ChatGPT Teams Plan: Is It Worth the Upgrade?

[@webcafeai]

Navigate to key moments👇 made via tubestamp.com 02:27 - Discussing options for upgrading to teams. 02:55 - Successful payment and team member invitation process. 04:03 - Exploring workspace management options. 05:22 - Overview of teams chat features. Recap by TubeStamp ✏️

[@jeffg4686]

So, if you're an individual and you also want the enhanced functionality you have to pay $50 a month - great. How about they give a slightly higher price for individuals that also want the benefits (like 30 or 35)

[@webcafeai]

Agreed, this seems like the best option for people who just want privacy and more messages.

[@jeffg4686]

@@webcafeai - and the other thing is - if an individual wants the functionality and is willing to pay for the 2 seats (for whatever reason...), then there needs to be clarification as to whether or not an individual can purchase the 2 seats as a individual - else it just sounds like they're trying to make business harder for those that work alone.

[@TheLoneCamper]

Audio sounds good, tiny bit of echo must be a fairly large open room.

[@webcafeai]

Thank you for the feedback. I have improved my audio in my more recent videos!

[@kritikusi-666]

Are the messages pooled between team members or are they separate, do you know?

[@Soccer5se]

The messages are separate. Each team member as 100 messages per 3 hours each.

[@WladimirJAlonso]

And there's another issue: if you have, as I do, several customized GPTs and old GPT conversations you value, you can't transfer them to the team account. So, you end up having to maintain (and pay for) two separate accounts: a personal one and another within the team group. This will likely be the deal-breaker for me in deciding to suspend my team account.

[@lancewheeler854]

How does the Admin accept GPTs?

[@eliasvanloon5649]

6:53 So are you able to use third part GPTS in a shared enviroment?

[@alexander7162]

Im after more messages personally, that's why im considering an upgrade. How do others manage the small message limit of GPT plus

[@MojaveHigh]

I'm a developer: I use GPT 3.5 when I can for really basic programming/docs questions, GPT 4 for more complicated prompts. When I run out of messages, I go back to writing my APIs and testing them with Postman. Then when I can use GPT 4 again, I can test my newly updated APIs. It works, but it is annoying.

[@webcafeai]

Great advice!

[@TunedinTony]

Im wondering how the team is better than letting teammates get their individual plan for $20?

[@tmmerlo]

Is there any way to embed teams gpts to my website or integrate directly with Zapier? I’m building an AI tech support platform and would rather keep the user in my walled garden instead of opening the actual Chat GPT website.Thank you for the great videos.

[@webcafeai]

As of now, I believe not; in order to get the capabilities of GPTs, we would use the OpenAI API. Although the actual GPT itself that we create in ChatGPT is under that domain. That being said, this is definitely a big demand in the community, so we could see something like this in the future.

[@brandonpainter573]

Question: I saw that there were a lot of Custom GTP in your personal account but with your teams since it is new, there was the only quick one you made. Does all of the other ones from your personal account transfer over to the teams account? I’ve put a ton of work in all mine and don’t want to have to redo all that work if it does not.

[@JackSchultz1]

They do not transfer, and what is weirder, you can’t have one browser tab open with your personal plan ChatGPT interface open and another tab with your teams plan ChatGPT interface open-it will switch both browser tabs when I switch one of them.

[@DaveEtchells]

@@JackSchultz1That’s a huge PITA. Skill Leap AI just posted a video about OpenAI now allowing you to merge accounts, then delete the Plus version one.

[@DavidGodin]

This whole context window size thing is confusing. Am I really getting a 128k context window with a regular Plus account?

[@dakotamorgan]

no. you are only getting 128k token context window through the api. not in chatgpt

[@Sirfrummel]

My question is... they are advertising gpt4 32k in teams, so do we have gpt4 8k in plus, or gpt4t (in SOME sort of context) in plus?

[@webcafeai]

So, for 128K, that is referring to when we access the OpenAI API. In the context of ChatGPT, it will typically identify when you have provided too much information. The rule of thumb in speaking to these language models is that the less and more specific the data, the better the output.

[@boomerstrikeforce]

can you share a chat link with another team member so they can interact with it too, or it is only a read only type share situation?

[@jacka3280]

what is the cap limit different between two? they never make it official? What do they mean by more cap limit? like by how much?

[@hyperred4668]

i have chat gpt plus since launch day, so now and than i send 100+ messages in 3 hours without a problem and sometimes it caps after 30+ massages. so 30 is the minimum u can send per 3 ours. they will let you for example generate at least 30 images every 3 hours or so.

[@Ja_Wise]

Hello. I need help with the Team plan. How can I find out which Member sent an invite to other users? Notifications about this don't come to the Owner and Admin. And there's no option to disable the ability for Members to send invites. One incorrect invite can turn into a huge bill at the end of the month when participants invite just anyone. How can this be fixed? Perhaps this is an idea for one of your videos...

