A lifetime of enjoying recorded music has gifted my ears with a legion of wonderful pianists. Incredible artists from past and present. But if I must choose only one, it's Rachmaninoff. His unique blend of power and subtlety is like no other.
@pianomaly95 ай бұрын
Yes - SVR's playing is a unique amalgam of freedom and discipline not really equaled, IMO.
@sappallow2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this fascinating post. The performances are amazing. I still marvel how Cortot, despite a limited technique could produce some of the most expressive & profound recordings of Schumann & Chopin ever made. His rubato is subtle, organic, & truly musical. Likewise, Schnabel with his huge technical limitations produced Beethoven recordings that still leave us in awe for their direct purity of conception.
@magbag702 жыл бұрын
Cortot had not a limited technique in my view... this is a misconception derived from the fact most recordings are from his later years. There are some early recordings which display a great technique. And yes, he was one of the greatest .. his Chopin , Schumann ... yes .. and also his Franck and Debussy... among the best
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I wish I hadn't missed it :(
@davidcotuit2 жыл бұрын
Indeed! Remember what Rubinstein said....he could play an entire recital consisting only of all the wrong notes he had played during his career.
@donaldallen1771 Жыл бұрын
@@magbag70 I agree with you completely. Anyone who makes the statement that Cortot did not have a virtuoso technique hasn't heard the early recordings, most importantly the Chopin Etudes. Even the recording of the Chopin b-minor Sonata, where some of the wrong-note tendency appears, is stupendous playing, technically and musically. For me, it's the greatest performance of that masterpiece, with his student, Dinu Lipatti, not far behind.
@guigui93448 ай бұрын
Cortot, limite technique ? 🤣🤣 Most people don't even understand what technique is. Playing the compositions he was playing and intetpreting them with that expressiveness(without entrering in all details) requires huuuge technique.
@christophersurnname99672 жыл бұрын
Great video! Currently on a Horowitz binge so this is perfect timing.
@arpeggiomikey2 жыл бұрын
I'm on a LIFETIME Volodya binge! 😁👍
@johnrock21732 жыл бұрын
Fantastic collection as always. That Gieseking Debussy is amazing. I remember reading Evenings With Horowitz way back and actually just saw it at a bookstore. Thank you for your talent in compiling these.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, thanks for your comment!
@berlinzerberus2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful! Horowitz was not only interested in his own playing but also in statements about prominent colleaques, according to what he said in this fabulous compilation. He didn't grudge them their success and appreciated what he liked.
@bvbwv32 жыл бұрын
An indescribable treasure of a posting. Thank you. Thank you, Ozan Fabien Guvener.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, It’s my pleasure.
@BryanHalo1232 жыл бұрын
This is a special collection. Thank you for putting it together.
@dariodangelo89382 жыл бұрын
Agree with Horowitz: Fiorentino was one of my Teachers (the most important, by the way). He impressed me too, very much 😂👍🤩
@dipierro42 жыл бұрын
I never had heard of Florentino. THANK YOU for introducing me to his playing.
@Dancingjulien2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/rouvqKB-jtd_l5Y
@sukangeong2 жыл бұрын
Michelangeli always referred to Fiorentino as "the other pianist."
@stefanufer6082 жыл бұрын
Very interesting - the Schumann played by Cortot is wonderful - glorious singing tone. There weren’t many pianists Horowitz openly admired!
@Whaticansayaboutit3 ай бұрын
He never liked Rubinstein. Too much rivalry I suspect.
@Fritz_Maisenbacher2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful testimonies. There is lot comments possible on Horowitz's comments ........ Thank you very much.
