00:01 Introduction to Machiavelli 03:25 The Prince Practical advice about statecraft, to new princes 05:25 Virtu Indispensable set of qualities to succeed Principle task of understanding The Prince is to understand Virtu 1. Power to offset Fortuna (luck) 2. Power to get lucky (Fortuna is not providence), ability to seize opportunities 3. Enables you to maintain your state, standing, as a ruler 4. Maintain the jurisdictions and institutions of the state 15:50 Hiero of Syracuse 16:40 Avoid being hated and despised Ok to be feared 18:15 Getting power Many ways Only one way to maintain power - Virtu 19:05 Goal should be glory Do great things 21:30 Other books on advice to princes Justice is essential Cicero - faith, keep your word Seneca - liberality/generosity, clemency (going beyond being just) Three princely virtues - justice, generosity, clemency 26:50 Chapter 15 Machiavelli disagrees, departs massively from conventional advice Follow the three princely virtues only as long as they help you maintain your state (consequentialism) Princely judgement (Virtu) is judging when that is right 32:00 Chapter 18 How far should you keep your promises? Keep your word only if it helps you maintain your state This is confirmed by experience e.g. Pope Alexander VI So that people don't care, be brilliant at dissembling, like a fox 35:05 Summary Be good if possible, be evil when necessary That's a virtuous prince But this is a crude analysis 36:10 However, that is only true for justice Not for liberality or clemency - How Machiavellian was Machiavelli? If they ruin you, how can they be virtuous? 38:10 Thucydides Corcya civil war The first casualty is moral language Evil acts excused as virtues, good actions denigrated 41:00 Aristotle, Art of Rhetoric Manipulate moral language to excuse vices (rhetoric) Quintilian - paradiastole (re-describing vices by using neighboring virtues) Interpretation #2 Thucydides - the rhetorical trick is *pointing out* the re-description of vices as virtues Rutilius Lupus, Rhetorical ad Herennium 47:00 Chapter 16 Concerning Liberality What passes for the virtue of liberality (generosity) is the vice of extravagance Liberality can cause you to raise taxes ==> hatred ==> lose state Therefore being miserly is not a vice 48:00 Chapter 17 Concerning Cruelty and Clemency What passes for the virtue of clemency is the vice of over indulgence Scipio was lax 50:25 Louis XII Parsimonious, therefore could fight wars without raising taxes, therefore generous 51:10 Cesare Borgia Cruel at the outset, but brought peace and prosperity, therefore merciful 51:45 Summary Political virtue - will it help you maintain your state? Justice - often needs to be avoided True liberality always works True clemency always works
@micheleinacharles-hazellem19682 жыл бұрын
This is brilliant … thanks for the generosity
@abrahamdecruz51282 жыл бұрын
@@micheleinacharles-hazellem1968 wonderful summary. You understood the book well and its applicability. Gracias.
@Theblackofmyeyes-74 ай бұрын
Thank you❤
@imago90597 ай бұрын
Machiavelli was a genius when it came to uncovering and explaining the complexity of human behavior and how that applies especially in politics. People often forget to put him in the context of his time and have a broader picture of things. They would appreciate his writings more.
@DryNox5 жыл бұрын
12:30 ‘Moses cheated because God told him what to do, so that doesn’t really count’ I find this statement quite hilarious
@enasshehadeh12 жыл бұрын
I’ll quote this to be the most true short describing sentence for the “prince “ book and among the many unjust and cruel explanations for machiavelli’s great mental faculties “The prince must be someone willing to do evil that good shall come of it “ Thank you for the good lecture .
@adtiamzon36632 жыл бұрын
Professor Skinner, I admire your interpretation of Machiavelli's writing. Excellent! 👏👏❤
@joslynaarons6885 Жыл бұрын
Professor thank you for your magnificent interpretation of Machiavelli’s greatest work, Il Principe. Of all the multiple interpretations I have listened to, about 20, yours tops it all. Grazie mille Professore 🙏
@rishabhkumar43284 жыл бұрын
This is the finest commentary on Machiavelli I have seen or read.
