Ph.D Wesly Cecil’s humorous lecturing style is fantastic that attracts the audience attention. At the same time, the way how he cohesively exhibits his serious understanding over any philosophers is unbelievable.
@PhilCrothersComplex9 жыл бұрын
One of the most comprehensive and compelling summaries of a person's life in philosophical work I have had the pleasure of listening to. Thank you for sharing.
@Laocoon283 Жыл бұрын
The whole thing be summed up in a single sentence though. Woman should have rights... not really any substance at all.
@kappaprimus Жыл бұрын
@@Laocoon283did you skip the entire existentialism part? And the moral dilemma that it brought?
@cheri238 Жыл бұрын
Professor Cecil, this one placed chills in my hair on my arms as I listened to you about Simone de Beauvoir. What an extraordinary woman and a woman I get. Although, I must read these writings she wrote. Again, I love your humor as you teach. Furthermore, you make philosophy a joy. With the deepest appreciation and respect for your intelligence.
@elaineangelopoulos445910 жыл бұрын
What a relief that Simone de Beauvior was confident and had the will and the guts to write and to live the life she proposed in her work. What a relief that so many were inspired to seize the courage to do so as well. What a relief that there are professors out there who recite her work in a positive light to empower their students to discuss freedom rather than constant repression. As for the laughter in class, consider the fact that the professor had found a way to address the study of philosophy to a student body in a kind of communicative engagement that they needed to retain this study. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the method.
@_Sakidora_5 жыл бұрын
de Beauvoir was a disgusting pervert who was fired for having sex with her pupils, groomed and procured girls for Sartre and signed a petition to legalise paedophilia in France in 1977 (among others including Sartre and the darlings of post-modernism Foucault and Derrida). She also abandoned Jewish friends during the Nazi occupation and collaborated with the Nazis working for a Nazi mouthpiece radio station. Add to that her support for Stalin and the murderous regime in the USSR and I seriously wonder what 'relief' is there in reciting her work?
@mariealexa65785 жыл бұрын
I agree. I think The Indendepent Woman should be read by all girls by the age of 16. I have not yet read The Second Sex. Women are economic beings. I hate to say when I realized that we shouldkeep our own economies
@MegaGraceiscool3 жыл бұрын
@@_Sakidora_ Cut it out with the virtue signaling. You can look at her arguments for women without throwing ad hominems.
@bigbrother4ever3 жыл бұрын
@@_Sakidora_ I like French writers and French philosophers but I hate this de beauvoir with passion. Sorry. I even can't stomach this lecture
@_Sakidora_3 жыл бұрын
@@MegaGraceiscool Disprove a single thing I have said. Prove she was a woman of principle in her actions rather than the disgusting woman she really was. And I you shouldn't use phrases like virtue signalling or ad hominems when you clearly don't know what they mean. It makes you look an absolute fool.
@boredgrass10 жыл бұрын
Philosophy teaching is alive and kicking! :-) It was an immense pleasure! Looking forward to the other lectures! Thankyou!
@Heytherexoxo7856 жыл бұрын
@Bruno56 heey??
@SagesseNoir10 жыл бұрын
Her idea that legal rights are necessity but not sufficient for freedom is quite interesting. She had women in mind. But Blacks, workers and other oppressed human groups have discovered after winning certain legal rights that this was important but not enough to win them full freedom. Perhaps this is the case with every excluded or proscribed human group.
@hamooon3 жыл бұрын
lectures don't usually give me the chills. beyond excellent
@curiousme82 жыл бұрын
This is an exceptional lecture! So lively! Simon is such an inspiration. Thank you for your work, dear Wes!
@nurapetrov59014 жыл бұрын
A great lecture, which demonstrates her brilliance and originality in a completely sympathetic and accurate way. A pleasure to listen to it.
