Top 5 Bizarre Rules Moments

[@danimation8422]

It always annoys me how they show the reaction of the substitute that didn’t actually touch the ball, it was another sub standing next to him

[@eddixon2015]

As someone who worked in broadcasting previously, directors use the player’s numbers when they tell cameramen who to get closeups of of. Obviously, that can’t be done when the players are wearing warmups. My guess is that the cameraman who got the shot was given unclear instructions of who to shoot because he wasn’t able to look at replay which would have shown him exactly who touched it. Obviously though, that’s not a good thing to have happen because it puts the blame on the wrong guy.

[@iaindw1]

the opposition should have missed. wheeling away as if they had scored a wounder goal.

[@danimation8422]

@@eddixon2015 Ah alr that makes sense

[@vitesse_arnhem]

@@iaindw1 Exactly. The red player 35 should have kicked the ball out of bounds.

[@mikulitsi1819]

3:00 Always forget that it's enough for the goalkeeper to not touch the ball on a situation like this

[@mohamedaweys7731]

The commentator literally said that you can't score a throw in you have to touch it before it goes in

[@mikulitsi1819]

@@mohamedaweys7731 And I heard that... Just was saying that I always forget that rule like now I didn't remember before the commentator said it

[@mohamedaweys7731]

@R.Y.G wdym?

[@WERTYUIO821]

@R.Y.G No goal is allowed to be scored from a throw in no matter the side.

[@jorgediaz2247]

@@mohamedaweys7731 you're the one that's confused

[@awemanyfit]

I never knew about some of these rules. That substitute touching the ball before it went out. Wow😂 the substitute never expected that he just wanted to stop the ball for his goal keeper lol

[@user-jc8zm6ef8p]

That rule is the more obvious one...

[@grumpyref]

The referee doesn't have any choice because the touch occurred in the penalty area. The rule was made so that the penalty for interference by the substitutes was harsh. We can't have them interfering in such a game critical area. It used to be an indirect free kick, but then team officials and substitutes were stopping goals.... Was the ball probably going out of play, yes. BUT, with that much spin on it it had a very slight chance if staying in. The guys NEED to leave the ball alone. At that moment they are not a part of the game.

[@CruiserDynasty]

@Ego Master reffs can pick what they inforce with in reason, like a reff cant reverse a call after its been made or they cant give two cards at the same time, that would be extending the rules then.

[@RUBBER_BULLET]

I seem to recall that he was a new signing and that was literally his first competitive touch of the ball for his new club.

[@aagg6124]

It is unclear to me though, why it is a penalty and not an indirect free kick.

[@JohnMushitu]

Conceding a penalty from the bench 😭

[@SamuelPearlman]

he shoulda been "on the bench", he wouldn't have conceded a penalty!

[@danielhupje2168]

@@SamuelPearlman well he was warming up

[@SamuelPearlman]

@@danielhupje2168 /whooosh The comment was he conceded a penalty "from the bench", but he wasn't on the bench :D

[@caelancarnachan]

@@SamuelPearlman u know nothing go and talk cringe in another video

[@finneas9894]

@@SamuelPearlman using /whoosh is already cringe but even more cringe when u use it incorrectly

[@donovandownes5064]

3:18 the camera quality is pretty good for the 1920 season

[@nasikasf9625]

bro has a degree in film-making

[@10mibrahim]

The Bundesliga never fail to entertain us

[@Swaggymrb53st]

Lol so cap

[@ayasmitachakraborty5672]

Adminho never disappoint us😅❤

[@falsealarms]

4:18 Speechless & I love it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😁

[@honeysuckle7885]

This clip has always annoyed me as he isn't the player that touches the ball. Michael Eberwein not Lee Jae-sung touches the ball, but every video of the incident focuses on the South Korean player.

[@ameriah6789]

@@honeysuckle7885 sorry but he is not Jae-sung Lee. he is Young-jae Seo.

[@SamuelPearlman]

I LOVE at 1:35, guy is like, "Here's yer shirt, dude."

