Amazing channel, took my interest of phys chem to another level!
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
That's what I like to hear!
@gowtham51689 ай бұрын
nice.much knowledge condensed in one video .. that keeps it engaging .
@Bow503 Жыл бұрын
The writing backwards is impressive
@PhysicalChemistry Жыл бұрын
Not as impressive as you think: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j57Ze4mhrq-VgsU
@sidewaysfcs07183 жыл бұрын
Lanthanide compounds are usually phosphorescent because those are spin-forbidden transitions. The lifetime of those excited states are ~ 10^-3 s. Persistent luminescence ( minutes, hours) can actually be both fluorescence OR phosphorescence, the extremely long lifetimes are due to electron traps in point defects in lattices. Phosphorescence is NOT defined by lifetime, but by spin change.
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
Good comments, thanks. The preceding two videos on fluorescence (kzbin.info/www/bejne/nnauaISfasufj7c) and phosphorescence (kzbin.info/www/bejne/jGSVlqtvmqh5fqs) -- both linked in the suggested videos on top right -- have more info about spin and timescales for those two phenomena.
@NicholasLeeson Жыл бұрын
What type of luminescence causes the aurora lights? Thanks
@PhysicalChemistry Жыл бұрын
Great question! This is collisionally excited emission. Particles from the solar wind (e.g. an electron) collide with atoms or molecules in the upper atmosphere (e.g. an oxygen atom), leaving them in an electronically excited state (e.g. ¹D). That excited atom or molecule then releases energy by emitting a photon (e.g. 557 nm). Different collisions produce different colors of auroral light
@NicholasLeeson Жыл бұрын
@@PhysicalChemistry Cool, thanks for your response. Do you know if it's all fluorescence, i.e. the lifetime of the excited electron is on the order 10ns; or are we dealing with phosphorescence, i.e. within 1us? Or is both, depending on which atom is being excited? Thanks again.
@PhysicalChemistry Жыл бұрын
@@NicholasLeeson It's slow, "forbidden" transitions, but it wouldn't be called phosphorescence because the source of the excitation energy is collisions with particles, not light
@NicholasLeeson Жыл бұрын
@@PhysicalChemistry Great, many thanks 😊
@nicolenew17082 жыл бұрын
INCREDIBLY COOL
@alexandere99282 жыл бұрын
What about electroluminescence? We use electricity to produce light
@PhysicalChemistry2 жыл бұрын
Yes, definitely! That's more a common and practical phenomenon than some of the others on my list.
@adabigeertac73644 жыл бұрын
this video was really helpful.
@PhysicalChemistry4 жыл бұрын
Great, glad you thought so
@shorifahmed2613 жыл бұрын
Lovely ❤
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
Very cool stuff, right?
@Jasmera3 жыл бұрын
Cool!
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
I agree!
@abogeteddy12993 жыл бұрын
Quite informative but You forgot about sonar luminescence .
@PhysicalChemistry3 жыл бұрын
Yes, good point. Sonoluminescence is quite cool, too