@garywillis74678 ай бұрын
Wes Cecil - Fantastic introduction to Simone De Beauvoir and the parameters of her philosophy. Lucid, political and humorous - very stimulating 👍
@robertpedrin38454 жыл бұрын
Riveting, easy to understand humorous and fact laden talk even for the lay non-philosopher on de Beauvoir's approach to life and her concepts of true freedom. It has current application for our approach to life today with its emphasis on one's individual effort needed to break with conformity in order to achieve her (your) goals. A must listen to lecture!!
@pchabanowich3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for this gift. 💐
@xiongluong2 жыл бұрын
Wow great talk and magnificent ideas. I am particularly inspired by de Beauvoir's take on (unconventional) relationships.
@RobDiGreen11 жыл бұрын
These talks are exceptional. Many many thanks.
@blueknightmv45074 жыл бұрын
She sounds a lot like Stirner to be honest. In regards her proposition to reject narratives because they exist outside of the individual and cannot be made ones own. While she attacked certain subject matter differently than Stirner, the two have pretty inspiring works in regards to individualistic philosophy and ethics.
@hejdingamleraev7 жыл бұрын
Wow! A superb lecture by a very entertaining and engaging lecturer!
@MilciadesAndrion6 жыл бұрын
She was an incredible writer and her ideas helped to change how society sees women
@jizzykad11 жыл бұрын
Thanks, having to write a long-ass essay in French, thanks for your informative way of making this process less painful!
@Summer-kb2dm2 жыл бұрын
"Living is: not knowing if everything is going to work out."
@wondergirlnewyork2 жыл бұрын
Profoundly moving discussion. Thanks Prof. Cecil. Good stuff. 😊🎒♥️
@brendankeane57259 жыл бұрын
Female economic liberation is perhaps better associated with animal domestication and cottage industrys. For example, women who owned chickens and sold eggs were able to draw income and from a cottage, use those resources to knit and produce goods they owned completely. Production at this level was of course only possible when the rent was not too high. Unfortunately this lecturer is romancing industrial revolution which broke cottage industries, and denied many highly skilled female producers their first true income. The macro historical narrative of agriculture as backward and industry as modernizing skips important issues of landownership and self-sustainable economic issues that were disrupted by colonialization and monopolization of the modes of production.
@kleingenno11 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Entertaining and informative, that's how a lecture should be! Helped me a lot to prepare an own presentation for a class about sexism.
@palasseibel10 жыл бұрын
The first exemple! That was great.
@elevision43378 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this lecture. It was a pleasure to listen to it.
@known_film40814 жыл бұрын
I have found the youtube channel for me ... finally
@simonapascariu22432 жыл бұрын
Amazing and true. THANK YOU!
@yungcarljung97328 жыл бұрын
This lecture was absolutely hilarious, I loved it in every respect! Are you familiar with Larry David's "Curb"? Sometimes you remind me of him. Loving all your videos, please keep it up! Some of the greatest content of KZbin.
@citycrusher9308 Жыл бұрын
16:34 - middle class women didn't want to give up their easy lives to take on work
@yasha12isreal8 жыл бұрын
this was so good
@MrWhite-bm9np5 жыл бұрын
A prolific thinker, in her own time as well as in ours.
@sophitran3 жыл бұрын
Great subject and presenter !
@jessicapatrick-hooper45586 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for posting these lectures
@rubyquail2 жыл бұрын
the fastest growing homeless demographic in US right now are older women of all backgrounds but primarily brown/black BUT women who already served humanity, trusting that we would not end up homeless. we can't actually hang out in cafes and chart our own economic.futures until freedom from those.who own and control the means of production shift consciousness and values.
@MG-ge5xq4 жыл бұрын
Well, SdB was really great about her thoughts on the liberation of = fairness for women. But, what she said about China was just stupid or blind. What about the thousands of political murders and prison camps? What about the devastation of historical heritage? What about the extremely stupid industrialization attempts that led to 30 million deaths of famine?
