VFX Artists DEBUNK Jellyfish UFO Videos

Squarespace ► Head to squarespace.com... to save 10% off your first purchase!
Our videos are made possible by Members of CorridorDigital, our Exclusive Streaming Service! Try a membership yourself with a 14-Day Free Trial ► corridordigital...
The Bunkin' Boys are back! Sam, Wren and Niko sit down to apply their VFX artist's eyes to the internet's latest UFO videos!
More debunking ► • VFX Artists DEBUNK Pen...
Have an unexplainable video you'd like us to bunk? Email us at [e-mail]
Instagram ► / corridordigital
Merch ► corridordigita...
Creative Tools ►
Puget Computers: bit.ly/Puget_S...
Aputure Lights: bit.ly/Corrido...
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/3r0wEnt
ActionVFX: bit.ly/TheBest...
Cinema4D: bit.ly/Try_Cine...
KitBash 3D: KitBash3D.com/...
Houdini: bit.ly/Houdini...
Nuke: bit.ly/Nuke_Co...
Octane Render: bit.ly/Octane_W...
Epidemic Music: bit.ly/Corridor...

[@satudiotv]

Can't wait for Alien to debunk Human Videos.

[@apersunthathasaridiculousl1890]

Corridor! They sometimes debunk cgi videos, I think they’re aliens and this is their cover up

[@sunilbisht]

Psst, humans are not real.

[@Ms.Pronounced_Name]

The Aliens can't start making videos until they win the war against the Reptilians

[@MrShrog]

Let's gooo

[@Kagarin05]

At least theyll give more than just opinions hoepfully

[@Wheelo40]

I am a 10 foot tall dark alien. I’d like to apologize for my brother Larry going to the mall. I told him he would not find sneakers the right size, but typical Larry, he wouldn’t listen.

[@murrayc9615]

Years ago when the Space Shuttle program read still in effect, my family and I (from Nova Scotia, Canada) were visiting Universal Studios' "Universal City Walk" one day near dusk, and we could see the space shuttle taking off from the Kennedy Space Center. The amount of people freaking out and screaming thinking it was a nuclear missile taking off was staggering. I could see a few people being confused, but it was literally EVERYONE within hundreds of feet who were freaking out. I was literally screaming at the top of my lungs "IT'S JUST THE SPACE SHUTTLE" over and over again. When my family and I decided to continue on while people were dropping to their knees and repenting, we stopped in one of the restaurants for dinner, and when we told our server the funny situation, she said "you'd be surprised how many locals don't realize how close we are to the shuttle launches, and they freak out EVERY damn time"

[@tedarcher9120]

Imagine if that'd have happened today, they would have to repent every other day?!

[@RealElevenTimes]

Would've died from laughter if I was in that situation lmao.

[@nawdawg4300]

As a native californian I do not believe this at all. It sounds like utter nonsense. To this day rocket launches are not uncommon and no one freaks out when they happen.

[@TheSnazzyBonobo]

@@nawdawg4300he said years ago, and you have to remember how insane America went after 9/11. I will confirm that I saw people freak out when I saw rocket launches in Florida when I was a child

[@agirlnamedmichael1670]

@@nawdawg4300It certainly wouldn't be "locals" freaking out

[@corymoore8562]

The first one never changes shape, the color changes, but not the shape. The reticle moves, but it looks like a dirt smudge on a lense protector, which would not move...

[@MoonlitAce]

oh my god,,,, oh my god you’re SO RIGHT the camera movement at 1:22 really shows it well this is 100% a smudge on a screen just in front of the camera

[@jimmyholster]

@@MoonlitAce No, no he isn't right. You can't have sharp background focus, and then have semi-sharp focus on something that close to (or on) the lens. To achieve that level of background focus the smudge on the glass would be hugely blurred and borderline transparent. Try it yourself. Get a camera and draw a small line on the lens with a marker. Now go out side and focus on something in the distance - you won't even see the mark you left on the lens in the footage.

[@MoonlitAce]

@@jimmyholster i’m not thinking it’s something on the lens directly, that i know couldn’t possibly show like that. but if it’s a pane of glass several inches or feet in front of the camera then it is still possible

[@revolution6661]

​@@MoonlitAceyou need to see the full minutes of the video... This is really well edited and cut out to confuse

[@otee1625]

The first looks like an imperial probe droid with a wig ;-)

[@brehella770]

I was 100% thinking it looked like a probe droid, wish they would have mentioned it lol

[@Dad......]

I'm like 99 percent sure it's just birdshit on the window they're filming through

[@JoseBarriosPika]

“What we’re seeing here guys… is an award-winning template from SquareSpace! 🤪” HAHAHA (Skip skip skip skip…)

[@JoeSnow84]

x2 xD

[@buffnipz]

Mashing the right arrow key aggressively

[@jordanbentley]

Google "sponsorskip browser extension" ;)

[@peter.36]

It’s not just square space that has award winning templates. Just about every video corridor uploads to their KZbin channel these days could be considered a template

[@Smurfman256]

cough cough *SponsorBlock* cough cough *anti-clickbait add-on* hack wheeze

[@mrroboto18]

I was doing star photography with a friend in the mountains and we thought we saw an alien. After a long time of staring at the sky and getting a feel of the flight patterns nearby and various satellites, a super bright object traversed the entire sky silently that didn't look either and we we're stumped. Until 2 weeks later when we found out it was the ISS. If you are in the dark and it is traversing overhead still in sunlight, it appears like a spotlight in the sky

[@professorx3060]

I misread photography 😅

[@Atrainsd]

Same thing happened to me and some friends doing Astro photography back in 2017 in the mountains. We were packing up getting ready to go when we spotted some objects super dim but way up in atmosphere flying around. At first it looked like a massive satellite formation until they split up and started just flying around. We stayed for hours until sunset watching them way way up there you could tell they were bright but they were so far away. It was hard to keep track of them at some points in the middle of the millions of stars we could see that night. They are real and also the jelly fish was seen entering the water along with active camouflage as it wasn’t visible to the naked eye and the weapons systems could not lock on. Active jamming

[@rhadamantesomething3020]

I've also seen it (was actively looking for it, IIRC there's a website that tracks it) and it hauls ass. It's not as fast a shooting star but it's fast. And in my case, it started dim, got brighter and brighter and then dimmed again.

