Using Data To Find The Best Valorant Player In The World

We're going to end the debate on who the most impactful Valorant players are in the World. Check out www.immortalroadmap.com/platoon for premium coaching!
In this video we calculate some more meaningful metrics which tell us much more about the impact of a player compared to K/D, rating, or KDA to help us end the debate once and for all on who the best Valorant player was in 2023.
Thanks to www.augment.gg/ for providing all the data for my research!
• Why The Fnatic Dynasty... - Fnatic weaknesses video
Support me & the channel: / @platoonval
/ platoonval
#vct #valorant #vctanalysis

[@platoonval]

As of now, there are only 7 spots left for Season 15 of the Immortal Roadmap Program that starts NEXT WEEK! www.immortalroadmap.com/platoon

[@Flashfirexdd]

yo, at the start of the video, you showed a piece of code with if statements and methods to calculate the impact and ratings of players. For this, does the code also directly take in data from the matches or do you have to import the data as a spreadsheet/vlr link? Also, is there anyway to share the code to read?

[@platoonval]

@@Flashfirexdd It just parses a spreadsheet provided to my by Augment.gg. I can give you a snippet here which is what I used to calculate one of the first graphs: paste.ofcode.org/zcTcBs6fx87Q3w4trFkhwd. I saw some others ask about this so in the future I may consider doing some BTS for how I conduct these analyses. Thanks for the comment!

[@Flashfirexdd]

@@platoonval thanks

[@Bitsen0910]

Why wasn’t Lock/In used in the data set? I feel the charts might look different I think Chronicle especially (although not best player contender) is pulled down by his poorer performance at Champions compared to Masters and Lock/in and more data would be better + I’m interested to see how it changes the data. Is there anyway you could compare/publish the data with lock/in added?

[@rxjwardhan_7511]

Jingg also received #1 player in APAC award this year itself, its sad to know he wont play in 2024(i literally copy paste his playstyle, res etc)

[@sturts1234]

Jingg has been the best 1st and 2nd entry of PRX with his trading and entry...when something was included he could focus more on 2nd entry and helped the team.

[@AldricBenjie]

Jeremy > Jingggg noob

[@s2-railgun718]

@@AldricBenjie sure

[@houdinics2]

@@AldricBenjieI’m pinoy but I ain’t that delusional, Jinggg literally gets copied by everyone

[@JohnDoe-gt3jr]

​@@AldricBenjie you're probably the reason why Filipinos get a bad rep when it comes to "Pinoy Pride"

[@cNed]

Nice video i appreciate your effort 👏

[@platoonval]

Holy it's him! Appreciate the comment and goodluck next season!!!

[@indrasyafei2304]

yowww, It's Cned. good luck next season Broo, even tho i root for other team but i cant ignore amazing talent like youu.

[@HappyVLR]

cned!!!!!

[@0blivianne]

I think Jinggg is also the most entertaining player to watch. He is the craziest player I've ever seen and it looks so fun to watch. I think no one can copy his playstyle

[@zadsazhad]

I would say smthg is pretty close to him. Watching them demolished others while doing crazy stuff were fun as heck

[@0blivianne]

@@zadsazhad yeah something is pretty close too and crazy fun but sometimes when i watch jinggg his movement is something else. it's always jinggg airlines and he's using raze not jett xD

[@ImPerkkk]

True! I think ppl confuse crazy aim/flicks with insanity playstyle. Jingg has crazy aim but his movement is what sets him apart. Sometimes is not a movement player so much, but has movement.@@0blivianne

[@bicarabaca]

jawgemo on raze is underrated

[@zmjjkk1]

@@ImPerkkk Ah yes PRX Sometimes, the crazy Russian Jett

[@lukyschmunzel1888]

It is kinda sad, that Jingg can't play in 2024😢😢

[@kiowaflyboy]

Is he taking a break? I thought Jingg was srraigjt up retiring

[@mr.miyagi9004]

@@kiowaflyboy hes gotta do military service. but he said he is 100 going to come back after. if hes not washed by then

