We Live in Cold Times

[@MiguelBaptista1981]

How this video is still up is beyond me. Good job mates.

[@blamasterk]

Shadow banning is more effective than censoring.

[@woodspirit98]

The political global warming alarmists completely refuse to believe the sun has anything to do with temperature, weather or climate.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

No, that's not true.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@Christopher Wallbank No, Allah would not do that.

[@woodspirit98]

Co2 actually releases half it's stored heat back into space.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@woodspirit98 "Co2 actually releases half it's stored heat back into space." [citation needed].

[@Rin-qj7zt]

people who don't understand how to read a graph think that this video is evidence against global warming. i'd tend not to believe the people who don't understand the data they are looking at. jorgen, in the video, understands, and that's why he supports the idea of global warming.

[@robmo6505]

How dare you!!! You only went back 10,000 years, Greta insists it's been warming in her lifetime, I'm sure she knows what she's talking about!!!!

[@woodspirit98]

It's true she's actually seen co2

[@neilmick7746]

Right, 97% of climatologists agree with Greta. But yeah, let's pay attention to what this rando youtube dude says. He has an accent: so he can't be wrong.

[@robmo6505]

@@neilmick7746 Yet another ill informed alarmist. First, there was no 97% concensus, they merely said that humans MAY have some impact on the climate, they certainly didn't say we were causing GW. Secondly, the guy isn't believed because of his accent, he's believed because of the huge amount of research he does and the huge number of facts he uncovers. But if you prefer to believe some ranting school girl, well that says it all.

[@truthseeker8894]

LOL 😂

[@laurengianna9944]

@@robmo6505 Don’t forget she’s a Klaus puppet as well 😂. People are just so brainwashed it’s truly sad.

[@DavidSiegelVision]

An important video everyone should see. Please share.

[@bobdooly3706]

The new ice age began in 2017

[@kneuzen]

No it is not at all. The research and publications behind it and connected to it as follow up as well as the body of evidence is much more important for the scientifical relevance.

[@HO-jp1by]

What does the video say?

[@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307]

@@bobdooly3706 Really is that why 9 or 10 hottest years have bene in the last decade? LOL On the graph what year is the far right hand side? BET YOU DONT KNOW!

[@bobdooly3706]

@@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 , the world has been getting colder since 2017 with heavier snow falls across Europe , America and Arabia.

[@bobdooly3706]

My friend lives in NUUK , Greenland and says the ice shelves have not changed . These videos are made in Summer when ice melts but freezes in Winter.

[@iliketoeat]

How does your friend account for the polar ice melt over time? We’re seeing Arctic sea ice melting at roughly 13% per decade.

[@bobdooly3706]

@@iliketoeat , you are not seeing anything because you dont live in Greenland. My friends do , they were born in Greenland.

[@Aanthanur]

you are a liar

[@bobdooly3706]

@@Aanthanur , you are gullible. The world is getting colder and entering an Ice Age. Dont you read the news regarding record low temperatures in America, Canada and Europe ?

[@Aanthanur]

@@bobdooly3706 dude, i just had new years eve with record warm temperatures.

[@ggss8647]

Just like the great barrier reef. It has only been studied for the last 38 years and today it is more plush and vibrant than when the study began

[@alf8718]

@GG SS Exactly! Except that some good honest scientists like Dr. Peter Ridd lost their jobs because of their scientifically proven claims similar to Yours.

[@bobdooly3706]

Very true

[@nedwalport4426]

Denier!

[@Friendlyfirefish]

What the fuck are you talking about? No it's not.

[@JoseSanchez-jf1lr]

The news channels are contantly lying us.

[@raderator]

The modern warm period should peak below the MWP since the Holocene is definitively cooling. If it doesn't, we can deduce there has been some mild, beneficial CO2 warming. Which is very good because the next LIA is due to be worse than the last. And the Holocene itself is due to end and the next glacial period begin. But no piddling CO2 warming will be able to help us then.

[@wilsoniakennelgoldens2259]

No you cannot! All the climate moderators are coolants and co2 is a very insignificant part of atmospheric gas. It is scientifically impossible for there to be such a thing as a greenhouse gas in the sense that it contributes to warming!

[@konradcomrade4845]

we actually may need a lot of CO2 and other greenhouse gases to keep the Earth warm in 10000 years, when the next Milankowich cycle hits. I have even more worries about the oceans, then. must watch: at 21:45 kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIrOYqeYibCejKs the diagram is revealing that on planet Earth more than 60% of all deep oceans are at or below a temperature of 4°C. Is this cold water a remnant of our last ice age(s)? Would the next, coming in 10000 years, ice age potentially freeze the whole ocean? Down to the bottom? The Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and ... 4°C is close to freezing temp, it doesn't take much. A third Snowball-earth could be much more apocalyptical than the First and Second at about 700E6 years ago. Back then the ocean bottom was probably getting more geologic heating from the mantle! An ocean, frozen to the bottom would be the end of most life.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

@@konradcomrade4845 the next Milankowich cycle will hit in 50000 years.

[@pshehan1]

@@wilsoniakennelgoldens2259 Data shows that average global temperature is rising by 3 C per s doubling of CO2 concentration as predicted by the causal theory of anthropogenic global warming,

[@wilsoniakennelgoldens2259]

@pshehan1 Warming causes C02 to increase through increases photosynthesis and animal population increase! C02 does not cause warming. It does the opposite. It is a coolant! Co2 intercepts heat from the sun, expands, and carries that heat away from the earth. It is cooling, not warming the earths surface!

[@andreasnewman8473]

Pleased to see a more complete version of this.

[@dodjerr53]

The UN ignores that great big ball of nuclear activity we all call the SUN

[@peter8aus8berlin]

@CO2 Coalition Firstly: Have you any info about the ratio by which any differential of the global temperatures effects temperatures in Groenland versus temperatures at the equator? Secondly: Some 6000 years ago with temperatures some 2° C higher than now the ice sheet was still gaining thickness (otherwise there would have no layer to take a measurement from - I assume). How is this possible? Given the "fact" that the ice caps will gone by "pretty soon" according to the climate-cultists? Thank you.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

it's important to note that the current trend of global warming is causing the polar ice caps to shrink at an accelerated rate compared to natural climate cycles.

[@pshehan1]

Temperatures were not higher 6,000 years ago. Temperatures are now higher than at any time during the Holocene. Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum Matthew B. Osman, Jessica E. Tierney, Jiang Zhu, Robert Tardif, Gregory J. Hakim, Jonathan King & Christopher J. Poulsen Nature volume 599, pages239-244 (2021)

[@dalecarpenter8828]

What year did the first snow fall on Iceland ? And how was it that there was no snow before that ?

[@theamaturepro]

There was no snow because unknown ancient civilizations had flying technologies that were fueled by melting it into water and they used it all up. After that they all burned up from climate change. Thank God the secret society of little people that live in the center of the Earth were able to cool it back down by reshaping the planet into a flat disk so we could come into existence!

[@kingmikeymack5869]

i only stumbled on this video cause I just watched The Joe Rogan Podcast with Randall Carlson🤯learnt so much and will continue to soak up all the knowledge i can 💯 #WaitingForTheCometToArrive ☄🥵🥶

[@Octamed]

Don't forget to soak up the knowledge of people you may not agree with. eg Actual climate scientists who have any qualifications what so ever.

[@HO-jp1by]

You want to learn? Ok. So the temperature graph in the video shows timescale to ‘Present’. For such graphs, present is 1950, not 2023. So, the graph is missing 73 years of warming

[@skynetsworld]

​@@HO-jp1byYou too have forgotten to mention, that the climate did get colder from 1940ish up to almost the end of the 1970s. And from there is has only been gotten a bit warmer. Conclusion: What the scientist said in this video is still valid. In the Holocene Thermal Maximum it was a lot warmer than today, it wasn't bad and obviously not manmade. Case closed.

[@HO-jp1by]

@@skynetsworld I know children are prone to linear thinking and you’re no exception. Nice piece of cherry picking the 40s…. That point falls apart as soon as you take the data points immediately prior or after. The planet is a full 1C hotter now than in the 40s. That’s significant. ‘The planet was hotter before without man so there cannot be man made global warming’ is a logical fallacy. You have a lot to learn.

