Victims Of Photography: Interactions Compilation Volume 1

[@PINACI]

Freedom of panorama and Section 62 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which allows us all to take pictures of anything, including private buildings, statues and pretty much everything else from public to publish or sell for profit without infringing anyone's copyright. There may have been an issue with the bloke who had the 2D paintings on display but then he displayed them out in public.

[@ronventy798]

Ah yes the pinaci news character .

[@kennyjones3679]

Filmed hundreds of times a day yet thickos don't mind that. They are becoming extremely dangerous.

[@7king8debs79]

Filmed by CCTV? Yeah that's not the same thing. A random man capturing images of citizens does not have the same level of controls around what he does with the images.

[@Catamaran-wr2gd]

well he placed them on KZbin...and that makes him a data processor, and he has breached the UKGDPR 2018 Act,( the regulations for the Digital Privacy Act 2018) ..@@7king8debs79

[@-Dragonfyr-]

That 20 year old child is going to have a very sheltered life if he doesn't like photos being taken in public 😂

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Parents protecting their kids in this over-the-top way is what breeds entitlement 🙄

[@ronventy798]

Yeah and that's your whimp entitlement .

[@ricochet2977]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr The logic of these people is unbelievable, how many of them gone to London and taken photos of Prince William and his kids from a public place?

[@motman3188]

@@ronventy798 wtf is a whimp you wimp?

[@gj5900]

I enjoyed that montage. Keep taking pictures and keep uploading videos. Most people you interact with don’t have the IQ to understand how ridiculous their questions and made up laws are, let alone understand how logical and reasonable you are.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

All it does is demonstrate how they're used to interacting with people and how brainless they are.

[@kennyjones3679]

A 20 year old kid FFS.

[@losttog]

This video encapsulates the struggles of every ammeter photographer. The NPCs need a firmware update! 🤣🤣🤣

[@johnlowrie1041]

Dear Lord what happened to people, people used to look at a camera and say hi mam , dad, Paranoia all round 😮

[@kennyjones3679]

The guy in the car park let something slip he should be watched carefully.

[@shipface4714]

Never start an argument with ignorant peolple because they will pull you down to their level and they will win because it's their "knowledge" of ignorance....when ignorant people try to proof themself it is quite "funny"...

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

It is funny and that's the only reason I let them continue haha. Though, in this era of the internet and social media, it seems ignorance prevails. One person's knowledge is indefensible over another person's ignorance.

[@ronventy798]

It's not always about the camera some people don't like the person.That's what ended photo fiend career the total prat

[@ashleynaylor9531]

These National Trust volunteers are a different level of ignorance.

[@mortuaryartist]

I thought I was the only one that checked the clouds. I’ve got a customer service department. Love it 👍

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

I use it all the time, you'll be surprised how many people think I'm being serious 🤣

[@ronventy798]

YOU GOTTA BE SERIOUS JASON aka nosaj in Geordie back slang marra NOSAJ for nosey entitled individual.

[@WAC-qh6mk]

People mind your business and stay in your own Lane and deal with your own feelings you can get a cream from your local chemist to help with that pain you are experiencing (new sub)

[@Midge99]

Must say this is so refreshing to see an individual photographer/journalist that's not an auditor,do people not realise they are being filmed over & over wherever they go,in shops,streets,door bells,dash cams etc..photography is NOT a crime..I honestly think thick people are camera magnets..fantastic work,well done.

[@7king8debs79]

The man is an auditor. He uses the exact same script.

[@Catamaran-wr2gd]

He is an Auditor, and he places his work on KZbin obviously...that makes him a data processor....and there are cameras everywhere, but the difference is that a data subjects information is not placed into the public domain, and they have to follow strict regulations on how the data is processed and controlled...photography or videography does not come under UKGDPR 2018 Act and the Digital Privacy Act if it is for household or personal use...

[@jackimbirski1695]

What a great video. Straight to the point without any aggression, stood firm when needed but showered forgiveness of ignorance when it was right. Good lad

[@SergeiFedorov77]

The fake "may I help you/are you alright" makes my blood boil. And they're always sure they know the law better than the guy who's doing it. It's like thinking you'd be a better doctor than the actual doctors just because you don't understand anything about being a doctor.

