Supreme Court Upholds 'Socialist & Secular' in Preamble | Detailed Analysis | Perspective

[@hafizjabirsaquafiuduma3057]

Sir..... The word "integrity" was also added to the Constitution by 42nd CAA.

[@AmanRaj-kd1if]

Thanks sir for elaborating this issue

[@Angeltobewin]

definitely has to be added in our preamble bcoz. It gives the strength to the unity of citizens of India and its emphasis on democracy as secular and socialist ,it doesn't harm any one to add on preamble actually it gives clarity to the PPL of India.

[@Winnie_the_Flu]

india is not socialist anymore. Dr ambedkar oppose that

[@thetruth715]

Then why Waqf board?

[@iwinjosephkj1870]

Waqf board function as like various hindu boards in different parts of india .and Christian organisation in countries are registered under companies act of india​@@thetruth715

[@vedprakashkumarupadhyay9523]

Democracy vs socialism

[@uditraj8290]

Are you sure about "Socialist" ?

[@gopiponnaluri2633]

- There shouldn't be any state sponsored pilgrimage. The govt should be neutral. Religion is one's faith. Tax payers money cannot be used for pilgrimage. We should utilize the money in development of good educational institutions, medical, roads, drinking water and food production infrastructure among other key areas. - The meaning of "discrimination" is very unclear. It can mean a lot of things based on each ones perception. For some this might mean abusing a person due to their caste/community, for some it means biased opportunity/jobs system, for some it might mean color - black, white, fair etc.., - When discriminating a person based on their caste / religion is not acceptable, it applies to every caste and/or religion. Past few decades after independence, we have observed that people belonging to open category (OC) have been targeted by some castes/communities taking advantage of the atrocity acts. When an act is made in the parliament, how didn't the so called intellectual think that it can be abused and why did they not included conditions in the act ? It is so foolish to frame charges (non-bailable) cases just by a meagre complaint by the fake victim. Some have taken advantage of the atrocity act and black mailed the OC communities for money and power. This system should undergo through a huge change. The definition of atrocity should do justice to everyone in this country and cannot become a key in the abusers hands. The atrocity act should include every caste, religion, community and sect, fundamentally every citizen in this country and cannot be a relative to only few in the society. - Eliminate the words - minority and majority from all corners of the constitution and the country. If everyone is being given equal rights, we shouldn't divide people again based on their caste/religion/sect. Provide equals opportunities, serve everyone equally. No reservations, no financial assistance, no subsidies, no partiality whatsoever based on the community. - Hindus are minority in many countries. Are those countries sponsoring Hindus to travel to India and visit holy places in India. Then what is the rationale in giving Haz subsidies other than vote bank politics.

[@luffy-itachi2346]

@@gopiponnaluri2633 when u have the unclear opinion on discrimination then how did u do confident that considering equal rights for all citizens with no minority and majority basis or backward or high class basis , do people really follow that with ur same positive intent , I hope so no . Still we encountering much racisim, discrimination, inequality and untouchability even today after all this well developing society only those kind of laws that we follow according to constitution somewhat save majority of this kind of atrocities against inequalities. See i acknowledge ur concern, but I'm confident that ur solution made the society chaos , i mean it makes inappropriate situations

[@gopiponnaluri2633]

@@luffy-itachi2346 All that you have mentioned - "racisim, inequality and untouchability" is related to psychology of the people in our society. Even after 77 years of independence, if we are in this situation, then even after 100 more years also, we shall be in the same situation unless people adopt proper overall living culture. Right to education, discipline, opportunities, food and housing for everyone equally will put this society in a better shape. Abusing the power of all sorts is a mind game that anyone can play if a person is a bit smart irrespective of cast/religion/sect/educated/uneducated. These days I presume everyone is smart enough no less or more. On the similar lines, minority and majority is just a way to derail the development. When we are living in the same country, with the same constitution, why does someone need to be called minority or majority. Treat everyone equally, apply same thing for everyone. My opinion for this country is to have same thumb rule for everyone in all aspects.

[@supriyadusky5902]

It is unnecessary attempt to eliminate the term secular and socialist from preamble because as before 42nd amendment act 1976 ,does our country is not secular or sociolist.our country is impliedly following the path of secular and socialist due to amendment it becomes explicit..it is baseless to debate or attempt to remove this words

[@kv4720]

Oh,"it does not prevent elimination of religious attitudes and practices". What about the abolitions and amendments to one particular religion while favouring the other? Though I don't support Child Marriages but did they abolish Child Marriages of the only so-called minority just like in Hindu Marriage Act? And this heinous and evil acts are being done on a rampant scale in the states of Assam,Tripura,West Bengal,Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhatisgarh,Telangana,Delhi, Bangalore,Tamil Nadu,Kerala.

[@veerabhadraiahc9422]

It is unnecessary to include secular and social words. It should be as in original constitution before 42nd amendment. It is unfortunate. 😩

[@rockybhai3934]

Best video on this topic

[@AnonymousBrahman]

integrity also add in 42nd caa

[@HANSAYADAVjaipur]

@AnonymousBrahman petition talking about only 2 not about integrity

[@mirrorflame1988]

We should make it just Republic not Socialist or pseudo-secular. Equality in the eyes of the law for all.

