Wanted to remake this for a long time. The Reconquista fundamentally shifted the world, and I wanted to explore in detail a full alternate world where it never happens. Apologies on taking so long, this script took a while. I also have a second channel now. I talk about pointless stuff, like Battle LA, if you remember that. If you just like hearing me talk about stuff then check it out. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXnOlpekepyHhs0
@Sammyfarel3 жыл бұрын
Good job brother love from Pakistan ❤️🇵🇰
@ikira24643 жыл бұрын
Man this channel is ravaged with bots
@Jay26463 жыл бұрын
I just watched the original the other day! A lot of your older stuff is super-duper interesting, and I'd love to see a good chunk of it be remade with higher production quality!
@ommsterlitz18053 жыл бұрын
Please do the same for Coptic Egypt if it stayed Christian
@remenir973 жыл бұрын
@@ikira2464 you’re telling me, minute after I commented, I got a stupid bot.
@Butter_Warrior993 жыл бұрын
Oh goodness, this would definitely make a different America.
@alexjv13703 жыл бұрын
How so?
@jeffreyli74213 жыл бұрын
@@alexjv1370 most of the Americas speak Spanish
@ommsterlitz18053 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyli7421 You mean French in the video he say that France and Uk speaks French and are the same country so obviously the combined countries could spread much further in americas
@zakback99373 жыл бұрын
@@alexjv1370 Ideologies, values, religions etc. Instead of Liberalism and Secularism. It'd be Sharia Law possibly.
@seandawson58993 жыл бұрын
@@zakback9937 I don't think because modern Moraco followed sharia law that means that it's necessarily what would happen in the America's. The Moroccan empire was reasonably tolerant.
@SpaceMonkeyBoi3 жыл бұрын
The British: **land in America** The natives: "Salam, habibi" The British: "wtf"
@Avicerox3 жыл бұрын
This would be cursed yet very interesting.
@Bolter0243 жыл бұрын
The natives: "Wallah walllah, mashallah" 😂
@tekmilletbirummet48083 жыл бұрын
@@Avicerox Habibi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Avicerox3 жыл бұрын
@@tekmilletbirummet4808 Akhi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its nice to see you!!!!!!!!!!!!
@takumifujiwara29513 жыл бұрын
The British: go back we got to go back!!!
@jamesjung6215 Жыл бұрын
This scenario has been recreated in 2022 in the form of Morocco beating Spain and Portugal in the World Cup
@shine0018 Жыл бұрын
Wtf👵🏿
@Zycore1 Жыл бұрын
And then losing to France
@GermanicWorldOrder Жыл бұрын
And then Battle of Tours 2-0💀🇫🇷
@NA-AN Жыл бұрын
@@GermanicWorldOrder Your pfp makes little sense to me.
@GermanicWorldOrder Жыл бұрын
@@NA-AN And I don't need your approval for whatever I put as my pfp
@Leivve3 жыл бұрын
So the thing about Asturias is "go around the mountains" wasn't a thing. The reason Asturias survived is cause there were no roads into it, and there were no roads because it was such a hard to get to back water that even the romans couldn't be bothered to build them. Though in hindsight it was the correct move, were you in the sultan's court and were urging him to cross over, you would have been dismissed from the court for incompetence, and expedition like that would have easily gone badly, and if it did that would have caused the entire kingdom to fall apart.
@AlternateHistoryHub3 жыл бұрын
Quite true. My original point was more to just remove Asturias from the question. Mountains/roads were the main factor as to why the Muslims couldn't take it, and I probably should have worded that better. This is already a tentative scenario as it is, considering how unlikely it'd be the Muslims could have kept Spain. Appreciate the insight.
@ahmadsultan46433 жыл бұрын
Could Naval invasion work
@stevenfasano66733 жыл бұрын
@@ahmadsultan4643 i would think a medival beach landing would have worked as long as the muslims had enough troops to make an actual beach head
@Ali-bu6lo3 жыл бұрын
Maybe if Muslims win Battle of Covadonga, the death all remaining Visigoth nobility will be enough of a blow to cause Asturias to fall apart and be gradually taken over?
@dragon_ninja_21863 жыл бұрын
Well Cody did say it was unrealistic but Asturias needs to be removed/weakened somehow. So I guess alien space bats.
@ZendikarMage427503 жыл бұрын
This feels a lot like trying to predict the entire course of the rest of a Crusader Kings game after playing for 50 years, heh heh
@thebutzel97523 жыл бұрын
I would say it’s exactly like trying to predict a CK game’s end result
@thelordofcringe3 жыл бұрын
I can't predict the next ten years of a Crusader Kings game at this point. One moment byzantium will conquer everything up to the Chinese border, the next minute they're in a civil war against jews, the next minute the whole of Northern Europe belongs to Croatia.
@TheUrobolos3 жыл бұрын
Most CK2 games usually ends up with either Sunnis or Catholics devouring the entire map tho, so there is a form of predictabily. Which one usually depends on the start dare. The earlier the date, the most likely Sunnis will snowball (especially after decadence was made a non-factor patch after patch). The more you start forward, closer to the Crusades unlock, the more likely Catholics will snowball instead
@arya.n.82523 жыл бұрын
I don't think this is a prediction rather he just recite what happened during his play session
@wizdabaws27933 жыл бұрын
Literally playing a mega-campaign from CK2 Halfdan White Shirt start right now. One thing led to another and now the British Empire is more of a European Empire.
@Joseph-xg8vi Жыл бұрын
I spent several months living in Granada. It's a truly amazing city with rich history and beautiful architecture, yet somehow most people have never even heard of it. It's a must for Spain IMO.
@muhammadabyzard7970 Жыл бұрын
Tell em about Ford Granada, then. 😂😂
@Husro_History_96210 ай бұрын
Yep Ive also been there
@tverdislavrolensky35976 ай бұрын
I lived in a Granada for a while. Wasn't bad until the floors rusted out
@AlMuqaddimahYT3 жыл бұрын
3:13 Hey! I'm on TV!
@Ali-sj7kx3 жыл бұрын
I really like ur videos, keep it up
@TimouOfConstantine3 жыл бұрын
Say hello to the camera
@Raf151517 ай бұрын
I love your profile picture
@thismuricanboi78693 жыл бұрын
This would be a tragedy for Spanish Inquisition memes.
@hellothere94073 жыл бұрын
I did not expect this outcome
@goroakechi61263 жыл бұрын
@@hellothere9407 No one ever does!
@seandawson58993 жыл бұрын
A big win for the thousands that died tho
@releca37353 жыл бұрын
No one except the Sharia police !
@rc591913 жыл бұрын
It would just be changed to those sharia patrols and secret police checking to make sure men's downstairs hair were cut to the appropriate measurements.
@thebakerofbananabread32373 жыл бұрын
"Hey Cody, what if Moors held Spain?" "French Dialects" "Wow, what else?" "The Dutch are deleted" "What about things in Al Andalus, could they get to the new world?" "There can be only one Caliphate... Also yes but I'll discuss that later." "Yes!"