[@mineduck3050]

Not every ufo sighting is people confusing satellites. Valid reports dont just consist of objects traversing the sky on one trajectory. You know this, right? Your ancedote doesnt debunk the ufo phenomena, just the light you saw that one time.

[@declandougan7243]

@@mineduck3050Calm down bro, you’re rambling.

[@danr543]

Wren, Sam, and Niko are aliens who debunk these videos so we don't become aware that they walk among us😂

[@bubblesculptor]

The only logical explanation!

[@GrimJackal]

Honestly, this makes as much sense as most other claims from the UAP crowd.

[@SeriouslyNotTom]

among us

[@thingonathinginathing]

No they're probably just on Mike Turners payroll lol

[@biasneeze]

@@SeriouslyNotTom among us

[@danielx15one]

The thing about the military released UAP is that it doesn't show up visually, they had to capture it in infrared. So, it appears to lose heat at one point.. which gives it that disappearing, translucent effect.

[@rumrunner8019]

Yeah. I mean, what balloon changes heat signature that quickly and can't be spotted visually? That's what this "debunking" video ignores. It's like how people said the "tic tac" object was just space junk falling out of orbit. None of the "debunkers" even mentioned that the trained pilot who took the video hit it with radar and the thing jammed the radar. Space junk doesn't do that. Not saying it's aliens, just saying there isn't any good explanation

[@amd64x]

Imagine when Copernicus tried to tell everyone that the sun is actually the centre of solar system , i bet there are tons of people trying to debunk that.

[@oneofmanyjames-es1643]

And they failed because the evidence was strong. UFO evidence is always weak as a homeopathic beer. The least a UFO hunter could do is: 1) Provide the original files 2) Film in a higher resolution than 240p 3) Give time and location data A miracle among UFO videos, apparently.

[@Andytlp]

@@oneofmanyjames-es1643 1st I'd wager only film cameras could capture any kind of alien technology, cause it's far more crude than digital cameras but i'm not certain of that either. They might just overexpose the film somehow or not appear in it at all. 2nd Logically thinking, we exist, so another intelligent life form has to exist somewhere out there. The problem is, distances are mind boggling. So we could be too far apart. Even if aliens we're somewhere in our galaxy it's still dozens to thousands of light years away. Assuming life as we know it only forms on earth like planets. Given the age of earth and our technology, aliens could be either far more advanced or still in the dinosaur or single cell organisms. Theres also a huge chance that our rate of technology advancement rate is special and there could be alien civilizations far longer lived than ours who are still as advanced as someone from middle ages even after having tens of thousands or millions of years of head start. 3rd.Lastly, if life is common in the universe and hyper advanced aliens exist with light speed or faster than light travel methods, then to them exploring less advanced planets would be like taking a trip to the zoo or getting groceries or even worse or one level down, observing ants with a magnifying glass and one further down, scientist looking at microbes with a 1000x magnification. Not only you wouldn't know youre being observed, you'd never see any evidence of it. Because they might not even have to be physically here. Even if they we're they could be either totally invisible or phase through matter. Mastering space flight to such degree would not only mean just that but mastery of pretty much all science fields to the limits. Erasing any trace of themselves even if detected, digitally or human memories. Even as i write this drivel i know that it could be all nonsense and completely outside of human concepts or experience. Because word alien doesnt just mean some unknown being/person but completely different than anything you know or can conjure up in your imagination. Our science is pretty accurate, that much we might have in common. Except to their standards, the most complex theorems or workings of the universe we know might be something they dont even teach to their toddlers because its more or less common sense. Due to vastly higher iq or some implanted bio/mechanical enhancement. Genetic engineering and so on.

[@Hedgehogking5]

Those jellys made me think of starcraft Overlords. "We require more Minerals!" "Spawn more Overlords"

[@Halomasterchief16]

The aliens are just trying to scout whether they can rush our base

[@fvckingtest]

WE REQUIRE MORE VESPENE GAS....SSSS

[@artificial4612]

While the humans are like "They came from.... BEHIND!" 😂

[@Surannhealz]

It’s all fun and games until the carrier has arrived.

[@milescoleman910]

No newbie, no rsh

[@KeKe-bv8qv]

That Bugs Bunny balloon really got me. I thought it was a joke and had to pause the video for a closer look XD

[@karlmcgowan9375]

Did you notice that it's bird shit on the camera dome.

[@koschanothere]

I can't wait for Jordan to sneak another one of his videos into one of these debunks! He could definitely trick them!!

[@mickeydangerez]

didn't even get that far, hogwash episode.

[@StefanCreates]

@@mickeydangerez get how far?

[@Noobasaurus]

The initial video extends beyond 30 minutes in duration, featuring segments where the object traverses over water, submerges for approximately 17 minutes, resurfaces gradually, and swiftly departs. Nevertheless, it's somewhat incredulous to attribute such behavior to a cluster of balloons drifting above a military installation.

[@kadekea931]

I don’t think the military jellyfish video is balloons simply because the lower half doesn’t move, which they would be, certainly if the wind was pushing them

[@Ceruleannn]

yeah it actually blows my mind that people actually believe that balloons move like that. they don't.

[@kingcosworth2643]

It turns out it was balloons and the bottom section is a sign with writing. It's a standard celebration balloon package from some sort of middle eastern milestone. Someone was having a party and the balloons got away

[@kadekea931]

@@kingcosworth2643 point me to a video or source?

[@CianLikesMen]

Damn its crazy how much effort goes into people trying to convince you that aliens are real

[@TrophyGuide101]

Black budget from the CIA to hide the real aliens.

[@oopsurdeadm8]

are you implying that aliens are not real whatsoever? You believe we are the only organic, sentient and intelligent beings within billions of Galaxies? Do you also believe the earth is 2024 years old?

