True Crime Arizona: New tech says JFK assassination "single bullet theory" scientifically impossible

[@davidarbuckle7236]

"Single Bullet Theory is Scientifically Impossible" Thank you. Everyone knows it, it is great to hear more people finally saying it.

[@davidarbuckle7236]

@stddisclaimer8020 Count the Bullets at Parkland. Therein lies the Truth. If there were more than 3 bullets found at Parkland, we obviously have a conspiracy. They are 1) The Paul Landis bullet found in the Limo and placed on the JFK table.(confirmed by Nurse Phyllis Hall many years ago. 2) The not to Magic Bullet found in the Limo by Agent Sam Kinney and placed on a stretcher in the hallway. 3)The Dr. Shaw bullet, (still in Connally's left thigh according to the Doctor when he addressed the Media on Connally's condition. 4) The Nurse Wright Bullet. Found by her husband (a hospital custodian) and given to her and recently shown on a Mark Oakes Video with her explaining how she got it, and how she was advised by her superior to give it to the FBI and chose not to.

[@davidarbuckle7236]

@stddisclaimer8020 Only the Shills paid and unpaid who still cling to to the fantasy that a bullet could make 7 wounds in two people, changing direction and slowing down between the two victims, and then gratuitously be found on a stretcher in pristine condition unless you start counting all of the magic bullets found at Parkland and then you know it is complete bullshit.

[@Astrid-jt8cd]

It started out so happy and ended so tragically. He was so special and we all loved him dearly. We Americans lost our best on that fateful day

[@treeherder2201]

"New Tech??!!" Any 8th grader who has taken a basic Physics course knows it's impossible. This is like saying "New Tech says humans shooting fireballs from their fingertips is scientifically impossible." We are truly a dumb country.

[@tedcarriker3293]

Eventually ??? Same day.. and he was in custody by Dallas police. Paraffin tests showed no Gunshot residue.. from a weapon he held to his shoulder or a gun fired at arms length. Windshield had a pencil ✏️ size bullet hole with spider cracks observed by officials and press. Secret Service replaced the windshield and reconstructed the interior fabric.

[@GeneralTHC]

Good answer on quora about this: The following people stated there noticed a hole in the windshield, some not sure which side the hole was the entrance, while others could definitely stated which side was the entrance, one being an expert in windshield glass. Many of these people were tracked down years later to make a statement. None was called by the Warren Commission to make a statement about the bullet hole. Glanges was a second year medical student and didn’t know the President had been shot but saw the Presidential limo parked at Parkland Hospital. She took a closer look an saw a hole in the windshield. "But it was very clear, it was a through and through bullet hole, through the windshield of the car, from the front to the back". George Whitaker Sr. was a senior manager at the Ford Rouge Plant in Detroit. In 1993 he gave a taped recorded conversation to Attorney Doug Weldon and a Professor of Criminal Justice. Whitaker stated when he showed up for work the Monday after the assassination, November 25th, the Presidential limo already had the interior taken out and the windshield removed. A Ford VP assigned him to manage the work for a new replacement windshield, which meant using the damage one as a template as it was a one of a kind. “And the windshield had a bullet hole in it, coming from the outside through…it was a good, clean bullet hole, right straight through, from the front. And you can tell, when the bullet hits the windshield, like when you hit a rock or something, what happens? The back chips out and the front may just have a pinhole in it…this had a clean round hole in the front and fragmentation coming out the back.” Dallas motorcycle patrolman Stavis Ellis stated he observed that the windshield had a hole in it. In 1971 he told interviewer Gil Toff, “There was a hole in the left front windshield…It was a hole, you could put a pencil through it…you could take a regular standard writing pencil…and stick [it] through there.” Dallas Motorcycle Patrolman H.R. Freeman also spoke to Toff, backing up his fellow officer’s statement. “[I was] right beside it. I could of [sic] touched it…it was a bullet hole. You could tell what it was.” Secret Service Agent Charles Taylor Jr. wrote a report, November 27, 1963, detailing all his activities with the Presidential limo, from its return flight to Washington to riding in it from Andrews Airforce base to the WH garage. In his inspection of the vehicle at the garage on November 22, Taylor logged, “In addition, of particular note was the small hole just left of center in the windshield from which what appeared to be bullet fragments were removed.” Finally St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Richard Dudman wrote an article for The New Republic, December 21, 1963. “A few of us noted the hole in the windshield when the limousine was standing at the emergency entrance after the President had been carried inside. I could not approach close enough to see which side was the cup-shaped spot which indicates a bullet had pierced the glass from the opposite side.” Now the confusion begins. There is a windshield supposedly from the JFK limo, on display at the National Archives today that exhibits long cracks - not a through-and-through bullet hole - and is damaged on the outside, which is opposite of what Kellerman noted by physical examination on 27 November 1963. Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman (who rode in the right front seat of the limousine in Dallas) testified before the Warren Commission, in March of 1964, that when he examined the windshield (obviously the replacement, installed by Whitaker’s team in Detroit) on November 27th, it was smooth on the outside, and damaged on the inside. This is consistent with damage caused by an impact on the front side of the windshield. (Safety glass exhibits damage on the opposite side from which it is struck). Researcher Robert P. Smith (as reported by David Lifton in Best Evidence) interviewed a Mr. Bill Ashby, crew leader at the Arlington Glass Company, who told Smith he removed the limousine’s windshield in Washington, D.C. on November 27th; this occurred after Roy Kellerman had felt the interior surface earlier that day and determined it to be damaged on the inside, and smooth on the outside. Secret Service Agent Charles Taylor Jr. recanted his written report of November 27, 1963, of their being a hole in the windshield after viewing the windshield at the National Archives, which just had a crack. Taylor wrote in his affidavit to the House Select Committee in 1976 reversing himself, saying: “… I never examined this apparent hole [on November 22, 1963] to determine if there had been any penetration of the glass, nor did I even get a good look at the windshield in well-lighted surroundings …“I have no doubt that the cracks… cracks in the inner layers of the glass only, are the ones I noticed on the trip from Andrews Air Force Base … it is clear to me that my use of the word ‘hole’ to describe the flaw in the windshield was incorrect.” When the Presidential limo was originally delivered for service, it came with many replacement windshields that the Secret Service tested for security by firing bullets at some of them. This would explain why a cracked windshield without a hole is residing in the National Archives. Agent Taylor’s 1976 affidavit is useless, as he based his statement on the windshield he viewed at the National Archives, and there is a 12 year time barrier from his 1963 written report. Pressuring people to change their testimonies to comply with official government reports, is nothing new. Their is a saying in Washington DC, “To get along, you go along.” You make waves, you get washed out.