@jihadi-against-oppression2 жыл бұрын
islam is the only true religion ☪️😍
@Sub-om7hq2 жыл бұрын
@@jihadi-against-oppression not really
@sebastianbarros89162 жыл бұрын
no
@Muhammad-ben-wael Жыл бұрын
Duh it is, whether you like it or not
@Omar-Coronel Жыл бұрын
@@jihadi-against-oppression meh
@spencerjacobsen3293 жыл бұрын
“This all just seems like an elaborate way to make sure the Dutch don’t exist.” Lmao
@laynaTheLobster3 жыл бұрын
An admirable and noble objective
@elemperadordemexico3 жыл бұрын
History with Hilbert wants to know your location
@isyraf99893 жыл бұрын
Probably Dutch become part of Germany
@hendrikdependrik18913 жыл бұрын
A successful Al-Andalus is just a way for Moroccans to troll Wilders supporters.
Damn, when you really think about it, this really is one of the most consequential PODs in history, as Cody mentions. So much of the modern world in this timeline would be unrecognizable without the Catholic Iberian monarchies, the protestant reformation, and the European colonization of the Americas. Mind-blowing.
@Zenmasterslim3 жыл бұрын
Cody: "In this alternate timeline, even without the Portuguese, somebody eventually would find the America's, but that is for another time." Me: "Sequel?" Cody: "And yes this is a two part-er." STOP READING MY MIND CODY.
@Jordaniantrex3 жыл бұрын
Nein
@meneither38343 жыл бұрын
Western Europe was bound to find America (Newfoundland) by following the Cod fishing spots.
@GmodPlusWoW3 жыл бұрын
I'm certainly eager to hear what this alternate Age of Discovery would yield. Presumably "Latin America" as we know it would instead be more of an "Islamic America", which would certainly have strong ideological ramifications in the long run.
@mattpienk63003 жыл бұрын
@@GmodPlusWoW imagine taking Arabic in school instead of Spanish
@jonnunn41963 жыл бұрын
In fact, the Vikings beat out Columbus by centuries.
@valritz14893 жыл бұрын
Another possible historical tangent: With a strong al-Andalus providing a counterweight to Ottoman Turkish rule of the Islamic world, it might be that the fight over the spice trade becomes more about a fight over Egypt than a search for a route to India around back of the world. al-Andalus tries to secure Egypt as an alternate route for the Silk Road, the Ottomans try to stymie them, and it turns into a political clusterfuck. Moreover, canal projects to connect the Mediterranean and Red Sea were floated a couple times in history, but maybe it's this fight between the Western and Eastern Caliphates that provides the necessary motivation. If the focus stays on the canal and it gets built, suddenly that's the new fulcrum of the world's trade... Which allows me to play my true endgame card, NEVERENDING GOLDEN AGE OF PIRACY BABY. Pirates of the Aegean! Mediterranean island-hopping, hidden ports of call all through Malaysia, Blackbeard with a turban! It's all coming up pirates!
@dinomar78183 жыл бұрын
It will definitely be easier for the ottomans to take egypt
@mxyellowo3 жыл бұрын
Also we should include that Al Andalus and Abbasids had rivalry against each other so Abbasids allied with Franks while Al Andalus allied with Byzantines. And we already know Ottomans were allied with France. So this would've mean that Al Andalus would either ally with Austria or Commonwealth.
@aphato27703 жыл бұрын
Blackbeard with a turban. I mean there is already Redbeard with a Turban
@rocket_sensha43373 жыл бұрын
Plotwist?!
@adityapf97533 жыл бұрын
H-How about the Venezia then? Anyway, this scenario (Golden Age of Mediterranean Pirate) would be a cool concept for novel or game
@shelbyandrews97493 жыл бұрын
I think it's awesome you remade this. I hope your other videos get the same treatment. Not saying they are terrible or anything, but there is nothing wrong for with going over something when you're skills improve
@HappyHog113 жыл бұрын
Two empires, both claiming to be the true Empire, positioned on opposite ends of the Mediterranean with growing reasons to dislike each other? It’s Rome all over again, just Islamic this time.
@ahmadsultan46433 жыл бұрын
The Abbasid and the Ummayed had stronger version of this rivalry
@levitschetter52883 жыл бұрын
I've seen this one before it's a classic
@igorokinamujika20733 жыл бұрын
@@ahmadsultan4643 The caliphate of Cordoba was ruled by Ummayads. When the Abbasids took power, the last Ummayad fled to the Iberian Peninsula.
@josesandoval14403 жыл бұрын
Just like how the even though the Muslims ottomans conquered eastern rome the eastern Mediterranean vs Persia/Iran continued
@yoghurtmaster16883 жыл бұрын
Caliphate is not exaclty an empire they simply both claim to be holy leaders of all islam Just imagine 2 popes figthing eachother
@Pendraig14003 жыл бұрын
England when they win against France but become french in the process: *I’ve won but at what cost*
@Edax_Royeaux3 жыл бұрын
They are forced to eat fine cuisine?
@jaredbullock53663 жыл бұрын
@@Edax_Royeaux I do like cuisses de grenouille but I’ve never had Escargot
@jakeaurod3 жыл бұрын
Do the vikings still go a-viking?
@sergiowinter53833 жыл бұрын
@@Edax_Royeaux Italian food is superior, can't beat pasta, pizza and lasagna. But the french know desserts and wine for sure
@mikealexandre34643 жыл бұрын
You forgot the most important fact. Without Portugal, there is no Catherine of Bragança, No Catherine of Bragança, there is no introduction of Tea to England. Without Tea in England, there is no civilized western world.
@frankdecron13063 жыл бұрын
I miss your old white back ground. Nostalgic for me man. Sorta like my childhood. I remember when you posted videos and you didn’t speak and it was like a slide show. I think it was like what if Germany won WW2 or won the Battle of Britain. A looooong time ago. But you should redo the rome series if you are redoing videos.
@biharek75953 жыл бұрын
Ha has already redone the Rome series actually. And I recommend you watching it, it's really great. Btw great profile picture 🇦🇹👑🇭🇺
@marvelfannumber13 жыл бұрын
@@biharek7595 No he did't. He did "What if Rome never existed", which is very different from "what if Rome never fell"
@biharek75953 жыл бұрын
@@marvelfannumber1 oh... sorry, my bad
@frankdecron13063 жыл бұрын
@@biharek7595 thanks lol
@Arkantos19003 жыл бұрын
I think Andalusia would heavily antagonize the Ottomans: they would threaten their title of Caliph, and also advance into the Mediterranean Isles for control. Probably the Mamluks would ask for andalusian help to remain independent, or Andalusia would ally with European states to combat the Ottomans, like the Battle of Lepanto.
@johnmaulana70273 жыл бұрын
What I see will be almost the same thing happened between Safavid Persia and Ottoman. This scenario will have both Ottoman Empire and Al Andalus will always have constant Battle for North Africa especially area around Algeria today. Just like Ottoman-Safavid War that always fought around their border and modern day Iraq And if there will be Alliance it will also like this Ottoman ally with France and Al Andalus Ally with Austria or Hungry (well depend who the great power in this scenario.)
@Thanatar133 жыл бұрын
Probably just like OTL, we'd also see a incredibly strong French-Ottoman relationship, but this time with a competing Hapsburg-Andalusian counterpart.
