Was partition of India happened because of Jinnah? I JINNAH I PARTITION 1947 I MUSLIM LEAGUE

[@matloobrab6128]

सच्चाई दिखाने के लिए आपको सलाम ।लगे रहिए पूरा देश आपके साथ है। --:::--- जय छात्र, जय किसान, जय संविधान, जय भारत ।

[@SukhPalSingh-je5ci]

मुकेश जी आप बहुत ही अच्छी और जरूरी जानकारी डॉक्टर राम पुनियानी के माध्यम से समाज में पहुंचा रहे हैं। आपके लिए सैल्यूट

[@Universalhandicraft]

Beshak 👌👌👌

[@rakeshkumarsharma6349]

Dekh tera damad like kar diya ab to khush hai

[@rajeevtyagi225]

आदरणीय बन्धु इस पुस्तक को पढ़ें, जो कभी 1920 में भारत में लिखी गईं थीं जब इसकी कीमत मात्र 2.50 रूपए थी आज अमेरिका इंग्लैंड में कालेज में पढ़ाई-लिखाई जाती है इसकी कीमत ₹1600 हैं। आपकों पढ़कर पता चलेगा कि भारतीय नागरिकों के साथ हमारे देश के गांधी नेहरू जैसे लोगों ने कितनी बड़ी गद्दारी करते थे।🙏 The Master would union scheme (Published 1920) Author :Alokananda Mahabharti The Master's Dayanand Scheme of World Federation on the Basis of All People of the world are of the one family" Fatherhood of God and Brotherhood of Man

[@musharrafsulemani]

@@rakeshkumarsharma6349 tera jija modi ne teri bhan ko kidhar rkh ke aaya hai

[@ShahbazKhan-ni3ol]

You missed Khlafat Movement which has a great effect on Muslims all over the world and created hatred of British Rule and confronted British even to the extent that refused to learn English and their Culture on the contrary Hindus co operated and supported British Rule

[@truthaloneprevailsunitedhu220]

अब तक हम जिन्ना को बंटवारे का दोषी मानते रहे हैं। लेकिन आज हमारी समझ में आ गया है कि बँटवारे का असल अपराधी हिंदू महासभा और RSS था।

[@VijayKumar-xb3pg]

अच्छा असली अपराधी हिन्दू महा सभा था तो तुम जिन्ना का सपोर्ट कर रहे हो इसका मतलब जिन्ना तुम्हारा अम्मी का भतार होगा और हिन्दू लोग तिहारी अम्मी को रखैल बनाना चाह इसी लिए हिंदुओ से नफरत करते हो

[@vikashdhillon04]

Jinha b responsible tha

[@truthaloneprevailsunitedhu220]

@@vikashdhillon04 obviously.

[@arundey4029]

Tab kiya RSS itna Strong tha,Tab ka sab nirnay Jawaharlal Neheru Ka Congress Leta tha.RSS kese Jimmedar ho Sakta hai?

[@SajidAli-ir3sj]

jimmedar sabhi the jinnah nehru Patel. RSS Hindu mahasabha..yeh tho aaj tak is desh m nafrat ke bij bo rahe he

[@RanjiniDavidson]

Dr Ram Puniyani Ji deserves the Nobel Prize for being an Unbiased Historian

[@hiralalpandey3963]

राम पुनियानी जी,विषय वस्तु की पूर्ण तैयारी के साथ अपने लेक्चर तैयार कीजिए।अधकचरा ज्ञान खतरनाक होता है।

[@rajeevtyagi225]

देश आज तक भी वास्तविक सत्य से अभी बहुत दूर है।🙏

[@qazis111]

वास्तविकता के लिए हिंदू महासभा और आरएसएस का इतिहास पढ़िए

[@anishjaat6411]

@@qazis111 or Tu sachai janne ke liye books padh ase chutiyo ko sun kar mahachutiya mt bn

[@SAFFRONINFERNO]

@@qazis111 Quran Padhke Mohammed ki Vatavikta pata chal gayi

[@jantawarriors4719]

​@@SAFFRONINFERNOapne bhi padhle kbhi jatiwad aur dhong bhara padha hai

[@SAFFRONINFERNO]

@@jantawarriors4719 Maine padhli tabhi tere jaisa CHAWAL BORI CHEW TEA NAHI BANA JO GHAR PE MOOD BANAKE GHAR CHALATHA HAI 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@anilgangurde4745]

यह एक बहुत ही बढ़िया उम्दा एवं सटीक जानकारी है धन्यवाद 🙏 आभार

[@shahajanmulani9779]

डॉ.राम साहब और डा.मुकेश साहब आप लोग भारत देश कि मुल बुनियाद पर जो असली इतिहास की जानकारी दे रहे हैं अगर हर भारतीय🇮🇳👳 आपकी बातों पर भरोसा करते हैं तोभारतीय जनता जाती वाद छोड़ कर भाईचारा क़ायम करे तो भारत कि शान बढेगी और दुनिया में भारत महागुरू बन सकता है और शायद इसमें आपका योगदान ही देश को सही राह दिखाने की आपको हमारी शुभ कामनाएं........

[@kamaljhamat6620]

जबर्दस्त सच्चाई पेश करते हो प्रो पुनियानी साहब मुकेश कुमार साहब बहुत धन्यवाद एवं सलाम जी

[@taufiquekhan5568]

विवाद इस लिए ख़त्म नहीं होता । कियो की सच्चाइयों को कोई क़बूल नहीं करता आज नफ़रत और झूट को बेचा जा रहा है और अन्ध भक्ति में लोग ख़रीदार भी बनते जा रहे है ।

[@RaviShankar-ts8fy]

जिन्ना आरएसएस बिश्वहिन्दुमहासभा के कारण देश का बंटवारा हुआ

[@akhilmehta7875]

read pakistan and partition of india by dr br ambedkar .....you will get clear thught why partition happened in hinduitan....... . The theory of Partition goes back to 1887 when Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, founder of the Aligarh Muslim University, declared that Hindus and Muslims belong to two different nations. It was in 1933 that Choudhry Rahmat Ali, a scholar at the University of Cambridge, coined the word ‘Pakistan’. Mohammad Ali Jinnah devoted the last two decades of his life to realise his dream of an independent Pakistan. That the Pakistan that emerged in 1947 was a mere shadow of what he had wanted is a different story. “We will either have a divided India or a destroyed India,” thundered Jinnah on the Direct Action Day.

[@akhilmehta7875]

IN PAKISTAN AND PARTITION OF INDIA BY BR AMBEDKAR YOU GET CLARITY.........WHAT VEER SAVARKAR HAS SAID....READ YOU OWN ..........HISTORY CAN BE NARRATED DEPENDS ON WHO IS NARRATING THE HISTORY.

[@gajendratripathi452]

Sahi kaha hindu masabha ne aur saverker logon ne desh ka bantwara chaha.

