Bold of you to assume I know the name of any statistician.
@zyansheep3 ай бұрын
Bernoulli has a distribution if i remember correctly 🤔
@stanislavkozak28063 ай бұрын
I would be cauchyous with that one, too.
@pfizerpflanze3 ай бұрын
Well, I'm pretty sure you heard some of them before... But the question is: "are the statisticians I know still alive or they passed away?" 😂😂 I knew Cox from Box-Cox transformations and Rao from Rao-Blackwell and Cramer-Rao, but didn't have a clue about when they lived, so such a surprise they lived till a couple years ago
@vingoc31323 ай бұрын
Sealy of you to think I'm only a disinterested Student
@wiwiwi442 ай бұрын
Pearlson ? Bermoulli ? That old guy called binomial ?
@XanderGouws3 ай бұрын
To paraphrase Chappelle Roan, C. R. Rao is your favorite statistician's favorite statistician
@Antowan3 ай бұрын
The Economics prize was added later. It is not an official one, which is why it says in honor of Alfred Noble. Which is why Math maybe added.
@TheThreatenedSwan3 ай бұрын
It's funny how people mention it's not official to deride the winners having beliefs they dislike when the peace and literature prizes exist
@grapefruitsyrup81852 ай бұрын
@@TheThreatenedSwan true
@bcs17933 ай бұрын
Well, Nobel died in 1896 and the prize started in 1901, before Von Neumann and Turing were even born, so I'm pretty confident nobody told Nobel that Computer Science existed lol
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
lol that’s fair I’ll give him a pass for that
@kodiererg3 ай бұрын
I heard his wife cheated on him with a mathematician, but google quickly told me that it wasn't true.
@ThePiotrekpecet3 ай бұрын
@@kodierergHe was never married so that probably didn't happen 😅
@ThePiotrekpecet3 ай бұрын
Well Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace already did some amazing work by that time so he could've heard about it
@TheThreatenedSwan3 ай бұрын
The Zuse prize
@dr0243 ай бұрын
i think Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman, the designers of R, deserve this prize as well as many students and statisticians use R.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
That’s a good one, I didn’t even think about the programming route when I was coming up with my own prediction
@dr0243 ай бұрын
@@very-normal i just thought that these people deserve recognition. thats the least we can do using the free software we've been using. 🙂 nice videos by the way. i love ur content. always looking forward to your uploads.
@julien63313 ай бұрын
0:53 Yup, that’s me. You may wonder how I ended up in this situation…
@mnoble54063 ай бұрын
International Prize in Statistics? IPISS sounds like a proper nickname
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
starting a petition to make that the official name
@anibalismaelfermandois69433 ай бұрын
Exponential distribution entered the room
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
poor guy won’t remember he did
@berjonah1103 ай бұрын
I'll definitely be interested to see who this year's prize goes to. In my opinion Andrew Gelman is definitely in the running. But given how new this prize is, there are others who ought to be considered first.
@musaurelius71442 ай бұрын
You can make a video about the biggest unsolved questions in statisticslike the millenium prizes. Determined on the importance of the questions, the difficulty of the question and how statistical they are in their essence. :) My guess would be Andrew Gelman for the 2025 medal since Social Science are among the big 3 of statistics: Physic statistics, Bio-statistics and Social Statistics.He already have a lot of medals from his contributions on causal inference. He has mostly focused on social science with regards to voting patterns but social science is used in many high-tech companies for social medias.
@metasoft02213 ай бұрын
Thank you for the videos. The story I heard as a student was Nobel's wife was having an affair with a Mathematician, which is why there is no Nobel Math Prize.
@narex4563522 күн бұрын
Great video! I'm very curious how the CR bound interacts with the infamous bias-variance tradeoff. I wish you had time to go deeper on the finer points of some of these breakthroughs, but I guess that's the nature of a 'best of' compilation like this :)
@very-normal22 күн бұрын
The CR bound exists for unbiased estimators, so it gives you a theoretical bound for how good an unbiased estimator can be. For a fixed bias (i.e. none), anything meeting it will have the lowest variance / best efficiency. But people have since realized that allowing for a little bit of bias can create valuable estimators due to an outsized drop in variance. I think LASSO and ridge regression are the most famous examples of this.
