UPSC Mains | Philosophy | Paper I | L-6 | Locke and the theory of knowledge | T. Rammohan

[@jaikeyjoppan2722]

Thank you sir for these detailed lectures.

[@RanjitSingh-qm2xg]

A noise goes on continuously from behind during the whole lecture. It hinders comprehension.

[@jaibharat122]

no example for relations?

[@anjaliparihar6124]

Thank you sir :)

[@shubhendusingh2429]

Is Solid as primary quality has the same meaning as we understand(state of matter solid liquid gas) today.

[@swatikumari8434]

Sir tabula rasa was Locke's notion . Or of Aristotle?? Please correct me sir

[@RaamasyaIAS]

The concept had been in existence since the days of Aristotle. Locke formalised it.

[@swatikumari8434]

@@RaamasyaIAS okay sir! Thankyou

[@Jeetnahai_123]

Part 2 price?

[@RaamasyaIAS]

Details are available on the app. Else kindly text/call on 9607233833

[@suryakantbharti7351]

(5 senses mixing together give the idea. i touch and SEE and well to know that i'm touching a wall. ) IS it knowing the substance? kindly help sir.Thankyou 1.07.00

[@incredibleias368]

plz attach the pdfs of the lectures in the description of the video itself or share the drive link that consists the pdfs.

[@NikhilSingh-vg9tj]

Bhai apko tele pe mil jaega

[@anshumanshrivastav7336]

its confusing wheather or not locke was a skeptic well i think he was, can you please enlighten me sir with few points? THIS I GOT ONLINE - John Locke famously claimed that our idea of substance is but a confused idea of “something we know not what.” However, he also thought that the idea of substance is a fundamental part of our ideas of ourselves and the objects surrounding us-of objects we do know. Interpreting this apparently ambivalent stance has long been a major challenge for Locke scholarship. In this article, I argue that the leading interpretations of Locke's conception of substance have failed to resolve this tension because they have misconstrued the source of Locke's skepticism about our knowledge of what substance is. This skepticism, I argue, issues from an observation about the signification of the term “substance”: Locke maintained that the philosophical usage of the term is irremediably equivocal. This reading allows us to acknowledge that Locke could consistently hold that ordinary objects, such as persons, horses, or trees, are paradigmatic examples of substances. It also points to a better appreciation of how Locke's discussion of substance relates to the scholastic conceptions of substance he tried to overcome.

[@lunatic6198]

Plz upload more videos

[@ghost_particle]

thank you sir for these elaborate lectures...