Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lq9j4Wz2QHo6dptTW3-tdIo Please click the link to watch our other Russian-Soviet Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LoX-Waa3Xb-clnCzQXpmcZ6 Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Legends-Air videos videoskzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lpl6SQpA2WBti_WsykOgtgy
@gogogomes7025Ай бұрын
"The first Cold War" Bro, that's a LOADED statement. 😂😂😂
@bholdr----0Ай бұрын
Yes is is, or, rather WAS- In recent years (say, post Crimea annexation as a rough approximation and appropriate geopolitical marker), it has began to become more and more conventional and accepted, entering the lexicon in roughly the same manner and at the same pace as rhe original 'cold war', 'first/second/third world', 'red/blue' (related to red/white, perhaps?), etc, nomenclature did during the (now relevant descriptive term re: the 'first cold war'.). It WAS 'loaded', but, now, and increasingly in the future it will be, IMHO, a useful, generally accepted, and conventional term... Unless, that is, it goes hot! (And there are different conflicts denominated by the term- is it just 'East v West'? ...Or is it as Ideologically descriptive as the original, or Russia Vs USA/NATO, or China vs. WestPac democracy's alliances, or some nebulous combination of any or some or all of the aforementioned combinations? Maybe it's just that kind of a paradigmatic catch-all for a complicated and complex set of modern geopolitical conflicts- not necessarily as close to war as the first cold war, and nowhere near as well-defined.... Sry for rambling... Thoughts?
@matovicmmilanАй бұрын
@@bholdr----0 Only the one who first came up with the term knows what he exactly meant. I'm a strong opponent of using such terms. For example the term "west" if not used strictly as a relative point in geographical sense, 100 people equals 100 different meanings.
@bholdr----0Ай бұрын
@@matovicmmilan Yet, despite that there may be 100 people with different meanings... Words and terms do have meanings. 'The Second Cold War' does have a meaning as a term, relativistic etymological nihilism aside.
@86satherАй бұрын
and %100 accurate.
@Giooooo69420Ай бұрын
Technically speaking second one was over with USSR's disintegration. Second CW started after Sino Soviet split that's when West started shifting factories to China. Here it was Warsaw Pact vs West & China There is a reason why Russia China border is heavily guarded even today
@PedroCosta-po5nuАй бұрын
First cold war? There's a second now!?!?!?!?!?
@TobiasHinz1992Ай бұрын
Yes
@williambrasky3891Ай бұрын
You’re living in it
@rootintutin2576Ай бұрын
Yeah
@Sunshine-sl3krАй бұрын
You live under a rock, don't you ?
@Giooooo69420Ай бұрын
Technically speaking second one was over with USSR's disintegration. Second CW started after Sino Soviet split that's when West started shifting factories to China. Here it was Warsaw Pact vs West & China There is a reason why Russia China border is heavily guarded even today.
@mnk9073Ай бұрын
The cuban variants are gorgeous and ingenious. Love them!
@timothyhayes9724Ай бұрын
I am very worried that you called it the "First Cold War" o_O
@robertklimczak5630Ай бұрын
Wolisz trzecia swiatowa?
@imadequate3376Ай бұрын
Have such a love for the BTR60 and BTR80 and the MTLB APCs. I heard many of the yards in Russia have no MTLBs left because of losses in Ukraine and the MTLB hasn't been produced in a very long time. Interesting and ironically the MTLB was a Ukrainian design. At least some of the US owned ones for "op for" training purposes will most likely end up in collections or museums in the states for future viewing and hopefully in a driving state for exhibition.
@memeofwheatАй бұрын
The BTR's armor is too light to mount ERA no?
@antisep1207Ай бұрын
As far as i know you nead about 30mm of armor to use contact 1 there are era Variants for apc's
@Daffa-qp9vcАй бұрын
It could cause a massive degradation of steel and of course bending the armor... could crack at worst... for that kind of armor they have
@GerardMenvussaАй бұрын
Is this the origin of the phrase "go out with a bang"? :p
@iatsdАй бұрын
It can mount ERA just fine - so long it's the ERA designed to go on lightly armoured surfaces. Very different from the stuff that goes on the front of MBTs.
@jeffkardosjr.3825Ай бұрын
It could probably take the additional plate armour upgrade like the BRDM-2s in Russian service are getting.
@iainbaker6916Ай бұрын
Look how cute it looks at the start: Big mouth, big eyes, big eyelashes and cute mouse ears. What a happy little BTR. It should get its own kids show, the Soviet answer to ‘Thomas the Tank Engine’ - ‘Boris the BTR’ 😎😂
@mohammedsaysrashid3587Ай бұрын
Another wonderful video shared by an amazing ( weapon detective 🕵️♂️) channel...video about Soviets designed BTR-60 armor vehicles... video clearly explained all characteristics of several different versions ...it's widely expanded during the Cold War years....
@cx9882Ай бұрын
BTR is iconic.
