This was extremely helpful. Could you do more chemistry questions based on geology and geosciences in future? Thats the degree I am doing and would be super helpful. Love your way of explaining. Thanks again
@zopadawibur Жыл бұрын
Very clear explaination..you are the best teacher i have ever known....big big salute!!!
@ShanDRealest4 жыл бұрын
Great aid in my pursuit of General Chemistry 2. Thanks so much 👍
@galacticnomad734 Жыл бұрын
I'm just lost on why you would add the cathode and anode when the formula is Ecathode - Eanode = Ecell.
@bobbob-in1ml3 ай бұрын
Ecell = Ecathode - Eanode when they're both reduction potentials *If the cathode is reduction potential, while the anode is oxidation potential, you can just add them up (you normally subtract anode because you're trying to turn a given reduction potential to an oxidation potential)
@josecarlosdelgadomalave23536 жыл бұрын
When studying corrosion, I have found from many authors (and I teacher I had) that the sign in the equation is (+) not (-) and Q equals to the cations concentration. Could you explain this for me please? Is driving me crazy not knowing which sign should I use in the equation. It depends on what?
@qazi__chemist43003 жыл бұрын
Sir why we use nernst equation to determine non standerd electrode potential?why we not determine electrod potential without nernst equation like Standerd elecytode potential.
@aliotako16474 жыл бұрын
You like god of chimestry man... From iraq i'm following you....
@bensonndendya95566 жыл бұрын
You helped me some how God bless you
@abhishekranjan39414 жыл бұрын
I hope he could, but he doesn't exist.
@mdalkarim19977 жыл бұрын
E0=Ecathode-Eannode E0=0.34-0.76
@abhijit25753 жыл бұрын
Very helpful sir
@benjaminmangip70313 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@manaralhindawi29606 жыл бұрын
Does anyone knows which program is used for making this video? I mean the whole drawing thing...thank you
@songsart94366 жыл бұрын
Why can't we use nersnt eq for electrolytic cell?
@abigailgoff9 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't Q=(products to the power of their coefficients)/(reactants to the power of their coefficients?)
@abigailgoff9 жыл бұрын
+Abigail Goff Kind of like you would in equilibria?
@Masrur1119 жыл бұрын
+Abigail Goff "Q" is called 'the reaction quotient' and "K" is called 'the equilibrium constant'. They are both calculated in the same way. Q or K = the ratio of the concentration of the products and the reactants of a reversible reaction. Second brackets [ ] are used to show concentration(usually molar concentration) of something. Molar concentration=moles/volume. There is deference between Q and K. Both are ratios of the same things, but calculated at different phases of a reaction. K is during equilibrium. That means, at equilibrium, Q=K But at other times, QK and this gives the direction of that reaction. If left untouched any reversible reaction will achieve equilibrium over time. Q(also K) is thermodynamically related to Free Energy, G. G is also related to Electric Potential Difference or Voltage. Hence the video.
@TravelWithTea89 жыл бұрын
+Mostafa Al-Quadir Can I calculate Pressure and Concrentration in the same equation for Q?
@Masrur1119 жыл бұрын
+Top 10s The reaction quotient (Q) is a measure of the relative amounts of reactants and products during a chemical reaction at a given point in time. or simply ratio of [product] to [reactant]. If a product/reactant is dissolved in aqueous solution, we use concentrations for all of them. If all reactants/products are gaseous we use partial pressures to calculate Q. Can we use Pressures and concentrations in a single equation to solve Q? The answer is yes. But we will need to convert Pressure to concentration and vice-versa as we need. We know concentration [ ]=moles/liters =n/V. We also know PV = nRT. So, P = CRT. This is the equation for conversion. Hope that answers the question. Note: We don't include solids & liquids in the calculations, only aqueous and gaseous.
@TravelWithTea89 жыл бұрын
+Mostafa Al-Quadir Do you know if it's a minus or pluss sign in Nernst Equation?
@erikaso75847 жыл бұрын
As I know the E° of Zn is -0.76 not +0.76 !
@sabrinaakababrina7 жыл бұрын
since zn is being oxidized in this case you have to change the + to a -
@sabrinaakababrina7 жыл бұрын
sorry i mean the - to a +
@preciousmwenda2 жыл бұрын
Is k and Q calculated in the same way?
@EboniseStBrice4 жыл бұрын
Someone please HELP!! 1) Where did 0.0592 come from? 2) Why is “n” 2 and not 4...what if electrons gained from Copper was 3 and electrons lost from Zinc was 1, then what would the new n be? PLEASE HELP 😇
@abhishekranjan39414 жыл бұрын
0.0592 is the value derived by putting the values of constants in the equation.
@abhishekranjan39414 жыл бұрын
Cause 2 moles of electrons are transferred in the reaction. And i didn't understand that 2nd one :)
@abrarabdulrahman59074 жыл бұрын
Thank you.........you deserve more than a million subscribers ^_^
@frankvalenti83506 жыл бұрын
Amazing video
@이동기-s8t6 жыл бұрын
Can we use deltaGnaught=-nFEnaught with nernst ?