[@skynetsworld]

@@HO-jp1by Explain to me why the global mean temperature went down for a period that long although the level of CO2 went up in that exact time frame!? And the point is that even if the temperature now was 1°C higher than 1950 then the temperature in the Holocene Thermal Maximum still would have been 1,5°C higher than today. You will probably answer "not global", i say it doesn't matter because it was a better climate for human populations, even only in the northern hemispere. You surely understand what I mean, regardless of how many grammatical or syntax errors my text may contain. 😉

[@mthej6211]

You know that year 0 means 1950 right? For a long time this was set as standard for geological surveys. So yeah this was 1950, if you would look further until 2000 or even 2020, you would see the warming, back to the highest temps the holocene has ever seen.

[@skynetsworld]

You have forgotten to mention, that the climate did get colder from 1940ish up to almost the end of the 1970s. And from there is has only been gotten a bit warmer. Conclusion: What the scientist said in this video is still valid. You could have guessed it when you would have thought about the time this was recorded.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@skynetsworld After rising rapidly during the first part of the 20th century, global average temperatures did cool by about 0.2°C after 1940 and remained low until 1970, after which they began to climb rapidly again. The mid-century cooling was due to a high concentration of sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere, emitted by industrial activities and volcanic eruptions. Sulphate aerosols have a cooling effect on the climate because they scatter light from the Sun, reflecting its energy back out into space. The rise in sulphate aerosols was largely due to the increase in industrial activities at the end of the second world war. In addition, the large eruption of Mount Agung in 1963 produced aerosols which cooled the lower atmosphere by about 0.5°C, while solar activity levelled off after increasing at the beginning of the century The clean air acts introduced in Europe and North America reduced emissions of sulphate aerosols. As levels fell in the atmosphere, their cooling effect was soon outweighed by the warming effect of the steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases.

[@TheA8lee]

Does it? What is your source? The scientist refers to it as 'now.'

[@brookbowen3152]

3:30 The conclusion! "We have had a global temperature increase in the 20th century, yes, but an increase from what? Probably an increase from the lowest point we have had for the last 10,000 years and this means that it will be very hard indeed to prove whether the increase in temperatures in the 20th century was manmade or its natural variation. That will be very hard because we made ourselves an extremely poor experiment. We started to observe meteorology at the coldest spot in the last 10,00 years." - Jørgen Peder Steffensen is a professor in ice core related research at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen

[@hosnimubarak8869]

Blah blah blah...

[@philippesarrazin2752]

This is what the good Jørgen Peder Steffensen himself says about it: "The film was made more than 20 years ago, and at that time it was very difficult to convince politicians - let alone voters - that we were and are facing man-made global warming," Jørgen Peder Steffensen defended himself to AFP on May 22, 2023. "I decided then - and I discussed this with Lars [Oxfeldt Mortensen] - that as a scientist I should not cherry-pick my interlocutors based on their political views," he continued. "I stand by what I said in Lars Oxfeldt's film 20 years ago, but I did not and do not agree with his interpretations." "This film, made 20 years ago, does not reflect the current state of science. In 2001, the IPCC wrote that it was 'likely' that warming was caused by humans. For a scientist, there may well have been reason to be cautious. But science has advanced greatly since then, and today there is no longer any doubt.

[@natjeffery7166]

There are differing opinions here, as to the veracity of the video and its contents. This is the unfortunate result of having branded science. We have developed a distasteful paradigm where you can pay a scientist to say almost anything and that is a real shame. Corporate intervention into science and politics is destroying the world. Yes, this video appears to be from 1998 but the content of the video, if it is to be believed, shows exactly what science has been telling us for at least all of my 72 years, that the climate has always swayed from being warmer to cooler. The climate has always changed and will continue to change. It is pure arrogance to think that man is going to control nature and, if we continue to interfere with the natural order, we are in for a massive shock.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

The average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade. This rate of recent warming is 10x that of the gradual warming that ended the last glacial period.

[@djsecAUS]

@@hosnimubarak8869 and your point is?

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@djsecAUS "This rate of recent warming is 10x that of the gradual warming that ended the last glacial period". That's far from normal.

[@bobdooly3706]

@@hosnimubarak8869 , Australia in 2022 is having the coldest Winter in 110 years.

[@bobdooly3706]

@@hosnimubarak8869 , no it isnt . You are wrong . The world is getting colder .

[@EMPI75]

it would be good if there would not be only one opinion in the main stream media here in germany. the people are totally crazy by the man made climate change.

