*How would you rate each of these 5 aircraft models from Diamond Aircraft? What other features are you looking for in a small plane? Let us know what you think! To see more exciting aircraft videos, check these out:* Top 5 Cheapest Twin-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2HPYZypg7p0kLM Top 5 Single-Engine Piston Airplanes Around $500K kzbin.info/www/bejne/l4GZlWljjLCBn6c&t Top 3 Cirrus Aircraft Price Comparison 2022-2023 2022-2023 | New Features kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6SseqSfmbVsa9E
@albertattwood8746Күн бұрын
If They gave the DA50 rg the same range and flight ceiling as the DA 62 they would have a Winner in a single engine aircraft.
@josh8852 жыл бұрын
Diamond really needs a model above the DA62 with the DA50RG engines so it can hit at least 200kts and ideally a pressurized cabin.
@moviefalk1772 жыл бұрын
So true
@_purge9488 Жыл бұрын
Yea the 20K ceiling made me laugh knowing that it’s depressurized lol
@petkuscinta979710 ай бұрын
I was just wondering if CD300 Turbo is superior to other non-Continental engines. I really like the DA50 RG but are two Aestro motors safer than one CD300?
@albertattwood8746Күн бұрын
Yes they need to punch a lot higher, range, speed, flight ceiling and a 5 bladed prop. Not to mention pressurised cockpit.
2 жыл бұрын
Estes aviões da Diamond me fascinam! Já ouvi pilotos experientes dizerem, que os bimotores desta marca são superlativamente eficientes, econômicos e seguros. Só me falta a grana pra adquirir um destes! Um da linha dos monomotores já seria um luxo sem tamanho pra mim. Sonhar não paga imposto né! ☺️
@huto96062 жыл бұрын
Für mich das beste Flugzeug in dieser Klasse. Das Unternehmen ist langsam von Jahr zu Jahr gewachsten. Alle gewonnen Erkenntnisse wurden in der nächsten Generation von Flugzeugen berücksichtigt. Nur so ist ein Erfolg und eine Weiterentwicklung möglich. Das stetig wachsende bring dich zu einer guten Ernte.
@richardgripe58882 жыл бұрын
Looking for 300hp. per side and 200kt cruise, maybe pressurized
@ShinLeeChan Жыл бұрын
Loved these aircrafts till Chinese became the owner! They still need more power 'cause engines are underpower but safe.
@sosochio4374 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese owner produces millions of vehicle wheels and rims annually and is the OEM for many automakers worldwide. I would suggest you throw your car's wheels away if you really don't like the Chinese owner and maybe throw your wife's car's wheels or even your parents' because those wheels probably came from that Chinese owner. Be a grown-up, don't say things that are stupid.
@deepg708411 ай бұрын
It's a deal breaker for me.
@rwolfhaus12344 ай бұрын
Think the bigger issue is that China is not a free country. Should avoid supporting (i.e. buying) from them whenever possible.
@BlackPantherStudios2 жыл бұрын
South Africa aviation would be a wonderful sight to see. Great video
@heaye Жыл бұрын
Which have pressured cabin ?
@ivanramiroalmaralesvargas52652 жыл бұрын
Very nice informations thank you!!!
@chutorosushi19252 жыл бұрын
Beautiful diamond aircraft and design.hope the prices and come down abit to let more people able to own this plane
@AviationFederation2 жыл бұрын
Indeed! That would be amazing.
@Tinker19502 жыл бұрын
Which 'plane' - five were mentioned
@ShinLeeChan Жыл бұрын
The DA62 isn't too costly if you think all the features it has. And it comes with 2 engines just in case. :) DA42 is the top for those who can't afford 1.2M+, it has also low maintenance and consumption.
@abhiyudaysrivastav3683 Жыл бұрын
Very well done
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@debbies37632 жыл бұрын
BEAUTYFUL AND THE RANGE IS GREAT 4 PASSANGER BUT A BIT UNDERPOWERED , LANCEAIR OR GLASAIR ARE FLYING AT 300MPH EVEN AN OLD MOONEY FLYS OVER 200MPH TRIPS IN THESE SMALL FIBERGLASS ROCKETS SHOULD QUICK.
@manuelpavoarce6 ай бұрын
Me encanta , que aviones tan buenos, como me gustaría aprender con practica a pilotar uno de esos fantásticos aviones. El problema es económico. Además tendria que aprender empezando por lo mas fácil . como un párvulo. No la gramática. empezando con un simulador de vuelo. claro. ingles partiendo de cero. No empezando por la Gramática
@totosukatendel92092 жыл бұрын
Good idea if the figures mentioned , displayed in the screen.