@Dancing77Kat3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant lecture. I especially loved you touching upon disguising vices and when is virtue a vice. Thank you.
@jamesbaseman72978 жыл бұрын
Im a big Machiavelli fan and i would like to thank you for this most interesting lecture prof. Skinner
@coffeefrog9 жыл бұрын
This is a captivating and rich lecture on another incredible mind! Thanks very much to Prof. Skinner!
@humbertogonzalezespinoza78063 жыл бұрын
Notable clase del profesor Skinneer acerca de cómo se maneja realmente el poder desde siempre y hasta hoy y en el futuro......
@MichelMawon49824 жыл бұрын
About 40 minutes in, I think he aptly describes a lot if what's going in today's society regarding the seizing of moral language to advance partisan ideals and redescribing vices as their closely related virtues.
@Hsaelt3 жыл бұрын
Woah, well said. Didn't expect from a black woman, no offence.
@Hsaelt2 жыл бұрын
@Revisionist what
@Hsaelt2 жыл бұрын
@Revisionist why u mock me so 🥺🥺🥺
@Hsaelt2 жыл бұрын
@Revisionist was it really racist tho? Have you seen a typical black american female political take comment? Anyhow sure: Spiker-Man, a friendly neighborhood racist.
@Hsaelt2 жыл бұрын
@Revisionist you're welcome, friend.
@mykindgeeman11 жыл бұрын
Thoroughly absorbing- an amazing lecture and lecturer
@yassinjouihri15785 жыл бұрын
In italian, the word "stato" can mean also a state of something, for example a mental state or an emotional state.
@epic64343 ай бұрын
The emotional state of involvement is for love of course being faithful to country or class to race and maybe extreme to do so without mental capacity to be virtuous I think but it may lean to thick on one side or the other becoming distant from the balance.
@swar31949 ай бұрын
love from persia andfire the sound guy
@calvinginya7186 жыл бұрын
I play this every night b4 going to bed sad I wish I could find more like this
@ripred425 жыл бұрын
Here's some similar videos I have found kzbin.info/aero/PLY9znvXifSMwsjZXYLa_rRF5wtbw62YC6
@SuperBennyboy1234511 жыл бұрын
The first thoroughly enjoyable and absorbing lecture i have ever seen on the subject of Machiavelli
@OhGeeWillickersMister2 ай бұрын
I just read this book and even with what is a less precise translation, it is amazing how people take things out of context. He was not telling people to be unscrupulous or unethical, to step on everyone to reach your goals and to not care about other people as long as you get what you want, but to be wise. In the classroom, you had better believe that strict teachers get better results that nice ones that students know won't hold them to consequences. Yet just as he says in the book, too much strictness without regard to their well being will make you hated. And yes, sometimes bad things are done in the name of keeping order and maintaining that well being, like could be argued about the atom bomb during WWII. It was dropped by Truman, but it was first funded by Roosevelt. FDR had the wisdom to know how to be loved, he originated so many programs to lift up the American people, yet he also was wise enough to know such a weapon might be necessary. That's what Machevelli was talking about. I think the concept has been perverted in modern society a la greed is good, but Machiavelli says greed is bad and does not advocate squeezing pennies out of people just because you can. I could go on and on. I look forward to reading Quentin's books, thank you for this informative video.
@julesjgreig3 жыл бұрын
Best talk I’ve heard on Machiavelli, thank you very much.
@rafabetlejewski67224 жыл бұрын
Wonderful lecture and fantasticly delivered
@EvieMatavelli4 жыл бұрын
The analysis of chapter XV should be its own a TED talk. As a descendant of the man, this is a great class.
@renatosassone-corsi1042 Жыл бұрын
Excellent, wonderful speaker..!
@AmNotHere91110 жыл бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong but the professor's citation of Thucydides description of the perversion of moral language is uncanny in its similarities between Orwell's description of double think.
@taranmurray70465 жыл бұрын
I think you are on the right track here as well.