[@chathurikasandarenu3241]

We purchased a Team account and it seems that even a "Team Member" can invite new members? And ultimately if the invitee accept that invitation, we ends up adding another account and paying for it. Is there a way to control it?

[@yacobcastro]

I’m not sure if my questions or not were answered from this video: I’m running for office in 2 years and I’m trying to have ChatGPT read our state house and senate bills in real-time to determine which bills affect my constituents the most. I reached out to OpenAI and they told me to purchase Teams. I watched your video and it didn’t show any use so not sure about how to go about doing this. I may have to call OpenAI again if I can’t get the answer here.

[@JustMamba]

That's going to take a little more work than just plain chatgpt. You'd have to set it up specifically to do that. It can be done, though, with a little work. The thing that I think might need adjusting is the real time. If you were more specific about that I might be able to help you out. I mean as long as you have access to that data you need it to read then it should be a piece of cake.

[@yacobcastro]

@@JustMamba I'm definitely interested in working with you. When I say real-time I mean all the current bills in legislation.

[@armankarambakhsh4456]

Thank you for the great content. A bit clearer audio maybe? Perhaps better muc custimusation, or the magnificent Nvidia Broadcast app.

[@webcafeai]

Thank you for the feedback!

[@1980Michaels]

Thanks, useful video.

[@ByDylanYoung]

Does Team allow storing of unlimited Custom Instructions, as they've been promising for their (still absent) Pro plan?

[@webcafeai]

It seems it's by user as of now.

[@Tommy-Handsome-and-Smart]

thanks for the video m8

[@iwsutw]

Good video

[@БахтиярНурлыбай-ы7и]

if I pay $60 and then I can add people up to 149 for free?

[@librarycollection3795]

For those who are wondering, the team plan is $500 annually (2 people minimum) as opposed to $240 for basic membership. If you really need it, it may be worth the extra money. It wasn't worth it for me.

[@enriquemontero74]

I would like to be part of your team, I would pay the 30 dollars without a problem, friend, to have that 32k context window and more messages It would be good to know if you are looking for people to share teams with,.

[@melvinjongen1697]

Hey im interested to come on your team im willing to pay

[@dkjb5756]

There are billion on people, If chat GPT reduces some of its subscription plan Open AI will be in profit

[@RobBrulinski]

what makes the upgrade worth it is: Advanced Data Analysis

[@YA-tr1lb]

to expensive

[@ThorParker]

Why has chatgpt got so bad???

[@teenagetommytwatface]

So just so I know - am I still paying for my GPT4 account like normal? On top of the $60, so I'm paying $80p/m?

[@webcafeai]

Yes, which is definitely another drawback.

[@ancientelevator9]

Unfortunately I hit the message limit like everyday (sometimes multiple times)... is it worth the $40 extra... or maybe i just work on different tasks for awhile... like right now I have an hour of "no access" gpt time

[@Soccer5se]

I was looking at splitting the two accounts with a colleague. So, it only ends up being $5 (plus vat) more a month. For now, I usually switch between Bard and Copilot when I get close to or hit my limit on ChatGPT.

[@humphuk]

Taken one for the team(s)........we appreciate it

[@DaviAreias]

I just migrated and the transition feels like a mess, they don't upgrade your plan but actually charge you twice, so it's 20$ plus $25 (if you were naive enough to pay for a year in advance) or $30, you can cancel your plus subscription and it seems to still works, however you can't transfer your conversations. I'll probably use it for more 2/3 months but I'll probably be migrating to the open source models in the future.

[@Nursultan_karazhigit]

Thanks for the video . I still don't understand 100% what the Teams Plan is for. You can just create a regular Gpts with Chat gpt plus

[@webcafeai]

Thanks! I think the idea here is more in the sense of having an admin panel through which you can now supply sensitive company data for the GPTs and also see how your employees interact with it. The big thing here is that the value you receive will only be as good as how well people talk to ChatGPT.

[@RodskiDimitri]

Your video is fantastic, man, but lacking in audio quality, you can invest in a better-quality mic.

[@maxziebell4013]

I did upgrade … annual. Calling it an upgrade is relatively strange, as your original subscription retains. I had to cancel the subscription on my personal account to avoid paying double. Feels like a new subscription, not an upgrade.

[@webcafeai]

The confusing part of having the subscription on your personal as well as the new one with teams definitely should be sorted out. It should feel more like an upgrade, as you describe.

[@joshuavedder7915]

Wait? So you have to pay for both unless you cancel the personal??

[@maxziebell4013]

@@joshuavedder7915exactly. It is an additional plan that can be used without the personal subscription. Hence the terminology is somewhat confusing…

[@ezraezeiru2082]

Would it be possible to create a custom GPT for your whole team to use ? And also is there a cap on the number of team members that can be invited into the workspace ?

