Top 5 Diamond Aircraft Comparison 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

  Рет қаралды 233,802

Aviation Federation

Aviation Federation

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 104
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation 2 жыл бұрын
*How would you rate each of these 5 aircraft models from Diamond Aircraft? What other features are you looking for in a small plane? Let us know what you think! To see more exciting aircraft videos, check these out:* Top 5 Cheapest Twin-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2HPYZypg7p0kLM Top 5 Single-Engine Piston Airplanes Around $500K kzbin.info/www/bejne/l4GZlWljjLCBn6c&t Top 3 Cirrus Aircraft Price Comparison 2022-2023 2022-2023 | New Features kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6SseqSfmbVsa9E
@albertattwood8746
@albertattwood8746 Күн бұрын
If They gave the DA50 rg the same range and flight ceiling as the DA 62 they would have a Winner in a single engine aircraft.
@josh885
@josh885 2 жыл бұрын
Diamond really needs a model above the DA62 with the DA50RG engines so it can hit at least 200kts and ideally a pressurized cabin.
@moviefalk177
@moviefalk177 2 жыл бұрын
So true
@_purge9488
@_purge9488 Жыл бұрын
Yea the 20K ceiling made me laugh knowing that it’s depressurized lol
@petkuscinta9797
@petkuscinta9797 10 ай бұрын
I was just wondering if CD300 Turbo is superior to other non-Continental engines. I really like the DA50 RG but are two Aestro motors safer than one CD300?
@albertattwood8746
@albertattwood8746 Күн бұрын
Yes they need to punch a lot higher, range, speed, flight ceiling and a 5 bladed prop. Not to mention pressurised cockpit.
2 жыл бұрын
Estes aviões da Diamond me fascinam! Já ouvi pilotos experientes dizerem, que os bimotores desta marca são superlativamente eficientes, econômicos e seguros. Só me falta a grana pra adquirir um destes! Um da linha dos monomotores já seria um luxo sem tamanho pra mim. Sonhar não paga imposto né! ☺️
@huto9606
@huto9606 2 жыл бұрын
Für mich das beste Flugzeug in dieser Klasse. Das Unternehmen ist langsam von Jahr zu Jahr gewachsten. Alle gewonnen Erkenntnisse wurden in der nächsten Generation von Flugzeugen berücksichtigt. Nur so ist ein Erfolg und eine Weiterentwicklung möglich. Das stetig wachsende bring dich zu einer guten Ernte.
@richardgripe5888
@richardgripe5888 2 жыл бұрын
Looking for 300hp. per side and 200kt cruise, maybe pressurized
@ShinLeeChan
@ShinLeeChan Жыл бұрын
Loved these aircrafts till Chinese became the owner! They still need more power 'cause engines are underpower but safe.
@sosochio4374
@sosochio4374 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese owner produces millions of vehicle wheels and rims annually and is the OEM for many automakers worldwide. I would suggest you throw your car's wheels away if you really don't like the Chinese owner and maybe throw your wife's car's wheels or even your parents' because those wheels probably came from that Chinese owner. Be a grown-up, don't say things that are stupid.
@deepg7084
@deepg7084 11 ай бұрын
It's a deal breaker for me.
@rwolfhaus1234
@rwolfhaus1234 4 ай бұрын
Think the bigger issue is that China is not a free country. Should avoid supporting (i.e. buying) from them whenever possible.
@BlackPantherStudios
@BlackPantherStudios 2 жыл бұрын
South Africa aviation would be a wonderful sight to see. Great video
@heaye
@heaye Жыл бұрын
Which have pressured cabin ?
@ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265
@ivanramiroalmaralesvargas5265 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice informations thank you!!!
@chutorosushi1925
@chutorosushi1925 2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful diamond aircraft and design.hope the prices and come down abit to let more people able to own this plane
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed! That would be amazing.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 2 жыл бұрын
Which 'plane' - five were mentioned
@ShinLeeChan
@ShinLeeChan Жыл бұрын
The DA62 isn't too costly if you think all the features it has. And it comes with 2 engines just in case. :) DA42 is the top for those who can't afford 1.2M+, it has also low maintenance and consumption.
