2024 Ford Ranger In-Depth First Drive: Towing, Trims, Payload, Price & More!

🔒Remove your personal information from the web at JoinDeleteMe.com/TK20 and use code TK20 for 20% off 🙌
DeleteMe international Plans: international....
In this video we explore the brand new 2024 Ford Ranger for North America. This new midsize truck has lots of new features and a fresh style.
What do you think of the new Ranger? Let us know your thoughts on this Ford in the comments below.
We have a second channel! Find it here - ‪@tkpowersports‬
Visit our website here - canadiantruckk...
Become a Truck King member - / @truckking
Buy our merch here - / @truckking
Follow us on Twitter - / truckkingchalng
Check out Steve's music channel - / @selmervidz1
#Ford #Ranger #trucks

[@aroundthegroundlandscaping7107]

Wish they would’ve given us a king cab option like frontier and Toyota not everyone needs a crew cab and certainly not a 5’ bed some people want at least a 6’ bed

[@1kukini]

I agree, just a little space behind the seats for a couple of suitcases is plenty.

[@stog9821]

@@1kukini and a bench seat with column shift so that if you had to get a third (smallish) person in a crunch you could do so.

[@brentvance3958]

They are selling what sold the most. Over 75% were sold that way so it makes sense to do that.

[@Dusdaddy]

Agreed. They have payload and towing and seats and other features for work but forgot the 6ft bed? They seem confused on who they are selling to. Daily driver/recreational truck=GM & Toyota. Work orientated=Nissan & Toyota 6ft. beds but the nod to the Nissan with the simpler engine.

[@eddiehaskell5578]

Your exactly right. As a tradesman,I opted for the frontier because I need 6’ bed. The last thing I need is a backseat which I find totally ridiculous.

[@jacketprideable]

We, the consumer, have to stop buying vehicles at these ridiculous prices!!! They keep going up in price because we keep giving them money. They’re laughing all the way to the bank.

[@RockCh4lk]

I like how we call mid-size trucks "little trucks." I pull up to an older Chevy 1500, or Ford F150 in my 2022 Frontier, and they're basically the same size. People be commuting to their office jobs and the grocery store in massive heavy duty trucks nowadays.

[@dank9288639]

haha Ikr, It's crazy! I was thinking the same thing about the size. I had a 2003 silverado, and I got into the Colorado zr2, and it felt like the same size 😂

[@Lalaafastroli]

Dude you’re telling me?!? I use my Mazda 3 hatchback more for the outdoors the 99.8% off pickup truck owners driving these absolutely massive trucks. Tbh it’s a little embarrassing as my first truck was my grandfathers 98 little ranger.

[@AK_Ray]

There's still a pretty noticable difference between the two separated by 23 years. 2000 f150 Track width- 65" Height- 75" Overall length *max- 244" 2023 ranger Track width- 61" Height- 71" Overall length- 210"

[@sitrep1776]

@@AK_Rayhey man you’re not supposed to bring up dimensions and specs dude! Just say the trucks big!

[@EC_ATV_Outdoors]

I think society needs to get away from the throwaway and upgrade regularly mindset. A carryover engine is not a big deal. I'd rather have them support an engine for 20 years making small improvements over time, only making reliability better. (King quad, brute force, grizzly 🤔) Sadly people think old is boring and bad. And I get it, they want to make people want new. But the industry has a normal cycle. Rich get new every 2/3 years, middle gets mildly used and own for 5+ years. Poor pick up what works. And the whole income span gets something.

[@MuahMan]

It's 100% about making EPA and other government regulations.

[@ludovicaugustave7185]

The Ranger is now a baby F-150. GM and Food are 2 strong choices in the midsize segment. Great review Steeve 🎉🎉🎉.

[@jasonme3557]

Now I am hungry

[@TheAntinowherelane]

That 2.7 in the Ranger will turn that thing into an absolute rocket. Crazy power to weight.