[@Lukasaske]

But why? Seems like that's the REAL conspiracy theory.

[@MadameCirce]

​@@TrophyGuide101I'm sure the Bugs Bunny balloon floating down the street at night was just an expensive CIA psyop to trick the masses. That makes perfect sense and isn't just a load of paranoid bollocks.

[@analogecstasy4654]

@@TrophyGuide101Or maybe Americans like you are just primed to believe ANY conspiracy theory, as long as there’s almost NO evidence!

[@0J0E]

Yeah, I've been waiting for you guys to debunk that '3 people walking side by side". 😂 Now I can sleep in peace.

[@inventgineer]

Lmao 😂, Sam's expression at 3:07 is great -it mirrors exactly how I was feeling, too, when the object in question doesn't vanish or disappear so much as it seems obviously cut out of the video from one frame to the next 😄. Also, Wren's advert setup was f*ckin' GOLD 👌😆. I absolutely love these UFO debunk videos, btw. It is such a FANTASTIC lil brainteaser for we the audience -a fun game/puzzle to solve; great brain exercise! ....Also, ngl, it's always hilarious to see JUST how much the average person's DESIRE to BELIEVE so significantly overwhelms what their ACTUAL senses are INFORMING them of.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

As is always emphasized... UNIDENTIFIED flying Objects are an every day occurrence (and so banale that for a century they are at the base of the Superman catchphrase "is it a bird, is it a plane, no it is Superman"). Simply to jump to an "Alien spacship" conclusion though is NOT warranted simply because something is seemingly unidentifiable. Nor is claiming that something looks like it does something impossible, as you usually lack lots of necessary information (like zoomfactor, camera angle, movement speed of the camera etc) to actually determine WHAT would be "possible"...

[@inventgineer]

@@Ugly_German_Truthsikr, how hilarious is it (not even as a moral reflection on the individual so much as a hilarious inborne programming broadly applied to a population) that people so often rush to the conclusion that the impossible or extremely unlikely is occurring. *Average Person Be Like:* "HMMMM, what is more likely? 🤔That everything we understand is wrong (about certain rules of nature like gravity, friction, etc etc -which have held true in seemingly EVERY instance among COUNTLESS, COUNTLESS instances; that anthropomorphic aliens suddenly exist and are reaching out where they never did, etc)? ......OR....that a human is attempting to dupe or troll other humans, or I just don't fully understand yet? 🧠⚡ CLEARLY IT IS MORE LIKELY THAT ALMOST EVERYTHING WE KNEW FOR MILLENNIA IS WRONG.......cuz humans would never trick each other or make mistakes -that never happens." 😂😂

[@cylon5741]

@@inventgineer Regarding the Tic Tac incident, what did the naval aviators see with their own eyes? Did the four persons in the two planes have a shared hallucination?

[@vinniecartermusic]

Ladies and gentlemen this comment is what happens when the dunning kruger effect is left unchecked. This mentality is about as bad as the hardcore ufo believers out there and it’s completely unscientific. If the likes of Corridor Crew, yourself and other hard nosed skeptics were actually arguing in good faith you’d see that what you are doing now is completely belittling a subject that is worthy of proper, sensible deconstruction. The fact Corridor Crew make these videos is just a blatant display of ego. A debunking process, if it were to be taken seriously, needs to be built atop a substrate of scientific methodology. Who out of any of these guys sitting on this couch are 1. Scientists or 2. Trained observers? A cgi/vfx artist is not a trained observer. If their opinion were valid then all of the top VFX artists who “proved” classic ufo videos to be real should have equal validity. Do you see the contradiction and the logical fallacy here? If you needed to know what chocolate tasted like would 1. Listen to someone who made one in a computer? Or 2. The person that made it in real life? There are proper scientists looking into this, not crazy people, Nobel prize winning and tenured professors (not Loeb). For you to have such glee at a bunch of VFX artists confirming your bias and then go on to blindly accept their conclusion and be happy with it just proves most people aren’t willing to treat this topic seriously or have deliberately chosen to ignore the plethora of data waiting to be sifted through. What was the saying, facts don’t care about your feelings? Go look at the proper research being done not KZbin videos.

[@vinniecartermusic]

@@inventgineerso essentially the philosophy you’re arguing here is Occam’s razor. So tell me then how was gallileo supposed to convince the academic elite/Catholic Church that the heliocentric model was the correct model? Surely he should’ve been wrong if Occam’s razor is always the correct logical path right? Surely it’s much simpler to look up at the sky and say him we stay still and the sun moves… we are the centre. These are the types of logical fallacies that breed knee jerk reactions to topics like this. This topic needs a mature discussion. Instead of just saying “oh well it seems so impossible so then it’s impossible” how about changing that to thinking about how it IS possible? I dunno, like every single R&D pathway for every single successful company in the s&p500? There’s a great hypothesis by a man called Robin Hanson (not kooky conspiracy guy) which essentially postulates the theory of a panspermia sibling. It would explain why they can be so close to us. No physics defying FTL travel here. The motive for being here? Subtle but potent enforce of Non-expansionist ideas. Where do we find examples of that? Modern civilisation/decolonisation. If you marry that with the theories of Jacques Vallee the man who has researched the most UFO encounters/crashes in the world. You’ll see there’s logic that checks out. He postulates that whatever it is, is replicated the actions of an intelligence trying to install a System of Control. A system to control what? Perhaps non-expansion. Look, the bottom line is this. You can choose to be dismissive and belittling of the topic, fine. But at least be truly and honestly read up on the material. The best skeptics are the ones that know more about the believers own beliefs than they do. And judging by your comments, they’re naive assumptions about the UFO/UAP phenomenon at best. The extraterrestrial hypothesis as an origin for the phenomenon is, atleast according to the data, naive. It’s far more complicated.

[@mbm3930]

The jellyfish UFO are balloons that Can go invisible in the infrared, then go into the ocean, then comes out the water and shoots off… different kind of balloons

[@Dad......]

The first one is literally a smudge on the glass in front of the camera lmao.

