if I was asked to describe physics in one sentence I'd say 'Everything is a harmonic oscillator if you're brave enough and everything converges if you wait long enough'.
@Leomenxd2 жыл бұрын
A man of culture, i see
@boonedockjourneyman79792 жыл бұрын
How about this “find a guy named Feynman.” Too easy I guess. I’m absolutely sure you’d do better. Feynman was such a bore. The problem was he made you laugh so hard it was impossible to forget his reasoning. But I’m absolutely sure you’d do better.
@ChristAliveForevermore2 жыл бұрын
@@boonedockjourneyman7979 all of Feynman's contemporaries, like Freeeman Dyson, Leonard Susskind, and Murray Gell-Man, all claimed Feynman was a creative genius and computational savant. His sense of humor and social skills were what contrasted his freaky mathematical ingenuity and physical intuition. The *early* 20th century physics legends, figures like Bohr, said Feynman was like Paul Dirac, but human (since Dirac was basically Rain Man in the 20th century physics community). Don't downplay Feynman's role in physics or his extreme cleverness just because he either intimidates you or appears too foolish to be a genius. Genius comes in many guises, not all of them appealing.
@Democratic_Republic_of_Iacon Жыл бұрын
“He died of -heart- harmonic oscillation failure.”
@burpleson2 жыл бұрын
Very nicely done. Although I received my physics PhD 34 years ago, I enjoy watching your clear explanations. I'm sure many students are benefiting from your efforts. Thanks.
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@ycombinator7652 жыл бұрын
wait what? wow, 34 years ago.....may i ask what your age is sir?
@123886962 жыл бұрын
@@ycombinator765 35
@fuji_films2 жыл бұрын
@@ycombinator765 No, you may not. 👳
@chromax16192 жыл бұрын
@@ycombinator765 31
@johnchessant30122 жыл бұрын
I remember I was so proud for figuring out the "Taylor expand around the minimum and compare with a simple harmonic oscillator" trick by myself. There was an exercise in Kleppner/Kolenkow about some atomic potential which had 6th powers and 12th powers and I was at a loss for awhile before coming up with it. Great video!
@amarnathck5742 жыл бұрын
Dude, that's our course material. I'll sure keep an eye out for the problem you mentioned
@manswind34172 жыл бұрын
I guess you're referring to the question where U(x) is modeled as a/x^6 - b/x^12 right? And we probably had to fibd the equilibrium point which is easy, and some other question also followed.
@s3cr3tpassword2 жыл бұрын
Lennard-Jones potential! Used in solid state physics everywhere
@zombyMT2 жыл бұрын
Dude I just did that like 3 weeks ago, it's the Lennard-Jones potential!
@varmygirl1183 Жыл бұрын
okay this math is our assignment now. and I am facing problem 😢
@barneycasting83312 жыл бұрын
I just got my tenure as professor in a US college, I am a researcher but have to teaching students. I need to admit that I am not a good Physics teacher. Your videos saved me from getting fired from the job, thanks a million!
@rNT-lf2hf3 ай бұрын
Wow!!! How Honestly criticized to Self.. I am not good of.. Physics.. 🙏🙏
@arknightz50462 жыл бұрын
Great video you made here, I study physics as an undergraduate and I failed this part last year so… I’m glad I found your channel ! pure treasure
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Very glad you liked it!
@Inndjkaawed29222 жыл бұрын
Dude, you hit the nail on the head with this video. During my entire time in college, I was only able to midly link everything that I studied with one dimensional harmonic oscillator. Now, I realised why I was unable to do well in college. I'm trying to get back into Physics to pursue a PhD. Let's see how far I get with a renewed approach
@chandu80812 жыл бұрын
One dimensional physics kuda telsa ah ra niku???😃😆
@Inndjkaawed29222 жыл бұрын
@@chandu8081 what? Mind rephrasing your comment in English?