[@All-Miles-Matter]

Yeah well they also are putting a 3.0 twin turbo in it

[@thejavierpa]

@@All-Miles-Matterbut that’s with the raptor edition though 2.7 as a choice then a basic tune with that engine it’s going to be overpowered

[@All-Miles-Matter]

@@thejavierpa awesome!

[@ghilliemanreviews]

@@All-Miles-Matterthe 3.0 though hasn’t been as reliable. The 2.7 is an awesome engine. It should be the standard engine for the Ranger IMO

[@rightwingsafetysquad9872]

Ranger is getting capable enough that they should put a 75” bed on it and call it an F-100.

[@robertopics]

And it becomes the f150 super cab and about the same price minus the room 😂.

[@rightwingsafetysquad9872]

@@robertopics It might not make sense to you, but some of us prefer the driving characteristic of the mid-size segment.

[@pauls477]

@@robertopics In Canada my fully loaded Ranger is $55 000 all in - my friends fully loaded f150 was $81000 - so not even close in price

[@timothyriley8995]

Love the rear locker availability and wider bed. My biggest gripe is the solid rear bench. I love the split back seats on my taco.

[@db3837]

I can't believe the new ranger doesn't have rear vents. Crazy!! Fire the accountant who told the engineers to remove them.

[@modmatt1]

100%. I'd also like to see a split rear seat bottom so you can have a passenger and use of the floor space next to them. We often use our F-150 this way.

[@HiPlains1]

I'll admit the Ranger is the most capable mid size. After seeing Toyota's latest effort this is best in class. I owned a 2014 Ranger overseas and really liked it. Its not so cramped inside like most mid sizes. It the goldy locks of mid size trucks.

[@timothyriley8995]

Love the new ranger, but I wish they would've offered the Bronco's 7 speed manual

[@RobertNuno]

I would drive manuals in the 90's because they were far superior to the autos of the time. But now, I don't see the point of a manual. The Autos have better fuel economy and usually have some sort of selecting a gear. They are also programmed great. I see these comments and don't understand why anyone would ask for this on a modern truck. Manufacturers are not going to add them if it makes up 10% of sales.

[@ko4otv43]

I wished they'd put them in the f150s too. I'd much rather replace a clutch over a transmission any day..

[@22addict40]

Isn’t Toyota offering a 6 speed in the 24?taco? I prefer manual myself. You can put it in the right gear instead of a sluggish slow automatic when you really need it for the fellow saying no need for manuals in new modern trucks, boy people talk before they think…lol

[@RobertNuno]

Modern Automatics are not sluggish. In fact, you cannot shift as fast as a modern auto. It is just not worth it any more.

[@truthserum5310]

No thanks. I love my weekend Sports cars to be manual, but not my DD truck.

[@omarmartinez912]

Thanks TruckKing! I really enjoyed the video and I love the truck. I personally would go with a 2.7 V6 in the XLT trim with the FX4 package. I cant wait to see your off road videos in this.

[@ChopperChad]

Be cool if the shifter was on the column to free up that space on the console for cubby storage. My 17 F150 has a column shifter and I much prefer it.

[@truthserum5310]

NOOOOOO!!!! I HATE column shifters. Only bare bones vinyl seat and floored work trucks have column shifters.

[@joshdoddadbod]

Yea I have no idea why everyone got rid of them, they are so functional.

[@Dusdaddy]

Congrats! This is one of the best reviews I've watched yet. You covered more pertinent info than many of the other reviews including TFL, (sorry Andre).

[@Clockwork0nions]

Primary issue is it’s still too damn expensive. The XL STX trim shown as the “base” Ranger is the same price as a Nissan Frontier Pro 4X. Sure the Ranger may have more tech, but I don’t want a tech laden truck, especially with how crappy Ford’s quality has been since Farley took over. If I really wanted a Ford in that price range the XL F-150 is the same price, but comes with the 5.0 V8!

