Type 1 : occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true Type 2 : occurs the null hypothesis is accepted when it is false
@VickyPatel129310 ай бұрын
You can easily understand this concept by considering an example... Let's assume we are assessing whether a patient has cancer or not. If our model predicts a positive result, but in reality, the patient does not have cancer, it is a false positive (Type 1 error), which is not harmful in the case of cancer. However, if the model predicts a negative result, and in reality, the patient has cancer, it is a false negative (Type 2 error), which is very detrimental to our model. Therefore, our focus should be on reducing this specific misclassification error.
@AkashSharma-ij4sn9 ай бұрын
this is understandable but the way he created the relation with confusion matrix to conclude type1 and type2 error thats not clear
@harmeeksingh23209 ай бұрын
Sir you have no idea how good you are as a teacher, this playlist has really helped me to learn a lot about the Applied Statistical Analysis. I request you to please complete this playlist. Thank you very much. Keep up the good work.
@SaurabhSingh-sy1pe5 ай бұрын
@12:15 it will be type 2 error or False Positive @13:59 it will be type 1 error of False Negative
@AjitKumar-fs9lc3 ай бұрын
Oh bro thank you , I've been confused for the past 30 minutes yaar.
@hairavyadav6579Ай бұрын
Mai v confuse ho gya tha
@somanshgirdhar4239Ай бұрын
he is right in this part but opposite in initial 2
@sanch623910 ай бұрын
Krish sir, I think "Outcome 3 = FN(Type 2 Error)", & "Outcome 4=FP(Type 1 Error)". But in video you said vice versa. Please check it once again.
@suronitachandra57919 ай бұрын
Yes also I think so
@OBECEOODishantKorat8 ай бұрын
yes, you are right. he made a little mistake. Type 1 : occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it is false Type 2 : occurs the null hypothesis is false when it is true
@jaykishan36336 ай бұрын
SuPPerbbb explained Sir...
@Chandra3663 ай бұрын
😮 Thanks sir...
@ashushukla887910 ай бұрын
in 12:05 you said in prediction it is false(0) and in reality it is true(1) then it should be FN but you take it as FP. please clarify
@kumarkirti44389 ай бұрын
Yes it should be FN
@SumanSadhukhan-md4dq7 ай бұрын
Yes you are right it should be FN
@physics36035 ай бұрын
Please sir help me to solve this confusion or some one please please explain if I am wrong 3:31 yaha pr aapne kaha he ki , FP(i.e predicted true but in actual it is false) is type 1 error and FN(i.e predicted False but in actual it is true) is type 2 but here 12:28 , you say that we rejected the null hypothesis but in actual it is true that means it becomes FN sir , so It should be type 2 error but you say that it is type 1 error
@ankitprasad14074 ай бұрын
you are right bro, sir mistakenly switched the error types
@baithak34387 ай бұрын
Your FP and FN need to reverse in confusion matrix . They r causing real confusion .
@sagardeepsingh51515 ай бұрын
true
@hsk77159 ай бұрын
Confusion matrix kafi confusing hey
@nayeemx116 ай бұрын
please complete full statistics for DS/ML
@ShakiraGCET11 ай бұрын
Hello Krish after completion of this course will you help us in interview process also
@ZibaFact11 ай бұрын
Thanks 😊👍🏻
@user-hl9tc9qg3w8 ай бұрын
Thank you sir
@rajkumardubey548611 ай бұрын
To reduce this type 1 and type 2 errors is there any other way to reduce it other then hyperparameter tuning, threshold value adjustment
@ZibaFact11 ай бұрын
Good question
@DaytoDaylifechain_wow5 ай бұрын
Brother 1 thing is wrong that you consider (0)of actual instead of predicted so basically outcome 3 should be FALSE NEGATIVE
@sumitsaxena72452 ай бұрын
great knowledge
@bitknowledge.249329 күн бұрын
❤
@punitbhadayuia5 ай бұрын
Type 1 and type 2 error in your confusion matrix diagram is interchanged. Please edit and do correction. This decreases our confidence in your videos
@alopsingh477210 ай бұрын
dimang ki upar se gya
@VickyPatel129310 ай бұрын
mera comment refer karo shayad aapko help karega confusion matrix samajh ne me