@Pectopah123Ай бұрын
Great desingn, but lighly armored. We talked these as better coffins because army test close range BTR 60/80 were just like cheese. PKM easily punctured the side armour. Russian steel? Not good so soon it was changed to BMP's
@robertkalinic335Ай бұрын
What is the close range here?
@Pectopah123Ай бұрын
@@robertkalinic335 20 to 30 meters.
@jeffkardosjr.3825Ай бұрын
Russia did give an armour upgrade to many BRDM-2s, which this could probably fit a similar kit.
@user-lt9od3ft5sАй бұрын
BTR is basically a truck with some armor, it's now when BTR's and BMP's are almost merged into one class of machines but back then they weren't.
@EnemyMangoАй бұрын
0:15 looks like an adorable mouse character with a sassy attitude.
@karloechave4577Ай бұрын
Good day! Can you do a review about the V 150 APC.. Thanks!
@WeaponDetectiveАй бұрын
Thnks for your intrest. We added the V150 to our list.
@wiktorberski9272Ай бұрын
Do USSR decided to produce the cheapest and the least advanced APC. Victor Suvorov in one od his books, probably "Soldiers of freedom" described how piór this vehicles was in realiity
@karlwaltherАй бұрын
Резун пишет фантастику. У БТР-60ПБ всего два недостатка. Он не может ехать по полю боя на одном двигателе. При посадке на ходу есть риск схватиться рукой за горячую выхлопную трубу. Для 60-70 годов он был хорош.
@timbrwolf1121Ай бұрын
Can you do a video on the history and problems of the US AAV7? There are hardly any videos on it.
@WeaponDetectiveАй бұрын
Thnks for your intrest. We added the AAAV7A1 to our list.
@sockenpuppe1057Ай бұрын
2:29 what is that ? Edit never mind found it object 1200
@GeneralGayJayАй бұрын
Has the cbrn protection ever been useful? 🤔
@oldphart-zc3jzАй бұрын
APCs (all of them, everyone's) were a mistake designed for a nuclear war that was never fought. Their light weight and high mobility however coerce their use in direct combat because when there are no IFV they're the only option. Between the US M113 and the BTR families the APC concept has resulted in many troop losses. The concept of a front line backed by "safe" rear areas has been obsolete since the 1960s. At least M113 has a rear ramp but the best place for either is far from their usual locations where they're easily destroyed. Interestingly both Russian and US troops often rode desant (M113 most commonly in Southeast Asia) because it's better to be blown a way than burn inside.
@arrowtoothАй бұрын
That thumbnail reminds me of the Shiba Inu meme and I don’t know if that was intentional or accidental.😂
@omnius3690Ай бұрын
Romanian TAB-71 is more a BTR-70 modernized not a BTR-60. First of all has the same armor like BTR-70, better than BTR-60 and the same doors between 2 and 3 wheels like BTR-70. Has extra periscopes on the sides and turret has a special sight easy recognizable on the left side, for engaging helicopters. Both machine guns can be elevated to 85 degrees instead of 30, which is good in urban fighting. Has only one diesel engine, instead of 2 gasoline engines.
@habahan4257Ай бұрын
The TAB-77 is based on the BTR-70. The TAB-71 has the same door arrangement as the BTR-60, not the BTR-70. you can see it in the video. And the TAB-71 does not have a diesel engine. It is equipped with two petrol engines, which are just more powerful than the BTR-60.
@SnowLeopard2121Ай бұрын
a casket made of iron
@habahan4257Ай бұрын
Good video. Do you change the day?
@yarmudАй бұрын
What day?
@habahan4257Ай бұрын
@@yarmud Thursday
@DerEine454Ай бұрын
9:47 Who tells them ?
@yaboyed5779Ай бұрын
Experience. 👀
@cwf_media9200Ай бұрын
was one of the most annoying vehicles in wt
@dannyzero692Ай бұрын
That's the BTR-80.
@cwf_media9200Ай бұрын
@@dannyzero692 oh I'm stupid thanks
@doragonn3y692Ай бұрын
BTR-60 doesn't even exist in War Thunder, it's the BTR-80A that is in War Thunder, 30mm APDS and a very high top speed and scouting abilities make it a very annoying vehicle to face against
@YuriyShulginАй бұрын
Сompare with OT-64 realy scrab metall.BTR-70 even worst with door under waterline.BTR-80 development of scrab metall.Same with BTR-82.Russians always late 25-30 years of development.
@Aron-79Ай бұрын
🇷🇺⚓️🫡🪖🇷🇺⚓️
@0kisshun0Ай бұрын
gaijin goingto have a loot of work with all these different variants lol.
@koa81822 күн бұрын
BTR40 .BTR60 Anti Air Systems Anti dron alarm System Troops Carrier Traditional Machine Gun's Automatic System and Semi Auto System Besitra 60 Fositra 40 Included Many platforms for Many types Fositra 40 is Good for Mndaa40 Tnla40 and Global Market's but not for Myanmar Military Council or Myanmar Central GovS 🫶🫶🫶🫶👍