Uneekor EYEXO vs Foresight GC Quad

  Рет қаралды 8,013

Creel Golf Instruction

Creel Golf Instruction

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 29
@davidnarain8783
@davidnarain8783 2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Would love to see driver comps! Thx
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 2 жыл бұрын
Check out my channel, I did one with hybrid, 3 wood and driver. Thanks for watching David.
@hickorydragon8114
@hickorydragon8114 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how they read big curves differently. Ie big slice or hook.
@jmahalek
@jmahalek 2 жыл бұрын
Great comparison. Your definition of a miss or bad shot is much different than mine. I would love to hit like you do!
@jdegid
@jdegid 3 жыл бұрын
Great video Thanks! designing my Sim and really struggling on what launch monitor to get
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help! Keep in mind there is not a perfect launch monitor but some are better than others for sure. Its all about what to realistically expect from each unit and then decide which you want based on the pros and cons of each. Your doing the right thing in researching. Let me know if you have specific questions. Thank you for watching
@jdegid
@jdegid 3 жыл бұрын
@@creelgolf thank you. My room is 12’ wide 9’ high and about 18’ deep I was looking at either the eye xo or the new GC 3. I Mostly want it for sim play with family and friends my Man cave . Struggling Since I have one lefty in the family but he’s not around too often. Really looking for a great sim ease of play and great graphics Also trying to figure out the whole striking mat situation and would like to have the ability to putt
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
With the width of your room it will be hard to accommodate a lefty with the EYEXO due to a hitting zone that you must stay in for unit to read. With 12 foot wide room the lefty and righty will hit on opposite sides of mat which EYEXO can not accommodate. For EYEXO to work the golfer must hit out of a zone 12" wide so 1 foot. If lefty is part of the equation then the GC3 floor unit may be best bet since you can move from one side to the other which is not fun either! I also have a 9 foot ceiling which puts my EYEXO unit below recommended height which is between 9 and 10 feet. On a 9 foot ceiling the unit will be around 8.5 feet from floor to unit but again it works fine for the most part. I did have to manually focus my cameras in the unit to read properly since my unit is closer than recommended. The Graphics will be based on computer you get and pay attention to graphics card and recommendations for the software you intend to use. Don't go cheap on computer or projector if graphics are a priority. I use CCE mat and putt of the edge of it with not issues. I love the mat but others hate it.
@jdegid
@jdegid 3 жыл бұрын
@@creelgolf thank you for the advice. I think the GC3 is the best bet and was leaning that way since the lefty playing is a rare occurrence. I have a pretty stout gaming / video editing computer with the latest graphics card I ca use Any advice on impact screens and projectors ? Especially for a DIYer. I’m planning on maximizing screen space by installing as wide as possible and adding some type of wall impact solution like foam instead of using prebuilt enclosures . I actually have 9’4” to ceiling from floor and most likely leaning towards a short throw projector but unsure on placement from Screen
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
@@jdegid get a projector that has lense shift capability and placement is then more forgiving.
@russellfothergill9082
@russellfothergill9082 3 жыл бұрын
Would be great to see woods tested too and always against your Flightscope X3
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
wood comparison is up!
@russellfothergill9082
@russellfothergill9082 3 жыл бұрын
Would be great to see an iron comparison against Skytrak if you could get your hands on. Golf sim videos did a comparison with eye xo on woods and the numbers were very close, would be good to see for irons
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
If I can get my hands on one I will do a comparison. I imagine if woods are accurate then the irons and wedges should be due to slower swing and ball speed. I will see if I can find someone locally with one. Thanks for watching.
@3o1Golf
@3o1Golf 3 жыл бұрын
im going to compare my skytrak with the eye xo soon :)
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
@@3o1Golf that would be great to see. I don’t know anyone with a skytrak so I am curious how it stacks up.
@russellfothergill9082
@russellfothergill9082 3 жыл бұрын
@@3o1Golf will be interested to see that. Does your Skytrak have the latest update for spin decay?
@russellfothergill9082
@russellfothergill9082 3 жыл бұрын
Be good to see for mid iron and driver too if poss
@hansbishop7387
@hansbishop7387 2 жыл бұрын
How does EyeXO do on putting compared to the quad? Looking primarily at the EyeXO for simulation
@bgnswtyeyexo8862
@bgnswtyeyexo8862 2 жыл бұрын
It's great on putting. Only issue I've ever had was shot lofted over 35 or so degrees with an open lob wedge. Black wedge solved that problem. Eye XO is great.
@TRH982
@TRH982 Жыл бұрын
If price was no issue, and no need for left hand nor outdoor usage, which one would you go with for game improvement?
@creelgolf
@creelgolf Жыл бұрын
EYE XO, with the ease of adding cameras and then the playback of impact position is great for people trying to improve. Uneekor’s software is really good. I will say that the quad reads dynamic Lie and dynamic loft better but all other data points are similar.
@TRH982
@TRH982 Жыл бұрын
@@creelgolf Thanks! I'm liking the idea of the playback as well
@kursed34
@kursed34 2 жыл бұрын
Does the EYEXO require dots on the club face?
@upstairsgolf3765
@upstairsgolf3765 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, Uneekor uses 1 square reflector on heel and 1 long rectangle reflector on toe to gather club data.
@bradjones1583
@bradjones1583 3 жыл бұрын
how accurate is the putting EYEXO vs. GC Quad? Have you tested both side by side?
@creelgolf
@creelgolf 3 жыл бұрын
They both read H launch, ball speed and total roll distance very closely. EYEXO does not give spin data or skid data like the quad does. The EYEXO also will not read the putter head data like the Quad does. For playing games both work great but if you’re looking for path, lie, face angles along with more detailed ball data then quad is the best out there.
@Kaos033
@Kaos033 3 жыл бұрын
Yes do woods...especially driver!
Foresight GC Quad vs Uneekor EYEXO  hybrid, 3 wood , DRIVER
21:24
Creel Golf Instruction
Рет қаралды 4 М.
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
REAL or FAKE? #beatbox #tiktok
01:03
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Гениальное изобретение из обычного стаканчика!
00:31
Лютая физика | Олимпиадная физика
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
UNEEKOR EYE XO Golf Simulator Review - Playing 9 Holes at Castle Rock
20:56
Golf Simulator Videos
Рет қаралды 13 М.
TrackMan VS GC Quad Indoor Testing
24:30
Sydney Golf Tech (Greg Bayley)
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Uneekor QED vs TrackMan TM4  - 7 Iron Shots
3:42
Par2Pro Golf Simulator & Analyzer Specialists
Рет қаралды 5 М.
How Accurate is the UNEEKOR EYE XO? // Range Test
13:20
Carl's Place
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Uneekor EyeMini vs. Trackman 4 - Crazy Results Incoming!!!!
14:41
GOLFSPORT COMPANY EUROPE
Рет қаралды 6 М.
GC QUAD vs. Uneekor Eye XO - Comparison - Update 2024
8:49
GOLFSPORT COMPANY EUROPE
Рет қаралды 1,1 М.
Tiger Woods' Driver Clinic With Rory McIlroy and Nelly Korda | TaylorMade Golf
16:47
UNEEKOR EYE XO REVIEW - Wedge, Iron, Driver, & Swing Optix Cameras
22:31
Golf Simulator Videos
Рет қаралды 16 М.
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН