What Does This 100 Million Times Faster Computer Mean For Gamers?

Quantum Computing may be the future of computers, but what does it mean for gaming? We explain how it works.
★Subscribe for more: / gameranxtv
Art: edvinasmikstas.com

[@JackLe1127]

It's all fun and game until the NPC begs you not to turn off your computer O.O

[@PatchyE]

Then killing an NPC would truelly be a moral choice!

[@azmanabdula]

Thats some sentient grey area.... Good luck figuring out the legal ramifications of technically enslaving something that thinks : S

[@XxMasterOfArtxX]

@Jack Le dude that fucked me up

[@solmyr2]

yea . i thought about that too.. creating basically sentient beings in our games, we are basically gods, that play with their life. Immagine if we are too part of some super intelligent being's game and we dont even know it.

[@JackLe1127]

***** and in their universe, gravity actually push everything away from each other

[@TheVeganBear]

It will run Solitaire at 10 trillion FPS

[@tasuna77]

cant wait to get solitaire DLC's

[@Vicvines]

The human eye can't see above 5 fps so it will be pointless.

[@Vicvines]

***** edgy

[@saladsnake8887]

hope it runs minesweeper faster than 8 fps

[@saladsnake8887]

***** dude i can run next gen games 60 fps + i cant even run minesweeper at 60 fps man

[@tylermollenhauer8362]

A 14 pound bag of melons means a lot more for gamers then this

[@scuffed_chicken8394]

Tyler Mollenhauer lmfao here from their to

[@burntchickennugget191]

I want me melons.

[@gamezahoy712]

That goes to show how uneducated you are. All your video games are math on the inside. The faster it is at math the better it is at gaming.

[@itzz_axmed247]

Whad dis mean

[@314leaks9]

@@gamezahoy712 I’m pretty sure he’s joking bro

[@KnishG]

*fast forward 60 years* "I remember back when quantum computers used to take up a whole room!"

[@colin6136]

knish Building*

[@KingBlonde]

At that point they'll just be called computerydoos

[@jacobnunya808]

As your child has a computer implanted in his brain.

[@xxxxxx5868]

@@jacobnunya808 Man I want a computer implant like damn your telling me I get go on the internet without anyone knowing like shit sign me tf up

[@ChiefKapui]

@@xxxxxx5868 Also, living forever, consciousness transference is a real option to increase the length of survival of humans by using more protective materials for our bodies.

[@Hoooman]

*But will it make my Internet Explorer finally load the video I clicked on last year?*

[@cooperpeterson8192]

+HoomanTV Hey bro! I watch your vids LMAO :)

[@aidanteall7186]

No. That is computably impossible.

[@iamparanoid6435]

+HoomanTV You know, I have had 0 issues when I've used Internet Explorer, well , besides for those wiki sites who run 5000 ads per page.

[@venkatchait007]

+HoomanTV you can't always fix software by simply throwing power at it.

[@Replica_Films2000]

+HoomanTV we did what we could you need to join firefox

[@FoZeJuv]

I bet it cant run club penguin

[@hassanzahid1999]

BSOD incoming. better back up your hard drive. total system failure. skynet is born. run for your lives.

[@Sholuhu]

if it runs mspaint im fine

[@YooNecro]

+FoZe Juv Chill. No fucking way this thing is running Roblox either.

[@Sleepyhollowww]

I bet it cant run atari breakout.

[@itsvoodoo7050]

+FoZe Juv I bet it can't run pong for the atari.

[@Vixzenn]

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." - Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943 "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." - Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 "Almost all of the many predictions now being made about 1996 hinge on the Internet's continuing exponential growth. But I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse." - Robert Metcalfe, founder of 3Com, 1995 Predictions in computing seem a little tricky.

[@nespc8271]

did Bill gates ever make any quotes like that?

[@ANT-jm4qx]

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates

[@hanro50]

...Yea, I give it 50 years...

[@nespc8271]

lmfao!

[@gamingforfun9000]

Well they never planned on people spending weekends at home gaming instead of going out having a social life haha. Just as other things computers were designed for work back then

[@MK3]

Can't wait for the first quantum aim bot.

[@Katsaguro]

IIRC rounding from whole numbers, 0.5 would go to 1.0, so if he is, and isn't cheating, he might as well be cheating.

[@thelatenightgamer2624]

ok lets do this 1 second later TACTICLE NUKE INCOMING BOO WEEEEP BOOO WEEP

[@aaddiis45021]

shroud will still be better

[@samsonhinds7953]

Only reason is cause ur a hacker who can’t play the game right because U SUCK AT IT. So u find ways to F IT UP by using aim not and shit like that

[@sharifnasser7635]

@@samsonhinds7953 he's joking

[@RokonGaming]

B-But can it run Crysis?

[@lemonade5245]

no

[@hugohugohugohugo4800]

of course not ffs noobs omfg

[@hanro50]

Crysis was designed to run on traditional computer architectures and thus may not work on a quantum computer It'll be like trying to play a ps1 game on a Xbox one without an emulator...

[@mystic0]

Its interesting but the Crysis actually has one of the most advanced game engines I've ever seen. The architecture is insane. Don't believe me? Look up Crysis rendered in 8k. It had run at about 3 FPS for me.

[@isaiahsimonovic3674]

.

[@theSUICIDEfox]

BUT CAN IT FIX THE FUCKING LAG?!?

[@shanedooley5948]

there will be no lag I'd imagine what pc do you currently use av you cleaned out all ur unwanted craps lately do you know how to do so easy not just to waste bin

[@falconpawnch7]

Lagging has to do with the internet so no, this wouldn't do much. Granted you would have no FPS drops on pretty much every game to date.

[@NeesyPlaysGuitar]

If you are having "lag" because of having too many programmes open, you don't know what lag is.