[@kennyjones3679]

Me too I hate nosey sods it's a trait I loath.

[@kennyjones3679]

People exposing idiots I'm ashamed the lack of knowledge these people know.

[@mozzerianmisanthrope406]

Got a bit of an issue with grammar, huh... Troglodyte.

[@josim]

As we know a thief is so easy to spot because he has a camera, if only life was so easy.

[@MikeEves]

Accusing you of being a thief because you have a camera, and they had two cameras above their heads. They must be thieving from the public...

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

I really hate the connection people make between a man with a camera and a thief.

[@EyeSpyAudit]

You found some right idiots here 😂

[@AD-53]

That guy was a bit obsessed with the child

[@kennyjones3679]

My thoughts too should be watched 247.

[@daytona1212]

Just like in the audit videos, this shows how dumb and uneducated a lot of people are. They make up none existing laws and I have no clue why they think there is a law that says you can't film people in public. Great video.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Cheers! Yes, I find that ignorance and stubbornness go hand in hand. The more ignorant they are, the more stubborn they are in their ignorance.

[@thegoat11111]

You're filming a kid sounds like the new I can smell cannabis in your car excuse.

[@ronventy798]

Nice one ole marra

[@geoffreythomas-cs1sk]

THIS IS HATRED OF PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHY. I CONSIDER THIS TO BE A "HATE CRIME".

[@theblackfox8920]

Grown men walking up to other men, asking them "what they're doing" like its an accusation, disgusting

[@geoffreythomas-cs1sk]

MR. AUDITOR YOU ARE BRILLIANT. YOU MEET THE THICKEST OF PEOPLE WHO LIVE THEIR LIVES BASED UPON THEIR OPINION BEING THE LAW. THEY EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO AGREE WITH THEM AND DO AS THEY SAY. 😊 THEY EVEN QUOTE A NON EXISTANT LAW AND WHEN ASKED THE SOURCE OF THAT "LAW" ARE UNABLE TO DO SO.

[@trigger2225]

Just found your channel mate, very good content and enjoyable watch 👍

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

I'm happy you're happy. Cheers bud 👍

[@TheSadButMadLad]

2:00 There is one law that stops photographs being taken in public. Copyright. But its only for 2d things. Like paintings. And you have to take the photograph of the painting with the intent to sell it as a copy. Having it as incidental and not the only thing in the photograph means you can take the photo. So the artist is partially right to protect his paintings. But he's also stupid since a camera pointed in the general direction is unlikely to be making a copy. Plus he's also stupid to put his paintings on show in such a public place. He's also stupid for not realising the marketing opportunity by letting more people see his paintings. But then artists tend not to think logically. Finally he's stupid for committing the criminal offence of assault since two wrongs do not make a right.

[@ronventy798]

Sad but mad lad your mate power to the proletariat is finally in jail toodlepips

[@ronventy798]

Apparently power to the proletariat is finally in prison poor thing .

[@ronventy798]

Aka Dominic McCollom poor thing.

[@ronventy798]

Yeah sad but mad lad see you on x.

[@ronventy798]

Sad but mad lad the KZbin auditors friend .

[@robertmawby3021]

It’s amazing how many pompous people believe that they know the law, when in reality they know nothing about the law, they are little more than barrack room lawyers! 😂

[@MP-Media]

Just found you .. What you're doing is proper reporting on Photographers experience every day .. Thank you 👍

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Thanks bud ✌️

[@JamesBrown-lc4fw]

That’s why I’d never become a member of the National Trust

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Other than the fact that it's a rip-off?

[@owensmith4651]

Just found your channel, loving it.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Glad you're happy with it =)

[@owensmith4651]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr 👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@Beirdo267]

Hang on, how did you know I was new to your channel 🤔😂 You've just got yourself a sub

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Ahh you know it makes sense. Thanks bud! 😊

[@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr So you like to exploit the same thing as them! What you say does prove this! 03:00 Exactly the same as an auditor!

