The quantum continuation of this video can be found here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gpOte3mkm5KBja8
@VENOM-ol6pv6 жыл бұрын
SIR, COULD YOU ALSO LINK QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS SHORTY!?!?!!?
@ronnyvbk6 жыл бұрын
Right hand rules ...
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Ronny, yes, that's how I got the directions correct. I just labeled them wrong in the key.
@josephhollandpontes10306 жыл бұрын
The Science Asylum congratulations 🎈🍾🎉 🎊Nick 💯 K 👏👏👏 1M 👀here we go!!!🤓🤩😎
@zodiacfml6 жыл бұрын
Congrats on that 100K subs! Finally!
@Lucky102796 жыл бұрын
How can we NOT crave quantum mechanics?
@parzh6 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Need more depth!
@ΣτέργιοςΚατσογιάννης6 жыл бұрын
Yep we need more ….
@zodiacfml6 жыл бұрын
Right and I think we will find a link between electromagnetism and gravity soon.
@saswatsarangi66696 жыл бұрын
LoL
@louis-philip6 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@joaquinbrandan86645 жыл бұрын
superb, I love it when things are explained clearly but also dont sacrifice depth or strict correctness.
@prasadvyssery19975 жыл бұрын
I hate u at first sight , then I like when I listen, then get digest when I watching . Now you my favored Science GURU from net. I love you man. Huge respect...!!!
@MichaelOrtega6 жыл бұрын
It’s a tingly sensation you get when you rub a ballon in your head
@scottanderson81676 жыл бұрын
Michael Ortega why would you do that
@parzh6 жыл бұрын
@@scottanderson8167 To get some electrons, free of charge (pun intended).
@ChallengeTheNarrative5 жыл бұрын
Rubbing bellend on bedsheets same thing?
@michael_zaki69033 жыл бұрын
What's a ballon
@michellegutierrez62525 жыл бұрын
Completely loved it! Great explanation of this beautiful analogy. :D
@ronaldderooij17746 жыл бұрын
YES! 100K subscribers! Well deserved!! Congratulations. And yes, I crave quantummechanics. Because I am a little crazy.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@aminelabidi61133 жыл бұрын
always craving more :D thanks man ♥
@KekusMagnus6 жыл бұрын
i'm still craving the QED, yes
@DipayanPyne5 жыл бұрын
Hi Nick ! I am back after quite a while (not that you remember me or that you even should, lol). Your explanations are awesome as usual. But I have some questions: 1) Is it right to say that fields like gravitational fields or electric fields are NOT CREATED by objects having masses or charges, but only AFFECTED by them ? 2) If the answer to the above is yes, then does that mean that fields, that are properties (as explained by you), are conceptually just mathematical tools for us to easily understand the behavior of tangible things like particles ? 3) Regardless of the answers to the above 2 questions, I don't quite understand how a particle with the property 'charge' actually manages to affect the field attached to the space around it, that results in a force on another particle (having charge) somewhere in that space. I mean I am interested in the reason, coz that seems to me the fundamental question that everyone watching the video is curious about. The same goes for the property mass. Why does any object with rest mass affect the gravitational field attached to the space around it ?
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
1) Yes, the EM field exists independently of each other and they just influence each other: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aYXYl4aIlq11bMk 2) Technically, _every_ model we come up with is a mathematical tool. Deciding whether or not something is "real" is tricky business though. We're not exactly sure. At the moment, the fields _appear_ to be "real." 3) This comes down to how QFT works, which is something I'll hopefully get into in future videos.
@TarunKumar-ub1ft6 жыл бұрын
Can you please do a video about gravito magnetism
@Cloudyinseattle5 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on QFD. Are all fields stacked on top of one another or are the part of one grand field or are they all mixed up and entangled.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
All the quantum fields occupy the same 3D space. Some of them interact (like the electron/positron field and the electromagnetic field). Other do not interact (like the electromagnetic field and the Higgs field).
@radinelaj-c7s Жыл бұрын
How do you know wich is positvely charged and negatively charged ? ( it is like the example of two magnets ,which attracting each other , which of them is negatively charged and which is positively charged ?)