[@Player-fg4ub]

he said he was going to pursue university after and probably leave the professional scene@@mr.miyagi9004

[@Lucaz99]

⁠@@mr.miyagi9004depends on how long is -Indonesia- Singapore’s obligatory military service, 1 year? 2 years? If it’s just one year I think he can get back to the top

[@meh9187]

its 2 years@@Lucaz99

[@Yo-ds1fh]

you shouldve done a stat of how much their deaths "decrease" their winrate with the same matric and subtracted it with the impact to show real impact. someone can get a lot of winning kills for their team but also a lot of losing deaths. for example if your team is up 5v4 and you die you make the round 20% more winnable for the other team, because you lose the advantage for your team and go from 70% chance to win to 50%.

[@platoonval]

Someone else commented this and I agree it would be good to include death stats as well! Certainly will look to do something of the sort in the future.

[@sturts1234]

dayym this would have been genuis

[@sohhyuna]

Yep. This was a huge discussion for Jingg in the APAC region considering he died first a lot

[@platoonval]

After thinking about it here's my response that I also posted in the thread but can't pin because I have to keep my sponsor up 😄: A lot of people have commented on considering deaths as impact lost into the last statistic and here are my thoughts on it after thinking for a bit: It's certainly a great point but the issue is that impact of a kill if traded does not become 0. In fact, many top players have the opinion that an entry who gets the first kill and dies is very valuable, because they took initiative, challenged space, gained info, and then started the chain of trades where your team is much more likely to come out on top. It's true that a kill that isn't traded is "worth more", but how much more? In the end it's better to just treat them all the same and let the statistics balance themselves out instead of applying an artificial value. What do I mean by balancing itself out? If you think about it, when you live later on into a match, you inherently will have the opportunity for more important kills. For example, if you kill every single player bringing the round from a 5v5 to a 5v0, you only earn 50% impact, but if you clutch a 1v1, you immediately gain 50% impact for winning. The statistic naturally balances out these situations.

[@tmoe_ow2523]

@@platoonvalyou should’ve atleast included in traded deaths then as a 4th statistic just to see who throws the most and the least.

[@justtofu]

The entirety of PRX (especially Jinggg and F0rsaken tho) is so god damn good!

[@Spicyyy832]

This duo is just sooooo impactful. I mean, Something is really good mechanically, but I think he lacks a bit of good decision making.

[@waytun9608]

@@Spicyyy832hmm idk about that, I seen games where jing usually the one to overheat more

[@maibigbutt3746]

@@Spicyyy832 Something's decision making is actually a lot better than Jinggg. Nothing against Jinggg, bt he is a more "tell me what to do, and I'll do it perfectly" kind of player. He's also one of the 3 players who calls mid rounds for the team(forsaken and davai being the other 2) In a few important series(Loud and EG upper Finals), Something was doing the mid-round calls for a few rounds. One of the notable ones being in Lotus map against Loud, where all of PRX flooding in through rotating doors into Viper ult and winning thrifty. He is a very intelligent player

[@Spicyyy832]

@@maibigbutt3746 yeah, actually Jinggg overheats a lot. You’re right, my friend. And I truly believe he’s (smth) quite intelligent (didn’t know about the mid round calls by him) The only thing is sometimes I don’t understand why he doing certain things, especially when oping.

[@Spicyyy832]

@@waytun9608 true that, Jinggg is a crazy dude.

[@KingQuetzal]

I'm only half way through the video and this already the best Valorant video I have ever watched. Could you imagine if these stats were tracked for everyone during every ranked match. Would be so helpful. Thanks for this video, seemed very difficult to make.

[@CoachKonpeki]

Amazing analysis!

[@Arjun-bt4ee]

hats off to you bro thats some heavy analysis and talks volumes about the hours you put in. You have me hooked

[@EnderKnightBG]

Can we take a moment to appreciate platoons incrdible effort to make this video, he litterally examined every single aspect and took carefull consideration of each and every detail. I just wanted to say thank you and keep up the Amazing work!