[@deeryker]

you are as much a wanchor as he is

[@MrGhostTube]

One of my favourite auditors is a photographer. Although many of them are problematic attention seekers I think it's good that they are challenging abusive authoritarians. I like photographing unusual and iconic architecture so I'm used to getting odd looks and asked daft questions.

[@DJ_Sycottic]

Those damn privacy laws.... 😂😂

[@deydododontdedoh.5672]

Also, many people park illegally on pavements, causing much stress for many people, mums with prams, wheelchairs, blind people etc but no one seems arsed about that.. but point a camera and it's instant confrontation!??? 😲

[@paulgreenhalgh649]

New sub, really like your style!

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Thanks for the support bud.

[@AJGeeTV]

Great video, and very informative. I can hardly believe that the outlandish belief of Papua New Guinea cannibals that the camera stole their soul and scared them away is still alive and well in the native population of The British Isles.

[@davidhenry7188]

You handled the situation in a excellent manner, keep up the great work,once people learn photography in public place is lawful activity

[@timgeorge1009]

Sent over by mr inbetween Looking forward to watching your content

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Thanks bud! Appreciate it.

[@TimG2553]

As a photographer I tell people I am documenting the area for historical purposes because since the first camera was created people have taken pictures , as long as I am in a public area I want to be left alone I do tell people if they ask I am documenting the area for future generations

[@MadeinSheffield]

I am getting into photography as a new hobby. Because of auditors and the issues they encounter I will be wearing a action cam on my chest as a "body cam" for my protection and evidence both to protect me and against anyone who might what to do harm to me. I am expecting encounters like this but my photo's will be for art use only and depending on the results might be uploaded and available to people to use if they request it. Lets see what occurs in the next year. Keep up the good work.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Be sure to drop your chanel name into a comment on this thread then, I assume you won't be mixing that content up with your existing chanel? Good luck bud. I wear a body cam now, only because the auditors have created a situation whereby everyone out there assumes that because I'm taking photos, I must be a KZbin auditor and so a confrontation happens when it otherwise probably wouldn't have

[@sc0ttw22]

Photography of children in public isn't even illegal. Why do parents think that?

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Some people believe everything they hear and some believe everything they think

[@ramadamming8498]

​@@TheDisruptiveKZbinrwhat is the point here in your winding people up or effictivley gaslighting them? As well as just being an arrogant and confrontational awkward twit?

[@Error_404_Not_Found_timed_out_]

@@ramadamming8498 . . .it's called PINAC - photography is not a crime. 'Reggie Photos' has the same problem when he writes things in a notebook in public, so has resorted to writing with an erasable marker pen on a small perspex sheet - fully transparent. The police then stop him for writing in a secret language (a secret code, as some have said)- not realising it is in reverse when they view it - that's how stupid the 'authorities' are. . . and how paranoid people have become.

[@andrewlitow]

Dudes tight ass pants are restricting blood flow to the brain.

[@powertothepeople5706]

Taking turns for the jab..😁👍😉

[@justalitttleun]

Yeh and all old people, they know not what they do!

[@readitoutloud]

When will the government provide all these victims of public photography with compensation and psychological assistance ?😢😢

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

My chanel is all about raising awareness for victims of photography ✌️😉

[@truthtorpedo99]

Your interactions are 1st rate

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Glad you think so 😆

[@anniearkins7000]

@ 9.24 he's asking you what you're doing, then proceeds to drive off, no hands on wheel, mobile phone in hand, didn't check anything around him before driving off, yet you are the one being checked by him!!

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

I submitted the footage to the police. Haven't even got a response and they wonder why we have no respect for them

[@garybrindle6715]

People who are bored and have time to spare will try to pick an arguement. Best policy is to ignore them, completely.And be quick about taking pics ( unless you are trying for a confrontation). Transport shots are best taken without distracting background with medium zooms eg trucks, cars, trains, aircraft.

[@markbrown1089]

He's pointing out kids that you didn't see so who's looking at kids here?

