Webb Telescope's New Largest Observation of the Universe Confirms Scientist's Worst Fear

[@ewaldvonkleist6834]

Using "dark matter" and "dark energy" to explain unexplained variability in universal phenomenon is the same as throwing bucket of spaghetti against the wall and saying the paint color determines how many spaghetti strands stick to it. Inventing things to fill in gaps is beyond being theoretical. It is downright nonsense.

[@Dad-l6i]

Just say you don't understand and keep scrolling 😂.

[@Anthony-hu3rj]

Fun analogy.

[@douglasstrother6584]

Postulating the existence of Dark Matter & Dark Energy reminds me of the Sydney Harris "... then a miracle occurs." cartoon.

[@TonecrafteLuthiery]

Your descriptions of dark matter and dark energy are deeply misinformed. Being a scientist isn’t just as easy as watching KZbin videos like these. No disrespect, but it’s borderline insane to think you’re qualified to disagree with the scientific consensus when the extent of your scientific knowledge is these KZbin videos that misrepresent the facts for clicks.

[@TonecrafteLuthiery]

@@douglasstrother6584 You don’t understand the concepts of dark matter or dark energy if you believe that’s what scientists have proposed. That characterization is a complete straw man. You are deeply misinformed. Dark matter and dark energy are both measurable phenomena. We don’t know what causes them, and we don’t have to. Dark matter and dark energy are not names for solutions to a problem. They are the label for the problem itself, not the answers. And literally nobody says otherwise. These are two of the biggest mysteries in all of science. Science has been searching for a cause for the observations we’ve made related to dark matter and energy for decades now. It’s crazy to characterize it the way you did.

[@YouOnlyIiveTwice]

I don't know why I watch videos like this and do this to myself. I just come out of them with even more questions and no answers.

[@JohnDoeXYZ]

I think the Hubble Tension simply tells us that the expansion rate of the universe is not actually a constant, but has changed over time and continues to do so. We have no reason to think that any physical value remains constant throughout the history of the universe, but such fluctuations may be so gradual that we are unable to detect them.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Die Konstante ist nicht das Problem, sondern der Umgang. Durch den neuen Raum, nimmt gleichzeitig der Einfluss der Gravitation/Widerstand ab, was die Expansion beschleunigt, aber nur bis LG, da an diesem Punkt Raum (km³) und Zeit (h⁴) kollabieren um wieder in Masse und Bewegung zu zerfallen, was einer der Garanten ist, dass dem Universum NIE der Baustoff ausgeht. (was die Schwankungen erklärt) MfG P.

[@jasonshirrillmusic]

Don't know if it matters these days, but I still hold to the old axiom, "Great claims require great proof, so keep looking up.

[@Folker46590]

I used to love astronomy but now I hate it. It has been taken over by a 'death cult' that gets excited talking about how small and insignificant humans are and how the universe will end. That's all they seem able to talk about, and that the JW is showing signs that there was a universe before ours, is sending them into a frenzy to disprove the very idea. They HATE the idea of an eternal universe that doesn't end with everything dying. What the hell is wrong with these people?

[@ralfpaul4244]

Eine Theorie muss weder wahr sein noch Spuren von Physik enthalten, denn mit genügend Gläubigen kann sie sogar zur Lehrmeinung werden, selbst wenn leer, die richtige Schreibweise wäre. MfG P.

[@douglasstrother6584]

In any discussion of Unified Theories, Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces are taken as the four fundamental forces of nature; the first two are part of our everyday, *macroscopic* experiences. It's curious that Electromagnetism has been uniquely excluded from Cosmology. It makes sense to use *all* of the tools in the toolbox. "Magnetohydrodynamics & Plasma Physics" is discussed in Chapter 10 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition). Revisiting the concepts in "Cosmical Electrodynamics" by Alfvén & Fälthammar, and "Physics of the Plasma Universe" by Peratt deserves attention, especially in light of contemporary observations from JWST and other observatories.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Deshalb unterscheidet man zwischen Physik und Theorie. Die Kernkräfte sind ein Märchen, denn wie im Großen gelten die gleichen Regeln. Masse * Umlauf^2 * Rotation^2 * Gravitation^2 oder Schwingung^2 ART E=mc² bei c

[@douglasstrother6584]

Postulating the existence of Dark Matter & Dark Energy reminds me of the Sydney Harris "... then a miracle occurs." cartoon.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Es gibt keine physikalische Notwendigkeit für DE/DM, wenn wir Raum und Zeit als Funktionen der Energie betrachten, welche ja offensichtlich ais dem Zusammenwirken von Masse und Bewegung entstehen. "Wenn wir die Bewegung aller Massen in einem bestimmten Bereich als geleistete Arbeit betrachten, dann wäre der Raum die Ausdrucksform!" (Hawking) "Wenn wir uns allerdings die Längen (km*km*km=km³) aus der Bewegung (km/h oder m/s²) leihen um den Raum zu beschreiben, muss das was "übrig" bleibt (h*h*h²) zwangläufig die Zeit (h⁴) definieren!" (Hawking) MfG P.

