Osprey101 21 күн бұрын
In the real world, pressure differential is the driving force behind an implosion. The stern implosion theory ignores real world facts. The stern could never have imploded as the pressure would have had escape routes and then what air was left would have eventually equalized or the air would have "fizzled" out through the water like in a carbonated drink. The mass damage was caused by hydrodynamic forces as it fell and then, after being weakened by losing so much of the internal and external structure in it's fall, it collapsed further when it struck the bottom.
@sp1n4l_sn4p
@sp1n4l_sn4p Ай бұрын
i hope those propellers, once the ship has eroded, will be recovered, it’d be a shame to let them rot and eventually, probably, be lost to time as the ship fully disappears.
@mrviking2mcall212
@mrviking2mcall212 Ай бұрын
Yeah, but there’s plenty of people who want nothing more to be taken from the wreck since it’s considered a gravesite, and it’s not like we don’t already have the whistle, the bell, the Big Piece, and other symbolic relics recovered already.
@sp1n4l_sn4p
@sp1n4l_sn4p Ай бұрын
@@mrviking2mcall212 Titanic isn’t really a gravesite, most of those people died in the water afterwsrds and sank down over time, not to mention that basically evrrything and everywhere is a gravesite, someone has died probably everywhere at this point. And wouldn’t it be nice to save one of the most iconic things from the ship that would probably be in the best condition to raise without damaging it?
@mrviking2mcall212
@mrviking2mcall212 Ай бұрын
@@sp1n4l_sn4p I never said *I* agreed with the gravesite sentiment.
@sp1n4l_sn4p
@sp1n4l_sn4p Ай бұрын
@@mrviking2mcall212 im giving my argument against it since that is the reason why people dont want things removed, as you said in your statement.
@RaccoonKCD
@RaccoonKCD Ай бұрын
I reckon they would be the last thing ever recovered since removing them anytime soon will completely destroy what's left of the stern section. Waiting until the stern finally folds in on itself or just disintegrates is the right thing to do
@Dillvn
@Dillvn Ай бұрын
2:37 Yeah boom, it kind of breaks its back
@ffferoz
@ffferoz Ай бұрын
Wow! Nice animation for making how Titanic wen’t underwater.
@IloveCruiseShips1912
@IloveCruiseShips1912 Ай бұрын
Hi TornadoHarry, I have a question - What are your thoughts on new (But ongoing) research which suggests Boat 10 left at 2:08 - 2:09 - later than previously thought? I agree with it as it explains Frank Evans and Edward Buley’s accounts. Great video aswell btw, keep up the great work :)
@1237Noah
@1237Noah Ай бұрын
I've been wanting someone to do an animation on this
@thomazadm
@thomazadm Ай бұрын
So cool.
@rogerhuffmanjr.7695
@rogerhuffmanjr.7695 17 күн бұрын
don't think that the stern would have collapsed apart like that the moment she impacted the sea floor. I think the fact that she was full of air, and with the implosion, most of her damage to the stern occurred during that time including the peel back of the poop deck. Also the two towers may have imploded apart at that time as well. I do know that there is some vague survivor testimonies that seems to indicate that the towers did come apart at the surface but I would imagine most of it would have managed to stay together until the implosion. I would also imagine that the implosion happened much further down, (and I'm just estimating here but I would have to say about a mile or so). Also, I know that they are saying the mast may have whipped around and destroyed the bridge but I just don't think that looks correct. The bridge may have taken damage when the masked collapsed but I would like to see what evidence they have to support that the mast whipped around like that. I see no reason why the superstructure of the bridge couldn't have come apart naturally as it descended.
@frankydman
@frankydman Ай бұрын
Although bodies would not be found at the wreck sites- crustaceans ate the remains right down to the bones… scattered among the debris field, pairs of shoes would be found… the way they landed in the seafloor suggesting they were the last resting place of a victim of the sinking
@ChairmanPaulieD
@ChairmanPaulieD Ай бұрын
the ones who weren't wearing lifebelts like Jack Dawson wasn't wearing one but was hanging on the wooden archway (NOT a cabin door 🚫) and then Rose let go of his hands and he descended to the abyss of the Atlantic 🥺
@ACtheLegend
@ACtheLegend Ай бұрын
​@@ChairmanPaulieD Jack and Rose are fictional
@KyleM9862
@KyleM9862 8 күн бұрын
imagine the grip
@peteranserin3708
@peteranserin3708 10 күн бұрын
Ok kids, how fast was ship travelling under water?