@abhiyudaysrivastav3683
@abhiyudaysrivastav3683 Жыл бұрын
Very well done
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@debbies3763
@debbies3763 2 жыл бұрын
BEAUTYFUL AND THE RANGE IS GREAT 4 PASSANGER BUT A BIT UNDERPOWERED , LANCEAIR OR GLASAIR ARE FLYING AT 300MPH EVEN AN OLD MOONEY FLYS OVER 200MPH TRIPS IN THESE SMALL FIBERGLASS ROCKETS SHOULD QUICK.
@manuelpavoarce
@manuelpavoarce 6 ай бұрын
Me encanta , que aviones tan buenos, como me gustaría aprender con practica a pilotar uno de esos fantásticos aviones. El problema es económico. Además tendria que aprender empezando por lo mas fácil . como un párvulo. No la gramática. empezando con un simulador de vuelo. claro. ingles partiendo de cero. No empezando por la Gramática
@totosukatendel9209
@totosukatendel9209 2 жыл бұрын
Good idea if the figures mentioned , displayed in the screen.
@md.moinulislam9467
@md.moinulislam9467 2 жыл бұрын
Cool video.....
@albertvonschultz9137
@albertvonschultz9137 2 жыл бұрын
I have been thinking about buying the da40 and also the da62
@kresimirmilisa5560
@kresimirmilisa5560 2 жыл бұрын
model number 3 is good.
@cpe1704tks.
@cpe1704tks. 2 жыл бұрын
Question. What is the significance of naming it a "62?" What is the hidden connection?
@5CGQ
@5CGQ 2 жыл бұрын
6 seats, 2 engines.
@antoniog9814
@antoniog9814 2 жыл бұрын
@@5CGQ So the DA50 is 5 seats, 0 engines?
@5CGQ
@5CGQ 2 жыл бұрын
@@antoniog9814 Sounds about right.
@jay_b..
@jay_b.. 2 жыл бұрын
@@5CGQ Its got 7 seats and 2 engines. The model numbers do not correlate exactly. The zero means single engine and the 2 means twin engine. The first digit is the sequence in the range starting with 4. So DA40 is the start of the range and has a single engine and DA62 is the top of the range and has 2 engines.
@Boris_Chang
@Boris_Chang 2 жыл бұрын
If you add six to two, you can count that number of measures going backwards into Helter Skelter to hear John say: “I buried Paul again”.
@hungrysurfer9471
@hungrysurfer9471 Жыл бұрын
DA62 can have longer range tanks fitted.
@nasosnasos8054
@nasosnasos8054 2 жыл бұрын
Love love
@ezequielrussian392
@ezequielrussian392 2 жыл бұрын
Rating all models of diamond : I have worked on da 40 all the way to 62 and I got to say innovation wise they are there new technology they are there but in my opinion they are aircraft that are too expensive for what they offer . First no one bigger than 5'7 can sit comfortably in any model . Second , as far as durability and maintenance these planes have to be extensively inspected where no diamond service center has a good maintenance team that practices good maintenance that is why I left and I choose not to work these airframes. Third, still in maintenance the manuals are free but alot of the times are missing alot of information and you have to call diamond support. Also parts can't be stocked perhaps and or as an example as a shop to stock parts that usually break you have to order on a need basis I don't know if this has changed I hope so . Fourthly , based on these points I consider diamond aircraft too expensive with parts , planes as what they offer you can easily buy a twin turbo prop with that type price tag with a sacrifice of burning more fuel and being more comfortable .
@gq12o
@gq12o 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your insight. What would you purchase?
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation 2 жыл бұрын
That's absolutely great input. Thanks for sharing!
@renard8137
@renard8137 2 жыл бұрын
And to add: Diamond Aircraft Industries is owned by China; a partner off Russia. These aircrafts are manufactured in Austria, a country stating neutrality in the barbaric unlawful war against Ukrainian sovereignty.
@ezequielrussian392
@ezequielrussian392 2 жыл бұрын
@@gq12o it actually depends for what I need it for. aircraft are not the type of vehecles that if you cannot afford you must have . To me they require two simple things time and money . Having said that just on the safekeeping of picking an aircraft for purchase I would pick a beechcraft bonanza it is roomy for 4 people and luggage yes you burn more gas but you are more comfortable .