[@jeffselles645]

I feel the mirror universe has a place for further thought. My sensation is that the mirror presence doesn't need to be anywhere identical to our own. Smaller or larger in volume doesn't determine its existence, only it's intrinsic parameters.

[@BradIngham-w5q]

Why gravity first? Title: Unifying Gravity: Bridging Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity through Energy Imbalance Abstract: This paper proposes a novel framework for understanding gravity by integrating concepts of energy imbalance within a non-equilibrium thermodynamic context. Instead of relying on traditional separations of quantum mechanics and general relativity, this approach suggests a unified model where gravity emerges from energy density distributions and their fluctuations across space and time from the beginning of time. By emphasizing the role of gravity as a stabilizing force acting upon these imbalances, we can reconcile quantum phenomena with the macroscopic behavior described by general relativity, thereby offering a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental nature of gravity and its role in cosmic evolution. Introduction: The quest to unify gravity with quantum mechanics has long been a driving force in theoretical physics. Traditional models often treat gravity within the domain of general relativity, describing it as the curvature of spacetime in response to mass-energy. Conversely, quantum mechanics operates under different principles, primarily addressing the behavior of particles at the smallest scales. This paper posits that gravity should be viewed as a consequence of energy imbalances throughout the universe, providing a cohesive framework that bridges these two domains. The Role of Energy Imbalance in Gravity: At the heart of this unifying approach is the idea that energy imbalances across vast regions of space give rise to gravitational phenomena. Advocating against the classical singularity model, this perspective emphasizes that gravity is not merely a response to mass distribution; instead, it is fundamentally linked to the dynamic nature of energy density. Gravity as a Stabilizing Force: Gravity emerges from varying energy densities, which create disturbances in spacetime that require stabilization. This view places gravity at the intersection of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics, fundamentally altering our understanding of how gravitational forces manifest. Temporal Dynamics and Structure Formation: This mechanism suggests that as energy density stabilizes over time, gravity plays a crucial role in organizing matter, influencing everything from the formation of galaxies to the large-scale structure of the universe. Quantum Mechanics and Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics: The quantum realm is characterized by fluctuations and probabilities, offering a different lens through which to examine gravity. By linking these fluctuations to the overarching framework of non-equilibrium thermodynamics, we can appreciate how gravity operates at quantum scales. Quantum Fluctuations and Energy Density: In the early universe, energy density fluctuations activated quantum behaviors that engaged gravitational dynamics. These fluctuations can lead to localized regions of higher density, resulting in gravitational attraction that ultimately dictates structure formation. The Emergence of Spacetime: This emergent property of spacetime aligns with the notion that quantum mechanics does not operate independently of gravitational effects. This interaction could facilitate a deeper understanding of how spacetime behaves under varying energy and matter distributions. Bridging General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: This new concept enables a reevaluation of how gravitational principles defined by general relativity can coexist with quantum mechanics. Gravity as an Information Field: The interplay of energy density fluctuations introduces the notion of gravity as an information field responding to changes in energy distributions within spacetime. This approach addresses the information paradox and inspires discussions around quantum entanglement in a gravitational context. Unified Field Theory Potential: By positioning gravity as a phenomenon arising from energy imbalances, we move toward a possibility of a unified field theory that integrates gravitation with other fundamental forces, allowing for a more comprehensive view of the cosmos. Cosmological Implications: The implications of this unified gravity model are vast and offer revised interpretations of cosmological phenomena. Cosmic Inflation Reimagined: The dynamics of cosmic inflation can be reconsidered within this framework, suggesting that rather than a singular event, inflation is an outcome of energy imbalances causing rapid expansion stabilized by gravitational effects. Dark Matter and Dark Energy: This approach suggests new mechanisms for understanding dark matter and dark energy as manifestations of energy imbalances within a cosmic context, reshaping the dialogue around these enigmatic components of the universe. Quantum Information Transfer Mechanisms: The concept of quantum information transfer mechanisms influencing all transfers from the decoupling of remaining GUT forces adds an intriguing layer to the theoretical framework. Here's an analysis of how this addition enhances the current understanding: Quantum Level Dynamics: Posits that quantum information transfer mechanisms operate at the most fundamental level of physical interactions. Adds a new layer of complexity and depth to the theoretical model, suggesting quantum effects play a crucial role in energy transfers and structural formations. Energy Density Fluctuations: Theoretical Prediction: Information-driven energy organization JWST Finding: Detected complex early galactic structures with unexpected complexity Correlation: Suggests sophisticated early universe information dynamics Gravitational Dynamics: Theoretical Framework: Gravity as stabilizing information field JWST Evidence: Observed intricate galactic clustering mechanisms Alignment: Confirms gravitational influence beyond classical models. Predictive Power: Provides a new avenue for predicting and understanding the behavior of fundamental forces and energy transfers in the early universe. Allows for the development of testable hypotheses regarding the influence of quantum information on the evolution of GUT forces. Experimental Implications: Suggests that future experimental efforts, potentially including observations from instruments like the JWST, could detect signatures of quantum information transfer mechanisms in cosmic structures. Opens up possibilities for empirical validation and the exploration of quantum effects in early universe dynamics. Conclusion: This framework of unifying gravity through the lens of energy imbalance and non-equilibrium thermodynamics marks a significant paradigm shift in our understanding of fundamental physics. By bridging quantum mechanics and general relativity, we open new avenues for exploring the intricate behaviors of gravity as driven by energy density distributions. The proposed model not only enhances our comprehension of cosmic structure and dynamics but also holds the potential to catalyze further advancements in the quest for a cohesive theory of everything.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Da am Ende jeder Schwerkraft, über die Fall-Beschleunigung in Abhängigkeit von der Fall-Höhe eine Fall-Geschwindigkeit steht, ist Gravitation in erster Linie eine Form der Bewegungsenergie. MfG P.

