Thanks for the video!! I powered up the UXG Lite and connected the lan port to the my network. Plugged the UXG and connected . I saw that the UXG was recognized . Then I removed the USG with the app, plugged the wan connection into the UXG and then adopted the UXG with via the UniFi app. Easy peasy!! I immediately notice that my web pages opened faster. I ask my wife who did not know what I was doing and she said that she noticed that the web pages loaded much faster. Way to go Ubiquiti!!!
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
That’s great to hear! Ya it’s a much faster device than the USG
@hornetbad9 ай бұрын
Low energy consumption, small size, and from a reputable company. I will definitely buy it. Thanks for the video
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
You made a mistake, there is no such thing as reputable company when you speak about Ubiquiti.
@kimpedersen9 ай бұрын
Correction - it is available in Europe. I've ordered mine and its on its way :) #Sweden
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Oh cool! It wasn’t the other day when I checked :)
@user-ow5wp7yp4t9 ай бұрын
My is up and runing sen 23e #Sweden
@JohanBernhardsson9 ай бұрын
They went out of stock fast on the release date in Europe but came back just 2 days later.
@UltraviewXLimited9 ай бұрын
It's still not available on the UK store. Says coming soon.
@kimpedersen9 ай бұрын
@@JohanBernhardsson - yes, i guess every USG3 owner are wanting to get one asap
@cmoullasnet9 ай бұрын
Thank you for this review from Montreal! You're the first I've seen that's provided data on routing performance with IDS/IPS and Smart Queues. This is all anybody really needs to know. If it works for your application, great, if not, move on. We have deployed literally hundreds of ER-X because of the high performance in a small package (compared to original USG). This comes in at double the price, but at least stays within the UniFi ecosystem. Decisions decisions!
@JacksonCampbell8 ай бұрын
I just found out the ER-X only does 500mbps because of something with the chip or something on the ER-X and ER-X-SFP. I was disappointed, because I had thought they were gigabit. There's not a different EdgeRouter in that price range or size, otherwise I would be using a different device to ensure gigabit availability.
@cmoullasnet8 ай бұрын
@@JacksonCampbell They can route at gigabit speeds. Google “er-x hardware offload”. You just need to run a couple of commands and it will work at line speed just fine. You can’t do that with software features like smart queues or DPI though.
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
@@JacksonCampbell ER-X can do simultaneous gigabit, and UXG-Light can't. As usual, Ubiquiti will not have regular releases for entry line products as well, which is comparable with edgerouter support. Honestly, both of them is a waste of money in 2023.
@JacksonCampbell8 ай бұрын
@@yuriykorenyak2351 You're wrong about all of that. ER-X is limited to 500mbps because of a limitation of the link to the switch or something. UXG Lite definitely does gigabit. Not sure what you mean about support for them. They are both getting updates. And they are both good deals for what they are.
@mbergtberg8 ай бұрын
@@JacksonCampbell Enable the hardware offload via command line on the ER-X to get gigabit. There are a number of KZbin videos that walks you through the steps.
@kieran.thejasperhouse6 ай бұрын
WOW, perfect video, Im giving my UDM to my friend since I have an AC-AP-PRO which is going to a U7 Pro, plus I have all unifi network switch's but im changing my server area one from a 5 port mini to a 16 Port POE. I am also running Unifi on my PI4 in a docker so im good on that front. So the UXG LIte would be a perfect fit for my setup. The UDM will go to a person who will fully use the power it has. Im also buying the a POE+ splitter to power the Lite on one of the 8 POE+ ports.
@sleepysloth8476 ай бұрын
Would it be wise to move from my Edgerouter 4 to a UXG, I'd rather have a UDM SE, but I am working out of a 10 inch rack intentionally (Kinda like the SFF build of the networking world). I have a couple of VPNS to a couple of cloud providers, 10 VLANS, tons of firewall rules and a concurrent 1gb internet connection. I did see there was anew beta build for the ER-4 with a complete redesign of the UI making me wonder if the project is still alive again or if they are just worried about a reskin instead of potentially adding more features.
@seanwoods15269 ай бұрын
Solid well well-thought-out video Cody.
