[2025加州大火---挖苦問與答] 問:2025這次的加州大火,燒得很不一樣啊。 答:一樣是燒房子啊!老戲碼了,有什麼不一樣? 問:燒到富人區了,以前沒燒過富人區的。 答:嗯,這樣說來,是有點不一樣。 問:我就納悶,一月7日剛開始有火時,民眾報案,為何消防隊不理? 答:因為加州的傳統規則是,讓火自然焚燒,咱要尊重自然生態。 問:很快的就燒到市民居住點了,為何消防隊還是沒救火? 答:因為都是沒繳錢的住戶,消防隊沒必要動作。 問:後來燒到富人區了,他們應該有繳錢了吧!? 答:那時發現,消防栓沒水。 問:那水庫應該有水吧!? 答:水庫也沒水。 問:那不是海景第一線的海景房嗎?已經是海邊了,海有水吧!? 答:因為用海水撒在陸地,容易造成土地鹼化。 問:都燒到家門口了,還在擔心鹼化? 答:怕土壤鹼化後,降低當地土地價值。 問:那燒完之後呢?可以拿到火險理賠金吧!預估可以拿幾成理賠金? 答:沒有理賠金! 問:為什麼? 答:因為早在幾個禮拜前,保險公司就已經通知保戶,加州自2025年起,除非願意另外簽訂高額保險契約,否則自動解除火險賠付,絕大多數的住戶,已經失去保險給付資格。 問:那災民該怎麼辦? 答:根據經驗,聯邦政府將提供緊急援助,協助修繕和重建房屋,雖然必須經由國會通過,但從經驗上來說,應該是會通過。 問:也就是說,無論這次損失有多大,聯邦政府都會解決? 答:你答對了!不愧是美國人! 問:聯邦政府有那麼多的錢嗎? 答:咱美元有印鈔機啊,印完之後,問題就解決了。 問:印完之後?那你這樣印錢,誰來還錢? 答:全世界啊!全世界的人,只要有用到美元的,共同分擔啊! 問:怎麼分擔?誰願意分擔啊? 答:不用他們同意啊!等到他們感覺到通貨膨脹後,自然就知道了!" --------------------------------------------- [2025 California Wildfires - Satirical Q&A] Q: The 2025 California wildfires feel quite different this time, don’t they? A: Still burning houses! Same old story. What’s so different? Q: It’s burning through the wealthy neighborhoods this time. That’s a first, isn’t it? A: Oh, you’re right. That is a bit different. Q: I’m puzzled. When the fire started on January 7th and people called 911, why didn’t the firefighters respond? A: Because California’s golden rule is to “let nature run its course.” We must respect the natural ecosystem. Q: But soon enough, the flames reached residential areas. Why didn’t they fight the fire then? A: Those residents didn’t pay their dues. No payment, no service. Q: Then it spread to the wealthy neighborhoods. Surely, they’ve paid their dues? A: By then, they realized there was no water in the hydrants. Q: But California has reservoirs, right? They must’ve had water! A: Reservoirs were dry too. Q: Wait a second. Aren’t these beachfront mansions? There’s literally an ocean right there! A: Using seawater on land can cause soil salinization. Q: The fire was at their doorstep, and they were worried about salinization? A: Damaged soil could lower property values. Q: After the fire, homeowners could at least claim fire insurance payouts, right? How much do they expect to get? A: Nothing at all! Q: Why not? A: A few weeks ago, insurers notified policyholders that starting in 2025, fire insurance coverage is void unless they pay for a premium contract. Most didn’t. Q: So, what’s next for the victims? A: Based on past events, the federal government will step in with emergency aid to help rebuild homes. It’ll need congressional approval, but it usually passes. Q: So no matter how much damage there is, the federal government will fix it? A: That’s correct! You’ve got the American spirit! Q: But does the federal government even have that kind of money? A: We’ve got printing presses, don’t we? Just print more dollars, and problem solved! Q: What happens after you print all that money? Who’s going to pay it back? A: The entire world! Everyone using U.S. dollars will pitch in. Q: How will they pitch in? Who’s willing to do that? A: Consent is irrelevant! Once inflation hits them, they’ll figure it out.
Zackerberg 終於不裝了,想通了:鬥不過,就加入。如今連 high tech 公司也不得不依附一個大黨嗎?OpenAI 的 CEO Sam Altman 已經叫囂,以美國為首的 “民主 AI” 必須打敗以中俄為首的 “專制 AI “。中國政府考慮讓 Elon Musk 接手 TikTok America (美國部分)。瘋了,瘋了。
Why guest for Taiwan TV are so emotional. They talk like some uncle at market having tea or coffee complaining someone or government. Be more constructive and structural to move towards changes