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry 10 күн бұрын
@@peteranserin3708 6.4 meters a second
@francovolpe148
@francovolpe148 Ай бұрын
I'm here before it goes viral
@josevillarroel7630
@josevillarroel7630 28 күн бұрын
Faster than me when I have to shower
@jacobmartin9774
@jacobmartin9774 Ай бұрын
Wonder what would happen if Titanic's engines were able to be salvaged and fell into the hands of WhistlinDiesel!
@RetroPC
@RetroPC Ай бұрын
Do you think if everyone was completely silent at the surface when the bow hit, they could have heard it?
@thestonedabbot9551
@thestonedabbot9551 Ай бұрын
Nah, water was way too deep to hear anything
@StuyJamaicaYonkers
@StuyJamaicaYonkers Ай бұрын
@@thestonedabbot9551way too deep
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
No, but people did hear the stern imploding
@StuyJamaicaYonkers
@StuyJamaicaYonkers 22 күн бұрын
@@TornadoHarry I believe that
@marcelgeiger1459
@marcelgeiger1459 Ай бұрын
Great work !
@neverinthemoment
@neverinthemoment Ай бұрын
VERY NICELY DONE!!!
@Marios-zx7zg
@Marios-zx7zg Ай бұрын
wow good job
@markbragg4656
@markbragg4656 Ай бұрын
After careful examining of both bow and stern sections I find this historically inaccurate and I have been examining it since it was found.
@lpdog82
@lpdog82 Ай бұрын
pretty close rendering , the stern was actually spiraling a bit faster , when it hit the sea floor it left a long skid mark off to one side, detailed imagery has shown this , , , that aside i love this video and the greenish blue sea water , very eerie indeed
@johnnydao8056
@johnnydao8056 Ай бұрын
This is awesome can I use this video or this scene I'll credit you at the end
@grantmctaggart9942
@grantmctaggart9942 Ай бұрын
I know I’m wrong in a lot of people’s books but I say raise or raise as much her as possible before the props are the only thing left. Hopefully we have the tech to do it some day soon
@SudrianTales
@SudrianTales Ай бұрын
Why?
@grantmctaggart9942
@grantmctaggart9942 Ай бұрын
@@SudrianTales she won’t be there forever in been over 100 years an all the misinformation has already gotten to stupid heights and will only get worse. Another 100 years shel be gone and that stupid “the titanic is actually the Olympic” theory might become fact. I’m also not of the opinion that the ship is a grave yard. The debris field maybe…MAYBE could be one but the bodies are long gone and people died on the surface of the water anyway. Also since when did been a grave stop archaeologist in Egypt anyway? It is what it is. If she was in better shape and no where near as deep I’d say leave her but in order to find out everything and remember the victims raising or pulling as much up as possible is the only way to go. I used to be firmly on team “leave her there” but I don’t think people appreciate the fact that she is now truly dying.
@keetahbrough
@keetahbrough Ай бұрын
it's a fkn gravessite, stop. ya don't dig up gravesites.
@grantmctaggart9942
@grantmctaggart9942 Ай бұрын
@@keetahbrough no it isn’t. Wheres the bodies? Where do most people die? The surface might be a grave site but that’s it. If you have a cry about titanic you should also have a cry about the pyramids
@Sh2roblox
@Sh2roblox Ай бұрын
Cool
@Laurentus89
@Laurentus89 Ай бұрын
The stern did NOT implode, it's physically impossible as it is no sealed/watertight vessel at that moment!
@McLarenMercedes
@McLarenMercedes Ай бұрын
The cargo hold in the stern WAS a sealed compartment. What happens when outside pressure wants to occupy an area with lower pressure... Implosion.
@Laurentus89
@Laurentus89 Ай бұрын
@@McLarenMercedes Every single compartment and room in the whole ship was vented and had several openings for piping and wires, the cargo holds could not be considered sealed in the slightest. What comes closest to the definition would be the refrigeration area, but even that space was built to be airtight, not watertight. Several structrues would have collapsed even at the slightest rising pressure, there is just no possibility for a big enough pressure differential. The only structure physically able to implode (at least if partially or totally empty) would be the freshwater tanks, but even if they did they couldn't rip apart the stern.
@allannakhle8555
@allannakhle8555 Ай бұрын
Pretty cool huh?