[@nasikasf9625]

thx, its not like i didnt watch the video

[@debasmitachakraborty5883]

The first one surprises me the most😂❤

[@nicor6415]

Try to attend a course with your local referee-association. I'll promise you will leave it mindblown once you realised all the rules, you never heard of in a game you thought you are an expert in. ☺️

[@guacca]

It's like offside rule. Most people think they understand it, but more often than not they're perplexed by goals allowed or disallowed from offside rule. It's more complex than it seems.

[@johnp8131]

What surprises me is that the players and staff are unaware of these rules? Not so much today but back in the eighties I had 'disagreements' with my German mates, over their 'interpretation' of the rules.

[@supermgaming1308]

I love this channel

[@nasikasf9625]

we dont care, also i dont love this channel

[@offthehookproductions4481]

I get that a double touch is prohibited but can you make a case that a simultaneous touch is allowed?

[@stevenrix7024]

He was very unlucky. You can see he was worried about the ground around the penalty spot and, lo and behold, his left foot slipped as he tried to shoot with his right. Do you have to take a penalty kick with the ball on the spot? Or can you move it back half a metre, if you are more confident about striking the penalty better from there?

[@Pluma-mo4ds]

Yes, simultaneous touches are allowed, and the penalty would be legal if that was the case, but it is extremely rare to see simultaneous touches

[@WERTYUIO821]

All of them are reasonable. Even the substitution being given a foul at the place of the offense. In cases like that you mostly laugh. Unless you are the unlucky side.

[@isaiahrosner3780]

I don't get that one. It was clearly going into touch. Why have that rule?

[@andersmhc]

@@isaiahrosner3780 So that subs can't interfere with the play. And if there is a case where it would happen, the rulebook already accounts for it; to give a freekick from the contact position. Seems 100% logical and resonable to me.

[@carloclemente8026]

@@isaiahrosner3780 if the rule that a substitute can't interfere when the ball is in play you would see substitues playing and saving goals. The rule it's made to guarantee only 11 vs 11 players are on the field and can play

[@HiArashi13]

@@carloclemente8026 and to clarify that even more, refs don't really have any saying in that to avoid any controversies.

[@user-zy9nd2ei2j]

Look just let it fly 😉 Nein this is German precision referring

[@FireSonata]

I thought the Schalke vs Leverkusen goal will be in it, and the rule will be that you don't have to wait for all the players to return to their positions before resuming play.

[@SaturnusDK]

The rules have always been clear on that. As long as all the players, except the kicker, are on their own half the kickoff can proceed.

[@FoodTech41]

The number 4 and 2 ones are very unique. I didnt know ref can give penalties after whistle is blown.

[@YouTubecanbitemyhairybanger]

Ha! Clearly you've never heard of play until man u win time... They gave them a penalty 6 minutes after the FINAL whistle...

[@BoliveiraNTPW]

Damn, in Germany the player can’t climb the fence or be close to the crowd , in Brasil if this happens the ref doesn’t do nothing. It’s interesting how each league have some interesting takes to the rules.

[@Vegeta-dn6lk]

We in Europe are dumb so that's why

[@riquetrique99]

what ??? Pedro do flamengo literally got a yellow card for celebrating with the crowd and then the VAR pointed out the offside and still kept the card, this rule is universal

[@Luddevige]

A player lost his finger klinging on to the fence. They dont want to repeat that, and thus this rule exists.

[@duck1sgood]

@@Vegeta-dn6lk players jumping into the crowd can cause wicked chaos especially in highly competitive leagues

[@arthurgordon6072]

If the ref doesn't do nothing, then that means he does something 🙄

[@P.K...]

Good content

[@slothsetryt8071]

If the player touches the ball before it goes out I think it should be an indirect free kick not a penalty

[@diegoscalvinoni9899]

Rules say that it's a direct free kick, that becomes a penalty if is in the penalty area. Think about a different situation: the ball is going clearly in the goal, and the keeper is already beaten, while a substitute player enters in the pitch and saves it. Obviously he will receive a red card, but the team in attack will only get an indirect free kick, which means almost all the opposite players to be in the barrier. So instead of a clear goal you get just a free kick with lot of people between the ball and the goal

[@diegoscalvinoni9899]

That's why IFAB decided for a direct free kick/penalty: because instead of a goal you get a very big opportunity to score a new one

[@slothsetryt8071]