@johnmaulana70273 жыл бұрын
@@Whatareyoudoinnhere Its depends tho who controls Algeria if Andalus can somehow defeat Ottoman and defend Algeria. But what certain tho I can see Al Andalus rule Morocco even tho I would 100% sure they have full control of the north of Morocco instead and have less control or not even under their rule south of Morocco. based on their OTL history that they once only rule the north to stop Fatimid Caliphate expansion
@Arkantos19003 жыл бұрын
Also another important thing happening is that the influx of jews and moriscos that were scholars, doctors and more academics the Ottomans received wouldn't happen... since you know, no Spanish Inquisition
@othmanbettach26653 жыл бұрын
@@johnmaulana7027 it's the other way around, morocco controled al andalus for so long and they'd do the same in that different timming
@gretarreynisson32803 жыл бұрын
18:56 Sailors: Ocean: *You’re going to Brazil*
@avantelvsitania33593 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video, although as a Portuguese it’s always when someone uses “Spain” when in reference for the whole Peninsula. Iberia, or even Hispania would be better. One interesting aspect is that the Christian “states” that emerge in the Reconquest, are based on the heterogeneous cultural substratum of the Peninsula, meaning that they are political reflections of local identities. It’s well likely that even if Muslim rule was maintained, distinct cultures would emerge in the Northeast and Northwest, analogous to Galicia-Portugal and Aragon-Catalonia. It’s very probable that political autonomies would emerge here as well, even becoming independent like in our timeline, just in a Muslim version like “Ghalisyya” and ‘“Arajun”. About the fact that this timeline denies the existence of the Netherlands as we know it. Well, there is another factor. Muslim Iberia was more tolerant to other religions. In our timeline, the Jews were expelled in the XVI century, many migrating precisely to the Netherlands, were they helped finance the emerging Dutch colonial empire. If Iberia had remained Muslim, the Netherlands would probably never become the financial powerhouse they were in our timeline. Finally I would just despite the claim the 80% of Al-Andalus was Muslim. The elites were, but the population remained largely Christian, although they followed their own rites. They were called the Mozarabs.
@thedragon54133 жыл бұрын
Nah bro most were Muslim and yes they did use mozoarabic but the majority were untill like 1100
@shinsenshogun9003 жыл бұрын
The Netherlands of that timeline would just be a disunited provinces of German, French, Flemish, Walloon, Frisian, and Burgundian fiefdoms
@TOBAPNW_3 жыл бұрын
@@shinsenshogun900 yeah but what would the Netherlands of that timeline be? 😂
@Charlietolemy3 жыл бұрын
@@shinsenshogun900 german*. Both belgium and Netherlands remain part of the holy Roman empire, and will continue speaking dialects of german until germany eventually unifies. The spanish empire habsbrug split will ot happen.
@Charlietolemy3 жыл бұрын
Your right, there will be some autonomous provinces and the population would follow a very mixed faith, with majority being Muslim folowed by Christian and Judaism. The Netherlands would most likely never become the powerhouse of became in our timeline, instead this will further help cordóba.
@enternamehere41243 жыл бұрын
I always love when people Talk about the iberian peninsula
@matthewlong75473 жыл бұрын
The most least most important part of Europe
@jjgf84123 жыл бұрын
@@matthewlong7547... Thanks?
@jihadi-against-oppression2 жыл бұрын
We moors will come back again
@Spoopy_man2 жыл бұрын
@@jihadi-against-oppression only by immigration.
@Connor-o9q9 ай бұрын
@@jihadi-against-oppression that history is long gone!! Muslims were never true Spainards in the first place
@ianmessiter55643 жыл бұрын
I'm hyped for part two! Bgreat video!
@GroundBack3 жыл бұрын
I'm normally not here this fast. But considering the algorithm messed you up last time, you better believe I'm gonna try my best to support you this time!
@byzantium00863 жыл бұрын
If the Muslims kept Spain surely their would be no nude beaches out their!
@NihlusKryik3 жыл бұрын
Brave to assume Henry VIII wouldn’t just have a different wife he’d want to divorce
@prcervi3 жыл бұрын
with how much random chance was left up to that point, even odds that he even gets the throne in the first place(and all that snowballs from that point onward)
@savioblanc3 жыл бұрын
Annulments happened all the time. No doubt Henry VIII would have likely had one But the Pope would likely have accepted it It's just that in our timeline, Catherine of Aragon happened to be the aunt of the most powerful European king at the time, who just happened to be occupying Rome and keeping the Pope hostage
@aaronmarks93663 жыл бұрын
If so much had happened from the 8th century onwards to the point that the Hundred Year's War of the 14th-15th century never happens, then you can bet there's no Wars of the Roses, no Tudor takeover, and no Henry VIII.
@beeaggro25933 жыл бұрын
There likely wouldn't be a Henry VIII at all since there wouldn't be a Tudor takeovers as the Tudors wouldn't even exist
@masonivanov3 жыл бұрын
Video idea: During the movie "The Final Countdown (1980)" an aircraft carrier travels back in time to the day of the attack on pearl harbor. At the end of the movie, the carrier returnes to its own time. What if, instead, the carrier stayed back in 1941? How would this have affected the war?
@joaobaptista3203 жыл бұрын
About how french would become the 'Upper Class Launguage' - It already was. Monarchs from all Western and central europe spoke French. Just like non English people naturally say "OK", Royals and nobility would speak french has the "fancy launguage". It was only in a post-Congress of Vienna(Or dare I Say late 1800s) that English become more widely spoken, mostly due to the Industrial Revolution. We still use some french, like "Coup d'ètat". Why? Because it's damn fancy and makes us seem smart. And that was exactly why the nobility spoke french: To draw a line, clearly marking themselves as superiors.
@RabbitShirak3 жыл бұрын
Lingua franca anyone?
@straydogswagger42803 жыл бұрын
You're absolutely correct. In fact, during a large stretch of Russian history, the Russian aristocracy spoke French instead of Russian. They literally needed translators to speak with their own peasants
@sergiowinter53833 жыл бұрын
French sounds gay, I'm happy English is the language of the world. I prefer Latin and Greek of course but English is a solid choice
@RabbitShirak3 жыл бұрын
@@sergiowinter5383 Eh, english grammar rules are messed up. Then again, numbers in french are just bizarre.
@GATE123 жыл бұрын
Check my channel for a reply to this video.
@angusyang59173 жыл бұрын
Cody actually brought up a pretty important here: dynastic linages. Europe's royal families since the time of Charlemagne are heavily intertwined in that all of the royal families are related through generations of intermarriage. In modern-day Europe, the last common ancestor of all current monarchs is Johan Willem Friso, Prince of Orange, and his wife, Marie Louise of Hesse-Kassel, who only lived ~300 years ago. If any of Europe's kingdoms and dynasties were to somehow disappear off the map, then entire successions and lineages would be shifted and changed, and countless marriages and descendants would not exist.
@angusyang59173 жыл бұрын
@@anomonyous Yeah, after a couple hundred years, all of Europe's families became related. By the time of the 17th and 18th centuries, it was either marry a cousin, or enter a morganatic marriage and risk losing your titles and lands for your descendants.
@uveantonio40943 жыл бұрын
good date
@ne0tic3 жыл бұрын
How about an ''What if the Swedish Empire didn't go to Moscow and instead looked south'' video? Would be interesting I think and you could look at the ''Pax Swedeanica'' alternate timeline for some inspiration :)
@jakespacepiratee37403 жыл бұрын
Here is an interesting idea: What if the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom had survived long-term?
@angusyang59173 жыл бұрын
The Century of Humiliation would have still marched on regardless.