@ChairmanPaulieD
@ChairmanPaulieD Ай бұрын
"Thank you for that fine forensic analysis Mr. Bodine" 😆😅😂🤣
@syphon_9892
@syphon_9892 Ай бұрын
Can you please make a video on the deepest wreck to date USS Samuel B. Roberts, which sank at a depth of 22,621 ft (6894m)
@silentgamer2434
@silentgamer2434 Ай бұрын
It's a bit weird, but I loose all interest for the Titanic as soon as she sinks below the surface. To me, looking at her wreck is so sad and depressing. It's a bit cringe to phrase it like that but I don't want to remember the Titanic as a pile of iron rotting at the bottom of the atlantic.
@RaccoonKCD
@RaccoonKCD Ай бұрын
2:37 Animations always show cargo hatch 1 hitting the crane on the prow of the ship causing it to face forward but is there actual proof that happened? surely it makes more sense that the force of hitting the floor spun it around. Genuinly asking if anyone knows lol
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
​@@RaccoonKCD the hatch doesnt hit the crane in this animation, it's just the perspective. The force of the water moving down and forward would have snapped the crane
@Nikolai_The_Crazed
@Nikolai_The_Crazed Ай бұрын
4:33 One thing missing. The break up wasn’t exactly clean, and it had some major consequences as a result. One of them being, the two engines lost their first cylinders as the ship broke up. The break up started when double bottom was heaved upward, bending and tearing the massive bed plates for the engines on the process. When the bow and stern separated, the first cylinders of the twin, four cylinder engines were ripped out. There are only three cylinders on each engine still attached at the wreck site of the stern. The other two cylinders, and their supports, are scattered nearby. And the break up didn’t exactly occur between the second and third funnel, it actually seemed to be a bit more complicated than that. The break seemed to have originated for the double bottom, like I said before. That section of double bottom is well documented, and it was located at the front of the engines, just behind the third funnel. But we know the superstructure, for both the bow and stern, separated between funnel 2 and 3, because the forward and aft towers slid off after the bow separated. How is that possible if the break up happened to the rear of that? Well, the break up seems to have been less than uniform. From one theory, It seemed to form a jagged J-shape. It started behind the third funnel from the keel. The double bottom, being under extreme compression, buckled and forced its way up in what would become the two double bottom pieces we know today. From there, the split curved forward, sloping more vertically at about midship, ending at the superstructure just barely in front of funnel 3. The bow plunged, the double keel gave, and the bow detached. The forward tower section of the stern superstructure slid off shortly after, with the forward tower taking the uptakes for the third funnel and several boilers. The superstructure pieces were lighter than the bow, so they would’ve tumbled and floated more in the current. At the same time, several boilers would fall out with the forward tower. The boilers would drop like stones, landing slightly scattered below the site of the break up, and close to where the stern would land. The boilers likely ripped away from the lighter forward tower section and funnel uptakes, while the aft tower and galley sections remained attached to the hull of the stern for a little longer. the forward two cylinders of the engines, who were dangling by a thread at this point, would go with the after tower moments later, leaving the aft galley still attached to the mangled hull of the stern. The forward tower would tumble around, landing to the north east of the stern section, about 1,500ft away, roughly. The double bottom pieces would land a few hundred feet closer to the stern than the forward tower. Blown off the stern in the fall to the sea floor. The aft tower would land next to the remains of one of the forward cylinders, just at the nose of the stern which now pointed toward the bow to the north. The galley deck remains would’ve torn off from the stern on the descent, like many other pieces of the stern, and landed just beside the stern to the east. The second lost cylinder would land just to the east of that, in the field of boilers and hull debris. And we all know what happened to the bow, it landed to the north, pointed toward the north east. This odd break pattern is why some people speculate the break may have taken a y-pattern, forking at some point in the hull and terminating at the superstructure both in front and behind the third funnel. This pattern would be very unusual, but could also help explain the details of the break up. Either way, the events once separation began are pretty much the same with the forward tower following after the bow.
@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413
@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413 Ай бұрын
Its actually speculated now that forward tower was attached to the stern still. Forward tower is square shaped piece, it lacks any hydrodynamic shape just like boilers and would drop straight down. So due to that its speculated that when stern went down, during its first spin it trew forward tower to east, following a bit later double bottom pieces.