[@ritikdubey6089]

Great job

[@nightcoreeeeeeee]

Any amendment to the preamble is only symbolic. Removing secular from the preamble won't change anything in the basic structure of the constitution as Secularism has been stated to be a part of basic structure of the constitution by Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai case, 1994.

[@shamakrai3310]

But you said yourself. It would be symbolic. That means removing Secular word from the Preamble gives the message of rejecting Secularism. That would be counted as a green signal to push religious bias in the administration and governance.

[@nightcoreeeeeeee]

@@shamakrai3310 Any changes in administration is subject to judicial review. If it happens to be against secularism it's most likely to be declared null and void later on. The court judgements are based on basic structure of the constitution, not its preamble. I agree that the message won't be in favour of secularism and it may affect party politics in India. However, party politics in India already appears to be against secularism.

[@shamakrai3310]

@@nightcoreeeeeeee and that would be disastrous for our nation's spirit. Without secularism, Hindus(radical) would demand for Hindu Rashtra and similarly radical elements of other religions would put similar demands. Instead of religion-free society, we are moving towards more religion-filled society.

[@veluritharun4192]

There shouldn't be two meaning for the same word secular if there is two meanings then it shouldn't be added to the constitution. Hindu religious institutions and temples are in the hands of government but not even a single church or mosque is under the government hands. So india is neither secular nor democratic. Think about it and know about it.

[@BABBAR4U]

Top Notch Presentation!!! Impeccable Delivery and The Best Analysis on this topic.. handsdown its far far better than Dhruv Rathee!! ❤️❤️❤️

[@sneakpeek6031]

then what govt is doing with hindu temples....

[@shamakrai3310]

Climate change is happening, Global Warming is happening, Joshimath is sinking (some other cities are next), Deforestation is not stopping, Population is not under control, Pollution is increasing, drinking water or breathing air is becoming difficult in many cities, microplastics are entering our food. But some People are concerned over why "Socialist", "Secular", "and Integrity" words added in 42nd amendment. That's why our nation is not progressing. When the People are wasting their time on secularising-desecularising the country, how can they concentrate on the most important matters.

[@AdventurewithD2HN]

Time to leave India as it is not safe anymore even judiciary is only in favor of rich...

[@uditraj8290]

It's not new bro phenomenon bro

[@Just_randomhuman]

Ok... If democracy says for,of, by people then was it asked to the people back then??? Were the consideration of Elected representatives asked??? Answer it

[@tango3851]

@@Just_randomhuman amendments can be passed by the votes of elected representatives (MPs) in the parliament... there is no other way! Also noone asks people directly, as India is an indirect democracy...not a direct democracy!

[@Just_randomhuman]

@tango3851 that I know.... I asked something else, you're answering basics

[@Anonymousaspirant_18]

@Just_randomhuman According to SC this statement is a legal fiction with a conclusive assumption which cannot be tested in any court of law and thus should not be challenged also

[@Anonymousaspirant_18]

@Just_randomhuman According to SC this statement is a legal fiction with a conclusive assumption which cannot be tested in any court of law and thus should not be challenged also

[@lazy_wolf_unofficial]

@@tango3851 Amendment during emergency should be made invalid. The whole country back then was in a frenzy situation including the judiciary and the opposition in the Parliament.

[@Kaptaan_96]

Afcourse should be the part of preamble..... Also modi ji gives the statement of Sabka sath sabka vikas .

[@uditraj8290]

Please don't bring politicians personal agenda here....

[@ABCDEFGHFJNBVSUI]

😢😢😢😢

[@nareshshingote8081]

Secularism is bullshit , in muslim majority area😂

[@sachindragouda1489]

Sir if secular then how can we ignore noakhali incident and recent times the nooh or waqf board or recent sambhal case. Secular can be seen in england we can see no secularism. Theya are demanding sharia law. Why only hindu temple will remit all its collection to govt and why not masjid .does not ot violate arr 14 15 29 44 . Pakistan and Bangladesh is creation of this attitude. Why to allow for creation of another pakistan. If you allow secular then why minority?

[@Shis169]

@@sachindragouda1489 government not run by your emotions

[@arun-jn8qr]

@@Shis169 kya government muslim ke emotion ke saath chalega kya

[@abdulrazak6634]

@@arun-jn8qr read constitutional debates to know them,first learn something for the sake of raising arguments, don't just start talking because you can. Yes Emotions,but not just of muslims , but Dalits , women and other historically marginalized sections of India were taken into account , that resulted in our constitution. Without emotions and lack of understanding other's emotions ,will lead to apathy and antipathy that are reflected in people just like you who are taking the country to intellectual stagnation backwardness. Educate yourself first.

[@Right-wing.1333]

@@Shis169 Islamic republic of india . Example: waqft board, places of workship act, hindu mandir is under control of government 🙄not any other masjid church, sariya law ???? What is this

[@golamazam1766]

@@sachindragouda1489 If we are secular then how we ignore Gujarat riots & recently Ganvapi, sambhal, delhi roits. Where this government killed muslims intentionally.. If this country is secular they why hundreds of Mosque & Houses have been demolished? Is this country is secular then why beef is banned in BJP ruling states? Doesn't it violate article 14,15 & 19 .. We have personal law according to Constitution. Why do have hindu laws such as Hindu marriage Act, HAMA?