[@akhilmehta7875]

@@gajendratripathi452 Strange as it may appear, Mr. Savarkar and Mr. Jinnah, instead of being opposed to each other on the one nation versus two nations issue, are in complete agreement about it. Both agree, not only agree but insist, that there are two nations in India-one the Muslim nation and the other the Hindu nation. They differ only as regards the terms and conditions on which the two nations should live. Mr. Jinnah says India should be cut up into two, Pakistan and Hindustan, the Muslim nation to occupy Pakistan and the Hindu nation to occupy Hindustan. Mr. Savarkar on the other hand insists that, although there are two nations in India, India shall not be divided into two parts, one for Muslims and the other for the Hindus; that the two nations shall dwell in one country and shall live under the mantle of one single constitution; that the constitution shall be such that the Hindu nation will be enabled to occupy a predominant position that is due to it and the Muslim nation made to live in the position of subordinate co-operation with the Hindu nation. In the struggle for political power between, the two nations the rule of the game which Mr. Savarkar prescribes is to be one man one vote, be the man Hindu or Muslim. In his scheme a Muslim is to have no advantage which a Hindu does not have. Minority is to be no justification for privilege and majority is to be no ground for penalty. The State will guarantee the Muslims any defined measure of political power in the form of Muslim religion and Muslim culture. But the State will not guarantee secured seats in the Legislature or in the Administration and, if such guarantee is insisted upon by the Muslims,/16/ such guaranteed quota is not to exceed their proportion to the general population. Thus by confiscating its weightages, Mr. Savarkar would even strip the Muslim nation of all the political privileges it has secured so far. BY BR AMBEDKAR IN PAKISTAN AND PARTITON OF INDIA ..........TRUTH IS MUCH MORE COMPLEX ...........VEER SAVARKAR HAS PROPUNDED HINDUTVA....WHY ????SEE SAVARKAR BY VIKRAM SAMPATH BOOK......SEE VIDEO TYPE ON KZbin

[@brajkishorebalendu2010]

@@akhilmehta7875 आज भी योगी कह रहा है कि हिन्दू और मुस्लिम एक साथ नहीं रह सकते हैं! यह देश को तोड़ने वाले नहीं है??उस समय भी संघी ने देश में दंगा फसाद कराने के लिए पागल हो गया था जो आगे चलकर देश टूटा / पहले जिन्ना हिन्दू और मुस्लिम के बीच भाई चारे की बात करते थे पर संघी के नफरत झूठ मक्कारी धूर्तता को देश कर वो भी अलग देश की मांग करने लगे!

[@kadwasach5799]

ब्रिटिश नहीं चाहता था कि जिस देश में उसने राज किया वह देश उससे आगे निकल जाए इस लिए भारत का विभाजन करा दिया 😥

[@ganeshbanerjee9841]

क्या पाक के साथ मिलकर रहते तो हम ज्यादा विकास करते ?

[@kadwasach5799]

@@ganeshbanerjee9841 बिल्कुल अगर धर्म से उठ कर सरकार चलाते ब्रिटिश से पहले के दौर में United India का GDP पूरी दुनिया में सब से ज़्यादा थी

[@ganeshbanerjee9841]

@@kadwasach5799 मध्यकाल में भारत दुनिया का सबसे समृद्ध देश था। बल्कि यह कहना चाहिए कि बाकि देश ज्यादा खस्ताहाल थे। उस समय देश की समृद्धि उतनी ही थी, जितना कृषि से संभव था। राजा-नवाब और उनके अमीर-उमराह शान से रहते थे। आम किसान मजदूर का जीवन बहुत दयनीय था।

[@the_rhythm_shorts]

@Stock 4me nahi Pakistan se sath agar milkar rakhte to

[@the_rhythm_shorts]

पीछा करना

[@alisheransari2454]

भारत का बटवारा करके महात्मा गाँधी ने इस्लाम से हिन्दुइज्म को बचा लिया .

[@arunmirzapuri5331]

हिंदुस्तान या भारत मे भी मुसलमान भाई भी महफूज रह सके एक पहलू यह भी है।

[@9935310660]

Kitni honest analysis karte hain aap log. Really great...poori video dekhkar bhi ye samajh me nahi aata ki ki aap log ka personal jhukao kis taraf hai...amazing

[@nitesh192]

India me bhai 70 percent log liberal thoughts ke hain .kisi se nafrat ni krte hain wo

[@ramnareshtyagi4371]

अब धर्म और जाति के आधार पर राजनीति होती है।धर्म और राजनीति से अलग रहना ही बेहतर है।

[@tauqeerfarooqui6143]

मुकेश जी आपको साधुवाद बहुत अच्छा बोलते है ओर सच बोलते है

[@sunilchaudhary5674]

1857 kranti was started by dhan singh kotwal from meerut as per english document, not by mangal pandey, infact he was hanged much well before 1857 kranti in bengal, he never came to meerut during that time, i have offical documents

[@rameshseth2846]

@@sunilchaudhary5674 ¹

[@joyadityadas7525]

@@sunilchaudhary5674 ⁰uougfggotthlh8ig8g9o8fllflftl

[@lancydsouza1326]

No, it all started in 1923, started by savarkar, so called veer. Savarkar was the one who devided. Truth is always bitter, but it's true.

[@Elpapi047]

🤪🤪🤪🤪u were not there..u r saying according to ur beliefs

[@kkrishna1718]

Acha to hai. Jyada muslims chale gaye. Inke saath reh paate tum?

[@MayankKumar-ge7tb]

Nope it started in 1880s by Syed Ahmed Khan

[@kartiknaidu6564942]

Do u know why Savarkar changed his view wat happened just before 1923...half knowledge is worse

[@ashwanichandola7899]

Beta 1923 Savarkar was in jail

[@praveendixit.parambhattaraka]

The discussion is clearly two liars discussing a subject they have very less idea about. Also, i believe they are not well versed in the subject and discussed it superficially with cliche examples and academically shallow discussion. Some doubts on the discussion. 5:12 Bahadur Shah Zafar never led the Revolt. He himself was forced by Sepoys (all the evidence and his statements proves this) 5:40 There was no post of Viceroy in 1857. Governor General was Canning. Elphinstone was Governor of Bombay. 7:48 Hindu Maha Sabha was formed in 1915, 9 years after Muslims demanded separate constitutional principles for Hindus and Muslims (Shimla Deputation, 1906) and 6 years after application of those principles (Separate Electorate, 1909) 10:19 Not joining Muslim League do not makes one non Liberal. Jinnah chose Lincoln's Inn to study Law over other Inns because on main gate name of Muhammad is written as great Lawgiver. 10:45 Fourteen point demand (separation of Sind, NWFP etc) of Jinnah came (1929) after Nehru Committee report (1928) 14:25 "jyada muslim to Congress ke saath hain- Ram Puniyani" In 1937 Elections, Congress contested only 58 out of 482 Muslim seats and won only 26. Congress did not had confidence to even fight in 15% of Muslim Seats. 15:10 No primary proof is available for the claim that term Pakistan (given as Pakstan by Rehmat Ali) was abbreviation of Punjab, Sind etc etc. It do not have B for Balochistan and B for Bengal. The theory was put forward to claim that Kashmir's K was in original plans of Pakistan. 15:55 Only opposing Pakistan do not means that a group is pro unity. Jamat e Islami opposed it to ensure entire Subcontinent should be converted. Jameeyat e Ulema e Hind opposed it as it will restrict Islam in 1/3 landmass. 20:35 Why Mindu Mahasabha-Muslim League coalition should not be seen as effort of reconciliation by both ?? Only presence of Congress is prerequisite of declaring a coalition Secular ? 20:55 He opposed very very strongly against his daughter Dina marrying a Parsi (antarjattiya vivah) and both were not on talking terms for many years and called her simply Mrs Wadia 27:15 On record first one to clearly give Two Nation Theory as used it in Politics was Sir Syed Ahmed- "But this is not the case with our country, which is peopled with different nations" (Syed Ahmed in Lucknow) "Muslim nation is of the blood of those who made not only Arabia, but Asia and Europe, to tremble" (Syed Ahmed in Lucknow) In 1887 Congress session, Muslim President of Congress Badruddin Tayyabji asked Syed Ahmed to not stop Muslims from joining Congress, he (Syed Ahmed) clearly states "Hindus and Muslims are two nations with nothing in common"

[@maheshsawant91]

प्रवीण जी, ये गधे ना सुनेंगे, ना समझेंगे, पूरा धीम्मी जमावड़ा है यहां...