[@shawns0762]

Relativistic dilation explains dark matter. Dilation is the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates.

[@Darrell-vq7ew]

The big bang was never right to me. I believe in a solid state universe.

[@AsadAf-rs1mm]

@@Darrell-vq7ew like your opinion somewhere.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Energie kann weder hergestellt noch vernichtet, sondern nur umgewandelt werden, was schon gegen einen Urknall spricht. Wenn Allerdings Masse und Bewegung nur unterschiedliche Ausdrucksformen der Energie sind, gilt die auch für Alles was aus deren Zusammenwirken ensteht, wie Raum und Zeit, welche dann auch nur Funktionen der Energie und umwandelbar wären. MfG P.

[@timlong4256]

If the background redshift is due to photon propagation losses, then expansion is unnecessary and dark matter is not required either. Since the redshift increases exponentially compared to energy loss, the idea of dark energy being due to "acceleration of expansion" may just be an error in interpretation of data.

[@Knucklehead123]

Fascinating and confounding - Neural network in the human brain mirrors the galactic constructs in space that we humans puzzle about. Does that giant "brain-like" construct out there all around us wonder about "us"?

[@Anthony-hu3rj]

We are ants walking across a backyard. It's okay.

[@ShawnSmith-ec9fy]

Since we can only see to the limit in which light has travelled to us, the simplest idea would be that the universe is in a constant state of expansion/contraction in different areas of the universe...and that it might be connected to other(s) in a way that the universes are in a constant state of creation/destruction. Potentially we might have just been lucky to be in one of them where it expanded into that background 'soup'. When you also consider that time moves faster the closer you get to an object of greater mass, then there could be places in the universe where time is at a near stand-still as objects/mass travel and effect what we would view as a primordial area of the universe. Just brain-storming of course. Wonderful video! Thank you!

[@Folker46590]

The problem with this video is that the 'big bang' was not the beginning of the "Universe," just the beginning of this universe. JW has been showing that there was a universe before ours and that maybe the 'big bang' doesn't just happen once but happens repeatedly. We don't know what is beyond the observable universe, but what we see is that there was something before the 'big bang.' I find it funny how scared scientist are of the idea of an eternal universe, that is has always been here and always will be here. They act like that would mean a God could or does exists, and that terrifies them.

[@lelandgilsen9682]

for each photon from that nova, no time had passed until it impinged on the matter of our observation. The impact of photons as then impinge on matter defines the universe. The length/width/height (space) of everything revolves around time and is defined by the impact of photons. The so called action at a distance is the simple fact that no time had passed for the photo, that space rotated around time,

[@randalljsilva]

I don’t get how the mirror universe’s time goes backwards. It starts from a singularity just like our universe and expands outwards just like ours. And I don’t see why entropy would goes backwards there-so there’s no meaning to “time goes backwards” in the other universe.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Das versteht Niemand, denn Zeit ist eine Funktion der Energie und wenn sie Umgewandelt wird, bleibt nur die Information. Eine Funktion ist aber kein Ort, weshalb man ihn weder besuchen, noch rückwärts laufen kann. MfG P.

[@Zbezt]

Infinity is not a limit its just a placeholder the electron says so infinite density leads to a wider influence of the electromagnetic potential so even if it was a point there exists a void where the potential ultimately shapes the early stages and later stages as matter fills the gaps quantum-electro-thermo-dynamics~

[@justindean8126]

It's hard to measure the expansion of something if we can't directly measure the outside of it. We will never be able to measure the outside of the universe so our real only option is to study massive supernova/kilo-novas and black holes. Plus, our understanding of how things work is only as accurate as the tools we use allow us to be. Some things could possibly be answered after a few more years of technological advancement.

