Thank you so much!! The lay terms used helped me to understand what the concept is and I think I may just pass this test. Thank you so much!!!
@kayodeogunrinde73802 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for simplifying this man. Bless you.
@WrathofMath2 жыл бұрын
Glad to help!
@azizhani333 жыл бұрын
There are a few things you can change in the video description: The first De Morgan law states the equivalent of not p and q. That is, not (p and q). This is equal to not p and not q {edit: not p or not q}. The second Morgan's law is not p or q, that is not (p or q). This is equivalent to not p or not q {edit: not p and not q}. ... Secondly, the complement of (A union B) is the complement of A union the complement of B {edit: complement of A intersect the complement of B}.
@davitsimonyan272 ай бұрын
Thank you, sir
@WrathofMath2 ай бұрын
Most welcome!
@ActuallySpanky5 ай бұрын
Is this going to help me grasp a deeper understanding of dantes' takes?
@primaldruidry3 ай бұрын
Thank you for making this simple, all the classes I've taken make it unnecessarily hard to grasp
@WrathofMath3 ай бұрын
Glad to help, thanks for watching!
@mariellejenerossvelascoric3074 Жыл бұрын
explain me where does this A intersect B came from???
@azizhani333 жыл бұрын
Is complement of A equivalent to NOT A?
@ChalaGirma-e2v10 ай бұрын
Thanks
@WrathofMath10 ай бұрын
No problem!
@christinasholars1235 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help. My math question I wanted to double check on after watching your video is, When using DeMorgan's Laws for this equation ~(pv~q) when I solve it does it become ~p^q?
@WrathofMath5 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome, thank you for watching! That is right! To negate the or statement P v ~Q, you need the statement that makes it false. That would be ~P ^ Q, because that makes both components of the or statement false, which makes the whole statement false, and so it is the negation. Does that make sense? Let me know if you ever have any video requests!