@mshaqed25383 жыл бұрын
Probably a swift collapse after the founder died, meaning an earlier warlord era. Also, the Taiping would attempt to modernize China, and while they will fail, it would still allow it to develop early, meaning that it might just have a shorter century of humiliation. Oh, and the warlord era would cause a scramble for China by the Europeans, with all the major power backing a few contestants in an attempt to outmaneuver their rivals. This would probably cause an early world war since Russia would annex or vassalize all of the north, causing Britain and Japan to panic, while the heated competition would give the Europeans a lot of opportunities to fight against each other. Oh, and the Taiping might just create a massive "Christian" minority in China, which would alter the whole nation in various different ways.
@descalzitao67793 жыл бұрын
The Taiping (like most Chinese millenarist insurrections) were insanely unstable, having no real societal organisation besides warfare and relying solely on the charisma of Hong Xiuquan. If they eventually did managed to overthrow the Qing (which they could never unless they have either outside support or other rebellions happening at the same time and joining them), the only two logical outcomes would either be : 1. China fell into chaos as absolutely no one would recognize the weak Taiping state as legitimate, plunging the country in an early warlord era. 2. Someone at the Taiping court that wasn't absolutely crazy manages to take power and consolidate the country, removing all crazy elements from society (first and foremost getting rid of Christianity) and establishing a "regular" Chinese dynasty that could actually have some chance of surviving. However, China is only weakened by this so the century of humiliation carries on and probably intensifies. I could see for example the Japanese managing to push their "twenty-one demands" on China in this timeline. Finally I don't think the Taiping would actually help China to modernize, on the contrary while they were "Christian", they also were incredibly xenophobic and traditionalistic, rejecting foreign influences on China. If anything, they would have pushed Chinese isolationism even further.
@guillermoelnino3 жыл бұрын
what about if taiwan retook west taiwan with us help?
@raptorfromthe6ix8333 жыл бұрын
jesus would be proud obviously
@GeneralLuigiTBC3 жыл бұрын
8:21 Cody: The English language as we know it fundamentally changes in such an important period of development. Book in the background animation: Я--русская книга.
@acro68413 жыл бұрын
YESSS I LITERALLY HAD THIS ON MY WISH LIST THANK YOU SO MUCH CODY
@deron22033 жыл бұрын
Granada one of my favorite eu4 playthroughs. I would recommend people to try out ante bellum if you'd like to have this somewhat similar experience of Iberia being Muslim at the start date.
@AdamNoizer3 жыл бұрын
I love Ante Bellum.
@jaroslawkaras73473 жыл бұрын
@Klunteng Full,,,, 👇😍 yeah your definatly some random bot yeah nice try how about you go to Phub to do that
@m.thorton93053 жыл бұрын
and change the andalusian tech into western of course
@AdamNoizer3 жыл бұрын
@@m.thorton9305 Or just get Quality ideas 😎
@m.thorton93053 жыл бұрын
@@AdamNoizer hey i want muslim cavalry in the style of european knight, not some curved sword from turkified east
@TheDanEdwards3 жыл бұрын
"Somebody would eventually find the Americas" - the Polynesians. If Andalus was even a century later than our own timeline in sailing to the New World, chances are the Polynesians may have set up establishments on the west coast of South America.
@LautaroArgentino3 жыл бұрын
Polynesians did reach America before Europeans did. There's evidence of trade, particularly with Andean cultures.
@gabbo71013 жыл бұрын
there is already evidence that the polynesians had already touched into the americas. The thing is, either way, their presence wouldnt be nearly as impactful as eventual european colonization. Though, spain's original intention with the native americans was to set up trade routes, so there is a possibility that if cortez doesnt do a cortez, the central american kingdoms and the like would have been around for a bit longer, and their cultural presence would be more considerable.
@Lustratic853 жыл бұрын
You cant find something thats been already found, that be like me going to japan and say i found this place because the inhabitants of this place dont look like me.
@LautaroArgentino3 жыл бұрын
@@gabbo7101 this is something people often ignore. Cortes left Cuba as a traitor, and would most certainly had been executed on any other circumstance. They had been given clear orders of establishing trade with the Americans. Then Cortes lied his way through Mesoamerica claiming to be a representative of the Castilian crown, which he was not. If it wasn't for the Tlaxcalans he would have failed. And with that the fate of the indigenous peoples western hemisphere would've been changed forever.
@darken24173 жыл бұрын
@@Lustratic85 NO you CAN discover a place that other people already know about. You are discovering something that you or your group don't know about, it doesn't matter who knows about it or if there are people living there. Hell you are also discovering that those people exist. Discovery isn't some sort of shared accomplishment for all of humanity nor is it the first comment on the comment section.
@xplinux222 жыл бұрын
As a Sephardic Jew with some Iraqi heritage, I wouldn't have been born at all. My ancestry would be split between Al Andalus and/or Morocco together with Iraq. The mass expulsion of Sepharadim from Iberia wouldn't have occurred as part of the Reconquista, and I suspect Sephardic Judaism would be largely isolated to Spain, Portugal, and possibly Morocco and not as prevalent globally as it is today.
@oblivionrapture14693 жыл бұрын
I literally looked this topic up like an hour before you posted this, it’s glorious
@Charles-In-Charge3 жыл бұрын
¡Olé! I'm so hyped for part two, so happy you remade this.
@ankledrew81503 жыл бұрын
I'm still theorizing on you europe wiped out video, thank you for releasing this. Big help.
@alexfarrow27403 жыл бұрын
funny thing mentioning "island French" it actually already exists, its jerriaise a hybrid of the two languages already in use.
@zillionrainbow72723 жыл бұрын
You should do "What if Bismarck never left power and stayed chancellor?" What would European politics be like if the iron chancellor was in charge of Germany instead of Wilhelm II
@christophmaier43973 жыл бұрын
Ok larper
@ThisCharmlessMan3 жыл бұрын
By the time he was dismissed he was becoming too old to rule, and Bismarck, the ultimate conservative, wouldn't have ever let Germany not have an emperor with a large amount of executive power.
@KitchenSinkSoup3 жыл бұрын
I think a more interesting one would be what if Kaiser Frederick III ruled for longer.
@CountScarlioni3 жыл бұрын
I don't think the path Germany was on (eg. the runaway train of Prussian militarism) could have been avoided. Bismarck was unparalleled in geopolitical skill, and knew when to trust his pragmatism over his nationalism - keeping the balance of power in Europe whilst growing German influence. There simply wasn't anyone suitable to replace him, even if he had hung around into his wheelchair bound years. Weak reformers like Caprivi and blustering jingoists like von Bülow just weren't in the same league. Wilhelm II was always going to get his way.
@KitchenSinkSoup3 жыл бұрын
@@CountScarlioni But what if Frederick III somehow survives throat cancer?
@fractur3d4422 жыл бұрын
I noticed that the chapters have is a little bit wrong, its called al Andalus but overall the video was great!
@valdamirlebanon45083 жыл бұрын
While I'm a big fan of Cody's work, I have to say that I disagree with one of the underlying assumptions of this video. The northern Christian kingdoms of Iberia we're not constantly and consistently pushing Southward throughout the entirety of Andalusian history, in fact throughout most of their history Andalusia had fairly strong Geographic protection from the north in the form of the Central and Iberian Mountain chains of Spain (yes that's what they're called). I bring this up because there was actually a much more natural point of Divergence much later in Andalusian history involving a war over the succession of Muslim Toledo between Leon and Seville. Leon ended up winning this war and it was because of that they were able to unite the rest of the peninsula, so it stands to reason that if Seville had won the war they would at least be able to unite the southern half over the peninsula under new Muslim rulership.