@martinmysteres13842 жыл бұрын
I hear so much Cortot when I listen to Horowitz. If I don't mistake, Horowitz did study for a while with Cortot when he came to Paris. I think they both have the same bel canto tone. This ability to make the piano sing. Horowitz preciseness, dynamics, his ability to produce a big sound, his use of pedals, overall showmanship and so on, are even greater but it's just my opinion. I go back to the video and listen to the other pianists. Thank you very much for the upload.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, it's my pleasure. Horowitz wanted to take lessons from Cortot (especially after hearing Cortot's 1919 Saint-Seans Etude Recording), but Cortot refused. Maybe he thought it wasn't necessary, maybe he wanted to keep some things to himself :). Cortot was probably his biggest role model after Rachmaninoff. I agree, Bel Canto plays are very similar in my opinion. Possibly Horowitz's role models in Bel Canto were Cortot and Friedman. And of course Caruso and Mattia Battistini :). Horowitz is better than Cortot in some aspects, of course. For example, Horowitz has almost no rival when it comes to playing the piano like an orchestra and in terms of dynamic richness, yes Horowitz is superior. Or, Cortot's tone and style are not for every composer. But Horowitz's touch and character are appropriate, from Scarlatti and Mozart to Prokofiev and Barber. But on the other hand, I like the timbre that Cortot achieves on the piano more than Horowitz. Cortot's tone and timbre are very beautiful. I think they use the pedal differently, they are both masters at it, but different ways. Cortot appeals to me a little more about the depth of interpretation and creativity. But if we reduce it to just piano technique (Technique is very extensive here), Horowitz is a better "pianist". But even though the two of them are close as "musicians", Cortot appeals to me a little more. This is also a purely relative point though :) How can I say here, I can't say one is better than the other. For example, I prefer Cortot in Chopin Ballads. But in Liszt Hungarian Rhapsodies, Horowitz would be my preference. I think the recordings of the Liszt piano sonata or the Mendelssohn Variations sérieuses are of equivalent quality. I think Schumann and Debussy are very close, but there is little difference, I would say Cortot. Composers such as Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms have an obvious Horowitz superiority. Horowitz is more versatile as I said. His repertoire is broader. Horowitz's style can fit anything: Modern composers, romantics, classics and baroques... Few pianists can come close to this.
@martinmysteres13842 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener It's very interesting, thank you. A big difference also would be that Cortot's abilities deteriorated with time whereas Horowitz gained maturity and richness as he grew older... I have in mind Horowitz's concerts and recordings between 1985 till the end which are pure mastery. Especially his Scarlatti, Mozart (becoming his number one) and Clementi. Personally, I don't like Prokofiev's percussive music, nor I like Barber's oddities. In terms of modern music I would prefer Scriabine... I get your point comparing the two of them. I agree, Cortot's Chopin Ballads are exquisite. If I may suggest and idea : I think that Cortot being French, he had a very charming way of expressing romantic music created in western Europe. On the other hand, Horowitz being mostly Russian, not only did he master romantic music but he had a natural closeness to slavic composers such as Liszt or Rachmaninoff. I agree, Horowitz is more versatile. Even the few Bach he played are extraordinary ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/aIHdeJljlN9-q68 ). Talking about Mendelssohn Variations Sérieuses, I heard a very special interpretation that left me breathless. Zimerman playing it live with an outstanding finale ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/qoazmayZmslohLc ). If you please, let me know your impressions. Thank you again for this pleasant discussion. :) (I'm French so I tried my best to express myself in English) See you
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@martinmysteres1384 I don't listen to Barber and Prokofiev much, I mean there, Horowitz can even play them very well. I meant he could play almost anything on the piano. Of course, Horowitz is great with names like Scriabine. One of his specialties. Yes, you are right about the age factor. Horowitz's latest recording is one of my favourites. I don't always like Zimmerman, but he plays really well here. The finale is really good! And thank you too for this pleasant discussion :).
@martinmysteres13842 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener I don't always like Zimerman too. Since Horowitz only recorded the third Rachmaninoff Concerto (wich I don't forgive), I turn to Zimerman for the first one (with Seiji Ozawa as conductor) and Rachmaninoff himself for the second and the fourth. Horowitz's last recording is such a last will and testament ! The last sparkle containing all his magic and achievement... especially Chopin Etude Op. 25 N. 1 and 5 and the Fantaisie-Impromptu. My favorite recording is not a studio session but is the second sonata of Rachmaninoff he played in London in 1982. This moment is always almost a mystical experience. Yet, he was not at his best during this period and the whole concert is unequal... but this second sonata is something special.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@martinmysteres1384 Glad to hear what you said about Horowitz's London concert recording. I totally agree and I love that recording very much!
@ler_472 жыл бұрын
You know you got it good when you understand Scriabin's music💯
@lucasramos2532 жыл бұрын
That was the best op 55 no 2 i had ever heard. Ignaz Friedman was a really good pianist
@albertomartin48122 жыл бұрын
That recording is in the top 3 of my favourites of all time. It was pure magic.
@ganjamozart14352 жыл бұрын
Cortot's is on par. Absolutely magical as well.
@robertocornacchionialegre2 жыл бұрын
He is the best ever! My favorite pianist at the moment are Frederic Lamond and Ignaz Friedman. Two different styles of playing, both amazing and I don’t know any modern pianist that can match them.