@Nikolai_The_Crazed
@Nikolai_The_Crazed Ай бұрын
@@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413 The tower sections are very heavy, heavier than the boilers. But the towers have more surface area, and are mostly made from wood and light sheet metal. It’s also less like a square, and more like a sponge. It’s full of holes for cabin and lounge spaces, and that adds to the surface area. They would catch like a sail in the wind in the ocean currents. The boilers are more dense, and have less surface area. While not exactly hydrodynamic, they have less surface detail for currents to get a purchase on, so they drop straight down. The area right above where the boilers landed would be the breakup zone. There’s several different testimonies on what happened, but if you pick through the information, you find some interesting details. For one, one man reported that he saw the ship break, and he saw the ‘engines’ slide forward into the spot the forward half should’ve been. This is likely the first two cylinders falling off. If the forward tower was still there, that couldn’t have been the case. The engine cylinders would have a recognizable shape from the rest of the ships structure, being simpler in shape, they’d be hard to miss or mistake for something else. And given the distance from the debris field, it’s likely the forward tower fell off closer to the surface, where it then tumbled to its current location. It’s likely the initial break up partially separated the forward tower from the hull, and it tumbled after the bow when the stern heeled back level. It was also likely tossed by the wake of the bow cutting through the water. If the tower and the double bottom went/were tossed when the stern started spiraling, there would be more lightweight debris scattered with them, but there’s fairly little. The double bottom pieces probably went at the same time as to boilers and engines, because them being connected causes other problems for what we see on the debris field. The engine components landed around where the boilers had. These had to have fallen into the sea and about the same time, or else they’d be scattered outward. The problem is, the double bottom is in the way. If the bottom remained attached, the engines would not fall out in time, and would likely have been forced back into the engine bay by hydrodynamic forces. Then they wouldn’t fall off until the ship started spiraling, which would have scattered them further out. For them to drop where they did, the double bottom had to have fallen off not long after the forward tower. Otherwise the engine parts would’ve been partially trapped by the double bottom. Meaning the bottom detached not long after the bow and forward tower plunged beneath the waves. It’s possible that the _aft tower_ remained attached until the stern started spiraling, but it would be unlikely the forward tower would stay attached, as the spiral would’ve scattered the debris field even further. There is little other debris out that way, which wouldn’t be the case if they were taken off when the stern started the corkscrew. It’s likely everything that was going to come off the stern, came off either before the corkscrew started, or late into the corkscrew, otherwise we’d see more lightweight debris scattered over the sight of the forward tower and double bottom area. Since most of the debris is scattered over the sight of the boilers, and the bottom/forward tower sections are isolated from them, they must’ve gone separate from the stern. It also means the spiral didn’t swing wide enough to toss those pieces of double bottom, or the tower, out that far. They would’ve landed with everything else if they had separated that late, so again, they had to have fallen off earlier.
@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413
@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413 Ай бұрын
@@Nikolai_The_Crazed i dont think engine cylinder would have been actually visible, they are the bottom of the ship and only small part of them was above waterline. When ship broke up it would immediately flood that room and it would be dragged down slightly, preventing them being visible. Also about the forward tower, the currents that were going to southwest so if currents influenced forward tower it would end up being in completely opposite direction. So it somehow went against the currents. It also was speculated that forward tower was the first 1 piece came off during spiral and closer to surface, then double bottoms and everything else came later during descent a bit closer to bottom.
@Nikolai_The_Crazed
@Nikolai_The_Crazed Ай бұрын
@@xxdeckxxdumanyan7413 It is important to note that the bit about water current is partially true. The deep western boundary current flows from the north, to the south east. But it flows _under_ the Gulf Stream current at the point where titanic sank, and the gulf stream flows northeast. That’s because colder water is more dense, and sinks beneath the(relatively) warmer surface waters. The western boundary current collides with the Gulf Stream up north and sinks beneath it, because it’s carrying frigid waters from the polar region. For the first part of Titanic’s fall, the debris would be at the mercy of the Gulf Stream, and as it drops down to the abyssal plain, it enters the Deep western boundary. Lighter pieces of debris, like coal and various other belongings, get swept to the south after initially being carried to the north. The larger pieces would change directions as well, but the extent of that depends on the mass of the object and how far it is from the bottom when it hits the lower current. If it’s too close and too heavy, it may only drift a short ways back before settling. There’s also the wake of the bow, and eventually the stern, stirring the water column. If it went with the bow, that wake could carry it to the north, with the Gulf Stream pushing it east. Eventually it hits the deep western boundary, arresting it a bit, but if there’s not enough water left beneath it, it’s still gonna land a decent way out.