@gigachad19272 жыл бұрын
@@Inndjkaawed2922 he's trolling you in telugu , he says "do you even know one dimensional physics?"
@ShanBojack Жыл бұрын
@@chandu8081 👏💀
@rodbarker10172 жыл бұрын
My Father was a charterd civil engineer and a deffinate wiz with reinforced concrete. e was always banging on about SHM and how it got into everything arround us....Back in the day I was not a little behind the curve, having quite marked ADHD & OCD. in the 50"s I was just put down as Thick.... Well a lot of water under the bridge and NO not as dosey as they all thaught. How I wish I had the knowledge and understanding I now have to recognise the brilliance of Pop. We could hace rocked. I cant thank you enough you have helped me realise I may not be a dope and have something to offer. and hoe brilliant he was. However I can now get behind my two grandkids who are confirmes exceptional and in special schooling. I now know where it comes from. Just thanks a million
@kennethmui882 жыл бұрын
Fantastic Video! Great Animations/Simulations, Super clear and concise and you show the steps in the math! Absolutely the best. I never saw the simple harmonic motion explained like this.
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Kenneth!
@chadthunder69152 жыл бұрын
Can't believe I've never seen the Taylor expansion trick you showed before. Very elegant.
@douglasstrother65842 жыл бұрын
That goofy potential energy profile you sketched could be scoped-out using spectroscopy for an atomic or condensed matter example. The curvature of each of the local minima would generate different energy states and spectral lines. The SHO is everywhere!
@zeroTorsion2 жыл бұрын
I am a mathematician from Spain and I enjoy how clear your videos explain complex topics
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Pablo!
@bwoy12345 Жыл бұрын
I have a degree in math and physics and I only now understand what a Taylor series does. You just made sense of so much that I know
@dailopez50672 жыл бұрын
I just found your channel yesterday and how I wish I found it when I was getting my BSc in physics. Amazing work at explaining things clearly!
@YolandaGarcia-dw3wl2 жыл бұрын
I need more math intuition. I'm hopelessly lost. I liked this video. The narration was perfect
@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself2 жыл бұрын
1. I've never seen the upper-case _Omega_ used here. 2. Omega is not the natural frequency; it is the angular frequency. It has units of radians per second, because sine and cosine operate on angles, not number of cycles. Angular frequency, omega, equals 2pi×f. Where frequency, f, is in units of cycles per second (or hertz). Dimensional analysis matters!
@user-vg7zv5us5r Жыл бұрын
Ω here ya go.
@Simran-qu5ny2 жыл бұрын
Please make a video on the forced harmonic oscillator and moment of inertia....your video and way of explanation is so amazing I am really glad to see your videos😊
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Simran!
@HariharanAnnadurai7 ай бұрын
There's so much content in under 10 minutes. Really appreciate it.
@md.taohidislamtoha36152 жыл бұрын
I'm from Bangladesh. & i'm also a physics lover. Love the video. It helped me a lot & cleared a lot of confusions
@sharenrajenthiran68992 жыл бұрын
A complex concept explained elegantly! Amazing animations! Hope to see this channel grow!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sharen!
@69erthx1138 Жыл бұрын
I would have loved to have a physics teacher like you back 35 years ago. Looked at your other videos as well. You give a very clear description of quantum mechanics and field theory. Really like the comment, "...you'll see this behavior in everyday life if you PAY ATTENTION." LOL 🤓🤣
@knutritter4612 жыл бұрын
Chemistry here: You need it in chemical analytics as well. Molecules do not just rotate, they vibrate as well! And for the vibration the harmonic oscillator is used as a starting model. Later you will move on to the inharmonic one and after that: You combine those vibrations while something is rotating as well! 😉 When the vibration stretches the bond it will rotate slower... when the bond gets shorter the molecule will rotate quicker. 😉
@dlrmfemilianolako82 жыл бұрын
Very beautiful . Taylor series is the best series to make an approximation of any function that helps us to make derivative and integrals with more simplicity. Taylor series with fourier analasys ( series and transform ) help a lot when take for the first time Quantum Mechanics . Thank you so much !