@davidcotuit2 жыл бұрын
Really good? GREAT!
@TheLifeisgood72 Жыл бұрын
Part of the reason why it's so good is the historical pitch used - 436hz, closer to Chopin's (most likely) 434hz.
@AndStar1002 жыл бұрын
I also read Horowitz was a big fan of Emil Gilels. There’s a postcard from VH to Gilels where he writes to ‘a dear friend and colleague’.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
He was respected as a pianist but not a fan, Giels didn't suit his taste:, Horowitz said: "Of the Russian pianists I like only one, Richter. Gilels did some things well, but I did not like his mannerisms, the way he moved around while he was playing."
@AndStar1002 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener thanks for the info, I didn’t know that!
@AndStar1002 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener which, on second thought, is somewhat funny given Richter was not a fan of Horowitz at all
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@AndStar100 Yes haha! Richter actually says that Horowitz has great talent as a pianist, but he doesn't like his musician side, or rather his interpretations. I also read somewhere that Richter really liked Horowitz's last set of recordings, which he did a few days before he died, but I can't find where I read that later. Maybe I'm misremembering, but I read something like this somewhere years ago, although I can't find it again!
@sergio63572 жыл бұрын
50:55 Fiorentino is my favorite!!! I love all his music..
@barney68882 жыл бұрын
I found this priceless! Fascinating.
@NOSEhow2LIV2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video, thank you! I'm surprose nevertheless by the absence of Rudolf Firkusny who VH refers to very specifically and enthusiastically (for his Schubert Drei Klavierstücke)in his postwar New York period. They were linked not only by admiration and friendship but also thru Samuel Barber, both early interpreters of his Sonata and Excursions. I'm plose to learn that VH appreciote Fiorentino.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, he did not mention Rudolf Firkusny in the books, but of course you are right, it was mentioned in other interviews, but I missed it.
@joe_fizz2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video, thank you for sharing
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Mi Consolación. Favorita. 🌹🤗
@msotil2 жыл бұрын
Sergio Fiorentino: He is the only other pianist, said the legendary Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli of Sergio Fiorentino (1927-1998). Fiorentino dedicated himself mostly to teaching and not to concertizing. His career was cut prematurely short in 1954 by an air crash.
@davidwhite29492 жыл бұрын
Wonderful, and I agree, Rachmaninoff is amazing. It happens, but not often, that a composer can perform so well
@muthafutha2 жыл бұрын
Liszt would be on your short Liszt . .. . .
@davidcotuit2 жыл бұрын
Indeed! Beethoven and Liszt weren't too shabby at the keyboard. LOL
@DihelsonMendonca9 ай бұрын
Really ? What happens is that it's rare for a performer get to perform a composer how should it be. Chopin, Liszt, Debussy, Scriabin and many others who say ... 😅😅😅
@lunchmind2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this wonderful and revealing compilation. compilation. Yet I sense that Horowitz damns von Sauer with faint praise. He was more than a mere salon pianist.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
I agree, for some reason there is such a perception, Arrau says the same thing. It is clear that Sauer is not a typical salon pianist.
@johnschlesinger20092 жыл бұрын
So much amazing playing here. Lhevinne's 25/6 is incredible.
@anonymusum2 жыл бұрын
They all are great, great pianists, but when I heard Busoni playing a simple scale in C-major I must confess that I never heard such an unbelievable evenness. It was just a simple scale but it told me that this man was very, very special. No wonder that great pianists like Clara Haskil were eager to take lessons from him. - And by the way: I would have added Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli.
@leestamm31872 жыл бұрын
Busoni was a great pianist to be sure. Also a splendid composer, conductor and teacher.
@marksmith3947 Жыл бұрын
I believe it was Dohnanyi who said that hearing Bartok play a C major scale was a revelation because it wasn't even
@Jannick6362 жыл бұрын
i would have expected to see a nod to Art Tatum in the list. Although not being a classical pianist, he was still greatly respected by, among others Rubinstein and Horowitz. Nevertheless, I really enjoyed the video. Thank you
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Actually, there was, but I couldn't put it because it was copyrighted (the video was blocked) and Horowitz didn't say anything directly to Tatum (but we know he liked him).
@Ace-dv5ce2 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener I believe he said something. Like art Tatum would do great in classical music aswell if he dedicated his life to it
@vova472 жыл бұрын
@@Ace-dv5ce Please state your source for this "quote".