@itsm0ttzy9 ай бұрын
You should do a weekly network podcast and call it Mactelecast. :)
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
It would be rambling about nothing 😂 but I’ll give it a thought
@lordcarnorjax85999 ай бұрын
Wonder if they'll release a model just called UXG. We've got the rack mount 10Gb multi WAN UXG-Pro & now the 1Gb single UXG Lite so there's a market that likes the size & form factor of the Lite but want mutli WAN & multi Gig support.
@juleswilko2 ай бұрын
Wish mine had been so easy to swap and replace… just bombed the entire network, even after selecting “replace gateway”.
@chaosfenix9 ай бұрын
I really feel they should have had an integrated controller with this thing. It can't have been that much more expensive and could have benefitted a lot of use cases. As is I would honestly recommend the Unifi Dream Router for most configurations even if you don't need the integrated wifi. In addition to the integrated AP it has more ports, integrated storage, and expandable storage meaning you could really start getting into other unifi applications like unifi protect.
@freshmikey828 ай бұрын
Apparently there will be a non-lite version with wifi6 and controller ..
@JacksonCampbell8 ай бұрын
@@freshmikey82 Well, there is the Express, but even that isn't. Maybe the Ultra is what you're referring to. That would be nice.
@mvp_kryptonite9 ай бұрын
Nice review, come on Ubiquiti, I’d like to see some redundancy/ failover of routers
@MichaelAlderete9 ай бұрын
It’s the new entry level gateway. Redundancy isn’t an entry level feature. You can always go for the Dream Machine Pro.
@PCTek-ix7xm9 ай бұрын
@@MichaelAlderete or add the U-LTE @ $199. The Omada ER605 can have up to 3 WAN ports at $60
@mvp_kryptonite9 ай бұрын
@@MichaelAlderete I have the UXG Pro, and I’m referring to the application not the hardware. If Ubiquiti want to limit it to pro versions, maybe understandable but we need more features.
@rrschmid6 ай бұрын
great video! exactly what I wanted to find out thanks!!
@jfkastner9 ай бұрын
Extra Thumbs-up for the Blink182 Shirt. Well done Video!
@gymsaslan66257 ай бұрын
I have been looking forward to a successor for the USG for many years and when it finally arrives it is a disappointment by not having wall mounting holes at the back. Il keep my USG.
@Stev.3n9 ай бұрын
I was going to pick one up to replace my USG 3P but it went OOS. Picked up a UDM Pro with the Black Friday sale instead.
@michapiotrstankiewicz27139 ай бұрын
It would be cool if it had PoE charging
@YoungJosephM9 ай бұрын
Looking to see if this device does multiple VLANs and or Subinterfaces. Based on the multiple networks you configured I'm going to go with yes. Great video thanks for the review.
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Yup it does multiple vlans same as any other Ubiquiti firewall
@dcuza9 ай бұрын
If I adopt this Gateway Lite with an UDM/UDR can I use multi WAN???
@shaunfinegan22279 ай бұрын
This is now available in Australia.
@Mark-ev8qb9 ай бұрын
Thanks! great video. The performance with IPS max is great. I will buy to replace my old USG as soon as mpore become available. Again, Thanks for a great video.
@videocruzer4 ай бұрын
CAN THIS DEVICE/ MODEL QUORANTINE IP ADDRESSES? THANKS
@techfan039 ай бұрын
I think the biggest complaint for me is the gigabit ports. I think the ports should’ve been 2.5, at least. We need to start ditching gigabit because multi-gigabit is the future. No affordable products(under $200?) have 2.5 for WAN and LAN yet. I recently got fiber for the first time and my ISP has a router with a 2.5 WAN port, but the LAN port is 1gb so I think that’s a waste too. The industry is moving so slow for household multi-gigabit.
@Jannickjay9 ай бұрын
That’s why I returned mine. All should be minimum 2.5 gb
@sirlesliechao9 ай бұрын
I'm on the fence. I've had multi gig available where I am for the last year or two. Still haven't upgraded due to the additional monthly cost, as well as the need to upgrade everything else in my house. Having said that, the Brume 2, which has a 30% faster processor, is like $70. It also has a 2.5 gb WAN port. For how cheap RAM is these days, I thank Ubiquiti could have added more ram.