@naray1006
@naray1006 20 күн бұрын
Poop deck for dogs like the movie😂 2:00
@graememcfee23
@graememcfee23 Ай бұрын
oh well ships eh!😂
@Left_divideshorts
@Left_divideshorts Ай бұрын
Why did i think it was roblox
@dougc3512
@dougc3512 Ай бұрын
sorry man, but the lighting was so bad I could barely see anything...
@PeterGeorgeThompson
@PeterGeorgeThompson Ай бұрын
You managed to reconstruct how the real Titanic sank
@CharlyLucky0397
@CharlyLucky0397 Ай бұрын
Realmente cuanto duro en llegar hasta el fondo??
@LeicaFleury
@LeicaFleury Ай бұрын
La proa que se hundió primero y gracias a sus propiedades hidrodinámicas tardó aproximadamente diez minutos enteros en golpear el fondo. La popa, sin ser hidrodinámica y cayendo en una espiral caótica en lugar de en línea recta cortando el agua demoró unos 37 minutos.
@insaciablemente
@insaciablemente 25 күн бұрын
¿De dónde vienen los 37 minutos tan exactos?​@@LeicaFleury
@jdtankvideos2584
@jdtankvideos2584 Ай бұрын
Can you do a full video about Titanic hidden The iceberg in the slow motion Sinking ..
@officespace7777
@officespace7777 Ай бұрын
I question these sinking models. I don't think it immediately snapped and then came apart. I think it broke and then it separated a little further down. With the bow pulling the stern. And then it separated.
@Garsons-oq4lh
@Garsons-oq4lh 21 күн бұрын
I believe survivor Jack Thayer described the bow as it went under rising. So as the bow plunged, it rose, and then that's when it broke from the stern and fell to the ocean bottom. This angle (0:12) never happened.
@mitchsnyder77
@mitchsnyder77 18 күн бұрын
Now just imagine being some poor whale or fish or whatever minding your own business, swimming along, and out of nowhere a busted ass ship comes down on your head knocking your ass out.
@Slowgroovin
@Slowgroovin Ай бұрын
Nice animation. The music is just too upbeat for such a tragic event, though.
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@Slowgroovin it's from.the final word documentary
@angusmann1667
@angusmann1667 Ай бұрын
I cannot believe the stern “sank like a stone because of the engines”! From numerous eye witness accounts the engines by this time were accumulated on the bow.
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@angusmann1667 it states the bow sank like a stone, not the stern
@Crashingfoot8
@Crashingfoot8 Ай бұрын
This music wants to be Mombasa from the Inception soundtrack so badly
@--Voltz--
@--Voltz-- Ай бұрын
*Awful choice of music. I muted it why I watched a minute of this. It sounded better LOL*
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@--Voltz-- thank you for your comment!
@sidharthaajithprasad1229
@sidharthaajithprasad1229 Ай бұрын
Titanic actually broke between third and fourth funnel. The stern imploded and spiraled out of control
@NearObsolete
@NearObsolete Ай бұрын
Thats the james cameron estimate. what is left of the bow is too short to have split that far back even with how much of it ripped off on the descent. The true break is right around the base of the third funnel
@IloveCruiseShips1912
@IloveCruiseShips1912 Ай бұрын
Most likely, it broke in between second and third funnels and third and fourth funnels - 3 section break
@TheHelper-l9m
@TheHelper-l9m Ай бұрын
The Lusitania is a way important ship.