[@FredericVereecke]

I believe it is 149

[@YakTownLLC]

🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *🌟 Introduction to ChatGPT plans* - Overview of ChatGPT Plus and Teams plans. - Mention of video structure and content. 01:13 *🚀 Features of the Teams Plan* - Enhanced message caps and workspace management tools. - Focus on privacy with no training on user data. 02:11 *🛠️ Pricing and Plan Selection* - Explanation of pricing options for Teams plan. - Considerations for solo users and minimum seat requirements. 03:06 *📊 Workspace Setup and Role Selection* - Initial setup steps for a new Teams workspace. - Role selection for workspace members based on business needs. 04:01 *🖥️ Managing Workspace Members* - Features for managing and inviting workspace members. - Distinction between personal and workspace accounts. 05:12 *🔐 Privacy and Security Settings* - Settings to manage external and internal GPT usage. - Enterprise-level options for data privacy and security. 06:23 *🌐 Customization Options for Workspace* - Options to customize interactions within the workspace. - Impact of settings on workspace-wide or individual user level. 07:05 *📝 Creating Department-Specific GPTs* - Process and benefits of creating tailored GPTs for departments. - Sharing and collaboration features within the workspace. 08:28 *💼 Evaluating the Teams Plan for Small Businesses* - Cost-effectiveness for businesses with fewer than ten employees. - Potential for centralizing data and tools in larger teams. 09:38 *📈 Strategic Use of Teams Plan for ROI* - Considerations for maximizing return on investment with the Teams plan. - Importance of employee training on leveraging AI tools effectively. Made with HARPA AI

[@alexhearn9270]

I feel like these features should be included in the plus plan! The way the payments are set up is insane. Definitely NOT worth it.

[@andrewley5889]

What’s the difference between Enterprise and Teams?

[@JedHurricane]

Great now we can see those rosy pimples in 4k. lol jk

[@BruceWayne15325]

The Plus plan isn't even worth it to be honest. Don't get me wrong, it's great. It's just that they limit your number of prompts so severely that it's useless for anything but futzing around with. You can't even make 1-2 GPT's before you hit your prompt limit, and are forced to wait 3hrs to try to find that magic prompt that ChatGPT will actually obey more often than not.

[@boivinlouis]

That's not true, you can make 40 requests every 3 hours. I use it a lot everyday and chat 4.0 is much more sophisticated than 3.5.

[@BruceWayne15325]

@@boivinlouis more often than not, you'll find that the first prompt that you try with ChatGPT either will not give you what you want, or it will be unreliable, so you have to constantly tweak the prompts until you find that magic prompt that mostly works, most of the time. There's a reason that prompt engineering is an actual job description now. Sure, you can just throw in a prompt and move onto making another GPT, but I can guarantee you your GPT's will be all but worthless.

[@anggara7549]

@@boivinlouis I quite agree with Bruce, GPT-4 is impressive, I can confirm that, but it's similar to GPT-3.5, whether the free or pro version. If your way of asking is less accurate, less comprehensive, or less structured, then the AI's responses are often less precise or satisfying. Even though we've previously found good "prompts," sometimes those "prompts" become ineffective, and we have to create new question structures. The "prompts" we thought were correct sometimes provide unsatisfactory answers, possibly due to ongoing updates to the AI or errors from that end. So, the limit of 30 messages/3 hours (in my country) is indeed too restrictive; at least 100 messages or 60/3 hours seems more appropriate.

[@DaveEtchells]

Oddly, I’ve never had it tell me that I’d exceeded my question limit and I’m a pretty intensive user. What does it look like when it throttles, does it tell you explicitly?

[@BruceWayne15325]

@@DaveEtchells yeah you get a message saying that you've reached the limit and it will tell you what time you can make more queries. I ran into the limit all the time because I was making image based GPT's and anyone that has worked with Dall-E will tell you that it takes a lot of prompt engineering to get the perfect prompt that gives you exactly what you want 99% of the time. You can get a prompt that works sometimes very easy, in one or two tries, but if you want to test your GPT a lot to find out how reliable (or unreliable) it is, you're going to hit that limit super fast as you tweak, then test, then repeat.

[@joshuavedder7915]

Couldn't tell if you get 100 messages limit with a Team account or whether you get 100 messages plus your personal 40 messages, totalling 140. Also couldn't tell if you get 100 messages per workspace, so if you make more workspaces you get higher message caps?

[@MichaelBoyens]

Another great video, thanks. Although I am not sure I agree with your conclusion as I am someone that daily hits the Plus usage cap (especially when building or working with GPT's that contain large knowledge files - eg 16 prompts every 3 hours), so 2.5x that limit is much better for me and my team. Also the fact that you can restrict the use of external GPT's that are fundamentally insecure is another positive with the teams account. And finally that you are by default opted out of training - makes us feel more secure - although Plus also gives you the option to "Opt out" of training so this may be a mute point. I'd be interested in your thoughts on my feedback?

[@webcafeai]

I find myself not hitting the limit that often for my current workload with GPT, but I can definitely see how that would be a major plus for some people. I find that, and privacy, probably the biggest selling points for me personally, though I wish it were just more cost-effective.