[@zeddex9862]

Already missing Jinggg for this year :(

[@tobiletsplay]

HES BACK

[@RH1NOTHEREAL]

jinggg was crazy in his individual performance, but like you said, teamwork is so important, and EG had such a stronger teamwork-based style of gameplay that unfortunately PRX just never stood a chance

[@divam_delusional_GE_fan]

they just lost the final match , dont forget they beat EG in semi's

[@RH1NOTHEREAL]

@@divam_delusional_GE_fan unfortunately their individual performances weren't what they needed to secure the championship, I'm sure they gave it their best tho

[@king_thanos_2116]

​@@divam_delusional_GE_fanEG were always better than PRX They should've won Upper finals if they didn't choke an 11-6 lead EG winning despite PRX having 2 map bans shows how insane they were

[@oscaka0073]

@@king_thanos_2116 EG is insanse , but fundamentally . PRX's weakness is their own style, they can't dominate a map with their hyper aggressive-ness as said by Alecks himself. Hence why it doesn't really matter as much even if they have a 2 map advantage . They even lost the 1st 2 maps against DRX in the Pacific Final . The next step towards their evolution is probably improving their pistols and truly hammer down a certain map to be their own like EG's Fracture.

[@asdfghj4163]

@@king_thanos_2116the map bans were never important. prx and eg are both bad at haven, so that ban was irrelevant, and prx fracture was arguably their best map, which they had to ban because eg’s was just better, so both teams were essentially even

[@eclyphh]

You deserve way more recognition for making such quality, in depth and high effort content, keep it up

[@maibigbutt3746]

Great video. Honestly super agree with the take that "best player" don't mean jack to win trophies. Although, my bias says Something becoming the most high impactful player next year.... Guy had a few shaky maps during his first LAN event, and I hope he can play to his maximum potential

[@Duskforge]

I really like what you're doing here and thought this was a great idea for a video! I've been watching you since that NRG video and I really think you've improved your game since then.

[@DbzVxteran]

i dont know if you currently have plans for this or not but a video like this as a yearly update on player statistics would be awesome!

[@ronlyon4645]

wow my man back up his answer with data and statistic like a scientist. nice work!

[@Bincone]

What a cool and well crafted video! Love how you bring factual statistics without making it monotuous. Pretty good!!

[@quemuraa]

it is really cool that aspas not being that important if doing bad or good reflexes on Loud's playstyle. Aspas goes first, he usually gets all the important kills, but if he doesn't, the other players can get the job done (also bc he is traded a lot)

[@DEVILONBOTHSHOULDERS]

that’s actually why i think he’s the most valuable player in the world every single round LOUD play is opened up by aspas in some way, either directly by frags or indirectly by the space he takes

[@crackjee9301]

He got traded😢

[@kristof7777]

​@@crackjee9301Lmao he did didnt he

[@coachewok]

Really interesting video brother. Well explained and appreciate all the effort that went into it. Keep it up man!

[@paulogarcia916]

Just wanted to say thank you for the wonderful research

[@saemi7246]

FNS watch this vid yesterday on twitch (check vods at 43:00). He skipped the stats and watched the conclusion. Picked alfajer, aspas, and Less as the hardest one to kill and the most impactful. He also chose alfa, leo, aspas, Less, demon1 as the best player. But any of the prx player can be on top 5, too. Thanks for the vid and hard work. I see alot of potential for some of the players. Next year is gonna be more fun!

[@sherryssj5]

Beautiful analysis!

[@MebiManga]

This is such a different way of analysing compared to just looking at stats off VLR. Great video!

[@jasongrace4200]

As a data analyst and an avid fan of Valorant Esports this video made me feel things ❤

[@majestictouches]

Great video! One thing I’d suggest considering is counting in the importance of getting a kill on a certain player, getting the first blood and etc. For example, LOUD lose 80%+ of rounds where Aspas dies first. This means that getting the first blood specifically on Aspas increases your chances of winning that specific round in a 5v4 scenario by more than 20%. Would be fun to look at those results and who knows, maybe even see a drastic change?