@artemisios7 жыл бұрын
Per par condicio lo dico in italiano. Il termine "virtù" aveva, ai tempi di Machiavelli, e anche adesso, il significato di "forza", in particolare, di una forza che agisce e crea delle conseguenze. In italiano parliamo tuttora di virtù di una legge, di un ragionamento, o di un farmaco.
@villiestephanov9846 жыл бұрын
..of particular Roman regiment.
@pascaltremblay675210 жыл бұрын
Great lecture!
@leonardodavid28422 жыл бұрын
Just a note, by empeor Antoninus, Machiavelli means Caracalla. Today we distinguish between Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, and Caesar Marcus Aurelius Severus Antoninus Pius Augustus (Caracalla), as Antoninus (because he was the first emperor with such a surname), Marcus Aurelius (cutting it short to avoid confusion) and Caracalla (a nickname), since he had stolen the name in order to associate himself to previous greater emeperors. This is the same thing we do today for Caligula. Ancient historians called him Divus Gaius to distinguish him, bur his real name was Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus (which however was also the name of many other prominant Roman figures including emperors). Bad emperors in general today are just called by nicknames. Great emeperors always keep their favorite name (usually… Augustus is agustus, despite the fact that all emperors were called Augustus). However during the renaissance Caracalla was still called by his prefered name (his fake surname) of Antoninus. The real antoninus was called Antoninus Pius. For example, the baths of Caracalla in the Noli map of Rome are called antoninian baths. As opposed to the baths of Caracalla as we call them today.
@bryfromportal10 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what Machiavelli would have wanted us to believe
@Mike-hu6ch10 жыл бұрын
So deep. Humans are ridiculous man.
@user-hu3iy9gz5j Жыл бұрын
In reality, Machiavelli was the first anti-machiavellian
@MartinDrummond-x6q Жыл бұрын
Machiavelli would not be remotely concerned with what we might believe.
@jalgaonmh19318 ай бұрын
What do you means. .. what he want to believe..i don't understand that..?
@LuLu-tg1okАй бұрын
💥
@eduardoc_costa3 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture.
@maxrappricciardi82183 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. 👏👏👏👏
@gustavonevescoelho58263 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture! Thanks!
@Marjorie-yt7pb Жыл бұрын
Great illuminating Lecture☺️👍
@breezebugatti69428 жыл бұрын
Thank you kindly Sir!
@nelsongonzalez45334 жыл бұрын
A good leader should show leadership by force if necessary and by deeds instead of words, however, a charismatic leader with a strong character and personality could take him very far. Virtud means his attributes and his skills. Thank you very much.
@epic64343 ай бұрын
I think being a leader is allowing or denying chain of commands individually if needing authorization from the top being informed of operations but having explanation for the potential back lash which falls on their watch so he'd obviously need experienced advisors present incase the current position has a good vision for the importance to execute will need communication skills no doubt but not unless they have been denied for reputation that type of character is subject to question so why should we be well regulated? For competence sake
@amitojha93 жыл бұрын
Thank you Professor! A lot.
@hawk04858 жыл бұрын
Consequentialism, when applied to the shortest period of time becomes opportunism and when applied to eternity becomes idealism. To what temporal horizon does Machiavelli bind his judgement of virtue?
@ofamily81805 жыл бұрын
Good question? 🤔
@fukpoeslaw36133 жыл бұрын
max one lifespan ofcourse
@rumpelstiltskin88413 жыл бұрын
Nice interpretation of consequentialism (not really)
@hawk04853 жыл бұрын
@@rumpelstiltskin8841 I'm just playing with the idea, no need to be sarcastic and mean :)
@jscott16222 жыл бұрын
That point about Clemency and Liberality was extremely interesting and something I missed in my reading of The Prince
@epic64343 ай бұрын
I haven't read it just taking the opionated version of the speaker could be wrong but he's giving the lecture not Niccolo it's probably a test but we can only take what is given being that the Prince is a state of mind and thought subject to interpretation.