@sb-lm1yu3 жыл бұрын
Interesting point and perspective!
@Dustz923 жыл бұрын
Or just the caliphate not imploding after the death of Almazor. Prior to that point Christians had barely advanced.
@blecao3 жыл бұрын
i would put the divergence on the fall of the caliphate into Taifas more than in the conquest of Toledo
@AdamNoizer3 жыл бұрын
Another more natural point of divergence could also have been the reign of Hisham II through Hajib Almanzor. If I remember correctly, even though the Caliph was basically a figurehead during his reign, it still represented the peak of power for Cordoba, and Almanzor essentially reduced the northern Christian kingdoms to a state of indefinite vassalage, sacking their capitals multiple times and pushing the borders slightly further north. He didn't conquer the cities because garrisoning them would have been more expensive than just plundering and returning home. However a more conquest bent rather than raid focused foreign policy could have changed that.
@blecao3 жыл бұрын
@Fajr Core That is also common on the western (for example in spain it was called pena ha galeras)but your dont talk about other of the main sources of slaves that where the batles and the raids across the mediterranean coast
@TheAwesomeAlan3 жыл бұрын
My favorite way to see how this plays out is in Europa Universalis, playing as the Ottomans and assisting Granada in reclaiming Spain. This prevents any Spanish or Portuguese colonization in the New World.
@redwolf9153 жыл бұрын
So English and French domination
@muhammadomar94873 жыл бұрын
@@redwolf915 atleast French mexico or English brazil is better
@takumifujiwara29513 жыл бұрын
@@muhammadomar9487 French mexico is just a sin goo thing it didn't happen
@stricktpine90672 жыл бұрын
I for one fully support the remaking of old videos.
@Divenity3 жыл бұрын
"You know now that I think about it, this whole alternate timeline really just seems like an elaborate way to make sure the Dutch never exist" *Nigel Powers has entered the chat*
@fduranthesee3 жыл бұрын
Can’t touch the Dutch Clutch 🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🍦🍦🍦
@Deridus3 жыл бұрын
FINALLY! Now there is truly nothing wrong with Belgium!
@MrGilang1003 жыл бұрын
Foresight for the next topic ending in AltHis-Hub Alternate History Universe.
@Piratejoe443 жыл бұрын
@@Deridus Belgium are just traitorous catholic dutch who larp as french. Without the dutch you'd just stop larping and actually be as French as the Picards. Edit: If you don't know what I mean when I say Picards, there's a people and language in the one area of the lowlands that neither Belgium or the Neatherlands ever managed to get back with a people who have been ruled over by the french for quite some time.
@TOBAPNW_3 жыл бұрын
@@Piratejoe44 lmao as an Australian I had never conceived of Dutch-Belgian roasting but it makes perfect sense; any two groups who border and have so much in common (language, history, etc.) are going to hate the differences. Like England-Scotland, no? Except the Belgians actually managed to get free.
@VRBroadcasting3 жыл бұрын
This is already one of my top favorite videos(two-parter series) from Alt-Hist
@barnertalik18063 жыл бұрын
Very excited for part 2 :)
@aritzneo3 жыл бұрын
Great video and I can imagine why you have chosen not to elaborate on the Ottoman Empire and their further expansion into Europe after the fall of Constantinople, because it is a complicated calculation. Indeed, the lack of a Spanish armada puts the Ottomans at an advantage on the sea at least on paper, because removing the spaniards from Lepanto is basically giving the turks a free win (provided that Al-Andalus does not participate against them!). However, in land it is VERY difficult to hypothesize an outcome: you could assume Habsburgs would be weaker (no dynastic ties to Spain, reduced impact on the HRE) making things easier for the turks, but you have to consider as well that the lack of Reformation also implies a more stable central Europe and, more importantly, no wars of religion, particularly the desvastating Thirty Years War. In any case it is a fun scenario to hypothesize with and it was a good effort. I hope to see the second part soon!
@Charlietolemy3 жыл бұрын
That's the thing with alternate histories, it's nearly goddamn impossible to predict.
@GATE123 жыл бұрын
Check my channel for a reply to this video.
@SIGNOR-G2 жыл бұрын
Even wothout spaniards there wpuld still be the arch enemy of the ottomand. Venice!
@izebdeh3 жыл бұрын
"And yes this is a two parter" *Instant smile on my face*
@Connor-o9q9 ай бұрын
Spain will never be muslim again,this is history,islam doesn't belong in spain
@adamramadan86933 жыл бұрын
Great video as always. One of my favorites for sure. Would be cool if you could do a video on Africa-India relations ive been researching it recently super interesting
@akramgimmini81653 жыл бұрын
A Good Alternative History Video as Always Keep up the Good Work, Cody 👍
@xKatakiuchii3 жыл бұрын
haven't clicked this fast in a while, been waiting for this for a while and its worth it.
@RamRam-vn5kv3 жыл бұрын
i've been in ANDALUCIA this past week SEVILLA,GRANADA,MALAGA you can see all the traces of MOORS ARCHITECTURE and AL-HAMBRA is MAGNIFICENT
@m3rrys0ngstr3ss3 жыл бұрын
"And yes, there's a part 2" - HELL YES!
@gabrielzinho32303 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad this will have a second part
@xMetalhead20003 жыл бұрын
You should start remaking more of the older vids you had some amazing concepts that I’d love to see fleshed out more
@kuroazrem53763 жыл бұрын
As a historian on this period, I actually agree with your assesment on Al-Andalus, but I would add that they would also expand into Southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean as a result of competition with the Ottomans. They would also expand into Morocco, since keeping the Berber tribes (who migrated in large numbers into Al-Andalus) in check was vital to their survival. I would also add that this Islamic society would be very different from the Córdoba we imagine, since, in order to conquer the mountainous northern Iberia, one needs Berber troops, who converted in the 740's to another sect called Kharijism. The Kharijites would have then unified Iberia under their rule, and thus prevent an Arab caliphate from rising. In other words, Al-Andalus would be essentially a wierd mixture between Visigothic and Berber Muslim cultures. But I do still think they would continue their Golden Age of science down to today.
@mathiassunyenetto3818 Жыл бұрын
I would say no. The importation of Berbers was one of the factors that destabilized Andalus. With the Berbers not getting along with the local population whether muwallasa (Iberian Muslims) or Mozaradics (Christians of the Caliphate) they were to ortodox for nation. What Andalus needed was to start using muwallads in government and military positions. Not to mention that the tribes began their same shift to Iberia with Al-mansur to combat the influence of the saqaliba (Slavic slave soldiers) and loyalists of the Umayyads. Importing Berbers is probably one of the worst possible tactics.
@CharaDreemurr_Undertale Жыл бұрын
I don't think they would "compete" with the Ottomans at all. In our timeline, when Al-Andalus got completely wiped out by the Spanish, most of the Muslim (and even the Jews) requested help from the Ottomans; which accepted and sent their navy to escort the Muslim transport ships. This caused fightings between the Spanish and the Ottomans trying to get the Muslims out. This proves that Al-Andalus had a good relationship with the Turks, that they would risk sparking war with the Spanish to help the Al-Andalus if they would need.