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
What 2.5GBit are you speaking about? UXG-Light even can't do simultaneous gigabit. It is more or less ER-x competitor and not a light version of UXG-pro
@techfan038 ай бұрын
@@yuriykorenyak2351 eero pro 6E has a 2.5 WAN port. I don’t have any Ubiquiti products.
@williamp68008 ай бұрын
@@yuriykorenyak2351 The video showed a test of it doing gigabit. What is that test not showing that you think this should be doing?
@FTLN9 ай бұрын
Lets hope the Cloud Gateway Ultra comes soon......
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
🤞
@szaboclaudiu9 ай бұрын
I also wait for something like that. 1 x 1Gb LAN it's not enough for me.
@HwdevelopmentOmaha7 ай бұрын
Does it allow for "Site Magic" on a self hosted controller? The Website says: License-free SD-WAN* - *When paired with a Cloud Key or Official UniFi Hosting. Thanks for the great video!
@Morbeyn9 ай бұрын
Would be great to see how this stacks up against a Netgate 1100… The USG was no comparison at all
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Is the 1100 not end of life? I could be wrong about that
@---GOD---9 ай бұрын
I'd be extremely surprised if it wasn't way better than the decade old device it replaces 😂 This is a great product for the average consumer who wants to step up from a typical Asus or TP-Link. I couldn't justify recommending the dream machine line to people. This ones more reasonable.
@kensingh95279 ай бұрын
This is more for MSPs and similar use cases, as you would need a console to connect it to. I would only recommend the dream machine line for ordinary folk, as it’s an simpler all in one solution, and can accommodate other household stuffs like doorbells, cameras, locks, home phones, etc.
@---GOD---9 ай бұрын
@@kensingh9527 Yes, for an all-in-one, it's great. By 'step up' I meant away from the all-in-one units, in which case it'd be the UDM Pro which is just unreasonable. I used to recommend the USG but it's just way too old and outdated now so I'm glad they made this new unit. Essentially a direct replacement of the USG.
@RobertHorvat9 ай бұрын
Is it good alternative for EdgeRouter X?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Yup it would be :)
@CyCLoBoT6 ай бұрын
What's the process of adopting UXG Lite if the LAN scope is different from the default settings?
@techbyfinne9 ай бұрын
New Camera / setup? Looks good :)
@mx3387 ай бұрын
My only real complaint is the plastic housing, it's not recyclable and just makes the devices feel disposable.
@anthonypkeane6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video Cody. Do you know if I connect a UCK-G2-PLUS and use Unifi Protect?
@ztech-consulting9 ай бұрын
Great video Cody!
@yornik8 ай бұрын
Thank you fir the review did you test the wireguard speeds too or was the vpn with ipsec or openvpn?
@holgerhaslbeck50109 ай бұрын
Anyone knows if it's possible to disable the NAT between WAN and LAN Port? Since i need to have NAT been done on the device infant of the WAN port and set a fixed route. This is how I do it on my USG. But the USG hat console access, so it was passible to manually change firewall rules. AFAIK you do not have a console access on the UXG...
@EastyUK6 ай бұрын
Seems like a catch22 on installation if you use a lan based unify server. On setup it wants me to switch the wan connection to the uxg-lite (as you showed) then for console it says offline as we obviously unplugged the original dhcp server, and it’s not yet assigning IPs for the lan. Do I need to have it as a different subnet and then somehow allow it to see the original network just to get it adopted? Seems like if they had it default as a dhcp server this wouldn’t be an issue. Any tips?
@RuivoM9 ай бұрын
Do you have a typo in your excel in the end with inter vlan speeds for UXG? It says 836/302 but in the speed test it’s 836/902.