[@platoonval]

A lot of people have commented on considering deaths as impact lost into the last statistic and here are my thoughts on it after thinking for a bit: It's certainly a great point but the issue is that impact of a kill if traded does not become 0. In fact, many top players have the opinion that an entry who gets the first kill and dies is very valuable, because they took initiative, challenged space, gained info, and then started the chain of trades where your team is much more likely to come out on top. It's true that a kill that isn't traded is "worth more", but how much more? In the end it's better to just treat them all the same and let the statistics balance themselves out instead of applying an artificial value. What do I mean by balancing itself out? If you think about it, when you live later on into a match, you inherently will have the opportunity for more important kills. For example, if you kill every single player bringing the round from a 5v5 to a 5v0, you only earn 50% impact, but if you clutch a 1v1, you immediately gain 50% impact for winning. The statistic naturally balances out these situations.

[@agertar1084]

Appreciate the amazing quality and analysis done on the game and keeping me hooked even when I don't play the game anymore!

[@stevey.4990]

this is a good video, good analysis.. wow... so good to see a metrics based on data

[@umiloyayi]

this video and the data here are what the analytics guys salivate for. holy shit man, you did a great job. sadly, jingggg is on his way to retirement. though those other players you mentioned, including giants' cloud, are worth looking out for next season. cheers bro

[@Xtormie]

The last statistic was really interesting but i would've loved if you also did it the other way around and saw how much they decreased their chance of winning. Then added the two numbers together. Idk if u understood this cause im not good at explaining things:)

[@platoonval]

Do you mean based on their deaths?

[@platoonval]

Interesting ideas guys! I'll definitely look to do some more death-related stats in the future!

[@lukyschmunzel1888]

​@@platoonvalmaybe Assist would be also important. Idk

[@platoonval]

@@lukyschmunzel1888 Very true I originally wanted to include assists in the impact calculation but was not able to discern it from my data. Hopefully in the future!

[@sebaba001]

@@platoonvalI think adding up deaths is really important to level it out, mistakes lose rounds and are as important as good plays that win rounds. On top of that, teams with more rounds won in total may be skewing the data? From all the teams you analyzed you'd have to level it out to for example the highest common number. If a team won 340 rounds and lost 310, then analyzing 310 wins and losses would make sense. Otherwise a team that lost more as a whole may have lower percentage of 'round winning impact kills' across the board, and it depends on who they played against, etc.

[@1stike150]

such an insightful watch, keep up the incredible content seriously

[@Yang34Yang]

This video was so incredibly interesting and well made. Amazing work!

[@ilxZfps]

Really enjoyable video to watch! Very insightful and I can't imagine how much effort went into constructing your analysis! Definitely will continue to keep an eye out for similar videos of yours in my feed, thank you!!

[@gabriellucena6182]

congrats bro, that's an amazing data analysis

[@denzvlr]

This might be one of your best videos. This thought process is really good

[@yufuyoshimura5426]

Insane amount of work put into this video. I feel like many of these stats are even more impactful if you look at just a single team that played the same games. I think it would be a good way to actually analyze team styles and would be a major step in valorant analysis.

[@pinkrockettt]

Great video! Keep up the good work!

[@etakuya3480]

I feel like it's hard to implement and quantify this but the value being an IGL/not being one brings should in a way work as some little bonus points for them. Fantastic vid tho !

[@kdot4879]

Absurd content the amount of research put in this video is insane you have my subscription

[@Thunderjpg]

Nice video bro, cNed’s last stat is incredible when you think about that. It shows that he has the potential to be the best and be champion in a lot of tournaments but his team was holding him back 😢 hope he will do better in FUT

[@AutomobileV]

really appreciate the takeaway at the end of the video; it's easy to overlook the fact that your own impactful kills may directly deny potential "impact points" for the rest of your team.

[@yurax7454]

I love these videos, keep up the great work man!