[@trippyyoke]

If it were a smudge it would stay in exactly the same spot in frame and it doesn't. It's also a thermal camera picking up its heat signature and it looks to be rapidly changing temperature as you can see it going from light to dark back and forth. I'm not saying it's forsure an alien but it's definitely not a smudge. It's some sort of drone technology most likely but who knows maybe an alien or some sort of interdimensional being. 300 years ago we would have called it a god or demon so really whatever you want to call it 😅👽👹

[@teIezet]

smudge on the lens that changes temperature from hot to cold multiple times, is confirmed to be seen on multiple occasions by the soldiers present at the base & can be seen going behind objects? okay.

[@Dad......]

@@teIezet No it isn't, lol and no it wasn't. You made that shit up. I know a smudge on a glass when I see one my guy. Look at it again, this time with your eyes open.

[@ErikStewart]

This series is awesome! Please keep them coming!

[@lfro15]

I can't believe Dr. Choy made it into a Corridor video! Peruvian representation on this series keeps growing lol. He used to have a radio program about paranormal activity and he's very popular here, between people who believe him, and those who just like his storytelling

[@FTFO_Media]

Mid 2000’s there was the Honeywell RQ-16A T-Hawk VTOL drone that just looks like a flying trash can. Could see them on deployments hovering or moving around.

[@Alucard45000]

Any video with an Unidentified Flying Object is a UFO, so technically any plane, helicopter, bird, bat or satellite people see or film can be a UFO if they don't know what it is. XD

[@valentinsuska9784]

Imperial Probe Droid

[@GabieGames]

I thought I was the only one

[@Scudboy17]

I used to work with an insurance agent in a small town in Texas at the time the shuttle Columbia burned up on re-entry in 2003. I was on the with him as it was happening, and he and I both knew what it was, but I could hear people outside his office screaming and yelling as it was happening. The agent had to set the phone down to go calm his staff and neighbors. They were yelling about it being the apocalypse, a Russian nuclear attack, alien invasion, and more. One lady in his office was on the verge of a nervous breakdown or a heart attack she was so scared. In a way I don't blame them. That town was directly in the glide path of the shuttle as it broke up and it was LOUD as it broke appart. RIP Charlie, he was a good guy, died of an aneurysms a couple of years later. It's crazy how peoples imagination jumps to the wildest ideas when under stress. Someone needs to make a disposable Ochams Razor for times like that.

[@CDXLIV444]

If our military can't lock onto a bundle of balloons then they definitely couldn't be responsible for the objects that have been reported.

[@warpeace8891]

I agree, it is amazing how so many people believe other peoples bullshit. Religion is still going strong despite the absurdities that are apparent to rational thinking people. It is increasingly embarrassing to be part of this species and it misadventures.

[@jelokin1]

Sams glasses give me so much joy, his style of humor really shines in these videos.

[@stockvillain]

Holy crap! I was stationed at Al Taqqadum in '02 or '03 as a Marine Air Traffic Controller. There was, and most likely still is, a weather balloon there. I don't recall seeing anything unexplainable on watch, but we did get mortared regularly.

[@sugarrookieart]

W-what? ​@@samholdsworth420

[@prodigy455]

Not sure if you mean aerostat or not but no our only location now in Iraq is Al Asad and the rest are in Syria and Africa .. not much on weather though mainly surveillance.

[@cylon5741]

Investigative journalist Jeremy Corbell released this video. Have you considered what he and George Knapp had to say about it? As I understand it, the Jellyfish UFO was not visible to those on the ground, even those who had night vision equipment.

[@1lapmagic]

Can you point out another weather balloon that looks like this and travels in this way?

[@prodigy455]

@@1lapmagic I’m thinking he means the aerostat , people confuse us with all types of things and weather being one of them.

[@2degucitas]

"Got a mylar balloon and helium? "Yes" "Let's add a ghillie suit. That'll really mess them up."

[@Satellaview1889]

12:16 "There's still wonder in the world, it just might not be the aliens." -Niko Pueringer I love this quote so much, because it perfectly encapsulates why these theories become popular. They are a convenient way to process what's out there, rather than putting in the time to seek the interesting things out ourselves. There's stuff out there just as interesting as these videos, they're just a lot more down to earth.

[@1lapmagic]

Well, actually, the "theories" became popular because of the plurality of evidence, hundreds of thousands of sightings dating back (and depicted for) millennia, and excessive number of high-ranking, highly-credentialed people who directly state the existence of the phenomenon. Since you seem to advocate a "thinking outside the box" approach, can you name a time when you've done that? You are shutting down modes of thought, not exploring them. Do you possess considerable scientific formal education? I do.

[@Satellaview1889]

@@1lapmagic Mm hmm. Sure.

[@cf7571]

@@1lapmagic "Considerable scientific formal education" Yes, I have a PhD in theoretical physics. What do you have? Other than a very good chunk of trust in "high-ranking people" who, like all government officials, have a good deal of incentive to lie and very little incentive to tell the truth.

[@J_C95]

@@Satellaview1889 He's right, please don't pretend like you have an informed understanding of the topic. Your original comment is so meaningless and condescending it comes off as narcissistic. A lot of people smarter than you have a different understanding.

[@J_C95]

@@cf7571 A huge amount of generals/admirals, pilots, high ranking DOD, research scientists etc with good reputations. You're still implying the existence of a massive conspiracy, there would have to be a concerted effort to reach all these people, who have a reputation for trustworthiness and honesty, and get them to tell a story at the expense of their reputation. Your point about government officials is reductive and useless. You can assess each case of testimony based on the incentives present. Many of these testimonies are backed up by some physical evidence as well.

[@EricFullerton]

"We sure like to invent things from blurry pixels don't we?" This is how Stable Diffusion works!

[@SteelDown]

It is a test video for a cargo net that is hard to see by the necked eye. Someone dug this out of the archives and thought it was something it is not lol.

[@JonahHax]

but how does Unstable Fusion works?

[@whtchocolate7997]

What?!? Lmao 🤣 speaking of inventing things. You just invented the obvious fact that you have no clue what stable diffusion even is.