@CKkoen9 ай бұрын
Exactly, I noticed that too when he was showing the Excel table. I was like 'woow, that's low' and went back in the video to see the speed test again 😂 probably a typo, @MactelecomNetworks
@roberts.37129 ай бұрын
I am in the U.S. and just received one today. I have the Cloud Key controller and want to change my present Tplink router to this one. Is it a drop-in replacement by disconnecting the Tplink router and connecting the new UAG-Lite and using the Unifi App Bluetooth discovery to adopt it? I have Unifi switches and about 24 clients right now.
@ryoohk9 ай бұрын
I'm so glad there is a USG replacement, they may be little tanks that keep on going but it's time for them to grow up
@msh10448 ай бұрын
I got one as well. And overall it is really great. However, being based on the new Unifi OS this gateway does not support deploying customer configuration to it using the gateway.json file. This is pretty annoying as i need this to use the USG as an internet modem for my fiber connection. ( which requires settings like having IPv4 over VLAN 6 but IPv6 using VLAN 0. ( And TV also has its own VLAN. But the USG itself has no interface for this. So now with the new UXG Mini it is no longer possible to use all the features of my internet connection at the same time.
@AcuraKidd9 ай бұрын
Any comments on the hardware offloading that was present in the usg that's not available in the uxg-lite? How does this affect the performance?
9 ай бұрын
He literally showed a speed test with IPS/IDS turned on which required hardware offloading.
@danielmalinowski29189 ай бұрын
already on my desk from 23 Nov in #Poland
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Man Canada always gets things last 😂 hope you enjoy it
@skorpion12989 ай бұрын
Is it possible to do a 3+ SIte to Site VPN with this Device to one location? Id like to connect 2 more houses to my home Network where a third UXG would sit. Routing in LAN is a pfSense in my Home and at the remote locations it should be the UXG. And it should be Split-VPN so not all traffic runs through my home.
@ibrahimkesetovic78699 ай бұрын
I'm wondering would this be a mix & match perfect to pair with UDR...overall I know it's All-in-One but...what makes me mad is UDR Display that shows speeds of 0.1 Up & Down Mbps... which, real internet speed is 53/10 Up & Down Mbps... + on top of this...CK Gen 2+ comes later...as a ,,Storage" for Ubiquity Cameras...as temporarly solution for 3x G5 Bullet & 1x G5 Flex... just to cover the Main Entrance & Main Windows on the 1st floor as it's like 2M high & it's low-key easy to break in my home... adding Alarm sensors for Vibrations & Any movement ofbthe windows just to stop burglars to get inside my home. 😅😊 Love the vid' Mate. 😊❤️✌️
@rickwookie7 ай бұрын
Was that VPN test using Wireguard? How does it compare to the VPN throughput you'd get using a UDM-PRO?
@timdaeleman9 ай бұрын
Good to see the claimed performance improvements to be real! I have my UXG Lite lying here ready to be installed. Still waiting for the Home Assistant Unifi addon to be bumped up to 8.0.7. However I see quite some issues with the lite on the Ubiquiti forum. Loopback/hairpin not working, SSH stability issues, adopt loops of all network elements after adopting the UXG lite, etc. So I'll wait a bit till we have more stable firmware & controller software. Additionally I still can't fully figure out how to exactly adopt the new gateway when the controller is on a different than default subnet without loosing all my settings.
@Verminator1510298 ай бұрын
Great video! So my BIGGEST concern about swapping out my aging USG-3P for this UXG-Lite is if I would lose any settings or have to do any configuring. After all it's been about 7 years since I put the USG-3P into service and I can't remember what I did. So from your video, it appears that the only thing you need to do is unplug the USG-3P and power up the UXG-Lite and swap the LAN and WAN cables, and make sure you remove the USG-3P from your network before you adopt the UXG-Lite, and that's it???????? You sure there isn't anything else that needs to be done to ensure everything stays the was it was with the USG-3P???? If not, that's relieved a lot a concern I've been having about getting one.
@sholnay8 ай бұрын
I'm in the same boat, wondering the same thing. I remember having to jump through hoops to get the USG connected to my ISP and ever since I got it working, I haven't touched it, but it's also been 7 years and I have no idea what I really did. I think I have all the settings and options correctly documented but, if it doesn't work, then I'm SOL and kind of on my own!