@themrjim1953
@themrjim1953 9 ай бұрын
where are the prices ????
@djehanprabowo2495
@djehanprabowo2495 2 жыл бұрын
12345 good diamond aircraft 👍😁
@drampadreg1386
@drampadreg1386 2 жыл бұрын
24 gallons of fuel for a plane doing 150 knots or so these days is not fuel efficient, 13 is. I've seen on 10 GPH@ 184 Kts as well, it was a Lancair.
@wesleyhall2719
@wesleyhall2719 2 жыл бұрын
I believe that was total fuel capacity
@dirkschwartz1689
@dirkschwartz1689 Жыл бұрын
@@wesleyhall2719 Indeed. They misleadingly say "uses up to" but they give the numbers for total max. fuel on board for each aircraft.
@nasosnasos8054
@nasosnasos8054 2 жыл бұрын
Price ?
@matthewbrinker6615
@matthewbrinker6615 2 жыл бұрын
My comment is for all of them. Too damn expensive and China holdings. Never going to get one now even if I ever get the money for one. I get afford aviation anymore.
@СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к
@СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@easternwoods4378
@easternwoods4378 2 жыл бұрын
Too bad Diamond was sold to the Chinese.
@pistaf618
@pistaf618 2 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@ackerkartoffel8627
@ackerkartoffel8627 Жыл бұрын
Well, china can still import the Russian emgine
@Karim-en9on
@Karim-en9on 2 жыл бұрын
Ok nice
@FelixSamulevich
@FelixSamulevich Жыл бұрын
One word is not mentioned if it have right for PARACHUTE implanted Last one if not to notice so taile have to be longer
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
If we understood your comment correctly, yes, the inclusion of a BRS is included in the aircraft certification. It adds an extra layer of reassurance during flights. Are there specific aircraft models with parachute systems that you find particularly interesting?
@FelixSamulevich
@FelixSamulevich Жыл бұрын
@@AviationFederation I believe so presentation of simulation of using of safe system in extreme situation cane be interesting for potential customer . Thank you for notice .
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
@@FelixSamulevich You're most welcome and we appreciate the comments! We're passionate about the topic of parachute systems as a standard feature of most small general aviation aircraft. For us, the safety record is very promising so far.
@emilioalvarez9059
@emilioalvarez9059 2 жыл бұрын
me encanta
@tdgdbs1
@tdgdbs1 Жыл бұрын
Fuel burn and fuel capacity are two different metrics.
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
You're absolutely right. Fuel burn and fuel capacity are indeed two distinct metrics when it comes to aircraft. Both metrics are important considerations for flight planning and operational efficiency.
@ditto1958
@ditto1958 Жыл бұрын
Composite = plastic?
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Not exactly. Depending on the manufacturer, it can be any combination of carbon fibre, polyethylene laminates, and sometimes with metal/alloy substructures.
@skylane1829
@skylane1829 2 жыл бұрын
Own by the Chinese?………you lost me
@katprowler6805
@katprowler6805 2 жыл бұрын
Y? are you a racist?
@jay_b..
@jay_b.. 2 жыл бұрын
Does it matter? Most things including iPads are built in China….
@pistaf618
@pistaf618 2 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@semiprofessional8470
@semiprofessional8470 2 жыл бұрын
They own or are buying everything
@renejr2296
@renejr2296 Жыл бұрын
Damn shame...this whole damn country and damn near every last citizen in it is up for Chinese purchase 🤦🏾‍♂️
@OMA254
@OMA254 2 жыл бұрын
Lots of inaccuracies! In the pictures and the facts.
@gurbinderkaur6548
@gurbinderkaur6548 Жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@julieredmon1521
@julieredmon1521 Жыл бұрын
How does anyone afford a million dollar plane? The payments would be more than my harley and house payments combined. Would love to have one but too rich for my blood.
@HappymanRH
@HappymanRH Жыл бұрын
😊
@satguy
@satguy 2 жыл бұрын
I was a fan until I found out it was Chinese owned.
@danblumel
@danblumel 2 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@satguy
@satguy 2 жыл бұрын
@@danblumel That explains the left-handed joystick.
@danblumel
@danblumel 2 жыл бұрын
@@satguy that was done years before a Chinese company bought Cirrus.
