the level of example and explanation you gave ,🎩 off , sir....
@Best-Regions2 жыл бұрын
Best and most visual explanation I've seen. Thank you
@cyclingdude70183 жыл бұрын
Thanks Kamran! Love how you explain everything building up to the point without leaving us confused in the end.
@jasper5016 Жыл бұрын
Always had difficulty understanding this concept. Thanks so much.
@cartrivia83792 жыл бұрын
Most important points at the last, In distributed system we can't avoid partition (network failure) , so system should be always partition tolerance, so now choice is always between either consistency or availability.
@mearn_ctaftsman Жыл бұрын
Crystal clear sir 🙏
@onlycodingjeet Жыл бұрын
great explanation. Thank you
@sparkestic12382 жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@RetroFrequency2 жыл бұрын
Great explanation!
@surajitpradhan446 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@NguyenTuan-ek1pv2 жыл бұрын
Good video
@JoyWithShorts Жыл бұрын
When to choose Consistency and when to choose Availability?
@kamakshijayaraman374711 ай бұрын
thank you
@anshulnagpal14793 жыл бұрын
In case of "Partition Tolerance" Cannot we achieve Both Consistency and Availability by having redundant connections in between System S1 and System S2. One setting could be having another System S3 that connects both S1 and S2. That way Both Systems are always connected either directly or indirectly. In fact in real world applications, we have Distributed Systems with more than 2 Nodes.
@roadmapsh3 жыл бұрын
It doesn't really matter how you connect the nodes. Partition is not only specific to network issues but the failure of node S2 is also going to be considered as partition - what if S2 itself is dead and can't receive or process any messages; it doesn't really matter how the nodes are connected in that case. You might find this article interesting: codahale.com/you-cant-sacrifice-partition-tolerance
@mherify Жыл бұрын
So what is the solution to this problem?
@anshulnagpal14793 жыл бұрын
BTW, What Software do you use for making dynamic presentations ?