While watching your video I finally had the moment where things "clicked" and made sense - thank you! Your examples where you walk us through step by step really made a huge difference in clarifying the concepts!
@johnwinters15182 жыл бұрын
Why can’t the prosecutor offer evidence of the witnesses’ untruthful character? Isn’t that the purpose of impeachment by offering reputation or opinion testimony?
@sduran04147 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This really cleared up Impeachment of witnesses for me. Bar prep had me very confused!
@michaelroman39578 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@ZGamesYouTube5 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@charles4896 жыл бұрын
Under 608, good character of truthfulness can only be brought after being attacked. The video at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="304">5:04</a> shows A testifies on direct to the D's good character for truthfulness. Is this allowed?
@montecraz21725 жыл бұрын
Under Rule 404 (a) (2) (A), the defendant, in a criminal case, may introduce character evidence of the defendants own pertinent character trait. I am assuming that this is the reason that the evidence is being admitted, because you are correct that 608 (a) only allows evidence of a witness's character for truthfulness to be brought in only after their credibility for truthfulness has been attacked. If I am incorrect please correct me... preferably before 10 PM tomorrow night, because I have an evidence final coming up, lol.
@charles4895 жыл бұрын
@@montecraz2172 You are absolutely correct! I figured this out couple weeks before my Evidence final, which I just took two days ago. If the prosecution charges D with fraud. 404a2A come in. Thank you.