@satguy
@satguy 2 жыл бұрын
@@danblumel I just don't like side stick aircraft. Give me a center console type stick, dual wheel, or old school dual sticks.
@stanislawfaron7810
@stanislawfaron7810 2 жыл бұрын
👍
@degraham9198
@degraham9198 2 жыл бұрын
Reckon you could fly that on one engine if you had to? I guess it would vary with payload. No cheesecake for Deanna, boo hiss.
@billyhillk5726
@billyhillk5726 2 жыл бұрын
Made for short folks. Not being prejudiced here. They're just not practical for anyone over about 5'6/7".
@amgguy4319
@amgguy4319 Жыл бұрын
Gosh, the Austrians knew how to design. But it's now Chinese, and we should all do our best to avoid Chinese...
@gdotone1
@gdotone1 Жыл бұрын
it looks cramped. man! it is a great looking plane but it could be bigger.
@thesecret7330
@thesecret7330 Жыл бұрын
Chinese😢😮😮😮no please don't say that 😢😢😢😢
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
We understand; learning Diamond Aircraft is Chinese-owned can be surprising. Is there something specific about Diamond's history or planes that you're fond of?
@goldenaye3
@goldenaye3 2 жыл бұрын
They don't have toilets
@classicraceruk1337
@classicraceruk1337 2 жыл бұрын
Yea they do a small bag!!!
@foramericam1097
@foramericam1097 2 жыл бұрын
Pretty planes but not worth the price!! The ASTRO is crap underpowered overpriced! The 62 is well over a million and there is other planes that have better performance for less!!
@jay_b..
@jay_b.. 2 жыл бұрын
There are always planes with better performance… but are they more fuel efficient and run on plain cheap diesel?
@jhaymanmyles2226
@jhaymanmyles2226 2 жыл бұрын
Soon as I heard owned by a chinese holding group at the beginning of the video i stopped watching
@pistaf618
@pistaf618 2 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@wesleyhall2719
@wesleyhall2719 2 жыл бұрын
Mooney is Chinese owed too
@Okefenokee_Nole
@Okefenokee_Nole Жыл бұрын
10:10 $1.2 million is too much for only 192 knots. I need 225 knots at that price.
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Indeed, the price point of $1.2 million may not meet your expectations for the speed you desire. However, it's important to keep in mind that there are other factors to consider when purchasing an aircraft, such as range, comfort, and avionics. It may be worth exploring other options that better fit your speed requirements and budget.
@robertmacombo8767
@robertmacombo8767 Жыл бұрын
What a great shame, from austrian to chinese.
@AviationFederation
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Indeed, Diamond Aircraft's transition from being an Austrian company to having Chinese ownership is a significant change in the industry. Changes in ownership can bring both opportunities and challenges, and it's understandable that such transitions can evoke various sentiments among aviation enthusiasts. It remains to be seen how the transition to Chinese ownership will impact the future direction and offerings of Diamond Aircraft.
The Best & Safest Light Twin - The DA42
17:58
Dwaynes Aviation
Рет қаралды 50 М.
FLYING HOME! / DA62 Atlantic Ferry Flight
15:36
Micke Lang (Micke Lang)
Рет қаралды 262 М.
Правильный подход к детям
00:18
Beatrise
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Мясо вегана? 🧐 @Whatthefshow
01:01
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
So Cute 🥰 who is better?
00:15
dednahype
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Diamond DA-50 RG VS Pipistrel Panthera | Price and Specs
14:59
JetStream
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
Top 5 Piper Aircraft Comparison 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
10:31
Aviation Federation
Рет қаралды 84 М.
Why Diamond DA62 is the Best Light Twin Aircraft
13:04
Dwaynes Aviation
Рет қаралды 318 М.
20 SMALLEST MINI AIRCRAFT IN THE WORLD
14:21
Tech Gear
Рет қаралды 313 М.
“The Black Knight”: Diamond DA50 RG North American Aircraft Launch
6:29
DiamondAircraftInd
Рет қаралды 568 М.
The Panthera is FAST, Efficient, and BEAUTIFUL - Flight Demo
16:29
FloridaFlying
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Правильный подход к детям
00:18
Beatrise
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН