Traditional Anglican Mass - Demonstrated Ceremonial (No Commentary)

Рет қаралды 7,874

Fr Timothy Matkin - St Francis Dallas

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 51

@juanpena7436 6 күн бұрын

Old catholic priest here i absolutely love the beauty of this mass. God bless you Father

@VanusGalerion 5 ай бұрын

It's like roman latin mass but reformed and in english. Very beautiful. I am a lutheran myself and I admire liturgical beauty and traditions. God bless! I wish that every service, both in anglican and lutheran churches, would look like that.

@erc9468 3 ай бұрын

I wonder why you refer to is as "reformed". It doesn't seem to have anything that is distinctively reformed in character.

@VanusGalerion 3 ай бұрын

@@erc9468 I'm not a theologian but I think it might somehow differ doctrinaly from the roman latin mass. That's what I meant by saying that this liturgy is 'reformed'.

@himlogicc 5 сағат бұрын

There’s the ordinariate who is exactly like this church but it’s Catholic

@anselman3156 Жыл бұрын

Lovely presentation. I loved my time as a server in traditional Anglican churches, including an English Missal one, and another with a full High Mass using a modification of the Scottish Liturgy. I appreciate your channel. Best wishes from Scotland.

@FrAndrewHarrah 4 ай бұрын

Thank you for this, Father. God bless your ministry.

@mafakefoot Жыл бұрын

There is no "was" (Thanks be to God!) A resounding "IS"...every day. We add lotsa servers, vestments, linens, incense, choirs and organ for High Masses and Solemn High Masses! Our Sacrifice from which Blessings flow

@ericsteele6941 6 ай бұрын

I'm not sure how this is traditional Anglicanism. Traditional Anglicanism would be a Priest vested in Cassock, Surplice, and Cope, celebrating from the north end, and reading the 1662 BCP service.

@sameash3153 6 ай бұрын

Low Church Anglicanism was a postreformation aberration that thrived only a good 200 years. This is way older and more glorious.

@pipsheppard6747 5 ай бұрын

In the US, we can’t use the 1662. The king is not prayed for.

@sameash3153 5 ай бұрын

@pipsheppard6747 Yes you can. You just change "save the king" to "save the state" and then omit the prayers for royal family. But also nobody is gonna come in and stop you if you pray for them anyway

@pipsheppard6747 5 ай бұрын

@@sameash3153 I love the 1662, a beautiful liturgy. However, if the CoE, after the Revolution, had been so kind as to consecrate bishops for the US, then Seabury would not have had to run off to Scotland for such, having then to agree with the modification of the liturgy.

@soulbysoul2479 2 ай бұрын

@@pipsheppard6747 Still, there’s nothing 18th century about this ceremony. Even with the Scottish Communion, the service was conducted in surplice and black scarf, and at the northside (or “right side” as the 1892 has it) of the Table. I have an Anglo-Catholic background, but when this is called a “traditional” Anglican service, with no caveats, they’re trying to erase the history of the church.

@britanniacountryball.8557 20 күн бұрын

Cual es el nombre de la melodía con órgano al principio?

@archbishopnicholasacresocr429 3 ай бұрын

Great rector

@brodereck1 5 ай бұрын

Perfection.

@nyssian7264 Жыл бұрын

More Catholic than most Romans!

@JustinBrown-wc1ph 6 ай бұрын

As a catholic I find it beautiful and agree that we have a lot of modernized novus ordos, but we also have many traditional masses and churches.

@DoctorDewgong 5 ай бұрын

Having traditional aesthetics doesn't make something Catholic. Anglican liturgy is schismatic as best, heretical at worst, and always illicit

@pipsheppard6747 5 ай бұрын

@@DoctorDewgonghahaha!!! … wrong.

@emmanuelsantanna204 2 ай бұрын

@@DoctorDewgong And invalid.

@DoctorDewgong 2 ай бұрын

@@emmanuelsantanna204 it can be valid on rare occasions. Some Anglican priests do actually have valid orders, so their Mass would be valid but illicit

@JayEhm1517 Жыл бұрын

When was this liturgy and all his trappings the standard practice within Anglicanism?

@scripturetraditionandreaso1132 Жыл бұрын

Before and after reformation.

@scripturetraditionandreaso1132 5 ай бұрын

Sarum Rite, don't you know that it's English? This liturgy developed mostly from the Sarum Rite therefore it's before Reformation on that basis.

@davidmorrison2739 5 ай бұрын

@@scripturetraditionandreaso1132 Pre-Reformation was Roman Catholic.

@rurikau 5 ай бұрын

It has never been the standard practice within Anglicanism. It is an accepted practice

@davidmorrison2739 2 ай бұрын

Never.

@sandramacfie8011 5 ай бұрын

Traditional Anglicans use the 1928 BCP, some of whose versicles and responses taken from the Psalms go back to the earliest celebrations of the Christian Community. This doesn't even touch the antiquity of many of the Collects and prayers. See Shepherd's commentary for proof.

@albertito77 4 ай бұрын

apart from the eucharistic prayer this is word for word identical to the Ordinariate Liturgy

@Lumen_Patriarcharum 3 ай бұрын

Not exactly. The prayers at the foot of the altar have slightly different wording as well as other prayers, the Kyrie is tripled, the introduction to the Gospel is different, and the propers may be different. The "Cannon Missae" also has a lot of the traditional gestures, and it seems like a rewording of the actual Roman Cannon.

@mafakefoot Жыл бұрын

"IS" still never a "WAS" in my parish my 60 years and counting

@JamesDeal-oe5sv 7 ай бұрын

What year Prayer Book was this liturgy taken from?

@ethandempsey9974 6 ай бұрын

2019 book in traditional language

@davidmorrison2739 5 ай бұрын

Among other things- Anglican services don't have deliberately inaudible prayers by the priest/presbyter. True Anglicans don't worship the elements.

@TimothyMatkin 2 ай бұрын

If they're inaudible, how do you know?

@davidmorrison2739 2 ай бұрын

@@TimothyMatkin I know they are inaudible because I couldn't hear them. My second sentence was based on the way the celebrant bows before the bread and wine, elevates the bread with bells ringing, using the sign of the cross over the elements and so on on. My main objection to all this is that use of the word "Anglican". True Anglicans do not regard the eucharist as a sacrifice nor do we believe in the real presence. We have communion tables, not altars.

@briandelaney9710 Жыл бұрын

Cranmer would turn in his grave (and that’s a good thing !!!)

@sameash3153 6 ай бұрын

Based

@MegaDePorter Ай бұрын

Yes, beautiful. But really traditional. The rite of Sarum would be more "traditional". There exist about 30+ rites (including the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox). Each serves a purpose for a local church. The important matter is the Eucharist, not the form or rubrics. Don't get caught up with form over substance.