I just picked up IC today and read the first couple of chapters. It seems like an interesting and important book in many ways, but the thing that I find sort of difficult and troubling is the question - which is not really Anderson's, but possibly C. Wright Millls', on how issues of national character, or maybe historical and economic problems - things like globalization's effects on the American middle class - feed into or influence personal identities and self-perceptions. Things like nationhood, the nation, our national "inheritance" as Americans - according to the MAGA Republicans - were alluded to again and again outside of any real conversation about how all of these things had been eroded over decades, and could not simply be 'turned around' by Donald Trump, or anyone else. All of this kind of hit home for me when I read in the first chapter, where Anderson refers to another scholar of nationalism named Nairn, who says that nationalism is kind of like personal neurosis writ large, or something like infantilism. Thanks much for this intro to the book, which I hope to finish reading soon.
@I_I_I_I_I_I_I Жыл бұрын
Have an exam in 23 hours! Thank you🙌🏻
@giraykalkan84746 ай бұрын
The things he described seemed so abstract that I had nothing left in my mind after reading the book. And it will be probably the same after this video. Thanks anyway.
@mybiggrin2 ай бұрын
Most difficult literature I've ever read. I've never hated something so much lol
@aristocratic2 ай бұрын
I think that's entirely the point of conceiving of nationality and nationhood. The 'imagined' part is the abstraction involved in trying to understand why millions of people can be bound together. It remains in the abstract but that doesn't make it any less real.
@AlexCebuАй бұрын
"Common language, common law, common government, and common police and law enforcement are not imaginary concepts. This is the issue with the book: the author attempts to find imagination where real forces are at work. That’s why, when listening to or reading this book, there are moments of disconnect in understanding. For example, the author likely views language as something entirely imaginary, whereas I see language as a purely physical, physiological, energetic, and neurological product."
@alexsidney4796 Жыл бұрын
Massumi and Dean's First and Last Emperors nails this process using the over coding of the first Chinese state as example.
@Bellaaaa6982 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video!!, it help me a lot with my history essay
@Betmas22 жыл бұрын
Would you please do a video about Marc auge places and non-places.
@iwidela2 жыл бұрын
seconded!
@klarabijleveld804710 ай бұрын
Love the teddy bear
@jubabiee22 Жыл бұрын
Well explained
@ceesjanmol Жыл бұрын
How can you talk about this book without mentioning Indonesia and the radio?
@xorotorox40343 ай бұрын
Good job ❤
@nyazsalh52202 жыл бұрын
Thanks David 🙏 please make reviews about wittgenstein‘s books.
@stevie7666 Жыл бұрын
Really helpful, thank you!!
@psikeyhackr69142 жыл бұрын
Voyage from Yesteryear by James P Hogan
@tuvavetrhus4361 Жыл бұрын
whos the artist behind the tapestry?:)
@eclecticapoetica6 ай бұрын
Thanks
@TheoryPhilosophy5 ай бұрын
Thank YOU!
@jinugv6369 Жыл бұрын
Thank u easily understandable!!❤u
@jasleenkaur9252 жыл бұрын
I request you to make a video on hauntology and spectrality.
@aceous99 Жыл бұрын
Nationalism, the last refuge of scoundrel? - Samuel Pepys?
@jinugv6369 Жыл бұрын
politics ,isn't it?
@norhabibara9418 Жыл бұрын
I dont actually understand. You talk too much
@dominique-valois Жыл бұрын
Non-native speaker of English?
@bellhooked824210 ай бұрын
@@dominique-valoisracist?
@JK-nv4gu10 күн бұрын
It's a very reasonable assumption based on the comment.
@madzen112 Жыл бұрын
Never have such a shallow concept reached such a wide academic audience & been applied so poorly.