@@diegoscalvinoni9899 but it wasn't going in it was going out for a goal kick

[@diegoscalvinoni9899]

@@slothsetryt8071 yep, mine was just an example to make easier to understand why IFAB decided for the direct free kick. I know that the situation that happened in that match is paradoxical, but the rule is this. And if you have to write a rule you can't be too specific or we will have a rulebook with more than 1000 rules just for what happens if a substitute enters without permission

[@Subangelis]

@@slothsetryt8071 - It doesn't matter what it was *going* to do, all that matters is *where* the ball is in that *moment*

[@JJtoob]

I remember seeing in Mexico a game where whatever rule was broken, the rule called to take a shot from the goal's small rectangle. I've never seen that again, to the point I'm not sure if I dreamed it.

[@scottrastyles2592]

I think there is a rules about taking a free kick inside the box, but further research is required

[@vitesse_arnhem]

Look up “indirect free kicks from the six yard line”

[@AdrianP3833]

They should add a rule where you get sent off for scoring too many own goals, right Adminho?

[@andyyploy]

lewandowski, haaland and shick would be more red carded than ramos.

[@alankardevta9190]

@@andyyploy He's asking for red cards for too many OWN GOALS, and not just goals.

[@andyyploy]

@@alankardevta9190 ohh nevermind my bad

[@joefernandes4256]

How many is too many

[@andyyploy]

@@joefernandes4256 a hat-trick of them.

[@SomeIcelandicDude]

Rough for Kainz lol

[@vandal_4042]

Premier league referees should learn something from Bundesliga referees

[@andreasapelqvist9247]

The substitute touching the ball before it went over the line imo :)

[@hmoham]

Oddly enough I knew about the touching the ball from a throw rule from a manga I read years ago.

[@tmsztrsz]

rule from no. 2 is really weird. it should be an indirect free kick or a corner kick. penalty really doesn't make sense.

[@martenkats6915]

Interference from somebody who isn't playing (reserve, coach etc.) with play by touching the ball is a direct free kick, so in the box it's a penalty. I believe that rule was introduced after a few cases where it deliberately happened to prevent a goal. I remember an incident in a Dutch cup game when a club physio ran onto the pitch and prevented the goal. All the ref could do at the time was to send the physio off and award a drop ball as the rules didn't account for giving a penalty back then, which would obviously have been justified. So the change makes sense. It's unfortunate for this player as it clearly wasn't deliberate, but the referee had no choice.

[@konradmieszkowicz4265]

Is that Buffon in the thumbnail?! Lol

[@jadenchok]

Adminho the best...🤩

[@IDeltic]

What would happen if Ziegler didn't touch the ball and it went in? How would they restart play?

[@P.K...]

Its Zieler

[@bartekbielawski2066]

From the rules of the game: A goal cannot be scored directly from a throw-in: • if the ball enters the opponents’ goal - a goal kick is awarded • if the ball enters the thrower’s goal - a corner kick is awarded

[@IDeltic]

@@bartekbielawski2066 Ah, thank you.

[@thesuomi8550]

A corner because it goes over the end line

[@fabiofussball]

Lee (edit: Eberwein) against Bochum...a memorable moment, and i never understand the reasons why. No make sense

[@hugogogo13]

The penalty given for touching the ball before it's out should have been a slow pass to the goalkeeper. Never understood why they never cease the opportunity to shine with fair-play.

[@dannyhhewitt]

Exactly what I thought.

[@eriklinderstam2140]

When the penalty kick was first introduced to football in 1891 it was a lot of controversy. Since it was a game for gentlemen, a lot of people saw it as an insult that there had to be rules to regulate intentional unfair play. The team Corinthian FC took their protest to the extreme and refused to score on penalty kicks.

[@dannyhhewitt]

@@eriklinderstam2140 Yep. They also refused to defend penalties given against them. The goalkeeper would stand to one side.

[@hugogogo13]

@@eriklinderstam2140 very interesting! Thank you, I wasn't aware of that at all

[@blueline7335]

"Rules are rules", says the book of rules. 📙

[@SamuelPearlman]

It's "Laws"

[@ZartruS]

The two last one are super weird. Their law but application of the law should be proportioned of what and how it happen on the pitch.

