Thanks man, very useful at alternate current system. Thank you a lot
@muhammadtahakhan16494 жыл бұрын
Great work complex equations using cramers through calculator
@fareskhzouz Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much; you helped me a lot. I have an exam, and my calculator can't solve equations containing complex numbers.
@1657joker5 жыл бұрын
thanks man, i have an exam tomorrow and you helped me from this problem :*
@f1memes_4life4 жыл бұрын
Hahaha me 2, tomorrow's the day
@nitinbhattacharyya87845 жыл бұрын
Good Lord,you are a true saviour ,thanks a ton for this
@mohammedarshad35753 ай бұрын
thank you so much bro....i have exam tomorrow.....tq for explaining in the calculator.....
@alnabil072 жыл бұрын
You saved me. love from Bangladesh.🥰🥰
@Drjoudy3 жыл бұрын
I have an exam in 20 mins and this video saved my life Lol thank you
@irishchocolate38726 жыл бұрын
Why am I getting different answers on different calculators? My ClassWiz agrees with this 100%. My TI-36XPRO and Casio 9750GII do not. Even after I re-did the problem several times to make sure I had stored and entered the equations correctly. It would be like playing “Russian Roulette” going into an exam with these machines if they are giving a different answer to the same problem.
@1657joker5 жыл бұрын
notice when input 60
@fahd3983 жыл бұрын
يعطيك الف عافيه يا عبد الله 👏🏼
@shaheenafridi48916 күн бұрын
awesome
@fouzaalsaedi842827 күн бұрын
Can you do for 3 equations
@pranantakrishna58104 жыл бұрын
How can solve 3*3 matrics same process,,,,, Plz replied
@stuartbeattie61623 жыл бұрын
I know this is an old comment and an answer is probably no longer useful, but I will answer for anyone else wondering as I was. If you are trying to solve for 3 unknowns (3x3 matrix) you will have to solve each determinant individually as I'm pretty sure the calculator cannot store more than 9 variables at a time (you would need at least 12 variables including the solution vector for a 3x3). In other words, use all 9 variables to store the elements of the denominator matrix, then solve for the determinant, and reuse any variables to calculate your numerator the same way. If you are still confused about what I mean, do this... 1. enter your variables of your unknown matrix exactly like it appears in this video: store row 1, column 1 into A, row 1, column 2 into B, row 1, column 3 into C, row 2, column 1 into D etc. Use up variables A-F and X-Z (9 variables in total). Like this: | A B C | | D E F | | X Y Z | 2. Calculate the determinant of the matrix by the formula: Determinant = A*(EZ - FY) - B*(DZ - FX) + C*(DY-EX). If you are confused about where this comes from just look up any video on calculating determinants of an n by m matrix. You have just calculated the denominator in cramer's rule (sometimes called DELTA). Write this down as you cannot store it. 3. If you want to solve for the first unknown in your matrix (X, I1, V1 or whatever it represents), replace the first column in the matrix with the solution vector. In other words, if you are wanting to solve for the first unknown, replace A, D and X. For the second unknown, replace B, E and Y. For the third unknown, (no surprises here), replace C, F and Z. 4. Calculate this second determinant the same way you did with the first. This is your numerator in Cramer's rule. (Sometimes called N1 if it is your first unknown). Write down your result. 5. Calculate your unknown using Cramer's rule: Unknown 1 = N1/DELTA, Unknown 2 = N2/DELTA, Unknown 3 = N3/DELTA. Hope this helps anyone that is struggling. Its a pain in the arse that the 991EX can handle both complex numbers and matrix calculations, yet cannot do both at the same time.
@ENG0103 жыл бұрын
@@stuartbeattie6162 you great man
@patpat19822 жыл бұрын
@@stuartbeattie6162 you are a life saver
@theblitz1687 Жыл бұрын
@@stuartbeattie6162 thank uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
@Sigmamaleofhumanspecies4209 Жыл бұрын
Can we use complex and equation/function mode at same time ?
@renanlarrieu2 жыл бұрын
There is no such a way to invert a complex matrix directly?
@specom91616 жыл бұрын
What about 3 unkowns?
@mohammedtifrani45955 жыл бұрын
Hello from Algeria
@ankitasrivastava39662 жыл бұрын
You deserve all the praises in the world 🥺
@asimplus74845 жыл бұрын
How we can solve 3.3
@enessenel63025 жыл бұрын
god bless you
@EEEDarshanBilana3 жыл бұрын
Love you bro❤️❤️. Thanks a lot for this video 😘😍
@padmanabhapanikersatisan89703 жыл бұрын
It was helpful bro..thank you🥳
@aakritibanjara61752 жыл бұрын
do you have any idea to solve when 3 eq is given
@MOHAMEDMOSTAFA-jt2sn2 жыл бұрын
Make substitution of one variable in third equations then u have 2 eq in 2 variables
@taured32802 жыл бұрын
Man u deserve millions of subs
@joshuaolusola7625 Жыл бұрын
This is wonderful ❤😊
@FaisalFaisal-uh1eq5 жыл бұрын
Long process to get the value
@1657joker5 жыл бұрын
it is not too long, but better than missing something while solving on paper.
@vamsinathreddy25835 жыл бұрын
Tell me sir
@zeynepceyhan3596 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much, you are the best
@sigh24992 жыл бұрын
i love you bro♥️♥️♥️
@ENG0103 жыл бұрын
الشكرا قليلة بحقك والله كفووو
@pratyush2331raj3 жыл бұрын
Thanks man for this video
@minhnhutnguyen5754 жыл бұрын
Thank bro, it helps me a lot :D
@pranantakrishna58104 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much brother
@chandanabhishek52185 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro 👍
@theloniousmclean-burrell5949 Жыл бұрын
awesome video!
@abdullahrazzaq56582 жыл бұрын
Love you bro
@d7mmii Жыл бұрын
من طرف ابوعطية
@superdooper18543 жыл бұрын
love u bro .its really works.
@md.nazmushsakib7548 Жыл бұрын
Thanks A Lot. Please, help me find a way to solve the complex polynomial equation using this calculator. Thanks in Advance.
@afzaliqbal22106 жыл бұрын
Can u tell me what do u mean by 60angle50 Btw good explaination for matrix
@xonted59296 жыл бұрын
60L50
@fwandersson93285 жыл бұрын
You will understand it from this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pouUpaGYeJKGo6s
@hariharanramesh9238 Жыл бұрын
It is the phasor representation of the Real part of the Polar form -> Real {A cos(wt+phi)}; here 60 is A and 50 is phi. Its a way of converting trig into complex numbers. You could say its a way of going from time domain to frequency domain. Another way to write this is in rectangular form or in Euclediam form.