[@benimarusasaka9127]

projecting himself onto him

[@Lanterns_light]

Really enjoyed that ‘I’m awkward’ narrative

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

😉

[@markbrown1089]

My God, someone working at Londis (not even security) asking a man on a public pavement for I.D😩

[@christophertownley7512]

So you have just proved it happens to auditers even if thay was or wasn't after a reaction... You get it anywsy

[@EyeSpyAudit]

Walking through an open gate into private property that is then locked it would be yourself committing being inside an enclosed premises 😂 funny as that may sound

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Not sure about that. If you're referring to "being found on enclosed premises" then I've looked i to that. The only way you can be found guilty of that is if the police were looking for you and they FOUND you on enclosed premises. You have to be hiding from them while they're actively searing for you. The police try to use this one when they've got no other reason to detain you when all you're doing is trespassing. It doesn't work like that

[@nonenone-vt8cg]

What is this nonsense about taking pictures of kids, schools do it at least once a year every year and they keep quiete about what they do with the images.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Some people try to make out that because you're taking a photo of a kid, it means you're a peado. It's sick.

[@ronventy798]

Looking like Owen Jones anything is possible .

[@robertmawby3021]

Poor Arun, direct from the Hindu Kush, demanding ID from the British public and quoting British law!

[@kennyjones3679]

God this day and age frighted of a camera all this paranoia all since covid.

[@deydododontdedoh.5672]

I like amature photography and I'm really amature but often I feel when taking pictures like I have to be almost covert in case someone thinks I'm casing a place or invasion of privacy or being a general creep for pursuing a hobby. I don't even go around trying to get people or kids as that would cause hell, no matter what your intentions.. A man with a camera = instant pervert or crim. I do whatch audting (DJ and ACE are the best btw) I have learnt more now about bo right to privacy in public unless you create your own privacy face covering etc but it's amazing how many people believe it's illegal to photograph in public and how hostile people can be towards someone with just a camera just taking photos. 😮

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

My camera and I seem to bring out the worst in people. I've taken loads of photos of my kids playing in the playground and even at school, with other kids around and no one has every shown any objection. I walk through a quiet industrial site, wasteland or abandoned factory and suddenly everyone has an issue with my camera.

[@lint8391]

It is ridiculous that anyone makes a fuss about taking photos of children. In public. When the children are fully clothed. It's the triumph of ignorance and emotions over logic. Active paedo's should be caught and locked up. Public photographers - in this context - are entirely harmless and do not deserve to be picked on in the way that they are.

[@jasonpickering8570]

It's a yes from me, and a sub ❤

[@Paul-ry5cx]

at the 3:50 mark the regulation the gentleman was referring to was UKGDPR 2018 Act and the Digital Privacy Act 2018, and the reason he asked you if it was for personal use is because Processing of personal data for purely personal or household purposes generally falls outside the scope of the UK GDPR and DPA..by 'publishing' means that you as a 'natural person' are classed as a data processor and must follow the regulations covered in both Acts...

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

GDPR doesn't apply to me bud, I'm an individual. DPA and GDPR is there to protect the individuals from the cooperations, institutions and governments. They don't need protecting from us.

[@Paul-ry5cx]

lmao...maybe if you bothered to read the regulations themselves you would understand thats complete bullshido...i used the wording from the law when i described what a data processor is, maybe use google to understand what a 'natural person' is.@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr

[@ronventy798]

Spot on Paul this geezer is a mister know it all for cheap KZbin views.

[@ronventy798]

Jason so one law for you and another for everyone else. That's self entitlement by a bloody mile.

[@Paul-ry5cx]

The Law in force here is the Digital PRIVACY Act....(the hint is in the name) and the regulations are the UKGDPA 2018 Act.. @TheDisruptiveKZbinr The UK GDPR defines a processor as: ‘processor’ means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or other body which processes personal data on behalf of the controller. The legal definition of a natural person: A natural person (also sometimes referred to as a physical person) is a title used to identify an individual human being. This is different from a legal person, which can be an individual or a company.. obligations of a Data Processor : rights of a Data Subject Right to be Informed You must provide individuals with information including: your purposes for processing their personal data, your retention periods for that personal data, and who it will be shared with. We call this ‘privacy information’. You must provide privacy information to individuals at the time you collect their personal data from them. The information you provide to people must be concise, transparent, intelligible, easily accessible, and it must use clear and plain language. you must provide information for any data controller you intend to share the data with...(in this case KZbin and your channel name. )

[@chrisfs150]

Im all out of shits to give. 😊😅😮😢🎉🎉🎉🎉😂❤ Rofl

[@Fredders88]

Sudden career change for Steve Cram.

