Unbelievable! The Easiest Way to Bypass AI Content Detection - How I Did It!

n the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the arms race between AI content creation and detection is becoming increasingly complex. Technologies are being leveraged to bypass AI content detection, presenting a challenge for institutions relying on systems like Turnitin to safeguard academic integrity.
Get Undetectable here: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/6av
Get Phrasly.ai here: phrasly.ai/?via=2w241
Get Originality.ai: link.andrewstapleton.com.au/0c5
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ My best KZbin advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
The pursuit to humanize AI text, to make it indistinguishable from human-written content, has given rise to an array of AI content detection bypass tools. These tools aim to produce undetectable AI content that can slip past the vigilant algorithms designed to root out inauthentic authorship. But the question remains: how to bypass AI text detection effectively without compromising the authenticity and quality of the work?
Creators looking for ways to trick AI content detectors are now experimenting with various methods and technologies. With the existence of bypass Turnitin AI detector free tools, students and professionals alike are exploring the realm of AI content detection bypass, potentially putting the credibility of their work in jeopardy. While these tools promise a way around the sophisticated detection algorithms, they also introduce a debate about ethical practices in digital content creation.
The strategy of using AI detector bypass mechanisms poses a significant challenge for platforms attempting to ensure originality. It's becoming crucial to understand how to bypass AI content detection not just to utilize these techniques, but to defend against them, ensuring that the sanctity of original work is preserved in academic and professional fields. As AI continues to advance, so does the need for robust countermeasures to maintain the integrity of written content.
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Setting up the experiment
01:08 What is the best AI Detection tool?
02:01 Phrasly.AI Ai Detection Test
03:09 Stealth Writer AI Test
03:45 Undetectable AI Detection Test
05:15 Bypass AI Detection Test
06:41 Hix AI Detection Test
08:32 The Output from AI Bypass tools
................................................
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ Recommended Apps, Books and Courses: academiainsider.com/recommend...
AI TOOLS
▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
▶ Chat with PDFs, Websites and more: HeyGPT - heygpt.lemonsqueezy.com/?aff=...
▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED KZbin TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
Instagram: / drandystapleton
TikTok: / drandystapleton

[@DrAndyStapleton]

You'll be SHOCKED by the 12 FREE AI tools that are about to TRANSFORM academic research in 2024: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p3OXeXqDq9ebrac

[@chunnaiyamspo5062]

PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED

[@mr4069]

For your next test use 4 papers: 1) AI generated, 2) human generated, 3) AI generated/AI rewritten, and 4) AI generated/human rewritten.

[@chetaobika]

Thanks for this video. Love watching your videos!

[@tharunB-gj8ei]

Bro, you dropping bombs. Thank you.

[@sultansaeed7136]

Originality is a scam, I'm not sure if you're promoting this tool or you have actually tested it. I copy text from books old papers long before Ai trend most of them were labeled as Ai generated content.

[@shaneegan7354]

Absolutely. My own original writing from 10 years ago are flagged as 88% AI.

[@jerichodejesus3047]

I agree with you, all of my paper always flagged as ai even i use the best ai humanizer called Undetectable AI

[@christosandreev6392]

​@@shaneegan7354had the exact same experience. Pasted my Masters thesis from 2017 before any LLM existed for this matter. It flagged it as 80% AI

[@h.z1793]

​@@shaneegan7354 I know right. Like I don't understand how do we supposed to have a good writing if all the good words are flagged as ai? Do we have to use stupid words to make us look stupid for it to not be detectable as ai?

[@elzoemalku4598]

absolutely ....👌

[@_salvax_]

The likelihood of misclassification remains high for non-native English speakers/writers who use AI tools to improve fluency of their documents. That being said, wouldn't it be fun to have a tool that once applied to older texts would show how many of them were written by enslaved research assistants while signed by the big guns of the dept ? So, why is AI generated text such a scandal whereas assistants generated work has not been so for decades

[@imthinkingthoughts]

yep, nailed it with this one

[@chunnaiyamspo5062]

Hi Andy. Great content! But please do more content on PhD and postdoc research. especially on some supervisors who take all credit, e.g., there are many supervisors who take first author even if the majority work is done by the student etc etc

[@RumahBahasa101]

Hi Andy, the turnitin that you are using is the normal turnitin or the turnitin AI? if im not mistaken, turnitin has turnitin ai version.