@187mrsmith3 жыл бұрын
I learned more on the alternate history hub than I ever did in history class
@maciek_k.cichon3 жыл бұрын
Just don't cross the history streams on exams
@ireallycantthinkofaname4726Ай бұрын
Great video
@RayshiaRoman3 жыл бұрын
The interesting thing here is if Al-Andalus was extremely stable in Iberia since the arrival of Muslims, that means the ruling dynasty in all of this video would be Umayyads. This is important since the Umayyads was the Second Caliphate in Islamic history that took power after the Rashidun Caliphs. If Iberia was stable, the Umayyads would probably try to use it as a base to retake the territories that was lost after the Abbasid Revolution. The Maghrebs would probably either be conquered or become vassal state of the Iberian Caliphate. So they would also have more reasons to hate the Ottomans who in their opinion would be another upstart who usurped their rightful title as Caliph. If the Ottomans reached much of their historical extent, the Umayyad and Ottoman power struggle would most likely take place in Italy and Libya. Interesting stuff
@GrtSage3 жыл бұрын
I’m really looking forward to Cody redoing his older vids. I wanna see What if the Mongols never existed.
@angusyang59173 жыл бұрын
That would be a massive butterfly effect in itself, the Mongols basically wiped the slate clean for most dynasties, and allowed new ones to rise.
@cerridianempire16533 жыл бұрын
or what if they stayed in power for much longer than in our timeline
@tranquoccuong890-its-orge3 жыл бұрын
or just a short one about what if the golden horde branch of the mongols successfully conquered all of europe
@Thanatar133 жыл бұрын
It screws with Russian unification and the rise of Moscow over Novgorod for starters- and China and the Levant are going to be better off- Iran is going to be FAR better off. Most the the 'stans (minus eastern Pakistan) are going to remain firmly Iranian/Iranic (not as in Persian, but as in Aryan/Iranian), and Iranic nomadic peoples are going to remain a significant force in northern Eurasia up to and including the Ukraine. OTL Iranic peoples were both greatly reduced and assimilated by Slavic, Turkic, Mongolian, and Germanic peoples- much of that isn't going to happen here, at least not in the same sense. And then finally, no Mongols = no Pax Mongolica- the progression of trade and ideas is going to be considerably lessened. Western Europe is the loser in that case- by and large kind of a backwater then- alternate Russia, Italy if and when it unifies, and the Byzantines if they survive (they have a pretty good shot at it without the Mongols IMO, not due to Mongols having been disastrous for them but rather due to the Mongols having further empowered and spread Turkic peoples- the whole Turko-Mongol synthesis thing) will probably all be more significant- France, Spain (or Andalus, but more likely Spain), England and some power on the Great European Plain (German or Polish, probably) will all still be significant eventually, but not overwhelmingly so. The Mongols massively depopulated central Asia in particular (bad blood with the Iranic Khwarezmians). So my guesses would be- later and much different unification of Russia/the Eurasian steppe (a Eurasian power, likely centered around some former Kievan Rus state just like OTL); slightly more prosperous China and Arab states, and any ATL version of Iran is going to be massively buffed. Big winners- Iran, with some chance of the Polish-Lithuanians also capitalizing on later Russian unification enough to take a lead in the process at least in the west, of sorts. Considerably improved situation for China, the Arabs and their golden age, and probably to Italy and the Byzantines- weakening the Turks makes them likely to remain the economic and cultural hearts of Europe for longer and disincentivizes Christian powers from their whole "age of exploration" thing.
@christiandauz37423 жыл бұрын
Maybe China starts the Industrial Revolution in the 1200s It's like going from Crusader Kings to Victoria in fast-forward China, India and Turks become Imperial Powers like the Europeans WW1 in 1314!!!
@Canada19943 жыл бұрын
Cody: "What if the Muslims kept Spain?" Portugal: "Am I a joke to you?"
@ghrtfhfgdfnfg3 жыл бұрын
Yeah… “Iberia” is the proper term here
@Canada19943 жыл бұрын
@@ghrtfhfgdfnfg I know. In Europa Universalis IV I only play as Castile if I use a mod I have to create a nation called Iberia when I control all of it
@samuelturner16683 жыл бұрын
Great video Cody! I've been watching your videos since I was about 15. I'm 21 now. Please don't stop.
@gyver84483 жыл бұрын
"The English would speak French." Me, an Englishman: NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
@blecao3 жыл бұрын
Non you are meant to say non pesky anglo = )
@gyver84483 жыл бұрын
@@blecao ...Fuck. That would've been funnier to say instead of no, now that I think about it. Oh well.
@blecao3 жыл бұрын
@@gyver8448 jajaja you are welcome
@azzzanadra3 жыл бұрын
a lot of english words came from french, don't you see that? the frenchman was in you all along!
@browhat46973 жыл бұрын
@@gyver8448 I mean it would be better than speaking this "English"
@earltaylor18933 жыл бұрын
Yay! A 2 part series!
@Lawfair3 жыл бұрын
English and Irish fisherman were within two or three decades of discovering Newfoundland in our time, and this is a phenomenon that would likely be independent of great men history and politics, so I'd wager the Anglo-Irish still find the new world and get there before al Andalus. Also it occurs to me if the Muslims don't go for Tours, than Charles Martel never rises to prominence and Pepin the Short is much less likely to overthrow the Merovingian dynasty.
@TheArctofireHD3 жыл бұрын
I loved this video! Great job! Can't wait for part 2!
@DrSmoke21042 жыл бұрын
As a minor islamic history reader by the fact that I'm a Muslim, I really enjoyed and agree with most of what you said there!! I knew Gustaf Lubon said this about the great Muslim leader Musa Bin Nusairbeen: “If Musa Bin Nusairbeen was able to cross Europe, he would have converted it to Islam, and he would have achieved religious unity for the civilized nations. He would have also saved it from the backwardness it suffered from the darkness of the medieval ages, which was not experienced by Spain because it was under the rule of the Arabs.” But discovering the Americas? That's huge!
@adamnesico Жыл бұрын
Musa ibn Nusair was a mediocre man who apropiated of the success of his lieutenant tariq.
@AdamNoizer3 жыл бұрын
Muslims will finally have a good World Cup football team ⚽️ JK Also I love that you modelled the Andalusian flag off of Cordoban architecture.
@m.thorton93053 жыл бұрын
can't imagine the El Classico would be like, definitely not Barca vs Real anymore
@chronicthingz3 жыл бұрын
@@m.thorton9305 it would've be AL classico between Cordoba vs balencia 😂
@augustokonrad35723 жыл бұрын
Al-Classico lmao
@wabliohitika45213 жыл бұрын
Sergio Ramos = Sirag Rami
@byzantium00863 жыл бұрын
Cristiano Ronaldo = Muhammad abdulnado
@MatijaCG3 жыл бұрын
Imagine what would happend if the Ottomans never conquered the Balkans.