[@WHEN-LAMBO]

The worst part is we dont have any climate crisis.. It's a lye and about totalatarien goverment control.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@WHEN-LAMBO Do you deny that globally, the years 2023, 2016, 2020, 2019, 2015, 2017, 2021, 2018, 2014, 2010 2013, are the hottest since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution?

[@MegaDeano1963]

You know putting forward facts like this causes unrest in the politically controlled science community, and the media will ignore it . (Well done )

[@philippesarrazin2752]

The facts are ... In the science of ice cores, "BP" means 1950

[@MegaDeano1963]

@@philippesarrazin2752 I would say off topic , but i think your actually just proving my point

[@philippesarrazin2752]

@@MegaDeano1963 off topic… 😀

[@HO-jp1by]

@@MegaDeano1963wow, that flew miles above your head…….

[@gillianrice-duncan5233]

While I'm not disagreeing with this, there are a few things that don't make sense to me. They go 3km down, which represents 120,000 yers. How do they know this? Why are they only showing the last 8,000 years? How do they know that the temperature in the hole hasn't changed by them making the hole? How do they know that the temperature in hole hasn't changed since the snow was laid down? Question everything!

[@Rin-qj7zt]

good questions, but the answers are out there. "They go 3km down, which represents 120,000 yers. How do they know this?" they calculated it based on the known thermal properties of ice. you can measure the rate it takes for temperature to change in ice. "Why are they only showing the last 8,000 years?" a possible reason is because you have to go down a long way to make sure the ice is insulated enough, and is permanent. so 3km down is just what it takes to get past all the temporary snowfall and such. This is also likely why the graph only goes up to 1950 instead of showing the last 70 years of warming. "How do they know that the temperature in the hole hasn't changed by them making the hole? How do they know that the temperature in hole hasn't changed since the snow was laid down?" you can calculate it based on the know thermal properties of the ice/snow. how fast it disipates, how much time it takes, how much insulation has an effect, ect. they can also measure the friction caused by the process of digging the hole and make adjustments. it's very deterministic.

[@BogdanHlevca]

They know based on the freezing melting processes, which have different structures, they count how many layers are so they can count years

[@marksouthern7542]

I agree with your questions...I don't think this video has been properly vetted by CO2 Coalition.

[@anthonymorris5084]

You're going to upset all the chicken littles.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

Blah blah blah.. Do you deny that globally, the years 2020, 2016, 2019, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2014 are the hottest on record in modern history?

[@anthonymorris5084]

You see, I told you they'd get upset.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@anthonymorris5084 How does asking a climate change question make me sound upset? Can you not answer a simple question?

[@evanpenny348]

@@hosnimubarak8869 What do yo mean by the term "modern history".

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@evanpenny348 Tens of thousands of years.

[@PombaoDumau]

Why would the current temperature of ice reflect the temperature of thousands of years ago? Does conduction not happen?

[@BogdanHlevca]

It is all about the ice structure. Obviously, the temperatures are not preserved after so many years. This part was not well explained

[@philippesarrazin2752]

It is all about the oxygen isotopes ratio in the ice.

[@GT380man]

@@philippesarrazin2752yes, that was not explained at all well & most will think they simply pushed an accurate thermometer into the hole. I appreciate that’s not what they did at all. Mind you, it’s unlikely that the subjects displayed had editorial control. I know the feeling.

[@tonygreen6185]

Another nail in the coffin of the great climate change scam.

[@tonygreen6185]

@@glugtrop2010 I get your sarcasm… .. the scam is on epic proportions.. my cousin in Florida was told 23 years ago she’d be underwater.. the levels are exactly the same.. haha

[@tonygreen6185]

@@glugtrop2010 ok stand to be educated . No net rise in world temperatures since 2010. No sea level rise Planet greener according to nasa satellite . I’ve caps show NET areas of freezing over thawing. 30.000 plus polar bears ,no evidence of extinction. Great Barrier Reef is in good condition,, we now know it bleaches naturally .. Co2 levels insignificantly higher but that high figure is good for the planet. Co2 has been much higher in the past. (I would hate to admit I’ve been duped by the MSM under the control of the world authorities (WEF WHO etc). You need to do some proper research away from the liars seeking to manipulate you.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@tonygreen6185 Please provide citations from credible sources to back up your claims (spoiler alert, he won't).