@GH-oi2jfАй бұрын
The distinction was named arbitrarily, as he stated.
@radinelaj-c7sАй бұрын
@@GH-oi2jf what is : arbitrary
@philipberthiaume23146 жыл бұрын
'...mass as a property of objects and fields as a property of space', brilliant way to make it understandable.
@Smitology2 жыл бұрын
And then QFT comes and even messes up that intuition lol
@seanreese33145 жыл бұрын
"You don't want to have to use the Tensor field unless you have to" My entire experience as a physics major summed up into a single sentence.
@GMPStudios6 жыл бұрын
Screw PewDiePie. Screw T-Series. You are the best.
@athanassiospagalis9136 жыл бұрын
Ok buddy now we have a problem
@MrTeaboar6 жыл бұрын
Not the best, but way better than the other two. :)
@culwin6 жыл бұрын
No way, Pewdiepie is my go-to source for physics explanations. This channel is pretty good too, though.
@souadbenchaabane25906 жыл бұрын
9 years old army! ATTACK !
@milkywegian6 жыл бұрын
Bobs.
@MyEyesAhh6 жыл бұрын
I like that you actually respond to your comments! I binge watch these because you are really good at explaining complicated subjects. It’s nice to have a video to reference something as arbitrary as mass or electric charge because they’re are usually the starting assumption we make when solving problems. I love that you dig deeper and answer the questions that most people just accept as ultimately true. Thank you! Keep up the awesome content!
@prasanthmeesala52364 жыл бұрын
Do you know anyone known as isabelle and Robert zimmerman
@Rugbystu146 жыл бұрын
Once you go Quantum Mechanics, you never go back😂
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Ha!
@uploadJ5 жыл бұрын
QM, 100 yo "physics'; New theory GUTCP (Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics) shows more promise today, explains the electron and solves molecules in closed form equations versus QM 'curve fit' from observation.
@non-inertialobserver9465 жыл бұрын
To make it rhyme: Once you go quantum mech, you never go back
@kapnkerf25324 жыл бұрын
Once you go Quantum Mechanics, you were already there to begin with.
@morenapitso16953 жыл бұрын
@@kapnkerf2532 😂😂😂😂😎
@rajtandon87375 жыл бұрын
But why do the fields exist in the first place?
@Astrophile07074 ай бұрын
If we consider a field, it's just an area where a particle applies electrostatic force on another particle and makes it experience some force. For any electric field, if we consider, we always refer to charge present as it is the property of matter due to which it experiences electric field and gravitational force due to mass carried by it
@Astrophile07074 ай бұрын
As electric field depends on voltage, distance, charge and force of attraction between 2 charged particles
@Tio_rop3 ай бұрын
5 years late @@Astrophile0707
@hsheheishje96493 ай бұрын
Fields exist just because they do. They're fundamental to our universe and the best answer to why or how is just because. I know it is unsatisfying, but you cant really explain something that's just fundamental.
@gregmw6 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a video describing the U(1) Gauge Symmetry. PBS SpaceTime recently did a good one on the subject, and you and SpaceTime are excellent companions to one another, showing how to teach the same concepts in different but equally creative and insightful ways. You guys do some of the best science communication I've seen, exploring complex subjects without talking down to the viewer or simplifying the concepts beyond their breaking point. Great work as always.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
PBS Space Time is hosted by Matt O'Dowd :-)
@parzh6 жыл бұрын
@@firdacz Probably you're talking about Derek from Veritasium. I like his videos though.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Derek is Veritasium... Destin is SmarterEveryDay, Dianna is PhysicsGirl, and Michael is Vsauce :-)
@ihab2002ahmad6 жыл бұрын
@@firdacz What's IASF?
@firdacz5 жыл бұрын
@@ihab2002ahmad Isaac Arthur Science and Futurism, latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iHXTm6lor5iXr6c (every thursday - that's why many call it Arthur's day there). If you like that, you can also try Scott Manley, Everyday Astronaut and Curious Droid.
@issieoverhere12426 жыл бұрын
Craving Quantum!
@insideoli2 жыл бұрын
craving quantum too here!!!