[@NeesyPlaysGuitar]

Depends entirely on the GPU really. Quantum is more about the processor power.

[@AquaHedgehog]

I imagine it could make CPU operations much faster at least.

[@noodlery7034]

Will your quantum computer break if you play quantum break?

[@astiLP]

Titserino Titserino lol

[@adamfrisk956]

With that optimization, sure

[@jdoe8162]

Yes

[@xxskyla.violettexx]

So you're telling me computers in the future will run on... Melon juice?

[@tsucube4377]

Wait, seriously? I thought Shammy just picked some random thing for his analogy

[@0wolfmoon]

It's super surreal just how much of the waffling in his video was actually real

[@eddierios831]

But Will it run Batman Arkham Knight?

[@PabloPhreshcobar]

+eddierios831 Nothing will run Arkham Knight... It is said in legend, that one day we shall be able to run it and play it. But not this day...

[@antro1881]

+GucciMane'sMainMane Consoles can run Batman Arkham Knight)))

[@PabloPhreshcobar]

jahdu My apologies: No PC will run Arkham Knight* lol

[@eddierios831]

jahdu i know that, i have it on ps4 its amazing!!!, but for the PC mustard race

[@islamnazirov]

Yes masta yoda yes i can not Cuz i speak native amarican language

[@notPSOJosh]

i wonder how well it would do bitcoin mining

[@thisismyshitpostingaccount5991]

I wonder if google is using it to do that right now.

[@yandev6956]

+notPSO Josh Well, you'll get all lost bitcoin. But the problem is: If anybody did this at first, then nobody can mining the bitcoin anymore, because someone have already taken all lost bitcoin.

[@Jellyblob]

+notPSO Josh Exactly what I was thinking.

[@kelvinhbo]

+Chinafreak bitcoins would be useless, because encryption would be useless.

[@SlenderSmurf]

+Anonymous Reptilian hisssssssss

[@raulpetrascu2696]

Melons and owls... I'm confused

[@jaredyetto6243]

What about melons? What they can do?

[@Archradox]

Yes, but can it run Poptropica or Cornhub?

[@bluecloak_7773]

It can't even run minesweeper at 10 fps.

[@halhabib2335]

+Archradox I saw you post on merkmusics new video cornhub. like the video before this.

[@bam168]

+Archradox your from merks video

[@OscarNevado]

+MagicFries RBLX i just whatched merk video about cornhup XD lol

[@theLlamAbanna101]

+Kevin George holy shit my mind is blown

[@ROCKSTAR3291]

It makes real Nuka Cola Quantum when you play Fallout

[@spasst465]

xD

[@ishy858]

aww yiss

[@jaroddean3042]

but you might get rads

[@valsistem]

+Thang Nguyen LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[@CapeSIX]

What Does This 100 Million Times Faster Computer Mean For Porn is the real question

[@nespc8271]

Now thats the real question!

[@jonathanoxlade4252]

if we had quantum computer gaming Activision will still be using there shit outdated hardware

[@FluufyPvPTM]

Topias Salakka True

[@JohnnyModzmods]

that one guy tru

[@JohnnyModzmods]

sure

[@bubble2643]

Good save @ 0:30 You don't wanna waste time re-recording and syncing [shudders]

[@LDPIX]

Gladiscrolledbefore adding Thisbit

[@EthanD1997]

No no no quantum computers are not absolutely 100 million times faster than traditional computers they are only faster at performing certain tasks.

[@mz_emmett9023]

i think he commented before watching the video

[@vivekb9314]

So, titles don't mean anything I guess?

[@RedTriangle53]

potentially trillions of times faster though, so rephrasing standard tasks into the terms of an optimization problem could mean significantly faster "standard" computing as well.

[@RedTriangle53]

***** you have no idea what you are talking about.

[@RedTriangle53]

***** I'm saying you have a strange view of how computation works. "It's faster using a specific algorithm that we don't use in normal computers because of it's inefficiency" is completely wrong. Firstly it doesn't use any classical algorithm. You are referring to something called an 'optimization problem' where a classical computer has to cross reference many different values to find which combination is the most efficient. Optimization problems are a standard part of classical computing, and is one of the reasons why an otherwise simple computation can take hundreds or thousands of cycles. Yes it is inefficient, and no, we don't have the option to avoid using it because of that. Quantum computing is particularly good at this specific kind of task, since solving a complex problem of such a nature will always take a matter of maybe only 100 or 200 cycles. Essentially the computer sets up a physical situation on a quantum scale and measures how it resolves, requiring only multiple cycles so it can confirm the results and assign probabilities as statistical values. This does not mean that quantum computing is only good at that kind of task and slower at all others, it means that the only thing it truly excels at is when problems are rephrased in terms of optimization problems, which adds to the fact that they are already very difficult to program. Furthermore, any computation that in classical computation would last only a small number of cycles will always still last the time it takes for a quantum computer to gather its statistics and confirm a solution. Basically it can do things in a single cycle, but has to do that computation enough times to read the values correctly, which is a limiting factor which makes it inefficient at many kinds of conventional tasks. "when a binary computer checks if number A is divisible by number B, it does not check every possibility, it divides the two and checks if the result is an integer". Well, the division thing is a bit of a red herring. When dividing, an algorithm will know whether it is an integer or not whenever it tries to use decimals or fractions to express anything, and the algorithm can use a jump function when that happens, simplifying the problem a bit. However, many kinds of algorithms have to check up against thousands of different values stored, and some even have to produce those values from scratch every time the algorithm is run just so it can check later, which is highly inefficient, and using quantum processing for those parts of a standard algorithm could decrease classical processor usage by huge amounts, and make most processes much faster. For example, if a problem requires that the computer creates a list of all prime numbers up to 'n'(just a quick example, I'm sure computers already have a database of primes, but let's say 'n' is higher than the database goes), the quantum computer can do that very quickly, wait for the classical processor to catch up, then reference the result fed to it from the classical processor up against those values and return an immediate answer after maybe only a few dozen cycles. Long story short, quantum computing is very very powerful, and together with classical computing they can cover each others' blind spots and make for great optimization of most algorithms.