[@kenyongillespie8652]

I like the new look and glad it has a little more room in the back seat. I wished they would offer two tone colors on the exterior.

[@dangerfield85]

Too damn expensive still. Great review, the base model looks fully featured.

[@mabelpup8502]

Ford said they’re listening to their customers and still put a 100/0 rear seat…..

[@andrem5843]

Will they come out with a Tremor trim? If they do, I’ll get it with the 2.7 ecoboost.

[@Alexander-fr1kk]

You get a ruler on the tailgate?!!! Well I was on the fence, but not anymore 🤣🤣🤣

[@n.elliott9122]

Would love to see that generation of ranger with the 5.0 coyote motor as a factory option. Since you know that somebody will offer a swap over implant kit for it eventually and I think it would be right at home in that little truck.

[@chuckgrenci6404]

The 'mids' are getting bigger and bigger; and that's too bad in my opinion.

[@yankeesusa1]

It's only 2 inches bigger on the side lol. And the ranger is still smaller than the canyon. Also, for those that use it for work you can now put a whole sheet of plywood inside.

[@dawsongranger4940]

I think you should look at this ranger as just a truck rather than a midsize. It’s got great towing, payload, and practicality while not being gargantuan. I think the ranger makes way more sense than an f150, if you want smaller you can get a maverick. It is too bad the true small trucks aren’t here anymore but I like this ranger as just a truck

[@jamesjannell8706]

I'm really liking what ford did with this new truck for the money.

[@TropicMD]

Trying to purchase a Ranger Raptor; dealership told me that it will take months to get the color I want! Pathetic that ford rolls out a model that they cannot even manufacture in a timely manner.

[@Chris-ut6eq]

Getting more for less? So this truck is less than last year's model? Or is it like the F-150, paying more for features that were added to lower trim levels?

[@davefisher5196]

I was seriously thinking about getting one but then I found out that they do not have Auto 4wd like my Colorado. Just 2wd n 4wd hi n lo Wet asphalt is super slick plus driving on patchy ice n snow

[@GYPSY400]

The True 4wd system is actually better. Auto 4wd has a clutch in the transfer case that can fail. Also, the oil for an Auto transfer case is crazy expensive.

[@davefisher5196]

@@GYPSY400 but on on patchy slick roads where you cannot run true 4wd as you will tear up diffs u-joints and transfer cases. The Colorado and Canyons transfer case which has 4wd-auto 4hi and 4lo takes 2 quarts of sexton vi. $7 a quart

[@bryanwolfe9350]

I love this truck. However I would not tow a 5,000lb camper, 3,500 max

[@lanceripplinger8352]

I like that base model. They seem to give you a lot of features. I'm curious how much of a difference there is between the LED reflectors on the base model there, and the LED projectors on the Lariat.

[@burkepete110]

you should never be at MAX towing

[@max_archer]

Those grey panels from the sport appearance package do wonders for the front end, it just doesn't look right to me with one color over the whole front. I wish it still had a real steel front bumper like the previous one, though, the ones on my previous gen have saved my truck not once but twice when people hit my parked truck. I'll be interested to drive one of these new ones and see how the ride compares to my 2020 on Blistein 5100s, which were a huge upgrade and transformed the truck IMO, especially for towing. One thing that bugs me is seeing that those huge running boards are stock on the FX4. Even with a bit of front lift from the Bilsteins and slightly oversized tires, nobody's ever had an issue getting into my truck, not even my 5'7" 77 year old dad or a 5'1" female friend who's been in my truck a bunch, and those steps are just gonna get in the way off road.

[@bowdoin5063]

I'd buy one if they were reasonably priced

[@billygames7107]

i dream of the day i buy this truck with thhe 2.7... Im saving and waiting... HURRY UP FORD!!

[@danieljohnson4418]

With Ford's recent quality wors, I trust this truck will be a first-year nightmare.

