@@user-qu2fs9rt6l Seems to admire your historical saying/view. But post-Maoism, the black or white cat theory realistically and pragmatically brought CCP to be today. 40 years did what West 200 years achieved as CCP claimed. Of efficiency is 5 times, you still call it "做起来最不容易"? At least I have to agree that "胜平是我最喜欢的粉红". CCP never cheats us. CCP only cheats Leninism and Karl too. [trans.] 似乎很欣賞你的歷史說法/觀點。但後毛澤東時代,黑貓白貓理論現實而務實地造就了今天的中共。 40年做了中共宣稱的西方200年所取得的成就。效率是5倍,你還叫它“做起來最不容易”?至少我不得不同意“勝平是我最喜歡的粉色”。中共從不欺騙我們。中共也只會欺騙列寧主義和卡爾。
@@user-qu2fs9rt6l [trans.] 你的觀點表達一直很一致。你的觀點是不可否認的、熟悉的和流行的,但非常傳統。你的推理依賴於一種價值來表達你的謙虛情緒,使用諸如“實屬 or 來自不易”” 巨大貢獻” “摸到, 做到” 大統, 平衡政體, 國家獨立, 經濟騰飛等詞。但是我尊重而非佩慕你這樣的評論。另外,您的敘述並不難理解,儘管我對詳細辯論您的敘述不感興趣。我們只能保留我們不同的敘述格式,因為它們是交換意見的基礎。 “用40年過去西方200年的過程” 是中共宣稱的。我不認為CCP“走過了”。這是一個致命的未完成的旅程,因為要完成它需要一個拆除中共或列寧主義思想的代價。這裡有兩個原因--一個是社會哲學,另一個是卡爾的共產黨宣言和弗拉基米爾·伊里奇支持的威權主義的宿命。 “台灣同胞,多說無益”我不同意你的看法。你也不能阻止他們,台灣人把他們的故事帶到世界或聯合國和世界衛生組織的論壇上。至少他們有這樣不可剝奪的權利。他們的善意和無威脅的建議與“妄議中央”形成鮮明對比,即使你的中共敢於武力入侵台灣,也不會被接受,並成功地讓全世界數以百萬計的台灣人開口說“多說”。你對此無能為力。大量居住在海外的香港人目前也在做類似的事情。感謝北京維護香港主權的行動。 不管是幸運還是不幸,70多年前建立的政權一如既往地穩定。甚至美國也一直聲稱他們對中共政權更迭不感興趣,而是“誘導其遵循規則基礎秩序的國際行為”。如果一個政權可以被和平演變地颠覆,那不應該是一件令人愉快的事嗎?它不剛好是社會穩定的標指之一嗎?我認同。 我很高興你設定了這樣一個黃金攤牌時刻在2049 年。美國自拜登就職以來,他的政府宣稱其對華戰略--遏制(軍事)、合作(全球人文基礎)和競爭(廣義的, 產品製造)。該策略與 Mike Pompeo 在 2020 年 5 月發表的尼克松圖書館評論一致。不過,如果你能活到那時或 2099 年,它也符合你的誓言“2049 年見”。 在我看來,從現在開始再過 27 年對我來說太長了。這麼長的時間可以推翻另一個紅色毛澤東的統治(1949-1976),就像鄧小平和他的同事所做的那樣。我打賭 10 年或 2035 年左右應該足夠長能看到結果。也就是“東昇西降(衰)”,或在一個”習主席萬歲!” 的口號下與其相反 Your view expression has been very consistent. Your perspective is undeniable, familiar and popular but very traditional. Your reasoning relies on a value to demonstrate your modest emotion by using words such as “實屬 or 來自不易” “巨大貢獻” “摸到”or “做到” (大統, 平衡政體, 國家獨立, 經濟騰飛) However I respect you rather than admire with such comments. Also your narrative is not hard to understand although I am not interested in argue or debate with in detail on your narrative. We only can keep our different narratives formats as they are as a base for exchanging opinions. “用40年走過西方200年的進程” was claimed by CCP. I don’t think CCP had walked through “走過了”. It is a fatal uncompleted journey because to complete it need a price of dismantle CCP or the Leninism ideology. Two reasons here - One is social philosophical another is fate of authoritarianism back by Karl’s Communist Manifesto Summary and Vladimir Ilyich. “台灣同胞,多說無益” I disagree with you. Also you cannot stop them, Taiwan people to bring their narrative to the world or to the UN and WHO forum. At least they have such unstrippable right. Your nice kind and non-threatening advice contrast to “Wuang Yi Central” (criticize politics without official permission) is not accepted even your CCP dare to invade Taiwan by force and succeeded there are millions Taiwan people around world would open their mouths to “多說”. It is nothing you can do about it. Heaps Hong Kongers living overseas are doing the similar at the moment. Appreciated Peking’s HK sovereignty protecting actions. Regardless fortunately or unfortunately, the regime established over 70 year ago are as stable as ever. Even US kept claim they are not interested in CCP regime change but “to induce its international behaviour following the rule base order”. If a 政权 can be 和平演變地颠覆 one should be delightful, shouldn’t they? Is it one of social stability indicators? I think so. I am glad that you set such a golden showdown moment on 2049. The US since Biden’s inauguration his administration claimed its China strategy - Containment (militarily), Cooperate (global humanistic ground) and Competition (Production Making). The strategy aligns with Mike Pompeo’s Nixon Library remarks made in May 2020. So does it to your vow “2049年見” nevertheless if you could live till then or 2099. In my view taking another 27 years from now on is way too long form me. Such long time could overthrow another red Mao’s ruling (1949 - 1976) like what Deng Shao Pin and his colleagues did. I bet 10 years or around 2035 it should be longer enough to see the result. That is if it would be “East Rising West Down (Decline)” or another way around under a slogan: Long Live Shi Chairman!