@ratreptile6 жыл бұрын
The Snozzberries Taste Like Snozzberries! I understood that reference. lmao
@LifeHacks-pu3ol6 жыл бұрын
The snozberries!!! Hahaha! You boys like Mexico?!?!?! Yeehaw!.....P.S. I noticed you fixed the arrows on the gravity vector field!! Now I get it..lol
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, whoops! I was super paranoid about it this time.
@LifeHacks-pu3ol6 жыл бұрын
So many technicalities to deal with when presenting your truth.
6 жыл бұрын
Mexican grass? Ewww. Wait, Canadian grass, nice!
@KnowingBetter6 жыл бұрын
My inner child cannot handle the word "dingleberry" 😂
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Hahaha! Poop jokes!
@josephcoon58093 жыл бұрын
Shnozz = Nose Shnozz berries = boogers
@ScarletreverGaming3 жыл бұрын
@@josephcoon5809 Not according to Roald Dahl
@thejohnstonzoo5 жыл бұрын
I've been watching this guy for about 6 months. I'm finally getting some of what he's talking about. I got about 60% of this video. Good teacher!
@kayflynn53664 жыл бұрын
I think you are fantastic at explaining physics and making lt interesting, for someone with no knowledge of physics. l am 72 years old, thank you
@ScienceAsylum4 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome 😊
@DLewis-pn8yo4 жыл бұрын
Everyone: I now comprehend electric charge Me: What tf is ‘space’??
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Space = the X-Y-Z coordinate system in which our entire universe resides.
@ThatWarioGiant6 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 100k!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks! It's crazy.
@brandonkelley65006 жыл бұрын
The Science Asylum only yesterday I was watching your video on magnitude of 10. You had just reach 1000k subscribers pretty much 2 years ago... Yesterday I saw you were at 99980 subs... Today, you have 100 more subs! Congratulations !
@ThatWarioGiant6 жыл бұрын
The Science Asylum it’s okay to be a little crazy tho :P
@settingthewheelinmotion49785 жыл бұрын
Not condescending at all. The presenter reminds me of Bill Nye but without all the shouting.
@vothaison6 жыл бұрын
"This shouldn't be a surprise if you're already subscribed... ... subscribe...."
@danielwalker56825 жыл бұрын
Your films are brilliant. What fields are and how they relate to or interact with space (time?) is something I suspect many of us give up trying to understand once we have been "educated" to whatever degree in vector calculus. Anyway, keep up the great output!
@yuvrajh1672 Жыл бұрын
I also think Time also has a field...!🤔 ..⌛ And That field is attached to every atoms ..And That Field Vibrates...But This Vibrations changes at different point in space...and sometimes this change is just too much.. I think i should make a movie on this theory!📹😂😂! By The Way, I am from India!
@bellamcluce11844 жыл бұрын
Oh my god, this genius of a man just summed up an entire high school chapter into one video. Edit: technically it was an year ago but it's still relevant and yes I just subbed.
@Kevin_Street4 жыл бұрын
He's incredibly good at teaching these concepts.
@ichigo_nyanko6 жыл бұрын
Why do particles have the properties they do? Why must electrons have charge and mass and photons can't? Why do particles need to have mass, charge and spin at all instead of some other properties?
@ichigo_nyanko6 жыл бұрын
I just thought about it and it seems kinda obvious now. Of course electrons have the properties they do because they are just excitation of the fields. although I still can't figure out why the fields we have are what they are and not something else. And what causes those fields to get excited in the first place.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Don't worry about it. It's usually taught backwards, so a lot of people eventually have to ask questions like yours. Usually, it's said something like "the electron has these properties," when in reality it's the unique collection of properties that we call an "electron." Particles are _defined_ by their properties and those properties are (mostly) just directly measured. We don't really know why they have those specific values.