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Emiliano!
@dlrmfemilianolako82 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicswithElliot 😉
@seymaozkul91022 ай бұрын
Thank you sir! You helped me a lot to learn the subject. To be honest, I never realized that the up and down motion of the ice I put into the lemonade was an oscillating motion. Or that shirts hanging on hangers are simply oscillators as they swing. Thank you, best regards!
@decreasing_entropy3003 Жыл бұрын
Extremely well explained! Combining high school Physics with a very measured amount of undergrad Physics with a very properly worded script to make a strong video on the harmonic oscillator.
@praharmitra2 жыл бұрын
Been following your videos for a long time now! They are absolutely amazing and the animations are really well done!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Prahar! Much appreciated
@tangereenclaringbold69212 жыл бұрын
My students just did a lab on Simple Harmonic Motion today and I sent them this video! Really great overview!
@M1551NGN0 Жыл бұрын
Harmonic motion is one of my favourite topics in Physics due to it eventually setting up the base for the study of mechanical waves and then EM waves, which has direct connections to Astrophysics and I love astrophysics. It's also surprisingly easy if we consider how much of its portion is present in 11th grade textbooks.
@katgirl30002 жыл бұрын
These are great. Saw a lot of this in last semester's Jr/Senior level Classical Mechanics.
@rocketpie33002 жыл бұрын
Just found your channel, I see it's growing quite well! Thank you for the great explanations!
@danieldiaz-xi5bw2 жыл бұрын
All your videos are so great and well explained I really enjoy every one of them. Greetings from Mexico 🇲🇽!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Daniel!
@0MoTheG2 жыл бұрын
A single HO is one thing, but many of them with some coupling is mind bending und fundamental.
@tomi6701 Жыл бұрын
I just learned about harmonic oscillation in my high school, but your video really blows my mind about many other stuff. Thank you very much :D
@pranithkoochana4012 жыл бұрын
Please make many videos on classical physics so that many of 11th 12th grade students can understand ur videos
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Check out the earlier videos in my "help room" playlist for more!
@kabeerfcc4153 Жыл бұрын
Elliott, please make a series on Alternating current, electronics,
@Jj-gi1sg2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic animation and explanation! I am not familiar with calculus in physics as I am in highschool but I will always wonder: would another term in term taylor series make our job so much harder? I would think we could add it for the shake of realism
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
The more terms you add the better you'll match the actual function over a wider range, but the more complicated the equation will become
@tiddlywinks4972 жыл бұрын
In 2D systems, we sometimes need these higher-order terms to properly identify the characteristics of these equilibrium points. This is a really interesting subject and you should check out Steven Strogatz' book 'Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos' in the future!
@monabbar007 Жыл бұрын
Every thing in our world is vibration(kinda harmonic)
@agrajyadav29512 жыл бұрын
Woke up and saw this. You made my day!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it Agraj!
@BariScienceLab2 жыл бұрын
My God! 7:35 was a revelation for me!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Those moments are the best!
@osamahebala69232 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great video, notes and animation. You really use an impressive way to explain these topics.
@DeepLyricist2 жыл бұрын
2:46 "How far did I pull it out" is definitely a very important question.
@user-ht6ql1rn3w Жыл бұрын
Proudest thing I have done in physics is finding time required to go to center of earth using shm
@doran3212 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation! This video contains main concepts in physics. Thank you for excellent video!
@michaelzap85286 ай бұрын
Oh my God, heroes see the same thing. When I decided to teach my son physics, the first thing I did was teach him solar system, Euler's formula, the Fourier transform, basically the circle.
