WEARING THE HIJAB? || Dr. Mufti Yasir Nadeem al-Wajidi || Beyond Doubt

[@mohammadsufiyansufi5301]

Mashallah very good explanation Dr Mufti al wajidi sir

[@suhailahmad1796]

Very clear & straight forward talk, may Allah bless you.

[@ibrahimraza8431]

I am not agree with him he is giving salah his fardh but in case of salah there in s not captial punishment. But in hijab there is

[@H.a.q.q]

Masha Allah video is super informative I also love the effort put in editing to make the video more interactive and understandable. Keep up this level in the upcoming videos May Allah guide us all and reward you immensely for your efforts

[@yahyasiddiqui643]

Mashallah, love this video , extremely knowledgeable and nicely edited.

[@mohammadsufiyansufi5301]

I bless Allah Subhantala you more success knowledge

[@sunrisetruth2946]

This gentleman don't know that Quran Don't make it obligatory to cover head. Ask him to give a verse which makes it obligatory to cover head.

[@eusufmondal1316]

Detailed Answer The Qur’anic verse obligating women to cover their hair is as follows: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…” [Qur’an 24:31] Different translations of the Qur’an have rendered the Arabic word khumur [singular: khimār] as ‘veils’ [Yusuf Ali], ‘scarves’ [Abdul Majid Daryabadi] and ‘shawls’ [Taqi Usmani]. Even though it is common to use the word ḥijāb nowadays to refer to the headscarf, the word used in the Qur’an was khimār. It is important to understand that the word used only has the meaning of a headscarf, and not any other article of clothing. It cannot refer to a scarf that is draped around the neck nor to a shawl that is used to cover other parts of the body. The word khimār [meaning headscarf] is similar to the word ‘hat’. Both of them are used to cover the head. Therefore, if someone were to say, “make sure your hat covers your ears,” the covering of the head would automatically be implied in the sentence because that is what the function of a hat is. Were someone to argue that since the head was not explicitly mentioned, they could dangle a hat off each ear and this would fulfill what the speaker said, it would be dismissed as ridiculous. Likewise is the case of someone who assumes the verse is telling women to use a headscarf to only cover their chest area and not their head. This should serve as a sufficient answer to people who ask, “Where does Allah tell women to cover the hair in the Qur’an?” One might ask why Allah used this manner of speaking. Why didn’t He just mention that women must cover their hair, in plain and clear wording, so that there would be no confusion among people today? In order to answer such a question, the historical context in which the Qur’an was revealed must be understood. Women in many parts of the world used to cover their hair. In Arabia, they used a headscarf which would cover their hair and then they would drape the ends of that scarf behind their shoulders.[1] The verse clarified to women that this is not sufficient for modesty because the neck and upper-chest areas are exposed, so they must drape their headscarves over their chest areas to make sure that part is covered as well. Since women were already covering their head there was no need to tell them to cover it again. The case is similar to a corporation that tells their employees the dress code at work requires everyone to ensure that their shirt is buttoned up to the top so that the upper-chest area is not exposed. It is common culture for people to already wear shirts to work so there is no need to explain to these employees that the shirt must cover their entire back, stomach and chest areas: that would be redundant and unnecessary. Another angle to look at this issue from is to consider what the implications of the contrary argument would be. I have personally heard several people arguing that the ‘chest’ referred to in the verse is speaking about the breasts of a woman. The argument goes that Arab women used to not cover their breasts in public and the verse is ordering them to cover up. If this was the case, and if the verse required only covering the chest, as is claimed, then the rest of the verse would appear very problematic: “Tell the believing women to…draw their headscarves over their chests…except in front of their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons…” This reading would imply that a woman does not need to cover her chest [i.e. breasts] in front of all the male relatives mentioned. It is doubtful that people who make such an argument would be comfortable with such a conclusion. The final point worth mentioning is that, as far as I know, no recognized Muslim scholar for at least a thousand years after the revelation of the Qur’an has ever made an argument to the contrary about women being required to cover their hair in public. Furthermore, no Arabic linguist, as far as I know, has ever argued that a khimār is anything but a head cover. This is significant because it would mean that people who do make such an argument, namely, that a headscarf is not a requirement, have discovered something which eluded Muslims for centuries. It has not been a matter of legitimate scholarly debate in the past and it is highly unlikely that something so significant, and public, would have been completely misunderstood for such a long time. It is more probable that people who do make such an argument are, intentionally or otherwise, using intellectual gymnastics to ‘reinterpret’ the Qur’an to mean something that it doesn’t. Following the tenets of Islam is a choice. Choices should be grounded in accurate information. It is hoped that this explanation clarifies what the Qur’an really says on this issue.

[@mohdghufran7143]

ماشاءاللہ

[@IbnSaifi]

The Qur'an says "لَآ إِكْرَاهَ فِى ٱلدِّينِ" (there is no compulsion in religion) - how do you reconcile that?

[@ibrahim2238]

There is no compulsion in religion i.e. no one have right to forcefully convert someone into islam. وَ قُلِ الْحَقُّ مِنْ رَّبِّكُمْ١۫ فَمَنْ شَآءَ فَلْیُؤْمِنْ وَّ مَنْ شَآءَ فَلْیَكْفُرْ١ۙ اِنَّاۤ اَعْتَدْنَا لِلظّٰلِمِیْنَ نَارًا١ۙ اَحَاطَ بِهِمْ سُرَادِقُهَا١ؕ And say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “˹This is˺ the truth from your Lord. Whoever wills let them believe, and whoever wills let them disbelieve.” Surely We have prepared for the wrongdoers a Fire whose walls will ˹completely˺ surround them. But if willing someone Accept Islam then Allah Says وَ مَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَّ لَا مُؤْمِنَةٍ اِذَا قَضَى اللّٰهُ وَ رَسُوْلُهٗۤ اَمْرًا اَنْ یَّكُوْنَ لَهُمُ الْخِیَرَةُ مِنْ اَمْرِهِمْ١ؕ وَ مَنْ یَّعْصِ اللّٰهَ وَ رَسُوْلَهٗ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ ضَلٰلًا مُّبِیْنًاؕ It is not for a believing man or woman-when Allah and His Messenger decree a matter-to have any other choice in that matter. Indeed, whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has clearly gone ˹far˺ astray.

[@Soldier-Of-Mahdi]

Quran also says hijab is fard

[@IbnSaifi]

@@Soldier-Of-Mahdi Please define what you consider Hijab and then please provide the evidence. The Quran says take your covering (Khimar, which is not restricted to a head covering btw) and cover your breasts. Where does it say your head must be covered as well as your breasts. You might argue that it has been interpreted as such by the majority of Islamic scholarship, but this is not being fair to the text and the rationale mind. Please prove me wrong using a referenced consensus of scholars of the Arabic language that an incidental mention of a word (and its function) is ALWAYS commanded and included in the injunction mention in the same sentence. If I said “take your gun and protect your sister”, is the command to protect to protect your sister or to use a gun and without which you cannot protect your sister?

[@yousefsarwar6394]

good one

[@TheLightFromQuran]

So you taking meaning of it so no compulsion in religion if they are not praying