[@maheshsawant91]

हमे अपनी ऊर्जा और समय ऐसे गधों को समझाने मे व्यर्थ नहीं करना चाहिए, अकल के दरवाजे पूरे बंद करके बैठे है, ना शत्रुबोध ना इतिहास से सीख पा रहे है...सामने दिख रहा है, घट रहा है, लेकिन ये नही मानेंगे जो खुद डूबने और कटने के लिए तैयार बैठे है, उनके पीछे अपनी ऊर्जा व्यर्थ नहीं करनी चाहिए...

[@praveendixit.parambhattaraka]

@महेश जी... ये ना मानेंगे ना इनको मनवाने की इक्षा है। जो सच में जानना चाहते हैं उनको बताना हम सब का प्रथम उद्देश्य होना चाहिए। how these evil people lie through their teeth. I think if even 10 visitors would search these historically established fact against the lie of Ram Puniyani, the hard work is nothing.

[@maheshsawant91]

@@praveendixit.parambhattaraka शायद समय की मांग कुछ और है अब...और समय की कमी भी है..समविचारी साथ जोडिए..its an absolutely wastage to think about this dimmi class...

[@shreyanshvarma6134]

गिद्ध के शक्ल वाले व्यक्ति की पोल खोल दी आपने 🙏

[@nayyariqbal3207]

Jinnah and other Muslim leaders at first joined Indian Congress and worked for libration of a united India .but Hindu majority did not showed generosity while making interim government . Muslim leaders became disgusted and gradually moved away from the idea of united India. Partition caused tremendous loss of life and property and divided ultimately Muslim nation in three parts .

[@krishnavishwakarma4754]

Its nowhere hindu or Muslim responsible for partition, it was elite class ruling that time were responsible , with vested interests of keep on remaining ruling class...

[@musharrafsulemani]

Yes,, Indian section of history and feeling of alienation of muslim is exactly documented,, at that time congress joined hindu mahaasabha and became religious fanatic even much more than BJP of today... ❤all from 🇮🇳India... It is true congress and RSS are the two major force of partition

[@AdilKhan-lj3ci]

@@krishnavishwakarma4754 elite class structured through caste responsible all. Gandhi wanted Brahman to become the first prime minister of India, in 1938 he unnecessarily favored Nehru over netaji. Gandhi did a lot of mistakes during colonial period of struggles.he was blindly favored due ignorance masses of Indian society.this was a golden chance for British to delay freedom of India. Gandhi from Africa by British was to create a boundary line against Jinnah,against sarojini naidu. Nehru was nothing good for...,his position was through favoritism is known fact from understanding between motilal and Nehru...how could Muslim of India can ever thing of dividing India where principality of Islam is rooted in " Tauheed"??? In politics Islam is a unifying spirit that were done mughlai over the subcontinent.maybe some muslims from Hindus background unconsciously might have divisiveness as they well aware of ugly structure of Hindu societies...

[@hiralalpandey3963]

Don't remember yogendra Prasad mandal?

[@hiralalpandey3963]

@@krishnavishwakarma4754 thanks, muslim zamindars promoted jinnah for division because they knew that policy of congress was abolition of zamindaris.they wanted to be established in newly created country Pakistan where he would obtain compensation.common Muslims were deprived of two nation theory.for this purpose intensity of Direct action was held by jinnah as an infallible weapon.

[@SantoshJha-dd8ny]

पुनियानी जी, दो राष्ट्रों का सिद्धांत सर सैय्यद अहमद की देन है।

[@sheikhlukman4364]

भारत का बटवारा मेरे ज्ञान से हिन्दू वादी लोगों ने किया कयो कि अगर ऐसा नहीं होता तो शायद सदन में आधे सदस्य मुस्लिम होते

[@MayankKumar-ge7tb]

Agar aisa hota to Bharat ek secular desh nahi hota. Aur itne saare muslims yaha nahi rah rahe hote

[@sudhakarshukla9513]

Pakistan and Bangladesh mein kitne hindu sadasya hain

[@majharshaikh6906]

Bahut dhanyawad sir aap dono ka

[@Rainbow-cs1xx]

I'm a Pakistani watching this program for the first time, I must admit I'm very impressed by these Gentlemen's Impartial, Balanced and Intellectual analysis of the circumstances surrounding the Partition of India.

[@AjmalKhan-kl5kj]

Pakistan aaj kehan hai bhaai Pakistan naa hota two aaj Bharat mai Muslims majority hoti

[@bilalbhutta6881]

@@AjmalKhan-kl5kj not true.. It would have been 30 to 35% of India not majority. Hindus would still be majority with 65%.

[@AjmalKhan-kl5kj]

@@bilalbhutta6881 i am not wrong but you tell me ware is Pakistan today because bangal is Ander India

[@Muhammadimran-lq5uc]

Ji muslim taqreeban 65 cror hoti bangladesh 17 pak 23 indian muslims jo aaj wahaa reh rhy hn kul mila kr

[@AjmalKhan-kl5kj]

@@Muhammadimran-lq5uc arrai bhaai India me kitne Muslims hain tum ko malum hai tum tow bangaladesh ka figure bhi kamm ker kai batai

[@goldstar4225]

सत्य वचन सुनकर मुझे बहुत अच्छा लगा और सुन कर मैं संतूष हैं सत्य को सलाम जय हिन्द

[@ameeksingh4130]

देश के विभाजन का सबसे ज्यादा और बहुत बड़ा नुक़सान व दर्द पंजाब और ख़ासकर सिख समुदाय को झेलना पड़ा 😢

[@ananddasmanikpuri3011]

आदरणीय मुकेश जी, सुनने में आता है कि आरएसएस ने कभी भी आज़ादी की लड़ाई में भाग नहीं लिया था, कृपया इस पर भी वीडियो बना देते।

[@ss-bu3xb]

Sardar patel ne RSS par ban lagaya tha..

[@ahmadkhalid1751]

Today time proved that jinnah was absolutely right.

[@akhlaqurrehman9523]

Sarejahan se achcha Hindusthan hamara . C. A.Rehman.

[@ashishmohmmad6035]

Sc kha h apne hajrat

[@ghulammahboob4343]

Yes.