@SithTracy9 ай бұрын
Mine arrived today to replace my USG. Migration went well.
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
That’s great to hear, it’s an awesome unit
@tommyrox9 ай бұрын
Great news! What steps did you take to do the migration?@@MactelecomNetworks
@Excited-IT-Architect9 ай бұрын
Did you have to change anything still on the UXG side after the migration process , e.g. WAN-IP (for a transfer network) or adding any Fiewall Rules etc.? Was it really just removing USG and adapting the new device (UXG Lite) to run exactly same configuration?
@SithTracy9 ай бұрын
@@Excited-IT-Architect I do not run a default 192.168.1.0/24 so I had to run an ethernet cable from my computer to the LAN port on the router and go in via http to the default address and make some changes to the LAN side... then removed the cables from the USG and put them in the UXG-Lite, removed the USG from the network and adopted the new device. Everything rolled in nicely. I do suggest you make config backups beforehand just in case.
@SithTracy8 ай бұрын
@@Excited-IT-Architect Not a thing... CloudKey had all the network settings. Piece of cake.
@j.j.64618 ай бұрын
Will a UXG-Lite and Cloud Key+ combo work with Site Magic?
@oudomsambatchorn8519 ай бұрын
I can get either er-x or usg for 25-35$ here used should I get it instead?
@RaduPirscoveanu9 ай бұрын
What about ipsec sts? I am not able to get more than 13mbps.
@OfficialCHRFilms7 ай бұрын
gateway lite uxg-lite worth getting if you have the dream router?
@ny9alc7054 ай бұрын
Can I create openvpn server on uxg-lite?
@gjheydon9 ай бұрын
This looks about the same size as the Apple TV. So I wonder if the Apple TV mount from total mount would allow you to put this on a wall.
@PCTek-ix7xm9 ай бұрын
or a 3m vhb velcro
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
Yes, you can and should put it on the wall, with help of 5" nail and a hammer.
@pju289 ай бұрын
Does it use / offer wireguard? Thanks for your effort!
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Yup it does
@djspecialpaul4 ай бұрын
Nice - a bit "sad" that no "small" router has PoE -- this would be nice.
@QuikTechSolutions9 ай бұрын
Good review!
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Thanks Tony 🙏
@DeNNiiiable9 ай бұрын
Does it have the new VPN wireguard OpenVPN?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
It does
@DeNNiiiable9 ай бұрын
Not sure why everyone mentions it's the same and not mention this change? The usg and usg4pro don't have those options
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
@@DeNNiiiable 🤷♂️ I never use the USG or USG pro anymore for the last few years so didn’t know it wasn’t capable of that
@darellderosia61409 ай бұрын
Any suggestion as to why wifi speed drops dramatically compared to wired? Using UAP AC PRO.
@ananamusly9 ай бұрын
Better off asking reddit KZbin isn't great for tech support
@kanyon_ni_mang_simeon9 ай бұрын
That usb-c power source will be the achilles heel you cannot easily replace it with aftermarket when it fails!
@unicodefox8 ай бұрын
What? You can use the UXG-L with any USB-C power supply you want
@christophermueller33709 ай бұрын
3d print a wall mount or holder for it if need be
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
I really need to get my printer setup
@MisterFastbucks9 ай бұрын
Ubiquiti bought out Apple's stock of old Airport Express'
@GNRTV8 ай бұрын
Will the UXG Lite speed up the VPN connections too?
Can it do 1 gig symmetrical? Or is it only 1 gig one way?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
It can
@user-kw3hm1qi7q9 ай бұрын
Great video. Appreciate all the speed testing.
@trick05029 ай бұрын
Better for routing, this or the udr?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
This 100% you can only get max 700mbps with the UDR
@trick05029 ай бұрын
@@MactelecomNetworks so what if you already have a udr (like me)? You think you could set this up as your router and just use the udr as an ap/controller? I already have a uxg pro and ap throughout the house. 1/1 internet connection.
@arigornstrider9 ай бұрын
The model name is frustrating. I thought the x was supposed to denote 10g support; guess I was wrong.