@scienceminded5 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceAsylum What's your opinion of models of the fundamental particles (quarks, electrons, the Bosons) as regions of the quantum field with toroidal geometry? The representations of the electron as a dipolar torus rather than a point particle in particular make sense to me, after learning of how toroidal magnetohydrodynamic systems remain stable (like ball lightning, smoke rings, tornadoes, fusion reactors or the reversed field configuration plasmoid) and non-linear optical media behave when excited beyond a critical energy ie. Wave-mixing/holography. Some theories include: The model of the toroidal electron having closed poloidal and toroidal field lines. The surface of the electron or other dipoles has out-of-phase magnetic and electric field vectors, the so-called 'near-field' of the antenna system. This also makes the concept of an 'orbital' make more sense to me, as a toroidal topology can distort around an atomic nucleus while conserving the energy-momentum relation, giving rise to the many bizarrely shaped orbitals. Since the internal structure of the electron is formed by the coupling of the Higgs field and the Electromagnetic fields of two gamma rays interfering, it seems logical to me that electrons are an interference pattern that is stable because of the spin contributions of the Higgs particle and one of the force carrying Bosons with complimentary spin vector to make a toroidal topology in the metric tensor. Interference patterns that form standing waves can have many 'point-like' constructive interference nodes as well as regions of destructive interference where the amplitude is zero. This would mimic our observation that electrons are spread out in a probability field, when the sub-structure is actually a kind of volumetric hologram composed of circulating EM waves in superposition, with electric field vectors extending to infinity being the consequence of the standing wave electromagnetic fields that non-dissipatively radiate from the electron.
@commonpike5 жыл бұрын
@The Science Asylum could you jusr as well say particles *are* their properties ? Is there anything about a, say, electron, that is not one of its properties ? ... Have we ever seen one ?
@sivaprasad20686 жыл бұрын
Best KZbinr ever in the history of KZbin
@nachannachle27065 жыл бұрын
I definitely enjoy your simplified analogy between charge and mass relative to fields. It makes for a much bigger picture than what is usually disseminated in Physics books!
@sMASHsound4 жыл бұрын
dude, that bigger picture is what is making more sense to me now. the 'smaller picture' didnt quite settle well in my brain, and i was kinda rejecting it. it wasnt enough to see the 'piece', i needed to see how the piece fits with the rest of pieces and see how it works, to understand it. and i am now getting it through this guy's vids.
@elvest96 жыл бұрын
what is electric charge? Baby don't shock me, don't shock me, no more.
@jumpieva3 жыл бұрын
i was dying when he start lickin the snozzberries
@TheCimbrianBull6 жыл бұрын
Congratulations, Nick, on reaching 100,000 subscribers! You did it! 😀 🎂 🎊 🎁 💐
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks! No, _we_ did it. All of us. I still can't believe this many people were like "Yeah, I'll watch more of this guy."
@TheCimbrianBull6 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceAsylum Don't forget to claim your silver play button from KZbin! 😀
@veky34596 жыл бұрын
congrats on 100 000 subscribers!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@clieding6 жыл бұрын
I should be millions! 👭👫👭👫👬👭👬👭👫👭👭👭👬👭👭👫👬👭👭👬👭👬👭👬👬...
@revers8886 жыл бұрын
Finally! You totally deserved it, long time ago.
@Lucky102796 жыл бұрын
I love 3Blue1Brown!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Me too :-) He's as soft spoken in person as he is on video, by the way.
@clieding6 жыл бұрын
Me too-three. Grant from 3Blue1Brown has an wonderful clear, mellow, engaging narrator’s voice 🎻 I love Nick’s voice too but for different reasons; Nick has a “Life is a Ball, let’s have some fun!” 🎉🎈🎺🎆 voice.
@duckymomo79353 жыл бұрын
3blue1brown is such a king
@bytefu6 жыл бұрын
A deeper dive into electrodynamics will not hurt.
@god35974 жыл бұрын
We want Quantum mechanics.
@oximas4 жыл бұрын
hey sir i am craving for quantum mechanics , i need for liiiiife
@Vistico936 жыл бұрын
I made it into a video. That's awesome! I'm not able to visualize in my head so I really appreciate these videos' animations coupled with your explanations. It makes me wonder if that's why Calculus proved so difficult for me (and to a lesser extent, geometry): it required more visualization to understand what the numbers were telling me. I like that science has been making real progress in this field (no pun intended) over the past century. I look forward to more pieces of the puzzle of existence falling into place as my life permits
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Yes, these are very dynamic things, so static pictures in a book just don't do them justice.
@aryavanshsaraf43575 жыл бұрын
Brother ur channel is joyful and knowledgeable I request you to do something on STRING THEORY [I'm not a kid(see my profile image) it's my brother's account]
@Lucky102794 жыл бұрын
"There's just as much field pointing in as there is pointing out." That reminds of how my calc 3 professor explained the divergence theorem -- he said it's like if you have lots of people going in and out of a country and you want to measure how many of them there are, you can either look at the country as a whole (surface integral) or you can just look at the borders where the movement is happening (line integral).
@ScienceAsylum4 жыл бұрын
Oh.... that's a great analogy!
@Lucky102794 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceAsylum Feel free to use it! I'm sure he won't mind. He'd probably be happy people are benefiting from it. He's a retired mechanical engineer who's very passionate about math and physics and loves using physical scenarios to talk about Calculus concepts.
@coolmood21334 жыл бұрын
I think if i still watching you i will become a scientist 🤣🤣🤣😜 Hly Fk crazy nice explaining You are the best👨🔬ever 😎😎
@GMPStudios6 жыл бұрын
I think this will make into the "New to Science Asylum?" playlist.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
You think so? I try to put a lot of variety in that playlist.
@GMPStudios6 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceAsylum or maybe time to create a playlist called "What is that?". Most of the recent videos would come under it!
@bernardogbecker6 жыл бұрын
Hm, idk, I think your answer was a little incomplete. Your video about mass were much better, at that video you didnt answer just as "a property of matter that makes the connection between objects and the gravitational field". I mean, your video was soo good explaining what is a field& eletrical field, but i wish for a deeply exaplanation of what actually is charge, like why quarks have this amount of charge and electrons another quantity and type of charge, i think u understand what i mean. Btw, i follow you for over a year now, love your channel and I'm from Brazil, so sorry if i made some mistakes when typing in another language lol.
@Chad_Thundercock6 жыл бұрын
3:04 Damn, that's a sweet earth. ROUND!!
@NotHPotter6 жыл бұрын
I know how old you are.
@aryyancarman7054 жыл бұрын
@@NotHPotter As old as no of likes? {jk}
@scolack1233 жыл бұрын
Dear god my memories Fire ze missles!!! AHHHH MOTHALAND
@Schorochoff5 жыл бұрын
Yep but we still don't know what 's exactly gravity or charge made of. Graviton ... Electron (what's exactly an electron except a strange thing) Love your style btw
@GMPStudios6 жыл бұрын
I reached 1K subs in the exact samt moment you reached 100K subs! Congrats to you.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Congrats!
@GMPStudios6 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceAsylum Thanks a lot
@kartvyasheth20874 жыл бұрын
More quantum mechanics plzz
@FGj-xj7rd6 жыл бұрын
My man, congrats on hitting 100K.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Bassotronics6 жыл бұрын
Quarternions = 4 Onions. Or 4 onions that are the size of a quarter. (I would like a Quarternion for my sandwich.)
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Quaternions = not only do we have imaginary numbers, we also have joke numbers and kooky numbers.
@pauldaniel54576 жыл бұрын
i really liked the vector arrows part bring it in more often.
@nishantsingh45705 жыл бұрын
Craving for quantum mechanics
@JAUNEtheLOCKE3 жыл бұрын
DEFINITELY subscribing after this!! Answered all my questions and other questions I didn’t even know I HAD! Thank you so so much, you’re making me start to actually not hate Chemistry
@fdzaviation Жыл бұрын
The reference to the End of the WOrld video cracks me up every time: Here's the Earth... chilling That is a sweet earth you might say. ROOOUUUUNNND All right. Ruling out the Ice caps Melting, Meteor becoming crash into us, the ozone layar leaving and the sun exploding, we're definetly going to blow ourselves up AHHAHAHA LOVE your videos.