@md.moinulislam94672 жыл бұрын
Cool video.....
@albertvonschultz91372 жыл бұрын
I have been thinking about buying the da40 and also the da62
@kresimirmilisa55602 жыл бұрын
model number 3 is good.
@cpe1704tks.2 жыл бұрын
Question. What is the significance of naming it a "62?" What is the hidden connection?
@5CGQ2 жыл бұрын
6 seats, 2 engines.
@antoniog98142 жыл бұрын
@@5CGQ So the DA50 is 5 seats, 0 engines?
@5CGQ2 жыл бұрын
@@antoniog9814 Sounds about right.
@jay_b..2 жыл бұрын
@@5CGQ Its got 7 seats and 2 engines. The model numbers do not correlate exactly. The zero means single engine and the 2 means twin engine. The first digit is the sequence in the range starting with 4. So DA40 is the start of the range and has a single engine and DA62 is the top of the range and has 2 engines.
@Boris_Chang2 жыл бұрын
If you add six to two, you can count that number of measures going backwards into Helter Skelter to hear John say: “I buried Paul again”.
@hungrysurfer9471 Жыл бұрын
DA62 can have longer range tanks fitted.
@nasosnasos80542 жыл бұрын
Love love
@ezequielrussian3922 жыл бұрын
Rating all models of diamond : I have worked on da 40 all the way to 62 and I got to say innovation wise they are there new technology they are there but in my opinion they are aircraft that are too expensive for what they offer . First no one bigger than 5'7 can sit comfortably in any model . Second , as far as durability and maintenance these planes have to be extensively inspected where no diamond service center has a good maintenance team that practices good maintenance that is why I left and I choose not to work these airframes. Third, still in maintenance the manuals are free but alot of the times are missing alot of information and you have to call diamond support. Also parts can't be stocked perhaps and or as an example as a shop to stock parts that usually break you have to order on a need basis I don't know if this has changed I hope so . Fourthly , based on these points I consider diamond aircraft too expensive with parts , planes as what they offer you can easily buy a twin turbo prop with that type price tag with a sacrifice of burning more fuel and being more comfortable .
@gq12o2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your insight. What would you purchase?
@AviationFederation2 жыл бұрын
That's absolutely great input. Thanks for sharing!
@renard81372 жыл бұрын
And to add: Diamond Aircraft Industries is owned by China; a partner off Russia. These aircrafts are manufactured in Austria, a country stating neutrality in the barbaric unlawful war against Ukrainian sovereignty.
@ezequielrussian3922 жыл бұрын
@@gq12o it actually depends for what I need it for. aircraft are not the type of vehecles that if you cannot afford you must have . To me they require two simple things time and money . Having said that just on the safekeeping of picking an aircraft for purchase I would pick a beechcraft bonanza it is roomy for 4 people and luggage yes you burn more gas but you are more comfortable .
@themrjim19539 ай бұрын
where are the prices ????
@djehanprabowo24952 жыл бұрын
12345 good diamond aircraft 👍😁
@drampadreg13862 жыл бұрын
24 gallons of fuel for a plane doing 150 knots or so these days is not fuel efficient, 13 is. I've seen on 10 GPH@ 184 Kts as well, it was a Lancair.
@wesleyhall27192 жыл бұрын
I believe that was total fuel capacity
@dirkschwartz1689 Жыл бұрын
@@wesleyhall2719 Indeed. They misleadingly say "uses up to" but they give the numbers for total max. fuel on board for each aircraft.
@nasosnasos80542 жыл бұрын
Price ?
@matthewbrinker66152 жыл бұрын
My comment is for all of them. Too damn expensive and China holdings. Never going to get one now even if I ever get the money for one. I get afford aviation anymore.
@СулиманАбдулхаджиев-ш4к Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@easternwoods43782 жыл бұрын
Too bad Diamond was sold to the Chinese.
@pistaf6182 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@ackerkartoffel8627 Жыл бұрын
Well, china can still import the Russian emgine
@Karim-en9on2 жыл бұрын
Ok nice
@FelixSamulevich Жыл бұрын
One word is not mentioned if it have right for PARACHUTE implanted Last one if not to notice so taile have to be longer
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
If we understood your comment correctly, yes, the inclusion of a BRS is included in the aircraft certification. It adds an extra layer of reassurance during flights. Are there specific aircraft models with parachute systems that you find particularly interesting?