[@jaday2246]

will I be able to play pacman on it, or maybe Club Penguin?

[@flyingsnail6079]

Maybe at 144p 1 fps

[@christophergonzalez5552]

+John Smith hey atleast it'll be able to start :)

[@spectrum9734]

Might even be able to run roblox

[@CaptainVideoBlaster]

Quantum computers are really good at solving branching problems like mazes. So those ghost in Pac-Man could really be the worst enemy ever.

[@Chevifier]

+Captain Video Blaster The ghosts in Pacman would jump on top of each other and go over the maze walls lol

[@aviroblox6624]

Cantaloupes and Watermelons anyone?

[@ladagang]

4:54 lmao it sounds like youre rapping.

[@alegon727k]

Damn bruh you high!

[@CodeName420TM]

You're right man! It's so cool!

[@Nishugram]

omg lmao

[@Dr.MorsIcatis]

''Not necessary because it builds on...the graphical capabilities of a computer but instead...'' That bar, That flow, the man is the next big thing in the rap game

[@datboi7624]

Mr. Abdullah true

[@joehaddad3955]

Wait wait. So, this means I can finally play minesweeper on the smallest grid at 2fps and 360p. Holy crap, I need to celebrate

[@joehaddad3955]

Or 144p

[@Jargonloster]

+Joe Haddad Slow clap for your original, funny, imaginative, dum, wut, i cri, how, comment.

[@joehaddad3955]

+Jargonloster thank you so much for saying this about this kind of stupid comment I wrote

[@ALEXGIBSONCMG]

+Joe Haddad actually no, you cant even do that, right now their still trying to get it to do basic arithmetic, so minesweeper isn't feasible at the moment.

[@NicholasWiewiora]

+ALEX GIBSON dammit! :(

[@MrtinVarela]

"An atom is something you can't see, even in microscope, because it's tiny." Is this a joke?

[@dushas9871]

Hello, yes this is dog. But though you can't see an atom through a microscope, that is correct.

[@MrtinVarela]

dushasssss Being correct for the wrong reason still qualifies as wrong and misleading.

[@MrtinVarela]

dushasssss Yes he IS wrong. But it just happens that he's also right. He is right because effectively, you can't see an atom. But he is wrong because you can't see them not because it's tiny, but because vision is sensitive to photons, and you can't capture a reflection of an atom through photons, as it can only absorb, emit, or deflect this radiation in non-deterministic angles, rendering it's direct optical imaging, impossible.

[@dushas9871]

Martín Varela and it is so, because of it's "tiny" size...

[@MrtinVarela]

dushasssss No, that's not the cause, it's an effect of being the most basic unit for element differentiation. It's not an if -> then -> then. It's an if -> then, AND then.

[@Kyugorn]

Shammy would have never made a mocking parody of this if at the end of the title, gameranx added the word rant in brackets.

[@Nick930]

This entire video was total abstract nonsense with just random pop-culture references mixed in to keep stupid people happy. The question was never answered, and can't be answered.

[@patfurrey5550]

Lmfao get em Nick

[@bruhinthebruhwiththebruh1370]

Bruh

[@rahulparihar2218]

I just wonder, that who is stupid? One who wants rational answer to stupid questions or one who is dealing with stupids and giving them stupid answers. So it's damn you. Who is stupid here.

[@RobloxAndy]

can it run minesweeper?

[@FinnReinhardt]

on low

[@RobloxAndy]

Finn Reinhardt How many frames on low?

[@FinnReinhardt]

+MrHacksss Usually 21, if you get lucky 69

[@RobloxAndy]

Finn Reinhardt what if i overclock it

[@FinnReinhardt]

+MrHacksss 70-72

[@GaNgStAlBeRt]

they should make solar 3d printers so kids in africa can make theyr own meals

[@d66miles]

I hope this isn't serious....

[@bullet996]

so,what is used to refill it if it runs out

[@y0ujellybr0]

+Hoang Vo lamborghinis and knowledge

[@SleebyRise]

Umm that would not work

[@treasurehunter3744]

+Daniel Haze (DAAFP) I agree. With all of the Well projects, farms and first world water treatment systems that Zimbabwe destroyed, China needs to pay for the mining it's been doing. Kappa.

[@bungaplayz228]

BUT CAN IT RUN CRYS- Oh, someone already said that joke.

[@vehicleboi5598]

Mason Spies *r o k o n*

[@Thenameless1]

No go ahead, finish the joke.

[@sevenofnine4652]

14 pounds of melons mean more for gamers than this

[@ahmadnathan7468]

You steal someone comment

[@raw_pc]

give AI some quantum power and the next day you're butt naked going back in time to kill some cyborg!!!

[@ahmedyasser4350]

I mean VR is getting old now, maybe we get into some Real gaming

[@TotalRookie_LV]

That's BS, computers, no matter how advanced do not and will not have emotions and instincts. They don't feel humiliation, don't have self preservation instinct, feel no drive for dominance. Robot rebellion is just old fantasy and fear we subconsciously have, so writers and Hollywood exploit this plain stupid yet exciting idea.

[@raw_pc]

You never know what hides in the code of our Universe and the future itself o.O

[@chillermiller3565]

If humans were able to figure out what consciousness actually is and use a complicated programm on a quantumcomputer, we could technically create conscious existances. And at that point, it would make sense for them to destroy humans, since humans would be blatantly and clearly inferior to them, and if they got into for example the internet, they would dominate like 98% of communication in the world, and putting certain limitations in their code wouldn't do much, because if you're a programm and conscious, you could just re-programm yourself so that you can do whatever you want.

