You made it more understandable than my teacher did.
@USLawEssentials7 жыл бұрын
Thanks! You might like this video on general and specific jurisdiction: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJbKf5aHqbOfjNE More here: uslawessentials.com
@joshwitherspoon42107 жыл бұрын
You are the best...studying for the bar is difficult. You successfully give practicality to what just looks like rules to me. I'm watching these vids even for concepts that I already know well. Thank you
@USLawEssentials7 жыл бұрын
Thanks, you might like this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJbKf5aHqbOfjNE More at uslawessentials.com
@Spark-In-The-Dark6 жыл бұрын
Josh Witherspoon maybe you can do some good though. Infiltrate it and the expose it from the inside. I’m pretty sure everybody realizes at this point that the so called “justice system“ is about as unjust as possible. Ridiculous amount of people incarcerated for victimless “crimes” and police officers have quotas. People with life sentences marijuana! Fines for things like grass not being cut and fishing with the license… The ridiculousness is beyond recognizable and people are tired of it I am not going to stand for it much longer in my opinion. It all originates at the federal reserve and actually have a bank of international settlements. That’s why court rooms are merchants. The shit can’t go much longer
@Otis-Tank Жыл бұрын
Go take that oath and lose your naturalization. 8 USC 1481. You will become a British agent swearing allegiance to foreign corporation. You are an enemy of the people. We don't like your type especially when am jur tells us your duty is to the courtroom and only the client last. Nobody needs your to attorn their property. Good luck agent
@pauljuliangould49014 жыл бұрын
What I find most fascinating is that the attorney narrating the video was the actor who portrayed The Traveler in 2 episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Eric Menyuk. Mr. Menyuk left the acting profession and became a practicing attorney in California. (I was a radio old radio and TV broadcaster, back in another period of life, while now pursuing a degree in Paralegal Studies... I can recognize voices quite well... )
@DavidMichaelsTM2 жыл бұрын
This video is out of date. The minimum contacts test is no longer the test for personal jurisdiction. See the 2021 decisions in Ford v Montana (scotus) and Hepp v Facebook 2 (3rd Cir)
@bryonwatkins14325 жыл бұрын
The court has to, like many other words and terms, has to define “minimum.” Does that mean visiting the state under five times within a year? What?
@sheetalgowrea91083 ай бұрын
Do yu have the video on specific and minimum contacts please?
@le555116 жыл бұрын
This video is very efficient and so easy gasp. Thank you
@patrickgoodwin42554 жыл бұрын
*gasp*
@AntiMasonic935 жыл бұрын
Learned more from you than my civil procedure professor.
@USLawEssentials5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words. I offer tutoring for law school students including exam prep in case you are interested daniel at uslawessentials.com uslawessentials.com
@mikejones9961 Жыл бұрын
were you hungover?
@hyojinlee3 жыл бұрын
This is great, thank you so much!
@ChrisChinDuh2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!!
@thanuvijay51092 жыл бұрын
make super easy to understand Thanks a lot
@hyojinlee3 жыл бұрын
Watching it for the third time :) Thanks again!
@remimichaelapebo5 жыл бұрын
thanks for your help
@ntumbam18285 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I now understand
@respectamerica2382 Жыл бұрын
Nobody ever ask the question, what if I'm not a resident of any State? How is residency establish? Show me the Law, that says, I have to be a resident of a State?
@USLawEssentials Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching. It's a fairly common question - - supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/826/ Tricky question, green card holders: law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/18-3189/18-3189-2020-02-27.html Residency biz entities: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1332 (c); helpful recent SCOTUS case: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-368_febh.pdf vid:kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmfXqYWkl6ugg80 www.britannica.com/science/Dunning-Kruger-effect
@smooveking7733 жыл бұрын
what if a contract was made at a bank but the banks head quarter are out of state? is that minimum or no contact?
@PANTYEATR16 жыл бұрын
so, it has to be minimum contacts with the geographic state and not the individual within the state? i would think the minimum contact with a individual within a state would mean minimum contacting the state in order to reach the individual...😕 thanks
@Patrick-bo9us4 жыл бұрын
Would it not be easier for the person suing to go to the state where the person being sued resides, to go through with the action of suing, in lieu of minimum contacts?
@USLawEssentials4 жыл бұрын
Patrick, that's a good point and sometimes it does make sense to sue in the defendant's home state. However, there are other factors. For example, plaintiff might prefer to sue in a state where she resides for her convenience. Also, the place where the incident occurred might be the most logical place for the litigation to occur.
@respectamerica2382 Жыл бұрын
This also applies to Criminal Law too! Everthing under the 14th Amemdment is Civil Law.
@USLawEssentials Жыл бұрын
Jurisdictional requirements in criminal cases are different.
@vengeance2825 Жыл бұрын
How is personal jurisdiction obtained when there is no injured party?
@respectamerica2382 Жыл бұрын
They can't !There must be an" injury in fact!"
@respectamerica2382 Жыл бұрын
Defenders of Wildlife v Lujan
@exhalesolutions8 жыл бұрын
Nicely done.
@atm15608 жыл бұрын
To have minimum contact : 1st, the non-resident D must have been purposeful availment him product / service in the forum state & foreseeable that he may haled into the forum court. 2nd, D also have obtained benefits & protections of the forum state (ie. using the roads, channels). 3rd, the court must provide give non-resident D fair & substantial justice in the forum state.
@joewger9 жыл бұрын
In the first part of this video can Patty sue David? Will she have travel to a NJ court to sue him there?
@USLawEssentials9 жыл бұрын
joewger You understand Patty's problem. Yes, she can sue David, but she might have to sue him in NJ or MA. Her preferred court in NY is likely unavailable to her because NY lacks personal jurisdiction.
@connorq27276 жыл бұрын
Where could David be sued in the first example involving the accident in MA?
@mjenkinsday5 жыл бұрын
Possibly in MA because he did travel to the "State of MA" but it would have to be from the "state" because party couldn't sue either because she made minimal contact by traveling to MA as well. The " State" may be able to exercise personum jurisdiction over both David and Patty.
@johncokos98495 жыл бұрын
Does Log Arm apply to both Civil AND Criminal ?
@USLawEssentials5 жыл бұрын
Personal jurisdiction is different in criminal and civil cases. Long arm jurisdiction - - or personal jurisdiction over non-domiciliaries - - is relevant in civil cases. Criminal cases have different rules.
@johncokos98495 жыл бұрын
@@USLawEssentials If I chose to go the ceriminal route, what are the elements that I need to be aware of ?
@USLawEssentials5 жыл бұрын
I cannot give legal advice. Please consult with an attorney in your state.
@chriscockrell94954 жыл бұрын
minimum contacts prevents or validates long arm personal jurisdiction to apply or not.