[@Ichibuns]

XL trim all the way. I'm definitely a fan of the vinyl floor, standard features, and rear legroom of the new Ranger. My family wouldn't need any more than that.

[@patmason7276]

Love the new Ranger but it's hard to step down out of my F150 lariat especially fuel mileage.

[@championhairpuller]

Love your style of presentation, Steve! Very natural and easy to listen to.

[@kennordsfan1494]

Are you sure there is an actual trailer brake this time lol 😂. You know the last ranger never had one right? Even though you had said it did right?

[@farmerricho]

Nice. I pickup my 2024 Ford Ranger XLT, 3 litre V6, 4 wheel drive in acouple weeks. Rangers in Australia have a different design. Free tub liner, side step on the tub. Keyless start. Towbar, Side steps. Rubber floor mats. 360 lights and camera.

[@sanguinecavalier4153]

40k for a base package truck is insane

[@hynsum]

Agreed

[@Antwan.Frazier]

Facts

[@garys596]

52k for a ranger is insane. No way

[@eligains610]

Not that it should cost this. But when am equilavent f-150 to that lariat Ranger is 75kish it kinda makes sense. It’s all priced 10-15k too high. But price wise it lives up.

[@randysavage8963]

Great review Steve.

[@normcheers1726]

Lot's of bean counter cost cutting, no rear vents or 3 zone temp control, cheap bench rear seat with no split for storage with a passenger, would be a perfect platform for the flat floor and split fold like an f150, the off the shelf tailgate assist, some cheap looking plastics on the interior especially the center console area and knobs, no convex mirror because you can't have it with bliss? Just not as nice as I had hoped for, especially for over 50k on the lariat.

[@jd4edc]

Loving the refresh design and simplification of offerings. I think it is a fanatic change all the way around.

[@kennak476]

If I were to trade up to the new Ranger my pick would be the XLT model, with the new 2.7 V6, tow package, FX4 package, and heated seats, block heater. Living in a northern state these are essentials IMO.

[@geezusmeatball1328]

I like my 23 canyon elevation in and out compare to that ranger , maybe in 5 yrs ranger will be more attractive for me

[@Alexander-fr1kk]

I hate the vertical screen 😬😬😬

[@waldnerjr7447]

Nice ride!!

[@marcm8209]

Ford did the 1 thing it said it would never do. They gave up on the full size bumper and appeared to use plastic like others. Looks rather nice and looking forward to actually seeing them in person and especially the Raptor version with the bigger ECO boost !

[@alessandromatteo8365]

Bought one 9/9/24 and I ❤IT .. Still figuring out all the bells and whistles... Automatic dimmer on lights is nice ..lights are bright makes night driving better

[@seanjamesmacleod241]

Unless you like a smaller truck for maneuvering and what not, the F150 2.7L costs about the same for the same MPG. No, thank you.

[@zani.dibrani]

Work purchased a 2019 for me back when it for came out. I absolutely love everything about it.. BUT this new 2024 model took care of all the little tweeks it was missing. My truck now has 62k+ miles on the odometer and I NEVER once had a single issue with it and I drive this thing like I stole it, HARD. Their looking into this '24 model now for me, and I hope it's as reliable as my current '19 Ranger because I can vouch, this babynwas built on a Wednesday for sure! Haha👍

[@gs-pd5ox]

If the 2.3 is a mechanical carry-over, does the tuner from ford still work on it? 2.3 with 310/370 vs a 2.7 with 325/400 seems like a marginal improvement.

[@wiks101]

My Ridgeline has a payload capacity of 1,509 pounds; so not all midsize are that weak- Not a fan of any 4cyl turbo for a $60K truck!