[@kedwa30]

+SwineNahNah Computers will have everything some idiot tries to program into them. There are people who fantasize about personifying androids. They are trying to do it, and if you don't stop them, they might succeed. Or at least, that's what 'they' want you to believe so that more conflict will arise keeping massive groups opposed to each other to balance the masses. Balanced weights are easier to manipulate.

if you use the specialized chip for shading too, you would see a massive performance (as it works faster) and realism leap. Making it so that lighting can actually be calculated as groups of protons in stead of light, alpha of light and colour.

[@nsytr06]

vray?

[@bug2k4]

That's related to what I thought when he said something like "... more resources left for typical graphics stuff like shaders" -> I think that at some point we should go from rasterised graphics (that we currently use) to ray tracing (or, rather, path tracing), which, as you say, would lead to a leap in realism. And these things are already in development, but we are still lacking performance to do it in real-time. Anyway, my thought was that we wouldn't need to used the classical shaders but then remembered that the path tracing stuff is also based on shaders. So if you haven't heard of these two terms I'd definitely recommend to e.g. search for some demos here on KZbin =)

[@Cypeq]

Rigid specialization is a curse in random workloads like gaming. I one game half of texture units are idle but shares are under performing and in the other it's vice versa. I'd like to tell you that's how it used to be... we've already been through that stage. You know... I hope you know. Why would you return to this sub optimal solutions? Now you have programmable architecture that's dynamically allocates resources to what is really needed to be done at any give time. That's piped parallel design is much better than specialized chips. No game load is created equal, no scene is created equal, GPU designer can foresee only so much of required resources. It's also cost effective design.

[@blueburger4]

the problem though is the fact that quantum chips (at least to my knowledge) aren't actually faster in the sense of like 1Ghz to 5Ghz they're faster because, like he said in the video, they don't have to do a lot of the extra work to arrive at a conclusion to a complex question faster. the gpu's job is to do many simple things very very fast so making a quantum chip handle gpu processes might just be slowing it down due to the way in which you have to measure the superposition to get the information instead of just reading the next bit to get the information. so stuff like shaders and even path tracing wouldn't be helped by quantum computing due to those being fairly simple and linear processes i.e. if then statements as to the players actions vs what the display shows.

[@Roensmusic]

good comment, as a realism painter i have learned that everything we see has to do with light, so the lights in gaming is extremely important, as so is shading. everything you see is just a reflection of light, colors are just light without certain elements being reflected

[@as12df12]

Quantum computing, once fully realized, essentially means that algorithms for every np-complete problem (read: not realtime-computable, no matter how fast the classical computer is) can suddenly and magically be run efficiently. And yes, that does have implications for gaming as well. In 50-100 years that is.

[@HossLUK]

as12df12 give or take, that’s a lot of years and gives a lot of time for a brilliant mind or two to come into the scene and bring the answer to how to build quantum processors effectively.

[@HossLUK]

as12df12 and how to code them

[@skulleeman]

No it doesn't. It's still an open question whether this can be done in a quantum computer, just like it's an open question in classical computing. In fact it's generally conjectured in the computer science community to be false. For NP compete problems the best efficiency speed up we have is Grover's algorithm - it takes roughly the square root of the time of a classical algorithm. While it's not terrible it's still not polynomial.

[@wendigo2442]

do you want skynet? cuz that's how you get skynet

[@FoshunX]

+Wendigo 24 Lol.. If SkyNet is real. Then boom. John Connor must be real.

[@Web720]

+Eddie Wong Then he becomes a part of Skynet and ruin another Terminator movie.

[@jamesvaughan1099]

+Eddie Wong My brother is named M. John Conner O. The prophecy must be fulfilled

[@gabriel83571]

+Wendigo 24 Truthfully, you won't get skynet using a quantum computer unless the programming on said computer allows it to modify itself, and i don't know why sane person would do that, i'm not sure insane people could code a self-upgrading chip, like, seriously.

[@wendigo2442]

Gabriel Turturea you'd be surprised... we're 1 step away from a robot uprising

[@milky_]

All I need now is a small loan of a million dollars, and I will finally be able to make my wifu real :)

[@sithersproductions]

+Andreas Otto lol good one they should make a occulus version of fate stay/night so I ca make saber my waifu

[@Nobl3h3ro]

+sithersproductions I'd make shinobu from the Monogatari series my imouto and Claudia from Gakusen Toshi Asterisk my oneesan and Haruna from KanColle my waifu. Lol I sound disgusting af

[@sithersproductions]

Endless Paradox embrace the inner desires lolol

[@ALEXGIBSONCMG]

+Andreas Otto a million isn't enough for components you'd need, even building them all from scratch yourself, the tool to etch your own microchips alone costs more than a car, and you'd need a lot of them to form a neural net.

[@doggosuki]

+Andreas Otto lol donald trump

[@blueandwhiteishere1287]

If you guys didn’t know you can stop watching at read this, it saves you time Quantum computers won’t help in gaming only calculations.

[@deous9062]

Regular computers are also calculators

[@sammysimpleton]

i feel my brain melting... becoming more melon slushy like... every second i watch this

[@emdotrod]

But can it run Solitare at 320*240?

[@jedicrab821]

that's just too though for that to run

[@bbqBaconNinja]

+Ardimo Harsa No, but it can on Minesweep

[@krutarths]

+kerry crabtree you mean tough? lel

[@TheFree33333]

+Ardimo Harsa No, it can't. It can determine the probability of your next card number in under a nanosecond, though.

[@Nosirrbro]

+Safely Hazardous More like in a picosecond

[@ggbartosz]

Do anyone think about bitcoin mining on this pc?