@yassinjouihri15785 жыл бұрын
There are some mistakes in subtitles, one of them is when he uses latin words but are targeted as italian word
@nomos65085 жыл бұрын
there is quentin tarantino... and quentin skinnner
@shakespearaamina91177 жыл бұрын
one of the amazing professors to learn from! Thank you sir indeed
@Limitless_P7 ай бұрын
Where can I physically attend lectures like these?
@nelsongonzalez45334 жыл бұрын
Nice ☺️ and clear lecture 👍 on the Prince by Machiavelli.
@sunofsotep82653 жыл бұрын
My gosh That was utterly brilliant! Piercingly insightful, and absolutely fascinating.
@sofiahathaway80243 жыл бұрын
have anyone of you read the book 'Quest for Freedom. An Interview with Quentin Skinner'? I'd really recommend it.
@oedrogonzalez70564 жыл бұрын
Great video
@Rico-Suave_ Жыл бұрын
Watched all of it 53:46
@chiefprimo58276 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this youtube post
@emilioperez64355 жыл бұрын
I wonder how high machiavelli would of scored on Robert Hare's psychopathic test.
@jekareloaded93433 жыл бұрын
What's wrong with the sound
@darkrebel123 Жыл бұрын
ugh I cant hear him. the volume is too low even with all my volume settings maxed out
@RozenKnight199011 жыл бұрын
Wonderful lecture. Thank you
@husnibadi8344 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@michaelemorrison8 жыл бұрын
very good lecture.
@helenemasour92564 жыл бұрын
fantastic lecture
@ahsanmohammed13 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@watchit3874 жыл бұрын
In these 50 minutes, I was taken 100 meters below my intellectual depth
@user-hu3iy9gz5j Жыл бұрын
Now we're asking the real questions
@NeilFLiversidge3 жыл бұрын
I can't find that justice quote attributed to Saki. Are you sure he said it?
@theocave71083 жыл бұрын
He's referring to Sacchi (humanist writer)
@BossChronicles9 жыл бұрын
What should i major in and what career should i pursue to be like him
@BossChronicles8 жыл бұрын
+Sven Meier stfu
@marietoft18767 жыл бұрын
Philosophy and history of philosophy of course :-) unless you mean machiaveli in which case diplomat and writer who reads philosophy
@pauline63225 жыл бұрын
Insightful lecture! Thank you so much for this! :)
@rakitipakiti8 жыл бұрын
What a fucking boss!! I loved this lecture!
@onagoity9 жыл бұрын
very good one
@hanzketchup8592 жыл бұрын
Glory is greater than oneself , to be a glorious figure , according to Machiavelli was to restore Rome , how is that a personal credit ? Obviously no man is an island , Machiavelli was a masterful recruiter who valued the Republic , Glory is shared and lasting if the Republic is maintained .
@mellownuance5 жыл бұрын
17:34, lets see if trump retains in the following term
@dengbona44064 жыл бұрын
Lol, he didn’t
@nicolemusic224222 күн бұрын
44:54 - POINTING out abuout realism etc
@nicolemusic224222 күн бұрын
48m - virtue, clemency
@Soloohara2 жыл бұрын
his italian accent was on point
@TheLastOilMan9 жыл бұрын
how can someone be so naive to say these issues doesn't hold now , because we are in a "Democracy " ....weird , ! Where has he been..oh yes academia !
@triumphbobberbiker2 жыл бұрын
Grandioso
@Sunscreen19739 жыл бұрын
Increasingly topical. All we need now is reality.. oh hang on..
@Coyote_Trickster3 жыл бұрын
14:32
@ninirema45322 жыл бұрын
super
@APerez89 Жыл бұрын
Lmao "severus" as his bame implies 🔥🔥🔥😂😂😂😂
@frederickmorris2216 Жыл бұрын
He forgot one of his own rules as an adviser to power ...do not offer advice unless asked for it from the ruler..the reason being that a ruler must never see you as smarter or a threat to him/her..
@OhGeeWillickersMister2 ай бұрын
Maybe that's why he waited until years after his died (in his bed of natural causes) to publish it...
@3dferr11 жыл бұрын
a good explanation about the concept of virtù.