@pamelacollins11535 жыл бұрын
This cleared up a lot for me, but . . . Still craving the quantum mechanics. And THANK YOU for re-igniting my love of science. I’m so glad I found your KZbin channel 😜😊
@D-Tie6 жыл бұрын
Yeah so as an electrical engineer myself, I still wonder, having seen this video, what is electrical charge? Is it really just a physical property of particles that we can not explain further? Or could we go deeper? Maybe, as the electromagnetic force has been identified to be equal to the weak atomic force, we could say more? Also, is it entirely correct to say that the photon is the boson that mediates the forces of the electromagnetic field? Or do the Z and W bosons also play a role in it?
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
1) We can't really go any deeper. That's all charge really is: a conserved property in an interaction. Sure, there's a "deeper" quantum mechanical explanation of where it comes from, but even then it's still only a conserved property in an interaction. 2) W bosons mediate the weak nuclear force only. They do have charge themselves, so they _also interact_ with the electromagnetic field, but that doesn't mean they mediate interactions between that field and other particles.
@KohuGaly6 жыл бұрын
The labels in science are descriptive. An electric charge is whatever causes electric flux to be non-zero. Whatever fits that definition is considered an electric charge. We may go "deeper" and derive what electromagnetic field and charge are via Noether's theorem (the things we need to include to preserve symmetry under U(1) gauge group). Off course, to confirm such thing actually exists in the real world requires experiment (note: for electromagnetism this was technically done the other way around - experiment first, definition second). The thing is, there may hypothetically be multiple metaphysical things that fit the definition and all of them would be electromagnetic field and charge by definition. It might not even be possible to tell them apart, so we may as well treat them as the same fundamental thing.
@0ttt3R4 жыл бұрын
Like others have said, I can't wait until this channel becomes one of the big science channels everyone knows; the content is certainly deserving. I think you do a brilliant job at balancing accurate information with the need to simplify some pretty complex aspects. While probably still a little 'deep' or 'heavy' for him at the moment, me and my 5 year old have really enjoyed watching your videos.
@ScienceAsylum4 жыл бұрын
I love to hear when parents share with their children 😊
@vamshikrishna83616 жыл бұрын
Can u make a video on uncertainty principle in detail.I know u already have but that's quite brief. I say I am crazy enough to dig it deeper .
@MrBrelindm5 жыл бұрын
If fields are intrinsic to space then what effect does an expanding universe have on field strength? Is overall field strength conserved? Or does it's value increase? Is it possible to read a field's strength without any moving particles being involved? What is the reactance of empty space (vacuum)? How can it be modified? Since plasma is disassociated atoms it is always highly charged, conductive, and magnetic yet despite it's seeming chaos, it self organizes into intergalactic filaments. Why?
@sMASHsound4 жыл бұрын
*mind blown*
@solapowsj254 жыл бұрын
An expanding resonance universe has uniform field such that 'c' is the constant that Einstein described. If at any point in spacetime the constant does change, then physics and life would show Biblical variations.
@rayhanmansoor29516 жыл бұрын
Congrats for 100k suBS
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@lalmurari98686 жыл бұрын
100k congo
@niloybhuiyan33744 жыл бұрын
Sir please make a vdo on kirchhoff's current law, voltage and capacitor sir please....
@hjcks16 жыл бұрын
congrats reaching 100k!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@YoLoboBro6 жыл бұрын
Snozberries may taste like snozberry, but I would strongly discourage you from trying a dingleberry.
@JoshKaufmanstuff6 жыл бұрын
Congrats on 100K Subscribers!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@IngloriousPirandello6 жыл бұрын
I like this response, but also I want more q.m. about. I want see how much deep this rabbit hole is!!! Muahahahah
@AnEvolvingApe6 жыл бұрын
For all that is good and holy! Don't lick the dingleberries!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Solid advice.
@ChallengeTheNarrative5 жыл бұрын
That's what she said
@ManyHeavens423 жыл бұрын
It's like dark energy,One pushing one Pulled great job Love ya"
@scottanderson81676 жыл бұрын
How did you know I am crazy
@AdnanAli-cw7xt4 жыл бұрын
So.it means that in reality if we look from quantum mechanics and electrodynamics both point of view.....Charge doesn't exist but it's a field that exist ....Means that Field is the cause charge is the effect !!!...... PlzzZzzzzzzzzzzz reply 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@ScienceAsylum4 жыл бұрын
It is true that there aren't really particles. There are only quantum fields: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j2iklGuwgLl3Y6c However, charge isn't a particle. It's just a number we made up to describe a behavior. The behavior charge is describing is how linked the electron field is to the electromagnetic field. We can't really understand why that link exists without quantum field theory.