@johnbizzlehart2669 Жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@bromley1218 жыл бұрын
Read my blog on Simone de Beauvoir which commemorates the 30th anniversary of her passing: abromley91.wordpress.com/2016/04/05/simone-de-beauvoir-conformism-wasnt-her-thing-but-freedom-was/
@Menapho3 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT
@kungalofofamww2anzacroylen41310 жыл бұрын
ideas well expressed I havnt read her literature I think helpful regardless as one may move through most of these phases in life in a moder city
@annebronte43 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! I am new to your channel. Thank you.
@kristinehartgen40277 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Inspiring
@kr574610 жыл бұрын
Professor Cecil!! I love that movie TIN CUP!!! ;)
@guiadetodo26546 жыл бұрын
Dowunload Wise Universal from Play Store, it`s great
@madmax84052 жыл бұрын
The mother and queen of "Me Too".
@eleenhendy2 жыл бұрын
The mother and founder of all things me and my happiness I-generation and congratulations to all her followers
@kickywicky46164 жыл бұрын
What you edit is Aristophanes
@inthemomenttomoment2 жыл бұрын
Yah, it's either history or her story, ☯️ but you have to believe your own story 😄🎭 before you can believe anyone else's 🤥 story🤺 Direct Experience is The Now🧘
@bilinguru3 жыл бұрын
Wes Cecil is obviously a very engaging and entertaining lecturer and clearly gets energy from the audience. But, I find it a bit cringeworthy how some people laugh a little too loudly at even the most marginal of Cecil's jokes. These students undoubtedly are sitting in the front row and attend every lecture. I do not condemn or criticize any student for being enthusiastic learners, particularly adult students in the United States, where one can be forgiven for thinking mental enrichment has fallen woefully behind the rest of the world. And I certainly don't begrudge Cecil for hamming it up a little. Heck, I do it too if it helps keep my students engaged with the material. But there's just something about sycophants that sucks a little joy out of a classroom. I know I'm nitpicking here. I just can't help it. Please take the guffawing down a notch. it's not all about you. I'm sure Dr.Cecil knows you enjoy his class - he doesn't need a chorus of braying donkeys to affirm that he is charming.
@yasha12isreal7 жыл бұрын
do Albert Camus please
@kerryflorence3495 жыл бұрын
Didn't 2 women score ahead of Sartre
@g.boychev93555 жыл бұрын
But she was unwilling to face one fact about the human condition: that humans are not free and that she was working with a conception of the human subject inherited from the conception of the human soul in Christianity. She bought into that particular story, despite her atheism, and that's where her conception of freedom comes from. But there is no soul, there is no pure human subject that is "just human and not a woman, a man, an African-American, a member of the bourgeoisie", etc, and there is no such thing as human freedom. Those are myths.
@J.Gaytan11 жыл бұрын
good lecture big help
@LANCSKID2 жыл бұрын
Ruined by adverts intervening.
@sybo5911 жыл бұрын
I hate an audience that doesn't know when to laugh or not.
@sybo5910 жыл бұрын
***** Yes.
@apexxxx106 жыл бұрын
sybo59 laugh or cry?
@SagesseNoir10 жыл бұрын
Has anyone done a study of attitudes towards feminism of different classes of women or (at least in America) different racial groups of women?
@JustinMBailey8 жыл бұрын
I suddenly find a lot of similarities btwn her and Max Stirner, anyone else?
@zenobevandaele26196 жыл бұрын
yes, the cultural conventions she talkes about could easily be replaced by Stirners spooks
@BlindEyeJones9 жыл бұрын
Yeah, people have a choice to choose, even if they choose to not to choose what the communists say have really been chosen for them, and that they should have chosen the alternative choice to really prove that they have a choice after all. Again, wonderful humor and erudition. As well, you have the voice and manner of a young Jimmy Stewart!