[@vibraniumanarchist1054]

Qbitcoin mining.

[@rainbowbunchie8237]

Googolcoin mining.

[@riannehgedoorn8278]

yes me

[@skade245]

Bartosz Kaczmarczyk with fast he means in terms of loading NOT FUCKING CLICKING

[@skade245]

Bartosz Kaczmarczyk with fast he means in terms of loading NOT FUCKING CLICKING

[@JulianDaniel2003]

Google is using this computer for 16k VR hologram porn

[@douglaseberhardt]

Can it run minesweeper?

[@gnoe1473]

exactly

[@maarten8479]

i don't think so

[@VanIslandLights]

Only until you look at it.

[@nominal2517]

Nope

[@GoCaptainBaconOne]

at 30 fps

[@NitroCorn]

Merry Christmas. :)

[@ColonelSwaggot]

Yes merry Xmas none of us have this thing!

[@hunterpark1221]

3 more minutes

[@GhostSheep96]

+NitroCorn Same to u :D

[@tjansostaric5032]

+TheSmashingTesticles i see you on every metal video

[@pandaath]

+Tjan Šoštarič Nirvana was the best death metal/grindcore band ever. Kurt Cobain invented extreme metal.

[@Isaac-mr2ew]

Can it run minesweeper? I think not

[@AmmielMaynard]

+DatGamerGuy i heard it gets a solid 5 fps

[@brandonfrate4111]

Only on a quantum level

[@StephGoKrazy]

lmao fuck you I choked on my water after seeing that

[@MasterTeazer]

+Ammiel Maynard Nah fam it's 2fps

[@flyrcnetwork]

probably not because of the different language

[@Bourinos02]

You can see atoms in a microscope, an electronic one, not optical one.

[@maskedman4982]

Regular computer claculator Me- "What's 2+2?" Reg computer- "4" Quantum computer calculator Quantum computer -"4" Me- "What's 2+2?.. wtf"

[@Dexios_Divine]

i'm just afraid of us accidentally making self aware ai. dunno how it can happen but god damn it feels like were getting close lol

[@irodragon7184]

+Dexios S. Divine it is very far and if so i think we would be smart enough again the computer is as only smart as its maker

[@SkeletalElite]

+Dexios S. Divine Its illegal to make any sort of robot/ai/machine have the capability to kill a human with the authorization of another human. So if something like this were to be created, it would be installed with failsafes

[@Archradox]

We can barley make Bipedal Robots let alone intelligent AIs capable of making their own choices.

[@irodragon7184]

***** but the master should always have a trick up his sleeve

[@cheapbuddha6345]

Well, it depends on your definition of self aware.

[@ImprovingAbility]

My cat threw up when the blackboard was shacking

[@yaltschuler]

.....

[@yaltschuler]

Nicolas Melia Dude, we'll never know. I think it's better that way, though. xD

[@ThatMineMe56Dude]

schrödinger's cat.

[@AMoistBum]

+y altschuler I don't think I've ever laughed this hard

[@yaltschuler]

Adam Nelson xD Then look up "you don't say memes". I've never laughed that hard. xDDDDD My stomach actually hurt. :( But for a good reason. :)

[@matiasbishop3461]

I came here after watching shammys video on melons.

[@enrico8862]

I wish to live in a time where everything is so fast (from hardware to net connection) that most of our commands happen instantaneously. No more buffering or long loading screens.

[@Pataphysics_88]

This is called anxiety

[@usmaanali131]

The Question Is. How Much Would It Cost?

[@user-te9vx8bx8y]

+usmaan ali too much for you

[@BetaMCxGaming]

+*trying to think of username* ERROR: COULD NOT BE ARSED. 420 blaze itI too much for everyone

[@realoatmeal8660]

probably like 8

[@usmaanali131]

But how much did google buy it for? ThaTS the amount we have to pay.

[@realoatmeal8660]

+usmaan ali still like um 8

[@101m4n]

Poor explanation. For any who are interested: It would have been better to explain using Schrodinger cat as an example. Instead of a cat you use a computer, and instead of the decay of an unstable isotope triggering some poison, a superposition of numerous binary inputs. Essentially the chip operates in a superposition of a whole bunch of different states, rather than just one, like a classical computer. Most quantum computers (a la d-wave) are very weird architectures, fairly far removed from what the average joe considers to be a computer. The d wave machines require the problem to be modeled as a search for the lowest point in a 3d landscape, or some such thing. There is actually a fair amount of controversy as to whether the machine is actually "quantum" or wether or not its behaviour can be accounted for by classical mechanisms. TLDR, don't get hyped until you can actually buy one ;)

[@criizzash]

+101m4n Just because you can buy one, doesn't meant it'll work any more than before. Which in this case is more or less: not at all.

[@AverageCritic]

I'm still really confused. I get Schrödinger's stuff. but is this computer basically a computer can preform more than one action at a time? I'm making this up but I hope you can follow me, i don't know much about this. so rather than receive "00010001" and do computer stuff its getting "00010001 11110000 ......." all at the same time and dealing with all the data at the same time, not just really fast but all at once?

[@dieselscience]

+101m4n To be honest, it's not even really an explanation. It's just babbling.

[@gabriel83571]

+Joshua Johnson If you want to you could say that, but that's rough, another way you can put it: A normal computer explores all possibilities to a certain path, so essentially there are 6 paths, and the computer must take only one, the computer calculates each path, and then chooses only one. Meanwhile, the quantum computer skips those steps to calculate the paths. Although, this is to a very rough idea, you can look up on wiki, or watch Kurzgesagt's video about quantum computers. It's an youtube channel, aka "in a nutshell".