@capella33686 жыл бұрын
You deserve much more subs and views
@manojdhanda96725 жыл бұрын
Best explanation ever thanks buddy.I always like your videos.
@quahntasy6 жыл бұрын
You are the best. Screw mrbeast Shane's and pies.
@terryfahey99522 жыл бұрын
Why does the balloon create static charge on your hair when it’s blow up and it doesn’t when it’s deflated?
@NitronNeutron6 жыл бұрын
More!!!
@MG-te9ub3 жыл бұрын
I’m glad that on top of your science knowledge you also speak AVE
@admiraladama58776 жыл бұрын
Hey Nick.... are you sure about that?
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Yep.
@admiraladama58776 жыл бұрын
So you’re positive. Sorry, I had to do it.
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Ha!
@wheeliekidbp6 жыл бұрын
Ah! Nice one!
@hectordiazadasme21715 жыл бұрын
Let quantum mechanics in >:vvv
@kripashankarshukla40736 жыл бұрын
Congrats for 100K subscribers. Go Nick and soon you will get a million. We all will help in making your channel popular. Best of luck!!
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@ThatWarioGiant6 жыл бұрын
woo new video!!
@philv2529 Жыл бұрын
"Fuckin' magnets, how do THEY work?!" ICP
@chixulub6 жыл бұрын
That sneaky reference at 3:04 really brings me back :)
@wheeliekidbp6 жыл бұрын
I'm still not getting it.
@germaindrouet47546 жыл бұрын
Loved the video Nick and champagne pop for your 100k 👍😊. You are slowly reeling all the zombies back to the real world 😅 When you get a chance, I would love to see the magnetic field sequel please.... maybe with a little quantum add on too? 💛
@Layarion3 жыл бұрын
"a field, is a value or set of val..." and my eyes are glazing over now.
@Cursedkarma46 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much this video was really useful for me😃
@ScienceAsylum Жыл бұрын
You're welcome 🤓. Glad I could help!
@Dumani_Manqoba3 жыл бұрын
Scince a moving charge can create magnetic fields so can a moving proton like moving electron create a magnetic field?
@piazzalungaut5 жыл бұрын
moar quantum mechanics, but with a deterministic flavour :)
@wantsomecandies732 жыл бұрын
I want more such stuffs ,they are stimulating right side of my brain.
@mike36845 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you didn't lick the Dingleberrys'!!
@jenf25805 жыл бұрын
Nick, Maybe this is very long but P.S. I am a curious man. So please don't feel that my question in senseless. How does the electron get the energy to orbit the nucleus. It isn't orbiting like the crazy way of explaining planet's orbit. It behaves like wave too. But yet it's also a particle. It should revolve and move crazily. If it's from photons, then they just get excited and give back the same photon with same energy{ LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY}. Also an electron cannot posses the energy it possesses now because it can do so many crazy & mind boggling stuff. Pls do answer and consider my thought. I am just a kid 😅.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
These videos might help: Energy: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o Chemical Bonds: kzbin.info/www/bejne/o3eudIqVeZeie5Y
@hatim94973 жыл бұрын
Yeah! So +ve and -ve charges are nothing but different types of force
@fdavillar6 жыл бұрын
@eScienceAsylum Why magnetic fields don't obey the Inverse Square Law? Why a magnetic field is made of concentric "fluxes"? I'm talking about the spikes we can see when applying ferrofluid on a magnet... Why arrows, why lines, why not a tide? Why this field do not go progressive faint using the Inverse Square Law??
@ScienceAsylum6 жыл бұрын
Because you can't ever get a single magnetic pole. They always come in pairs, so (according to Gauss's law) the "flux" is _always zero_ for magnetic poles.
@بوفارسبونورا-ص7ه3 жыл бұрын
Similar charges attract . Similar charges cause an electrical discharge between them. When does the atraction happen and when does the discharge happen ? I did not find an answer to that.