@FelixSamulevich Жыл бұрын
@@AviationFederation I believe so presentation of simulation of using of safe system in extreme situation cane be interesting for potential customer . Thank you for notice .
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
@@FelixSamulevich You're most welcome and we appreciate the comments! We're passionate about the topic of parachute systems as a standard feature of most small general aviation aircraft. For us, the safety record is very promising so far.
@emilioalvarez90592 жыл бұрын
me encanta
@tdgdbs1 Жыл бұрын
Fuel burn and fuel capacity are two different metrics.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
You're absolutely right. Fuel burn and fuel capacity are indeed two distinct metrics when it comes to aircraft. Both metrics are important considerations for flight planning and operational efficiency.
@ditto1958 Жыл бұрын
Composite = plastic?
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Not exactly. Depending on the manufacturer, it can be any combination of carbon fibre, polyethylene laminates, and sometimes with metal/alloy substructures.
@skylane18292 жыл бұрын
Own by the Chinese?………you lost me
@katprowler68052 жыл бұрын
Y? are you a racist?
@jay_b..2 жыл бұрын
Does it matter? Most things including iPads are built in China….
@pistaf6182 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@semiprofessional84702 жыл бұрын
They own or are buying everything
@renejr2296 Жыл бұрын
Damn shame...this whole damn country and damn near every last citizen in it is up for Chinese purchase 🤦🏾♂️
@OMA2542 жыл бұрын
Lots of inaccuracies! In the pictures and the facts.
@gurbinderkaur6548 Жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@julieredmon1521 Жыл бұрын
How does anyone afford a million dollar plane? The payments would be more than my harley and house payments combined. Would love to have one but too rich for my blood.
@HappymanRH Жыл бұрын
😊
@satguy2 жыл бұрын
I was a fan until I found out it was Chinese owned.
@danblumel2 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@satguy2 жыл бұрын
@@danblumel That explains the left-handed joystick.
@danblumel2 жыл бұрын
@@satguy that was done years before a Chinese company bought Cirrus.
@satguy2 жыл бұрын
@@danblumel I just don't like side stick aircraft. Give me a center console type stick, dual wheel, or old school dual sticks.
@stanislawfaron78102 жыл бұрын
👍
@degraham91982 жыл бұрын
Reckon you could fly that on one engine if you had to? I guess it would vary with payload. No cheesecake for Deanna, boo hiss.
@billyhillk57262 жыл бұрын
Made for short folks. Not being prejudiced here. They're just not practical for anyone over about 5'6/7".
@amgguy4319 Жыл бұрын
Gosh, the Austrians knew how to design. But it's now Chinese, and we should all do our best to avoid Chinese...
@gdotone1 Жыл бұрын
it looks cramped. man! it is a great looking plane but it could be bigger.
@thesecret7330 Жыл бұрын
Chinese😢😮😮😮no please don't say that 😢😢😢😢
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
We understand; learning Diamond Aircraft is Chinese-owned can be surprising. Is there something specific about Diamond's history or planes that you're fond of?
@goldenaye32 жыл бұрын
They don't have toilets
@classicraceruk13372 жыл бұрын
Yea they do a small bag!!!
@foramericam10972 жыл бұрын
Pretty planes but not worth the price!! The ASTRO is crap underpowered overpriced! The 62 is well over a million and there is other planes that have better performance for less!!
@jay_b..2 жыл бұрын
There are always planes with better performance… but are they more fuel efficient and run on plain cheap diesel?
@jhaymanmyles22262 жыл бұрын
Soon as I heard owned by a chinese holding group at the beginning of the video i stopped watching
@pistaf6182 жыл бұрын
Cirrus is also Chinese owned.
@wesleyhall27192 жыл бұрын
Mooney is Chinese owed too
@Okefenokee_Nole Жыл бұрын
10:10 $1.2 million is too much for only 192 knots. I need 225 knots at that price.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Indeed, the price point of $1.2 million may not meet your expectations for the speed you desire. However, it's important to keep in mind that there are other factors to consider when purchasing an aircraft, such as range, comfort, and avionics. It may be worth exploring other options that better fit your speed requirements and budget.
@robertmacombo8767 Жыл бұрын
What a great shame, from austrian to chinese.
@AviationFederation Жыл бұрын
Indeed, Diamond Aircraft's transition from being an Austrian company to having Chinese ownership is a significant change in the industry. Changes in ownership can bring both opportunities and challenges, and it's understandable that such transitions can evoke various sentiments among aviation enthusiasts. It remains to be seen how the transition to Chinese ownership will impact the future direction and offerings of Diamond Aircraft.