@wesleyd.48593 ай бұрын
Remember, data is only random from a frequentist perspective. Data is fixed according to Bayesian statistics!
@qwerty111111223 ай бұрын
A topic thats fascinated me for a long time is the statistics of persuasion. How strong does the evidence need to be to persuade people one way or another? Of course, rhetoric is the main way we persuade other people, but it's a nice thought experiment and a very bayesian challenge
@AzharLatif-d4z2 ай бұрын
Money ,money, money !
@timothyfriesen48562 ай бұрын
It would be great to see a video on active inference and how it relates to Bayesian statistics
@christianurso72843 ай бұрын
Isnt it disturbing that the fields medal only gives the winner 15000$? I mean math is the base of our infrastructure
@TheThreatenedSwan3 ай бұрын
Doesn't the vast majority not have real applications?
@patrickbateman66203 ай бұрын
@@TheThreatenedSwanMostly yes but the contributions of Paul Cohen, Terrence Tao, Martin Hairer improved software verification and algorithms, medical imaging and climate and financial modelling respectively
@javipdr193 ай бұрын
Thank you Christian. Love all your videos. Thank you for making them, I'm learning a lot
@eliasmai61703 ай бұрын
Statistics is the workhorse for the sciences.
@michaelwangCH3 ай бұрын
The bootstrap and Crémer-Rao lower Bound are most important invention in stats in last century - they deserve the recognitions without doubt. My predition: Nobel Prixe of stats for 2025 is James-Stein Estimator resp. their proofs - that was huge surprise for many statisticians and showed that MLE is not the sufficient estimator and contradict to Crémer-Rao lower bound.
@musaurelius71442 ай бұрын
The prize could be given to Willard D. James since he is alive while Charles Stein isn't. :)
@michaelwangCH2 ай бұрын
Thanks to know that. James and Stein both deserve the prize for their work.
@HaykTarkhanyan3 ай бұрын
Great channel. Good luck and thanks for the videos
@yanvgf3 ай бұрын
Professor Vapnik absolutely deserves this prize 😁I had him in mind from the beginning of the video!
@TheThreatenedSwan3 ай бұрын
Where's the Galton prize? Or at least one after Pearson
@foobargorch3 ай бұрын
5 categories, economics is named after the two novel prize
@richardslater6773 ай бұрын
Has any statistician come up with a statistical function that predicts, with any certainty, their chances of winning the International Prize in Statistics.
@yashagrahari3 ай бұрын
Loved the content! Beautifully explained !!
@lylemorris21013 ай бұрын
You get hierarchical modeling and the variance of estimates (almost) for free with Bayesian analysis. Take the Bayes pill and make a video about it.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
ya boi is fully pilled up, a hierarchical model video would be a good one
@CaribouDataScience3 ай бұрын
Who said, "all models are wrong, but some are useful"?
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
I think it’s usually attributed to statistician George Box
@housamkak80053 ай бұрын
it is sad that fields medal gives only 15k
@pfizerpflanze3 ай бұрын
A question: i(θ) isn't just an approximation of the variance of the MLE based on asymptotical results, and moreover MLEs are very often biased because of Jensen inequality or other reasons, so there could be either unbiased as/more efficient estimators or more efficient biased estimators than the MLE. Am I wrong? I also saw a video about James Stein estimator for example, which doesn't take the MLE to get more efficient *Edit: my broken screen and my poor sight prevented me from seeing the bottom note
@pichirisu3 ай бұрын
Well thank god no one told them CS exists or else we'd have an arbitrary prize for the easiest form of applied math.
@dekumarademosater27622 ай бұрын
Nobel had a wife. She had a lover. He was a mathematician. So, no Nobel Prize for mathematics or mathematicians.
@very-normal2 ай бұрын
Google told me this wasn’t true
@dekumarademosater27622 ай бұрын
Well ... Google _might_ be right.