[@russellpurdie]

The answer is in their solution, you must pay us more for your fuel....to save the planet.

[@markhivin8670]

Do not blame the fuel, it's finite source what do you expect? To stay the same price until is all gone?

[@russellpurdie]

@@markhivin8670 lol, they came up with the word 'fossil' fuel, to make you believe that. Yes some is fossil, a lot is not. Don't believe it? Look at the atmosphere of some planets and moons in our solar system.

[@markhivin8670]

@@russellpurdie I do not belive anything, I KNOW that coal, oil and gas is fossil fuel and you belive what you whant.

[@russellpurdie]

@@markhivin8670 kzbin.info/www/bejne/sITJl2OmrMhkjsU

[@GeorgeJefferson-h7w]

@@markhivin8670 It's not running out. It's probably not even finite. They were pushing the peak oil lie since the 70s. Since then wells that went "dry" are now producing again. The main point of the comment is that they're using so called climate change as an excuse to tax the pants off of you for it. Price does go up even in a free market depending on supply and demand. Price goes up in a tyranny due to scams like global warming. The prices are higher than they need to be right now and it effects the price of everything that is traded and sold.

[@TimothyTakemoto]

It is a shame that the temperature data was only shown from the past 8000 years despite the record going back before that. It made me think that this may have been a cherry picked range too.

[@srmatte1]

Greatly informative, thank you.

[@dyslexictroll8708]

Global average temperatures show that the Little Ice Age was not a distinct planet-wide period but a regional phenomenon occurring near the end of a long temperature decline that preceded the recent global warming. The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of regional cooling, particularly pronounced in the North Atlantic region.

[@WeighedWilson]

Was there regional warming elsewhere to offset this regional cooling? Because the dumb guy still brings down the average of the rest of the class doesn't improve to compensate. Global average being an average and all.

[@skynetsworld]

Oh i see, everything that is inconvinient for the climate scam is only regional. ;-)

[@philippesarrazin2752]

The temperature derived from ice cores is valid for the location of the ice core.

[@skynetsworld]

@@philippesarrazin2752 If it only had regional significance, then why should anyone bother drilling and examine the cores? (The narrator says "... the ice core ... contains important data on the history of the climate _of the earth_ ... ". He doesn't say "on the history of the climate of Greenland" ) And why does the Greenland data match with the Medieval Warm Period which was experienced (for example) in the United Kingdom?

[@philippesarrazin2752]

1:25 the scientist clearly talks about the graph as temperature reconstruction from Greenland. Moreover this graph is ..not the state of the art. The roman period is known to be at least as warm as the medieval optimum in the north atlantic region. Romans used to grow vines a bit north of London. But according to that graph the roman period is almost as cold as the LIA ! The temperature reconstructions in ice cores give a regional reconstruction. If both Antarctica and Greenland ice cores agree on glacial and interglacial era, in between, the changes or variations are not synchronous. If you want a recent chart, go look for what Andy May presents and criticizes on his blog : A Review of Temperature Reconstructions, Andy May. And dont forget that the graphs shown stop in 1950 CO2 coalition is not afraid to publish obsolete data and desinform.

[@mossm717]

This is completely wrong. You can’t measure the past temperature just by sticking a thermometer into the ice.

[@mrwho30]

This is what the good Jørgen Peder Steffensen himself says about it: "The film was made more than 20 years ago, and at that time it was very difficult to convince politicians - let alone voters - that we were and are facing man-made global warming," Jørgen Peder Steffensen defended himself to AFP on May 22, 2023. "I decided then - and I discussed this with Lars [Oxfeldt Mortensen] - that as a scientist I should not cherry-pick my interlocutors based on their political views," he continued. "I stand by what I said in Lars Oxfeldt's film 20 years ago, but I did not and do not agree with his interpretations." "This film, made 20 years ago, does not reflect the current state of science. In 2001, the IPCC wrote that it was 'likely' that warming was caused by humans. For a scientist, there may well have been reason to be cautious. But science has advanced greatly since then, and today there is no longer any doubt.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

Not to mention that BP or today means 1950.

[@skynetsworld]

Oh, he wants to keep his job/pension!? How shocking if you know what happenes to scientists who don't play along. Yes, there is a global warming and it's not bad, it has happened before, only stronger, but there is no proof it's mainly caused by manmade CO2.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@skynetsworld It’s the rapid rate of warming that is new and of concern.