[@paulagallemit]

This is so informative. Thank you

[@The_DorkLord]

I think this is very cool, and makes me want to get my hands on the data to mess around with it. I think that analysis does somewhat seem to undervalue utility. Since teams are pretty much static, it would be possible to explain a lot of the kills as being in large part from good utility. While capitalizing on the util is important, I think that the way the data is interpreted here over-emphasizes it. Generally the reason that Leo is brought up as the "best" is because he "makes the fewest mistakes". Even though Jingg and Aspas do great, the value of not using util at bad times and vise versa can be more impactful overall. I have no idea what the best way to measure would be, but perhaps also comparing each player's winrates in XvY scenarios against the average would be interesting. It would also provide some balance for the non-dive and non-contact roles against the first blood stats.

[@ayushdhasmana3509]

Such a wonderful analysis! Loved it! Great work Platoon! Can we get these statistics for TenZ as well though!?

[@platoonval]

I'll consider it as a future idea!

[@otakuoreo]

Even if all this data is public, it’s still extremely interesting to see you compile it all, give your opinion, and see how much I underestimated some players (Mostly just underestimated Jing)

[@platoonval]

I also underestimated Jinggg to be honest since he was never in any discussions but was pleasantly surprised when looking at the data myself!

[@resvoire5650]

if only prx win champions, everyone would think jingg is the best player in the world. EG winning doesn't do much for valorant, especially with that scummy org behind them

[@Zaptrap101]

same, I didn't know jing was this impactful

[@harshsolanki4207]

Insane depth in your analysis

[@zyladd6176]

Super good analysis, watched the whole thing

[@felidiez2001]

I would love to see this kind of stats automatized in some app about ranked games. Great job and great vid

[@EinfachNurNiclas]

What an amazing video you’ve made here thank you so much❤

[@cornhead6873]

Very good video, only stat i would maybe add are the actual first deaths, because the more important it is for you to stay alive the worse every first death gets

[@sonatine3266]

Def. a interesting take on the topic. I was actually thinking a lot about all this. In my eyes and after searching through like tons of statistics, one name always comes up in most important ratings: Leo. Dude can shoot, dude can clutch, he has a lot of impact on almost every game with kills, utils and assists, he's gaining a lot of info, anchoring like hell, delying the whole game or speeding it up when necessary - simply an insanely smart player and in my eyes the currently best one in the world.

[@syNvlrr]

wow. great video and i can tell you put in a lot of effort into it

[@potatoesandcarrotts]

very informative! also i will really miss jinggg next year 😩

[@tinminator8905]

Since CNed was this high in 2023 I am really curious on what his stats looked like in 2021, when he actually won Champs.

[@Lucaz99]

The fact cned was so impactful and yet Navi was so poor, doesn’t fill me with a lot of confidence for Navi 2024. Although their championship run under FPX in 2022 would also be interesting to analyze.

[@acesseu4991]

@@Lucaz99 they will be better this year for sure you could tell they didn't know how to play with CNed.

[@Jinx-iw6zb]

​@@Lucaz99as we know from eg, it's the team cohesion that matters more than single player impact. So maybe Navi would be better, we just have to wait and see.

[@Lucaz99]

@@Jinx-iw6zb that’s a good point. But even though EG didn’t have the best players, they still had really good individual players, good coordination AND Potter who scouted the entire team and was their coach. Only time will tell with Navi tho.

[@er3n_genes1s21]

@@Lucaz99 you can just tell that NAVI had role issues just like how NRG faced the issue this year. Ardiis being back stabilizes the role in the team and he can fix ange1's trolling sensation now

[@shelvinswag6538]

this project is so dope, im going to do something similar. Thanks for the analysis

[@wasabigamer9235]

This is a crazy amount of effort

[@evrnoobjr]

i think having 4 EG players at the bottom of the list at 7:53 shows just how consistent they are as a team. no one player has to hard carry their way through the games, and teamwork in this case really does wonders for EG edit: didnt go forward at all, just heard you mention it. oops lol

[@shanntok5786]

Great vid man!!