[@JonahHax]

@@whtchocolate7997 whooosh

[@dramklukkel]

What's that? Utah:" Angels". California: "Aliens". Canada:"Bigfoot". Europe: "dunno, dont care." Russia: "our secret weapon". Corridor: "actually..."

[@abe4214]

For VFX experts I am surprised these guys didn't mention anything about the fact that the first jellyfish video was shot using IR camera and that the object was invisible to human eyes. Interestingly it was hot and cold multiple times.

[@kstarler]

2:57 Proof that the aliens walk among us! You can clearly see the jellyfish tendrils dangling from Wren's ears! His brain is gone!

[@amogusamongus]

Indeed

[@kingwarrop]

I didn’t skip the ad this time. You deserve it with that move you pulled Wren!

[@BernardoPC117]

0:55 that first one to me looks very close to the lens, like bird poop on a cristal protecting the actual lens.

[@robbanb7507]

I think you're right.

[@ElijahLiving]

The actual UAP footage is 40 minutes long and it went in the water and back out with high speed

[@harshkhanna2219]

If the jellyfish ufo was actually balloons, why did the US army claim it was invisble to naked eye and on the thermal camera it kept switching from hot and cold.

[@DavidEsp1]

Re 2nd Q, the thermal camera's auto exposure setting changedu according to the background (average or something like that) temperature. The shades of grey of the jellyfish (making only a small part of that average) are relative to that (changing) background.

[@AmandaBrookover-d3r]

Nope... There are plenty of times it passes in front of dark black background and it didn't change. Also, our military must have crap for targeting systems to protect our soldiers. What if this object was actively trying to blend in to the background like an octopus. DARPA has worked on things like that as a type of stealth. These guys might just be the reason flat earthers say everything is CGI, like space, I.S.S. , stars, and satellite photos of the Earth!!

[@PeterBrodersen]

Today I learned that some police vehicles' emergency lights are synchronized and run on the same time schedule (8:20). Apparently [ = what I managed to google in a couple of seconds] for about three years there has been a couple of vendors to provide synchronized lights and sound, such as SoundOff Signal's bluePRINT Sync, and Federal Signal's On Scene sync module. They usually just have a GPS receiver to get the time and flash accordingly to a schedule. Fun fact: Even several wind turbines have GPS mounted. This is for the same reason: To have the light synchronized which gives a less annoying view over a large wind farm, as well as helping pilots assess the total size of the farm at once.

[@mikereed007]

That is insane. I never would have thought of that but it makes total sense. If you lived anywhere NEAR a field of windmills, if they all blinked randomly, that would be infuriatingly annoying. But if they all were synced, it would be just one constant blink that would be tolerable.

[@leafleap]

First clip looks like bird dropping, the camera is probably inside a protective glass dome of some sort and the smear is on the outside. The dome is likely fastened to the camera housing so when the camera is panning the smear seems to move with the perspective, if they panned the camera the other direction then the smear would appear to change direction. The camera looks to have some free range of motion inside the housing, as the cross hair seems to move independently from the smear, but only by a few degrees.

[@mickeydangerez]

Yeah exactly @CorridorCrew didn't even show the second video of this alleged object. If its not poop it's a very small chip that looks funky when zoomed in. I think rebels shot at it.

[@Willowofdarkness19]

Smudge on glass is my immediate thought on this. No reason why it wouldn't be.

[@Yea___]

You should maybe look into it. They ruled out that theory immediately, and it's fucking silly how many people jump to that assumption and stick to it like a grand revelation

[@Yea___]

​@Willowofdarkness19 "no reason" please just look it up why are you people making baseless assertions

[@mickeydangerez]

@@Yea___ who?

[@powerfuldreams]

I like how you left out the part for the 1st UFO that reports are soldiers on the ground did not see the balloons. So if you have eyewitnesses, who didn’t see it was a balloon flying right above them how can we definitively say it was a balloon just because it didn't zip off?

[@jaroslavpesek6642]

Logicaly if no one on the ground saw it, it means the object has to be directly in front of the camera. It could be two things. Dirt on the cover of the camera or crack.

[@supertuesday600]

They didn't see it doesn't mean it's not there. Just that he failed to notice the balloons.

[@BigHammer_]

It was also said that it could only be seen with IR

[@JamesTyler-b8s]

You forgot to " debunk" the part of the jellyfish video, where it goes underwater for 17 minutes, come back out, hovers for a few moments & then darts off.... You forgot that part didn't you...? Oh & the video was taken in infrared, so it's definitely not baloons or iron man... Nice Try fellas....

[@supertuesday600]

@@JamesTyler-b8s are u dreaming in magic dimension? Theres NO video footage of UF0 that went under water, and came back up to dart off. Its just Verbal accounts. But no evidence to prove. And by the way , the black thing hover over water is a duck flying over water. And not the same shape as the 'jelly fish' ufo

[@Simplyjordann]

Lmao wren “i found a video thats higher quality that than this” proceeds to show a worse quality video hahaha

[@thnkpd1]

These simpletons really think the U.S military is going to confuse balloons for a ufo? Waste of time watching them.

[@efugee]

wow, really in depth. "looks like a bunch of balloons"

[@MerchantOfClicks]

pretty sure these guys are a counterintelligence front to squash public interest.