@Ace-dv5ce2 жыл бұрын
@@vova47 I’m not sure where it originated from but a lot of sources claim he said that I don’t know though
@FJCrociata2 жыл бұрын
Most significant omission: Rudolf Serkin who VH several times said he admired highest among all his contemporaries. Other having positive VH quotes: Garrick Ohlsson, Ashkenazy (but early Ashkenazy) and VH's student Ronald Turini.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
You're right, I should have added Serkin specifically. What did he say to Ohlsson? I don't remember that.
@peterlever2534 Жыл бұрын
"Serkin...I loved him like a brother" said VH.
@cmclean6475 Жыл бұрын
Art Tatum too! And thought I read somewhere Peter Nero as well?
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
I have written a more detailed version of this video on my site, there are some pianists that I didn't include in the video because of its length, but that he considers good (Art Tatum, Arthur Rubinstein etc.) and lots of extra information.: www.chopinzee.com/2022/06/vladimir-horowitz-and-his-favorite.html Here are a few facts about this list of Horowitz's favourites: * I didn't get some pianists. For example, according to Horowitz, Josef Hofmann was the first pianist to be influenced. He considered him "a great pianist" and "a first class pianist", but he did not like Hofmann's interpretations, describing him as a "second class musician" (Perhaps there was a rivalry from Rachmaninoff. ). He referred to pianists like Prokofiev and Arthur Rubinstein as "Not Bad" or "I like", but this list is a bit more of a "favorites". That's why I didn't add some names. Maybe there were names that I forgot or overlooked. * For Rachmaninoff, I actually chose the second movment of the First Piano Concerto, which Horowitz also mentioned. However, RCA and Naxos have (automatically) banned viewing of the Video. I couldn't even record any Rachmaninoff recordings, so I put in a vinyl record, even if the audio was a bit distorted. * I included Art Tatum's 1933 recording of Tea for Two, but copyrights did not allow the video to be viewed. In any case, Horowitz doesn't talk about him directly in the books, since it's a bit of a myth, I wanted to remove it when copyrights got in the way. But different sources say that both pianists love each other.
@beatlessteve10102 жыл бұрын
Horowitz said Heinrich Neuhaus was a major influence on him during one of his 1965 interviews.
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
México🇲🇽. 🎶🎶🎹 👏👏👏👏👏👏❣️
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
Mejor No Traducir. 😢
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
Pongan Traductor. 😢
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
No ponían a Ozen. (. solo Horowits ) cuestión de Política de grabación 🎶🎶🎶🎶
@nunosantos-tenor90992 жыл бұрын
Thank you! That is really interesting! :)
@derisleybrittain2 жыл бұрын
Excellent 👍👍👍👍👍
@stephengallucci15928 ай бұрын
I ALWAYS Thought Friedman played this Nocturen the best ! GOOD to have Horowitz on my side! The interpretation is delicate, in love, sensitive and has a 3D effect. It's divine.
@michaelreich23062 жыл бұрын
sehr interessant!
@davidcotuit2 жыл бұрын
H and Freidman!! Fab photo!!
@SehrLukas Жыл бұрын
great compilation, just missing one very important favorite of Horowitz' ART TATUM thank you nonetheless, it's cool to have so many good recordings and quotes in one video 🙂
@OzanFabienGuvener Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Actually I included Art Tatum's 1933 recording of Tea for Two, but copyrights did not allow the video to be viewed. In any case, Horowitz doesn't talk about him directly in the books, since it's a bit of a myth, I wanted to remove it when copyrights got in the way. But different sources say that both pianists love each other.
@SehrLukas Жыл бұрын
ah, i see @@OzanFabienGuvener, didn't know it was a myth... i read somewhere that Horowitz allegedly said sth to the accord of "if he (Tatum) ever decided to play classical piano seriously i'd retire instantly"? 😅 Tatum's Dvorak-recordings are remarkable, not just his own music... do you happen to know if Horowitz was interested in any other stride/jazz-pianists?
@pianomaly95 ай бұрын
What's the Scriabin piece that Neuhaus plays? Would have liked to hear his opinions on his Russian contemporaries Ginzburg, Feinberg, Sofronitsky, Stanislav Neuhaus, Yudina, Grinberg, Nikolayeva, etc.
@1947laurence3 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤
@yannlombard35872 жыл бұрын
Hello, thanks for this post, dont you forget his dear Friend Rudolf Serkin ?
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Did he say anything about Serkin in the books? Maybe I missed it :(
@dieterreichenbacher96602 жыл бұрын
In the Horowitz biography from Glenn Plaskin it is also mentioned that Horowitz highly esteemed Dinu Lipatti and William Kapel..