[@peter8aus8berlin]

Thank you! Ceterum cognito: Besides CO2 WATER is what plants (base of life) really crave. You look at the 48-yrs-average of precipitation here in Berlin/Brandenburg. From 1928 to about 1960 it is idling about then it goes down till about 1985 then it goes up. Now it is almost exactly where it was about 100 years ago. The amplitude of the respective difference to the average is tiny. In the meantime you have had an increase in population by 6 billion (from 2billion to 8billion) which makes staggering 8/2 = 400 percent. Let's say the increase of CO2 from 0.032% to 0.042% is "antropogenic", namely due to this population growth: Where then is the correlation to the precipition-curve. Blatantly obvious: There is none whatsoever.

[@HO-jp1by]

You are very confused

[@robertcartwright4374]

Dr. Steffensen does not hold the opinions this video makes him appear to hold. Look him up. This video is a textbook example of deceptive editing.

[@skynetsworld]

How surprising. Even in Germany former authentic scientists have been turned. Ok, who wants to lose his/her job? This is how it goes, when science becomes a substitute for religion.

[@sandyestabrook3898]

And I thought Water Ice was all the same temperature. What did I know.?

[@danag812]

Fabulous video to show to those who are climate hysterics.

[@Octamed]

So basically "Anything a scientist says that is good, I agree with, while anything that a scientist says that I need to change my habits for is a hoax". Look up what this guy actually says.

[@ChrisLipthorpe]

Using ollama 3.2 AI I can not find any science regarding thermometers that can record historical temperatures other than: electron spin resonance (ESR)**: Measures the energy levels of trapped electrons in the ice Thermoluminescence**: Measures the energy released when minerals in the ice are excited by heat.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

I guess the scientists here is using a metaphor. Typically temperatures are derived from the O16/O18 isotopes ratio.

[@sthnwatch]

Interesting. Most of us who are in tune with these things around earth, somehow knew this already by intuition or faith... We now have some scientific evidence to compete for loyalty with the climate change croud among th e majority around us. So, what now? We're still divided because no-one wants to find ut they were wrong. They were "scared about the bogey man" following them round or something. Climate change croud might have a valid concern. But, they never seem to want to talk about things like heatwaves and cold snaps. Same goes for those who date evolution according to the fossil record with carbon dating. What bout the heatwaves and cold snaps? What about the pressure changes and other variables at varying depths and rock densities/weights. Pressure level, Heat level, Moisture content, Acidity/Ph, Body material (Animal/Vegetable), and other variables we seem to never hear about in the reports and articles. We just hear big new scientific words that try to make anyone not there in the lab or field at the time invalid and out of the loop..

[@hosnimubarak8869]

Wow!

[@Paulo-py4mm]

It's almost as if all of these variables are included in the scientific papers and models and you simply don't read these published papers.. considering the paper this graph is take from gives the opposite conclusion, it's very obvious that you did not read it. If only scientists were intune with the earth like you say you are. Btw the graph in this video bases 1950 as the present (this is convention in geological sciences) current warming (up to 2023) since 1950 in Greenland far exceeds the mediaeval warming period.

[@danielp157]

I´m surprised this video hasn't been taken down, and this professor hasn't mysteriously died in an "accident" ...

[@philippesarrazin2752]

I'm not surprised this video posted by co2 coalition comes "as is" without any info saying that "BP" or "today" in the domain of ice cores means 1950.

[@skynetsworld]

​@@philippesarrazin2752You forgot that the climate was cooling from the 1940ish up to almost the end of the 1970s. And even if you subtract 0,5°C, then the Holocene Thermal Maximum was still about 2°C warmer than today. Warmth is good, being scammed is not.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

@@skynetsworld "forgot that the climate was cooling from the 1940ish up to almost the end of the 1970s." ?? The global temperature has increased by at least 0.8C since 1945. Please, what are the published studies / papers supporting the Holocene optimum was 2C warmer than today ?

[@QT5656]

It's very disingenuous of you not to ask Jørgen Peder Steffensen what he thinks now.

[@skanthaadsigns]

This is what happens when the Vostok Ice core drill data is censored

[@hosnimubarak8869]

By who? When? Where?