[@Grommo]

That's because all evidence supports that's exactly what they are . They are drifting at the same measured speed and direction as the smooth and laminar 10mph breeze that day that that drifted undisturbed by any turbulence across the flat and featureless desert from the Bagdad suburbs . The group of objects moves exactly the same manner expected by a cluster of balloons in smooth laminar breeze over flat surfaces at such height above ground induced wind gradient . They are exactly the same size as a cluster of Eid holiday balloons, ie less that 6ft high and 3ft wide and with gaps between them. There was no call to defensive positions and they just drifted for 17mins far out over the lake until they were too small to be seen and did NOT plunge into water at any time nor shoot up into the sky. Its iR detail is consistent with foil balloons that reflect the iR of their background the way a mirror does. Only a perfect blackbody object emits an iR signature that is of its own temperature alone. This is really BASIC science and I suspect its hard for these guys to realise just how ignorant of simple optics/physics and logic many of the commenters are on topics like these. Like seriously, do they really need to spell out that if you measure photons from a mirrored object's surface your reading will be of the things the object reflects. ?? If they had to compensate for every elementary school dropout dunce their video would need to be 2hours long

[@MerchantOfClicks]

a bunch of balloons that prevented the FLIR and the aerostat radar from locking on, as well as not being visible with the naked eye? okay, buddy. @@Grommo

[@Grommo]

@@MerchantOfClicks Why on earth do you think anyone would see such a tiny

[@Neervaanistan]

@@MerchantOfClicks You shouldn’t be sounding this smug for how wrong you are 1.The balloons are most likely foil ones which as seen in the video only reflect the IR signature of their surroundings which is too faint to be locked to 2.The frequencies used by a Radar are not weak enough to be reflected by a bunch of balloons. Even if they could reflect Radar the Pulse Doppler effect radars used by observation blimps like this one filter out anything they detect moving at wind speed or slower(like a bunch of balloons) 3.Of course they couldn’t see them this video was taken at night

[@TheOozaki]

A bunch of balloons going in and out of water as seen in the full video? Some really advanced transmedium balloons then! 🎈

[@mrbrianoblivion]

Have you seen the full video?

[@Reptilianoverlord-jc8mt]

They’re Islamic balloons with crescents 🌙 on top and few stars and Eid words on the bottom

[@scandalouslando204]

Balloons elevate also. The jellyfish thing was not gaining any altitude. These guys are dumb not watching this channel again.

[@Werewolf914]

One of my Coworkers was asking me yesterday if I'd seen the Alien video from Miami where there was a giant Alien that was probably 20 feet tall and was saying she couldn't think of anyway to explain but I hadn't seen it so great timing for this video 😆

[@J_C95]

Alot of people into the UFO topic think at least some of the ridiculous rumors/videos are created by the government to discredit the topic overall. It would be pretty standard counterintelligence work.

[@fvckingtest]

I live in Miami, and please for the love of god, we dont need this kind of publicity! 😂😂

[@MMXX_CE]

@@fvckingtest Aye it's too late. GTA 6 already got teased. Everybody has Miami in the back of their mind.

[@jamesm28]

These guys have debunked the Miami alien video

[@ToddJambon]

You got 'em, guys. The military should hire you to debunk everything. We'll never hear about ufos again.

[@ProperBadger]

The first one is 100% an imperial probe droid brah. Vader’s still looking for the rebels in our timeline

[@julianpaglione801]

If the jellyfish ufo was a bunch of Mylar balloons moving with the wind, why isn’t there any individual motion between the balloons? The entire object is completely static, with no motion you would see with a bunch of balloons tied together… explain please. Love your channel guys

[@mickeydangerez]

Exactly there was no analytical thinking in this one. *thumbs down*

[@SkyHammackDrones]

​@@mickeydangerezbut they FEEL it's mylar balloons, so it must be true!

[@leetri]

@@SkyHammackDrones but you FEEL it's aliens, so it must be true!

[@pewpewDino]

It's the birdpoopp on the tracking camera's lense

[@cobyandcoby8556]

Do you guys lack intelligence?! The first video of the Jelly fish UAP is not visible to the naked eye. It was only detectable through the Infrared sensor. Again, naked to the human eye. It is not a bunch of balloons, even if it was it would still show cloaking technology. Also balloons would remain a constant color in IR. Come on yall, improve your logic!

[@DestroyahTheBanned]

It's a bug or dirt smudge. It doesn't show up on anything except IR because the smudge or dirt or bug is only on the IR camera. Easy.

[@wselander]

Kinda amazing the kind of friendship Niko and Sam have - to still get such genuine laughs out of life long friends is a talent!

[@BigStinker_14]

No, it’s normal.

[@hellerart]

@@BigStinker_14 Then you are blessed with good friend as it should be

[@DrButthugger]

Wisconsin/Michigan bros (doesn’t matter which state because they’re both states that don’t matter)

[@DrButthugger]

Bruh that reveal at 5:57

[@parsnipguy2986]

That Dr Anthony Choy one was the best one yet, I’m still not 100% sure it’s bugs bunny

[@RonHarrisMe]

I love these guys so much. TRUTH TELLING is a rarity on KZbin. These guys ALWAYS bring the receipts.

[@BooksRebound]

So I actually spoke with ghosts and they told me aliens dont exist here on earth. Sorry guys.

[@allthingsparanormal4109]

I literally did the same with the Ouija board and they said yes they do. So you must have been talking to a pretty stupid ghost.

[@chilleroftheknight]

Or it was trolling​@@allthingsparanormal4109

[@justinh2832]

I like how the chandelier one got buried

[@Lezdethka-np2bq]

?

[@1eyedwilli3]

Combat vet here. In Iraq a number of times we saw blue metallic orbs following us or just buzzing buy. We never saw the jellyfish, but we saw stuff.

[@matthewc8241]

These guys really want a simplistic answer to these. Strange how despite large amounts of testimony (including in front of congress!) that they really try and put out trite answers like ‘its a balloon’. Do they think soldiers were just freaking out over every single thing that they saw in the skies? Or that they were too dumb to maybe, look up and grab balloons?

[@Yea___]

These people in the comments are exactly like the conspiracy theory stereotypes they foist unto others. It makes me 🫤

[@ryanmacarthur6250]

Drones

[@JOW_2022]

So the professional debunking of VFX-Artists is: "uhm ... I think its a bunch of balloons" ...

[@rocknreplay]

Do you really need to debunk a video called Jellyfish UFO?! LOL

[@lordcola-3324]

Thats a Zerg Overlord!

