V2 test | titanic sos | roblox |

welcome to another titanic sos video this is a video of the titanic sos version 2 update which will be coming soon there will be more titanic sos version 2 tests in the future of which i will make videos on. Enjoy
discord server
/ discord

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Guys join my discord server discord.gg/nfzs7eVk

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

The reason the fourth funnel does not fall is that no reliable witnesses said it fell and many said it was still standing post break. It’s structure was also more heavily reinforced than the other 3. It more likely broke off in the descent.

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 sorry boi but until I get more evidence I still believe that the 4th funnel fell when the ship broke in two

[@omerolopez9741]

Fun fact: Titanic has a fictious war scheme in the game (its my favorite one)

[@danieldoesstuff18]

I know

[@uhh-1e]

39:29 moth sos

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Yes moth sos

[@Rickyminesdiamonds]

playing this since 2021 old titanic sos

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Noice also my first 1k view video thanks guys

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

Hi Danieldoesstuff, I was wondering if I could ask please, what makes you think fourth funnel fell in break? I will admit, it doesn’t make sense for it to fall in break in my opinion as many accounts say it was still standing post break but I would like to hear thoughts and offer my thoughts and critique. Thanks :)

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 because I just haven’t seen evidence also my theory is based on what I have read in on a sea of glass and the fourth funnel not falling during the breakup isn’t even suggested

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 Several survivors said it was still standing post break. What is causing it to fall? The stern settling isn’t enough to topple it as it was built stronger than the other 3 funnels OASAG was written in 2012. It is a good book in my opinion but does have some outdated info. They also misinterpreted Frank Osmans account. Quite abit of the info in the breakup section appears to be cherrypicked in my opinion. They went with fourth funnel collapse as Dillon said it did but ignoring that Dillon said it was after break and also, ignoring that many others survivors said the funnel didn’t at all fall. I still think OASAG is a good source of the Titanic but not fully reliable as I explained above. In my opinion, it is best to use several different sources and not just base a theory on one source. THG also doesn’t believe the funnel fell in break. Historic travels doesn’t either. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant.

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 For example, Jack Thayer - The last funnel was touching the surface of the water. (…) I do not believe it fell. George Crowe - One third of the aft funnel sticking up. Ida Hippach - The last I saw was a single funnel which remained above water for several minutes. Plus, other survivors were able to see what the stern was doing post break. All the lights were out before it began to rise one miNUte after settling and if the funnel, they wouldn’t be able to see the stern.

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 One other question btw: Did you see the accounts about lights going out in sections I sent you in a reply in a comment sector to one of my outdated theory videos out of interest?

[@AndyJakeGaming]

The funnel is not falling because it was discovered that it didn't. You can see it not falling in the 2023 Honor and Glory animation.

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Yes I know I have seen the animation more than once now

[@MatteoRamaccioni84]

Hail Athos!

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Yea glad to see the og athos again