[@ashwinramaswamy4059]

I dont mean to be a partypooper here Andy but i follow you because of your excellent content about the hard (and sometimes funny) truths about research and academia, and the occassional tips and tricks for productivity from a veteran researcher who saw the light. But of late most if not all the content is about flashy new AI tools. Having tried some of them, it's (a) overwhelming because there are SO MANY and i cant really make sense of whats good; (b) the generative AI's mostly feel unfit for research no matter how good they are today, simply because they do not seem up to the mark and more often than not are like an overconfident student likely to lack nuance. I get that a guys got to eat, and nothing against honest endorsements or even promotional content honestly, but id love to see some of your old content back as well - even the stories were hilarious. Maybe you do put them out but i only get notifs for the videos about the tools. Ps im a nobody here, so you can take this opinion with a grain of salt.

[@christosandreev6392]

Andy great video just a small note: It doesn't "know that you're AI". It predicts that there is an x% of being written by AI. It's not like plagiarism where you compare text to text. AI detection is just a prediction and nothing more.

[@abdalazizabuquba2983]

Thanks a lot, which scan level of originality? Standard 2.0 or Turbo 3.0?

[@gingerbreadzak]

00:38 🔍 Turnitin, Originality, and gp0 are tools used for AI content detection. 01:18 💡 Originality was the best at detecting AI content compared to Turnitin and gp0. 04:44 🛡 Undetectable and Fasley were the best at bypassing AI content detection tools. 06:19 💬 Bypass AI was able to fool Turnitin but failed to pass Originality detection. 07:17 👀 Originality was the most effective tool at detecting AI-generated content despite bypass attempts.

[@huktk]

Andy, can we use a conversational tone instead of an educational one in any research paper?

[@delappedesigns]

I'm missing one test: priming Claude by training it to write in your own style via analysing your old texts.

[@astafzciba]

i tried it originality ai was able to detect it

[@user-vt5vn6go7c]

Wonder what's wrong with using AI for academic writing. the goal of a research paper is to find something new, not to write something new.

[@nicholasojoduwaodibor4865]

I love this response ❤😂

[@petergee5622]

If the use is acknowledged by a researcher, then maybe yes, but as the video focuses on how to avoid detection, the aim is clearly not to be open and honest. This is opposite of academic integrity.

[@alimustafa2682]

I wish I could like this twice, hat off for the dedication

[@WagesOfDestruction]

You write with ChatGPT, edit it, and then use a humaniser only on the parts that the detector complains about.

[@shirishchandrasrivastava8708]

Hi Andy, can you make a video comparing DSc & PhD there seems to be very little or vague info on this on the internet

[@densonsmith2]

How is originality at confirming that NOT AI is NOT AI? The last time you did a tool like this it detected everything as AI including my pre AI paper.

[@CertifiedCustomer-by9nb]

Good insight. Wondering Ouriginality assumes by default the submitted content is AI generated?

[@densonsmith2]

How good is originality of confirming that content is NOT AI when it is indeed human generated? One tool you showed in the past detected everything as AI.

[@nedsko1725]

Was the originality ai detection on their standard 2.0 or 3.0?

[@Taayjus]

great video, try Conch AI too :P

[@christopherkraken7625]

Sir, I am not shocked, but pretty interesting. 😀

[@knightpesky6622]

Originality states on their website that it is not suitable for testing academic works because it will often have false positives. I would assume since Turnitin is used by thousands of Universities they error on the side of it being human since 100% AI detection accuracy is basically impossible.

[@charlesnwosu6887]

How did Bro get access to Turnitin?

[@alessiafaggian999]

What about AI based tools like Grammarly or Reverso used by the most non native English speakers? Will they be detected as AI generated texts? Thanks

[@anaszaiter5933]

Originality is not intended for academic writing as they clarify this on their website.

[@igorbigchlen5812]

I wrote feedback to my student for submitting his dissertation, I tested my feedback in turnitin. It was detected 40% AI. I was really surprised as 90% of my writing was in first person form with my suggestions how to improve some aspects in the dissertation. Therefore I don’t trust Turnitin in detecting AI.

[@Go-Big-Red]

shocked

[@amrfouad4008]

What are of them is free?

[@klam77]

OMG! So there's AI services to convert AI generated content and make it NOT look AI to University AI detectors! OMG. My head is reeling at this........

[@klam77]

Have Neri Oxman, Claudine Gay, Francesca Gino heard of these services? OMG.

[@patwyton8517]

I believe in the power of AI as a research tool … but that’s all it is. A tool. I’m all for a hybrid writing strategy between AI and us mere mortals, But, I do believe we should be the dominant partner.

[@attributesheetmusic1772]

Advise, well noted. Thanks a bunch Andy.

[@johnmactavish4451]

Unfortunately, there is no option available for us students who are studying in Africa. You see, most of African countries don't have access that can allow you pay online anywhere in the world even if you are capable of paying. So is there anyway for us students with a very limited access to bypass ai detection?