[@KING_PHILLIP]

Ah, I see you are a man of culture 😂

[@ChallengingRiff]

This was fascinating! Enjoyed watching every second of it. You guys clearly love what you do…

[@LickVIP]

🛸❤️💪THANK YOU FOR SAVING ME AND MY FRIENDS DAY AND NIGHTS OF LIVES BECAUSE IF IT WAS NOT FOR THIS DEBUNKED VIDEO EVERY-TIME WE ARE UNDER THE INFLUENCE WE GO DOWN THE “JELLY FISH RABBIT HOLE 🛸 “

[@terryguin9529]

Bugs bunny was a guy riding a bike

[@solarsailcraftx]

The only problem with the saying the first video was balloons is that the object was only visible to thermal imaging. It was not visible to the naked eye.

[@MissHunniebee]

How could it be a bunch of balloons? The thing is symmetrical, no balloons floating independently or bouncing off each other. Mylar balloon would rotate at least a little or not go in such a straight path.

[@eblgraphics]

Great job guys on all the videos except the jellyfish one. That one was not debunked at all.

[@AdamusPrime76]

Yup, almost like they were paid or something

[@JROD082384]

They have debunked jack shit to date. A classic case of capabilities not being as strong as they perceive themselves to be.

[@Grommo]

They and others have debunked the Jellyfish Vid 100%. It's a bunch of Eid balloons let loose from a celebration. We know for a FACT it is less than 2m high and less than a metre wide. it travels at only 10mph or less in the exact same direction and speed the wind was blowing that day at that time. It behaves EXACTLY the way a cluster of novelty letter balloons behaves and at no point did any military report claim it plunged into the ocean nor shoot up into the air. Nothing about its behaviour otr the way the aperture of the camera changes exposure and relative brightness of the balloons is unusual in any way to KNOWLEDGEABLE people. No attempt was made by anyone at the base to shoot it down or take action because it was obviously balloons behaving like balloons. The utter desperation of gullible quasi-cultist people to find mystery in the mundane is pathetic.

[@AdamusPrime76]

@@Grommo false

[@Grommo]

@@AdamusPrime76 ROFLMAO. You need to articulate a coherent argument if you want your denial to be taken with any seriousness. Since I have stated a number of facts that are indisputably true just based on the laws of optics and perspective. Your single word blanket response is laughable and kind of pathetic . Do better.

[@LemonyFresh]

Please follow up when Corbell releases the extended jellyfish footage that shows it submerging in the water while remaining static. He talked about it this week on Steve-O's podcast.

[@noneck3099]

what's the holdup on releasing it?.....still editing the doctored footage?

[@oz1751]

@@noneck3099As somebody who’s trending away from skepticism on the UFO topic, I enjoyed the sensible insight these 3 video experts shared throughout. But correct me if I’m wrong, they seemed to support the video validity of the Corbell footage, did they not? Based on their video analysis, they figure the object in question is, “a bunch of Mylar balloons.” I don’t buy that explanation given all the background details from multiple sources 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@SloverOfTeuth]

​@@oz1751 Ah yes, all the background details from multiple sources. You heard something from someone other than Corbell? It's like watching someone trying to do fractions when they can't even put two and two together.

[@skdub22]

The camera is mounted inside a clear housing. There's bird poop on the clear housing, that's the "jellyfish". It appears static because it is static; the camera is moving inside the housing but the spot of bird poop is static because its on the outside of the clear housing, which isn't moving.@@oz1751

[@Lt_Aldo_Raine]

​@noneck3099 Corbell has said that he was never given the full video, just accounts to go along with what he was given saying it went into the water afterwards.

[@philmstud2k]

They're just going to ignore that that "bunch of balloons" was invisible and only showed up on the infrared radar?

[@thingonathinginathing]

YES SIR

[@asdfjoe123]

8:40 -- How exactly does one "shut down" radio receivers owned by community members (called "police scanners" by our host.)

[@armcie5080]

Exactly. It's impossible *using human technology*. But we can't deny the evidence of some random guy saying it happened. So it must be aliens.

[@guillermodelnoche]

Sam’s glasses get an instant like!

[@SurlockGnomez]

The location of it on the screen remains the same until the camera moves and then it moves at the same rate. My guess it's a squashed bug on a piece of glass that is protecting the moving camera inside. Also it's brightness only changes when the background brightness is changed but a higher amount, indicating it's closer to the lens.

[@YourOldUncleNoongah]

Ive often said the "Phoenix Lights" were just military paratroopers, jumping after dark with Flares/Lights.

[@H0TD0GSALAD]

It's a bundle of balloons from a sad little boys birthday party that no one showed up to.

[@evantaylor1378]

They...didnt debunk the corbell jellyfish vid. That was a guess lol they also didnt acknowledge that it wasn't seen by anyone

[@scottd9448]

I once saw with many witnesses what looked like a UFO over Iceland. It was a clear summers day & there was a tiny black dot moving incredibly fast across the sky. Similar to watching a satellite at night. Mid 1980's, so probably an SR-71 on a routine circuit over northern USSR.

[@1lapmagic]

A satellite travels orders of magnitude faster than an SR-71. It's funny when people try to explain things to themselves logically by illogical means.

[@jaroslavpesek6642]

​@@1lapmagic like you are doing now?

[@MMmmmmBobbert]

The speed isn’t the only determinant if it is a UAP. Just because they can create videos that look like it, doesn’t mean that the object wasn’t real. Also, the object could change color to camouflage itself.

[@gospelofthomas77thpearl22]

The jellyfish over the army base is clearly not balloons

[@IAmSarlosCantana]

If was the US government and I was trying to hide real alien footage I would legit just make Corridor make a "debunking" video of it lol

[@thingonathinginathing]

Exactly!!

[@Tyraelxadrias]

Why would you even debunk this video… it’s directly from Military officers…

[@Darkreaper1982]

The X-Files would be very short if these 3 were assigned to the case.

[@poldofranzino8876]

No, these guys just doesnt debunk anything at all. They omitt 3/4 of the info and made up the rest. This video is from military and they think to debunk it in 3 seconds saying is just ballons without any trace of reasonment, just randomly saying is a ballon. These guys are just mid tier vfx artist, not military and aircraft experts

[@Vaeldarg]

@@poldofranzino8876 The same military that gets confused looking at fellow jets through an IR camera, as shown in one of their previous videos, because the "aircraft expert" (ie. pilot) wasn't a VFX expert? The same military that loves nothing more than to increase their budget for any reason at all? Can it be the reason you dislike them isn't because they're "mid tier", but because they spoil your UFO-hunting fun?