[@marionmoore665]

Needs sharing to G26 and 18 year old Greta. 🤷‍♀️💯👏🤦🏼‍♀️

[@evanpenny348]

Understand, but what's the point. Those whose views are formed on emotion are not likely to hear logic.

[@renadog1]

@@evanpenny348 Seems to be a problem with democracy all over the world. Control the media, and primary schools. Distort their emotions, confuse them (some cant even tell you what a 'women' is anymore!) and pretend to be experts and you will probably get elected. Although a billion zukerbucks will help ('drop-boxes'), and George with his $18 billion to destroy Europe's cultures (Open Society). From an 'outsiders' view point, it seems almost to be a malicious effort to finish western culture, attacked from every corner. Take the oxymoronic 'Multi-culture' for example. Its a multi-ethnic, culture-less environment that is being promoted. The energy part is crucial in destroying the middle class, ban cheap energy, send all manufacturing to 3rd worlds. Make everyone dependent on a finite Government cheque. Globalism at its finest. More tax file numbers, climate control is a smoke screen. To think that us humans can stop the weather changing. A God complex?

[@evanpenny348]

@@renadog1 Pretty much agree with all you are saying. Rather disturbing.

[@evanpenny348]

@Christopher Wallbank Thanks for this, and agree that humans do not control the weather, nor can we. Just don't ascribe responsibility to whatever your chosen God is, or that it has anything to do with our sinning, whatever is the chosen flavor of sin today.

[@Johnsmith-zi9pu]

If they haven't been hiding under a rock for the past 30 years they would already know. It's all about politics and money not science.

[@Nostrudoomus]

Is the warming we are seeing since we established the standard temperature gradient A QUANTUM EFFECT? Is it the act of measuring, observation, causing the collapse of the quantum field and when that happens HEAT IS GENERATED? This means that as depopulation occurs, less temperature measurements, it will get COLDER 🥶!

[@marksouthern7542]

Has this video been verified as credible? C02 Coalition needs to be careful to support properly verified videos. Did they get permission to put this on their you tube channel? I am a supporter of CO2 Coalition and don't want their good work to be undermined.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

This video is totally credible but out of context and misses key informations. If yo are really interested check the debunk done by potholer54.

[@Max-ht9hf]

Too many people have too much invested in this being a 'climate disaster'. there's revenue streams and reputations to be made and maintained don't you know!

[@josephh8117]

No one making this claim is actually critiquing the capitalism that they're implicitly accusing of distorting reality

[@CP-ji2bb]

Yup I’m cold times. But when the earth shifts into a heating phase, it’s fast. Then we freeze up & crawl back into cave systems. Good to know where the caves are near you. 😉

[@edru8567]

This information has been fact checked and found to be misleading.

[@OhYaSure]

By who? Link

[@hhout9242]

Great, share please.

[@HO-jp1by]

@@hhout9242 Potholer54 has done a video on it

[@Rin-qj7zt]

@@OhYaSure anyone who can read a graph knows it only goes up to 1950.

[@skynetsworld]

😄

[@billkeydel8753]

Interesting that dissenting opinions get removed. Can't stand up to scrutiny

[@GeorgeJefferson-h7w]

That's how everything is. Censorship is the opposite of freedom. And so is slavery.

[@cherylkeydel6943]

@@GeorgeJefferson-h7w I was referring to the disappearance of my previous post on this site.

[@GeorgeJefferson-h7w]

@@cherylkeydel6943 tell me about it. I was silenced and deleted a few years ago for stating facts. Facts that people are just now starting to see.

[@boris123f]

CAN YOU SHARE THOSE FACTS WITH ME ?

[@juncowan]

"There's something wrong with the SUUUUUNNN!!!!" 🤣 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKjRp35qaq-hirM

[@keith3696]

A very good point.

[@BogdanHlevca]

See my answer above, it's about the structure of the ice

[@frankdooley6451]

Just imagine giving the truth about the earth's climate, disgraceful.

[@GerardCodina-u1x]

Jørgen Peder Steffensen on climate change and global warming being real kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5awk3xpqbNppKM

[@skynetsworld]

Yeah, it's real, but it's not manmade, it's not a bad thing and it happened before, only stronger (just watch ... let me think ... oh, yes, this video).

[@a.j.rainey3024]

Greta and John Kerry won’t be happy about this video!