[@messagedeleted4307]

Hahaha nobody cares about Africa 😂😂😂

[@atogthe1st]

Do it old school and instead of copy and paste just rewrite the ai sentence with your own words

[@atogthe1st]

Also quillbot is free but ai detection is always updating and adapting to new methods best way is do it yourself with ai for resarch

[@johnmactavish4451]

@@messagedeleted4307 Indeed, they only care about natural resources we have because without it, they know their throat will dry instantaneously!!

[@johnmactavish4451]

@@atogthe1st Since I don't have much time, I guess this is the only option available to me that can get me out this mess right now.

[@carpetburns1222]

not sure about undetectable anymore. I had humanised a text and ran it through turnitin and it stated It was made by ai.

[@shawnb4745]

I recently sent a manuscript that I fully wrote to a journal owned by Elsevier. Turnitin detected my preprint copy on a preprint server and the managing editor asked if I could take it off the preprint server (Elsevier owns SSRN). I told him no. Turnitin is ridiculous. Be aware: if you have copies on a preprint server, some managing editors are wankers about this.

[@drpat22]

Your software "humanize" failed with CopyLeaks. I tried 2x to rewrite it with your software and each time it came back 100% AI.

[@talehzamanov6927]

Phrasly is the best. Even thr easy version is able to destroy originality’s Turbo 3

[@chunnaiyamspo5062]

PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.

[@giannmalibiran]

is phrasly free or do u have to pay?

[@matthewplatta5224]

Have you written anything that is entirely original and see what the detection is?

[@patriktatang]

If writing using AI tools is considered wrong or taboo then the same logic of thinking should also apply when using AI to detect AI-assisted writing. Based on this, using AI to detect AI is very wrong, in addition to creating many possibilities of wrong accusations and causing anxiety that should not exist.

[@hussaina.h.salman2425]

Undetectable AI couldn't pass Originality AI Turbo 3.0 :((

[@sidequestsally]

If an average publishing professors' work product were run through credible AI detection, the jig would be up. Makes sense they would pick the worst one for their up and coming students, lol

[@Mr.Taztaztic]

Can you do one with Turnitin?

[@br0th3rtub34]

these didnt work and i got a bad turnit in score

[@folanpaul]

There's a significant difference between generating content from an AI tool, and testing this; and passing your own human work through an AI tool to be reworded. Detection is more interested in the first usage of AI; and not so much in the second usage, as this is what spell-checkers and Grammarly do anyway.

[@NaukaPoProstu]

this test would be complete with your human layer of assessment how rubbish the result was in each case. It's easy to bypass AI if you suddenly make stupid mistakes, for example humanizing often changes narrative to first person which is easy but unacceptable. Detectors simply think it's a daft person and too bad for AI.

[@danielkrupah]

Fake. Don't fall for that. Yes, it can give low AI detection but the content you will get will not fit for a purpose. It gives you wrong content.

[@sagnikmaity6734]

Yes sir..

[@YunusAli-xs1wk]

Guys, this guy is a lecturer who works in a university

[@danielkrupah]

@@YunusAli-xs1wk what does it implies? I am not against him but I am saying that those softwares don’t give you a quality content after running your write up

[@Drganguli]

At the risk of sounding old fashioned I feel that one should write in their own words and avoid AI tools to prevent a loss of creative writing skills and avoid becoming a lazy brain in the long run

[@carultch]

Unfortunately, there is no way to prove your innocence. AI detectors fail on content written in the 90's.

[@bizcraftzone]

If Google detects also so bad, then it's irrelevant what we publish 😂

[@aeronation7465]

Your content was originally your own before you asked it to rewrite so originality was overly excited at detecting

[@sudarshanmedagam8506]

It doesn't look legit as you did not show the entire originality AI score, instead you typed a number in excel leading to suspicion. Moreover, you have referral codes below in description. SOMETHING FISHY!!

[@alinasar9502]

yes, I also thought it

[@fl4675]

Undetectable is a complete waste of time and money as they reduce the content to a tiny fraction. For 1000s words, you get like 20 or similar ratios.

[@grahamashe9715]

You should start an AI channel. That’s pretty much all you talk about these days.

[@navfnt]

alr u def got payed to promote this

[@stealthgpt]

Didn't include StealthGPT because you didn't want to show us beating everyone else? :)

[@petergee5622]

Yeah, help people cheat their way through uni. What a world

[@Iq55779]

Undetectable ai is the worst tool ever. I paid 15$ cause of your video and it didn't even remove 1% ai text. Please do not make such paid videos for personal profits.

[@wildlifechannelsrilanka9065]

Dont use Phrasely its BS. I couldn't even get a 1900 word to humanise. Its a scam.