The USS Radford was sunk off the coast of Delaware to create an artificial reef.
Пікірлер: 89
@GShileikis4 жыл бұрын
Two of my the ships ended up the same way, USS Dewey and the USS Jouett. Great ships, may they continue to serve in their new roles.
@MrChickennugget3602 жыл бұрын
technically museum ships. just low maintenance ones that are hard to get to.
@davidperry9707 жыл бұрын
Remembering when all the Spruance class cans were the new cans in the fleet. Dam I'm getting old. USS Halsey CG-23 80-83.
@daved42155 жыл бұрын
80 to 84 on Joey D C G 27
@GShileikis4 жыл бұрын
USS England (DLG/CG-22)1973-78, USS Dewey (DDG-45) 1981-84, USS Jouett (CG-29) 1991-1993.
@tomc2363 жыл бұрын
USS Gridley CG-21, 1983-84. When I separated in 1988 the Arleigh Burke was still on the drawing board.
@heatherbrown16367 жыл бұрын
David M. Daigle I served on the ship from 83 to 86 and lived in Norfolk, VA this was quite interesting to see.
@McZachary448 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how much of the superstructure is already gone from when it was decommissioned.
@Neonbiker Жыл бұрын
Probably reused on another ship or put in museum
@loyalrammy3 жыл бұрын
So sad. These ships had another 20 years at least because they were not that old. They destroyed my ship too (USS Fletcher)
@MadLudwig3 жыл бұрын
I was stationed at Fort Monroe, VA and remember watching her come into Norfolk after being hit on starboard bow by a Kuwaiti freighter. There was a huge "V" shaped gash in the bow that extended below the waterline and the forward gun mount was knocked askew.
@Boothrat5 жыл бұрын
At least she wasn't cut up for scrap. I never served on a spruance class destroyer, but I agree they were the best looking destroyers
@michaelbilodeau27709 жыл бұрын
Very last of the Spruance class, best looking destroyers ever built now resting in Davy Jones Locker.
@Liamflynnphoto8 жыл бұрын
Personally I believe the Arleigh Burke Class are the best looking. But hey everyone has their own opinion. Unless your a liberal or a feminist then everyone must have the same opinion as you.
@michaelbilodeau27708 жыл бұрын
Not a liberal. not a feminist, I do believe in everybody opinion, yes Arleigh Burke are cool looking, American destroyers are usually good looking ships in general
@fallstiger756 жыл бұрын
Gearings were the best platform, lasted over 50 years, domestic and foreign service
@daved42155 жыл бұрын
Loved those Spru-cans.
@Semajsenrab723 жыл бұрын
@@fallstiger75 Charles F Adams class served in 4 Navies for nearly 45 years
@fredwinter74114 жыл бұрын
I can clearly see that a whole lot of people posting 'rebuffs' do not have a clue what goes on when a ship like this is sunk. People sport dive on; it's the start of an underwater break for waves and it's mainly done by donations and fund raising. It appears that a lot of people did not understand that. That sunk ship will outlast all of us and two or three more generations before it's completely wasted. For the short of thought, that's called a legacy.
@timpetta29742 ай бұрын
Yes, a whole lot of people are “clueless” because they have an opinion. The ship should have served another 20 years, then scrapped or sunk as a target. Waste of money to turn her into a reef.
@panoramix31923 жыл бұрын
I will never understand why people cheer and clap watching this.
@6120mcghee3 жыл бұрын
It felt like part of my life was amputated.
@frankmiller952 жыл бұрын
The sinking of a ship is literally a death, and nothing to be celebrated, later benefits notwithstanding.
@deafmusician28 жыл бұрын
still feel bad seeing one of our ships go down tho.
@gremio32933 жыл бұрын
Well I still think its better then scrapping it...its now a home to the fishies
@6120mcghee3 жыл бұрын
I was on Her. 91-93. Awful command back then. Got better. Best Destroyer ever!!!
@reign1144 жыл бұрын
Deployed with the Radford to the Persian Gulf Feb-Aug 1985.
@LuciensMusic3 жыл бұрын
My old ship(USS C F Adams) is being scrapped right now. I'm sad it wasn't turned into a museum, its gone now...
@Semajsenrab723 жыл бұрын
I was on HMAS Perth II, we had 3 CFA modified, then bought Goldsborough as spares, still can't watch Perth be scuttled nearly in complete tact as a dive reef
@stephenhoward68292 жыл бұрын
I understand. All but 2 of the 6 ships I was on have been decomm'd and scrapped. It happens, but it tugs on heartstrings.
@kirkmorrison6131 Жыл бұрын
The stripping of these ships hurts as badly as seeing them towed to the Breakers. I remember seeing them coming into the Bay
@michaelbilodeau27709 жыл бұрын
Then again my mistake, we still have the Paul F. Foster DD-964
@ellisbaldwin93162 жыл бұрын
I was on this ship from 1980 till 1982
@minuteman048 Жыл бұрын
That was one of our sister ships. I was on the Caron DD 970. Sad
@bigdumbhick9 жыл бұрын
rode her from 82-86
@bruceradfordsorrywronghous5344 жыл бұрын
Awesome thanks!
@timmayer87235 жыл бұрын
Don't know why there is any question that using these hulks for artificial reefs is an excellent use of these war relics.
@stefaneer9120 Жыл бұрын
Sink ships make reefs.