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
The naming convention is odd. For 10Gb you would use the uxg pro
@arigornstrider9 ай бұрын
@@MactelecomNetworks yeah, that's what I'm running now. Just trying to understand what the model numbers are supposed to mean.
@Nobodyjbh149 ай бұрын
X in this context means Next-gen. Normally when UI uses XG to indicate 10G support it's after the Product family e.g US-XG-6POE, USW-Flex-XG.
@kireruskywalker9 ай бұрын
Can I buy the UniFi express and add onto that regular WiFi 6 lite access points ?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Yup you could do that
@williamp68008 ай бұрын
You can, but the biggest limitation with the Express is that it can only manage itself and four other Unifi devices. So for example, you could add a Flex Mini Switch and three access points, and you've hit the limit. It also can only run Unifi Network, so you can't use it to manage Unifi cameras or anything else.
@mangoleon009 ай бұрын
Hello do you recommend qos?, I have multiple UniFi cameras, 2 girls watching Disney. I would like to improve my latency on Xbox. 750mb symmetric internet
@marcoschirrmeister8 ай бұрын
With 750MBit/s I don't think you need qos, if all users do a normal usage. If you have a client that does downloads and saturates the uplink, then you might want to look into QoS.
@SuperKiroChan8 ай бұрын
How does the performance of the UXG-Lite compare to the ER-4?
@MactelecomNetworks8 ай бұрын
Not sure I do not have a ER-4 to test with
@NixTeam19 ай бұрын
What about WireGuard client and all vpn options?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
They are all there
@Mr_nah9 ай бұрын
Is there any reason to pick UXG Lite instead of UDM Pro? I’ve had some bad experiences with Ubiquiti devices overheating.
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
Yes, there is a reason, if you have 500 or less gbit inet without Protect and you don't know much about networking, UXG-Light is for you. Otherwise get ER-x for a half of the price and it will do the same due to similar hardware.
@Mr_nah8 ай бұрын
@@yuriykorenyak2351 lol the only reason I’m thinking of ubiq is because I’m tired of pfsense bs, and I definitely need the Protect. I just don’t see any value in the uxg lite compared to the udm pro
@tommyrox9 ай бұрын
What's the best way to replace my USG with my new UXG Lite to save port forwarding?
@Stev.3n9 ай бұрын
If you keep the same controller instance and adopt it should keep the port forwarding settings if I recall.
@tommyrox9 ай бұрын
Yes Clous Key Gen 2@@Stev.3n
@tommyrox9 ай бұрын
Thx!@@Stev.3n
@chrisparsons31419 ай бұрын
The self hosted controller statement baffles a lot of noobs I think, myself included. Does the controller need to be running 24/7 for the equipment to work? Or can I just run the controller on my laptop to get the equipment up and running and for when I need to make modifications and then shut it down? And all my equipment will still work? What is the point or need of running the controller 24/7?
@ananamusly9 ай бұрын
No it doesn't need to run 24/7. It's just for monitoring, really. I've had one setup on my laptop. Worked fine. Nowadays I bought a mini pc from Amazon and put the controller on that and let it run 24/7. It's just good to have something you can remotely access if you are away and check on things.
@chrisparsons31419 ай бұрын
@@ananamusly thank you.
@williamp68008 ай бұрын
The controller only needs to be running when you want to adjust settings, use the wifi captive portal, or if you want to gather traffic statistics. Ran it for four years on my laptop before finally moving it to a Raspberry Pi 3 a year ago.
@angeschossen90757 ай бұрын
You'll need it if you want your access points to update automatically.
@BDBD169 ай бұрын
Whats the KZbin VLan for?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
They aren’t for anything I just named it that for this video
@webluke9 ай бұрын
The value of this new router isn't as good as a Dream Router with its built-in controller, AP, and switch. If you are running your own Unifi server in the cloud for a lot of devices, it could be useful, but it seems like they could cut $30 off, and it makes more sense.
@jagoedhart9 ай бұрын
Now bring out UXG Lite+ with 2.5Gb LAN and WAN ports.
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
We asked Ubiquiti for such a product: 2.5Gb port, sfp, desktop compact version and it is what we got for a price what we asked.