@savagebunny1440 Жыл бұрын
33:00
@michaelkelemenToronto5 жыл бұрын
This is a fun and interesting lecture but it becomes almost intolerably dishonest when he ridicules gay people who want to get married, claiming that they are only trying to fit into cultural stereotypes that they mindlessly accept. He should know that there are all sorts of legal issues that are relevant to a relationship and why shouldn't they seek religious acceptance as well if they are into that? Then he endorses de Beauvoir's praise for the Chinese Communist regime -- even after the Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square. He claims that the party only does what the people want and when they don't the people revolt and the party self-corrects. If students Tiananmen Square happened today, he says, "the people" would go down there and beat the hell out of them. Why fight for democracy when Big Brother takes such good care of you? And all the while he is telling us that de Beauvoir was only concerned about freedom.
@AJoe-ze6go2 жыл бұрын
"Who's the doctor?" Pretty freakin' obvious - if the father is dead, she has to be his mother.
@klauda73465 ай бұрын
You dont need bread, eat cake.
@Over-Boy42 Жыл бұрын
Did Beauvoir ever comment on asexual people?
@citycrusher9308 Жыл бұрын
5:35 - tried to get married to a rich man and leech off him - it fell through
@LANCSKID2 жыл бұрын
Ruined by adverts intervening every couple of minutes. VERY ANNOYING. I eventually switched off.
@citycrusher9308 Жыл бұрын
19:38 - pretends cinderella fantasy was about children
@JullyFlint9 жыл бұрын
Vive la Reine!
@gperson19673 жыл бұрын
The Second Sex changed my life. It's like the bible, but true and for women.
@Laocoon283 Жыл бұрын
He clearly edited out the plethora of rape scenes in the classics lol. Dont how you didnt pick up on that.
@HxH2011DRA5 жыл бұрын
Max Steiner but a Woman
@lg1692 ай бұрын
no one had articulated these ideas before because they are a 100% nonsensical
@johnstewart70256 жыл бұрын
Her humanizing, existential quest for freedom sounds a lot like the theist, who is always seeking the sacred or God despite his or her lack of death. In other words, their version of the religious life is the quest.
@sylviavasquez9523 Жыл бұрын
Not keen on the unearned laughter.
@tigerlilysoma5882 жыл бұрын
Video is about a decade old... Maybe now we are beginning to think more about existential philosophy... we sure could use it as a basic answer for a lot of questions... That people still don't ask actually. So yeah, no existentialism; just barbarians eating turds.
@thenorthernspinozist3973 жыл бұрын
What a pity this video is very poorly organized.
@1707more10 жыл бұрын
! WAS READ SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR IN 1970, I ADMIRED HER, BUT NOT FOR THE BOOK SECOND SEX BECAUSE I WAS AND STILL TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH HER, WITH ALL SHE WROTE IN THAT BOOK. RIGHT MAN IN THE RIGHT MOMENT ALWAYS HAPPENS. AND HAPPENS WITH SIMONE. WHY? SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS THERE, BEFORE AND AFTER SECOND WORLD WAR, SHE WAS RIGHT AT THAT TIME, THAT EXPLAINS WHY SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR WAS "EXTRAORDINARY " IN HER BOOK THE SECOND SEX. SURREALISM, ETC ETC NOW IS WRONG. SINCE THE BEGINNING DNA AND HORMONES DETERMINE GIRLS, AND BOYS , NO SOCIETY. SHE WAS AN EXTRAORDINAIRE WRITER, SHE SIMPLE WANTED TO SAY WITH EXTREAMLY DETAILS EVERY THING, ALL !!! AND IT WAS GREAT, AND NOW THANK YOU MISS SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR
@1707more9 жыл бұрын
+oblong lol ok
@arnoldkitredge939311 жыл бұрын
Where was this lecture? The comedy club? Or was he lecturing to hyenas? He gets more laughs than Dane Cook. Completely subverts the entire video for me. I was looking for something intellectual, but it turns into some kind of weird chuckle fest. Good to know that philosophy sucks at other colleges as much as it does at mine.
@7bigapple5 жыл бұрын
why are these ppl laughing? they are oblivious to the actual words and ideas he's relating.