IELTS Academic Writing Task 1 - Table Lesson 2

[@mariaboriasova6793]

Sadly, I probably won't have the time to do math like calculating 3/4 of the data in the exam (taking into consideration that doing the simplest maths task under pressure makes me so anxious), but otherwise thanks for the great lesson. Probably one of the best on describing structure and data grouping as well as providing some advanced vocabulary that I've seen so far.

[@cake.eater.]

This is a really tough one for me. by the way, Thank you for making this useful video!

[@lisapham6747]

Hi, I'd like to say thank you for the content of your channel which is pretty useful for other individuals and me. A week prior to my exam, I couldn't undo the knot in my writing skill, but then, I have stumbled upon this channel and started being absorbed in its lessons whose no description of their high quality. Finally, I"d like to tell you that I have just got 7.0 in Writing this morning. Thank you very much

[@souha3233]

great! was it hard?

[@gulnaraahkoy7257]

is it possible to make two groups like 1. Church of England, Roman Catholic, Other Christian,and second group is Non Christian and No religion?

[@GeorgeChuy]

Exactly as I think. The first three groups fall into category of Christians. Actually their attitude towards same sex marriage is quite similar.

[@AliRamatov-f1j]

She explained in a easy way, by the way thank you for helpful video❤.

[@erfan_khayyati]

I owe you my score ! FANTASTIC

[@shanesheoran6251]

Everything explained superbly. Really great work, and thanks for freebies.

[@ravitabhattarai4979]

I like the way you group the task. I appreciate your hard work. thank you for making a video.

[@BestMyTest]

Thank you for your kind words.

[@souha3233]

thank you the best channel and teacher!

[@SymbatSapargalieva]

thank you soooo much 💗💗💗

[@MonssterHD]

Underrated channel

[@ayukayuk7585]

Its a logical table. Thanks alot

[@Md-jp3kf]

Thank you for your great videos , I just wanna ask if using “5 time intervals “ is right ?

[@MA47777]

Thank you so much.I learned lots of dazzling stuff from your chanel.

[@АяЖан-н5ш]

I think "over the last 5 years" means the 5 consecutive years. However, in the table above, the years aren't consecutive

[@jingdong3934]

I think so. I don't even understand what "the last five years" mean? If this essay was written in 2020, "last five years" should mean "2015-2020" rather than "2007- 2013"(which is a six year period , not five years).

[@Poor_Georgie]

Nicely presented. Please the fractions you used for non chrsitian and non religious don't add up for me. How random can we be? And how specific should we be with the math cos it seem way off when I calculate it

[@mikipatel8118]

Its too helpful for everyone

[@muleyaprecious5972]

This is the tough one for me, but thank you

[@russellmcmurray3267]

You have been teaching me a lot, I cant dismiss that but for the first example of the video, you made it so madly confusing, I mean there are thousands of ways to group that table and I think you chose the one with a poor quality and complicated resolution. Thanks anyway.

[@ThanhThanh-vf2fe]

this lesson really makes me confusing! I don't understand how to write this table! Wait a minute, from 1989 to 1995, and the period is 5 years?????? (1995 - 1989 = 6?????)

[@karandeepsingh8006]

Damn u make me also 🤔

[@jingdong3934]

This teacher's math is pretty bad, so she made us very confused.

[@aayushpaudel2379]

For non-christian the increased percentage should be 2/3 (2/3*30=20) which is close to 19. Also, for no-religion (3/4*80=60) (77 approx. equal to 80 and 64 approx equal to 64). Correct me if I am wrong?

[@dhirendrasah0209]

Thanks for video

[@jamilahanau]

Please is cancellation allowed in writing task?

[@nhatanhphan9005]

What is the differences between "differing" and "diferent"😢?

[@johnkennethbelmonte9369]

thank you for this. im just wondering for table with different age groups (18-34, 35-40, etc.) how can this be effectively categorized? the other data is the activity of different age groupers (watching tv, play video games, etc) appreciate your feedback

[@sassyjasy]

I have same questions Because I'm unable to organize those it delays alot

[@kurseng]

outdoor activities and indoor activities.

[@cykko_thai]

please understand the difference between "increased by" and "increased to"

[@gameoff637]

For example, obesity rate was 34 % If Obesity rate increased to 60 %, it's rate 60%,but If it increased by 60%,it's rate 94% (60%+34%)

[@angieaguirre3563]

watching looks easy but at the moment to do it is not so simple

[@hxurso5647]

exactly, when you start writing you just forget everything😭

[@13enyamin79]

I watched all lessons from this teacher, and it was great so far. This report, however, I think has some problems. Firstly the first body does not have enough numbers and percentages. Secondly, one in five means 20% not 5%!!

[@soemoe5087]

77%= three quarters and 30%= a third (you don't need to calculate anything). And she said increased to (not increased by). But her putting non-religion group into 4x group is not cool! She should have written about the 4x increase for people with religions and wrote the NR group in a separate sentence. (20>>>64 is not 4 times) My attempt to fix: Between 1989 and 2007, the support for same-sex marriage increased nearly four-fold across all religious groups, rising from approximately 5-10% initially to around 20-40% in 2007. The percentage of those with no religious affiliations was 20% in 1989 and 64% in 2007, in a stark contrast to non-Christians, at 5% and 19%. In 2007 the gap between Christians and non-Christians in support for same sex marriage remained stable at a ratio of around 6:3 respectively; the exception is the Church of England followers, whose gap with non-Christians decreased to 5:3. In 2013, the acceptance rate for same-gender marriage amongst Christians surged, surpassing half the population at 55% for Church of England constituents, 61% for Roman Catholics and 54% for other Christians. Meanwhile, the figure for secular individuals continued to increase, exceeding three quarters, whereas those with non-Christian faiths remained lowest at one-third.

[@JosephineSangalala-ws1nt]

It was supposed to be 6 years not 5 years

[@emmanuelmukoya6590]

I am kind of lost here, how is 64 to 77 a 0.75 increase? looks like a fifth? please help, I could be looking at different figures

[@ajazpatel9475]

tough one

[@bhawanigurung9913]

The table seems to be really complicated than others

[@safari7261]

it is too complicated, you made it quite difficult for me

[@Docorif]

4 time intervals? This one was a big of a long stretch.

[@souha3233]

we could talk about the first 3 ones together because they are related to christianity, and then the last ones together

[@cletusngwerume2566]

could i have grouped my key features into Christians and no religion and non christians

[@thaolinhtran6635]

between 2007 and 2013, no religion should have increased 1/4, not 3/4

[@jingdong3934]

So do I. This demo essay is really bad. Terrible.

[@sumandatta5431]

Most of them are not working

[@sagarpande9527]

You have made a great video. However, you are so fast. For better understanding, you should have spoken slowly.

[@ShitalSavant-f1l]

tough

[@jingdong3934]

"Five-fold‘’? For no religion, it changed from 20 to 77, which increased five-fold? Nonsense.

[@JustinMss]

It must be four-fold /20*4=80 , 77 approximately 80

[@jingdong3934]

I don't think this is a good demo essay. Are you sure "one in five" means 5 percent? Ridiculous.

[@puterisarah3614]

It means 20. That's why she said less than one in five, since the figure is 19%, read the sentence again

[@soemoe5087]

@puterisarah3614 is correct, but she slipped and spoke 5%.

[@sassyjasy]

This is confusing

[@Poor_Georgie]

Me too

[@jingdong3934]

Very bad demonstration essay. It is full of wrong ideas.