[@ronventy798]

Nah he's a more Owen Jones lookalike ole mucker.

[@Mr.1.i]

You change your mind everyday

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Chanel my mind about what?

[@Mr.1.i]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr about arguments you have with yourself

[@ronventy798]

You should check what finally happened to that photo fiend character with a lot bigger channel than yours.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

What happened to him? I noticed all his content disappeared

[@ronventy798]

One of my friends kicked his arse big time for acting a prat Six weeks hospitalized no witnesses poor thing. He's apologized for being a whimp

[@deydododontdedoh.5672]

'Can I help you' eer no, 'can I ask what you are doing?'... err open heart surgery 🤔😂 You should stop him as he's driving his car home and ask him 'can I ask what you are doing' and he will say obviously driving, so what type of answer are they expecting from someone with a camera?!! 😂

[@Smockotron]

There is an interesting question here around GDPR and publishing peoples (random members of the public) private data (ie their face) without consent. Some of this (where security/employees approaches and especially Police officials) could arguably and easily be considered public interest. But where you have private individuals personal data without consent you *could* run into issues with GDPR when you publish that data, especially if they are recognisable from that data. Where youtube videos sit regarding this is not entirely clear though. (CCTV feeds don't typically publish any data they capture, and usually blur any bystander individuals if it is)

[@craiggorham3522]

GDPR rules only apply to organisations and not to individuals.A private citizen is exempt.

[@Smockotron]

@@craiggorham3522 That's certainly true if they only collect personal information as a “purely personal or household activity.” When they publish it to youtube though, I would not like to speculate if that crosses out of that territory

[@francishughes2016]

Jeez, = 9.28, That guy is the perfect example of "There is no cure for stupid", he is going to look like a real bobblehead, when this goes viral, he has'nt even got an argument, what is he going to say to his kids when they see very clearly that he does'nt know the law regarding public photography, the man is a fool of the highest order ! ! !.

[@captainhowdy9845]

Outside of GDPR, there's no statute on the books in England and Wales that covers 'privacy'. Anyone who cracks on about 'privacy laws' is immediately talking nonsense because no such law exists.

[@babettesfeast6347]

Everyone has a cameraphone in there hands and yet have a meltdown if a guy is taking photos in public. I try to avoid arguments and walk away. Most people are fine

[@rm-gi2mj]

find it a little odd this, I'm a pro photographer & have hundreds of hours of street photography under my belt across the UK. Europe & USA. I could count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've been in a 'confrontation' approaching anything like the ones you seem to 'find' yourself in fairly regularly. Yes you are within your rights but I've found that exercising courtesy and educating in a friendly, professional & above all respectful manner is far more productive in the long run. Good luck to you.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

I mean, I can't imagine how you DONT get approached/accosted like I do. I'm pushing 40 now and I've been taking photos since I was about 8 and for as long as I remember, I've been challenged this way by police and public. They co.e out the blue, when I'm least expecting it. I just don't understand any other photog who claims this never happens to them, unless they're simply taking photos on holiday (surrounded by tourists all taking the same photo of the same thing) or taking landscape photos at the beach or in the mountains.

[@0191Marko]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinrto be fair, I’ve done photography on the streets of Newcastle for about 15 years and only have had one encounter, and then it was just someone asking what was I photographing, it could be because of my appearance 😳 ( 6ft bald guy ), I most certainly have had the “ looks “ before but I’ve learned to ignore them, but I do get your point, there are a hell of a lot of people out there who think they know the law but actually haven’t got a clue, and why are people so freaked out about a camera anyway ? I bet if it was a famous face behind the camera they’d go weak at the knees and practically beg to get their picture taken.