[@terryrichmond4428]

No rules were violated during this video

[@davidpanken]

That last rule.. If it’s not taken in a penalty shootout, what happens then? Can he re-take the penalty? Is it a foul, so should a free kick to the opposing team be given?

[@jonpinyan]

The first touch is considered taking the penalty. The second touch violates the rule that the kicker can't play the ball again until it has touched someone else, so yes, there would be an indirect free kick awarded to the opponents.

[@maddoctor99]

To be fair, the last guy was lucky to get away with crashing out of the competition, and not end up with a broken ankle for that nasty slip.

[@nasikasf9625]

is that a threat?

[@supremefantastic]

The last penalty kick in goal was not a goal because the player fell during he kicked the ball into the goal? Ridiculous.

[@scottl.1568]

@2:37 -- BAD AND THEY SHOULD FEEL BAD

[@Do_not_assume]

The only stupid rule is the substitute touching the ball. Give him a yellow card but a penalty?

[@skintslots]

It seems stupid because it seems more of a technical offencel,punishable by an indirect free kick,rather than a penal offence,punishable by direct free kick or penalty.Have any of these laws been updated since the incidents?

[@Do_not_assume]

@@skintslots I've no idea if the laws have been updated it not. What would happen if the substitute was from the attacking team?

[@addisonfung5009]

1:48 They have confirmed that the foul was committed BEFORE the half time whistle was blown, right? Because if it was after the half time whistle then it’s not a penalty kick.

[@Conici_AU]

It would still be a penalty

[@antlereddruid8359]

it was after the whistle but as long as the referee is still on the pitch he can call everyone back out for the penalty.

[@jonnysaccount1149]

why would the players keep playing AFTER teh half time whistle? it was obviously before lol.

[@WERTYUIO821]

@@antlereddruid8359 He said committed, not given. The offense happened before the whistle but it was given after

[@SamuelPearlman]

@@antlereddruid8359 the handling offense was BEFORE the whistle.

[@gwenwalravens8030]

The only rule I didn't know was that throw-in goals don't count.

[@nasikasf9625]

Why do u have a girl's name, ur like 40 mate

[@gwenwalravens8030]

@@nasikasf9625 I don't have a girl's name. And yes, I'm over 40. What's your problem?

[@jonny_vdv]

With the half-time penalty call, was the offending player booked for the DOGSO too? That would be an especially sombre dressing room afterwards.

[@MrCho14]

It wasn't DOGSO. The ball wasn't headed toward goal and there was a defender who was in the most likely path. It doesn't really check any of the boxes for DOGSO.

[@hashbrown6057]

The referee on the thumbnail looks like Gianluigi Buffon

[@ianraffel7505]

Players should be booked for celebrating/gesticulating in front of opposition fans rather than their own ones. More chance of inviting a riot.

[@MGWA6891]

Nah, that type of shithousery is why we love football.

[@stisoisfnr7769]

Last one is terrible rule when the pitch where he takes the penalty is that bad!!! And therefor that was a terrible call by the judge!! Hopefully the judge looked at it later and realized why that was not so good!

[@WillemvanKalsbeek]

For me it's the double yellow for shirt and fence.

[@nasikasf9625]

i hate to break it to you but fences don't play soccer

[@WillemvanKalsbeek]

@@nasikasf9625 You would think, theplay stops with the first yellow card

[@csm2455]

There’s no way no. 2 should be a penalty, might be in the rules but it’s not in the sprit of the game.

[@Kevinrothwell1959]

Highly paid professionals should know all the rules inside out! Good grief it's not rocket science! Clubs should educate their players.

[@a_7lexmusic]

My brain before and after the video: What?

[@nf-zarkzy8850]

last one

[@MattBike]

its painfull but rules has to be straight forward

[@terpymonkey7979]

Penalty should count

[@mar2540]

Been aware of the last curious rule break thanks to the league cup final in 2003/04: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZDEYo2gYt2DfpI. They got it wrong on that day so its nice to see the Bundesliga getting it right.

[@cnxexpat1862]

1st. Every player should know the rules that you´ll get a yellow card for taking off the shirt. 2nd. Why do players take off the shirts after a goal/success? I have never seen this by example from a salesman in a shop after the success of selling an expensive item.