@Domainz773 жыл бұрын
Vodka
@chuckn48513 жыл бұрын
The better question
@kaedyn143 жыл бұрын
@Klunteng Full,,,, 👇😍 bro what the fuc-
@ducknapper19063 жыл бұрын
@@kaedyn14 wa
@ducknapper19063 жыл бұрын
@@kaedyn14 hey you acting sus with dat bot
@psssshhh77302 жыл бұрын
For the purpose of more food in the future, I will now add more thought provoking variables to your historical theory crafting. More specifically, there were some important occurrences in the middle east at the time that would go very differently with the presence of a strong, stable Andalusia (Al Andalus). I'll look at the Crusades, Abbasid decline, Mongol invasions, the Mameluke uprising, and the Ottomans The caliphate of Andalusia became known as such around the time the Umayyads were overthrown by the Persian backed Abbasids, and holed up in Iberia. Now, the Abbasids may have been the 'Golden Age' of Islam, but they were a also a political mess to rival the late Sassanids. Around the time of the (now failed) Reconquista, they were infighting like hell with mameluke armies, which lead to the rising of the Mameluke Sultanate. Andalusia, could potentially ally with the Mameluke Sultanate after they break with the Abbasids, dividing north Africa between themselves. Before that though, there was the Seljuk Turks appearing. The Turks would migrate like normal and the Seljuk Sultanate would take a bite out of the Abbasid Caliphate and Anatolia. Andalusia would prolly ally with them given the rivalry with the Byzantines and Abbasids and help the Seljuks develop via trade and give some military support against both. The Byzantines would call the Pope like normal, which would set off the Crusades again. The number of Crusaders would be lower since less Western European powers were unlikely to risk leaving home with a Muslim power in their backyard. The Umayyads of Andalusia may ally with the Abbasids as a response to the Crusades, so the Europeans would be less able to supply the Crusaders via sea, what with two Muslim navies in the ocean (one with greek fire to boot). Saladin may actually get a peaceful retirement. This leaves Anatolia to the Turks, whom would most likely fail to take Constantinople. Eastern Europe would weaken way more as a result and the Ottomans would rise again faster after the Mongols show up and do Mongol things. At this point the Abbasids would be at deaths door and politically isolated, so Bagdad would still be sacked. The Mamluks would most likely ally with Andalusia to beat back the Mongols easier. When the Ottomans absorb the Post Mongol remains of the Abbasids and Persians, they would likely have decent diplomatic ties with the Umayyads due to support during the Seljuk days. Being vaguely allied, and too far to really have any real conflicts, access to the Indian Ocean would remain uninterrupted. In Europe, France would have the advantage of not going bankrupt during the crusades and would start expanding into the significantly weaker east for that old dream of unifying the continent like Charlemagne wanted. It would conquer the northern territories and then discover the route to the new world that the Vikings once used. French speaking Canada too, I guess.
@angryhippy73 жыл бұрын
Here is an idea: What if the first Arab siege of Constantinople ended in Arab victory? Would a Muslim/Greek kingdom emerge and preserve Greek culture similarly to what the Saffarid dynasty did for Persia?
@boygenius538_83 жыл бұрын
Persian culture was integrated into Muslims long before the Safavids
@akbeh2 жыл бұрын
Islam would engulf Europe
@zhcultivator2 жыл бұрын
@Gigachad why?
@mirzubair82912 жыл бұрын
@@zhcultivator same a lot of Muslim kingdoms really have no interest in converting the local population a good example is was the way the Arabs never converted the Turks in the first place and many thought that if they converted the local population that mean no non-Muslim tax along with no slave.
@berry04-si3 жыл бұрын
I never thought the day would come but holy unexpected spanish inqusition it's here. It's actually here.
@wobbegong43663 жыл бұрын
And as usual we never expected it 😂
@sikid40003 жыл бұрын
This isn't the spanish inquisition lol
@shinsenshogun9003 жыл бұрын
It's the Andalusian Makahim
@enderboy1824 Жыл бұрын
10:06 I just noticed it was one of ISP’s videos. Absolutely stellar
@Unhinged_Autism3 жыл бұрын
Spanish Inquisition: *cries intensely*
@zosasho80363 жыл бұрын
I like your pfp
@Unhinged_Autism3 жыл бұрын
@@zosasho8036 thank you
@yayvideogames80323 жыл бұрын
Don’t you mean **cries unexpectedly**
@Unhinged_Autism3 жыл бұрын
@@yayvideogames8032 yes
@D_S_L3 жыл бұрын
Could you do more remakes please. Like "What if we Lost the Cold War" could be more detailed. I'm not saying it was bad, but it would still be cool to redo
@silentbyte1963 жыл бұрын
Awesome video Cody!
@morbinmorbiusthemorber38493 жыл бұрын
One thing to add to this scenario is the relationship Al Andalus would have with it's north african neighbourgs. Al Andalus in our timeline had little enclaves on the north-african cost (aside from the Mallorca islands which you put on the christian side while they were also conqueres by Al Andalus, but regardless). Al Andalus, probably, would try to expand in order to make a firm frontier against invasions from the south, which would have happened regularly because the almohads and Almoravids would probably still try to invade, even if they weren't invited like in our timeline, kinda like what the Franks did with the Pyrenees. Aside from that, the conflict between the Ottomans and Al Andalus, aside from religious differences, it would probably be in the view of the world as well. I don't know about if the ottomans really advanced in technology themselves, but I heard that since the Mongols and the sack of Baghdad the muslim world changed completely and it became a lot more conservative. But Al Andalus wouldn't be that affected, since it is already so detached from the main land of Islam, the middle east, and it also calls itself a caliphate, in opposition to the one of Baghdad (the rulers of Al Andalus were Umayyads, which themselves were purged by the Abbasids but one escaped to Al Andalus and so on). So, in this world, one caliphate would represent the liberal side of Islam, maybe progressing more and more and having a more liberal thought, meanwhile the other would be more so conservative on their interpretation of Islam. Also, Al Andalus was known for its religious tolerance (which the ottomans supposedly also partaked in, but I heard that they weren't that tolerable in the balkans), so such caliphate would still have it's jews and it's christians as minorities. Al Andalus was also kinda stratified by race, as the arabs nobles would be the rulers meanwhiles the native population were treated with "less respect" lets say, and also need to add the berbers into the mix. Al Andalus, kinda like "What if Japan became christian" would be islamic but it would be pretty different from other muslim regions. They might even have more in common with western Europe than the islamic world itself, and the enlightenment might have spread as well to muslim spain, regardless of religion.
@morbinmorbiusthemorber38493 жыл бұрын
Also, I might add that the ottomans could have prohibited the spice trade to Al-Andalus as well, as they might even see them as heretics, and also because they could just sell it again to the christians for a profit.
@jmgonzales7701 Жыл бұрын
what was the reason why andalus was more liberal compared to the ottomans? also why would they be discriminant in terms of race?
@morbinmorbiusthemorber3849 Жыл бұрын
@@jmgonzales7701 The sack of Baghdad was an event so traumatic for the middle east (well, the mongol and timurid invasions in general) that in theory people became pretty much fundamentalist over their interpretation of islam. Kinda like with christianity on the early middle ages if I can make the analogy. Supposedly, this ended the age of science in Islam leading to an age of obscurantism. This, I think, wouldn't really have affected the Umayyad, as first they were the fuck away from it, and they were ruled by the Umayyads, a dinasty which was absolutely massacred by the Abbasids leaving just one umayyad alive which then proceeded to conquer the peninsula, thus making Al Andalus and also making a new caliphate (kinda like a new popedom). This, imo, would make Al Andalus a refuge for that ancient, world of science islam. Why would they be discriminant of race? It's not why would they, I'm not saying hypotheticals. I'm saying that they were: "The Muslims, although united on the religious level, had several ethnic divisions, the main being the distinction between the Arabs and the Berbers. The Arab elite regarded non-Arab Muslims as second-class citizens; and they were particularly scornful of the Berbers.[86]" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus
@jmgonzales7701 Жыл бұрын
@@morbinmorbiusthemorber3849 i guess everyone had racism to a degree.