[@marklihsu]

$60k usd? You must be confusing Tacoma pricing with ranger pricing. This is $40k

[@wiks101]

@@marklihsu did you watch the video he showed the pricing for this truck, next time read before you open your mouth

[@freedomisntfree_44]

@@wiks101literally 39k for that blue one. Maybe you should watch the video yourself guy

[@wiks101]

@@freedomisntfree_44kzbin.info/www/bejne/e6utqah_Z5efa9U

[@wiks101]

@@marklihsukzbin.info/www/bejne/e6utqah_Z5efa9U

[@stevecreason]

The instrument cluster For the XLT is awful! it looks like a phone app. It just looks just cheap! it's a deal breaker for me!

[@jenniferalves152]

I’ve watched quite a few reviews on the new Ranger and yours is by far the best. Thank you.

[@stackchn]

Why aren't any KZbinrs reviewing the '24 compact/midsized Ram truck?

[@ramrider1453]

I don’t think there out yet are they?

[@jasoncameron194]

Ram hasn’t built them yet

[@spartanj2957]

Over priced for what you get ,Ford can keep it ,i can aford anything just about ,but most prices are to high . Fot the same money i can get a very nice restored older truck And be way happier.

[@cymerus2]

The biggest drawback of this car is that it doesn't have the 4x4 Auto on any of the trims, which can be a massive headache up north during the in-between seasons.

[@teddonley9594]

My truck has auto and I've never used or even imagined what it would be good for. I'm glad you commented, and now I know

[@cymerus2]

​@@teddonley9594 I had the "pleasure" of finding out the hard way what it's for when I switched from an AWD car to a 4x4 truck without the Auto option, and almost ended up in a ditch when I turned left from a high traffic road to a side road with a decent snow cover. My previous car wouldn't even care in such conditions because it would engage all wheels instantly and the new one struggled to recover, because you obviously don't have time to enable 4x4 manually when trying to stay on the road lol. It is also a massive headache when you're parking a heavy truck in an area where there is a partial ice cover and it's a bit of an incline, because you need to turn 4x4 on and off depending on the surface and if your turning or not.

[@teddonley9594]

@cymerus2 we don't get a lot of snow but if it starts I just put mine in 4 hi but the roads are mostly gravel anyway lol

[@jeffreybrown530]

Well I guess if you don’t know how to drive that could seem like a set back

[@cymerus2]

@@jeffreybrown530 All you need is a bad day when you zone out or a moment of distraction, and you have a problem. We all mess up sometimes and 4x4 Auto helps quite a bit when the driving conditions change from location to location, which can surprise you. I personally know a few professional long haul drivers who ended up in problematic situations many times, Mr "master driver" ;)

[@RidersInBlack]

The base model has cruise control! Best payload in the mid size segment!! You can get a rear locker even in 2WD! The 2.3 ecoboost doesn't sound like a tractor engine! It tows 7500 Lbs! It has a good sized fuel tank! It has a damped tailgate in lower trim levels! ● Toyota Tacoma leaves the chat room...

[@66racer]

I'm very curious what the next gen Tremor will offer in North America. Considering prices of the XLT FX4 vs the Raptor, it has to be a $50k truck.

[@jeffreyajello6046]

Great review! Always enjoy your content.

[@bigdaddy3662]

You say wind, but it's really Mormon God

[@Thankyou_3]

Another Ecoboost garbage from Ford. Come on guys, whatever happened to naturally aspirated engines. At least put in your 4.0 V6 from the 90s Explorer.

[@rjdavis7503]

Best midsize truck on the marketplace is the Ranger!

[@combat_vet4438]

Base Truck... sheesh 40k is a base midsized truck price now? It does come with a lot standard, but don't kid yourself, you are paying for all of it, hence 40k. Don't show me vinyl floors and try to say it's low end with it's 10 inch an 8 inch screens a powerful turbo engine, trailer back up assist etc. etc... but hey, I guess it's what everyone is buying.. maybe we should just start calling them "how much money can we charge and get away with truck" and all the brands are doing it now, not just picking on Ford.