[@homosapienssapiens4848]

Muslim League= Islamic RSS

[@HigherCastekPitaPakistani]

@@akhlaqurrehman9523 ye Pakistan k national Poet Alama Iqbal ki poetry ha

[@akhtarm470113]

प्रश्न ये है कि भारत में इतने अधिक मुसलमान कैसे बढ गये कि उनहोंने एक नया राष्ट्र बना लिया मुगल तो केवल 1500 ही आए थे इतने अधिक धर्म परिवर्तित के क्या कारण थे क्या इसके पीछे वर्ण व्यवस्था मूल कारण था

[@itfoss]

दोनो कारण है।

[@AneesAhmad-fv9bq]

Hindu to bahut badi tadad mein Aaj bhi Musalman ho rahe hain rok

[@Creator-kr2sx]

हिंदुस्तान में हिन्दू majority होने के बाद भी मुस्लिम ko हिन्दुओ से जियदा facilities मिलता है। जबकि मुस्लिम majority देश पाकिस्तान me ऐसा क्यो नहीं होता हैं??

[@spectrum8085]

Dear Sir, You forgot to mention Mr. M.K. Gandhi's slogan of the establishment of "Ram Rajya" which made Jinnah suspicious rightly, because he was truly a patriot and secular person. So we can't blame Jinnah.

[@Arun-fg2bu]

1857 विद्रोह में सिखों और राजपुतो ने भाग नही लिया

[@fahadali-jd8fo]

Ye sawal hai??

[@Arun-fg2bu]

@@fahadali-jd8foआखिर में ? दीख रहा है क्या ?

[@Arun-fg2bu]

@@fahadali-jd8fo common sense is not so common

[@ajitwalia3442]

You forget, there was great Sikh empire just 10 years before this mutiny and every body who took part in this mutiny helped British to crush Sikhs kingdom

[@ismailabdullah8865]

Namaskar mukeshji, thank you very much for your excellent episode, appreciated

[@aquariusa2421]

Namashkar ka meaning ap jante hain Ismail ji? It means ap apna sar jhuka rahe hain unke samne. Aur islam to sar jhukane ko sirf Allah ke liye kahta hai.

[@hasansiddiqui5793]

Thanks a lot Sir, for enlighten us about the scenario of partition. I am highly thankful to you & Dr. Puniyani. 🙏🌷🌷

[@explorewithkriti8374]

Thankful for what? Bcos they have give clean chit to Jinnah & don't consider him as a villain in their conversation.

[@shafirahaman]

@@explorewithkriti8374 Facts in the Media. RSS is the culprits with British and Manu waadi. Then RSS Terrorist Godse killed Mahatma Gandhi ji.

[@jayaziz3785]

A very candid pragmatic non biase and un prejudicious debate in enlightening a fair analysis lndo Pak, Hindu muslim controversy. Such debates are crucial in educating the misguided populistic ideologies that ferment disharmony in equality a stability and peace. Great contribution by the hosts of this program.

[@ahmedreza2985]

professor Ram punyani...Apke knowledge ko salam....Ap jaise knowlegable and great analyst bahut kam hain bharat mein....

[@kkrishna1718]

Whoever is responsible for partition was a visionary, whoever is responsible for violence was evil.

[@babarsaleem2861]

The partition of India was a plan of Britisher and Jewish lobby and they used hindu leaders and qaud e Azam for this no one among muslims scholars agreed on partition of India riots started from Indian Punjab coz in eastern Punjab Britisher found Muslim majority and road for Kashmir was from there so this was the reason the Hindus give bribes to vice Roy mount baton and give him a big post in India and mount baton changed the border to give excess to Kashmir form Punjab

[@anjaneyagaming295]

@@babarsaleem2861 riots started in Calcutta ( direct action day )

[@manishbodhi5461]

@@babarsaleem2861 हम में

[@arsalanmirza3411]

@@babarsaleem2861 FAKE NEWS 🗞

[@krishnaravnang8259]

Bayvate ka jimmedar jina tha . Aur phir desh todne ke liye jihadi mile prayas kartahr hai. Ram puniyani ki mansikta gandhi ki tarah muslmano ke baare me soft corner rakhta hai.

[@nitishkumar6623]

Us jamane ke log kam padhe the lekin desh ki unity ko phachante thai. Hindu Muslim Christian Sikh unity jindabad. 🙏🙏

[@fazalanwer5236]

Indeed, RSS Ideology still prevails frequently in India now days which give insecurity to minorities.

[@akhilmehta7875]

Some scoff at the idea of the shifting and exchange of population. But those who scoff can hardly be aware of the complications, which a minority problem gives rise to and the failures attendant upon almost all the efforts made to protect them. The constitutions of the post-war states, as well as of the older states in Europe which had a minority problem, proceeded on the assumption that constitutional safeguards for minorities should suffice for their protection and so the constitutions of most of the new states with majorities and minorities were studded with long lists of fundamental rights and safeguards to see that they were not violated by the majorities. What was the experience ? Experience showed that safeguards did not save the minorities. Experience showed that even a ruthless war on the minorities did not solve the problem. The states then agreed that the best way to solve it was for each to exchange its alien minorities within its border, for its own which was without its border, with a view to bring about homogeneous States. This is what happened in Turky, Greece and Bulgaria. Those, who scoff at the idea of transfer of population, will do well to study the history of the minority problem, as it arose between Turky, Greece and Bulgaria. If they do, they will find that these countries found that the only effective way of solving the minorities problem lay in exchange of population. The task undertaken by the three countries was by no means a minor operation. It involved the transfer of some 20 million people from one habitat to another. But undaunted, the three shouldered the task and carried it to a successful end because they felt that the considerations of communal peace must outweigh every other consideration. That the transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace is beyond doubt. If that is so, there is no reason why the Hindus and the Muslims should keep on trading in safeguards which have proved so unsafe. If small countries, with limited resources like Greece, Turkey and Bulgaria, were capable of such an undertaking, there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by Indians. After all, the population involved is inconsiderable and because some obstacles require to be removed, it would be the height of folly to give up so sure a way to communal peace. There is one point of criticism to which no reference has been made so far. As it is likely to be urged, I propose to deal with it here. It is sure to be asked, how will Pakistan affect the position of the Muslims that will be left in Hindustan ? The question is natural because the scheme of Pakistan does seem to concern itself with the Muslim majorities who do not need protection arid abandons the Muslim minorities who do. But the point is : who can raise it ? Surely not the Hindus. Only the Muslims of Pakistan or the Muslims of Hindustan can raise it. The question was put to Mr. Rehmat Ali, the protagonist of Pakistan and this is the answer given by him :- "How will it affect the position of the forty five million Muslims in Hindustan proper ? " The truth is that in this struggle their thought has been more than a wrench to me. They are the flesh of our flesh and the soul of our soul. We can never forget them ; nor they, us. Their present position and future security is, and shall ever be, a mailer of great importance to us. As things are at present, Pakistan will not adversely affect their position in Hindustan. On the basis of population (one Muslim to four Hindus), they will still be entitled to the same representation in legislative as well as administrative fields which they possess now. As to the future, the only effective guarantee we can offer is that of reciprocity, and, therefore, we solemnly undertake to give all those safeguards to non-Muslim minorities in Pakistan which will be conceded to our Muslim minority in Hindustan. " But what sustains us most is the fact that they know we are proclaiming Pakistan in the highest interest of the’ Millet’. It is as much theirs as it is ours. While for us it is a national citadel, for them it will ever be a moral anchor. So long as the anchor holds, everything is or can be made safe. But once it gives way, all will be lost ". The answer given by the Muslims of Hindustan is equally clear. They say, " We are not weakened by the separation of Muslims into Pakistan and Hindustan. We are better protected by the existence of separate Islamic States on the Eastern and Western borders of Hindustan than we are by their submersion in Hindustan. " Who can say that they are wrong ? Has it not been shown that Germany as an outside state was better able to protect the Sudeten Germans in Czechoslovakia than the Sudetens were able to do themselves ? 41[f.41] Be that as it may, the question does not concern the Hindus. The question that concerns the Hindus is : How far does the creation of Pakistan remove the communal question from Hindustan ? That is a very legitimate question and must be considered. It must be admitted that by the creation of Pakistan, Hindustan is not freed of the communal question. While Pakistan can be made a homogeneous state by redrawing its boundaries, Hindustan must remain a composite state. The Musalmans are scattered all over Hindustan-though they are mostly congregated in towns-and no ingenuity in the matter of redrawing of boundaries can make it homogeneous. The only way to make Hindustan homogeneous is to arrange for exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan......BR AMBEDKAR IN PAKISTAN AND PARTTION OF INDIA

[@marufhossain1356]

Population transfer proposal was given to Nehru by Liaquat Ali khan but it was rejected by Nehru coz he knew that wud not solve the problems, the Communal Problem wud transform into Severe CASTE PROBLEM which will end up in dissolution of the nation,he knew very well, much before Prof Huntington, that you need a REAL or IMAGINARY ENEMY to keep yourself "Protected"! The mass conversion from Lower Caste had also a Catalytic effect on Partition, the Population growth of Ms in 50 years (from 1st Census 1871 to 6th 1921) in Bengal created an alarm in upper caste Association (Congress),they were thinking of getting rid of the Ms permanently so that they cud Rule over the LC people forever that's why they didn't agree with Cabinet Mission Proposals of keeping only 4 Departments Finance, Communication, Foreign Affairs n Defence with the Central Government n rest be given to the States, hence all chances of keeping the country United failed Even we see today the most Powerful country USA has such an arrangement of keeping those 4 Most important Departments with the Central Government n rest are given to States

[@arjunyaduvanshi6417]

Fazal Anwar toh Bhai afghanastin Chala ja waha Allah Ka kannon shariya laagu ho chuka hai 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

[@parveshbhardwaj9320]

Pakistan ke hindu jo wahan ke musalmano ne khatam kar diye uske baare mai kuch bol

[@savethenation7987]

@@akhilmehta7875 Who will read so much and what way it will benefit India and its unity

[@MunirAalam-nr9jn]

मुकेश कुमार जी नमस्कार 🎉😂❤

[@zaibunisa1835]

It is a very best debate.. A number of points to be noted as i am the student of "Pakistan Studies".. But for me, the little problem is Pure Hindi language. Mujhy baat samjh mai arahi hai but hindi k kuch mushkil words ki waja se mai baat ki gehrai mai uthar nahi pai. Baqi a very informative debate. Thank you so much

[@shaikmeeran8905]

Mukesh kumar ji & ram punyani ji aazadi ki 75sal anvesary mubarek good morning I la ke both

[@niansh]

Superb discussion. Listening to Ram Sir is always a great joy. Keep it up. It would be great if you can create more episodes on Jinnah's role in Partition by inviting other eminent historians also, just to add different thoughts and perspectives. And same for each of your next subjects like.. Nehru's role, Patel's role etc. This will give completeness to the subject.

[@ujjawalmathur8205]

7

[@md.salmanali4463]

0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0l0ll0l0l0l0l0lll0ll0l0llll0lll0l0ll00l0ll0l0llllll0l0lll0ll0ll0lpl0ll0l0llllllllllll0llllllllllllllllllll0lllll0llllllllplllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

[@md.salmanali4463]

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000

[@prakashchandra9581]

@@ujjawalmathur8205 and

[@abdurrasheed7347]

Jinnah advocated the Muslim interests & envisioned what would happen to Muslims after independence. If Jinnah was wrong, the recent happenings in India reveals?

[@Bombay0286]

It’s always a pleasure to hear from Ram sir

[@ramlakhansingh4920]

Old.

[@mdshahnawaz4892]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kH2qqHhtiNSnnKOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/oom6nIyulMqomcWcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rofJeK2Am7xrpqecttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2mkn6J8pLWkhJacttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3jNfKV_odWLh8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3_IgoSva6xgjNGcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmraqX-KYp6meq-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZvMl4maZcprqructtps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5izf4mEmJx7r6ucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqHNiXmubMeArK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppqmfGOwqM6ZY6Octtps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/m56UcouXl6amf9mcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipeqeHp-jbR-sK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGTWin9voaioq9Gcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmG3qGaZZ8h3gZqcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rp7Qk2x9r7t4g5qcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIfViZupj76ZY8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqHNiXmubMeArK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/poGUiompgaxrr8mcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/opOyppKQg7SCrpacttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4i9q42af6lokK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKGYoYxmfNdqrrOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2rOY4Zsp62VepKcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/aKvEf2qIocuBb8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4Ckpq2or917hJqcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/omjHhYaDj9iigLucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqfEc35ooK9pa6ucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJavoomioJ2qZqOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rofUo3trf895d6s

[@shantaramholey6411]

अत्यन्त सुंदर, सत्य, इतिहास राम पुनियानी जी ने ब तया है.गांधी और नेहरू ये विभाजन के दोषी नहीं, उसके लिये मुकेशकुमार जी को दुनिया का प्राचीन और अर्वाचीन इतिहास पंढ ना होगा.

[@shahimpinjarisir756]

दुर्भाग्य की बात है आज भी सच्चाई को धर्म के आळसही देख रहे पुणीयाजी ने बहुत अच्छी बात कही हमारा दृष्टिकोन बदलला चाहिये

[@ghulammustapha8245]

Well done, sir 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰 really very informative What Mr jinah perceived at that time regarding Muslims of India, is proved now, regarding the treatment of the minorities in India

[@kartiknaidu6564942]

Sorry to say bro but your country is worse ...in the world ....degrading day by day ..... completely handed your country to chaina ...plase first make your country good ..then teach us will listen ...here people lives better life then your people

[@Peaceful_World130]

Non muslim minority are not in good condition in Pakistan so exchange of population is good solution

[@Emperor-of-india-1707]

@@kartiknaidu6564942 you are right, one day our country will be a terror free great country

[@musharrafsulemani]

@@Peaceful_World130 they are 1.6% during independence and also today in West Pakistan... And some migrated to India, and some became muslim

[@sheheryarfirangimahal1234]

With lies, fabrications, half-truths ... these two gentlemen try to paper over Congress criminal negligence, incompetence, cimmunal thinking (particularly Sardar Patel) - and its part (particularly Nehru) leading to partition of Bharat.

[@reshu7860]

Nice series 👏👏... very good idea to invite professor...that idea is good to invite professors on different topics...its like talking intellectual 👍

[@mohammadazeembarqaati2356]

Sir godse ne mahatma Gandhi ko kyo mra is pr ek video banaye

[@SureshKumar-wv7wm]

भाई लोग, मुस्लिमों को अगर इतना ही डर होता तो एक भी मुसलमान आज भारत में नहीं होता। काश्मीर से पंडित नहीं भागा होता, पाकिस्तान में हिन्दू इतना कम नहीं हुआ होता। आप कौन सी दिशा में बहस को ले जा रहे हो समझ से परे है।

[@subrataroy1129]

If the partition was happened on the basis of religion only then it should have been on basis of exchange of Hindus and Muslims after partition. This has been indicated non other than Dr. Ambedkar.

[@devpr0nerd631]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 excellent work 🙏

[@kshitijpandey7487]

Sir, I have two questions here 1) We study that the Two Nation Theory was first given by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in 1876 way before VD Savarkar who gave in 1937. Please clarify on this issue. Reference at 16:10 and 27:15 . 2) What was BR Ambedkar's stand on this issue and what was his thought on Hindu Muslim unity and what was his thought on different religions as such? 3) On what basis was Jinnah fighting for a separate nation if he was secular and he did not have any personal interest of becoming PM and all? PS- Years might not be 100% correct but I hope the range is somewhat similar.

[@ShahbazKhan-qh6xh]

q

[@rehanamian904]

On what basis Jinnah wanted a separate entity ? In one line : your despicable Caste System. Which is still very much alive and kicking.

[@artsgeneration8208]

@@rehanamian904 The prejudice behavior.

[@rehanamian904]

@@artsgeneration8208 - PREJUDICE ? You guys excercise prejudice against Dalits your fellow Hindus of low caste so to speak. And it is getting worst under Modi.

[@trshuk]

@@rehanamian904 India had 3 low caste presidents and few Muslims and there are reservation laws to help promote progress low caste people and its changing in a positive way.

[@mrbahdur9522]

देश का बटवारा आरएसएस के एजेंडे में था क्योंकि देश में बहूमत बना कर शासन कर सके और लूट सके

[@abhishek_singh9]

Haan...Aur Iran se Paarsi, Arab se Jews, Afghanistan/Pakistan /Bangladesh se Buddhists- Hindus,.. Aur Kashmir se kashmiri Pandit bhi RSS Ke Sanghiyon ki wajah se gayab ho gaye. 😩😭😭😭

[@statuschannel9651]

Jinnah is peace keeper😀😀😀

[@sumaiyanoor6928]

I came here for Dr. Ram Puniyani because he is one of those Indians who I respect for his accurate and deep knowledge of history. Wish more Indians can learn from Dr. Ram what it means to be Indian and a real Hindu. Would also like to give credit to the host for this series. Quaid-e-Azam (Jinnah) always wanted a united India (Hindu and Muslims living together) and independence from Britishers because he was secular himself. But he changed his view point later on (when he joined Muslim League) because of his realization of Hindutva mindset of RSS and Sangh Parivar. So Mr. Jinnah changed his mind deliberately based on critical analysis of the situation and his vision. BJP, RSS and Sangh Parivar today in India proved each word of Mr. Jinnah correct. Great conversation and mostly accurate historically.

[@jantawarriors4719]

Love you❤❤

[@er.abhisheksingh775]

Jinnah ka grandfather Hindu tha. Usko gaw walo ne nikal diya tha.

[@AmanSingh-gg3bk]

Dr. Mukesh you are right Gandhi & Nehru not ready to give more to Minorities they more responsible for Partition of India Britishers tried hard to stop Partition if you read or Listen right people you will come to know

[@2006raghav]

Dr. Ram puniya ji, I am usually watching your videos and I have few questions for you. 1.current news of Afganistan raised a big question that why British could not rule that country where as India was under British rule for 250 years. 2. It's very stringent that people used to say that B. rule has shaped india as we see i today. Could you pls explain what was india before Bristish in prospect of economic aspects (with facts) not landscape or religious. 3. It is very commonly known that after 15TH century, Akbar was one who was doing treaties between sates and kings to make his gaint empire. So at that time what was ground facts of economy, currency, judiciary as compared to today's constitutional rights.

[@unifaqir]

What constitutional rights? Minorities in India has no rights.

[@md.alamgirsalfi6630]

सही फ़रमाया है

[@dipakbose2677]

@@unifaqir They have special rights which we Hindus do not have. It seems that you are a Pakistani and ignorant about Indian laws.

[@lightansarul]

Your discussion has half true and half constructed by your self. Please read the book of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad the complete portion of which was published after 30 years expiry, where he indicated that it was Nehru’s greatest political blunder that he commented before the News Reporters that the decision of the cabinet mission may be changed later on by majority vote. For this reason Jinnah became very much adamant for the demand of Pakistan. This was also disclosed in book of Jashwant Singh as well as Leonard Mosley.

[@lightansarul]

I wanted to mean 30 years after the death of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad the last portion of the book India Wins Freedom was published and in that book he admitted that Nehru’s comment was the political blunder for which India was divided. Moreover Hindu leaders like Sarder Patel was were very much eager to have independence at any cost even at the cost of dividing India.

[@stargazing2207]

Lots and lots of respect for bringing out the truth abt partition to many of us ,who either have half knowledge or wrong information regarding the partition.

[@piyushyadav4212]

15000 10000 साल पुराना प्राचीन मंदिर ऐसा मंदिर जो कहीं संसार में नहीं हैं भारत जैसे देश में , किसने तोड़ा क्यों तोड़ा था , बताइए

[@RanjiniDavidson]

In these days of fear and darkness Dr Mukesh Kumar Ji is like a "Beacon of Bright Light" by bringing Great Men who enlighten the historical facts of our Great Country.Thank you very much Sir .

[@sadafhashmi4131]

Jinnah was a brilliant leader. He foresaw that once a majority with government, Hindus would bring out their innate hatred against other communities. Now we suffer Hindu fascism on an almost daily basis.

[@VTVT007]

Ha ha what a comedy , at least you are there to comment , in your majority nations you didn't left any minority to write the comments also the ideology you support is far more dangerous than that . Look at Afghanistan , Pakistan Iran Iraq no minority left Shame on your ideology

[@MS-xk6wz]

@@VTVT007 Ab kya comment bhi nhi krne dow gai Han planning to whi hai waise Aur l d bhkt jhoot mat phela which country is 100% muslim even Arab still have polytheist and christian residents although it is majority muslim since beginning

[@sudhakarshukla9513]

@@MS-xk6wz arab mein kitne church hain

[@MS-xk6wz]

@@sudhakarshukla9513 I have not counted but yes estd.christians pop. 10 to 15 million excluding coptic christians and there are mandirs as well for idol worshippers

[@Peaceful_World130]

First talk about Islamic extremism and fascism in Pakistan that why minority are vanishing in Pakistan you people declare that country as Islamic which is against minority

[@glowellconsumer8359]

M K Gandhi laid the foundation for partition in 1921 itself. He was silent in 1946-47

[@farzandali5006]

When Cogress agreed for the partition KHAN ABDUL GHAFAR KHAN told GANDHI "You have betrayed me and thrown me to the wolves

[@shahinabano3956]

Sorry puniya ji, very much disappointed by your disrespectful thoughts regarding Islam. I am a proud indian muslim, follow Islamic teachings, perform 5 times prayer, consider alcohol and pig meat as haram, working as a doctor in a reputed hospital, treating my alling indian brother and sisters and earning 3lakhs per month, will you still call me a backward muslim??? and britishers a forward community?????

[@Top10collection]

Are baba wo kaha disrespect kiye islam ko... Aaj aap bhi india me hi ho na and full freedom k saath rah rhe hona and than thoda samjho k maj political issues k wajah se religion ko use kia jo galat tha and isse aapas me nafrat faile so.. No doubt aap ko ARTICLE 15 of our constitution full aazadi deti h k aap koi sa mazab apne marzi se chun and follow karskte h.. But yaha puniya ji ko dobara sune

[@moin20505]

You are medical doctor ,but still you believe old islamic believe ,you still believe seven sky , earth is flat, sun round the earth ,star is fall down in judgement day,women has less knowledge compare to men , one male witness equal to two women withness. You born india & become doctor in india ,what about other islamic countries in the world ? Woman are not lucky like you ? They don't even get voting rights , they don't even out for free roaming with a muhalim or male companion. Then you know the real islamic teaching. Only as democratic country give to woman right.

[@shahinabano3956]

@@moin20505 dear brother read Qur'an you will get the answer of all your question.

[@moin20505]

@@shahinabano3956 ,Dear sister , I have read all quran , tafser,Hadith, islamic history , for your information , when we grow up any religion ,like our mind set devloped accordingly, believe what our parents teach us , we never go through our religion book deeply ,we think what ever sucess get our life , they think everything by grace of God ,but they forget their hard work , in twenty 1st century ,we still believe our religion superior to other religions , we hope oneday , all human beings become universal , love ,peace harmony among the people .

[@mdshahnawaz4892]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kH2qqHhtiNSnnKOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/oom6nIyulMqomcWcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rofJeK2Am7xrpqecttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2mkn6J8pLWkhJacttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3jNfKV_odWLh8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3_IgoSva6xgjNGcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmraqX-KYp6meq-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZvMl4maZcprqructtps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5izf4mEmJx7r6ucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqHNiXmubMeArK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppqmfGOwqM6ZY6Octtps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/m56UcouXl6amf9mcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipeqeHp-jbR-sK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGTWin9voaioq9Gcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmG3qGaZZ8h3gZqcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rp7Qk2x9r7t4g5qcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIfViZupj76ZY8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqHNiXmubMeArK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/poGUiompgaxrr8mcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/opOyppKQg7SCrpacttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4i9q42af6lokK-cttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKGYoYxmfNdqrrOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2rOY4Zsp62VepKcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/aKvEf2qIocuBb8Wcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4Ckpq2or917hJqcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/omjHhYaDj9iigLucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqfEc35ooK9pa6ucttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJavoomioJ2qZqOcttps://kzbin.info/www/bejne/rofUo3trf895d6s

[@anisshah5305]

Good subject,👍ki jankari 🙏

[@matloobrab6128]

हमारे भारत मै कुछ मुट्ठी भर सनकी और देशद्रोही पिशाच हैं जो देश को फलता फूलता देखना नहीं चाहते । --::::::--- जय छात्र,जय किसान, जय संविधान, जय भारत।

[@SABRASBSP3023]

All programs of the chenal are interesting, informative and useful. A request: volume of the anchor and the guest speakers are sometimes different. Hence volume is to be adjusted frequently particularly listening on low volume. Please do needful for equal volume of both.

[@shyamasava1746]

Really very informative to understand the fact

[@anilgauba7964]

Sir syed ahmed was the first person who gave the theory of two nation theory.

[@liyaqatsiddiqui7936]

Total wrong

[@anilgauba7964]

@@liyaqatsiddiqui7936 please study some history books.

[@liyaqatsiddiqui7936]

@@anilgauba7964 From which book you gave this information sir. Two nation theory is given by sawarkar first time. Word pakistan is given by Rahmat Ali in 1930 first time.

[@anilgauba7964]

@@liyaqatsiddiqui7936 check Patna speech of Sir syed on Google.

[@shaileshkumar4423]

भारत का बंटवारा नेताओ की लड़ाई ही थी और आज भी यही हो रहा है

[@davidabraham3438]

Prof. Dr. Puniyani jee is very objective. It is a pleasure listening to and learning from Prof. Dr. Puniyani jee. Thank you.

[@ambartyagi]

Sir, you both are very learned but I feel your questions are very biased. Many questions should have counter questions, would you be willing to discuss on a broader platform?

[@kartiknaidu6564942]

They are trying making fool of us

[@kashmirbains5568]

India partition time ,What was the role of Sikh leaders please explain next interview .Thank you.

[@matloobrab6128]

यह डर, जो मुसलमानों को द्वितीय दर्जे का नागरिक बनाकर रखने का, अब सच दिखाता नज़र आ रहा है। अब यह जिन्ना की भविष्यवाणी सच होता नज़र आ रहा है। --::::--- जय किसान, जय छात्र, जय संविधान, जय भारत।

[@dhananjaysingh838]

इतनी तरफदारी जिन्ना की मत करो।तुम जैसे लोग इस देश में सांस कैसे लेते हो।

[@mohammedalikhanqadri353]

Dikhane ka bahut bahut shukriya.

[@dpsharma8523]

Mukesh ji aapka bahut bahut dhanyvad Jo aapane Charcha kare aur Sahi Satya nikal kar rakha Sidhi Ram puniyani Ji Ne

[@HumanitiToAll]

No doubt Professor Ram Punyani is a ocean of historical knowledge. Thanks both of you to sharing million dollars analysis.

[@rxtopbike3051]

ALOT OF THANKS FOR INCREASING KNOWLEDGE

[@bollywoodmoods.byalondoner948]

Real Intellectuals these two Gentlemen are... What a best way to narrate the facts of United India....Hats off to both Mr Punyani and Dr Mukesh..... Long live you and your excellent work.

[@abdulquaiyum9165]

bht khoob apne history ke aayina ko hum indian ko dikhaya h

[@afaqahmed1576]

sir independence was ideologically right because look present situation of india against minorities are tortured.

[@statuschannel9651]

What in Afghanistan ,Pakistan Bangladesh where temple destroy, force conversation You should tell that also

[@MayankKumar-ge7tb]

Yes all muslims should have migrated to Pakistan.

[@159arjun]

Why Muslims are being butchered Pakistan even after partition and there is all round poverty in Pakistan, poverty in financial matter, poverty education, poverty in industrialisation, poverty medical facilities, poverty road and train transport, above all poverty in loss of human respecting Pakistan.

[@usmanbinaffan8405]

@@159arjun lol brother first get out from dreamy Bollywood world..

[@Sehrawat_legal002]

57 countries hai kahi bhi ja,,,,,,kam se kam torture se to bachega,,,, non muslim ki sochi hai kabhi tere islamic country me kya hota hoga,,,,, torture hota to 25 crore nahi hote ,,,,,jaise tum log nafrat karte ho usse lakh guna nafrat hone lgi hai tum लोगों से अब भारत में

[@hariomdahiya6258]

excellent Sir

[@narendrakumarsharma4054]

Jinna was lawyer who by fraud captured Balochistan which was independent Country

[@abdulnaeemansari4333]

दो मुस्लिम कमेटियों,मुस्लिम लीग और मजलिसे एहरार में आपस में वोटिंग क्यों हुई? इस वोटिंग का असर भारत की राजनीति पर क्या पड़ा?

[@rishimathur4165]

Sir Syed Ahmed, the founder of Aligarh University had put forward the theory of 2 nations way before in one of his speeches most probably in 1898.

[@simplyjitendra9250]

Thanks Dr Mukesh sir and Dr Puniani sir

[@akrammalik1381]

I must congratulate you for presenting a balanced view about Jinnah and was trying, on the one hand to get independence from Britain as one nation and on the other, he was endeavouring to protect the sizeable minority of Muslims living in the subcontinent. Everyone will agree, that Jinnah was not a fundamentalist, far from it and as it has been pointed out, by your guest, that now that Pakistan has been achieved, religion will have no part in it. If I may be so bold, and refer you and your very knowledgeable guest, to the incident, which has been reported by Stanley Wolpert in his book "Shameful Flight". On page 141, "Bengal's total population at this time was some 60 million, most of whom were Muslims, though over 24 million Hindus dominated the Western region Suhrawardy hoped to lead Bengal to independent Dominion statehood, urging Governor Burrows and Mountbatten to help him create an undivided Bangla Desh,... Two weeks later, Mountbatten asked Jinnah what he thought of Suhrawardy's proposal to create a separate server and Bengal, expecting him to be shocked at his Muslim League lieutentant "treachery". Much to Mountbatten's surprise, Jinnah calmly replied, "I should be delighted."..... "Maryville, met with Nehru on May 27 and "I asked him how he viewed.. an independent Bengal. He reacted strongly and said there was no chance of the Hindus there agreeing to put themselves under permanent Muslim domination, which was what the proposed agreement really amounted to. He did not, however, rule out the possibility of the whole of Bengal joining up with Hindustan." If I may say so, this clearly shows, that he himself believed in the unity of the country, in the first place, but if not possible, he was willing to United Bengal, to be a separate third sovereign Dominion.

[@bikramsinghmajhail1487]

This is wrong. Jinnah’s image had been presented in a wrong way

[@dadduprasad386]

बहुत शानदार ज्ञानवर्धक जानकारी, अविभाजित भारत में मुस्लिम आबादी कितने प्रतिशत थी ?

[@santoshvyas5833]

नेहरू को बहुमत न मिलने पर भी, सरदार वल्लभ भाई के स्थान पर चयन क्यों किया गया।

[@BharatSharma-qm5vd]

The reason is simple. Narendra Modi was given preference over many stalwarts. Why? The answer to your question lies in the answer of the above question.

[@raghvendrabpl]

They have hidden their identity ,/name .

[@SushilKumar-ub7hs]

Congratulations Sir for new series 👏 🙌 👍 When Baba saheb said if there will be any conflict between my interests and national interest, I will choose national interest .But if the conflict comes between my people's interests and national interests, I will stand with my people. So if we understand closely the so called secular face of #Congress except Nehru ji then it may be a strong cause of communal inclination of Jinnah. Because the so called secular #Congress whose leaders even Gandhi ji strongly believed in Varna system whose darkness is still normal in society. Then we need to do deep Analysis on this . #PunaPact was the example of castiest mindset of Gandhiji .He stood like mountain against the rights of #SC_ST.

[@adityabehera1361]

Gandhi never believed the Varna system. He did his best to remove untouchability. He ate with so called untouchable people. He also tried to unite Hindu and Muslim. You better study his story first.

[@ImranHussain-vm2sr]

Sach bolnewala Mahan itihaskar ...❤️ U

[@iqbalurrahman6316]

जिन्नाह साहब कांग्रेस की अंदरूनी राजनीतिक सच्चाई को समझ रहे थे जिसकी सच्चाई आज हम सब देख रहे हैं।

[@sharifahmedbarbhuiya4959]

Had grouping system been accepted ,there would have been no partition .Jinnah accepted it but Gandiji rejected it .Jinnah was a very secular person .

[@jwala.d6156]

Shut up he is just like Modi who used religion in politics. It was only Nehru who is actually India’s hero. I heard it from a Pakistani historian

[@ghulammahboob4343]

@@jwala.d6156 is this way to express your difference of opinion. Why to shut up him. You should use decent language to express your option. Mr sharif has valid point.such behaviour leads to resentment.

[@jwala.d6156]

@@ghulammahboob4343 shut up is not a bad language. Jinnah was responsible for the attacks in Kolkata and Bombay remember he was a arrogant person. And please don’t call me Sanghi now. In my opinion Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru were the best for an inclusive society.

[@bilalbhutta6881]

@@jwala.d6156 not true.. Mountbatten admitted in 1977 in an interview to BBC that Muhammed Ali jinnah was the finest politician in 21st century especially in indisn subcontinent.

[@Peaceful_World130]

@@bilalbhutta6881 only dr Ambedkar was great leader in subcontinent not Jinnah

[@एबीसीजेड]

नेहरू और गांधी हिन्दू वादी नेता थे,उसके क ई प्रमाण है रिकार्ड में

[@shaikmeeran8905]

Mukesh bhai ram punyani ji kae episode bana ker pesh karea kafee gyan hoga

[@IrshadKhan-bx1ye]

सत्य हिंदी के इतिहास पर अधारीत ऐसे सभी कार्यक्रम को सलाम और पुनिया का भी आभार के आज समय मै जब संप्रधायकता अपने चरम पर है आप जैसे लोग देश के सामने सच रखने का कार्य कर रहै , मुझे खुशी और गर्व है

[@stargazing2207]

Thanks a lot, both of you. 👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@drabulhasandasankop3737]

First we have to study mahatma Jothiba Phule legendary hero of our country so that we will come to know the internal enemy of our country today we are seeing their dominance rule of onslaught at present.

[@LiaqatAli-yu5te]

视频8@6了

[@ashwanipal2308]

Very conceptual people should no the fact it's true that majority emphasis on particular sector of canvass. Nice presentation. Commendable job. Praise worthy.

[@sunildabhade1138]

Ek baat samazme aa rahi hai ke dalito aur pichhado ke upar bahut zulm huye ye ek daur tha jo gujar chuka hai dhire dhire unke dil me chhipi pratishodh ki bhavna, nafrat kam ho jayegi lekin iska matlab ye to nahi ke aap is nafrat ka fayda uthakar etihas ko badal de

[@sarojanikukrety4037]

तथ्यपूर्ण जानकारी देने के लिए आपका धन्यवाद...

[@shuklashukla7283]

Correct Information jab milti hain Toh Soch Positive ho jati hain.. Raam Puniyani ji ko 🙏