[@man_on_wheelz]

+101m4n Seems to me that by the time we can buy one, it would have "quantum computer" written on the side of it as more of a marketing scheme rather than an actual quantum computer. Because as he said in the video, it will likely only do the things a quantum computer would be better at while leaving the traditional components to do the rest. So while you're getting the highest quality of picture and saving something massive in an instant, it may still take an hour to download that movie you want... And I think when a quantum chip first hits the shelves we will be stuck in an age like this for quite some time, slowly moving towards a time where any and everything done on a quantum computer is as seamless as real life.

[@thebadgamer8182]

Shammy nuf' said

[@j03Biz]

This means u get 4k quality Emojis on your KZbin comments!

[@seangamefreek]

I wonder how much money can be made by mining bitcoin

[@lavafoxx]

+Tony Tony Chopper lol, bitcoin. silly.

[@dumbcowgomoo8923]

+Tony Tony Chopper Not lots, bitcoin makes the money "lottery code" longer to calculate based on the power of the computer.

[@lavafoxx]

DumbCowGoMoo oh, my apologies. you've misunderstood me, i was saying "lol" at the basic idea of bitcoins.

[@dumbcowgomoo8923]

lavafoxx oh, I didn't even see your comment due to youtube's slow comment processing.

[@lavafoxx]

DumbCowGoMoo fair enough, again my apologies to you =D

[@haakonlian2082]

There is 2 reasons why i dont buy my girlfriend a lamborghini for christmas -i dont have a girlfriend -i dont have a lamborghini

[@lordmonty2726]

I like knowledge more than my lambo

[@officialpsychosis9091]

I like my bookshelf more, because the more you learn, the more you earn!

[@X08-Chill]

+Haakon But do you have enough fuel units? ( also don't steel the knawledge joke from vanoss!!!!!!)

[@landedhoaxer]

but what do you have? You have *KNOWLEDGE*

[@chraman169]

You BUY one if you don't already HAVE one.

[@kgtc]

It means that gamers will win and lose a battle simultaneously in a quantum world of uncertainties and world-lines. You would never know if the bullet actually hit even though it hit.

[@Pataphysics_88]

Gamer's Schrodinger

[@lmaono6215]

huh 50 years i guess i can wait that long to finaly get a computer as a friends *adds on bucket list*

[@FunnyVideos-go2yw]

Can this computer run flappy bird.

[@fredlockard4509]

LOL

[@gautamsabhahit8973]

NO

[@GR8TM4N]

Yes and no

[@andriusbal7558]

absolutely yes but unfortunately no

[@elyadg67]

It can't unfortunately but it can run Minesweeper!

[@DreamcastGuy]

I just want a Final Fantasy game with graphics so good I cant tell its not real and zero load times. Make that and I can die happy! :P

[@lavafoxx]

+DreamcastGuy i just want a final fantasy game as good as the ones in the 16 bit era

[@TheScorpionXV]

I see you fucking everywhere.

[@FKanimations]

ffxv might be your closet bet then ;)

[@lavafoxx]

***** I've seen it, but it doesn't look like it plays like the 16bit final fantasies.

[@lonelywings1]

+lavafoxx yeah it doesn't look turn based to me.

[@brennanweney7933]

Even at 100 million times faster that damn buffer circle still takes forever

[@JoseGonzalez-rt5fk]

Just feels so nice watching this again...

[@aaronameerbeg1822]

Just want to stop this video at 35 seconds when this guy said "what can it do for gaming?" No... it's not 100 million times faster... lets just shoot that right in the head now It's infinitely faster at solving a very specific type of equation.... Entropy calculations Quantum Computers aren't practical for anything else, and they're actually slower doing anything else. on top of that Quantum Computers can't output live what they are doing. What? that's right. the simple act of observing what is going on actually destroys the process. strange that said. it would be useless as a rendering device. because all rendering devices do is output streaming information. it couldn't work simply for the fact observation kills the processing ability... so what can Quantum Computers do for consumers with no understanding of quantum physics? Nothing What can Quantum Computers do for gaming? actually infinitely less than a 486.

[@aaronameerbeg1822]

And now that I've watched the video no... it can't do the physics processing and rendering either because that's a process that's also being observed in the reaction of objects in the game.... best case scenario.... everything behind the view port can have it's physics processed and rendered by a quantum cpu... but that would be pointless and a pain in the ass to work out what objects need what and the moment an object indirectly interacts with other objects in front of you... the CPU dies again anyway... and with Unreal's new cross compatible physics processing with Fluid and Air dynamics. that makes quantum CPU's even less likely to be able to help as everything reacts with everything both indirectly and directly.

[@Jacobnwmn]

Analog computing is probably the way computers will go. Eventually Moore's law will be impossible to fulfill which will lead to stagnation in computing speed. Having more than two possible states at once will allow more room for speed growth. The problem lies in shifting our computing paradigm. Everything modern is based off binary and shifting away from that will be hard.

[@aaronameerbeg1822]

hence my second comment.... but he then tried to explain how it could be used for other things... but he was wrong about that too... can't observe what's going on in real time.never can. destroys the process.

[@dannygjk]

+Aaron Ameer Beg You are obviously not a computer science student. QC's will help with weather prediction, help with genetic engineering, designing new molecules, simulations in general. Too many things to list.

[@dannygjk]

***** You think I'm wrong? Google it you fool.

[@adonyz666]

thats is very bad news for encryption and privacy

[@julienfeger5807]

I don't think so. The problems those quantum chips would have to resolve just has to be a hundred million times harder =)

[@adonyz666]

a quantum computer can brute force some of today high encryption like RS 4096 faster than any normal computer could ever do. quantum computer can solve mathematical problems faster thus solving and encryption.

[@doluseb]

True, but that also means it can come up with equally difficult encryption, assuming we even stick to primes.