@littlegreenguy41304 жыл бұрын
19:30
@legaliseuprebuggiun3 жыл бұрын
A lightweight beginner by today standard
@villiestephanov9846 жыл бұрын
The word is strongly rooted in Amalekite' s " overture ". Its literal meaning : " Be Instructed, O Jerusalem !" ( Prof. Chomsky would have said it , probably 100 times an hour that, that is which makes "the Prince of the selfish gin ")
@spotify80 Жыл бұрын
The Art of Politics?
@mohamedmansor6111 жыл бұрын
Virtue
@diegoibanez29622 жыл бұрын
After the watching the whole speech I liked the last part when talks about vices and virtue... i dont like their first part definition of virtue with their examples, also how described clemency, and justice
@RogueGaming942 жыл бұрын
would he consider duterte a machiavellian?
@RogueGaming942 жыл бұрын
by virtue, liberality and clemency.
@bryanfurigay70442 жыл бұрын
whos here because of BBM? lol
@Freezencrash9 жыл бұрын
Luck?
@mewmannamwem60875 жыл бұрын
Fertuna
@papageno18493 жыл бұрын
Ok, both "Romagna" and "Romania" are nice countries... but not they aren't the same thing 😏
@saurabhchauhan1002 жыл бұрын
😏
@品味历史品味人生4 жыл бұрын
Machiavelli cleared the bush, Thomas Hobbs built the building.
@chasemorello602 ай бұрын
🦾
@pingukutepro3 жыл бұрын
This awesome video makes me disgust the popular culture depiction of him.
@cliflottjr44357 жыл бұрын
I've only listened to 16 minutes of this lecture and have found much from this professor to disagree with. However, I'm all for Nicollo M. being a topic of discussion though...
@bangersinlondon22317 жыл бұрын
You should go to a public lecture and ask a question...very easy to do. Bet you don't but...
@AngelMartinez-lu3ls3 жыл бұрын
@@bangersinlondon2231 In this day n age the tediousness of monotony of researching & referencing is no longer in the equation. Now you just ask Google n vola! You have the answer to your question(s)...
@dushyantshukla87546 жыл бұрын
Seneca bad luck that was .... hahaha
@ergbudster333311 жыл бұрын
He says if Smith hadn't had a heart attack we would never have heard of Tony Blair. This he says is an example of fortuna at work. Hmm. For a Machiavelli scholar he isn't very Machiavellian, is he.
@jarrodyuki70812 жыл бұрын
machiavelli and ayn rand >>>kant nietzche >>than fyodor or schopenhaeur.
@jeannenicolas17236 жыл бұрын
He wrote The Prince in order to preserve his life. He could have been afraid of The Mdecis.
@joeturc14 жыл бұрын
Fear is the most effective motivator 🤔puts his commentary in perspective
@diegoibanez29622 жыл бұрын
Talks too much about concepts and thoughts, its far away from reality and living politics you extract anything... its just like schollars speech and Machiavelli its a practical guidebook from that time on how princes and rulers should behave and act to adquire Power or Mantain their thrones.
@jensibowable8 жыл бұрын
Why does he have to say men are source material here, did feminists break in here as well?
@user-hu3iy9gz5j Жыл бұрын
He is just appeasing the zeitgeist
@vinozarazzi56332 жыл бұрын
Nothing "successful" about Tony Blair - a hollow nothing in an empty suit.
@user-hu3iy9gz5j Жыл бұрын
If Blair wasn't successful, in one sense or the other, we wouldn't be aware of his existence
@vinozarazzi5633 Жыл бұрын
@@user-hu3iy9gz5j Putin is equally "successful" - both are WEF/Bilderberg Puppets
@bbok16167 ай бұрын
Sleepy Joe is Scipio
@nanayponsing93902 жыл бұрын
PINKLAWANS ARE NOT ALLOWED ON THIS CHANNEL.
@josephsellers597810 ай бұрын
Not near as Machiavellian as Christ and that bs kingdom
@matthewrobinson74273 жыл бұрын
I think he's trying to fool the world my opinon I don't believe he can even see straight therefore it's not a proven fact