Wayne Jackson discusses what Christ taught about our existence after death.
Пікірлер: 35
@marylynnnix4974Ай бұрын
I have read many of his articles and appreciate his answers to Bible questions. He always gave a Bible answer to any question.I still refer to the Christian Courier many times and I'm thankful for this resource we have thanks to he and his family.
@rll19543 жыл бұрын
Other preachers and Bible teachers could learn much from reading and listening to Wayne Jackson.
@WornoutRNPARAMEDIC3 жыл бұрын
Such a wonderful Christian faithful Gospel Preacher. I was so blessed to have the opportunity to meet and get to know him a bit before his recent passing from life here to eternal life with God.
@jasonroberts7881 Жыл бұрын
Without question, one of the finest scholars in our brotherhood. Great man. Missed for sure. His sermon on "My My God My God, Why Have You Forsaken Me?" needs to be viewed by all. Breathtaking! KZbin and Search "Greatest Thoughts That Have Challenged My Mind" - Lesson #3. Whole series is fantastic.
@larrymorris45582 жыл бұрын
I really do appreciate the teaching and preaching of Brother Jackson, during his long and fruitful sojourn here on earth, and I thank him so very much for making such an important topic understandable to so many. But let me advise you that he (being human) made one statement that was in error. He said that all the sufferings in hell will be mental and not physical because those there won't have physical bodies. With this statement I disagree. These lost ones will also have been resurrected with eternal bodies as will all the saved. That's what the resurrection is, the recombining of spirits with bodies. I do not know what these bodies will be like, but, according to the apostle Paul, they will be like the body of Jesus after His resurrection. So the sufferings in hell will be both physical and mental (And I do believe that all the joys in heaven will be both physical and mental also.)
@cherihausmann2 жыл бұрын
Birth, marriage and death - rites of the church. But the death aspect is largely overlook in the modern Era.
@marcusbrooks6927 Жыл бұрын
Did he ever finish part two of this?
@Love6653 Жыл бұрын
Acts 2-Revelation 22 is the COMPLETE NEW TESTAMENT of YESHUA. Mathew-John BEFORE YESHUAS DEATH is all OLD TESTAMENT DOCTRINE. Mathew 5:17-18 Mathew 7:12 Romans 15:8 King James version John 6:38 John 7:16 verses 2 John 9-11
@bellcoolmountain66508 ай бұрын
I'm curious to what point you're making?
@Love66538 ай бұрын
@@bellcoolmountain6650 Any one who Follows Yeshua in those old testament Books of Mathew-John before Yeshuas death will be lost Period. Galatians 4:4-5 Romans 15:8 King James version. 2 John 9-11 verses John 7:16 Acts 2:42 Acts 2-Revelation 22 is the Complete new testament of Yeshua Period. This Non sense of teaching Yeshua taught new testament doctrine back under the Law of Moses is a Damnable Heresy and MUST BE STOPPED PERIOD.
@bellcoolmountain66508 ай бұрын
@@Love6653 but Jesus is ressurected in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John. How can these books be old testament when Jesus teaches in these books post ressurection? Matthew 28:19 is post ressurection gospel, *go therefore and make disciples of all the nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit* Jesus is teaching new testament gospel not Mosaical law in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John. Therefore these books cannot be old testament.
@Love66538 ай бұрын
@@bellcoolmountain6650 this is where You die hard traditionalist blow it big time You fail miserably on rightly dividing Gods word by the covenants 2 Timothy 2:15 . The time period after Yeshuas resurrection is the 50 day time period without any covenant in force period. The Law ended at John 19:30 it is FINISHED, the new testament begins in Acts 2 Yeshua spent 50 days teaching all not some of His new testament doctrine after His Resurrection Acts 1:3 John 16:12-15 Yeshua before His death was only a Minister of the Circumcision Romans 15:8 King James version Why do You think He told only the Apostles in Mathew Mark 16:15-16 to go into all the new testament World, but He sure did not do that in His Earthly Ministry now did He. Mathew 10:5-6 Mathew 15:24 You fail miserably to understand before Yeshua death there was salvation under the Law of Moses Luke 19:9 Galatians 4:4-5 Yeshua blood went back to cleanse all former old testament covenant People Romans 3:25 You folks have a serious problem of going back instead of going forward .Using common sense we can clearly read the new testament began in Acts 2 Period .Paul told the Jews when they were still called Jews not to Acknowledge Yeshua back under the Law of Moses in the Flesh 2 Corinthians 5:16 Read Romans 3:19-21 can't be any plainer than that. We were never under the Law of Moses. There is no Law of Moses today. There is No going back in a Different covenant age today we all must stay in the LIVING New Testament word of Christ Period Acts 2:42 2 John 9-11 verses John 7:16 please wake up out there folks. This Non sense of Mathew-John before Yeshuas death as new testament Doctrine is a DAMNABLE HERESY. You better not preach any other Gospel than the Apostles Galatians 1:6-9 and to ovoid that Yiu MUST STAY ONLY in the APOSTLES DOCTRINE PERIOD.
@colepriceguitar11532 жыл бұрын
He was a good man though he pushed for more division than he did unity.
@Kurt22222 жыл бұрын
What exactly was the division matters?
@colepriceguitar11532 жыл бұрын
@@Kurt2222 instrumental music is the main thing he encouraged division over.
@Kurt22222 жыл бұрын
@@colepriceguitar1153 I suppose he was against it in worship? If so, he would say there is no authority for it under the new testament pattern for worship." Will" worship is a real thing, worship how man wants to instead of accepting the only written authority we are all bound by. It's a huge gamble to wait until death or the return to find out if it's acceptable to God. Play it safe and don't fall for it is ALWAYS the rational choice.
@colepriceguitar11532 жыл бұрын
@@Kurt2222 It is 100x more dangerous to create division based on what the Bible doesn’t say then to do something that the Bible doesn’t explicitly permit. After all, there is no end to what the Bible doesn’t permit.
@Kurt22222 жыл бұрын
@@colepriceguitar1153 Bible never says not to smoke crack, don't you agree? So would that be allowed then? Bible also never says not to snort cocaine during worship, so you must agree it is permissible, right? You can't say no..... What if you pull up to the drive through window to order fries and milkshake, and when you get your stuff they hand you the fries with a milkshake you ordered plus 17 hotdogs with chili cheese fries and 10 Dr. Peppers. What would you say?......hey, I didn't order all this other stuff......then you hear, well, you didn't say NOT TO! Exact same concept, but you don't like it, neither would I. You authorize by what you SAY. Not by what you DONT say. You would have to go down the list and say.....don't give me hotdogs, don't give me chili cheese fries, don't give me dr peppers, don't give me....etc.....on and on we go. Our God deserves better than that also. Concept from lev chapter 10 is that Nadab and Abihu didn't take fire from where God specifically said NOT to, but it was simply from the source that WAS NOT authorized. So they died on the spot because they did not sanctify God by following only what He said