@RaRdEvA2 ай бұрын
Great video
@kristianwichmann99963 ай бұрын
Well, I knew Florence Nightingale, but I was pretty sure she was not the one to win this 😄
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
lol have you read The Lady Tasting Tea by David Salsburg by chance
@barttrudeau92373 ай бұрын
That was super interesting, thank you!
@awesomethegreatamazing26513 ай бұрын
What’s the background music
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
I looked up “calm music” on Storyblocks and took a track that I liked
@erinomani9105Ай бұрын
Actally the economics prize is not a Nobel. It's officially the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences and was not part of the will of Alfred Nobel Just so the economist could sneak their beak in. Curiously enough The Nobel Foundation threatened legal action for a proposed "Michael Nobel Energy Award" " To the Nobel Foundation the 'Dr. Michael Nobel Award' represents a clear misuse of the reputation and goodwill of the Nobel Prize and the associations of integrity and eminence that has been created over time and through the efforts of the Nobel Committees"
@duckymomo79353 ай бұрын
what is the difference between biostatistics and biostatics?
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
biostatistics is applying statistics to biological contexts, biostatics is when I can’t pronounce the former correctly
@tree_eats2 ай бұрын
"Biostatistics" Oh god, there's a biology degree with even more statistics? That's straight up masochism.
@very-normal2 ай бұрын
It’s less biology and more so trying to translate biomedical ideas into statistical models But yes, dealing with doctors on statistics has an element of masochism to it sometimes
@parthkanani73233 ай бұрын
Judea Pearl for the 2025 prize?
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
solid guess! My causal inference guess was Donald Rubin, but I stuck with my ML guess
@AubreyBarnard2 ай бұрын
I expect Pearl wouldn't be nominated because he already won the Turing Award.
@braineaterzombie39813 ай бұрын
C.R rao prolly my fav statistician
@Bulacanos3 ай бұрын
There should be absolutely no award for economics whatsoever, what a fudged up "field"
@byronwatkins25653 ай бұрын
You really should research your stories. Nobel intentionally omitted mathematics because a mathematics scoundrel stole his wife.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
Lol the irony of this statement
@clumsycapy3 ай бұрын
nobel never had a wife as he never got married
@Leila0S3 ай бұрын
I think we need to talk Christian. If there’s away where I can talk to you privately, I would love to talk to you.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
no thank you
@monster4343 ай бұрын
Hey, this is an amazing video! Cheers to these great statisticians. Rao taught one of lecturers in undergrad. He could never stop speaking so highly of him!
@XxAssassinYouXx3 ай бұрын
Can we get a video on the Jackknife method or on MCMC?
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
Yeah! I’ve been cooking up an MCMC type of video for some time now. Jackknife would be cool too, tho it’s been overshadowed by the bootstrap I feel. Could be a part of a bigger video!
@XxAssassinYouXx3 ай бұрын
@@very-normal MCMC is used in lattice QCD and quantum gravity. I'd be interested to see in what other fields they're used in.
@wendydewit66843 ай бұрын
great video! I didn't know about the price & i'm doing a master in stats haha
@redoktopus30472 ай бұрын
There is not a nobel prize in economics. it is an award the swedish central bank hands out.
2 ай бұрын
The problem with max likelihood, is that it leads to overtraining
@psl_schaefer2 ай бұрын
Awesome video as always!
@ridwanwase74442 ай бұрын
"I don't think this is true in general. At some level, it's certainly not true if we're talking about the CRLB of unbiased estimators, because the MLE is sometimes biased. For example, in a uniform distribution on [0,theta], the MLE is biased, and the Fisher Information is not even defined. My guess is that this applies for some "location families", which the normal, binomial, poisson would all be. For a "scale family" like the exponential distribution, in the parameterization where the mean is 1/lambda, I do not believe the MLE meets the CRLB." I quote one of my statistics teachers here. So i am confuse d now- is mle estimators always meet crlb?