[@midwestrebel2]

​@@poldofranzino8876 exactly 🤣 these KZbinrs get full of themselves with the more subscribers they get ..

[@midwestrebel2]

​@@Vaeldargyou know the first video is located at a joint operations US base in Iraq 🤣🤦 It's not just US involved smart one . These KZbinrs probably never touch grass 🤣 How TF is it balloons in the middle of the desert

[@Vaeldarg]

@@midwestrebel2 I'm smart enough to recognise how what you wrote says nothing against what I wrote at all. Maybe get up from watching hoax videos and go touch grass yourself?

[@1FiftyOverland]

You debunked all the others, but Definitely did not debunk the firdt one that was released by Jeremy Corbel

[@The_Albino_Jackal]

First we find out there’s a halo ring, now we find out there’s an engineer. What’s next, the flood?

[@potloodgum]

Everytime Sam wears those glasses, i am having a good day that day.

[@wayneclayton5426]

First one is bird crap on the glass of a camera housing. The camera inside is on a separate gimble inside the housing.

[@mickeydangerez]

YES!

[@kuromiLayfe]

the first clip..my main instinct immediately went to dirt on the camera lens or sensor or a tiny bug that managed to get stuck in between … see that too often in the IR camera’s at work where microscopic dust particles got behind the lens and in front of the sensor causing relative static blobs on the output..especially at the 15 average ms shutterspeeds

[@mjeffery]

100% agree. That image has no three dimensionality to it. No matter where the camera looks, it is always the same exact size and shape and it seems to move with the camera rather than the scenery. If it was a real object floating across, shouldn't it get closer or farther or turn as the camera sees it from different angles? Shouldn't it cast a shadow? It does seem like the cross-hairs can shift relative to whatever that bug splat or bird poop is attached to, like a camera in a bubble or something.

[@mccarthy86]

I thought that at first but I analysed it and it is a 3D object in the air, it does turn around.

[@mjeffery]

@@mccarthy86 Analyzed how? If it's turning in the air, what shape is it?

[@1lapmagic]

How can the camera sensor simultaneously be focused on dirt on the lens and a km in the distance? The "dirt" or "bird poop" or whatever would appear as nothing more than a blob. This object moves and rotates during the course of the video, subtly. You can find this information online. You can also prove to yourself that a camera cannot simultaneously focus on two points, if you really have to.

[@1lapmagic]

This is false. There are analyses of the video displaying the object making slight rotation about the X-axis during this video. It is not stationary. No, it should not cast a shadow if it is only visible on infrared. That means visible-spectrum light is not hitting it.@@mjeffery

[@theeddytor3490]

we have reached a point where if a real alien show up at corridor digital office door and said "you said aliens aren't real?" sam would just close the order and say " alright who is buying me lunch today? "

[@dshepherd107]

Im practically choking on the irony of that statement

[@_Hyda_]

You can't talk aliens with non believers

[@yasuchika]

The human mind just can't deal with blurry imagery.

[@apex_prey]

Oh. So. Not debunked after all.

[@gergelyozsvar9890]

The jellyfish in the declassified video changes temperature quickly, and is not visible to the naked eye. This was definitely not balloons.

[@samdoesthings4752]

The first video was probably (edit: definitely, 100%) a smudge on the lens of the camera. The camera tracked it too perfectly. It would also account for the fact that nobody saw it in person and the changes in colour. The shot also first came from a filmmaker and "UFO enthusiast" which makes it a very likely fake.

[@wizzzer1337]

The last footage is the real reason aliens don't visit, we are too cool for them.

[@GrimJackal]

Another effective, clear demonstration that jumping to "Aliens!" will always close your mind to other, significantly simpler explanations. Well done chaps.

[@Henry.25]

6:39 I'm not even mad about this ad, this was top notch 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@LordKrow]

The first UFO /UAP looks like the probe droids / drone from Star wars that was seen during the battles of Hoth😂

[@kegyen]

The only thing any of this proves is when you don’t include certain information you can debunk everything. That makes our situation worse lol

[@EnactingAnEra]

My only issue with the jellyfish debunk odd they didn’t talk/realize that the reason the footage is so compelling is because it’s captured in FLIR. The temperature is constantly changing. Going from black to white and back to black.

[@JasonNortwich]

I love these guys debunking UFO videos!

[@aiurea1]

They didn't debunk the first one.

[@BenExell]

@@aiurea1 They did, its balloons.

[@J_C95]

@@BenExell No they produced a video that convinced the average youtube viewer that they did. Expert analysts with access to the full data, most of which is classified, have ruled that out.

[@BenExell]

@@J_C95 Oh we've got a live one! xD The probability its anything other than aliens is like 0%.

[@J_C95]

@@BenExell All I ask is that you realize how easily fooled you were when this comes out. Congress is pushing for disclosure now.

[@smashrails2175]

The second part of the jellyfish fish ufo is now out. The 3rd part will be released shortly showing it enter the water for 17 seconds and shoot off out of sight. That's quite the balloon.

[@MohsinSevensins]

Balloons? That's your best explanation? Is that what you call "Debunking"?

[@thingonathinginathing]

Yeah they suck.

[@jaroslavpesek6642]

It looks like bunch of baloons, but in this case it is crack in camera cover or some dirt.

[@LunaNK22]

And what's your explanation genius? Wind speed, balloon shape, make sense, what's your ideas then?

[@LunaNK22]

​@@thingonathinginathing can you do better then?

[@thingonathinginathing]

@@LunaNK22 I'm not into disinformation.

[@R.K_Chalkboard]

I’m more happy that last clip was skydivers than UFOs. That is so sick.

[@jro4960]

Bird poo on a lockheed martin blimp windshield? P-791 is a good example.