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

The 4th funnel was built very differently from the 3rd funnel. It was built much stronger and the guy wires were only their to help with Stability. None of the Titanic's funnels fell because of the guy wires snapping. The wires snapped because the funnels were falling. Even if the deckhouse formed, which I think it did, it would snap nearly all guy wires but based on my research, due to its design and how well built it was (that the funnels probably fell partially submerged but based on my research, only 40%) it wouldn't fall. Their is also evidence of this on the wreck, if it fell, the deckhouse would have been crushed and mangled. However, it isn't, so that would help suggest that it fell late. The damage to the first class smoking room was probably caused by the descent to the sea floor. Unless the stern crashed back into the water, then the 4th funnel falling would be quite unrealistic. I doubt it even fell at the surface. If it fell at the surface, it would end up further from the stern but it is quite near to the stern so it probably would have disintegrated during the descent. It was built quite strongly so it couldn't have fallen unless the stern crashed back. It would require less force than the mast so if it fell, the mast would have fallen. While the 4th funnel was fake, it was quite structurally stable. Thier are only 2 testimonies of the fourth funnel falling. First is from Percy Keen who said the second funnel broke off after break. (Would have been 4th funnel as that was the second one standing in break.) However, in another interview, he said the first funnel (Would have been 3rd funnel) fell in break so he most likely confused and thought 4th funnel fell. The only testimony of the fourth funnel falling is from Thomas Dillon and he testifyed he say it being pushed towards him while the stern was rising. However, he was drunk so it likely went under standing. Plenty of survivors said it stood long after break. These include Jack Thayer, Ida Hippach, Edward Buley, George Crowe, Samuel Rule, George Symons, Frank Evans, Fredrick Hoyt, Thomas Dillon, Ruth Becker, Patrick Dillon, Thomas Ranger, and John Collins. If it falls during or after break, it dismisses countless survivors. For example, Jack Thayer literally said that he saw the fourth funnel in the water still standing as the stern rose up. Ida Hippach and Edward Buley said that they watched the remaining funnel for several minutes. Thomas Dillon said that the funnel didn't fall until the ship actually went down. George Crowe, when asked, said that it remained standing after the stern floated back. John Collins said it was still visible when the ship turned over and went down. The reason everyone says it did was because it was shown in several popular theories. While scources like OASAG are great scources in my opninion, they went with the funnel collapse in break as it is the general consensus of what happened. Here are some of the testimonies that say it stood long after break - Jack Thayer - Her stern was gradually rising into the air... the last funnel was about on the surface on the water... I do not believe it fell. Her deck was turned slightly towards us... the great after part of the ship, two hundred and fifty feet of it, rose into the sky, till it reached a sixty-five- or seventy-degree angle. Ida Hippach - The Titanic had keeled to one side and was slowly sinking. Less than twenty minutes after we touched the water, we heard two loud explosions. The explosions occurred almost simultaneously. The giant ship quivered from stem to stern. It parted almost in the centre and slowly sank. The last I saw of it was a single smokestack, which remained above water for several minutes Edward Buley - Q. Notwithstanding the darkness you could see the outline of the ship? A. Yes, sir; we could see the outline of the ship. Q. You could see the funnel? A. Quite plainly. George Crowe - After getting clear of the ship the lights were still burning very bright, but as we got away she seemed to go lower and lower, and she almost stood up perpendicular, and her lights went dim, and presently she broke clean in two, probably two-thirds of the length of the ship...one-third of the aft funnel sticking up. The after part floated back, ... then there was an explosion, and the aft part turned on end and sank John Collins - Q. When you were in the water, after you came up above the surface of the water, you saw the lights on the Titanic? A. Just as I came up to the surface, sir. Her bow was in the water. She had not exploded then. Her bow was in the water, and I just looked around and saw the lights. Q. Had she broken in two? A. Her bow was in the water and her stern was up. Q. But you did not see any break? You did not think she had parted, and broken in two? A. Her bow was in the water. She exploded in the water. She exploded once in the water, and her stern end was up out of the water; and with the explosion out of the water it blew her stern up. Q. You saw it while it was up? A. Yes, sir; saw her stern up. Q. How long? A. I am sure it floated for at least a minute. Q. The lights were still burning? A. No, sir; the lights was out. Q. If it was dark, how could you see? A. We were not too far off. I saw the white of the funnel. Then she turned over again, and down she went. Patrick Dillon - Q. Before the ship actually went down did you see her make any movements? A. Yes, she took one final plunge and righted herself again. Q. She gave a plunge and righted herself again? A Yes. Q. Did you notice anything about the funnel? A. Not then. Q. Did you afterwards notice something about the funnel? A Yes. Q. What? A. When she went down. Q. Was that after you had left the ship? A Before I left the ship. Q. What did you notice? A. Well, the [aftermost] funnel seemed to cant up towards me. Q. Did you get the idea that the ship was breaking in two? A. No. Q. When you came up again, after you were sucked down - you told us you were sucked down and came up again was the ship still floating then? A. No. Q. She had sunk when you came up again? A. Well, I saw what I thought would be the afterpart of her coming up and going down again, final. Q. Then she had not sunk? A. She came up and went down again. Q. You saw what you thought was the afterpart coming up again? A. I thought it was the ship coming up again. She came up and went down again - finish. The reason nearly everyone says it fell is because of the general consensus. However, the general consensus is a very unreliable tool as things survivors said get ignored. For example, several survivors said Titanic broke but we believed it sank intact for 73 years due to the general consensus and relying on only Lightoller and Gracie's testimony. Researching survivor accounts has taught the Titanic community alot about how Titanic sank as we have realised that the list likely eased at start of plunge, fourth funnel remained standing post break, later launch time for Boat 10, forward funnels fell to starboard, that the port list was heavier than prevoiusly thought and that the lights likely went out in sections which in the past wasnt believed. Using testimonies can be important though you have to use them with a grain of salt. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant.