@very-normal2 ай бұрын
My understanding is that the MLE is asymptotically unbiased and efficient. It can still be the case that the MLE itself will be biased, but this bias will go away as the sample size goes to infinity; likewise it’s variance will also approach the CRLB
@jtuhtan3 ай бұрын
Very nicely presented, I learned a lot and really enjoyed the reasonable pace at which you walked the viewer through the contributions as well as their significance.
@peterhall66563 ай бұрын
I agree with your prediction about Vladimir Vapnik. He would be a worthy recipient. It would also recognise the long term efforts of the Russian probability school.
@lebesgue-integral2 ай бұрын
Nice video! This was very interesting. What about Henderson's linear mixed model equations? It's been used everywhere. The thing is he already died, unfortunately.
@oscarlacueva3 ай бұрын
Isn't Cox's work kind of an extension of GLMs with a particularly useful GLM?
@alexthelion984863 ай бұрын
BRO, thank you for this channel and your work! Truly truly insightful!
@Iachlan3 ай бұрын
use statistics for predicting the winner
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
🧠
@Iachlan3 ай бұрын
@@very-normal nah but seriously though, at least make a shorts with how other prizes are distributed and with some data crunching make statistical predictions especially since you havent done much of those
@Iachlan3 ай бұрын
@@very-normal Also in my textbook, in some questions they use root (n) for t-test and in some places its root (n-1). Standard of error is the root of (variance per statistical individual). There wasnt an explanation as to why root of n-1 is used in some places. lmk asap pls, I have a test on 5th in inferential statistics.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
In general, the one using root(n-1) is more correct than root(n) because it makes the estimator unbiased. I put root(n) here because that’s what you get with the MLE for estimating the variance of normally distributed data.
@Iachlan3 ай бұрын
@@very-normal how does a root of (n-1) make a significant difference? A hypothesis test especially in your sampling sizes is gonna be large. diff between root of n and n-1 is gonna be in the 0.000x probably. Also how does it make it unbiased?! from an undergrad of Aswath Damodaran, my understanding was that bias is an error from human judgement. How can it be reduced if not eliminated by subtracting 1? Im highlighting my ignorance rn, but the days of mean median and mode were far more comprehensible.... I am stuck with the simplest of t-tests 😭😭
@aaronkaw48573 ай бұрын
There's no time to go over survival statistics? Well I'm doomed.
@christianurso72843 ай бұрын
Isnt it disturbing that the fields medal only gives the winner 15000$? I mean math is the base of our infrastructure
@zaydmohammed68053 ай бұрын
Man do I wish you made these videos when I was doing my bachelors in statistics, would've removed a lot of confusion. Still though I really enjoy watching your channel and I hope your goal of making statistics fun for everyone succeeds!
@enysuntra13473 ай бұрын
0:15 and already the first blatant mistake. There is no "Nobel Price", i.e. price funded by Alfred Nobel, for economics. The "Nobel price in Economics" is the Imperial Bank of Sweden price for economics commemorating Alfred Nobel. "Even Peace", however, IS a real Nobel Price, as Nobel thought he had created a weapon so potent wars would no longer be possible (i.e. what in reality are nuclear weapons).
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
cool
@pfizerpflanze3 ай бұрын
WAIT! I found out on Wikipedia that there has been a "Wilks Memorial Award" since the sixties! Famous names I know who won the prize are C.R.Rao, Neyman, Cochran, Snedecor and many others... No Idea of it is reserved only to residents in the US though
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
Actually, I thought about talking about this award and the COPPS Presidents award, but it got removed in the editing process 😅
@taotaotan56713 ай бұрын
My guess would be Donald Rubin, known for his work in propensity score and EM algorithms.
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
Honestly I think Rubin is the best prediction now. I think more statisticians and general researchers would be familiar with his name compared to Vapnik
@PRiKoL1ST13 ай бұрын
Who did invent MLE?)
@very-normal3 ай бұрын
RA Fisher gets credit for popularizing it, but there were a bunch of people before him who made references to it. There’s a paper called “The Epic Story of Maximum Likelihood” by Stephen Stigler that answers your question more thoroughly