[@PwerhisyoPinsala-oq9xy]

The 1st bullet fired from in front that's why a hole pass through front glass of the limo

[@PwerhisyoPinsala-oq9xy]

2nd bullet came from gun squizzed by John Connolly. Then lean down his seat if Connolly was also wounded no blood stained left to his seat

[@steveandrews7088]

What no pictures?

[@911Kongen]

If all evidence points to Oswald, one thing can't change that. If your result is against all other evidence, you do not understand your result. If you know someones dna is on the crime scene, but there is a billion evidences that that person was on the other side of the earth when the crime happend, you have not debunked all the billion evidences. You just do not understand your findings. People do not seem to understand this fact. I see a lot of possible explanations for this result, but I do not know what is the facts. However I do lnow that one weird finding does not automatically counter all other evidences. That is not how the real world works!

[@davidarbuckle7236]

The forensic evidence is what should determine the facts. And, the problem with the forensic evidence is that there was an obvious effort to interfere with it when they muscled the body and car out of Parkland before the forensic investigation could be performed. But luckily, we have the evidence of the bullets. And there are just too many of them. (4) Let me count them for you. 1) The not so magic bullet found in the Limo by Agent Sam Kinney and placed on a stretcher in the Parkland Hallway. 2) the Paul Landis Bullet found in the Limo, and placed at the feet of JFK on his table. (later confirmed by Nurse Phyliss Hall) 3) The Dr. Shaw bullet as stated by the Dr. found in Connally's leg and NOT REMOVED as of his Pressor with the Media. 4) The Nurse Wright Bullet found by her husband (hospital Custodian) while trying to use the bathroom when he inadvertently knocked it on the floor from a stretcher. He gave it to her and she TOOK IT HOME even though she was advised by her superior to give it to the FBI. She revealed the bullet in a Mark Oakes video that can be seen on the Vince Palamara channel.

[@ronmarvicsin7709]

All the evidence points to Oswald? As in that he pulled the trigger? He was the “lone assassin?” Am I understanding you right? I’m confused at your statement. Please elaborate

[@KathyJensen-vh2yk]

Wow ! I hope for truth . JUSTICE.

[@KathyJensen-vh2yk]

Nov 22 1963 60 years ago 🕯️

[@jimcypher]

When will AI figure this one out?

[@evertvanderhik5774]

Newton's law, conservation of momentum

[@James-ll3jb]

Actually physicists have demonstrated the single bullet theory is anything but impossible!

[@mikeensing3276]

I’m going with other computer re-enactments that show a straight line from the 6th floor window thru JFK and Connally - and also tests that show the same type of bullet Oswald shot going thru a solid block of wood relatively unscathed. This doesn’t disprove those tests

[@Squishmallows288]

If you are referring to the Nova Episode cold case, with laser research from 2013, the difference is this one has first done a total virtual survey of the exact positions of all surfaces and points in the setting, including street level and elevation details, . we've seen how far video game graphics and 3d has come in this time also. So the Nova episode could have easily gotten the angle of the car a few degrees off compared with this method. seems to be their claim.

[@mikeensing3276]

Knott has Connally positioned wrong to support their claims

[@mikeensing3276]

How does the wound from the tumbling bullet happen on the straight line in this scenario? How does it wind up in Connallys leg? How did it go through the limousine first?

[@youme112233]

Zabruder did not take a video sweethart , it is called a Film . Taken with a Film Camera . The act of taking a film , is called Filming , or Shooting A Film .