[@oilie1209]

How are you trying to compare a customer service job to a thrilling sport 😂😂

[@cnxexpat1862]

@@oilie1209 It was an example of people they have success. You also can think at sportsmen like tennis, golf or whatever players. Nobody takes off his shirt after a hole in hole or winning a set.

[@paulberry2884]

Bizarrely the same commentator was at every match!!!

[@nasikasf9625]

yea bro its his job

[@neilmertin1438]

the keeper didnt have both feet on the line either before the player took the pen and committed the foul so shouldn't be a re take

[@SamuelPearlman]

Incorrect, stop it at 4:37, goalkeeper still had 1 foot on the line when it was kick. BUT, even if he didn't, in the laws of the game it states that if the kicker and goalkeeper both are guilty of an offense, it is the kicker who is penalized as they are presumed to have caused (right or not) the goalkeeper to make an offense.

[@eddieherrera5314]

Number 3 was Stuttgart vs who?? And what season

[@alexjacobs8618]

It was against Werder Bremen. I can’t remember what season, but it was in 2018

[@KillBillVaggeli13]

I was playing 5 side and as a goalie I was playing like a libero. We had a corner and I was at the center spot and missed a backpass while slightly touching the ball. This resulted into an own goal. Had I not touched the goal wouldn't stand. You can't score an own Goal from a corner

[@crisdunbar4753]

Huh, I didn't know that you couldn't get an own goal directly off a corner. Incredibly rare in 11's, less so in 5 a side I suppose, but either way I don't actually see the reasoning for it. If you can score a goal directly off a corner, why not an own goal?

[@jensnrgaard724]

I disagree with the #1... When it's a doubletouch caused by a slip because the grass around the spot is bad, it should just count as a goal.

[@whittar]

Not a goal but imo should be allowed to be retaken.

[@Louis-du9it]

If you touch the Ball twice it doesn't count. A Rule needs to have a clear definition and shouldn't say "But the goal coints if it's on accident". Otherwise you could just pass the ball to yourself

[@jensnrgaard724]

@@Louis-du9it yeah of corse, what I mean is that the rule should specify that slipping is not the same as passing it to yourself and should count as a goal

[@WERTYUIO821]

@@jensnrgaard724 A player could potentially get minor advantage over the Goalkeeper by putting his foot as close to the ball and confuse the Goalkeeper. An unfortunate event when the grass is slippery but both sides are affected the same way so no one gets an advantage.

[@alexjacobs8618]

I mean he was part of the reason the spot was bad, he was scuffing it with his foot before he took the penalty

[@jackwilcox5811]

Peter enckleman!!!!

[@trorisk]

dura lex, sed lex

[@Blahem1]

_These rules are obvious and known if you know football.._

[@sumaiyachowdhury8967]

weird

[@nasikasf9625]

yes u are

[@gejamugamlatsoomanam7716]

Really stupid, every footballer knows taking off shirt is a yellow and they still do it and get surprised when they get booked

[@nasikasf9625]

also get a shorter name next time

[@cornelliusdimasberlin3985]

This is the most cruel rules that not every footballer know about those type of rules

[@hgscorpion]

not nowing the rules is no excuse. just like if you dont now the law u still cant break it

[@brunoribeiromachado3332]

é cada coisa estranha no futebol,mas,que bom que isso acontece

[@kayceeazubike2182]

These rules are crazy and funny . Wtf! 😂😂

[@klamin_original]

Also dass wir Deutschen ein VPN nutzen müssen, um sowas überhaupt sehen zu dürfen, ist einfach mal richtig beschissen.

[@nasikasf9625]

espanol?

[@BoringExtrovert]

3:22 I know it's the law, but I were the ref I would have given it because it had no impact on the game.

[@WERTYUIO821]

The referee has to give it. Similarly to an out of play foul that is a straight red card and foul given even if it doesn't affect the play.

[@BoringExtrovert]

@@WERTYUIO821 an out of play foul is rather different. This kind of foul can lead to bigger fights which will lead to disruptions to the game, or perhaps an injury the would force a player off the pitch

[@thesuomi8550]

@@BoringExtrovert yeah but what if it doesn't?