@davidcotuit2 жыл бұрын
Kapell....America'es greatest native pianist.
@beatlessteve10102 жыл бұрын
I've been on a Horowitz binge since I first heard him play Chopin Nocturne op 55 in f... Way back 10 years ago . Only the Beatles beats him in how long I have binged on music
@seanmortazyt2 жыл бұрын
fantastic
@pianomaniac142 жыл бұрын
Do you know if Horowitz knew Leon Fleisher? I know they both lived in NY while Fleisher was there (I know he was from San Francisco). Being a recent Peabody Conservatory graduate, I'm very curious.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Fleisher talks about Horowitz's pianism a lot, but I don't remember Horowitz talking about him. I'll take a look, if there's a direct relationship between them, I'll write again.
@MrInterestingthings10 ай бұрын
I can't believe Rachmaninoff in Beethoven ! His Chopin playing is ofcourse famous and too little Chopin style but his Beet is out of this world :imaginative and powerful
@zlatan5032 жыл бұрын
26:33 Nice picture! By the way do you know if Horwitz said something about Maestro Claudio Arrau?
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Horowitz complained that Arrau was playing too slow: "I heard his Emperor and it was terrible. He plays so slow, ugh. Also the Waldstein. So slow." Perhaps Horowitz's thoughts on Arrau's prime period are different because he wasn't playing slow at the time. Horowitz generally disliked pianists influenced by the German tradition. He specifically stated this, said "I love Backhaus", and said there "Backhaus was not actually from the German school", like that. Arrau was influenced by German pianists.We see the German influence in him. On the other hand, one of Arrau's favorite pianists is Horowitz. Arrau was very impressed by Horowitz's volcanic piano playing
@zlatan5032 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener That's really interesting... I feel like I am somehow on the Arrau's side because Arrau and Horowitz are my two favorite pianists of all time. Thanks a lot!
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@zlatan503 You're welcome! Soon I can do a similar concept for Arrau: "Arrau's favourites"
@gastonruizoyarce48182 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener Hello! I don't think Horowitz was one of Arrau's favorite pianists, as far as I can remember, in "Conversations with Arrau", Joseph Horowitz asks him what names (from western Europe, if I'm not mistaken) he considered great pianists, and he answers that Rachmaninoff had a tremendous technique but the sound wasn't good, also that Godowsky didn't play anything beyond mezzo forte, I think he also referred to Paderewski not being a great pianist. The only name he said he'd mention is Horowitz, he heard him in Berlin in the 20s and as you said he was impressed, in fact his mother said "you better go practice, because he plays better than you", hahahahaha. But, I don't think Arrau appreciated Horowitz too much, at least in his mature years, nor choosing him as a "favorite", for instance, later in that same book, they mention Chopin's Scherzo N°1 and he said how every pianist was jealous of Horowitz doing the final scale passage in octaves, to what he claims that it's 10 times easier to play that passage in that way than playing it as is written with the accents and tension needed. Another example, in his Desert Island choices he didn't mention Horowitz, he picked recordings by De Larrocha and Gilels but none by Horowitz, so whether Arrau recognized Horowitz as a great pianist I don't think he would choose him as a "favorite". Greetings :)
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@gastonruizoyarce4818 Hello:) Firstly, thank you, you made a good point! I have read the sources you mentioned before. I also read what Arrau said in his book "Great contemporary pianists speak for themselves".Arrau's favorite pianists are clear: Busoni, Cortot, Schnabel, Edwin Fischer, Carreno. A phrase by Arrau: "Who are the -great pianists of the past most remembered? For me they are Busoni, Schnabel, Fischer, Cortot... All thinkers and great interpreters, as well as great pianists." Maybe you're right, he says in the book that he was actually very impressed with Horowitz, but that could be for the Berlin years. But on the other hand, he highly praises Horowitz, In the book you mentioned, I quote what Arrau said about Horowitz: "Horowitz, he's a special case. Tremendous electricity. Him I would call a great pianist." "I remember he played the four Chopin ballades, and the Liszt sonata, and the Funeral March Sonata of Chopin. He also played, very well, the Beethoven Thirty-two Variations. Oh, I was tremendously impressed by him. It was some of the most volcanic playing I've ever heard." What we understand by the word "favorite" is, of course, variable. But one of the pianists he most praised and influenced in his youth seems to be Horowitz. Not as much as Cortot, Fischer, Schnabel or Busoni, but may be mentioned after them. "Desert Island Discs" is a bit more like a piece selection rather than a pianist, but I could be wrong. For example, I don't remember Arrau saying anything special to Giels in the books. But the BBC Radio selection does not have Cortot, Busoni, Fishcer, who are among Arrau's favourites. Arrau would say of Cortot: "Cortot was absolutely marvelous, I adored him." I mean, that selection is more of a selection of works than a selection of pianists. It seems to me that Horowitz is among the pianists he was influenced by and loved. If you have any objections to this, I'd love to hear it :)
@palmerplantagenet2 жыл бұрын
As great as Horowitz was, I don't believe he could have demonstrated Friedman's joie de vivre as shown by the latter in "Viennese Dances of Gaertner arr. Friedman. Or perhaps the easy elegance of Jozef Lhevinne as expressed in his Fruhlingsnacht by Schumann-Liszt. Horowitz had the most extensive use of color and dynamics - though almost always a little 'hard-edged'. The tone was certainly "pressed", yet not necessarily "caressed".