[@Rekaert]

I'm split on the whole auditing thing. On one hand, yes they're out there to see if there is an adverse reaction. But at the same time there shouldn't be an adverse reaction if they're engaged in legal activity. The public generally and even the police seem to be woefully misinformed when it comes to expectation of privacy in public, though some police are catching up with it. I doubt all of them have perfectly noble intentions, but at the same time if just walking down the street started to provoke cops and the public to harass the person walking, I'd want mass marches organised until such behaviour was normalised.

[@ronniebrown6225]

There is no law preventing people from taking photographs in public. If you are taking photographs from private land, you need to have the land owner's permission.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Wrong again. Where ever you are when you're taking photos, chances are you're on private property. All land belongs to someone. Land can be private property but also a public space. In either case, if the land owner doesn't want you to take photos and you do, all they can do about it is to ask you to leave.

[@kennyjones3679]

No you don't.

[@markhamilton9834]

Abdullah and his cousin from the Petrol Pumps,were on another Audit video some time back,,very dodgy that time also,,,a smell about them,and not Curry.🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿👍🤣

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

You may be thinking of my video from about a year ago. It's a clip taken fron that video ;)

[@JohnDoe-lx3dt]

You say auditors exploit but they’re the very people fighting for the rights of urban photography, or is it just that you think only your activity should be protected?

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

They're doing more harm than good, people see them as pests amd when they see an ordinary photog with a camera, they assume "auditor" and so treat them like a pest.

[@JohnDoe-lx3dt]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr well clearly to a lot in your videos you are just a pest, the point is your hobby is lawful as is auditing. So what does it matter what they think your reason is because either way these Karen’s will have to come tell you off anyone. Be nicer if everyone just left everyone else alone.

[@MoontownMoss]

You're not bringing down the oppressive arm of the state by annoying folk just trying to make a wage.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

They annoy me. Its the other way round. They went out of their way to confront me. I'm trying to stay away from them, haven't you noticed that?

[@MoontownMoss]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr Honestly no. That's not what I observed at all.

[@alexfilma16]

@@MoontownMossYes it is.

[@MoontownMoss]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr Ok fair enough, I missed the part at the start of the video where you distance yourself from those annoying youtube auditors who film confrontation content. I wasn't paying attention and just caught the compilation of you continuing to film people who stated they were uncomfortable with you filming them or felt it was inappropriate for you to be filming - which of course you have every right to do. I do apologise. Heres your latest 8 video titles: Victims Of Photography: Interactions Compilation Volume 1 Triggered and confused security guard vs. man with a camera | Team Valley This was unexpected - A pleasant encounter | Ecocabs - Hexham 3 more victims of photography - Intimidation fail | TPS Rental Systems Audit Council worker wants to show my photo to the police | Photography Audit They called the police because Karen made a complaint | Shell Photography Audit Road raged by another Karen | Triggered horse rider Road raged by a Karen

[@kennyjones3679]

Then these idiots take photos on a beach in ibiza without bathers permission.

[@averyintelligence]

PINAC

[@ramadamming8498]

PINAC is often an acronymn for "OCD moronist futility zero reasoning plus plenty of irrationality and spoilt child dramamaker syndrome". Not always though.

[@averyintelligence]

sometimes its monday. not always tho@@ramadamming8498

[@ronniebrown6225]

Can someone take photos of my child without permission? For young people under 16, you should also get parental consent before taking a photo or video. In situations where under 16s are separated from their parents (for example if they are in care) you should seek consent from someone who holds parental responsibility (for example the child's carer or the local authority).11 Jan 2024

[@MadeinSheffield]

It all depends on the context of the video/photo. If they are incidental then no otherwise Match of the Day or the news would need a lot of forms filled out every week.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

You're wrong and it's people like you who are the problem. No consent is required. When they're out in public, what's the issue?

[@Error_404_Not_Found_timed_out_]

If your that concerned - keep your children indoors and away from dash cams, Council buildings, private property and public events. Always chaperone them - surely it is irresponsible to let them out of the house on their own. . . oh and don't forget to cover your women folk with a headscarf or niqab in case people see them in public.