@duchebag30632 жыл бұрын
OSSA-OS2 82-85 My first Ship!
@lanniemoore53675 жыл бұрын
I thought we sold the USS Radford 446 to Japan for scrap metal use . Howd we get it back? I served on this ship in the late 1960's .
@patrickg61635 жыл бұрын
This ship is the USS Arthur W Radford 968, not the USS Radford 446
@picturemetrollin20933 жыл бұрын
I live in Radford, lol, I’ve seen pictures of the USS Radford 446 at the courthouse. She was a destroyer escort wasn’t she?
@geraldschilli887011 ай бұрын
The ship was 563 feet long, not 536 feet long.
@ache77723 жыл бұрын
👍👏 for the Nature !!
@TheDanno2488 жыл бұрын
Served 80-85
@sr6336 жыл бұрын
What would happen if a sailor called his ship a "boat" ? lol
@daved42155 жыл бұрын
The X O would bitch a fit.
@smytb4 жыл бұрын
That's ok, we did it all the time!
@chrisb99603 жыл бұрын
USS Radford is scuttled. Fixed it for you.
@zackkasey9 жыл бұрын
Was on her from '99 to '03. Good riddance. HT2 Rayburn aka Banger
@nicholasmaude69068 жыл бұрын
Did they have to vandalise the ship's superstructure.
@Neonbiker Жыл бұрын
They have to cut holes in the ship so it sinks evenly
@josephjackson72692 жыл бұрын
Barely still looks like a ship.
@dima.jiharev6 жыл бұрын
0:18 Why paint out the name?
@pby10007 жыл бұрын
Wait! I forgot my hammer!
@wayneellis1565 Жыл бұрын
How deep?
@tedbaker82914 жыл бұрын
Woefully insufficient footage of the sinking itself. The ship was 60+% submerged before the sinking footage started, the shot was too tight, and the view was fixed on the CG boat. Just not very exciting as sinking videos go.
@MrUranium2384 жыл бұрын
no cameras inside of her???
@dogeboy08877 жыл бұрын
They Wanted The Ship To Sink!?!?!?
@eaterofclams4 жыл бұрын
...you are very observant...perhaps a career in the CIA would be a good option.
@smytb4 жыл бұрын
That's for divers to access to the insides safely, so no one gets trapped inside.
@popajoel3 жыл бұрын
nous irons chercher l'epave pour recuperer l'acier que nous n'aurons plus en 2100.
@timsering99644 жыл бұрын
Why arent they recycling.the scrap steel, instead of polluting the waters
@saulurias054 жыл бұрын
The ships are cleaned out before they are sunk, that way they can become artificial reefs for marine life
@cyninhoustonf.d12198 жыл бұрын
they made a video of it sinking (freaked me out)n they made this one did they make one of it like a diver under water recording it go down....
@APerson-rx8uv8 жыл бұрын
Skip to 2:47 to pass the history lesson
@roadweary52523 жыл бұрын
A Person no thanks, I like the history lesson.
@ralphe58423 жыл бұрын
USS misfit I remember when it collided with a container ship looked like a cannonball went threw the bow below the waterline.before she was not certified for action for many years just sat at the pier and then collided with the ship first time out cost the new trouble shooting captan his job (he couldn't fix it) known as a ship of fools it had a covered array made it look as if it was giving the finger
@user-hb4wq9ec1h3 жыл бұрын
바다오염과지구에멸망은다가온다게으르고,게으른.인간들에의해서
@HighwayBull6 жыл бұрын
They should have recycled the steel from that ship instead of littering the bottom of the ocean for an artificial reef.
@deannelson95655 жыл бұрын
Why it's not like we're even remotely running low on steal things damn near worthless. That's far better as a reff then it is as some recycled scrap Heap.
@Hellndegenerates Жыл бұрын
All professional, until it comes to rubbish filming an historic moment.
@scottyb685 жыл бұрын
Cant repurpose the hull to become a new ship? It would trim some money for a new ship budget. Tax payers money so screw it I guess.
@Neonbiker Жыл бұрын
They say it’s to expensive and the ship is to old
@donalfinn42054 жыл бұрын
Artificial reef = dumping ground. No matter how you dress it up.
@PhilJonesIII4 жыл бұрын
It costs a lot more to prepare a ship for reefing and they are sunk in places that are mostly devoid of life. Once sunk, they get colonized rapidly with a wide range of aquatic life. In a few years, the ship becomes barely recognizable as a ship. The larger part of the oceans floors are like a desert. That is their natural state. The regulations are quite strict when it comes to what can and cannot be sunk. The rejected material has to be disposed of correctly and safely. The alternative is to have it towed to some Asian site where they strip the ship and dump all the waste, including oil and other toxic material, into the ocean.
@donalfinn42054 жыл бұрын
Philip Jones Thank you for your reply but I don’t buy it. If you dump a bag of rubbish in a ditch, it doesn’t be long being covered over and made use of by the local natural life. Very same thing. Ships were never dumped like that before. I’m not convinced by your argument at all. It’s just dumping by another name. Pure and simple.
@floppychzcake79364 жыл бұрын
@@donalfinn4205 Your ignorance and stupidity amazes me, you have no clue what is actually happening here. Do you think the EPA would allow this if it was harmful at all? There's a difference in creating a reef and putting a plastic bag in a ditch.