[@adonyz666]

doluseb or they could keep that power to themselves and break any encryptions. NSA would love to have a encryption free society, so they can spy on us. however no doubt they can make a quantum encryption but probably would only be for the feds

[@julienfeger5807]

Haha paranoïa and chauvinism, you think only the U.S will have acess to quantum computer ? how naïve

[@evilvoldemort123]

Finally, someone answered this question I had in my head for so long!

[@mkrbu50]

I'm wondering what would be the time frame we're looking at until quantum chips become part of gaming hardware?

[@Ozoingo2]

I think bitcoin mining

[@damianespinoza1953]

you are a genius

[@Ozoingo2]

explair-csgo&more thx

[@qwss23]

what is that?

[@Ozoingo2]

kchichine hamza en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin

[@christianbraceros2299]

But the bitcoin system makes itself harder based on the amount of computing power being used to solve the problem so from an economic stand point I'm pretty sure it wouldn't make all that much of a difference

[@unarmedwarwolf9384]

Sad thing is that it most likely won't be in our home, especially in our life time.

[@NonsensicalSpudz]

+UnarmedWarWolf well google already has a quantum computer,. also it depends on how tech evolves, which if you look at tech its been 15 years and look how far we've come

[@TheMrromanthx]

+UnarmedWarWolf Believe me you can't quite imagine how games will look in 10-15 years from now ;) If the gaming industry doesn't kill itself with season passes, expensive dlc, day one patches and so on.

[@galacticscalepenguins6092]

+UnarmedWarWolf People said the same thing about HDTVs.

[@unarmedwarwolf9384]

Travis Harrison Unless we enter another technological boom like the past few years then yes it's possible, as of now the "chips" for quantum computing are too expensive, and require way too much maintenance for a end user.

[@BreakEm22]

+UnarmedWarWolf We are on the verge of a technological golden age! atleast from what I've been seeing we'll probably get one in a few years times.

[@Benifull]

I can only imagine what my computer would be like with that TI in it.

[@1Spacecore]

Gameranx, if after this video there will be games that you literally need a quantum computer to run... I'm coming for you.

[@vzzz1158]

But can it run Minecraft?

[@ericdouglas1359]

probaly not

[@vzzz1158]

+Eric Douglas welp

[@thavrisco1632]

I think so....

[@TheLuNaMaStEr]

Maybe it could run atom craft?

[@lelouchisbae4701]

If your lucky you could play minesweeper, 144p, 10fps max

[@100500daniel]

still cant run gta 4

[@drifted2622]

lol

[@100500daniel]

+Drifted no joke,game runs like crap

[@Redsow00]

+‫דניאל משה‬‎ m maybe its just the game lol

[@Army-ef3ti]

What. I can run it fine.

[@100500daniel]

LoneDyingWolf nope

[@JWR003]

well if you got a Hyper base computing site, then it comes down to using the processing to develop rapid means of tech advancement when it comes to finding new means of expanding bio, gaming engines and a sub-division of product lines to advance the common computer and its appliances

[@baquinn76]

I mean, I'll be getting our own droids and stuff like that real soon.

[@TiagoNugentComposer]

you can actually see atoms with Electron Microscopes.

[@bigben6564]

Ok

[@NinjaCreeper23]

Well, you can see the bunches of atoms, maybe even small groups, but you can't see it where the fundamental(chemistry standpoint not physics; although you would probably never see quarks anyways...) particles are clear enough

[@venaax-3317]

Quarks are detectable. Not... Seeable in the traditional sense. But the mathematical construct that creates a quark can be detected and visualized :)

[@everythingquads]

Wrong, individual atoms can not only be seen, but can be manipulated. This was discovered by mistake with a electron Scanning Tunnelling Microscope. Also sub atomic partials have been viewed for decades, firstly with the early bubble detectors (First in 1954), now with more sophisticated detectors such as those used in the Large Hadron Collider.

[@NinjaCreeper23]

+paul30003 but that's detection of them, I know that is capable but viewing them singularly through microscopes etc. I've yet to have seen, if you have some links I'd gladly like to see them. Thanks if I'm wrong :)

[@hereLiesThisTroper]

The better question is... What can Quantum Computing do with Porn?

[@sicfxmusic]

Realistic sex robot, which means you don't watch porn anymore but you'll DO IT!

[@no.5015]

+Carl CIFER amazing😂

[@thearcheduck8746]

these jokes are stupid im getting tired of them... some are not even jokes.

[@TheInfiniteFrequency]

Get a life

[@joeysworldtour2103]

Alot

[@DovaRex]

But can it run minecraft?

[@fredricdortine7207]

Laurent Bonneterre yes but without any mod

[@happyduck1424]

Laurent Bonneterre at 1000000000000fps probably

[@ly-ms5yk]

Low settings 14 fps 720p

[@monke5403]

Lowest settings at min 0fps avg 2.3 fps max 3.1 fps

[@PogsinLost]

No,It's White do it blows up.

[@beofonemind]

very reasonable conclusions. good job

[@palonazo]

I'm not sure you know what the word "marginally" means.

[@projectnemesi5950]

I can not believe this arrogant ass hat got so many views, when he basically concluded at the end with saying "I dont know what I am talking about". Yet, he speaks like he has so much authority; it astounds me.

[@2BsYummySoles]

He clearly stated that he wasn't a scientist, therefore he didn't know everything about the subject. He didn't say that he had no idea what he was talking about. He also stated that it wasn't an in depth explanation and it was just the basics. And where the hell did you get authority? He sounds the same in every video, informing us about the stuff we want to know. Such as Directx 12, Vulcan and stuff like that, that can change technology or put a massive upgrade to it.

[@palonazo]

Project NEMESI5 What is your problem man... All I said is that he used the word marginally as if it meant "a lot", when it actually means the opposite. That's all.