[@plmn93]

Other than the screens and LED lights this thing looks like it could be 5-10 years old. Ford is even more conservative these days than Toyota was in the '90s. There's nothing about this truck that gets me excited. It would be like buying an appliance.

[@billygames7107]

You said “it’s gonna be crazy”about reviewing the 2.7… that was over 3 months ago now. Why has no one shown the 2.7? Town of is out here don’t want the Raptor but we also are tired of seeing everyone and their grandmas with the 2.3.. it’s great, sure, but we wanna see the 2.7 PLEASE!!! Cheers..✌🏼

[@shiftymcgee9359]

Not including a basic cab option is a miss for fleet sales and those of us who would like more bed space and don’t need to put a family in the back seat.

[@VineV-Dutch]

VW Amarok has different, more comfortable, front suspension. Buy that one when much asphalt driving is what you do!

[@timliscum2861]

what's the fuel capacity, my 2019 only has a range of like 350 miles when topped off? tank should be bigger

[@jn9604]

Much prefer the old school key; they pretty much never malfunction. Unfortunately I don't like that great big screen they all seem to have now. Fuel economy could be a bit better.

[@robertb7254]

Please note the Ranger is the ONLY Midsize Truck with Amber Turn Lamps on the Tail Lights ….thats important to me and not one review yet has mentioned it….

[@jeremypilot1015]

Why the absolute hell is a Ford Ranger the size of a mid 90s Chevy Silverado??? Where are the tiny trucks??!!

[@Dobbs6651]

Your looking for the Maverick

[@rodimusprime3621]

Ford Maverick. But I get what you're saying.

[@SliderFury1]

You're not wrong. Compact trucks are the size of older mid-size trucks, mid-size trucks are the size of older half-tons, half-tons are the size of older HDs, and HDs are basically tanks 😅

[@yankeesusa1]

Then get a canyon or Tacoma, the ranger is still smaller. Plus you can now put a whole sheet of plywood in the bed, and these trucks are known for their small size and big utility.

[@plmn93]

@@Dobbs6651 I think the Maverick is really well done but the tiny bed really limits what it can be used for. It's a great lifestyle vehicle and for the price a very useful alternative to a car or small SUV. But as a truck it's just not big enough for most people who actually need a truck. The Ridgeline is a little better middle ground IMO, though it sure is ugly.

[@d_manoil1647]

Way better looking than the last cat fish looking one

[@Weak_juan]

I agree with the big man. 4000lb TT for a smaller truck. 7500lb TT for a 1/2 ton.

[@gweggorz]

Great review as always. I was hoping to get one of these when I was looking to replace my old truck last year... but the delays in getting it to the US market were too much for me. That blue XLT you were driving was basically exactly how I would have spec'd mine. I really like what Ford has done to it. I just wish they would have hurried up a little lol.

[@Freynightwalker]

Watching this again, I really like the lariat. This truck is very high on my list. It has great towing capabilities for our small travel trailer.

[@lynnjohnson5511]

You better buy a utility trailer to haul your gear! This is no more than a car with an open trunk! Millennials Genzyme!!!

[@zani.dibrani]

This was a really really good thorough review, through and through. Thank you Sir!

[@danichicago9140]

We have these at an airport i work at. They are the same size as our early 2000s gmc 2500 single cab without any of the utility. The bed is too small to fit anything longer the cabin is tight af for 2 men and their winter coats and gear in the backseat. The funniest part is the gas mileage is on par with our full sized f350 4 door 8' reading beds with cranes and lift gates. We idol alot and routinely i get into rangers with 6-8 mpg averages. Just get the 5.0 f150.

[@Dobbs6651]

Not all of us work at the airport. Most of us just go to the grocery store with our kids.

[@Fernando-t8g]

No

[@drn13355]

So get what we don't want? It needs to fit in a garage. This does. Should someone getting a Porsche also get an F-150? I mean the F-150 is bigger than the Porsche. F-350 is bigger. Should everyone get that?

