My thoughts after using Luna from UAD for music production. Its not good.
Пікірлер: 26
@cmdkaboom3 ай бұрын
Luna for windows works fine on my machine. There are bugs they need to fix and features added. It's been very stable for me.
@jeffbridges61104 ай бұрын
Im a Reaper user. Tried this for a few days. I guess it's ok for a free DAW. But honestly I'd never use it. No piano roll , and the work flow is just awful.
@OhponStudios3 ай бұрын
Agree completely
@Pummelfay4 ай бұрын
Ua has become such a joke
@iceprada23 ай бұрын
How?
@kuandemarco54984 ай бұрын
I just started using Luna 2 days ago. I lok being down was an issue for too.. I produce in FL and love the soft saturation. I typically track Vox and mix in protocol. Luna will replace Protools in My workflow it’s the best sounding (if you prefer an analogue sound) out of all the DAWS IMO. I have an Apollo and the Unison integration helps my work flow by not having to bounce back and forth on my mixer screen. Short Keys are almost same as PT. Great for Mixing and Summing but if you prefer an all in one DAW to teach, use midi, and mix in, it’s not a switch. The midi features aren’t what make Luna dope. It shines for mixing though.
@iTrensharo4 ай бұрын
Avid has HEAT for Pro Tools, but it's an additional purchase if you don't have a support contract. Sounds good. Lots of companies make good analog-modeled plug-ins. I think the killer feature for LUNA are its Summing Extensions and integration with Apollo Interfaces (at least on macOS - Windows is not as good in that department). You can basically control the interface entirely from within the DAW. All of that is integrated. Even the Pre-Amp Gain, etc. is controlled in LUNA, without having to run the Control Panel software for the interface. For Producers, LUNA works best as an accessory DAW - the DAW you go to for Mixing. You'd produce on Maschine, MPC, or in FL Studio or Ableton, etc. and then bring the Stems over to LUNA for mixing... the way many people do with Pro Tools or whatever other DAW they choose. I still think it's quite expensive, since the optimal workflow kind of assumes UA Hardware and UADx Plug-ins. The cost for the LUNA Pro Bundle and UA Plug-in Bundles can add up, even during 50% Discount periods. $199 for the LUNA Pro Bundle and $299 for the UAD Everything Plug-in Bundle is still almost the cost of Pro Tools Studio or Cubase Pro, more than Studio One Professional or Digital Performer, and far more than Logic Pro. Without the UAD Hardware and Extension/Plug-in Bundles... why bother?
@traezaX14 ай бұрын
Online ... Only??? That's a huge no for me
@alunorb47713 ай бұрын
If you have your licences on an iLok USB key you don't have to be online.
@traezaX13 ай бұрын
@@alunorb4771 But it is a limited DAW... Used it abit... Will stick to FL 24
@terrytimberlake89262 ай бұрын
Hold up.. 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 the best and knowledgeable comment. but people are so stupid to accept the fact that they have to be online to work this dumb daw..
@Malvo68203 ай бұрын
I like it, but it crashes a lot. I took it off my computer until they get the kinks out.
@GaryMeadowsMusic4 ай бұрын
I did download luna just to try it. I'm a cakewalk user since sonar 1. I know cakewalk and love it.I record real audio tracks,hardly ever any midi. I played around with luna a little, not all that impressed so far.
@OhponStudios3 ай бұрын
I absolutely love cakewalk and think it's so underrated as a DAW, maybe because it's free it loses creditability? But if you're just mixing, editing and engineering audio then Cakewalk is more than capable. In my opinion, as good or better than pro tools.
@TrippJamesGigTalk2 ай бұрын
It's garbage I'll stick to protools
@OhponStudios2 ай бұрын
Lol!
@HR26353 ай бұрын
well at least you can start it... I cant even get it to load. Im an IT pro for 20+ years. I have used most other daws on my laptops, no major issues. That why I stick with reaper. Always works, faster and way more customizable than any other daw. And no restrictions.
@kennedylee22484 ай бұрын
Can i use Luna for live karaoke like Cubase or Studio one ?
@OhponStudios3 ай бұрын
I'm not too sure, look at a couple forums and it doesn't seem like if possible it's the best software for that. It doesn't have good monitoring from what I've experienced when using it and you'd want that for vocal playback while performing into the mic
@soundsfromYYBY2 ай бұрын
CW dont support 4k hidpi
@faizaldric4 ай бұрын
luna in windows still beta. im using luna for a year now only for mixing. for production still in logic. they're new DAW so we need to wait they will improve it.
@OhponStudios3 ай бұрын
I can see that. I enjoy certain aspects of the DAW and even being a UAD customer I'm batting for them. But they need to change A LOT for it to compete with other DAWs if youre producing and mixing
@faizaldric3 ай бұрын
@@OhponStudios yes you're right i think they make Luna for record and mixing like in console.