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Saludos. 🙋🌹México
@robertocornacchionialegre2 жыл бұрын
He had a good taste :)
@wodzimierzwosimieta27582 жыл бұрын
Paderewski plays mazurka op. 59 no 2 not no 3
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Oh you're right, I changed the mazurka records because I had a copyright problem at first, I forgot it there. thank you i fix it!
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Cortot. Homenaje. !!!!!!!!!!!! 😘🙏🎼🎶🎶🎶🙋
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Me conmueve la. bondad de Ozein 🎶🎶⏰🎶🤩
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Richter. 🌹🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🙋México.
@CarmenReyes-em9np10 ай бұрын
Gran técnica. México.
@luargambino2 жыл бұрын
Horowitz does not talk about Hoffman, which is strange because his influence is remarkable.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
He actually talks about him, he's a great pianist but says I don't like his interpretations. Maybe Horowitz was a jealousy caused by Rachmaninoff. Because Rachmaninoff said: Hofmann the biggest, followed by Horowitz.
@pianobern692 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener Wasn't Rachmaninoff also a huge admirer of Gilels?
@berlinzerberus2 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener He sometimes was 'bitchy' and as almost every artist a little narcissistic! ;) Ich bin der Meinung, das Hoffman viel mehr Rachmaninoffs pianistischem Ideal entsprach als Horowitz, der freilich sein 3. Konzert fantastisch spielte. Aber an die Fantasie und das Raffinement eines Jozef Hoffman kam Horowitz bei weitem nicht heran und konnte ihn nicht übertreffen. Das wußte solch eine Persönlichkeit wie Rachmaninoff natürlich!
@DihelsonMendonca9 ай бұрын
Most people judge the pianist by the quality of the recording. Flirentino has a wonderful recording, you hear even the harmonics. If the recording was so bad as some from 1020, I doubt many people would like. 😅😅😅
@Johannes_Brahms65 Жыл бұрын
What I like most about Horowitz is that he said that Beethoven couldn't have written one note that's written by Schubert. Not one note! (Of course this has to be understood in a certain context).
@militaryandemergencyservic3286 Жыл бұрын
note that he didn't comment on Gilels (to whom Rachmaninoff gave his medal)...
@gatesurfer2 жыл бұрын
Playlist please.
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
Exelente Estudio 💌🎶🎶 Chopin. 😂
@cmclean6475 Жыл бұрын
How about the jazz pianists he admired? Wasn't it Art Tatum, andf even perhaps Peter Nero?
@dorfmanjones2 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind Horowitz never actually heard Busoni play. He might be referring to some acoustic gramophone records.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
You are right, I had to specifically state this in the video.
@jeremyd10212 жыл бұрын
No mention of ABM? It is well known that Horowitz was a great admirer, whilst at the same time without wanting to admit as much, even going as far as attending one of his Carneige Hall recitals and listening from behind a curtain so that no one could see him.
@pieroalessandrocassano82872 жыл бұрын
È vero legga l intervista su piano time del 1986 credo che ho riportato nelle mie note
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Horowitz says of him: "Interesting pianist, but I think he is just a little bit meshuga."
@mkeysou8122 жыл бұрын
Horowitz, the Queen B that he is, dishes out backhanded compliments like he dishes out octaves
@jedrzejsteszewski6694 Жыл бұрын
Fiorentino ❤
@francodegrandis75312 жыл бұрын
Manca Emil Gilels uno dei piu' amati pianisti di Horowitz, basta leggere la sua biografia
@dkant45112 жыл бұрын
Left out Art Tatum!