[@jannenreuben7398]

Legally there's nothing preventing someone taking pictures of children unless those pictures are indecent. Asking permission is a courtesy rather than a legal requirement.

[@danielzimmerman2666]

Freedom from lies 😂I can't hear your Communism 😂😂😂

[@JohnMcCracken-o9t]

Yeah i know ur type "if she's a minor so what" FFS and she looks about 20 im sure a judge has heard this defence before

[@mikebaker4190]

His type? A man with a camera?

[@JohnMcCracken-o9t]

Camera is obviously his prop listen to his comments

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

​@user-mp7fz2zp3p really struggling to understand what your point is here.

[@ronventy798]

It's blatantly obvious entitled one because you have a kid yourself .

[@JohnMcCracken-o9t]

You must be thick if you can't understand 🤔

[@danielzimmerman2666]

🎉😂I can't hear your Communism 😢😢😢 Droid think My Freedom is paramount 😊

[@ATLAS943]

Enters private property without permission (trespassing) and believes he has the right to be there plus there is an expectation of privacy on private land and they have told him not to film on private property. To film on private property permission needs to be obtained.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

What if you're wrong? Its only trespass once asked to leave and you don't. There's no automatic right to be on someone else's property (outside of open access land subject to the Rights Of Way Act 2000) but we're living in a freedom based country, meaning that we have the freedom to go anywhere that isn't specifically restricted. We don't need there to be a right, its already an ungoverned freedom. All land belongs to someone and so whereever you are when you're taking photos, you're on someone else's land. No one can stop you from doing what you're doing (taking photos or otherwise). If the land owner doesn't like what you're doing on their land, all they can do is ask you to leave. If their land has an easement, a public right of way or is open access, they can't even ask you to leave.

[@green856w]

If photography takes place on private land the photographer will need the landowner's permission. Why anyone would want to antagonise or cause aggravation in other peoples' lives seems is beyond me. Under data protection legislation, being on private property and photographing people there is unlawful. His use of the term 'public access request' seems to denotes that he is aware of data protection law. He should be aware that there are conditions as to what activities are permissible on National Trust land/premises. The purpose of the person taking this video seems to be nothing short of provocative (for no apparent reason - other than he needs attention). His encounter regarding the young female is weird . What right has he to tell the male asking what h'es doing to 'go back inside' is nothing short of asking for to be arrested for conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Are you having a laugh? Photography on private land is illegal? What right do I have to tell him to go back inside? What right does he have to make me stop taking photos in a public place? You really think my co lnduct there could get me arrested? Wow! You've displayed some bloody poor ignorance there bud. As for being provocative, did you not listen to the message at the beginning of the video?

[@kennyjones3679]

Another thick one that knows no laws. A dangerous idiot at its best.

[@Midge99]

Nowt as Queer as folk,these delinquents that say your doing wrong probably do it in isolation and wouldn't say boo to a ghost...taking photos 😅😅😅😅😅

[@nobover]

Forget laws, have you ever thought that your just rude?

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Ruder than the people who theink they can demand that I stop doing something perfectly legal?

[@nobover]

@TheDisruptiveKZbinr yes you are. These people are just getting on with there day, you're obviously annoying because it keeps happening to you. I only watched half the video and I found you to be an annoying prick. Some people don't want a camera in there face while they are getting on with there day, Especially older people. There are lots of photographer's who do there job without getting into altercations. It's quite obviously you that's the problem and to say you don't go looking for it is lie. You're looking for content and then playing the victim card. Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean its not annoying or rude.

[@retroclickmedia4422]

@@nobover Just about every photographer has been in an altercation caused by people not understanding the law

[@MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy]

@@retroclickmedia4422I’ve had problems, but I’ve had no where the number of problems as this person and I am very able to deal with any problems people have with me.

[@lint8391]

@@nobover Your comments to this video are annoying and rude and overly negative. Crack on. Be as annoying, rude and negative as you like. It's a free country in those respects (or it's supposed to be).

[@PaulWright-vo5xl]

Swearing in public, shouting after people and calling people names and not engaging in a cordial conversation means you're acting like many of the so-called 'auditors'. I've been an amateur photographer for well over 50 years and have never encountered any problems and that's because I'm respectful and sensitive to others and when I have been challenged or I've been asked questions I've dealt with that in an adult and non-confrontational way and then carried on with what I was doing.