@RodrigoLozada819 ай бұрын
Can it be used as a 3rd WAN with a UDM Pro?
@Pabula9 ай бұрын
We used to see QoS capablities on Ubiquti routers like EdgeRouterX around 100mbps, EdgerRouter4 around 200mpbps, What can we expect on pure QoS on the UXG Lite? more than 200mpbs?
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Well there really isn’t QoS on these devices it’s more of wifi limiting . Hope to see traditional QOS implement in an update
@Pabula9 ай бұрын
@@MactelecomNetworks Thanks for the reply Cody. The wifi limiting... not sure it would work out for me, hope they expand it as to limit on wired aswell.
@ponchosalazar9 ай бұрын
Seemed a very compeling device until I realized that it does not host unifi software…
@lordcarnorjax85999 ай бұрын
The coming UniFi Express is the same size but also runs a controller on it, has a built-in WAP & screen.
@williamp68008 ай бұрын
Running the controller is only slightly more difficult than sleeping. I don't see the problem.
@Polkster139 ай бұрын
Looks like a White AppleTV.
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
It does
@JasonsLabVideos9 ай бұрын
ME FIRST !
@omni43768 ай бұрын
No PoE, only 1 Gbps. In addition the current software is broken beyond believe. Create a VLAN, create a SSID. It should be a guest / isolated network. But turning this option on, that worked in the old USG well, will make your clients on that SSID not get any DHCP addresses and not get internet. Only workaround currently is to make the network not a 'guest' network. Which means it will be able to talk to all other devices. The hole guest / corporate network shizzle makes the actual configuration of that brick even hard for network experts because ubnt tries to hide complexity behind proprietary gimmicks that make the actual effective configuration as un-transparent as it gets. And then they don't even work the way they should on release day because the customer is their alpha tester... Ubnt is only successful because the other network vendors for their customer scope are even worse (hard to believe...)
@roberts.3712Ай бұрын
My USG-Lite sucked.
@norseironworks9 ай бұрын
gigabit? I thought they went away from that to 10 mbit
@nate80889 ай бұрын
Very few places outside of major cities have even 1 gigabit ISP rates. It's pretty sad in north america.
@videocruzer4 ай бұрын
a
@robpruey9 ай бұрын
Should have been 2.5 gig ports. Waste of a product in my opinion. Even at $129.00
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
Especially when you can buy a way more capable hardware for a price, even from Ubiquiti by itself.
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
I now have Ubiquiti affiliate links. If you're purchasing anything from the store and want to support me use the links below :) ▶Ubiquiti affiliate link: store.ui.com/us/en?a_aid=MacTelecom
@s.i.m.c.a9 ай бұрын
way worse......so support for several wans what auto marks it as a garbage
@koholdgaard9 ай бұрын
Looks like a Apple TV 😂
@lordcarnorjax85999 ай бұрын
More like a Apple Airport Express 2nd Gen.
@yuriykorenyak23518 ай бұрын
No sfp port in 2023 - such a shame. No bidirectional gigabit - not possible simultaneous upload/download gigabit throughput. Virtually any consumer router with ddwrt will do a better job than this small piece of obsolete (and overpriced at the same time) hardware. My statement is valid if you have a home lab. For corporate environment, you need to really save on your IT if you decide to buy this small piece of junk. We voted for modern router in compact form factor and got as a result 10 years old piece of hardware even not capable of a full gigabit. On my side, I want to get rid of my old ER-4 which becomes a bottleneck and trouble issuer in my home lab (no updates, no fixes for issues). But, as I found, UXG-Light is actually a competition for ER-x - and it is not really an improvement for me. And here I am speaking about home lab. Corporate - big NO! You can get a way better piece of hardware with more capable software for 129$ USD.
@greglopez82069 ай бұрын
Embrace the baldness brother. Give up the cap and shave your head 👌🏻
@MactelecomNetworks9 ай бұрын
Fun fact I’m not bald. However I do have alopecia which sometimes causes bald spots. I like the hat but appreciate the concern
@WeThrowPie9 ай бұрын
all this configuration and bs, and gets the same speeds I do with an eero.