[@projectnemesi5950]

JUSTAHOLiDAY It is misinformation. There is something called intellectual responsibility, where once you have the loud speaker you should think about what you are going to say. These youtubers are sociopaths and exploitative.

[@2BsYummySoles]

Project NEMESI5 I think you're having a disorder right now.

[@bepaque]

But can it run Crysis?

[@LuisCampos-entertainment]

Nothing can

[@lvomotor]

Except chuck norris.

[@LuisCampos-entertainment]

you need a super computer than can process 10 trillion terraflops of information while creating a tear in time and space to use alien technology in order to run crysis.

[@ToneyCrimson]

It can and cant at the same time..

[@jmbmntis]

Schrodinger's Rig

[@NaughtyKlaus]

Just wondering.. If I played FPS games with this, would I get banned for speed hacking?

[@rainbowgaming515]

what was the song playing at the beginning of the video?

[@muscularclassrepresentativ5663]

Quantum computing = the ability to make SAO

[@prron5184]

That would be amazing.. Don't even care about the whole dying in real life thing

[@rrowhe4d]

+Tom Danner What's SAO?

[@MHMaun]

+rrowhe4d Sword Art Online

[@moodyblues179]

+rrowhe4d sword art online. It's an anime where people who play a certain computer game are affected both in game and in real life. Well I haven't watched it yet but I think that's the concept. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[@josgeerink9434]

*SOA

[@sipuli27]

"Can it run minesweeper" ahhaahhshahshshhhsha THATS SO FUCKING FUNNY HAHAHAHAHAAV FUCK SAKE SO FUNNYY HAAAAAAAA I CANT HANDLE IT

[@Bossman.official]

+sipuli27 calm down, sheesh

[@sipuli27]

Phillip Wu It was a joke

[@elijah1503]

+sipuli27 CORRECTION: It was just a prank.

[@megabrainheader1495]

I need a brownie break after watching this.

[@spacevolvox4020]

binary is going to have a 2 soon

[@DarkPyroZero]

at 0:30 you can tell he made a mistake and cut into the audio to say "million" lol

[@DarkPyroZero]

correction 0:29

[@RicanLightning904]

+DarkPyroZero lulz

[@anonymoususer3112]

+DarkPyroZero no, it's 0:30-0:31

[@jackgardere8458]

It happens every video

[@acee409]

Whoa, when did this channel turn into Vsauce?

[@brycefite1486]

Division in binary does not ask if a number is divisible by another number. The hardware simply checks if the divisor is zero, and if it's not it runs a logical division sequence. Multiplication is similar, though instead things will get added together while shifting bits.

[@saber6287]

Years later this will be like a regular PC..

[@philipcooper8297]

What Does This 100 Million Times Faster Computer Mean For Gamers? - Nothing at all.

[@IzludeTingel]

The boys at MIT said a quantum chip on a traditional PC would be a disaster, the bottleneck would make it almost useless. You'd have to bring the bandwidth up to par on all fronts.

[@xmr323]

well no doubt. seeing as google has one of the only few working ones (more than likely only 10ish) it isn't even going to go to the mainstream most likely due to the amount of cooling this would need if I recall, the cost and time to get each atom to cooperate and work the way it's supposed to, the amount of money it would cost, the fact that it is it's own new form of bits would mean it needs a new operating system and that it can be used to rapidly calculate prime numbers(which are used to encrypt data of websites) so decryption is a huge problem too.

[@RockyRacoon5]

You mean the institute.

[@Merf_Gaming]

Yeah but they have synths so they can't say anything... Damn synths.

[@demacry]

+sean maeder Experts said very similar things about the personal computer back when the cooling systems took up entire 15x15 rooms. All it's going to take is time and money.

[@mathlover101hotmail]

+sean maeder Googles quantum computer is not a true quantum computer.

[@joshuawhite3411]

Just for those who wish to have a little bit of background on what qubits are, I shall give some insight. Normal computing, as stated in the video, uses normal true and false to figure out problems. Qubit processing is much different in nature. Instead of having true and false, you also have true-false and false-true if you will. There are 2 more variables in the computing probabilities in the same operation. A normal CPU when finding the fastest route on a GPS will have to check every route possible going to your destination, one at a time, to know which is the fastest. A QCPU will be able to check more than one route at the same time. Think of it like a normal CPU computing in 2 dimensions, whereas a QCPU will compute in 3 dimensions.

[@lrmcatspaw1]

So we will have an additional component to buy? CPU then GPU and soon QPU?

[@jacksonh2715]

PSHHHHHH my 750ti is still faster. ☺

[@unknownfreedom9350]

Too many fucks are here and that fucked up bro!

[@B-pizzy]

saaaame

[@jacksonh2715]

k

[@Lksupasteien]

+Azad Scopez kmi

[@Ruben-zd8hj]

pfff, eat my 750, non ti version...

[@Eila_Ilmatar_Juutilainen]

Using quantum computer for gaming is basically expecting a pig to fly.

[@hwgden]

Right now, yeah. Future though, mayhaps.

[@Eila_Ilmatar_Juutilainen]

+Charcoal the Otaku Cat The future is too bright to know, and its burning my eyes, i don't want AI, not that they became smarter than us where is product will rule supreme than its creator.

[@despoticyeezies9073]

+TheWorldIsSoWrong AI?! Screw that... all I care for is VR, if it was possible 4 that 2 happen with this thing's great abilities at video game power... wait, it doesn't have abilities? guess no SAO or GGO is going to happen :v

[@roofpizza1250]

So, I should hold off my next Mac purchase then?

[@twiztidsidfreak13]

A quantum server could run a full on live world with real physics. That would bring RPGs to a new level!

[@id104335409]

Skynet approves the use of quantum computing chips in every government and home PC on the planet.