Trustworthiness and Validity in Qualitative Research Design

[@Fifi-yh6fy]

Thank you Scott, my supervisor had just returned my proposal to explain more on credibilty and trustworthiness. You have made it crystal clear. I can't thank you enough🙏🙏

[@familymail6635]

Informative and easy to understand. I think this would be great for undergrads who are starting out in research for their capstone projects!

[@annikamin1637]

This is very helpful! I really appreciate the comparison with positivist paradigms. I also really appreciate how these are broken down into categories and lists. Thank you!

[@kwazinkosisibanda1287]

You are a great teacher sir. A very clear presentation.

[@TheUmaragu]

Very nice explanation Scott Self; the pace of the explanation is quite good, the example is valuable, the graphics supports this quite well.

[@johnmathew8102]

Excellent presentation!!👏👏

[@LinhVo-ni4wd]

Wonderful presentation. Thank you very much!

[@cherrygupta7971]

This is fr an amazingly informative video!

[@abenadonkor1445]

So grateful for the detiailed explanation

[@shanicebrown838]

This is an amazing masterpiece!. ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT! Thank you so much😇

[@colleenfitz-gerald9991]

Excellent presentation - increased my understanding for my postgrad research. Is there a transcript of the presentation.

[@alirezamoafi8321]

This was excellent. I am profoundly grateful as I have my Dr viva and helping a lot. Difficult scattered concept made easy (ish:) and organised.8/10.

[@weiwei5537]

Very clear explanations

[@adarksea]

Great video!!

[@ms.conner5963]

Dr. Self, Is Guba's comparative paradigm from 1991 or 1981?

[@sphekza]

Brilliant. I have learnt a lot. So on point. May I please reference this as I would like to use some of what you are saying here, in my own work.

[@scottself7894]

Of course. Happy to be helpful

[@michwarn]

very helpful and clear!

[@pranavramraj5141]

Thank you so much 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@mbuskie]

I dont get it

[@muhammadfaisal9918]

Thanks Scott. Very useful. Could you please share the complete reference of Terrell, 2016?

[@scottself7894]

Thanks for the kind words. Of course; here is the full reference: Terrell, S. R. (2016). Writing a proposal for your dissertation: Guidelines and examples. New York: The Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1-4625-2303-0 or 978-1-4625-2302-3

[@gargisingh317]

Thanks 😊

[@timmillington]

Great video thankyou, has anyone got the full reference for Terrell 2016 used in this presentation please?

[@scottself7894]

Terrell, S. R. (2016). Writing a proposal for your dissertation: Guidelines and examples. The Guilford Press.

[@adie5137]

Thank you so much for uploading this! I have a question though: This topic of trustworthiness usually write before data collected (chapter 3 of methodology) or after data collected (Chapter 4 of Findings and Discussions)? Thank you!

[@scottself7894]

The correct answer is - whatever your chair says (wink). I usually advise my students to put this section after the data analysis section in chapter 3, before ethics and limitations and delimitations. You want to describe a plan for trustworthiness in Chapter 3. Hope that helps.

[@TheAssez]

*Thank you!*

[@missacm4602]

Could you share your work - Self, 2019 - please?

[@scottself7894]

Hey there - not sure what you're asking, but I'd be glad to help. Let me know more specifically what your request is.

[@jermaincooper26]

@@scottself7894 I believe they are looking for the reference (Self, 2019) that was highlighted at the 11:48 mark of the video.

[@hgostos]

Thank you very much.

[@lisae.claytor7216]

WOW!

[@VernelAGarma]

Thank you very much.

[@MrPapakonstantinou]

Thank you!!!