[@randysavage8963]

Thanks for the real world feedback ,you summed up my opinion exactly

[@plmn93]

Well they aren't making full size trucks that size anymore, but I agree. I did some comparisons a few years ago and the previous gen Colorado crew cab with a 6' bed was longer than a 2004 gen F-150 crew cab while having a lot less cargo and passenger volume, not to mention towing and hauling.

[@shirleygorre6003]

Ford should have put the built-in bed steps on their base trucks too.

[@legion1630]

Hello do you know if Base truck can have a trailer backup assist feature added?

[@robertb7254]

Rear AC Vents are lacking and just get a hot whining 2 year old back there and see if Ford decides to add them like the overseas Rangers do

[@scottyellis3442]

It rides kinda trucky......LOL, You're driving a truck.

[@CraigG21]

What's the payload on that pretty Lariat with the off-white leather interior? Still over 1500 lbs? And no HVAC ducts in the back of the center console for the rear seat occupants?! 😞

[@marklihsu]

Yes I think it was 1551 on the tfl video I watched. Way better than the sr5 at 1200 lbs

[@dannyboy1984]

Not so great looking... look's kind of cheap inside out🤷‍♂️

[@drewelliott9062]

Very cool little truck.

[@YalaTV]

Id be fine w the STX. The 10 inch screen looks great. Now as long as the dealerships dont mark up the truck $10k because of BS reasons I might trade in my bighorn.

[@truthserum5310]

Only buy if you get a minimum of 2-3k off MSRP + tax, w/no other fee's. If they refuse, tell them to POUND SAND, and walk TFO of the Stealership. This is the ONLY way to stop this madness.

[@bubcat54]

Needs a steel bumper

[@GoonieLord]

Everything is getting turbo charged even the new mini vans

[@burkepete110]

if you cannot back your trailer on own you should not be on the road

[@dane5896]

For the third year running, Ford has issued more recalls in a calendar year than any other US automaker. As reported by Automotive News, partial NHTSA data reveals that Ford issued 54 recalls in 2023, affecting almost 5.7 million vehicles. This represents a 21% decrease from last year. In 2022, Ford issued 65 recalls affecting over 8.6 million vehicles, so things are certainly improving.

[@doneB830]

I give any manufacturer the opportunity to fix their problems rather than sweeping them under the carpet.

[@DemsRdisguisedredcoats]

I appreciate Ford recognizing problems and offering a recall to fix them.. unlike Chevrolet trying to hide problems until people get killed, and then being FORCED to do a recall. Funny how idiots judge quality by recalls.. especially voluntary ones. Means that Ford cares, numbnuts.

[@dannykrauskopf7404]

Excellent review and episode as always!!! 😁

[@danieljohnson4418]

The integration of the infotainment screen is horrible.

[@Sports.Doctor]

It seem like the Ford Ranger has upgreaded.

[@jn9604]

A 6 foot bed would have been much better too.

[@mojorisin7371]

It's quite simple to the people who think these vehicle's are ridiculously and scandalously priced, which they are, if they were too expensive and they weren't selling them, then these manufacturers wouldn't charge these ridiculously high prices Why sell a $30k truck for $35k when you can get $55k for the mid level trrim? Don't like it? DON'T BUY IT. Simple as that. When demand is high and inventory low, prices are High. When demand is low and inventory high, prices are Low. Economics 101 🤙🏽❤️

[@WillfulTangentOutdoors]

My 2012 F150 Lariat Crew Cab has a 1,370 payload rating. It’s insane a mid size truck now out classes my hauling abilities. Not complaining just saying how cool it is to see these advances.

[@captaincrypto9660]

Exterior looks outdated already. 👀👀

[@tylerconley9670]

Wish ford would give the us market the Everest!!!! That is a sick suv on the ranger platform….. would be the second coming of hotcakes, which are just pancakes!!!