[@ChanelyandMooMoo]

platoon is really out here giving us a valorant scientific study for free 😭 amazing breakdown!!

[@eeeeeenzo]

I feel like the use of utility, which can't be quantified, is what make "valorant best player" debate actually pointless. If there was a way to calculate statistics of for example "how the use of utility helps to win rounds for the team, per player" and have like "weighted averages" considering utility is used different regarding team roles (duelist/initiators/sentinels), it would give a sense of a complete comparison between players, not just regarding kills or death. That's why for me, Leo is top 5: His usage of utility is second to none in my opinion As you said in the video "the best team will always triumph over the best player" and that is what makes valorant, valorant. Phenomenal work!

[@EX24file8EXTERMINATE]

Feels bad for cNed with how much navi did him dirty. The team single handedly ruined his year.

[@yunasayonara]

One of the best video i seen, glad to see a real data based about in game stats, and rly interesting stats btw, i knew about Cned (even tho i paused for 20s lol) but i felt like he always had such a big impact. This top 4 is kinda logic but i guess it can depend based on team performance as well, if you lose you have more chance to have negative kd. And just wondering if u knew what is the best between display scaling and gpu scaling in nividia?

[@andrevicenzi7983]

Amazing video bro, congrats

[@dhirajkadam2469]

great video man, well done

[@joshuajabur7829]

great video and extremely interesting. also points out who you should watch if you want to improve

[@randodox8375]

Interesting analysis man

[@parthpatel9602]

The first statistics shows the strategy aswell, demon1 was plugged into an already existing team, but loud had strategies arounf aspas entering and going nuclear.

[@Hello-wo4sx]

I'd be super interested to see a death counterpart to the last statistic. that is largely weighted toward duelists because they take the most first engagements and second in because they can trade and bring it back to even, neutralizing the advantage, however those players are also far more likely to give up the advantage to the other team. one of the reasons leo is so good is because he is almost never first dead, and contributes the least advantage to the other team by dying, regardless of the advantage he gains for the team. If you had a statistic that weighed these against each other that would probably be the most indicative statistic of a players value i can think of and i'd be shocked if yay 2022 didnt top this list by a mile. great video though! i love these types of complex number analysis videos for digging up more information than is obvious!

[@amolsawarkar4928]

Kudos to the hardwork !!! ❤

[@olldi6000]

That's such an amazing video, doesn't get the hype it deserves

[@sh1nenkai258]

bro ive seen many people try play like jinggg and fail miserably, i tried myself and i am a bot, but when i play like a suygetsu or leo or a chronicle style which is more supportive or even a yay style where he isnt as aggressive as a jinggg, i peform better its really shows jinggg is a one of a kind player, to be that impactful whilst playing an almost forsure geturself killed style sad he wont be there for paper rex 2024, its going to leave a huge gap for monyet to fill and others to also fill (i think something will improve since this was his rookie year)

[@rakitin-pcbuilder8332]

this is what expected when someone say hisself "Thinking Valorant". Thank you for the great work, hope see it more in future

[@MadeForD]

i love that in almost every graph there's that 'yay in 2022' that pops up. bro was like Jordan in his prime

[@chaninsaekhao94]

Great content👍

[@firework8140]

I cant imagine the amount of research to make this video I do think agent pick also determine how good a player can be. The hardest thing to quantify and notice is utility usage

[@itsamethyst_]

Good analysis, my friend.

[@kimo0306]

these stats show who is the best player for the team they play on. like the most perfectly fitted player to a teams playstyle

[@kieieiee9343]

i would like to see the same analysis for masters 2 and champs in 2022 and masters 3 and champs in 2021, want to see if things like 16 kills per map and other stats work the same way

[@alexlim3636]

Goated vid thx for the work

[@NerdChannelBrasil]

Cauanzin stats is very impressive, probably one of the most underrated players today.