@liamjarrett29992 жыл бұрын
why do you use log instead of ln
@ramyaathreya83288 жыл бұрын
can u please teach chemical kinetics. plzz
@kevindave2778 жыл бұрын
Thanks man.. HELPED ME.. Khan academy aka "subscribed" :)
@ravindersinghbedi59998 жыл бұрын
In some books, the formula given is: E=E°- (2.303×RT/nf)*ln([oxidation]/[reduction]) Can some one tell me what is the 'f' given in this equation.
@shaboom8128 жыл бұрын
+Ravinder singh Bedi "F" is Faraday's constant, 9.648 533 99(24)×104 C mol−1
@Popereggie19938 жыл бұрын
+Ravinder singh Bedi Faraday's constant
@krantidekate64908 жыл бұрын
That is Faraday's constant. f=96500 C
@ahmadsyahmiadnan92799 жыл бұрын
is it K =K(w) for the equilibrium constant?
@Crunchyape9 жыл бұрын
You have the ecell wrong, you just added the ered and eox but you are supposed to subtract them. e(cell)=e(red)-e(ox)
@kalyanpamidimukkala93529 жыл бұрын
+Crunchyape e(ox) is actually -0.76 so it adds up to 1.10v
@AzerothLatinoamerica9 жыл бұрын
+Pamadimukkala Kalyan Yeah but that part inst in the video, someone new may find this confusing
@amreshverma57479 жыл бұрын
+Crunchyape we are generally given reduction potential. the formula you've given need be corrected.
@amanrayeen82178 жыл бұрын
We only subtract when both of the potentials are reduction. e red ( cathode ) - e red ( anode ) is correct. Also, e red ( cathode ) + e ox ( anode ) will give the same value.
@maurits002226 жыл бұрын
isnt it Ln Q instead of log Q?
@williamnathanael4123 жыл бұрын
it's base 10 logarithm. The natural log is taken care of in the 0.0592
@mustafagoncu94887 жыл бұрын
Hocam çok iyi anlatıyorsunuz yarın yazılım var iyi bir not alırım inşallah
@menzigcabashe3297 жыл бұрын
hi good work
@padura67484 жыл бұрын
this tutorial' standard values (+/-) are incorrect,please correct it
@tseliot52949 жыл бұрын
In school we use a bit of a different formula: E=E(zero)+ 0.0592/n * log((c(ox)/c(red)). And by using that, i get 1,1295 instead of 1,07. I can´t find my mistake and the formula is correct too, according to my textbook. could someone help me out?
@xiaowenxu15056 жыл бұрын
firstly,the number of significant figures is wrong,and it should be - not +,you just mistook the sign.Hope you have found it out.
@gauravganesh20079 ай бұрын
hi
@yeefeitan51869 жыл бұрын
how did u get 0.0592 V? :o
@permanentlyUnimpressed8 жыл бұрын
using the gas constant, Faraday's constant and standard temp 25 degrees in the same formula to replace R,T and F in E=Ecell- Rt÷nf*lnQ leaving E =Ecell- 0.059÷n*logQ do all the necessary transposition
@wooze857 жыл бұрын
(8.3145*298K)/96485 does not equal 0.059.. what am i missing?
@sabrinaakababrina7 жыл бұрын
its a different equation, the one with 0,059 is used when the temperature is 25C the other one with RT/nF is used when the temperature is different than 25C
@sparrowspirit53014 жыл бұрын
@@wooze85 Your missing 2.303, multiply with the answer and u get 0.059 :)
@keyakhurana40413 жыл бұрын
the product of gas constant and 298 kelvin and division by faradays number gives you 0.059.
@jazminsutcliff41067 жыл бұрын
Can somebody help me? When I use ln(10/1) in the main formula, E=1,04 ; why do we change log for the ln shown in the previous video? I'm lost D:
@xiaowenxu15056 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you still need help.I hope you are already clear about that.Yes,in the previous video,we use ln to calculate cell potential.When T is equal to 298.15 K (RT/F = 0.025693 V), we switch from ln to log (ln Q = 2.3026 log Q) to get 0.0592 in the nernst equation
@environmentalconservation51064 жыл бұрын
In=2.303log
@kentkeatha67286 жыл бұрын
What is -nFE??
@serpilserpil52034 жыл бұрын
Turkcesini yapamiyorum ingilizcesinden anlarim belki dedim #yks
@zishanismam8098 жыл бұрын
what happens if I get a nagetive answer?
@andyschang58907 жыл бұрын
zishan ismam negative potential means you are past the equilibrium point
@juanjzavala6 жыл бұрын
switch cathode and anode, u have them opposite
@jinslukose17954 жыл бұрын
uffffff.......
@travisli46865 жыл бұрын
sound volum are too low, without earphone i cannot hear.
@kodlaralemi11418 жыл бұрын
abi çok iyi yaa
@lauramaimarketing8 жыл бұрын
i freaking hate this class why am i here fml
@hans33310008 жыл бұрын
i sometimes have this feeling, it's weird, like being in a small cage inside a lion enclosure or shark cage, it's kind of fun knowing you're never really in any danger. it's almost exciting, and kind of a satisfying feeling. just the feeling of being glad you're never going to be in that position for real. same with math, we are all done this nightmare of chem, but every once in a while we go back and remember the hell we went through, knowing it's never gonna hurt us again. that was weird, probably did'nt answer the question