@jmgonzales7701 Жыл бұрын
@@morbinmorbiusthemorber3849 also fck the mongols
@komnoms43593 жыл бұрын
There's a really good alt timeline that goes into this, Moonlight in a Jar
@emperorfanta3643 жыл бұрын
I read that TL it is really good in my opinion
@bwkanimations73522 жыл бұрын
i love how english people spell arabic words, aal andaloos XD, much love bro for shedding lights on islam without making us like every hollywood film created, and also its spelled like al andals with a relly short u in the middle
@Barcaplsfkinwin3 жыл бұрын
Huh, was literally just halfway through a Granada campaign before origins fucked up my save file.
@MDP17023 жыл бұрын
Just revert back?
@Barcaplsfkinwin3 жыл бұрын
@@MDP1702 yh I did, it was just annoying when I booted up the game and I wanted to complain on the Internet
@hases27723 жыл бұрын
Ah my favorite achivement to get in CK3 was the Al-Andalus one were you had to avenge the battle of tours, if anyone hasn't tried it in ck3 then do so because its a pretty fun ( and long) run!
@salimelmouaffaq13513 жыл бұрын
Where and when would you recommend starting?
@LautaroArgentino3 жыл бұрын
@@salimelmouaffaq1351 my first game was in Iberia, the game has a list of recommended rulers. You can also play in Ireland for an even easier game.
@bayern14453 жыл бұрын
@@salimelmouaffaq1351 as salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh I started in 867 as the umayyad and beat the revolts I then recommend doing duchy conquests on north africa to bolster your holy sites for buffs and declaring a khalifat Then try to take over the north, declare a kingdom war for aquitaine and its easy sailing from there
@Hiitsazl2 жыл бұрын
@@bayern1445 was the leader of the rebels named ibn hafsun?
@johnnyboy34102 жыл бұрын
easiest way is 867 Umayyad start, you start strong but pushing into France is hard since Karlings exist
@makramchaaben57792 жыл бұрын
Very interesting topic, can you do the enxt time "What if Carthage won the punic wars?". That would change Europe as we know it today forever.
@oliveraludden68383 жыл бұрын
Nice video I would love to see one about Italian unification like what if it never unified Keep up the good work
@mshaqed25383 жыл бұрын
Or even better: What if Milan unified Italy (or at least the northern part) in the 14th century (And they were quite close to that under the leadership of Gian Galeazzo Visconti, who wished to create an Italian superpower out of Milan and turn the north into a great European power, but was stopped short of his objectives and died without even claiming himself king).
@beb6c2a3 жыл бұрын
Loved the video! But for the best part could you go deeper into the effects in the Islamic world? This part mostly focus around Europe itself but I believe the divergence will have as much or close of an effect to the Arab and Islamic world politically, culturally and even religious wise. Anyways great video 👍
@th3freakie3 жыл бұрын
Regarding that last bit of the video, there is a book about it in the french series of Alt-Hist books called "Jour J". The specific book is called "Colomb Pacha" and assumes a converted Colomb working for a surviving Emirate of Cordoba.
@sorenrekel-bludau98673 жыл бұрын
Great video! I've always thought that there could have been more made out of this scenario five years ago. But I'm not sure about the "There is no need to find new trade routes, even if the Ottomans take Constantinople" part. You've said earlier that Al-Andalus and the Ottoman Empire could have become the East and West of the Islamic world. As barring the Christians from using the Asian trade routes was IMO more of a political decision than anything else, it could have happened with this ideological conflict between two caliphates as well.
@maciejstanczyk66633 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to part 2. Very interesting scenario.
@tubate200923 жыл бұрын
Real nice Episode bro! Imagine the age of Exploration, kickstarted from the southern hemisphere
@thomasj77243 жыл бұрын
10:07 y’all watch, being given credit in the bottom right of an Alternate History Hub video will be ISPs breakout role!
@VinceR30003 жыл бұрын
hello gravy baby
@studentofknowlege3 жыл бұрын
The Ummayads were amazing, in just a few years they had an empire from France to India
@gunsol9003 жыл бұрын
@Klunteng Full,,,, 👇😍 nigga, what?
@jaroslawkaras73473 жыл бұрын
@@gunsol900 yeah ikr like wtf are these bots are these like protests against what youtube is today or something?
@AdamNoizer3 жыл бұрын
Bots under every comment 🙄
@a_09.73 жыл бұрын
Even to the borders of China
@gabbo71013 жыл бұрын
depends where you draw the line regarding india, also there were many kingdoms in the way between the umayydis and the franks, so your claim of boardering france would also be wrong. The ummayyids also collapsed shortly after, and were so decadent and corrupt that a giant, large-scale revolution was able to overthrow them. Abbassids are way better then umayyids, btw.
@paikuhansensei8152 жыл бұрын
Correction : it was not Spain, it was the Iberian peninsula (today's modern day Spain and Portugal).
@thelostchevalier3 жыл бұрын
"And yes, this is a two-parter" Good, I was hoping to hear that xD
@JD-rl7hg3 жыл бұрын
I think a video on what if the US never took the Philippines in the future would be really interesting. Its a concept thats been floating in my head for a while, and I'm quite surprised nobody has done it yet. My headcannon would be that Japan takes over and WW2 ends very differently, but idk. Maybe a good idea for a future video?
@AureliusLaurentius10993 жыл бұрын
There is also this option of the Germans wishing to acquire their own territory and just snatched the Philippines instead
@ghrtfhfgdfnfg3 жыл бұрын
Filipinos speak Spanish
@bae47682 жыл бұрын
@@ghrtfhfgdfnfg no, the phillipines had a revolution and they won it
@mrkilo-g87942 жыл бұрын
It would end up in the US territory anyways but this time during and after WW2 since Japan would've still invaded them and US save them just like ur timeline
@Limubi12 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video!!
@rimfire82173 жыл бұрын
Could you please do What if John Browns slave rebellion was successful?
@b.griffin3173 жыл бұрын
Without Columbus's deliberate plans to reach across the Atlantic I doubt anyone swept across by accident would be able to make it back. It would take extra supplies, a general idea of how to get there (and thus back) and a direct journey insuring the vessels were in good shape (as opposed to a ship-wreck) upon arrival to have any guarantee of a return voyage and thus being able to inform your countrymen of your discovery.
@MrColuber3 жыл бұрын
The video is showing something analogous to the discovery of Brazil. The Portuguese had discovered the Volta do Mar (a navigational technique) even before the discovery of America. Of course, as you have noticed, the Andalusians would have to do the same in order to return home. Unfortunately, Cody didn't mention whether the Andalusians had discovered the Atlantic Islands or not.
@nrbmemes24142 жыл бұрын
Why would the Muslims even need to go west. They had access to the Indian ocean so they didn't need to sail west to outmaneuver the Muslims..
@ultra-papasmurf Жыл бұрын
@@nrbmemes2414 All it would take is poor relations with the Mamluks or the ottomans and boom
@عبداللهوليد-س3و2 жыл бұрын
Nice efforts 👍 looking forward to more videos 🤠
@ozwolf013 жыл бұрын
If the Golden Age never ended, it would have been entirely possible that the first trans-atlantic crossing might have been sooner, rather than later. Also recall that Columbus was born in Genoa and Vespucci in Florence meaning that if they still sailed west as in our timeline they may have done so under those flags. America! as founded by the Medici family...
@abhiprakash749993 жыл бұрын
It was still about the spice tho. The Muslim iberians wouldn't be in a bind like the Christian iberians were. I assume the muslims sold spices to Christians at high prices