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 I can give an explanation to why the deck house didn’t get crushed the fourth funnel did fall aft and to the port side and I recently found out that is is unlikely the stern actually imploded also no offence taken

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18Thanks for reply. 2 questions: 1. What is you explanation for the deckhouse not getting crushed by the falling funnel? I would be interested to hear it. 2. What makes you think it fell? No accounts apart from the 2 above say it fell and it falling dismisses plenty of survivor accounts listed above that say it didn't fall. (Simillar to what the inquires used to decide the ship didn't break. Only going with a few accounts and not the majority.) I also dont agree with implosion anymore. I used to but not anymore as I have an alternative explanation as to those that said there was an 'explosion' after the ship went under. Plus, others also said it was calm after the stern went under. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant.

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 I also have my own theory. I released a video of my V27 theory today aswell.

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 as I said the fourth fell aft and to the port side the deckhouse was in the middle of the ship

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 and plus survivors don’t say everything either plus not all the survivors were ship experts either

[@Star_SillyRollercoaster]

WAIT A NEW UPDATE. WHAT HAVE I MISSED 😭 (regret having to get discord deleted fr)

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Yea v1.5 is closed until the V2 update releases also Athos was Cerberus the entire time

[@Star_SillyRollercoaster]

@@danieldoesstuff18 DAMM WHAT

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Don’t worry V2 will be out on Friday March 8th 5:30pm GMT

[@Star_SillyRollercoaster]

@@danieldoesstuff18 yipee

[@what_is_that1922]

Im famous😃

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Yes you are

[@heypoodle9963]

THIS IS AMAZING

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Thank you

[@xkaiakox5883]

PLEASE ADD A MOBILE OPTION FOR LESS LAG

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Who are ya asking

[@danieldoesstuff18]

Also this update will reduce lag

[@xkaiakox5883]

@@danieldoesstuff18 do you know when it come out??

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

I have one other question out of interest: Did you see the accounts I sent to you in a reply about a later departure time for Boat 10 and the accounts about the lights going in sections on my V19 theory video comments out of interest?

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 yea but I still believe that boat 10 left at 1:50am along with boat 4 also I don’t see why the lights go out in sections because the room that was used for the lights were near the engine room

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 Here is a video explaining why the lights went out in sections - kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaq0gZqpf85sbLs The3 research for Boat 10's lowering time isn't complete yet and we did add it before we had a concrete conclusion though I lean more towards a later launch time for Boat 10 for certain reasons.

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff182 questions - please may I ask what Makes you think Boat 10 left at that time? I would be interested to hear and offer my critique on it. Research about Boat 10 isn’t complete yet but I personally lean more towards a later departure time as it accounts for survivors. Did you see Oceanliner designs video posted below explaining about the lighting system and how they likely failed in sections during the final 20 minutes aswell out of interest? Sorry for any offence, no offence meant.

[@danieldoesstuff18]

@@IloveCruiseShips1912 I have seen that video

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@danieldoesstuff18 What were your thoughts on that video out of interest?