[@omardiecast64]

Di liga indonesia juga banyak keanehan yang terjadi dari wasit 🤭😀

[@mrnotdoneyet6909]

how is number 2 a penalty? i understand a yellow card, but a penalty? besides the shot would have gone out anyway so whats the point ?

[@ambrascetnarwhal2695]

A substitute made the foul that should be punished with a direct free kick (or penalty kick) if it happened within the lenghtened line of the penalty area.

[@yeetpotatoes69420]

LoL

[@matedrabant5284]

Huszti Szabolcs!!!

[@therealMeastro]

nr 4 isnt bizarre

[@srjt1684]

Number 2 is bullshit. The guy was just trying to help by stopping the ball as it was clearly leaving the pitch for a goal kick

[@iaindw1]

it proves players are thick

[@nasikasf9625]

Iain W ayoo? u moving a bit fruity

[@aviserig]

Bundesliga refs are the best in the world

[@nasikasf9625]

nah, u havent me all the refs itw so u cant judge them all.

[@aviserig]

@@nasikasf9625 well I live in the U.S. and we have some of the worst.

[@dejanlisica3291]

2

[@BMH1965]

The goal keeper should have known about the throw-in rule (he should have let the ball roll into the goal).

[@magnusmcgee993]

Throw-in: Not the goalkeepers fault! (When there's no pressure) You NEVER pass back or throw towards the goal, M

[@ondank]

The substitute one is a rubbish rule IMO. If it causes an issue with the integrity of the game, then sure, give the foul ... but so often in these situations the ball clearly would have gone out.

[@shaneomoore]

Not that interesting in the end

[@nasikasf9625]

why're you watching it then, just leave the video

[@kurumpli6087]

Huszti😔

[@nasikasf9625]

cheers jeff

[@saskakarlsson9600]

HATE VAR

[@nasikasf9625]

who asked

[@danielilibman8087]

That Penalty for the ball not crossing the line is the most BS i have ever seen in my life... that should never stand

[@misterkitab]

🤯😅😢

[@zoltaegyhazi8488]

I am watch the Hamburg Köln match the pentalis is reaped. But he is dont.

[@jackwicks215]

That sub incident shouldnt have happened. Subs arent allowed to warm up behind the goal

[@alfredlorenzen868]

Some of these are very much the *letter of the law' rather than the spirit.

[@hainguyenthi7656]

😂

[@mushabumayr6397]

Those who watch Premier League

[@LiamKenmuir]

Adminho, can you please make a really clickbait video?

[@oxerful5426]

Wait do the Bundesliga still have fences? I was watching the game when the Hillsborough disaster happened, if they didn't have fences then fans would've been able to get on the pitch and survive

[@lukashahn6883]

if they didn't mismanage Hillsborough then the disaster wouldn't have happened. The issue wasn't the fence it was bad management.

[@oxerful5426]

@@lukashahn6883 Yes but the bad management wouldn't have been deadly if it weren't for the fence

[@lukashahn6883]

@@oxerful5426 That's a reason for better management and not for banning fences.

[@frpgplayer]

Bizarre rules? It's the rules not enforced because of the money. Kids play soccer. Adults play soccer. As an official, the laws of the game in lower levels I enforce. But, these same players will ask why enforce rules that no one else does. Really? No one? The rules are enforced by real officials who adhere to the laws of the game. You wont be promoted to higher levels because the laws must NOT be enforced. Keepers jumping off their line, keepers holding the ball for 15+ seconds, the ridiculous grabbing in the 18 on corner kicks, yellow cards for violent conduct/serious foul play (take the test- it says to ignore the referee in the video and answer how it should be), and the worse? Biters and fakers.

[@nasikasf9625]

bro no one's reading that, learn to paraphrase

[@frpgplayer]

@@nasikasf9625 lol

[@jarsonjarecki4059]

LewanSkillski 💪

[@nasikasf9625]

Jarson stick to the day job

[@tashigamer5137]

NEUER video pizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 1

[@neilmertin1438]

these celebration rules really out of hand like as long as its not racist blatantly disrespectful let them do what they want

[@kinsu4847]

ไทยรวมตัว