[@dexq1k]

forsaken jingg and something r my personal favourites mainly because their agressive playstyle players dont get me wrong leo derke ect are nuts aswell but in terms of entertainment factor prx just takes the cake fnatic be just showing up to win which is respectable i would aswell in there shoes, also the versitility on prx is nuts which is why i think their so consitant 2 2nds in a row is rough

[@Negativeduelist]

Eg didn’t need one player that’s why they did so good each member had enough value to be great but not too much to be needed

[@Fu7uristic]

ayy yooo! Who's that sexy man with that patchy-ass beard in the 3rd row @ 11:26 ?...LOL, but frfr a Great video, Platoon! I always enjoy watching your more in-depth breakdowns on strategies/playstyles that most players don't see while they are watching cuz of their lack of high-level in-game knowledge. Keep up the great work!

[@disillusi0n.]

great video fam 👏🏽

[@oisin2696]

While the video is very interesting I do feel like a lot of important statistics can't be calculated in a good way, to name a few: Bringing a 1v5 to a lost 1v2 might not win you a round, but could be massive depending on the economy and clutching a pistol round probably leads to another round win. Another important statistic is utility, kills might win you rounds, but good utility gives kills. And then there are the two that I feel are the least talked about but also most important, shot calling and mentality, shot callers are the core of the team, and staying calm under pressure is in my opinion the most important skill.

[@zFrizzi]

Another player I think is up there is F0rsaken, he's almost always near the top the of the scoreboard and can play pretty much any agent his team needs him to.

[@uglyboyadam9762]

I wanted to ask if you considered contexts such as attack vs defense when calculating these statistics, and if you think they matter. I know many pros would say a 4v4 isn’t necessarily 50/50 and that it’s more advantageous to attackers. Great video by the way🤝

[@platoonval]

That's definitely something I considered and certain stats are definitely different depending on what side you're playing. For the impact specifically I wanted a generalized value so I didn't necessarily put it into the calculation, but like you said it should be something we at least take into account!

[@dhrumils]

Insanely cool video!!

[@nervz]

Big asterisk on best fighter in the world. The stats are all about kills and trades, etc. really hard to see behind the scenes on who has impact in terms of comms and other stats that aren’t measurable

[@platoonval]

For sure there will always be things we can't measure but one step at a time we strive to get closer to the truth!

[@pedrohenrique1960]

what awesome video, bro! I believe that any top4 team in champs could won the tournament!

[@flaviolfernandes]

nice content!

[@kylezimmerman7358]

Good video!

[@bennyg2086]

When im watching a movie and a character says "if we have better teamwork, we can beat players better then us" ill stop rolling my eyes cause this vid actually proved it WTH

[@tmoe_ow2523]

Please look at yays player impact on C9 I wanna see if he really was the problem (I understand they had role and contract issues too so it wasn’t fair for him since the start)

[@flynch4358]

Damn, I liked this video

[@cheilin2220]

It would pretty cool if you could this do something similar for 2022 Gamechangers (Or 2023 even)

[@ayp1x307]

Common W video from platoonval

[@Oc10_]

I think the value of Leo isn't really shown in this video. The first stat is quite misleading as Leo has one of the Lowest death ratios in all of VCT, including FD ratio. On top of this Leo's KAST is ridiculously high, meaning when he dies he has done at least some impact in almost every round. This is something not highlighted here at all as not dying in a round or only dying when necessary is not valued. On top of that Leo is rarely someone to completely pop off in a game, the only times he's really needed to is in game which Fnatic are struggling, the value of Leo comes in his ability to not only set up his teammates, but also consistently do so, as he rarely dies. On top of this because of your statistics getting FKs is really important, but what this means is that you will commonly overvalue duelists, as you never even look into the assists at all. Something like FK assists is also extremely important then as, especially in pro play, an assist can be the only reason that kill every even happened, like if a player is revealed behind a wall, stunned or flashed. I just think alot of these stats don't highlight the positives of a player like Leo, as alot of the stats you looked at doesn't consider quantity at all, as f.ex the amount of round where Leo dies first for Fnatic is so ridiculously low