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Жыл бұрын
this vid cuts through so much physics math misunderstanding it's ridiculous. How many times have I opened a physics textbook to stare at the harmonic oscillator problems, wondering what all the fuss was about? Hilarious. ONLY this vid explains the secret! thanks
@shutupimlearning2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful video! This will help a lot thanks.
@daniellim50373 күн бұрын
the stock image used as the background of this video had me thinking my computer screen was dirty
@davel7037 Жыл бұрын
I have already suffered enough as student for underrating the harmonic oscillator...its literally everywhere.
@trumanstew62232 жыл бұрын
I love this upper level stuff do you think u can go over how one would deal with using eralr and complex solution to solve harmonics
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
eralr?
@sleepygrumpy2 жыл бұрын
ummm instant sub -- wish I had your videos when I was working through Morin and ofc Kleppner all those years ago -- well done!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@mohitdhanik52742 жыл бұрын
Wow, pls keep uploading these types of videos❤
@hrperformance2 жыл бұрын
This is a first class video. Thank you very much
@zetacrucis6812 жыл бұрын
Nice one. Can we please have a part 2 on the quantum harmonic oscillator?
@asdf8asdf8asdf8asdf2 жыл бұрын
Your graph of the complex potential with nearby equilibria at different levels makes me wonder how hard it would be to extend this presentation to include a bit of catastrophe theory?
@waqasriaz41632 жыл бұрын
Wonderful demonstration sir
@carlosayam2 жыл бұрын
Great video Elliot. By the way, the 2nd Taylor expansion is also good at unstable equilibrium points. So, maybe a good idea to explain what the harmonic "oscillator" looks like in that case as well [it won't behave like an oscillator, hence my quotes - what sort of "spring" will it have?]
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Carlos! When you tap a particle away from an unstable equilibrium (which remember is like a ball at the top of a hill), it will roll down the hill and in general travel far away from where it started. So the quadratic approximation isn't very useful here, because the particle will quickly leave the region where that parabola was a good approximation to the potential
@priyamshrivastava10162 жыл бұрын
Hey !! Can you tell me through with app you do the animation work ?? it looks so beautiful and interesting🤩 , I also want to made something like these for college presentation
@probablyshadman2 жыл бұрын
Dr, please make videos about all of waves from beginner to advanced
@banana69632 жыл бұрын
This was great. I was preparing this chapter for a week and just finished it today. I've heard about the Taylor expansion trick but never understood from the explanations from the very few videos I could find on it. This helped me a lot. Liked and subbed. Thanks for your efforts :)
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks and welcome!
@wisnuape2 жыл бұрын
Another new tool learned today. Thank you.
@falakniaz476 Жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation
@jamesbond-th5bl Жыл бұрын
excellent work 👍
@tsehayenegash8394 Жыл бұрын
You have a deep knowledge please upload atmospheric physics course, atmospheric wave
@aditric2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this really lucid explanation. 😊
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful Aditri!
@owen71852 жыл бұрын
Elliott, you're fantastic, thank you, I'm benefiting a lot from your videos
@muqtarjamaegal60712 жыл бұрын
Energy equation must first
@umgeburstet8161 Жыл бұрын
also, taylor series can have a finite radius of convergence, so the series might diverge no matter how many parts you may add to the sum
@draftcypruss2 жыл бұрын
Really enjoy your videos
@coffeeguy.34382 жыл бұрын
Me: Wait, it's all harmonic oscillators? Physics: Always has been.
@samssams1619 Жыл бұрын
In case anyone is gonna see this: at approximately 8:30 he is using u‘(0)x but u‘(0) and every higher derivative should just be 0 aswell therefore an approximation around the equlibrium point would only be u(0). First question: am i right with this? Second question: why isnt he using another formula for the taylor series when not developing his function at 0 but at 0+a (with a being the offset)? As far as im concerned the formula then looks different.