[@dieterkrieger1771]

Nor will Al Gore

[@vernetto]

are you saying that the temperature - measured with a thermometer - at a specific depth has not changed after 1000 years? how can you expect me to believe this one ? so in your opinion ice does not conduct heat? this is the biggest BS I have heard in a long time.

[@Rin-qj7zt]

BS? don't stop there at disbelief. that's lazy. go further. *how much* heat does ice conduct? it's a very easy thing to measure. go further. how much will conduct away given the amount of insulation above it? how does it change as the abient temperature changes? do you know? you can calculate it. it's predictable. what's the temperature of the ice 3km deep? surely it has changed. how much? if it's so predictable, can't you just use those calculations to account for the differences accumulated over time? people put a lot of effort into making these predictions, so i don't think you should dismiss them simply because the massive lengths they've gone to makes it look unintuitive at the surface level.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

THe temperature is derived from the ratio of oxygen isotopes O18/O16 in water molecule. It is not a direct reading through a thermometer.

[@dawncouzens659]

Yes! We are increasing from the coolest point in the last 10,000 years! What everyone seems to be missing (and was conveniently left out of the video!) is that the last 10,000 years has been an interglacial. Interglacials typically last 10,000 years meaning that we should now be getting colder than the coldest point of that as we enter a glacial period. We are doing the opposite, and that is the issue that we are discussing when we talk about anthropogenic global warming.

[@skynetsworld]

And you seem to be missing that warmer climate has always been good for plants, animals and for as long as they have been: humans. Besides we should be happy if we will enter the next cooling phase (whenever that may be) from a higher starting point.

[@philippesarrazin2752]

CO2 coalition is that desperate ?

[@Sea1fly]

We believe we believe do ya

[@madeinfoxtrap5539]

Oldest ice core is 120 Thousand years old. There was ice there 120 Thousand years ago….. Still ice there now More gets deposited every year Some melts Cycle continues

[@Sea1fly]

This report a joke Even I know the plant was warmer by 2 deg 66 million years ago when dinosaur walked and we couldn’t breath the oxygen they did There’s a lot more factors simpleton then temp, water currents air currents continent still separating If you don’t think we are affecting pull the ice core out of your

Note that this is a clip from a longer video, so when you only watch this part all sounds well. The part when he talks about how humans gamble by affecting the climate was cut out. He often talks about how Humans are running and experiment by releasing CO2 , but we cannot predict the outcome.

[@RuailleBuaille]

@ Hi Jörg, I'd be interested in watching the full video. Do you remember what it might have been called by any chance?

[@skynetsworld]

It was 8°C warmer and plants were big as trees we have today. Don't worry, there isn't enough oil, gas and coal to ramp up the atmosphearic CO2 up to those prehistoric level.

[@savedfaves]

Context provided by the "peaceful" UN, haha.

[@wêreldvandenluuk]

Chillax. God will fix everything! 🤣

[@charharn7011]

That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard first you put a thermometer in a hole full of ice and say you know the temperature back in time. Then you tell me that was the global temperature I really do hate being conned. The sun is what cause the climate and the temperature if you have a stove and use it to heat your food it does not get hot because your car is running. From what I see on the alarmist graph is .6 degrees elevated temperature in the last 2000 years and thermometers are not that accurate 50 years ago so we are not sure what exactly was the temperature then you throw in that CO2 gathers solar heat just as water vapor does. But CO2 is the one that is heating the globe and there is no account for heat loss during darkness. When I comment they say that I am not a professional climatologist yet nether is Al gore yet the left believed him.

[@byronbailey9229]

Bring on global warming

[@thalesnemo2841]

This old and grossly wrong video !

[@jdougswallow]

How is it wrong? You have no idea, do you?

[@1158scott]

@@jdougswallow Thales Nemo - the science denier.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@jdougswallow CO2 Coalition has ties to the Koch Brothers, the Mercer Family and the Bradley Foundation.

[@jdougswallow]

@@hosnimubarak8869 The Koch brothers produce products that benefit humanity. What does the idiots who support anthropogenic climate change produce that benefits anyone? Short answer, NO ONE.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

@@jdougswallow Okay buddy, do you deny that globally, the years 2020, 2016, 2019, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2014 are the hottest on record in modern history?