@mrandrossguy9871
@mrandrossguy9871 Ай бұрын
👎👎👎 for Music Bgm But also not showing a dramatic dust plume as they hit the ocean floor
@TornadoHarry
@TornadoHarry Ай бұрын
@@mrandrossguy9871 take a gander at the ship when it hits the bottom, you'll be surprised
@mrandrossguy9871
@mrandrossguy9871 Ай бұрын
@@TornadoHarry yeah, wasn’t as dramatic as I expected but I get your drift XD
@xx03xx67
@xx03xx67 Ай бұрын
13th comment i will be back to see if this is famous
@xx03xx67
@xx03xx67 Ай бұрын
wat
@JonathanB824
@JonathanB824 Ай бұрын
accurate except for the third floating chunk of structure. no proof that occured. as far as we know it came apart in two pieces
@IloveCruiseShips1912
@IloveCruiseShips1912 Ай бұрын
Survivors testified a 3 section break, the wreck also supports this as the middle section is in several pieces, for example, forward and aft towers and the galley decks. Others also testified different break locations. Here are the accounts of a 3 section break - 1. William Lindsay: “I was on the ship ‘til the water came up to the funnel and we got away on a raft. There were 39 of us on it. Oh, but the sight was awful. I shall never forget it, for she broke in three pieces.” 2. James McGann: “She broke into three parts. The fore part went down first, then the middle of the ship, and I heard a hissing as it dropped into the sea.” 3. William Murdock: “When we got 100 yards away, she suddenly righted, the lights went out, and the stern rose clear of the water. She remained that way for two or three minutes, and then sank bow-first. There was no plunge, she just glided beneath the surface.” “After the collision, the Titanic broke into three parts.” 4. Carrie Chaffee: “The ship sank steadily until just at the last, when it plunged rapidly. Just before going down, it seemed to writhe, breaking into the three parts into which it was divided. First, the middle seemed to go down, lifting bow and stern into the air. Then it twisted the other way, throwing the middle up. Finally, the bow went under, and it plunged, stern last.” 5. Harry Oliver: “Recognizing that the Titanic was fast settling down, the crew pulled vigorously to get beyond the region of a possible vortex. Suddenly, there was a terrible crash, and the great ship appeared to split in ‘twain, if not in three distinct sections, the rending of her timbers and steel plates making a noise that carried terror into the hearts of all.” “He is confident that the Titanic broke between the third and fourth funnels, and also believes that her machinery fell out of her, causing her to sink like a log.” 6. Thomas Threlfall: “When the boilers broke out of the ship, it was dreadful. Mr. Lowe, the fifth officer, was in command of my boat, and I heard him say: ‘Thank God! Perhaps she will float now with all that weight out of her.’ Then she broke again, and we knew she must go down.” 7. Thomas Threlfall: “Shortly after I got out by the emergency ladder, she parted forward of the bridge. Then she parted again, and the boilers dropped out of her. As she parted, a pal of mine dropped between the sections. A funnel fell over onto lots of people in the water; it must have killed a tidy few. I was picked up.”
@gokulgopan4397
@gokulgopan4397 Ай бұрын
That whole section below funnel 3 is missing in the wreck. Debris of that section was found in 2012 (I believe) along with the double bottom piece. That's how they theorized the 3 section break.
@ACtheLegend
@ACtheLegend Ай бұрын
"Accurate except for" gonna stop you at that, since you weren't there and couldn't possibly know more than anyone else about it.
@JC-39428
@JC-39428 14 күн бұрын
What a waste. All of it for nothing.
@Alfiegould7822
@Alfiegould7822 8 күн бұрын
Why bother watching it then
@LawrenceLaffer
@LawrenceLaffer Ай бұрын
Poop deck. 😂
@JakeBruening
@JakeBruening 15 күн бұрын
mmmmmm yhid video kidna smells wierd
@theslicefactor4590
@theslicefactor4590 Ай бұрын
Odd music choice.
The Amazing Titanic Wreck 3D Scans: A Guide
26:36
Oceanliner Designs
Рет қаралды 418 М.
Titanic survivor recalls harrowing moment ship sank | BBC Global
7:23
Please Help This Poor Boy 🙏
00:40
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
OceanGate Titan Sub Debris Video Shows How It Imploded
11:29
jeffostroff
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
What Will Happen to Titanic's Wreck?
24:36
Oceanliner Designs
Рет қаралды 182 М.
Sinking of bloxia
4:12
Captain Hunt
Рет қаралды 521
Titan Sub: OceanGate Employees Show What REALLY Happened
31:37
jeffostroff
Рет қаралды 109 М.
Final Plunge: Titanic's HORRIFYING Last 5 Minutes
26:35
Oceanliner Designs
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
How the Titanic Was Found
22:19
neo
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
James Cameron, TITANIC Animation
7:15
CaptainSmith23 S.
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Lusitania Sinks in REAL TIME | 18 Minutes of Terror (SCORED)
25:11
All Titanic Breakup Theories (V2)
9:18
Wolfric Rogers
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
The First Dives To Titanic (1986)
24:06
Titaniac
Рет қаралды 238 М.
Решили избавиться от старой собаки 😢
1:00
Prime Principles
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Be wise and well-behaved!! #jesus #jesuschrist #jesuslovesyou
0:19
Jesus By Your Side
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
ПИ ДИДДИ - ГЛАВНЫЙ МОНСТР ИНДУСТРИИ
40:12
Решили избавиться от старой собаки 😢
1:00
Prime Principles
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН