Three judges is to much though. That's way to many people responsible for interpreting the law
@misstwinza2 жыл бұрын
This is how all cases should be handled. The majority rules. The fact that sometimes one judge may be in opposition, shows us that not all judges agree with the verdicts of other judges. What if you had to go before one judge and you get the judge who would more than likely not rule in your favor? You'd wish for another trail. But if there was two judges and they were oppressed to each other they would need the opinion of a third. The thirdb judge's decision would then become the tipping scale. Majority rules.
@mistiinseattle2 жыл бұрын
If you think too mant judges then why watch Hot Bench, since this is the entire focus of the show?
@taymisweet6162 жыл бұрын
Why are you watching this then? Its a Bench trial multiple judges...
@VocallyYours32 жыл бұрын
I enjoy these type of judges, each usually have a different idea of a case.
@amberdaniels80372 жыл бұрын
What an interesting show! I love this!
@fjccommish2 жыл бұрын
This show is awful. The judges have 0 personality.
@abhinavjoshi28612 жыл бұрын
Judge Judy is the best
@JesseTalksTruth2 жыл бұрын
I don't hate the concept of the show but the judges do not seem comfortable in front on the cameras at all. I'm not even sure they got this case right. My questioning would have been different.
@burtonm3220 Жыл бұрын
I really don't get what happened here. she gave the requisite number of days of notice and she should get her deposit back (was it because the person coming in was done later - and he thought of that as less than the 60 days?!). given the guy's demeanor I don't think he was trying to scam them. (if he wanted to he might have started claiming all sorts of damages)
@zuritribe4844 Жыл бұрын
HE WRITES BAD CONTRACTS TO CONFUSE PEOPLE I CAN FEEL IT SUPER GLAD SHE SUED