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Жыл бұрын
Hi [fill in blank] -- When you're near the equilibrium point, the higher powers of x will be smaller and smaller, because they're powers of a tiny number. Take a look at my video on Taylor series for more explanation
@kirillvarchenko56912 жыл бұрын
Interestingly that we can do the same trick for the minimum of U_{eff} from the video about orbits and then get the same result from the exact formula for r(\theta) by Taylor expansion at \epsilon=0 (which apparently corresponds to low energy, almost "harmonic oscillator" case)
@omaralhafez5014 Жыл бұрын
You are great Elliot! Thanks for such brilliant explanation and interpretation of modern physics ❤ I really love what you are presenting. And the content is useful and .... And just great ❤
@padipucast2 жыл бұрын
Well presented
@HS-vn9rt2 ай бұрын
You are awesome. Thank you so much for top quality lessons.
@alijoueizadeh2896 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your time and effort.
@albertoreyabuelo25042 жыл бұрын
Broke my mind
@cabdallahahmad72882 жыл бұрын
Thanks my best lecturer
@Mayank-mf7xr2 жыл бұрын
Amazingly explained.
@YouTubeFunHandle10 ай бұрын
Great explanation. One minor point, if the force reference point to the left, wouldn’t F be kx instead of -kx?
@shraddhagore24352 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot Elliot, your videos help a lot!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Happy it helped Shraddha!
@notsoslimshady4315 Жыл бұрын
Damn nice explanation. Good work bro. Keep it up.
@ItachiUchiha-wk3zm2 жыл бұрын
What an amazing video
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Itachi!
@michelefabi12052 жыл бұрын
great class, good job!
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Michele!
@krishnapadanaskar3329 Жыл бұрын
From India , 😊
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Жыл бұрын
can you do a vid on how the quantum potential energy is in the real part of the Schroedringer equation but originates from noncommutative nonlocality as explained in Moyal algebra? thanks
@sarthmhatre34272 жыл бұрын
Can you please explain the velocity and pressure relation in the Bernoulli's equation, i mean not mathematically but physically like how does more velocity actually makes the pressure go down in fluids.
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
I will add Bernoulli's equation to my list of potential topics! It's essentially the statement of conservation of energy for a simple fluid, where the pressure force produces an extra term in the potential energy
@user-vg7zv5us5r Жыл бұрын
@@PhysicswithElliot hehe, "potential" playlist. All about them potential.
@goopyt2672 жыл бұрын
i really love ur videos.....amazing explanations and in detailed manner thankuu
@chiragsharma12192 жыл бұрын
Great job 👍
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Chirag!
@gerrycrabtree3274 Жыл бұрын
He said innocuous and ubiquitous in the same sentence. Yes I needed spell check.
@manishsramon Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, man!
@AM-gx3dy2 жыл бұрын
Man, Thank you so much
@Noah_Krakatoa Жыл бұрын
Highly recommend the book Waves and Oscillations by Walter Fox Smith to dive deeper into this topic; there’s some errata to the book published online, but overall is excellent
@rajinfootonchuriquen Жыл бұрын
Maybe one could define a piece-wise potential aproximation using parabolas for the steady points
@memsuniverse Жыл бұрын
great explanation thank you so much for your effort
@CarlosRamos-me7kg2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant ! Thanks a lot.
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Carlos!
@imaginaryuniverse6322 жыл бұрын
Would the stable equilibrium point be the same as a barycenter? Would it's position be a Planck length? Hey I just found this channel it does a good job of letting you know what you need to know even though I don't know half of what it says 🤔.
@trumanstew62232 жыл бұрын
this was amazing thanks
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Truman!
@idontevenhaveapla722411 ай бұрын
Thank you
@vonzo55 Жыл бұрын
I just got an idea for my next Max/MSP little instrument
@ramansb89242 жыл бұрын
Can you do video about tensors??
@PhysicswithElliot2 жыл бұрын
Probably! At the very least I definitely want to talk about the electromagnetic field strength tensor in the near future and write down the action for electromagnetism