[@ralfpaul4244]

Bitte keine Physik, denn der Theo kann zwar Alles erklären, aber nicht mit Physik. MfG P.

[@carlorossi2788]

Ancora! Insistono... L'universo e' termodinamico e' galileiano

[@AsadAf-rs1mm]

the universe is orderly existed even before humans its our human imagination the ways we imagine.

[@charlesdehaven2375]

Would bubble universes also have mirror explosions? What experimental evidence supports bubble universes? Given the approximate age of the universe how far back can we see? The Webb has conflicting evidence of large massive galaxies but how close to the CMB can we see?

[@rajman7644]

What I want to know is, if the fastest anything can travel is at the speed of light, how can the universe be larger than 28B light years across, given the age is about 14B years? I've seen some estimates at 92B years across.

[@SpaceGhost-1999]

Space itself isn’t traveling, it is expanding. It can grow faster than the speed of light. Anything within space is limited to moving at c, and can only achieve c if it is massless.

[@ScoriacTears]

0:15 . . . Imagine that the universe is an explosion that We get to ride for a while for entertainment, and We are cosmic surfers. . . . . . yeah naa that's all I'm saying.

[@dondattaford5593]

No matter what you can't put eternity in a balloon

[@ralfpaul4244]

Die Ewigkeit ist relativ, da auch die Zeit nur eine Funktion der Energie und umwandelbar ist. MfG P.

[@Absurditykindlesconfusion]

The universe WAS expanding!

[@ralfpaul4244]

So lange sich etwas bewegt expandiert das Universum weiter, allerdings nur bis zum Punkt von LG, da der Raum nicht mehr Energie aufnehmen kann hoch*breit*tief=LG*LG*LG=Bum, kollabiert er gemeinsam mit der Zeit, da Beide ihre Energie aus der gleichen Quelle, der Bewegung (km/h oder m/s²) beziehen. MfG P.

[@charliethompson7942]

Thought experiment: suppose the 4th dimension of spacetime, time, is related to the other dimensions 3 in such a way that as space expands the rate at which time elapses slows. In the early universe time would have been elapsing much faster than today and the universe would be much older that we think. A photon released billions of years ago and detected today would appear to be red shifted, as an audio recording played at a slower speed, even if space were not expanding. Thus, the difference between early universe measurements of the Hubble constant and late universe measurements is due to a slowing of the rate at which time is elapsing as the universe expands.

[@SpaceGhost-1999]

Einstein proved that time is relative to your frame of reference. Relativity. There is no absolute time. It matters not when in the evolution of the universe you measure your ‘time’, it only matters where you are (gravity) and how fast you are moving (relative to c).

[@letstrytouserealscienceoka3564]

A mirror universe only looks backward from our perspective. If intelligent life arose in such a universe, they would see us as the mirror. For them time would move forward, their matter would be normal and ours anti, and they may or may not consider what they see as an electron to have a positive charge since that designation is arbitrary. Such a universe would not be a perfect mirror of ours, it would not have an Earth with "anticlones" of us living there. Chaotic systems operating and interacting for 13+ billion years would not yield the exact same results. Chaotic systems are deterministic but also unpredictable.

[@gary284macca2]

OH NO THIS IS ALSO MY WORST FEAR......................................HELP ME I CANT SLEEP.....😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@elijahfluw4347]

Stop being awake and you will sleep fine.

[@davidcarlson2152]

Don't bet against Albert Einstein or Neil Turok.

[@myalterego2878]

So watching Jupiter on Amazon. Y'all can prove hydrogen forms in gas nebulas I assume?

[@stratcat3216]

A lot of assumptions here. for example Believing in the Big Bang itself.

[@clarencegreen3071]

It all goes back to that red-shift thing. If there were some mechanism other than doppler to account for the red shift, perhaps the universe would not have to expand and we could rid ourselves of the big bang. But I really don't know, and I suspect no one else does either.

[@mccorrect3470]

Post this burger when they least expect it 🍔

[@elijahfluw4347]

Fuck! I didn't expect it 😢.

[@007EnglishAcademy]

''....measure the numbers...''?

[@the1jamman]

What if in some parts , there are galaxy's which are more dense and in the space between then less dense? So the calculation is completely off . And they need to go back and think about it some more . By the time they retire , they might have it figured out , or not . Yhe next generation needs for something needs to be wrong.....

[@morgunstyles7253]

Was no big bang

[@aracoixo3288]

🎉

[@johnrathbun2943]

You mean the "I think I know everything got it wrong? That's OK because they will still teach in schools the wrong theories. 😅

[@Karl-cf1hy]

Multidirectional inflation is my guess . 🫨😵‍💫🥴👍Lol