WASM is Awesome! Explained with Examples | Ft Docker

[@lucifer3646]

You deserve fireship level recognition and more than that! Love your videos and keep them coming. Bless pal

[@victorpinasarnault9135]

I love WASM since they launched it!

[@premraj.m]

awesome update.. thanks for cutting edge technology update.

[@sumitdange2507]

Too awesome! learned a great content and test of a new technology! 👏

[@mmpcse]

An Impressive Simple Plain Explanation. Subscribed to your YT!

[@josepepedev]

Keep making those great videos, Byte. They are so enjoyables

[@devcore1]

Excellent video - great visuals, good pacing, I have a much better understanding of wasm now

[@cnkumar20]

WASM for P2P applications will be a pandora box

[@lhard123l]

Why?

[@shefalituteja8896]

Not a tech person but I am loving the edits. Great work man. Can you guide me as a fellow youtuber what tool you are using to edit your videos?

[@M_Novman]

And YouR Awesome!!!!!!!

[@xade8381]

great video, but wasi is better without container

[@beginnerbytes4575]

.wasm should be renamed to .awsm

[@ByteMonk]

haha

[@bluesquare23]

Yeah it kinda feels like you're trying to do a WASM vs Docker comparison. But they're not really competing technologies cause WASM is frontend and Docker is backend. When I'm choosing the technologies to build my app with it's not like I'm going to say 'we could go with WASM or we could go with Docker.' They're just two different things that do different things and aren't really related other than that you could stitch them together. But you could stitch a lot of different pieces of technology together, it doesn't really mean you're going to get anything useful out of doing that.. I don't really know what my point was. Anyways, I did enjoy the video! The comparison just felt a little forced.

[@ByteMonk]

Thanks for your perspective! Here is the comment from founder of Docker. Solomon Hykes. "If WASM+WASI existed in 2008, we wouldn't have needed to created Docker. That's how important it is. Webassembly on the server is the future of computing. A standardized system interface was the missing link. Let's hope WASI is up to the task!" Source: twitter.com/solomonstre/status/1111004913222324225?lang=en While WASM and Docker are not directly competing, they can be used together to create powerful and efficient applications. For example, you could use WASM to deploy a web application to a Docker container. This would give you the benefits of both technologies: the portability and isolation of Docker, and the performance and security of WASM. I think the point you're trying to make is that it's important to choose the right technologies for your specific needs, and that not all technologies are created equal. Just because two technologies can be used together doesn't mean that you should do so. I agree with you that it's important to be mindful of the trade-offs involved when choosing technologies, using WASM and Docker together can give you the benefits of both technologies, but it can also add complexity to your application. Thanks again!

[@xade8381]

Nooo. WASM = front & WASI = back, might have been acceptable, even tho both = Backend