@militaryandemergencyservic32862 жыл бұрын
nice
@CarmenReyes-em9np2 жыл бұрын
Para mí Horowkts para Lizst. 💐
@Piflaser2 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Angelich and Radu Lupu R.I.P.
@RB-bj9ms2 жыл бұрын
Amazing that he had no comment about Arthur Rubenstein.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Actually he did. Horowitz liked Rubinstein's Spanish repertoire. But he said Rubinstein didn't have good technique: "He never had a great technique, but certain things he played well. I heard him play some of the Chopin etudes, the easier ones, with great panache." Actually, there is some sarcasm here. What Horowitz is implying is that Rubinstein plays simple works too flamboyantly. But he didn't say Rubinstein was a bad pianist. He did not consider Rubinstein among his favourites, but referred to him as a "good pianist".
@CarmenReyes-em9np4 ай бұрын
Y Jorje Bolet 🎼🎶💞💞
@PianoJFAudioSheet2 жыл бұрын
Let's not forget Horowitz stating: "I want to be Cziffra!"
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Whoops, I hadn't seen that! Thanks for the addition.
@srothbardt2 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvenerDid Horowitz teach Byron Janis? Whatever happened to him?
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
@@srothbardt For some reason Horowitz doesn't mention him in the books. But the reason for this is probably personal. I read that there was something going on between Janis and Horowitz's wife, but I don't remember the details.
@pianomaly95 ай бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener Any info on whatever happened to Alexander Fiorillo and Coleman Blumfeld, two pupils mentioned in Glenn Plaskin's biography?
@gerardkuntzmann212 жыл бұрын
And where is Art Tatum ?
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Various untrue myths arose between Art Tatum and Horowitz, even linking Horowitz's quitting the piano for a period to Tatum. These were unrealistic, but Horowitz seems to have liked Tatum's pianist. According one source, Horowitz enjoyed Tatum's wonderful arpeggios. But there is no exaggerated praise, even when Horowitz is asked about his favorite pianists, he does not mention Tatum. According another source, Henry Pleasants, who had covered the jazz beat and written with perspicacity about jazz singers, told the story about Horowitz sneaking in to listen to the jazz pianist Art Tatum. He was terribly impressed with Tatum's technique and his easy, natural way of playing, and on one occasion couldn't understand how Tatum did what he did in 'Tea for Two.' So he introduced himself Tatum admitted that yeah, he had heard of Vladimir Horowitz. The two men had a pleasant talk, and then Horowitz asked Tatum how long it had taken him to learn 'Tea for Two.' Tatum looked at him as though he were crazy. 'I just made it up,' he said. Horowitz went home and worked up his own arrangement of 'Tea for Two,' which he played as a party piece.
@leonardodelyrarodrigues37522 жыл бұрын
Jan Paderewski, good Chopin.
@pianomaly95 ай бұрын
O.K. saw the dropdown. My bad.
@CarmenReyes-em9np4 ай бұрын
.Bolet. Y mas.
@pieroalessandrocassano82872 жыл бұрын
When he came to play in La Scala theatre in Milan they asked him in an interview"Do you have any favourite Italian pianists","I like and admire very much Michelangeli".."And Pollini ?"asked the communist Italian interviewer"I don't know him"..he was a great "Sir"..Infact how could a colourist like him love a "white and black" materialist pianist metronomical playing like Pollini?
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
Ya pasa bien el sonido. .NO. ANUNCiOS. 😮
@ronwilsontringue65742 жыл бұрын
Liberace could play very fast - especially the Jones Organ Etude in H sharp (minor) without foot pedals
@funklover242 жыл бұрын
Rachmaninov's Beethoven is too high (c sharp minor) and therefore probably faster, than he played.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
I did not use the direct recording due to copyrights, the video was blocked.
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
No Robar Musica.🎹🎶🎶🎶🫶
@aotgun2 жыл бұрын
Türkçe çevirisi olsaydı da okusaydık Horowitz'in yorumlarını.
