French, Germans and CONQUERING VOLCANO? | WARNO Gameplay

Twitch 📺 / vulcanhdgaming
Having a look at the new French units in the game, under command of Territorialkommando Sud, on the cool new map Volcano!
Early Access Gameplay.
WARNO Gameplay Playlist! ► bit.ly/WARNOGa...
Type: 3v3
Map: Volcano
Battlegroup: Territorialkommando Sud
Battlegroup Codes: bit.ly/WARNOBa...
Thanks to Eugen Systems for providing Early Access!
Buy games I play and support the channel here! ► www.nexus.gg/V...
Enjoyed the video? Here's some more! ► goo.gl/vHwUWj
Support the channel on Patreon (it's a huge help!) ► / vulcanhdgaming
Find awesome Total War content here! ► goo.gl/QAAZHN
Join my Discord! ► / discord
Contact Me!
Twitter: / vulcanhdgaming
Facebook: / vulcanhdgaming
Instagram: / vulcanhdgaming
Steam: steamcommunity....
Patreon: / vulcanhdgaming
Player.me: player.me/vulc...
Music used: End Game by Per Kiilstofte
machinimasound....
Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
(creativecommons...)

[@chrunkel]

I was “Ernesto” and it was a pleasure to play with you. Even if you ignored my greetings at the beginning of the match.

[@VulcanHDGaming]

Sorry if I missed it during the video, during the live cast I most of the time would have acknowledged you. Apologies if I didn't!

[@VampiroGaming]

Thanks for bringing us so many entertaining and well commented / cinematographed games.

[@Boss_Man1371]

Thoughts on the change back to the forest all being the same vs how in SD2 with its light and dense forest? I personally think SD2's forest make much more sense and add to the gameplay positively.

[@MadManchou]

There's quite a few gameplay elements from Steel Division which would do well being ported in WARNO : - "drastic" range differences (especially between AT options) - surrendering units (= more useful suppression strikes) - Penetrations on AFVs (rather than damage = pen - armour) - Phases & deployment types (= more strategy in the deck building element) - forest types Edit : also getting rid of vehicle fuel/range because it makes zero sense within the scope of the game

[@Boss_Man1371]

@@MadManchou I agree with all the above though the full doesn't really bother me either way.

[@agentbarron3945]

@@Boss_Man1371 fuel is just completely unrealistic, in wg:rd its actually insane, an ifv cant even traverse a map fully before running out of range, I mean yeah, they are fuel hungry, but I doubt you have to refuel them every 20km

[@junibug6790]

Honestly, I'm a bit surprised you set your ATGMs to auto-fire on empty, unarmed transports. That gameplay setting pretty much neutralizes the, er, "strategy" of transport suicide-scouting. ;)

[@VulcanHDGaming]

Sure, but especially at the start there. The ATGMs were the only real thing I had to kill them quick enough.

[@thomasdubbeldeman3864]

0:33 wel technically the AMX10 is a Armoured Car and not a Tank, since it doesnt have tank tracks

[@gattonero2915]

*AMX-10RC AMX-10 is way too general of a name that one can confuse with another AMX-10 (AMX-10P tracked IFV, the French "Marder" that has nothing to do with the AMX-1RC Wheeled Fire support/recconnaissance/tank-destroying armored car)

[@AnoNymous-gm5oc]

French doctrine considers them 'tanks', albeit light ones designed to 'fight for information' in a recon role but tanks/chars nonetheless!

[@side-fish]

You know, I'm just wondering. It would be interesting if that radar recon unit with exceptional optics can be targeted with SEAD. Then again, you can't turn off the radar of the recon, so I dunno. But if you could, would be an interesting mechanic. Turning it on makes it exceptional optics, turning it off makes it just good or whatever.

[@junibug6790]

Wouldn't really make sense from either a gameplay or realism perspective. HARM missiles require that their launching aircraft be "locked on" by a hostile radar targeting system in order to follow those signals back to the source. Gameplay wise, exceptional-optics units are not so powerful that they need an "insta-delete" button. Also, it would be super infuriating if SEAD aircraft kept wasting their missiles on unarmed recon vehicles rather than much more deadly SAMs. ;)

[@side-fish]

@@junibug6790 You mean like using them as a decoy instead? I never thought of it that way. Yeah, I can imagine that to be a great disappointment.

[@MickeyMouse-bo6ug]

With radar, they should not need LOS to spot either.

[@olleronn616]

This type of strategy isn't really my cup of tea but the maps truly are gorgeous.

[@nicholasd5629]

This division seems to have a lot of issues. It seems like artillery support really could of come in handy in this match. Esp with suppressing enemy atgms. Seems like this division should get access to the LARS-2 MLRS or the M110-A2 203mm gun.

[@Paveway-chan]

I dunno about that. You have an absolutely killer air tab instead

[@Killlerofthings]

Love it, keep it up, moreno-warno

[@Triple-A-Duracell-battery]

I love these Warno videos man!!

[@kohtalainenalias]

What are the biggest differencies between Warno and Wargame: Red Dragon?

[@junibug6790]

Aside from the obvious of massively upgraded visuals and sound and much more intelligent AI, there are also Smart Orders, Rules of Engagement, a historically-accurate division system, a line-of-sight tool, new unit mechanics such as smoke-launchers on vehicles, man-portable and towed artillery and (when the game nears release) 4 dynamic Army General campaigns that can be played in single-player, co-op or PvP.

[@DeitritusFillamore]

such a cool map

[@carltarrant1080]

Thanks for the excellent gaming video.

[@redjacc7581]

m48 push across the open, where was the smoke so they could get close? wheres the arty to clear out the AA units?

[@VulcanHDGaming]

Probably could have used smoke a bit but ATGMs are actually better at close range so the M48s would have a hard time regardless.

[@FrostRare]

Volcano is bananas.

[@isserdigan2835]

How do you resell the transports??

[@Pikilloification]

Click the Sell button

[@djporsche3922]

you defo carried the team there

[@redjacc7581]

when your planes come in to get those helicopters, why O why do you keep moving them left right over the enemy AA?

[@VulcanHDGaming]

There was even more to the right.

[@MickeyMouse-bo6ug]

The lack of fall back and slower retreat due to cohesion is off-putting.

[@davidlefranc6240]

Not a pro but some heavier units would be welcomed in this french deck and nice game it was packed with some action for sure 😄

[@redjacc7581]

cool match though

[@МаксимБогатырев-у7р]

На точки не интересно хочю технеку видеть как поей идёт огонь ане карту одни точки насамом интьересном

[@Mystery-ASMR]

Whoever is reading this, im just trying to spread some positive energy, so I wish you a beautiful day, and stay healthy!😌

[@МаксимБогатырев-у7р]

Аможна на русском и неболтать я хотьелбы звук игры нарусский язык и побльиже ане постояную карту