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Yes, but are you taking photos of things that people normally take photos of in a place they normally do it? Like on holiday? Maybe you're a landscape photographer or a wedding photographer? Maybe you're part of the problem? You enable them. You allow people to walk all over you and so they beleive they can do it to everyone. They approach you and you bend over for them and so there's no drama. They approach me and I like to stay private, I tell them to mind their own business and so there's confrontation.

[@averyintelligence]

SO? we dont need permission or to be challenged in the first place.

[@williamtopping]

And yet here you are, behaving in a disrepectful manner, challenging others on the Internet, whilst professing you're holier than thou. I guess you're doing this because you're behind a keyboard. But perhaps you're not as holy as you delude yourself to be. Your arrogance blinds you to the fact that here YOU are being confrontational whilst vilifying someone else for the VERY THING you yourself are doing. What a clown

[@PaulWright-vo5xl]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinr I take photographs of anything I find interesting and that includes the urban environment including factories, commercial premises and shops. I've already explained how I deal with any challenges and it works for me. I don't enable anyone, I don't allow anyone to walk all over me and yet there's no drama. That's down to my response and not going round with a chip on my shoulder and feeling upset because someone has questioned me or challenged me. You are like so-called auditors' because you seem to want to get your content and contribute to a confrontation. And as for the swearing and name-calling, you just need to keep control of your emotions.

[@PaulWright-vo5xl]

@@averyintelligence I agree but if it does happen then there are ways to deal with it but I recognise when the photographer has an agenda - getting content for their KZbin channel so they can get money - then things are likely to become unnecessarily confrontational.

[@bensmith5231]

So he's a artist and gets funny that somebody is taking an interest in his art.... 😂 . BUT im sorry to say GET OFF of private land fella !! 👍

[@DarrenWild-p4p]

Stop talking

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

No thanks

[@Paulds1gs]

Taking pictures of little girls in public, then saying you’ll carry on doing it is a massive red flag. Just stop that lad

[@Philzoid]

I think you're projecting your own twisted thoughts.

[@Paulds1gs]

@@Philzoid if you think that’s normal to photograph women and kids then I’d encourage people to avoid you

[@Philzoid]

@@Paulds1gs Again, you're projecting your own twisted thoughts. Normal people don't see anything perverted or sexual about street photography.

[@Paulds1gs]

@@Philzoid some guy being told he’s filming a minor and he says he doesn’t care, he can do it! No wonder there are so many nonces knocking about when people like you are ok with them and tell anyone concerned about it that they shouldn’t speak up. ‘Public photography’ is usually of a scenic nature…..not other peoples kids when the parents also show worry.

[@ronventy798]

Your the twisted one ole mucker.

[@deeryker]

reported,,,soon you wont be able to upload,,your URL will be blocked

[@MoontownMoss]

Damn right

[@zantas-handle]

What for?

[@Error_404_Not_Found_timed_out_]

I've just done the same to your channel - it's pretty crap

[@wr2956]

You been reported for cyber bullying 👍

[@deeryker]

I have reporter this vid and operator

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

Why? 🤷‍♂️

[@Bob10009]

🤦🏻‍♂️

[@wr2956]

@@TheDisruptiveKZbinrI just reported deeryker for cyber bullying

[@TheDisruptiveYouTuber]

@@wr2956 ahh dude, he's a cherished hater! He has actually subscribed haha. He comments on my videos way more than anyone else 🤣🤣🤣

[@ronventy798]

Since you have a kid yourself Jason you should be especially careful

[@mcfcguvnors]

we have a massive dumb bridge being built here like 100 odd million quid ,massive barges from holland etc etc . I saw one part the other week so took some pics . This lady asked me what im doing nothing i replied - then get away from my house .No ,im nowhere near your house ,you are taking pictures of my house . At that point i have a pre prepared joke - a piece of paper with Googles US number & JPL NASA = BOTH took pics of your house & didnt ask = moan at them .