@OzanFabienGuvener2 жыл бұрын
Biraz fazla özet halinde olsa da temel fikri çevireyim sizin için. Rahmaninov'u en büyük piyanist ve idolü gördüğünü ve en iyi çaldığı şeylerden birinin Beethoven olduğunu; Cortot'yu en iyi Chopin ve Schumann yorumcusu olarak gördüğünü ve çok entelektüel biri olduğunu; Friedman için kimse Op. 55 no. 2'yi ondan iyi çalamayacağını ve bazen bazı fikirleri tuhaf bulsa da onun çalışından çok etkilendiğini; Barere için muazzam tekniği olduğunu ve Blumenfeld'in sol el etüdünü mucizevi biçimde çaldığını; yeni nesil Slav piyanistler arasında bir tek Richter'den etkilendiğini; sürekli öyle çaldığı için bir noktadan sonra sıkılsa da Gieseking'in hafif tuşesinin onu çok büyülediğini ve etkilediğini; Lhevinne'nin teknik Chopin etütler konusunda bir numara olduğunu; Bachkaus'un Alman ekolünde olmadığını ve çok etkileyici çaldığını, Liszt öğrencilerini pek sevmediğini ama Sauer'in istisna olup salon müziğinde -Chopin valsleri gibi- çok iyi bulduğunu ve salon müziği harici yapıtları da -Beethoven sonatları gibi- çok iyi icra edebildiğini, Paderewski'nin tekniğinin eleştirilse de aslında zamanla bozulduğunu ve mazurkaları çok güzel çaldığını; Busoni'nin benzersiz bir deha olduğunu; Almanya günlerinde Fischer'dan pek etkilenmediğini belirtse de Mozart'ını çok beğendiğini; Neuhaus teknik olarak zayıf olsa da tekniğin değil yorum derinliğinin onu etkilediğini ve birçok piyanist/besteciyi Neuhaus'un ona tanıttığını; İspanyol repertuvarında Larrocha'nın en iyisi olduğunu; Schnabel'ın Brahms yorumundan bir hayli etkilendiğini; İtalya'da kalırken radyoda sürekli duyduğu Fiorentino'yu çok beğendiğini söylüyor. Bunun dışında beğenmediği piyanistlere de değiniyor, onları videoda yer vermedim ama size bahsedeyim. Gould'un Wagner çalışını aptalca bulduğunu, Arturo Bendetti Michelengeli'nin enteresan bir piyanist olduğunu ama biraz delirmiş olduğunu, Arrau'nun yavaş çalışının sıktığını, André Watts gibi salt teknik piyanistlerden nefret etttiğini, Rosenthal'ın çalışından nefret ettiğini ve cümlemelerini sevmediğini, Hofmann'ın müthiş bir piyanist ama ikinci sınıf müzisyen olduğunu belirtir.
@aotgun2 жыл бұрын
@@OzanFabienGuvener 🙏 harikasınız. Çok teşekkür ederim
@329376676 Жыл бұрын
Horowitz on Rubinstein: He's as good as me. I made that up
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
PersonalisalizAdas
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
El sonido del piano ,no pasa bien ,casi siempre. un Stanwey. 😂
@CarmenReyes-em9np4 ай бұрын
Por que Maninov? No es de lo MEJOR.
@thomgeo80732 жыл бұрын
Rachmaninoff is GOD'S Flame
@ianhall38222 жыл бұрын
Maybe. But it was Liberace who laughed all the way to the bank...
@ChopinIsMyBestFriend2 жыл бұрын
he just like me doe
@ppiiaannoo2 жыл бұрын
Yuja Wang?
@gatesurfer2 жыл бұрын
Born after died.
@ppiiaannoo2 жыл бұрын
@@gatesurfer :D
@arpeggiomikey Жыл бұрын
Yuja, born in 1987, was two years old when Volodya passed; however, I'm certain he would be floored ("flabbergasted" was an adjective he used a lot) by the incredible feat she achieved in performing all four Rachmaninoff concerti -- plus the Paganini Rhapsody! -- in one marathon evening, even wearing a different dress for each work (let's see Volodya pull THAT off!)! 😉🤣🍾🥂😋👍💝
@CarmenReyes-em9np5 ай бұрын
No es mi favorito Rachmaninov. 🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶
@CarmenReyes-em9np4 ай бұрын
Cziffra Noooooooooooo
@CarmenReyes-em9np9 ай бұрын
No suena bien el piano.
@ingeniero0000711 ай бұрын
Cziffra was better than horowitz by far, this one could not differentiate every note, he was actually deaf about it
@barrygordon532311 ай бұрын
Cziffra was with Simon barere had ,the greatest technique I have heard among the older guys,and were great,but cziffra never had Horowitz huge sound ,and electrically he never had that either, Horowitz in fact makes them all seem tame. . musically give me Claudio arrau,,,